Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban: etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Hungarian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Debrecen
Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó
2004
|
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Literaturverz. S. 295 - 341. - Inhaltsverz. und Zsfassung in engl. Sprache |
| Beschreibung: | 351 S. Ill., Kt. |
| ISBN: | 9634727972 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023232353 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20080416 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080401s2004 ab|| |||| 00||| hun d | ||
| 020 | |a 9634727972 |9 963-472-797-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)255419345 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ253852137 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a hun | |
| 049 | |a DE-473 | ||
| 084 | |a LB 48000 |0 (DE-625)90563:772 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Keményfi, Róbert |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban |b etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei |c Keményfi Róbert |
| 264 | 1 | |a Debrecen |b Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó |c 2004 | |
| 300 | |a 351 S. |b Ill., Kt. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverz. S. 295 - 341. - Inhaltsverz. und Zsfassung in engl. Sprache | ||
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bamberg |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016418049&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016418049 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137525540814849 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents
and Resume
Geographical approach in ethnography*
Analyzing ethnic and religious spaces, contact-zones
PROLOGUE
........................................................................................................................................11
INTRODUCTION
...............................................................................................................................15
The volume presents the methodological relationship between ethnic and religio-geographical researches,
and ethnography. It addresses the question of common research issues where the two disciplines can cooperate
effectively, and identifies the
-
often very slight
-
methodological fault-lines along which the two disciplines
researches of ethnic and denominational space-structures can be marked off. Furthermore, relying on the first
part of the work, where actual research-examples and common eras of science-history are presented, in the
closing chapter this volume drains up the network of ethnic and denominational studies in ethnography and
geography.
ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS SPATIAL CATEGORIES
.............................................................................19
In researches of space-structures a unified conceptual system has been developed, which proves to be use¬
ful both for ethnography and for geography. This conceptual framework is based on the threefold, yet perme¬
able division of spatial levels (macro-,
meso-
and micro-level)
.
The elements of this conceptual system (eg.:
place, region, diaspora, sacral space) are at the same time of geographical nature and function as norms, cog¬
nitive values or social networks, and thus can express the common spatial-category of the two disciplines.
1.
The unified conceptual network of ethnic and religious spatial studies
—
level ranking and permeability
.......................................................................................................19
2.
Common spatial categories
...........................................................................................................31
a) on the concepts of place
..............................................................................................................31
b) on the concepts of diaspora
.........................................................................................................31
S.Special
spatial categories in ethnic and religious studies
..............................................................33
a) sacral landscape (sacral space)
.....................................................................................................34
To the concept of sacred
..................................................................................................................35
To the concept of sacred space
..........................................................................................................38
The relative space
......................................................................................................................38
The absolute space
.....................................................................................................................39
*
Unlike works following the practice of English speaking countries, this volume uses the term „Eth¬
nography not as a method, but as a discipline dealing with the culture of traditional communities, ac¬
cording to the practice observed in Central Europe.
347
b)
Is there
a
concept
of
„ethnie
landscape ?
.....................................................................................40
1.
„Ethnic landscape in the absolute space
........................................................................................41
2.
The ideological roots of interpreting the „ethnic landscape
.............................................................44
3.
The ethnic landscape in mental space
.............................................................................................48
II. MACRO-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS SPACES
.................................................51
The chapter, as being adaptive to the division according to spatial levels, using the European Greek
Catholic region at the macro-level almost as an illustration, attempts to give a comprehensive view of the po¬
tentials of analyzing religious and ethnic spaces. It investigates how the studying of religious spaces fits into
the scientific arguments on the theory offault-lines of civilization, and into the task of defining the concepts
of Eastern and Central Europe.
The Central European Greek Catholic example
1...........................................................................51
The frameworks of European Greek Catholic space
.......................................................................53
Analyzing the correspondence between nation-state space and religious space
...............................60
Can we outline the concept of „nation of religion in Europe?
.........................................................66
Recording ethnic and religious affiliation and measuring ethnicity and religiosity
........................67
This chapter shows how conceptions of ethnic or religious affiliations ensure or not ensure measurability.
The various approaches (ethnicity conceptions) of ethnic studies and the numerous concepts of „nation
(state-nation, culture-nation, nation of religion) diversely relate to the question of measurability, thus pro¬
viding different opportunities of spatial representation.
The concept and space of ethnicity in researching ethnic space-structures
......................................68
Macro-level thinking
......................................................................................................................76
Divergences of ethnic and religious minority(group)s
in state-nation and culture-nation thinking
...................................................................................76
1.
State-nation
.........................................................................................................................76
2.
Culture-nation
.......................................................................................................................79
3.
„Sacred/Holy ethnicity
............................................................................................................83
I/a the Churches
...................................................................................................................86
1/b the State
..........................................................................................................................86
The differences of the concepts of nationalities and national minorities
in state-nation and culture-nation thinking
...................................................................................87
1.
State-nation
...........................................................................................................................87
2.
Culture-nation
.......................................................................................................................88
Meso-
and micro-level thinking
.....................................................................................................90
1.
Ethnic affiliation
.....................................................................................................................91
Ethnic measuring methods at the
meso—
and micro-levels in culture-nations
...................................92
Approaches to
dej
ining and measuring the Gypsy population
...................................................94
2.
Religiosity, religious affiliation
..................................................................................................99
Approaches to defining and measuring the Jew population
.......................................................100
3.
The range of authenticity of the measured data ofethn icity and religiosity
....................................103
Differences of measurability between the dimensions of „ethnicity and religiosity
.......................105
The spatial projection of,,ethnicity and religiosity based on possible, measured data
....................106
Characteristics of presenting ethnic and religious spaces
..............................................................108
The conceptions of ethnic and religious studies that accept measurability apply map-representation. This
chapter presents the major characteristics of mapping (iconic, universal, abstract, static), their potentials and
limitations, while introducing the history (the relationship of space and ideology) and the ways of represen¬
tation (colour preferences) of the method.
348
The maps
.....................................................................................................................................108
Space and ideology
.......................................................................................................................109
a) ethnic maps, maps of nationalities
..............................................................................................109
b) confessional maps
......................................................................................................................116
c, Colour preferences of ethnic and confessional maps
.......................................................................120
d, The Greek Catholic space as an ideological spatial unit
................................................................142
Transitions: confessional maps from ethnic spaces
........................................................................152
IIl.MESO-AND MICRO-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS SPACES
...........................153
According to spatial division, the field of analysis at the meso-level is the county and the region, while at
the micro-level it is the settlement —from a social aspect the former is the field of community-making and
the latter is that of the small community (the family):
A) Creating local religious and local ethnic space-models
.......................................................153
Ethnic and religious studies have created several spatial models to portray the spatiality of the local cul¬
tural system. Activity-space represents the unbound, though measurable structure of space determined by spa¬
tial movement. The analysis of more bound structures of spatial objects belongs to the field of cultural ecology.
1.
Activity-spaces
..........................................................................................................................153
2.
Consolidated sacral and ethnic space-structures
........................................................................154
a) Cultural ecological-ecological anthropology: complex spatial models
.............................................155
b) Other spatial types of religious and ethnic phenomena
..................................................................165
B, Mental spaces, proxemic codes
..................................................................................................174
The use of space as mental experience and as sign-system
.............................................................174
Apart from the local spatial models, it is cognitive mapping andproxemics that represent the other ap¬
proach to ethnic and religious spatial models, since those two investigate ethnic and religious affiliation in
the context of the cognitive mapping (symbolization, interpretation) of space. The two methods can be ap¬
plied in investigating ethnicity, or ethnic and religious identity.
a) Mental spaces
............................................................................................................................174
b) Proxemic code
...........................................................................................................................184
C) Statistical-geographical method
...............................................................................................186
From the era between the two World Wars, most factual settlement-researches were related to this
method (and to its subtypes) in Hungarian science history. The method combines qualitative and quantita¬
tive (archival resources, statistics, closed-question censuses) practices. On the one hand it applies methods of
ethnographical field-work to refine data, and on the other hand it provides a background through statistical
data and the drawing up aframed space-structure
.....................................................................................
Presenting the method
.................................................................................................................186
Historical spatial-structural analysis of
Nationalities (ethnic groups) and denominations
.........................................................................192
1.
Comparative method
.................................................................................................................192
2.
Indirect analytic method
............................................................................................................193
a) Reconstruction on the basis of basically written sources
............................................................193
Archival and other ethnic sources
..........................................................................................193
Archival and other confessional sources
...................................................................................196
Archival and other, but not ethnic or confessional sources
..........................................................201
Possible utilization of military mensuration
...........................................................................202
The historicalchange of the spatialsituation ofthe Gypsy population
........................................202
The historical change of ethnic space-structures
.......................................................................209
b) Reconstruction on the basis of basically verbal information
......................................................211
3.
Mixed method, or the type of „complete temporal reconstruction
...................................................217
349
The synthetic overview of the statistical-geographical method
.....................................................221
a, The applicability of the method
.................................................................................................221
b, „Outlook to the meso-level
.......................................................................................................223
1.
example: The drawing of the real ethnic borderline
in the historical counties
Gömör
and Kis-Hont
...........................................................................223
2.
example: The space-structure of the population s distribution
according to nationalities in the
Lévai
district
...........................................................................224
D) The possibility of synthesis
.......................................................................................................225
It is only the chosen purpose of the analysis that determines the most effective method to apply:
1.
Spati-
ality is present as an explanatory background;
2.
the analysis of spatial-structures is a means of studying
other cultural manifestations;
3.
the purpose is to research spatiality itself.
E) The Central European Unite/Greek Catholic example
2.........................................................228
Through the investigation of the ethnic space-structure ofTranscarpathia the chapter delineates the pos¬
sibility of analysing ethnic and religious spatial processes at
meso-
f
the level oj the landscape, the region) and
micro-level (the level of settlements). Researches show that border-shiftings present at the regional level, and
the historical changes of the ethnic and religious composition do show up in the micro-level of spatiality and
at the level of local societies.
F) The Central European Greek Catholic example
3.....................................................................244
IV. SYNTHETIC PRESENTATION OF THE SITUATION.
GEOGRAPHICAL APPROACH IN ETHNOGRAPHY
The possibly common and different questions of ethnic and religious spatiality
................................249
Relying on the previous chapters, the closing part of the book offers an overall, synthesis of the unique
network of the tracks of ethnography and geography focusing on ethnic and religious issues. The chapter in¬
terprets disciplinary border-areas: what kind oj new problems openjor analysis, what kind of new research
methods, emerge in the field of ethnography.
The traditional system of the two disciplines (geography
-
ethnography)
.....................................250
A) General level
...........................................................................................................................250
In the 18 th century when interest toward popular culture started to emerge, descriptive ethnography cre¬
ated a link to the geography of the age. However, the broadening knowledge of the age soon made people real¬
ize that the Humboldtian thinking which studied the whole of the Nature was no longer sufficient, and thus
the common point between the two disciplines, brought about by the osculatory nature, the „superficial com¬
plexity of percipient description, ceased to exist for good.
B) Level transition: seeds of the regional aspect
-human geography as an interdisciplinary linkage
........................................................................253
Because of its local nature and sphere, the human geography of the 1880s became the field of geography
that necessarily sought relationship with ethnography. On the other hand ethnography itself could not ignore
the results of human geography when investigating the unique culture of a given region or settlement, al¬
though it could not deal with ethnic and confessional mapping or with the statistical data of quantitative
categories.
C) Regional level
-
landscape-studies as the actual area of common researches
.............................263
The widening regional geographical researches and the implied conceptualization of the study of the
landscape resulted in the strengthening the linkages between ethnography and geography. Hungarian geog¬
raphy between the two World Wars took in the German landscape-conception, furthermore, through the
evaluation of the peculiar conditions of the Carpathian Basin, it elevated that into the core of the complex
Hungarian geographical approach. As the science of the social components of the „countryside , ethnography
naturally joined in the on-going regional/landscape studies.
350
The relationship between geography and ethnography after orld ar
..................................269
A) The three decades after
1945...................................................................................................269
The Communist regime in Hungary regarded researches aimed at the spatial/areal characteristics of eth¬
nic phenomena a real threat to internationalism. Of course, studying religious space-structures in an atheist
state was also non-desirable, ntil the mid-SOs only three /inks preserved connection between geography
and ethnography: ethnographical mapping, the geography of settlements, and the regional monographs and
analyses in a broader sense.
B) On the linkages of the last two decades until today
.................................................................273
During the last decades geography recognized society as the primary space-forming factor today, -while
ethnography also had to re-interpret concepts related to territoriality. Nowadays one cannot speak about es¬
sential differences in the applied methods of the two disciplines. Only special purposes of research determine
■which discipline s conceptual and methodical equipment is more effective in mapping the spatiality of the
given social phenomenon.
C) Ethnic geography-ethnography
.............................................................................................278
The questions raised by ethnic spatiality reappeared in the second half of the
1
980s. Ethno-geography
started refining maps drawn on the basis of the data of official censuses, while ethnography set to comple¬
ment the nationality data missing in geography. From the second half of the
1980s
both geography and eth¬
nography recognized the lack of studies focused on minority and nationality networks.
D) Ethnography of religion —geography of religion
.....................................................................281
After World War II the meagre religio-geographical researches in Hungary shifted into the area of eth¬
nography of religion unperceived, and works analyzing the spatiality of religiosity first appeared in ethnog¬
raphy. Although the two disciplines can hardly be distinguished nowadays, they differ in the research
target-groups.
Ethnography-geography: connections, parallels-outlook
....................................................2
From time to time geography and ethnography rely on each other s results and follow the changes of the
other discipline to various extents. However, the relationship between the two disciplines should not be over¬
estimated: ethnography s subject and its methodological resources are rooted in several disciplines. Only the se¬
lected approach determines which dimension of the scientific network of ethnography is presented.
EPILOGUE
......................................................................................................................................293
BIBLIOGRAPHY
..............................................................................................................................295
List of illustrations
...........................................................................................................................343
RESUME
..........................................................................................................................................347
351
|
| adam_txt |
Contents
and Resume
Geographical approach in ethnography*
Analyzing ethnic and religious spaces, contact-zones
PROLOGUE
.11
INTRODUCTION
.15
The volume presents the methodological relationship between ethnic and religio-geographical researches,
and ethnography. It addresses the question of common research issues where the two disciplines can cooperate
effectively, and identifies the
-
often very slight
-
methodological fault-lines along which the two disciplines'
researches of ethnic and denominational space-structures can be marked off. Furthermore, relying on the first
part of the work, "where actual research-examples and common eras of science-history are presented, in the
closing chapter this volume drains up the network of ethnic and denominational studies in ethnography and
geography.
ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS SPATIAL CATEGORIES
.19
In researches of space-structures a unified conceptual system has been developed, which proves to be use¬
ful both for ethnography and for geography. This conceptual framework is based on the threefold, yet perme¬
able division of spatial levels (macro-,
meso-
and micro-level)
.
The elements of this conceptual system (eg.:
place, region, diaspora, sacral space) are at the same time of geographical nature and function as norms, cog¬
nitive values or social networks, and thus can express the common spatial-category of the two disciplines.
1.
The unified conceptual network of ethnic and religious spatial studies
—
level ranking and permeability
.19
2.
Common spatial categories
.31
a) on the concepts of place
.31
b) on the concepts of diaspora
.31
S.Special
spatial categories in ethnic and religious studies
.33
a) sacral landscape (sacral space)
.34
To the concept of sacred
.35
To the concept of sacred space
.38
The relative space
.38
The absolute space
.39
*
Unlike works following the practice of English speaking countries, this volume uses the term „Eth¬
nography" not as a method, but as a discipline dealing with the culture of traditional communities, ac¬
cording to the practice observed in Central Europe.
347
b)
Is there
a
concept
of
„ethnie
landscape"?
.40
1.
„Ethnic landscape" in the absolute space
.41
2.
The ideological'roots of'interpreting the „ethnic landscape"
.44
3.
The ethnic landscape in mental space
.48
II. MACRO-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS SPACES
.51
The chapter, as being adaptive to the division according to spatial levels, using the European Greek
Catholic region at the macro-level almost as an illustration, attempts to give a comprehensive view of the po¬
tentials of analyzing religious and ethnic spaces. It investigates how the studying of religious spaces fits into
the scientific arguments on the theory offault-lines of civilization, and into the task of defining the concepts
of Eastern and Central Europe.
The Central European Greek Catholic example
1.51
The frameworks of European Greek Catholic space
.53
Analyzing the correspondence between nation-state space and religious space
.60
Can we outline the concept of „nation of religion" in Europe?
.66
Recording ethnic and religious affiliation and measuring ethnicity and religiosity
.67
This chapter shows how conceptions of ethnic or religious affiliations ensure or not ensure measurability.
The various approaches (ethnicity conceptions) of ethnic studies and the numerous concepts of „nation"
(state-nation, culture-nation, nation of religion) diversely relate to the question of measurability, thus pro¬
viding different opportunities of spatial representation.
The concept and space of ethnicity in researching ethnic space-structures
.68
Macro-level thinking
.76
Divergences of ethnic and religious minority(group)s
in state-nation and culture-nation thinking
.76
1.
State-nation
.76
2.
Culture-nation
.79
3.
„Sacred/Holy ethnicity"
.83
I/a the Churches
.86
1/b the State
.86
The differences of the concepts of nationalities and national minorities
in state-nation and culture-nation thinking
.87
1.
State-nation
.87
2.
Culture-nation
.88
Meso-
and micro-level thinking
.90
1.
Ethnic affiliation
.91
Ethnic measuring methods at the
meso—
and micro-levels in culture-nations
.92
Approaches to
dej
'ining and measuring the Gypsy population
.94
2.
Religiosity, religious affiliation
.99
Approaches to defining and measuring the Jew population
.100
3.
The range of authenticity of the measured data ofethn icity and religiosity
.103
Differences of measurability between the dimensions of „ethnicity" and religiosity
.105
The spatial projection of,,ethnicity"and religiosity based on possible, measured data
.106
Characteristics of presenting ethnic and religious spaces
.108
The conceptions of ethnic and religious studies that accept measurability apply map-representation. This
chapter presents the major characteristics of mapping (iconic, universal, abstract, static), their potentials and
limitations, while introducing the history (the relationship of space and ideology) and the ways of represen¬
tation (colour preferences) of the method.
348
The maps
.108
Space and ideology
.109
a) ethnic maps, maps of nationalities
.109
b) confessional maps
.116
c, Colour preferences of ethnic and confessional maps
.120
d, The Greek Catholic space as an ideological spatial unit
.142
Transitions: confessional maps from ethnic spaces
.152
IIl.MESO-AND MICRO-LEVEL ANALYSIS OF ETHNIC AND RELIGIOUS SPACES
.153
According to spatial division, the field of analysis at the meso-level is the county and the region, while at
the micro-level it is the settlement —from a social aspect the former is the field of community-making and
the latter is that of the small community (the family):
A) Creating local religious and local ethnic space-models
.153
Ethnic and religious studies have created several spatial models to portray the spatiality of the local cul¬
tural system. Activity-space represents the unbound, though measurable structure of space determined by spa¬
tial movement. The analysis of more bound structures of spatial objects belongs to the field of cultural ecology.
1.
Activity-spaces
.153
2.
Consolidated sacral and ethnic space-structures
.154
a) Cultural ecological-ecological anthropology: complex spatial models
.155
b) Other spatial types of religious and ethnic phenomena
.165
B, Mental spaces, proxemic codes
.174
The use of space as mental experience and as sign-system
.174
Apart from the local spatial models, it is cognitive mapping andproxemics that represent the other ap¬
proach to ethnic and religious spatial models, since those two investigate ethnic and religious affiliation in
the context of the cognitive mapping (symbolization, interpretation) of space. The two methods can be ap¬
plied in investigating ethnicity, or ethnic and religious identity.
a) Mental spaces
.174
b) Proxemic code
.184
C) Statistical-geographical method
.186
From the era between the two World Wars, most factual settlement-researches were related to this
method (and to its subtypes) in Hungarian science history. The method combines qualitative and quantita¬
tive (archival resources, statistics, closed-question censuses) practices. On the one hand it applies methods of
ethnographical field-work to refine data, and on the other hand it provides a background through statistical
data and the drawing up aframed'space-structure
.
Presenting the method
.186
Historical spatial-structural analysis of
Nationalities (ethnic groups) and denominations
.192
1.
Comparative method
.192
2.
Indirect analytic method
.193
a) Reconstruction on the basis of basically written sources
.193
Archival and other ethnic sources
.193
Archival and other confessional sources
.196
Archival and other, but not ethnic or confessional sources
.201
Possible utilization of military mensuration
.202
The historicalchange of'the spatialsituation ofthe Gypsy population
.202
The historical change of ethnic space-structures
.209
b) Reconstruction on the basis of basically verbal information
.211
3.
Mixed method, or the type of „complete temporal reconstruction"
.217
349
The synthetic overview of the statistical-geographical method
.221
a, The applicability of the method
.221
b, „Outlook"to the meso-level
.223
1.
example: The drawing of the real ethnic borderline
in the historical counties
Gömör
and Kis-Hont
.223
2.
example: The space-structure of the population's distribution
according to nationalities in the
Lévai
district
.224
D) The possibility of synthesis
.225
It is only the chosen purpose of the analysis that determines the most effective method to apply:
1.
Spati-
ality is present as an explanatory background;
2.
the analysis of spatial-structures is a means of studying
other cultural manifestations;
3.
the purpose is to research spatiality itself.
E) The Central European Unite/Greek Catholic example
2.228
Through the investigation of the ethnic space-structure ofTranscarpathia the chapter delineates the pos¬
sibility of analysing ethnic and religious spatial processes at
meso-
f
the level oj the landscape, the region) and
micro-level (the level of settlements). Researches show that border-shiftings present at the regional level, and
the historical changes of the ethnic and religious composition do show up in the micro-level of spatiality and
at the level of local societies.
F) The Central European Greek Catholic example
3.244
IV. SYNTHETIC PRESENTATION OF THE SITUATION.
GEOGRAPHICAL APPROACH IN ETHNOGRAPHY
The possibly common and different questions of ethnic and religious spatiality
.249
Relying on the previous chapters, the closing part of the book offers an overall, synthesis of the unique
network of the tracks of ethnography and geography focusing on ethnic and religious issues. The chapter in¬
terprets disciplinary border-areas: what kind oj new problems openjor analysis, what kind of new research
methods, emerge in the field of ethnography.
The traditional system of the two disciplines (geography
-
ethnography)
.250
A) General level
.250
In the 18 th century when interest toward popular culture started to emerge, descriptive ethnography cre¬
ated a link to the geography of the age. However, the broadening knowledge of the age soon made people real¬
ize that the Humboldtian thinking which studied the whole of the Nature was no longer sufficient, and thus
the common point between the two disciplines, brought about by the osculatory nature, the „superficial com¬
plexity" of percipient description, ceased to exist for good.
B) Level transition: seeds of the regional aspect
-human geography as an interdisciplinary linkage
.253
Because of its local nature and sphere, the human geography of the 1880s became the field of geography
that necessarily sought relationship with ethnography. On the other hand ethnography itself could not ignore
the results of human geography when investigating the unique culture of a given region or settlement, al¬
though it "could not deal with" ethnic and confessional mapping or with the statistical data of quantitative
categories.
C) Regional level
-
landscape-studies as the actual area of common researches
.263
The widening regional geographical researches and the implied conceptualization of the study of the
landscape resulted in the strengthening the linkages between ethnography and geography. Hungarian geog¬
raphy between the two World Wars took in the German landscape-conception, furthermore, through the
evaluation of the peculiar conditions of the Carpathian Basin, it elevated that into the core of the complex
Hungarian geographical approach. As the science of the social components of the „countryside", ethnography
naturally joined in the on-going regional/landscape studies.
350
The relationship between geography and ethnography after orld ar
.269
A) The three decades after
1945.269
The Communist regime in Hungary regarded researches aimed at the spatial/areal characteristics of eth¬
nic phenomena a real threat to internationalism. Of course, studying religious space-structures in an atheist
state was also non-desirable, ntil the mid-SOs only three /inks preserved connection between geography
and ethnography: ethnographical mapping, the geography of settlements, and the regional monographs and
analyses in a broader sense.
B) On the linkages of the last two decades until today
.273
During the last decades geography recognized society as the primary space-forming factor today, -while
ethnography also had to re-interpret concepts related to territoriality. Nowadays one cannot speak about es¬
sential differences in the applied methods of the two disciplines. Only special purposes of research determine
■which discipline's conceptual and methodical equipment is more effective in mapping the spatiality of the
given social phenomenon.
C) Ethnic geography-ethnography
.278
The questions raised by ethnic spatiality reappeared in the second half of the
1
980s. Ethno-geography
started refining maps drawn on the basis of the data of official censuses, while ethnography set to comple¬
ment the nationality data missing in geography. From the second half of the
1980s
both geography and eth¬
nography recognized the lack of studies focused on minority and nationality networks.
D) Ethnography of religion —geography of religion
.281
After World War II the meagre religio-geographical researches in Hungary shifted into the area of eth¬
nography of religion unperceived, and works analyzing the spatiality of religiosity first appeared in ethnog¬
raphy. Although the two disciplines can hardly be distinguished nowadays, they differ in the research
target-groups.
Ethnography-geography: connections, parallels-outlook
.2
From time to time geography and ethnography rely on each other's results and follow the changes of the
other discipline to various extents. However, the relationship between the two disciplines should not be over¬
estimated: ethnography's subject and its methodological resources are rooted in several disciplines. Only the se¬
lected approach determines which dimension of the scientific network of ethnography is presented.
EPILOGUE
.293
BIBLIOGRAPHY
.295
List of illustrations
.343
RESUME
.347
351 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Keményfi, Róbert |
| author_facet | Keményfi, Róbert |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Keményfi, Róbert |
| author_variant | r k rk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023232353 |
| classification_rvk | LB 48000 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255419345 (DE-599)BSZ253852137 |
| discipline | Sozial-/Kulturanthropologie / Empirische Kulturwissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Sozial-/Kulturanthropologie / Empirische Kulturwissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01194nam a2200289 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023232353</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080416 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080401s2004 ab|| |||| 00||| hun d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9634727972</subfield><subfield code="9">963-472-797-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255419345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ253852137</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">hun</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LB 48000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)90563:772</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keményfi, Róbert</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban</subfield><subfield code="b">etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei</subfield><subfield code="c">Keményfi Róbert</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Debrecen</subfield><subfield code="b">Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">351 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., Kt.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverz. S. 295 - 341. - Inhaltsverz. und Zsfassung in engl. Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bamberg</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016418049&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016418049</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV023232353 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T20:20:25Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:13:41Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9634727972 |
| language | Hungarian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016418049 |
| oclc_num | 255419345 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 351 S. Ill., Kt. |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSearch | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Keményfi, Róbert Verfasser aut Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei Keményfi Róbert Debrecen Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Egyetemi Kiadó 2004 351 S. Ill., Kt. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Literaturverz. S. 295 - 341. - Inhaltsverz. und Zsfassung in engl. Sprache Digitalisierung UB Bamberg application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016418049&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Keményfi, Róbert Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei |
| title | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei |
| title_auth | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei |
| title_exact_search | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei |
| title_full | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei Keményfi Róbert |
| title_fullStr | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei Keményfi Róbert |
| title_full_unstemmed | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei Keményfi Róbert |
| title_short | Földrajzi szemlélet a néprajztudományban |
| title_sort | foldrajzi szemlelet a neprajztudomanyban etnikai es felekezeti terek kontaktzonak elemzesi lehetosegei |
| title_sub | etnikai és felekezeti terek, kontaktzónák elemzési lehetőségei |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016418049&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kemenyfirobert foldrajziszemleletaneprajztudomanybanetnikaiesfelekezetiterekkontaktzonakelemzesilehetosegei |