What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology?: social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Buch |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
London [u.a.]
Elsevier/ Academic Press
2008
|
Ausgabe: | 1. ed. |
Schriftenreihe: | Food science and technology
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XVIII, 342 S. Ill., graph. Darst. |
ISBN: | 9780123739902 012373990X |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023243177 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20080708 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 080407s2008 ad|| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
015 | |a GBA812915 |2 dnb | ||
020 | |a 9780123739902 |9 978-0-12-373990-2 | ||
020 | |a 012373990X |9 0-12-373990-X | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)191752281 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023243177 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a TP248.25.N35 | |
082 | 0 | |a 174.96205 |2 22 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? |b social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs |c ed. by Kenneth David ... |
250 | |a 1. ed. | ||
264 | 1 | |a London [u.a.] |b Elsevier/ Academic Press |c 2008 | |
300 | |a XVIII, 342 S. |b Ill., graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Food science and technology | |
650 | 4 | |a Nanotechnology / Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Nanotechnology / Social aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Genetically modified foods / Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Agricultural biotechnology | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethik | |
650 | 4 | |a Gesellschaft | |
650 | 4 | |a Agricultural biotechnology |x Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Biotechnology |x ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Food, Genetically Modified | |
650 | 4 | |a Genetically modified foods |x Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Nanotechnology |x Moral and ethical aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Nanotechnology |x Social aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Nanotechnology |x ethics | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaftstransfer |0 (DE-588)4207539-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt |0 (DE-588)4132508-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Nanotechnologie |0 (DE-588)4327470-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Biotechnologie |0 (DE-588)4069491-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Nanotechnologie |0 (DE-588)4327470-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt |0 (DE-588)4132508-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Ethik |0 (DE-588)4015602-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Biotechnologie |0 (DE-588)4069491-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Wissenschaftstransfer |0 (DE-588)4207539-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | |C b |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a David, Kenneth |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m OEBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016428683&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016428683 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804137542022332416 |
---|---|
adam_text | CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. XI PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .. XIII ABOUT THE AUTHORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .. XV PART 1 ANALYTIC INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 1 1 SOCIO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THOSE CONCERNED WITH
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY, ENGAGEMENT, AND GOVERNANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 KENNETH DAVID IN A NUTSHELL:
OUR AUDIENCES AND OUR CORE OBJECTIVE. . . . 4 NANO-BENEFITS,
NANO-ISSUES, NANO-FEARS, AND REACTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 OBJECTIVES OFTHIS VOLUME .. . .. ..
... . . . . ... . ... . . 16 CONTENDING PERSPECTIVES . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ROADMAP TO
THISVOLUME........................ 21 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 ENDNOTES . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 REFERENCES. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 29
INTERNET REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. 30 PART2 LOOKING BACK TO THE BIO DEBATE. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 31
2 LEARNING FROM MISTAKES: MISSTEPS IN PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE ISSUES WITH
GMOS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 ALAN MCHUGHEN INTRODUCTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
PROBLEMS WITH TERMINOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
WHAT IS GENETIC MODIFICATION/GENETIC ENGINEERING/BIOTECHNOLOGY? . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 HISTORY OFBIOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 VI CONTENTS HOW IS BIOTECHNOLOGY
(RDNA) USED? . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 38 APPLICATIONS OF
BIOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 38 RED AND GREEN
BIOTECHNOLOGY , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 BIOTECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN
COMPARED TO A TRAIN. . . . . . . . 41 RISKS: REAL AND PERCEIVED . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 42 DISTINGU ISH ING PERSPECTIVES
... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 REFERENCES. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3 THE
ETHICS OF AGRI-FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY: HOW CAN AN AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY BE
SO IMPORTANT? 55 JEFFREY BURKHARDT INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS OF
AGBIOTECH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 THE SAFETY OFGM FOODS. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 62 ETHICS AND CHOICE , . . . . . .
64 ETHICS AND CONTRO!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 69 CONCLUSION: WHITHER NANOTECHNOLOGY ETHICS? .... . . . . 74
REFERENCES , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 INTERNET
REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 79 4
A VIEW FROM THE ADVOCACY COMMUNITY . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 MARGARET
MELLON INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 81 BASICS OF THE BIOTECHNOLOGY DEBATE. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 82 CONTINUING CONTROVERSY FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD
APPLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 CLASSIFYING
NANOTECHNOLOGY RISKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 84 CONSEQUENCES
IF NANOCHEM ICALS PRESENT SPECIAL RISKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 85 THREE LESSONS. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 PART 3 QUESTIONING THE
ANALOGY (FROM BIO TO NANO) . . . 89 5 THE THREE TEACHINGS OF
BIOTECHNOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 MICKEY GJERRIS LNTRODUCTION . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 WHAT
ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? , . . . . . . 93 IFYOU DO NOT AGREE WITH ME YOU
MUST BE STUPID! ..... 96 A ONE-SIDED DIALOGUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 101 ENDNOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 102 REFERENCES , . . . . .
. . . . . .. 103 INTERNET REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .. 104 6 7 8 FROM BIO TO NANO: LEARNING THE LESSONS,
INTERROGATING THE COMPARISONS . PHILIP MACNAGHTEN INTRODUCTION .
LEARNING FROM THE PAST . LEARNING FROM THE PRESENT . LESSONS FOR
NANOTECHNOLOGIES . ENDNOTES . REFERENCES . NANO AND BIO: HOW ARE THEY
ALIKE? HOW ARE THEY DIFFERENT? . PAUL B. THOMPSON WHY NANOTECHNOLOGY MAY
NOT BE MUCH LIKE BIOTECHNOLOGY . HYPOTHESIS 1: FOOD TECHNOLOGIES ARE
SENSITIVE . HYPOTHESIS 2: THE NATURALNESS THING . HYPOTHESIS 3: PLAYING
GOD . HYPOTHESIS 4: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE . HYPOTHESIS 5: PUBLIC
EDUCATIONAL EFFORTS ARE INOCULATING NANOTECHNOLOGY AGAINST PUBLIC
OPPOSITION . HYPOTHESIS 6: AGRIFOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY WAS NARROW,
NANOTECHNOLOGY IS BROAD . HYPOTHESIS 7: NO BENEFIT TO CONSU MERS .
HYPOTHESIS 8: LACK OF CONFIDENCE IN THE REGULATORY SYSTEM . HYPOTHESIS
9: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS . HYPOTHESIS 10: CHANGING RELATIONS OF
ECONOMIC POWER ANALYSIS . REFERENCES . INTERNET REFERENCES . IT S LIKE
DEJAE-VU, ALL OVER AGAIN : ANTICIPATING SOCIETAL RESPONSES TO
NANOTECHNOLOGIES . AMY K. WOLFE AND DAVID]. BJORNSTAD INTRODUCTION . HOW
MANY MORE TIMES WILL WE BE SURPRISED BY SOCIETAL RESPONSES? . WHY IS
THE SAME TECHNOLOGY SOMETIMES ACCEPTED AND SOMETIMES REJECTED IN
APPARENDY SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES? . TO WHAT EXTENT CAN WE ACCURATELY
ANTICIPATE SOCIETAL RESPONSES AND ACCEPTABILITY? . HOW CAN, OR SHOULD,
SOCIETY MAKE BETTER-INFORMED DECISIONS? . 107 107 108 114 119 120 121
125 127 130 132 134 135 137 138 141 143 146 148 150 152 155 157 158 159
160 161 161 CONTENTS VII VIII CONTENTS AGRICULTURAL
NANOTECHNOLOGIES-MEMBERS OF A CLASS OFTECHNOLOGIES , .. .. . 162
PATTERNS OF SOCIETAL RESPONSE CAN BE ANTICIPATED , 164 SUGGESTING A
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: PAA. . . . . . . .. 165 CONCLUSION: A CALL FOR A
CONVERGENT SCIENCE OF SOCIETAL RESPONSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 ENDNOTES. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 170 REFERENCES. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 171 INTERNET
REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
PART 4 AREAS OF AMBIGUITY IN IMPLEMENTING AN EMERGINGTECHNOLOGY. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 9 A FRAMEWORKFOR TRANSLATING
BIOTECHNOLOGY EXPERIENCES TO NANOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 175 DAVID SPAR/ING NEW TECHNOLOGIES FROM DISCOVERY TO MARKET . . . .
. . . . 176 FROM SCIENCE TO TECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 177 RADICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION . . . . . . . . . . . ..
179 INNOVATION AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . .. 180 NEW
TECHNOLOGIES AND INDUSTRY STRUCTURE . . . . . . . . . . 183 ENDNOTES .
187 REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .. 187 10 ENGAGEMENT AND TRANSLATION: PERSPECTIVE OF A NATURAL
SCIENTIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 189 HANS
GEERLINGS AND KENNETH DAVID FOCUS 192 ENGAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 194 TRANSLATION ISSUES . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 DISCUSSION. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 217 ENDNOTES
,. 218 REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 218 INTERNET REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .. 219 11 BIOTECHNOLOGY, NANOTECHNOLOGY, MEDIA, AND PUBLIC
OPINION , 221 SUSANNA PRIEST INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 221 PROBLEMATIZING THE CATEGORIES . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 MEDIA AND PUBLIC OPINION. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 225 SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF THE PUBLIC .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 231 ENDNOTES. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 REFERENCES. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 233 PART 5 LOOKING
FORWARD TO THE NANO SITUATION. . . . . . . 235 CONTENTS IX 12 13 LESSONS
FROM THE BIO-DECADE: A SOCIAL SDENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEORGE GASKEIL INTRODUCTION .
UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS OFINNOVATION . QUESTIONING SOUND SCIENCE .
PERSPECTIVES ON RISK . MENACING IMAGES AND MAGICAL THINKING .
UNCERTAINTY AND ANXIETY . WEIGHING UP GAINS AND LOSSES . TRUTH CLAIMS
AND COMMUNICATING SCIENCE . CHANGING SCIENCE, CHANGING SOCIETIES .
IMPLICATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY . REFERENCES . WHAT CAN NANOTECHNOLOGY
LEARN FROM BIOTECHNOLOGY? . LAWRENCE BUSCH ANDJOHN R. LLOYD INTRODUCTION
. SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION . THE PROCESS OFINNOVATION OFNEW PRODUCTS IN
BIOTECHNOLOGY . PROCESSES OFVARIABLE REGULATION OFBIOTECHNOLOGY . FUROR
OVER BOVINE GROWTH HORMONE . THE MAJOR ACTORS . RECENT DEVELOPMENTS .
CONCLUSIONS: LESSONS IDENTIFIED . ENDNOTES . REFERENCES . INTERNET
REFERENCES . 237 237 239 242 245 248 249 250 253 256 257 257 261 261 263
265 266 267 268 272 273 274 274 276 APPENDIX I A PRIMER ON GENETIC
ENGINEERING. . . . . . . . 277 APPENDIX 11 REPORT FROM THE STANDARDS FOR
NANOTECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
APPENDIX 111 LIST OFABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
APPENDIX IV PARTICIPANTS AT FIRST INTERNATIONAL IFAS CONFERENCE ON
NANOTECHNOLOGY WHAT CAN NANO LEARN FROM BIO? . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . 323 APPENDIX V PARTICIPANTS IN THE STANDARDS FOR
NANOTECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP, 2006. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 INDEX. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
330 SERIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .. 341
|
adam_txt |
CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. XI PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . XIII ABOUT THE AUTHORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . XV PART 1 ANALYTIC INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 1 1 SOCIO-TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF THOSE CONCERNED WITH
EMERGING TECHNOLOGY, ENGAGEMENT, AND GOVERNANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 KENNETH DAVID IN A NUTSHELL:
OUR AUDIENCES AND OUR CORE OBJECTIVE. . . . 4 NANO-BENEFITS,
NANO-ISSUES, NANO-FEARS, AND REACTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 OBJECTIVES OFTHIS VOLUME . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 16 CONTENDING PERSPECTIVES . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ROADMAP TO
THISVOLUME. 21 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 ENDNOTES . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 REFERENCES. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
INTERNET REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 30 PART2 LOOKING BACK TO THE BIO DEBATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2 LEARNING FROM MISTAKES: MISSTEPS IN PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE ISSUES WITH
GMOS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 ALAN MCHUGHEN INTRODUCTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
PROBLEMS WITH TERMINOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
WHAT IS GENETIC MODIFICATION/GENETIC ENGINEERING/BIOTECHNOLOGY? . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 HISTORY OFBIOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 VI CONTENTS HOW IS BIOTECHNOLOGY
(RDNA) USED? . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 APPLICATIONS OF
BIOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 RED AND GREEN
BIOTECHNOLOGY , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 BIOTECHNOLOGY HAS BEEN
COMPARED TO A TRAIN. . . . . . . . 41 RISKS: REAL AND PERCEIVED . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 DISTINGU ISH ING PERSPECTIVES
. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 REFERENCES. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 3 THE
ETHICS OF AGRI-FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY: HOW CAN AN AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY BE
SO IMPORTANT? 55 JEFFREY BURKHARDT INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS OF
AGBIOTECH . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 THE SAFETY OFGM FOODS. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 ETHICS AND CHOICE , . . . . . .
64 ETHICS AND CONTRO!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 69 CONCLUSION: WHITHER NANOTECHNOLOGY ETHICS? . . . . . 74
REFERENCES , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 INTERNET
REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4
A VIEW FROM THE ADVOCACY COMMUNITY . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 MARGARET
MELLON INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 81 BASICS OF THE BIOTECHNOLOGY DEBATE. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 82 CONTINUING CONTROVERSY FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD
APPLICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 CLASSIFYING
NANOTECHNOLOGY RISKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 CONSEQUENCES
IF NANOCHEM ICALS PRESENT SPECIAL RISKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 THREE LESSONS. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 PART 3 QUESTIONING THE
ANALOGY (FROM BIO TO NANO) . . . 89 5 THE THREE TEACHINGS OF
BIOTECHNOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 MICKEY GJERRIS LNTRODUCTION . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 WHAT
ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? , . . . . . . 93 IFYOU DO NOT AGREE WITH ME YOU
MUST BE STUPID! . 96 A ONE-SIDED DIALOGUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 ENDNOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 REFERENCES , . . . . .
. . . . . . 103 INTERNET REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 104 6 7 8 FROM BIO TO NANO: LEARNING THE LESSONS,
INTERROGATING THE COMPARISONS . PHILIP MACNAGHTEN INTRODUCTION .
LEARNING FROM THE PAST . LEARNING FROM THE PRESENT . LESSONS FOR
NANOTECHNOLOGIES . ENDNOTES . REFERENCES . NANO AND BIO: HOW ARE THEY
ALIKE? HOW ARE THEY DIFFERENT? . PAUL B. THOMPSON WHY NANOTECHNOLOGY MAY
NOT BE MUCH LIKE BIOTECHNOLOGY . HYPOTHESIS 1: FOOD TECHNOLOGIES ARE
SENSITIVE . HYPOTHESIS 2: THE NATURALNESS THING . HYPOTHESIS 3: PLAYING
GOD . HYPOTHESIS 4: ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASE . HYPOTHESIS 5: PUBLIC
EDUCATIONAL EFFORTS ARE INOCULATING NANOTECHNOLOGY AGAINST PUBLIC
OPPOSITION . HYPOTHESIS 6: AGRIFOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY WAS NARROW,
NANOTECHNOLOGY IS BROAD . HYPOTHESIS 7: NO BENEFIT TO CONSU MERS .
HYPOTHESIS 8: LACK OF CONFIDENCE IN THE REGULATORY SYSTEM . HYPOTHESIS
9: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS . HYPOTHESIS 10: CHANGING RELATIONS OF
ECONOMIC POWER ANALYSIS . REFERENCES . INTERNET REFERENCES . "IT'S LIKE
DEJAE-VU, ALL OVER AGAIN": ANTICIPATING SOCIETAL RESPONSES TO
NANOTECHNOLOGIES . AMY K. WOLFE AND DAVID]. BJORNSTAD INTRODUCTION . HOW
MANY MORE TIMES WILL WE BE "SURPRISED" BY SOCIETAL RESPONSES? . WHY IS
THE SAME TECHNOLOGY SOMETIMES ACCEPTED AND SOMETIMES REJECTED IN
APPARENDY SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES? . TO WHAT EXTENT CAN WE ACCURATELY
ANTICIPATE SOCIETAL RESPONSES AND ACCEPTABILITY? . HOW CAN, OR SHOULD,
SOCIETY MAKE BETTER-INFORMED DECISIONS? . 107 107 108 114 119 120 121
125 127 130 132 134 135 137 138 141 143 146 148 150 152 155 157 158 159
160 161 161 CONTENTS VII VIII CONTENTS AGRICULTURAL
NANOTECHNOLOGIES-MEMBERS OF A CLASS OFTECHNOLOGIES , '" . . . 162
PATTERNS OF SOCIETAL RESPONSE CAN BE ANTICIPATED , 164 SUGGESTING A
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: PAA. . . . . . . . 165 CONCLUSION: A CALL FOR A
CONVERGENT SCIENCE OF SOCIETAL RESPONSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 ENDNOTES. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 REFERENCES. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 INTERNET
REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172
PART 4 AREAS OF AMBIGUITY IN IMPLEMENTING AN EMERGINGTECHNOLOGY. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 9 A FRAMEWORKFOR TRANSLATING
BIOTECHNOLOGY EXPERIENCES TO NANOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 175 DAVID SPAR/ING NEW TECHNOLOGIES FROM DISCOVERY TO MARKET . . . .
. . . . 176 FROM SCIENCE TO TECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 177 RADICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION . . . . . . . . . . . .
179 INNOVATION AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY. . . . . . . . 180 NEW
TECHNOLOGIES AND INDUSTRY STRUCTURE . . . . . . . . . . 183 ENDNOTES " .
187 REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 187 10 ENGAGEMENT AND TRANSLATION: PERSPECTIVE OF A NATURAL
SCIENTIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189 HANS
GEERLINGS AND KENNETH DAVID FOCUS 192 ENGAGEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 TRANSLATION ISSUES . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 DISCUSSION. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 ENDNOTES '"
,. 218 REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 218 INTERNET REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 219 11 BIOTECHNOLOGY, NANOTECHNOLOGY, MEDIA, AND PUBLIC
OPINION , 221 SUSANNA PRIEST INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 PROBLEMATIZING THE CATEGORIES . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 MEDIA AND PUBLIC OPINION. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF"THE PUBLIC" .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 DISCUSSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 ENDNOTES. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 REFERENCES. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 PART 5 LOOKING
FORWARD TO THE NANO SITUATION. . . . . . . 235 CONTENTS IX 12 13 LESSONS
FROM THE BIO-DECADE: A SOCIAL SDENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GEORGE GASKEIL INTRODUCTION .
UNDERSTANDING THE PROCESS OFINNOVATION . QUESTIONING SOUND SCIENCE .
PERSPECTIVES ON RISK . MENACING IMAGES AND MAGICAL THINKING .
UNCERTAINTY AND ANXIETY . WEIGHING UP GAINS AND LOSSES . TRUTH CLAIMS
AND COMMUNICATING SCIENCE . CHANGING SCIENCE, CHANGING SOCIETIES .
IMPLICATIONS FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY . REFERENCES . WHAT CAN NANOTECHNOLOGY
LEARN FROM BIOTECHNOLOGY? . LAWRENCE BUSCH ANDJOHN R. LLOYD INTRODUCTION
. SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION . THE PROCESS OFINNOVATION OFNEW PRODUCTS IN
BIOTECHNOLOGY . PROCESSES OFVARIABLE REGULATION OFBIOTECHNOLOGY . FUROR
OVER BOVINE GROWTH HORMONE . THE MAJOR ACTORS . RECENT DEVELOPMENTS .
CONCLUSIONS: LESSONS IDENTIFIED . ENDNOTES . REFERENCES . INTERNET
REFERENCES . 237 237 239 242 245 248 249 250 253 256 257 257 261 261 263
265 266 267 268 272 273 274 274 276 APPENDIX I A PRIMER ON GENETIC
ENGINEERING. . . . . . . . 277 APPENDIX 11 REPORT FROM THE STANDARDS FOR
NANOTECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285
APPENDIX 111 LIST OFABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
APPENDIX IV PARTICIPANTS AT FIRST INTERNATIONAL IFAS CONFERENCE ON
NANOTECHNOLOGY "WHAT CAN NANO LEARN FROM BIO?". . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . 323 APPENDIX V PARTICIPANTS IN THE "STANDARDS FOR
NANOTECHNOLOGY" WORKSHOP, 2006. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327 INDEX. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
330 SERIES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 341 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023243177 |
callnumber-first | T - Technology |
callnumber-label | TP248 |
callnumber-raw | TP248.25.N35 |
callnumber-search | TP248.25.N35 |
callnumber-sort | TP 3248.25 N35 |
callnumber-subject | TP - Chemical Technology |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)191752281 (DE-599)BVBBV023243177 |
dewey-full | 174.96205 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 174 - Occupational ethics |
dewey-raw | 174.96205 |
dewey-search | 174.96205 |
dewey-sort | 3174.96205 |
dewey-tens | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
discipline | Philosophie |
discipline_str_mv | Philosophie |
edition | 1. ed. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02667nam a2200637 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023243177</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080708 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080407s2008 ad|| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="015" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBA812915</subfield><subfield code="2">dnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780123739902</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-12-373990-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">012373990X</subfield><subfield code="9">0-12-373990-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)191752281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023243177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TP248.25.N35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">174.96205</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology?</subfield><subfield code="b">social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by Kenneth David ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Elsevier/ Academic Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVIII, 342 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Food science and technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnology / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnology / Social aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetically modified foods / Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agricultural biotechnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agricultural biotechnology</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Biotechnology</subfield><subfield code="x">ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Food, Genetically Modified</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genetically modified foods</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnology</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnology</subfield><subfield code="x">Social aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnology</subfield><subfield code="x">ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftstransfer</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4207539-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132508-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4327470-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Biotechnologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069491-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nanotechnologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4327470-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132508-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015602-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Biotechnologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069491-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftstransfer</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4207539-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="C">b</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David, Kenneth</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">OEBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016428683&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016428683</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
id | DE-604.BV023243177 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T20:24:38Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:13:57Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780123739902 012373990X |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016428683 |
oclc_num | 191752281 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | XVIII, 342 S. Ill., graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 2008 |
publishDateSearch | 2008 |
publishDateSort | 2008 |
publisher | Elsevier/ Academic Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Food science and technology |
spelling | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs ed. by Kenneth David ... 1. ed. London [u.a.] Elsevier/ Academic Press 2008 XVIII, 342 S. Ill., graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Food science and technology Nanotechnology / Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology / Social aspects Genetically modified foods / Moral and ethical aspects Agricultural biotechnology Ethik Gesellschaft Agricultural biotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Biotechnology ethics Food, Genetically Modified Genetically modified foods Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Social aspects Nanotechnology ethics Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd rswk-swf Wissenschaftstransfer (DE-588)4207539-7 gnd rswk-swf Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt (DE-588)4132508-4 gnd rswk-swf Nanotechnologie (DE-588)4327470-5 gnd rswk-swf Biotechnologie (DE-588)4069491-4 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Nanotechnologie (DE-588)4327470-5 s Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt (DE-588)4132508-4 s Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 s Biotechnologie (DE-588)4069491-4 s Wissenschaftstransfer (DE-588)4207539-7 s b DE-604 David, Kenneth Sonstige oth OEBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016428683&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs Nanotechnology / Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology / Social aspects Genetically modified foods / Moral and ethical aspects Agricultural biotechnology Ethik Gesellschaft Agricultural biotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Biotechnology ethics Food, Genetically Modified Genetically modified foods Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Social aspects Nanotechnology ethics Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Wissenschaftstransfer (DE-588)4207539-7 gnd Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt (DE-588)4132508-4 gnd Nanotechnologie (DE-588)4327470-5 gnd Biotechnologie (DE-588)4069491-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4015602-3 (DE-588)4207539-7 (DE-588)4132508-4 (DE-588)4327470-5 (DE-588)4069491-4 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
title | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs |
title_auth | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs |
title_exact_search | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs |
title_exact_search_txtP | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs |
title_full | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs ed. by Kenneth David ... |
title_fullStr | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs ed. by Kenneth David ... |
title_full_unstemmed | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs ed. by Kenneth David ... |
title_short | What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology? |
title_sort | what can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and gmos |
title_sub | social and ethical lessons for nanoscience from the debate over agrifood biotechnology and GMOs |
topic | Nanotechnology / Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology / Social aspects Genetically modified foods / Moral and ethical aspects Agricultural biotechnology Ethik Gesellschaft Agricultural biotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Biotechnology ethics Food, Genetically Modified Genetically modified foods Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Social aspects Nanotechnology ethics Ethik (DE-588)4015602-3 gnd Wissenschaftstransfer (DE-588)4207539-7 gnd Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt (DE-588)4132508-4 gnd Nanotechnologie (DE-588)4327470-5 gnd Biotechnologie (DE-588)4069491-4 gnd |
topic_facet | Nanotechnology / Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology / Social aspects Genetically modified foods / Moral and ethical aspects Agricultural biotechnology Ethik Gesellschaft Agricultural biotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Biotechnology ethics Food, Genetically Modified Genetically modified foods Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Moral and ethical aspects Nanotechnology Social aspects Nanotechnology ethics Wissenschaftstransfer Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt Nanotechnologie Biotechnologie Aufsatzsammlung |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016428683&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidkenneth whatcannanotechnologylearnfrombiotechnologysocialandethicallessonsfornanosciencefromthedebateoveragrifoodbiotechnologyandgmos |