International litigation in intellectual property and information technology: European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Austin [u.a.]
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
2008
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Kluwer law international
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXIII, 311 S. |
| ISBN: | 9789041127020 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023126138 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20080826 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080212s2008 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789041127020 |9 978-90-411-2702-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)230917128 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023126138 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJE983.I583 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 340.9 |2 22 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a International litigation in intellectual property and information technology |b European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology |c ed., Arnaud. Nuyts ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a Austin [u.a.] |b Wolters Kluwer Law & Business |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a XXIII, 311 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Kluwer law international | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws |x Intellectual property |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intellectual property |z European Union countries | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nuyts, Arnaud |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016328546&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016328546 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137397575745536 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORS NOTE XV TABLE OF CASES XVII CHAPTER 1
CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION IN IP/IT MATTERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE
TRANSFORMATION OF THE JURISDICTIONAL LANDSCAPE 1 ARNAUD NUYTS, KATARZYNA
SZYCHOWSKA AND NIKITAS HATZIMIHAIL I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. FROM STRICT
TERRITORIALITY TO CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION 4 A. TERRITORIALITY OF RIGHTS
MATCHED WITH TERRITORIALITY OF PROCEDURE 4 B. THE CHANGE OF THINKING
BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 6 III. THE CROSS-BORDER
LITIGATION MACHINERY 9 A. HOW THE MACHINERY STARTED 9 1. CROSS-BORDER
INJUNCTIONS 9 2. JURISDICTION OVER JOINT DEFENDANTS 13 3. RECOGNITION
AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 16 B. HOW IT GOT BLOCKED AND WAS
THEN FIXED 17 1. ABUSE OF JOINDERS AND REMEDIES FROM DOMESTIC COURTS 18
2. PRE-EMPTIVE LITIGATION AND REMEDIES FROM DOMESTIC COURTS 20 C. AND
HOW IT GOT BLOCKED AGAIN 26 1. STUMBLING BLOCK: HOW TO SEVER THE
VALIDITY FROM THE INFRINGEMENT? 26 2. IS THERE ANY WEB FOR THE SPIDER?
30 D. HEADING FOR THE FUTURE: INSTEAD OF FIXING THE MACHINERY, SETTING
UP A NEW ONE? 33 IV. COPYRIGHT LITIGATION UNDER THE BRUSSELS REGIME 35
V. IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON THE LITIGATION OF IP RIGHTS UNDER
THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION/REGULATION 39 VI. CONCLUSION 46 VIII TABLE OF
CONTENTS CHAPTER 2 THE COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK FOR CROSS-BORDER INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LITIGATION 49 JEAN-SYLVESTRE BERGE
I. INTRODUCTION 49 II. YESTERDAY: INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PRIOR TO THE
DEVELOPMENT OF AN EU FRAMEWORK 50 A. INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS 50 B.
INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION STRICTLY SPEAKING 51 III. TODAY: CHANGES IN
INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION DUE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EU FRAMEWORK 52
A. ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EU FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 52 B.
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
LAW 53 C. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK FOR PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW 53 D. THE CHANGING FACE OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION 54
IV. TOMORROW: WHAT TYPE OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION AND WHAT TYPE OF
COMMUNITY LAW CAN BE EXPECTED? 55 APPENDIX 57 I. INTERNATIONAL
MULTILATERAL TEXTS SPECIFIC TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 57 II. COMMUNITY
TEXTS SPECIFIC TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 58 III. COMMUNITY TEXTS SPECIFIC
TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 59 IV. COMMUNITY TEXTS SPECIFIC TO
INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW CONTAINING PROVISIONS RELATING TO INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 59 CHAPTER 3 THE WIDENING REACH OF
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION: WHERE CAN YOU LITIGATE IP RIGHTS AFTER GAT? 61
PAUL L. C. TORREMANS I. INTRODUCTION 61 II. THE JUDGMENT 62 A. A
SOMEWHAT UNUSUAL FACTUAL BASIS 62 B. THE CASE BEFORE THE GERMAN COURTS
62 C. THE COURT OF JUSTICE GOES BACK TO DUIJNSTEE 63 D. THE QUESTIONABLE
LINK WITH NATIONAL OFFICES AND NATIONAL LAW 65 E. ARTICLE 22 AND ITS
POSITION IN THE SCHEME OF THE REGULATION 66 F. FURTHER POINTS RAISED IN
SUPPORT OF ITS APPROACH BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE 69 III. THE POSITION
ADOPTED BY THE COURT 71 TABLE OF CONTENTS IX IV. THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE
JUDGMENT 72 A. PATENT CASES 72 B. POLICY 72 C. OTHER REGISTERED RIGHTS
73 V. TOWARDS A SOLUTION 74 A. OBJECTIVES 74 B. THE ROLE OF ARTICLES 2
AND 5 74 C. THE ROLE OF ARTICLE 22 75 D. A DECISION INTER PARTES 76 VI.
CONCLUSION 76 CHAPTER 4 IS THERE ANY WEB FOR THE SPIDER? JURISDICTION
OVER CO-DEFENDANTS AFTER ROCHE NEDERLAND 79 CRISTINA GONZALEZ BEILFUSS
I. INTRODUCTION 79 II. THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 80 III. NATIONAL CASE-LAW
BEFORE ROCHE 81 IV. THE ROCHE DECISION 83 V. CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE
OUTCOME OF THE ROCHE CASE 84 VI. PERSPECTIVES AFTER ROCHE 87 CHAPTER 5
THE APPROPRIATE VENUE FOR CROSS-BORDER PATENT DISPUTES: HEADING (FAR)
WEST? 89 MARTA PERTEGDS I. INTRODUCTION 89 II. THE COMPARTMENTALIZED
APPROACH TO PATENT DISPUTES 90 A. INTRODUCTION 90 B. THE STATE OF THE
ART ON FOREIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS 90 1. SAME CASE OR
CONTROVERSY 93 2. EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IS WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF
THE DISTRICT COURT 94 A. LACK OF INTERNATIONAL REGIME 94 B. PATENTS ARE
LOCAL RIGHTS 95 C. JUDICIAL ECONOMY, CONVENIENCE AND FAIRNESS 97 C.
CROSS-BORDER PATENT ENFORCEMENT IN THE US: ANY FUTURE PERSPECTIVES? 99
III. COMPARATIVE APPROACH AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 99 A. LAW LAGS BEHIND
THE NEEDS OF THE INTERNATIONAL PATENT COMMUNITY 99 B. THE INITIATIVES
TOWARDS NEW ENFORCEMENT REGIMES 100 C. LEGISLATIVE PROGRESS ON THE
CURRENT JURISDICTIONAL SETTINGS 102 1. A CHANCE FOR EUROPE TO TACKLE
CURRENT DIFFICULTIES? 102 2. THE WAY FORWARD 103 X TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 6 SUING AT THE PLACE OF INFRINGEMENT: THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE
5(3) OF REGULATION 44/2001 TO IP MATTERS AND INTERNET DISPUTES 105
ARNAUD NUYTS I. INTRODUCTION 105 II. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUING AT THE PLACE
OF INFRINGEMENT 106 III. TYPES OF ACTIONS THAT CAN BE BROUGHT AT THE
PLACE OF INFRINGEMENT 110 IV. DETERMINATION OF THE PLACE OF INFRINGEMENT
114 A. THE PLACE OF THE CAUSAL EVENT OF INFRINGEMENT 117 B. THE PLACE
WHERE DAMAGE IS SUSTAINED 121 V. TERRITORIAL LIMITATION OF JURISDICTION
127 CHAPTER 7 CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION OVER THE
INTERNET 131 MAKSYMILIAN PAZDAN AND MACIEJ SZPUNAR I. INTRODUCTION 131
II. SPECIAL FEATURES OF UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS 133 III. THE LAW
APPLICABLE TO UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS 134 IV. JURISDICTION OVER UNFAIR
COMPETITION CLAIMS 137 A. DOMICILE OF THE DEFENDANT 138 B. PLACE WHERE
THE EVENT GIVING RISE TO THE DAMAGE TOOK PLACE 139 1. PLACE WHERE THE
DATA WAS UPLOADED 140 2. PLACE WHERE THE SERVER IS SITUATED 141 3.
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DEFENDANT 141 C. PLACE WHERE THE DAMAGE OCCURRED
(IS SUSTAINED) 142 1. WHAT KINDS OF CLAIMS ARE COVERED BY ARTICLE 5,
PARAGRAPH 3? 142 2. DOES THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE WEBSITE IN ONE COUNTRY
JUSTIFY THE POSSIBILITY OF ACCEPTING JURISDICTION BY THE COURTS OF THAT
COUNTRY? 143 3. POSSIBLE WAYS TO LIMIT JURISDICTION 146 4. PROPOSAL OF A
WIDE INTERPRETATION OF THE PLACE WHERE DAMAGE IS SUSTAINED IN CASE OF
TORTS COMMITTED OVER THE INTERNET 147 V. CONCLUSIONS 149 CHAPTER 8
JUSTICIABILITY, DISCRETION AND FOREIGN RIGHTS 151 RICHARD FENTIMAN I.
INTRODUCTION 151 II. A CASE STUDY: ENGLISH LAW 153 A. THREE ISSUES 153
1. ENTITLEMENT 154 2. INFRINGEMENT 154 3. EXPLOITATION 157 TABLE OF
CONTENTS XI B. CRITIQUE 157 1. ENTITLEMENT 157 2. INFRINGEMENT 160 3.
EXPLOITATION 161 C. THE FOREIGN LAW (NON-) PROBLEM 163 D. CONCLUSION 164
III. NATIONAL LAW AND COMMUNITY LAW 164 A. THE LEGACY OF OWUSU V.
JACKSON 164 B. PEARCE AND THE SCOPE OF COMMUNITY LAW 166 C. POSSIBLE
SOLUTIONS 169 D. FIVE MEASURES OF CONSISTENCY 171 E. CONSISTENCY
UNDERMINED? 173 F. TWO CASES 174 G. CONSISTENCY AND INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY 176 IV. CONCLUSION 177 CHAPTER 9 TORPEDOES AND ACTION FOR
NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL IP LAW LITIGATION 181 ANNA
GARDELLA I. INTRODUCTION 181 II. CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION OF IP RIGHTS
INFRINGEMENT WITHIN THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA 183 III. THE TORPEDO
ACTIONS 186 IV. TORPEDOES WITHIN THE EU JUDICIAL AREA: CONSISTENCY OR
INCONSISTENCY? 187 A. SUING AT THE DEFENDANT S DOMICILE 187 B. SUING AT
THE PLACE OF THE TORT 188 C. SUCCESSFUL TORPEDOES: ESTABLISHMENT OF US
PENDENS AND STAY OF PROCEEDINGS IN OTHER MEMBER STATES 189 V. FLAWS IN
THE TORPEDO: THE INFRINGEMENT AND VALIDITY INTERFACE. TERRITORIAL NATURE
OF IP REGISTERED RIGHTS AND OBSTACLES TO CROSS-BORDER INFRINGEMENT
LITIGATION 190 VI. THE ECJ S GAT V. LUK DECISION 190 VII. GAT V. LUK AND
ROCHE CASES: ADVERSE EFFECTS ON TORPEDO PRACTICE 193 VIII. NEGATIVE
ATTITUDE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN RESPECT OF TORPEDOES 195 IX.
(INCONSISTENCY OF NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS WITH ARTICLE 5(3)
CONVENTION/REGULATION? 197 A. THE REQUIREMENT OF AN INJURY HAVING
ALREADY OCCURRED 199 B. THE AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 5(3) BY REGULATION EC
N. 44/2001: INCLUSION OF THREATENED WRONGS 199 C. THE NOTION OF MATTER
RELATING TO TORT 200 D. FORUM ACTONS, PROXIMITY PRINCIPLE AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATIONS 201 E. PROPOSALS TO AVOID ABUSIVE LITIGATION IN
CROSS-BORDER NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS 203 XII TABLE OF CONTENTS X.
CONSISTENCY OF NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS WITH THE CONVENTION/REGULATION
FRAMEWORK: THE INTERFACE WITH ADMISSIBILITY PRECONDITIONS PROVIDED FOR
BY NATIONAL LAW 205 XI. CONCLUDING REMARKS 206 CHAPTER 10 JURISDICTION
TO GRANT PROVISIONAL AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
MATTERS 207 KATARZYNA SZYCHOWSKA I. INTRODUCTION 207 II. DEFINITION OF
PROVISIONAL AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES 208 III. INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION
TO ORDER PROVISIONAL INCLUDING PROTECTIVE MEASURES 213 A. INTERIM RELIEF
APPLICATION BEFORE A COURT HAVING JURISDICTION AS TO THE SUBSTANCE OF
THE CASE 214 1. DOMICILE OF THE DEFENDANT 215 2. DOMICILE OF ONE OF THE
DEFENDANTS 217 B. PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED UNDER ARTICLE 31 221 1.
CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 31 222 A. NOTION OF PROVISIONAL,
INCLUDING PROTECTIVE, MEASURES 222 B. TERRITORIAL SCOPE OF THE RELIEF
223 2. AUTONOMOUS CHARACTER OF ARTICLE 31 228 A. AN OLD DEBATE: IS
ARTICLE 31 AN AUTONOMOUS HEAD OF JURISDICTION? 228 B. A NEW ELEMENT: IS
ARTICLE 31 APPLICABLE REGARDLESS OF THE DOMICILE OF THE DEFENDANT? 230
IV. CONCLUSION 235 CHAPTER 11 INTERACTIONS BETWEEN COMMUNITY INSTRUMENTS
AND INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS (INCLUDING THE DRAFT NEW LUGANO
CONVENTION) IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MATTERS 237 ALEGRIA BORRDS I.
INTRODUCTION 237 II. THE DETERMINING FACTORS 238 A. IN GENERAL 238 B.
THE OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ON THE COMPETENCE OF THE
COMMUNITY TO CONCLUDE THE REVISED LUGANO CONVENTION 240 C. THE COMMUNITY
PATENT 245 III. THE RESULTS 247 A. IN GENERAL 247 B. THE REVISION OF THE
LUGANO CONVENTION 247 C. THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENTS OF 30 JUNE 2005 251 IV. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS 255 TABLE OF
CONTENTS XIII CHAPTER 12 THE IMPACT OF THE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE ON THE
BRUSSELS I REGIME 257 JOAQUIM J. FORNER DELAYGUA I. DIRECTIVE
2004/48/EC: GENERAL ASPECTS 257 A. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF DIRECTIVE
2004/48/EC 257 B. GENERAL ASPECTS: THE DIRECTIVE AND EC INSTRUMENTS OF
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 260 II. OBTAINING OF EVIDENCE V. PROVISIONAL
AND PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES 262 A. THE DIRECTIVE: SCOPE 262 1. OBTAINING
EVIDENCE 263 2. PRESERVING EVIDENCE AND PRESERVING THE RIGHT TO BE
ADJUDICATED ON THE MERITS 265 B. THE RESPECTIVE ROLES OF BIR AND ER 268
C. JURISDICTION TO ORDER PROVISIONAL, INCLUDING PROTECTIVE, MEASURES
UNDER ARTICLE 31 BIR 271 III. JURISDICTION ON THE MERITS 273 A. REMEDIES
PROVIDED FOR IN THE DIRECTIVE AND ROLES OF ARTICLES 2 AND 5.3 BIR 273 B.
REACH OF EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION UNDER BIR (ARTICLE 22.4 BIR) AND
ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 276 C. ENFORCEMENT OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE CO-DEFENDANTS RULE OF JURISDICTION
(ARTICLE 6.1 BIR) 280 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS 282
A. EX PARTE DIRECTIVE MEASURES 283 B. EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION, PUBLIC
POLICY AND IRRECONCILABLE JUDGMENTS EXCEPTIONS 285 1. EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION 285 2. PUBLIC POLICY AND IRRECONCILABLE JUDGMENTS 286 V.
CONCLUDING REMARKS 288 CHAPTER 13 PRESERVATION AND TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN
CROSS-BORDER PROCEEDINGS - COMPARATIVE REMARKS IN THE CONTEXT OF IP
LITIGATION 289 BURKHARD HESS I. INTRODUCTION 289 II. THE DIFFERENT
NATIONAL SYSTEMS 290 A. GATHERING OF INFORMATION AND PRESERVATION OF
EVIDENCE 290 B. PROVISIONAL MEASURES FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE
291 III. THE EC-FRAMEWORK 293 A. THE EVIDENCE REGULATION EC 1206/2001
293 B. THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION EC 44/2001 294 C. THE ENFORCEMENT
DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC 295 D. THE ECJ S DECISION IN ST PAUL S DAIRY - A
MISSED OPPORTUNITY 297 XIV TABLE OF CONTENTS E. THE TEDESCO CASE 298 F.
THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE UNDER ARTICLES 31 AND 32 OF THE JUDGMENTS
REGULATION 299 IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS 301 CHAPTER 14 CONCLUDING REMARKS:
TERRITORIALITY, INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE AND CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CLAIMS 303 NIKITAS HATZIMIHAIL I. INTRODUCTION 303
II. THE EVOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PARADIGM 304 III. EVOLVING
INTERNATIONAL REGIMES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION 305 IV.
TERRITORIALITY IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 306 V. CONCLUSION 308 INDEX 309
|
| adam_txt |
TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORS' NOTE XV TABLE OF CASES XVII CHAPTER 1
CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION IN IP/IT MATTERS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE
TRANSFORMATION OF THE JURISDICTIONAL LANDSCAPE 1 ARNAUD NUYTS, KATARZYNA
SZYCHOWSKA AND NIKITAS HATZIMIHAIL I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. FROM STRICT
TERRITORIALITY TO CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION 4 A. TERRITORIALITY OF RIGHTS
MATCHED WITH TERRITORIALITY OF PROCEDURE 4 B. THE CHANGE OF THINKING
BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 6 III. THE CROSS-BORDER
LITIGATION MACHINERY 9 A. HOW THE MACHINERY STARTED 9 1. CROSS-BORDER
INJUNCTIONS 9 2. JURISDICTION OVER JOINT DEFENDANTS 13 3. RECOGNITION
AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 16 B. HOW IT GOT BLOCKED AND WAS
THEN FIXED 17 1. ABUSE OF JOINDERS AND REMEDIES FROM DOMESTIC COURTS 18
2. PRE-EMPTIVE LITIGATION AND REMEDIES FROM DOMESTIC COURTS 20 C. AND
HOW IT GOT BLOCKED AGAIN 26 1. STUMBLING BLOCK: HOW TO SEVER THE
VALIDITY FROM THE INFRINGEMENT? 26 2. IS THERE ANY WEB FOR THE SPIDER?
30 D. HEADING FOR THE FUTURE: INSTEAD OF FIXING THE MACHINERY, SETTING
UP A NEW ONE? 33 IV. COPYRIGHT LITIGATION UNDER THE BRUSSELS REGIME 35
V. IMPACT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON THE LITIGATION OF IP RIGHTS UNDER
THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION/REGULATION 39 VI. CONCLUSION 46 VIII TABLE OF
CONTENTS CHAPTER 2 THE COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK FOR CROSS-BORDER INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LITIGATION 49 JEAN-SYLVESTRE BERGE
I. INTRODUCTION 49 II. YESTERDAY: INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PRIOR TO THE
DEVELOPMENT OF AN EU FRAMEWORK 50 A. INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS 50 B.
INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION STRICTLY SPEAKING 51 III. TODAY: CHANGES IN
INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION DUE TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EU FRAMEWORK 52
A. ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EU FRAMEWORK FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 52 B.
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
LAW 53 C. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMMUNITY FRAMEWORK FOR PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW 53 D. THE CHANGING FACE OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION 54
IV. TOMORROW: WHAT TYPE OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION AND WHAT TYPE OF
COMMUNITY LAW CAN BE EXPECTED? 55 APPENDIX 57 I. INTERNATIONAL
MULTILATERAL TEXTS SPECIFIC TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 57 II. COMMUNITY
TEXTS SPECIFIC TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 58 III. COMMUNITY TEXTS SPECIFIC
TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 59 IV. COMMUNITY TEXTS SPECIFIC TO
INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW CONTAINING PROVISIONS RELATING TO INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 59 CHAPTER 3 THE WIDENING REACH OF
EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION: WHERE CAN YOU LITIGATE IP RIGHTS AFTER GAT? 61
PAUL L. C. TORREMANS I. INTRODUCTION 61 II. THE JUDGMENT 62 A. A
SOMEWHAT UNUSUAL FACTUAL BASIS 62 B. THE CASE BEFORE THE GERMAN COURTS
62 C. THE COURT OF JUSTICE GOES BACK TO DUIJNSTEE 63 D. THE QUESTIONABLE
LINK WITH NATIONAL OFFICES AND NATIONAL LAW 65 E. ARTICLE 22 AND ITS
POSITION IN THE SCHEME OF THE REGULATION 66 F. FURTHER POINTS RAISED IN
SUPPORT OF ITS APPROACH BY THE COURT OF JUSTICE 69 III. THE POSITION
ADOPTED BY THE COURT 71 TABLE OF CONTENTS IX IV. THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE
JUDGMENT 72 A. PATENT CASES 72 B. POLICY 72 C. OTHER REGISTERED RIGHTS
73 V. TOWARDS A SOLUTION 74 A. OBJECTIVES 74 B. THE ROLE OF ARTICLES 2
AND 5 74 C. THE ROLE OF ARTICLE 22 75 D. A DECISION INTER PARTES 76 VI.
CONCLUSION 76 CHAPTER 4 IS THERE ANY WEB FOR THE SPIDER? JURISDICTION
OVER CO-DEFENDANTS AFTER ROCHE NEDERLAND 79 CRISTINA GONZALEZ BEILFUSS
I. INTRODUCTION 79 II. THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 80 III. NATIONAL CASE-LAW
BEFORE ROCHE 81 IV. THE ROCHE DECISION 83 V. CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE
OUTCOME OF THE ROCHE CASE 84 VI. PERSPECTIVES AFTER ROCHE 87 CHAPTER 5
THE APPROPRIATE VENUE FOR CROSS-BORDER PATENT DISPUTES: HEADING (FAR)
WEST? 89 MARTA PERTEGDS I. INTRODUCTION 89 II. THE COMPARTMENTALIZED
APPROACH TO PATENT DISPUTES 90 A. INTRODUCTION 90 B. THE 'STATE OF THE
ART' ON FOREIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS 90 1. SAME CASE OR
CONTROVERSY 93 2. EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IS 'WITHIN THE DISCRETION OF
THE DISTRICT COURT' 94 A. LACK OF INTERNATIONAL REGIME 94 B. PATENTS ARE
LOCAL RIGHTS 95 C. JUDICIAL ECONOMY, CONVENIENCE AND FAIRNESS 97 C.
CROSS-BORDER PATENT ENFORCEMENT IN THE US: ANY FUTURE PERSPECTIVES? 99
III. COMPARATIVE APPROACH AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS 99 A. LAW LAGS BEHIND
THE NEEDS OF THE INTERNATIONAL PATENT COMMUNITY 99 B. THE INITIATIVES
TOWARDS NEW ENFORCEMENT REGIMES 100 C. LEGISLATIVE PROGRESS ON THE
CURRENT JURISDICTIONAL SETTINGS 102 1. A CHANCE FOR EUROPE TO TACKLE
CURRENT DIFFICULTIES? 102 2. THE WAY FORWARD 103 X TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 6 SUING AT THE PLACE OF INFRINGEMENT: THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE
5(3) OF REGULATION 44/2001 TO IP MATTERS AND INTERNET DISPUTES 105
ARNAUD NUYTS I. INTRODUCTION 105 II. LEGAL BASIS FOR SUING AT THE PLACE
OF INFRINGEMENT 106 III. TYPES OF ACTIONS THAT CAN BE BROUGHT AT THE
PLACE OF INFRINGEMENT 110 IV. DETERMINATION OF THE PLACE OF INFRINGEMENT
114 A. THE PLACE OF THE CAUSAL EVENT OF INFRINGEMENT 117 B. THE PLACE
WHERE DAMAGE IS SUSTAINED 121 V. TERRITORIAL LIMITATION OF JURISDICTION
127 CHAPTER 7 CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION OVER THE
INTERNET 131 MAKSYMILIAN PAZDAN AND MACIEJ SZPUNAR I. INTRODUCTION 131
II. SPECIAL FEATURES OF UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS 133 III. THE LAW
APPLICABLE TO UNFAIR COMPETITION CLAIMS 134 IV. JURISDICTION OVER UNFAIR
COMPETITION CLAIMS 137 A. DOMICILE OF THE DEFENDANT 138 B. PLACE WHERE
THE EVENT GIVING RISE TO THE DAMAGE TOOK PLACE 139 1. PLACE WHERE THE
DATA WAS UPLOADED 140 2. PLACE WHERE THE SERVER IS SITUATED 141 3.
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DEFENDANT 141 C. PLACE WHERE THE DAMAGE OCCURRED
(IS SUSTAINED) 142 1. WHAT KINDS OF CLAIMS ARE COVERED BY ARTICLE 5,
PARAGRAPH 3? 142 2. DOES THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE WEBSITE IN ONE COUNTRY
JUSTIFY THE POSSIBILITY OF ACCEPTING JURISDICTION BY THE COURTS OF THAT
COUNTRY? 143 3. POSSIBLE WAYS TO LIMIT JURISDICTION 146 4. PROPOSAL OF A
WIDE INTERPRETATION OF THE 'PLACE WHERE DAMAGE IS SUSTAINED' IN CASE OF
TORTS COMMITTED OVER THE INTERNET 147 V. CONCLUSIONS 149 CHAPTER 8
JUSTICIABILITY, DISCRETION AND FOREIGN RIGHTS 151 RICHARD FENTIMAN I.
INTRODUCTION 151 II. A CASE STUDY: ENGLISH LAW 153 A. THREE ISSUES 153
1. ENTITLEMENT 154 2. INFRINGEMENT 154 3. EXPLOITATION 157 TABLE OF
CONTENTS XI B. CRITIQUE 157 1. ENTITLEMENT 157 2. INFRINGEMENT 160 3.
EXPLOITATION 161 C. THE FOREIGN LAW (NON-) PROBLEM 163 D. CONCLUSION 164
III. NATIONAL LAW AND COMMUNITY LAW 164 A. THE LEGACY OF OWUSU V.
JACKSON 164 B. PEARCE AND THE SCOPE OF COMMUNITY LAW 166 C. POSSIBLE
SOLUTIONS 169 D. FIVE MEASURES OF CONSISTENCY 171 E. CONSISTENCY
UNDERMINED? 173 F. TWO CASES 174 G. CONSISTENCY AND INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY 176 IV. CONCLUSION 177 CHAPTER 9 TORPEDOES AND ACTION FOR
NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL IP LAW LITIGATION 181 ANNA
GARDELLA I. INTRODUCTION 181 II. CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION OF IP RIGHTS
INFRINGEMENT WITHIN THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA 183 III. THE TORPEDO
ACTIONS 186 IV. TORPEDOES WITHIN THE EU JUDICIAL AREA: CONSISTENCY OR
INCONSISTENCY? 187 A. SUING AT THE DEFENDANT'S DOMICILE 187 B. SUING AT
THE PLACE OF THE TORT 188 C. SUCCESSFUL TORPEDOES: ESTABLISHMENT OF US
PENDENS AND STAY OF PROCEEDINGS IN OTHER MEMBER STATES 189 V. FLAWS IN
THE TORPEDO: THE INFRINGEMENT AND VALIDITY INTERFACE. TERRITORIAL NATURE
OF IP REGISTERED RIGHTS AND OBSTACLES TO CROSS-BORDER INFRINGEMENT
LITIGATION 190 VI. THE ECJ'S GAT V. LUK DECISION 190 VII. GAT V. LUK AND
ROCHE CASES: ADVERSE EFFECTS ON TORPEDO PRACTICE 193 VIII. NEGATIVE
ATTITUDE OF DOMESTIC COURTS IN RESPECT OF TORPEDOES 195 IX.
(INCONSISTENCY OF NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS WITH ARTICLE 5(3)
CONVENTION/REGULATION? 197 A. THE REQUIREMENT OF AN INJURY HAVING
ALREADY OCCURRED 199 B. THE AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE 5(3) BY REGULATION EC
N. 44/2001: INCLUSION OF THREATENED WRONGS 199 C. THE NOTION OF MATTER
RELATING TO TORT 200 D. FORUM ACTONS, PROXIMITY PRINCIPLE AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATIONS 201 E. PROPOSALS TO AVOID ABUSIVE LITIGATION IN
CROSS-BORDER NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS 203 XII TABLE OF CONTENTS X.
CONSISTENCY OF NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS WITH THE CONVENTION/REGULATION
FRAMEWORK: THE INTERFACE WITH ADMISSIBILITY PRECONDITIONS PROVIDED FOR
BY NATIONAL LAW 205 XI. CONCLUDING REMARKS 206 CHAPTER 10 JURISDICTION
TO GRANT PROVISIONAL AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
MATTERS 207 KATARZYNA SZYCHOWSKA I. INTRODUCTION 207 II. DEFINITION OF
PROVISIONAL AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES 208 III. INTERNATIONAL JURISDICTION
TO ORDER PROVISIONAL INCLUDING PROTECTIVE MEASURES 213 A. INTERIM RELIEF
APPLICATION BEFORE A COURT HAVING JURISDICTION AS TO THE SUBSTANCE OF
THE CASE 214 1. DOMICILE OF THE DEFENDANT 215 2. DOMICILE OF ONE OF THE
DEFENDANTS 217 B. PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED UNDER ARTICLE 31 221 1.
CONDITIONS OF APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 31 222 A. NOTION OF PROVISIONAL,
INCLUDING PROTECTIVE, MEASURES 222 B. TERRITORIAL SCOPE OF THE RELIEF
223 2. AUTONOMOUS CHARACTER OF ARTICLE 31 228 A. AN OLD DEBATE: IS
ARTICLE 31 AN AUTONOMOUS HEAD OF JURISDICTION? 228 B. A NEW ELEMENT: IS
ARTICLE 31 APPLICABLE REGARDLESS OF THE DOMICILE OF THE DEFENDANT? 230
IV. CONCLUSION 235 CHAPTER 11 INTERACTIONS BETWEEN COMMUNITY INSTRUMENTS
AND INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS (INCLUDING THE DRAFT NEW LUGANO
CONVENTION) IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MATTERS 237 ALEGRIA BORRDS I.
INTRODUCTION 237 II. THE DETERMINING FACTORS 238 A. IN GENERAL 238 B.
THE OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE ON THE COMPETENCE OF THE
COMMUNITY TO CONCLUDE THE REVISED LUGANO CONVENTION 240 C. THE COMMUNITY
PATENT 245 III. THE RESULTS 247 A. IN GENERAL 247 B. THE REVISION OF THE
LUGANO CONVENTION 247 C. THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT
AGREEMENTS OF 30 JUNE 2005 251 IV. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS 255 TABLE OF
CONTENTS XIII CHAPTER 12 THE IMPACT OF THE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE ON THE
BRUSSELS I REGIME 257 JOAQUIM J. FORNER DELAYGUA I. DIRECTIVE
2004/48/EC: GENERAL ASPECTS 257 A. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF DIRECTIVE
2004/48/EC 257 B. GENERAL ASPECTS: THE DIRECTIVE AND EC INSTRUMENTS OF
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 260 II. OBTAINING OF EVIDENCE V. PROVISIONAL
AND PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES 262 A. THE DIRECTIVE: SCOPE 262 1. OBTAINING
EVIDENCE 263 2. PRESERVING EVIDENCE AND PRESERVING THE RIGHT TO BE
ADJUDICATED ON THE MERITS 265 B. THE RESPECTIVE ROLES OF BIR AND ER 268
C. JURISDICTION TO ORDER 'PROVISIONAL, INCLUDING PROTECTIVE, MEASURES'
UNDER ARTICLE 31 BIR 271 III. JURISDICTION ON THE MERITS 273 A. REMEDIES
PROVIDED FOR IN THE DIRECTIVE AND ROLES OF ARTICLES 2 AND 5.3 BIR 273 B.
REACH OF EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION UNDER BIR (ARTICLE 22.4 BIR) AND
ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 276 C. ENFORCEMENT OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE CO-DEFENDANTS RULE OF JURISDICTION
(ARTICLE 6.1 BIR) 280 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS 282
A. EX PARTE DIRECTIVE MEASURES 283 B. EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION, PUBLIC
POLICY AND IRRECONCILABLE JUDGMENTS EXCEPTIONS 285 1. EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION 285 2. PUBLIC POLICY AND IRRECONCILABLE JUDGMENTS 286 V.
CONCLUDING REMARKS 288 CHAPTER 13 PRESERVATION AND TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN
CROSS-BORDER PROCEEDINGS - COMPARATIVE REMARKS IN THE CONTEXT OF IP
LITIGATION 289 BURKHARD HESS I. INTRODUCTION 289 II. THE DIFFERENT
NATIONAL SYSTEMS 290 A. GATHERING OF INFORMATION AND PRESERVATION OF
EVIDENCE 290 B. PROVISIONAL MEASURES FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE
291 III. THE EC-FRAMEWORK 293 A. THE EVIDENCE REGULATION EC 1206/2001
293 B. THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION EC 44/2001 294 C. THE ENFORCEMENT
DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC 295 D. THE ECJ'S DECISION IN ST PAUL'S DAIRY - A
MISSED OPPORTUNITY 297 XIV TABLE OF CONTENTS E. THE TEDESCO CASE 298 F.
THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE UNDER ARTICLES 31 AND 32 OF THE JUDGMENTS
REGULATION 299 IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS 301 CHAPTER 14 CONCLUDING REMARKS:
TERRITORIALITY, INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE AND CROSS-BORDER LITIGATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CLAIMS 303 NIKITAS HATZIMIHAIL I. INTRODUCTION 303
II. THE EVOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PARADIGM 304 III. EVOLVING
INTERNATIONAL REGIMES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION 305 IV.
TERRITORIALITY IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 306 V. CONCLUSION 308 INDEX 309 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023126138 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJE983 |
| callnumber-raw | KJE983.I583 |
| callnumber-search | KJE983.I583 |
| callnumber-sort | KJE 3983 I583 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)230917128 (DE-599)BVBBV023126138 |
| dewey-full | 340.9 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340.9 |
| dewey-search | 340.9 |
| dewey-sort | 3340.9 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01438nam a2200337 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023126138</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080826 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080212s2008 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041127020</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-411-2702-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)230917128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023126138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE983.I583</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340.9</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International litigation in intellectual property and information technology</subfield><subfield code="b">European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology</subfield><subfield code="c">ed., Arnaud. Nuyts ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Austin [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer Law & Business</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIII, 311 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kluwer law international</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Intellectual property</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intellectual property</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nuyts, Arnaud</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016328546&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016328546</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| geographic_facet | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| id | DE-604.BV023126138 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T19:53:30Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:11:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789041127020 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016328546 |
| oclc_num | 230917128 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-12 |
| physical | XXIII, 311 S. |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Law & Business |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Kluwer law international |
| spelling | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology ed., Arnaud. Nuyts ... Austin [u.a.] Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2008 XXIII, 311 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Kluwer law international Conflict of laws Intellectual property European Union countries Intellectual property European Union countries Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Nuyts, Arnaud Sonstige oth SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016328546&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology Conflict of laws Intellectual property European Union countries Intellectual property European Union countries |
| title | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology |
| title_auth | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology |
| title_exact_search | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology |
| title_exact_search_txtP | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology |
| title_full | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology ed., Arnaud. Nuyts ... |
| title_fullStr | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology ed., Arnaud. Nuyts ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology ed., Arnaud. Nuyts ... |
| title_short | International litigation in intellectual property and information technology |
| title_sort | international litigation in intellectual property and information technology european commisson research project on judicial cooperation in matters of intellectual property and information technology |
| title_sub | European Commisson Research Project on Judicial Cooperation in Matters of Intellectual Property and Information Technology |
| topic | Conflict of laws Intellectual property European Union countries Intellectual property European Union countries |
| topic_facet | Conflict of laws Intellectual property European Union countries Intellectual property European Union countries Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016328546&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nuytsarnaud internationallitigationinintellectualpropertyandinformationtechnologyeuropeancommissonresearchprojectonjudicialcooperationinmattersofintellectualpropertyandinformationtechnology |