Article 234 and competition law: an analysis
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen aan den Rijn
Kluwer Law International
2008
|
| Schriftenreihe: | International competition law series
33 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | LXVI, 610 S. graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9789041126054 9041126058 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023092673 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20100202 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 080122s2008 xx d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789041126054 |9 978-90-411-2605-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 9041126058 |9 90-411-2605-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)216928909 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023092673 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-12 |a DE-29 |a DE-19 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJE6456 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 343.240721 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PS 3760 |0 (DE-625)139788: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rodger, Barry J. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Article 234 and competition law |b an analysis |c ed. by by Barry J. Rodger |
| 264 | 1 | |a Alphen aan den Rijn |b Kluwer Law International |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a LXVI, 610 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a International competition law series |v 33 | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Advisory opinions |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Restraint of trade |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Restraint of trade |z Europe |v Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Restraint of trade |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Restraint of trade |z European Union countries |v Cases | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht |0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht |0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a International competition law series |v 33 |w (DE-604)BV014209489 |9 33 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016295517&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016295517 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820135848820080640 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF CASES XXXIX
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF CASES XLVII CONTRIBUTOR BIOGRAPHIES LV
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LXIII FOREWORD LXV MIGUEL POIARES MADURO, ADVOCATE
GENERAL, ECJ PARTI INTRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS BARRY RODGER CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION - BACKGROUND AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3 1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. ARTICLE 234 AND ITS CRUCIAL ROLE 4 3. BACKGROUND LITERATURE AND
RESEARCH 7 4. UNDERTAKING THE RESEARCH 10 4.1 RESEARCH AIMS AND PROPOSED
OUTCOMES 10 4.2 METHODOLOGY 12 4.2.1 COMPILING THE DATABASE OF CASES 12
VIII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.2.2 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE OF THE RESEARCH:
COMPETITION LAW-RELATED RULINGS 14 4.2.3 ROLE OF THE RAPPORTEURS 15
4.2.4 DIFFICULTIES/LIMITATIONS 16 5. BOOK LAYOUT 18 CHAPTER 2 NUMBER AND
SOURCE OF ECJ RULINGS 21 21 22 28 29 31 31 35 36 37 38 41 43 43 47 47 48
50 51 55 57 59 60 64 65 65 66 66 CHAPTER 3 ECJ RULINGS AND THE
POST-RULING PROCESS 67 1. INTRODUCTION 67 2. COMPETITION LAW ISSUES 68
2.1 FRANCE 72 2.2 ITALY 73 2.3 GERMANY 74 1. 2. 3. 4. INTRODUCTION
NUMBER OF RULINGS AND PERIODIC RULINGS 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8
2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 KEY] FRANCE ITALY GERMANY BELGIUM THE
NETHERLANDS DENMARK PORTUGAL UNITED KINGDOM AUSTRIA FINLAND GREECE
IRELAND LUXEMBOURG SPAIN PERIOD RULINGS SOURCE OF REFERENCES 4.1 4.2 4.3
4.4 4.5 4.6 FRANCE ITALY GERMANY BELGIUM THE NETHERLANDS COUNTRIES WITH
3-5 RULINGS 4.6.1 DENMARK 4.6.2 PORTUGAL 4.6.3 UK DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS IX 2.4 BELGIUM 75 2.5 THE NETHERLANDS 76 2.6 COUNTRIES WITH 3-5
RULINGS 77 2.6.1 DENMARK 77 2.6.2 PORTUGAL 78 2.6.3 UK 78 2.7 COUNTRIES
WITH 1-2 RULINGS 79 2.7.1 AUSTRIA 79 2.7.2 FINLAND 79 2.7.3 GREECE 79
2.7.4 IRELAND 79 2.7.5 LUXEMBOURG 79 2.7.6 SPAIN 80 3. LENGTH OF ECJ
COMPETITION RULINGS 80 4. ECJ COMPETITION RULING DELAYS 81 5.
POST-RULING PROCESS 83 5.1 FRANCE 87 5.2 ITALY 89 5.3 GERMANY 93 5.4
BELGIUM 98 5.5 THE NETHERLANDS 100 5.6 COUNTRIES WITH 3-5 RULINGS 102
5.6.1 DENMARK 102 5.6.2 PORTUGAL 104 5.6.3 UK 105 5.7 COUNTRIES WITH 1-2
RULINGS 105 5.7.1 AUSTRIA 105 5.7.2 FINLAND 106 5.7.3 GREECE 106 5.7.4
IRELAND 106 5.7.5 LUXEMBOURG 106 5.7.6 SPAIN 106 6. EVIDENCE OF IMPACT
OF ECJ COMPETITION LAW RULINGS 107 6.1 LANDMARK ECJ COMPETITION LAW
RULINGS 107 6.1.1 FRANCE 108 6.1.2 ITALY 110 6.1.3 GERMANY 118 6.1.4
BELGIUM 124 6.1.5 NETHERLANDS 127 6.1.6 COUNTRIES WITH 3-5 RULINGS 134
6.1.7 COUNTRIES WITH 1-2 RULINGS 138 6.2 ECJ RULINGS AND THE CREATION OF
A LEGAL COMPETITION CULTURE IN THE COMMUNITY 141 7. CONCLUSIONS 145 X
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS PART II MEMBER STATE REPORTS 147 NATIONAL
RAPPORTEURS CHAPTER 4 FRANCE 149 GUILLAUME TAILLANDIER 1. INTRODUCTION
149 1.1 ANALYSIS OF FRENCH COURTS'REFERENCES 150 1.2 SUBJECT MATTER OF
THE DECISIONS REFERRED 151 1.3 RULING AND POST-RULING PROCESS 152 2.
FRENCH CASES 153 2.1 CASE 1: SOCIETE TECHNIQUE MINIERE (LTM) V.
MASCHINENBAU ULM GMBH (MBU) CASE 56/65 155 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 155 2.1.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 155 2.1.3 ECJ RULING 155 2.1.4 POST-RULING 156 2.2
CASE 2: SOCIETE ANONYME CADILLON V. FIRMA HOSS, MASCHINENBAU KG CASE
1/71 157 2.2.1 BACKGROUND 157 2.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 157 2.2.3 ECJ
RULING 157 2.2.4 POST-RULING 158 2.3 CASE 3: BEGUELIN IMPORT CO. V.
S.A.G.L. IMPORT EXPORT CASE 22/71 158 2.3.1 BACKGROUND 158 2.3.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 158 2.3.3 ECJ RULING 158 2.3.4 POST-RULING 159 2.4
CASE 4: FONDERIES ROUBAIX WATTRELOS V. FONDERIES ROUX AND FONDERIES JOT
CASE 63/75 159 2.4.1 BACKGROUND 159 2.4.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 160 2.4.3
ECJ RULING 160 2.4.4 POST-RULING 160 2.5 CASE 5: PROCUREUR GENERAL V.
HANS BUYS, HAN PESCH ET YVES DULLIEUX ET DENKAVIT FRANCE SARL CASE 5/79
161 2.5.1 BACKGROUND 161 2.5.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 161 2.5.3 ECJ RULING
161 2.5.4 POST-RULING 161 2.6 CASE 6: GREENWICH FILM V. SACEM CASE 22/79
161 2.6.1 BACKGROUND 161 2.6.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 162 DETAILED TABLE
OF CONTENTS XI 2.6.3 ECJ RULING 162 2.6.4 POST-RULING 162 2.7 CASE 7:
ANNE MARTY SA V. ESTEE LAUDER SA CASE 37/79 162 2.7.1 BACKGROUND 162
2.7.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 163 2.7.3 ECJ RULING 163 2.7.4 POST-RULING
164 2.8 CASE 8: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE AND OTHERS V. BRUNO GIRY AND
GUERLAIN SA AND OTHERS JOINED CASES 253/78 AND 1-3/79 164 2.8.1
BACKGROUND 164 2.8.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 164 2.8.3 ECJ RULING 164 2.8.4
POST-RULING 165 2.9 CASE 9: ASSOCIATION DES CENTRES DISTRIBUTEES EDOUARD
LECLERC AND OTHERS V. SARL 'AU BLE VERT' AND OTHERS CASE 229/83 165
2.9.1 BACKGROUND 165 2.9.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 165 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 165
2.9.4 POST-RULING 166 2.10 CASE 10: HENRI CULLET AND CHAMBRE SYNDICATE
DES REPARATEURS AUTOMOBILES ET DETAILLANTS DE PRODUITS PETROLIERS V.
CENTRE LECLERC A TOULOUSE AND CENTRE LECLERC A SAINT-ORENS-DE-GAMEVILLE
CASE 231/83 166 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 166 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 166
2.10.3 ECJ RULING 167 2.10.4 POST-RULING 167 2.11 CASE 11: BUREAU
NATIONAL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU COGNAC V. GUY CLAIR CASE 123/83 167
2.11.1 BACKGROUND 167 2.11.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 168 2.11.3 ECJ RULING
168 2.11.4 POST-RULING 168 2.12 CASE 12: SA SAINT-HERBLAIN DISTRIBUTION,
CENTRE DISTRIBUTEUR LECLERC AND OTHERS V. SYNDICAT DES LIBRAIRES DE
LOIRE - OCEAN CASE 299/83 169 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 169 2.12.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 169 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 169 2.12.4 POST-RULING 169 2.13 CASE 13:
PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE V. CLAUDE CHABAUD ET JEAN-LOUIS REMY CASE
79-80/84 170 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 170 XII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.13.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 170 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 170 2.13.4 POST-RULING 170
2.14 CASE 14: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE AND DIRECTION
INTERDEPARTEMENTALE DE LA CONCURRENCE ET DE LA CONSOMMATION V. JACQUES
BINET AND OTHERS CASE 149/84 171 2.14.1 BACKGROUND 171 2.14.2 QUESTION
FOR THE ECJ 171 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 171 2.14.4 POST-RULING 171 2.15 CASE
15: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE V. MARIE-HELENE FEREY, NEE HERICOTTE CASE
215/84 172 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 172 2.15.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 172 2.15.3
ECJ RULING 172 2.15.4 POST-RULING 173 2.16 CASE 16: PROCUREUR DE LA
REPUBLIQUE V. JEAN-PIERRE GONTIER CASE 201/84 173 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 173
2.16.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 173 2.16.3 ECJ RULING 173 2.16.4 POST-RULING
174 2.17 CASE 17: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE V. CHRISTIAN GRATIOT CASE
11/84 174 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 174 2.17.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 174 2.17.3
ECJ RULING 175 2.17.4 POST-RULING 175 2.18 CASE 18: PROCUREUR DE LA
REPUBLIQUE V. MICHEL LECLERC CASE 34/84 175 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 175 2.18.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 175 2.18.3 ECJ RULING 176 2.18.4 POST-RULING 176
2.19 CASE 19: SA ETABLISSEMENTS PISZKO V. SA DAMMARIE DISTRIBUTION
'CENTRE LECLERC' ET SA CARREFOUR SUPERMARCHE JOINED CASES 114 AND 115/84
177 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 177 2.19.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 177 2.19.3 ECJ
RULING 177 2.19.4 POST-RULING 178 2.20 CASE 20: PROCUREUR DE LA
REPUBLIQUE ET DIRECTEUR DEPARTEMENTAL DE LA CONCURRENCE ET DE LA
CONSOMMATION V. J. CHIRON AND OTHERS JOINED CASES 271-274/84 AND 6-7/85,
6/7/85 178 2.20.1 BACKGROUND 178 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XIII 2.20.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 178 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 179 2.20.4 POST-RULING 179
2.21 CASE 21: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS V. LUCAS ASJES AND OTHERS, ANDREW
GRAY AND OTHERS, JACQUES MAILLOT AND OTHERS, LEO LUDWIG AND OTHERS
JOINED CASES 209-213/84 179 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 179 2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 179 2.21.3 ECJ RULING 180 2.21.4 POST-RULING 180 2.22 CASE 22:
VAG FRANCE SA V. ETABLISSEMENTS MAGNE SA CASE 10/86 180 2.22.1
BACKGROUND 180 2.22.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 181 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 181
2.22.4 POST-RULING 181 2.23 CASE 23: G. BASSET V. SOCIETE DES AUTEURS,
COMPOSITEURS ET EDITEURS DE MUSIQUE (SACEM) CASE 402/85 182 2.23.1
BACKGROUND 182 2.23.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 182 2.23.3 ECJ RULING 182
2.23.4 POST-RULING 183 2.24 CASE 24: MINISTERE PUBLIC V. REGIS LEFEVRE
CASE 188/86 183 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 183 2.24.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 183
2.24.3 ECJ RULING 183 2.24.4 POST-RULING 184 2.25 CASE 25: BUREAU
NATIONAL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU COGNAC V. YVES AUBERT CASE 136/86 184
2.25.1 BACKGROUND 184 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 184 2.25.3 ECJ RULING
185 2.25.4 POST-RULING 185 2.26 CASE 26: CORINNE BODSON V. SA POMPES
FUNEBRES DES REGIONS LIBEREES CASE 30/87 185 2.26.1 BACKGROUND 185
2.26.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 186 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 186 2.26.4 POST-RULING
187 2.27 CASE 27: SYNDICAT DES LIBRAIRIES DE NORMANDIE V. L'AIGLE
DISTRIBUTION CASE 254/87 187 2.27.1 BACKGROUND 187 2.27.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 188 2.27.3 ECJ RULING 188 2.27.4 POST-RULING 188 XIV DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.28 CASE 28: SOCIETE ALSACIENNE ET LORRAINE DE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET D'ELECTRONIQUE (ALSATEL) V. SA NOVASAM CASE 247/86
188 2.28.1 BACKGROUND 188 2.28.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 189 2.28.3 ECJ
RULING 189 2.28.4 POST-RULING 189 2.29 CASE 29: LUCAZEAU E.A. V. SACEM
E.A. JOINED CASES C-L 10/88, 241/88 AND 242/88 190 2.29.1 BACKGROUND 190
2.29.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 190 2.29.3 ECJ RULING 190 2.29.4
POST-RULING 191 2.30 CASE 30: MINISTERE PUBLIC V. JEAN-LOUIS TOURNIER
CASE C-395/87 191 2.30.1 BACKGROUND 191 2.30.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 191
2.30.3 ECJ RULING 192 2.30.4 POST-RULING 193 2.31 CASE 31: CHRISTIAN
POUCET ASSURANCES GENERALES DE FRANCE ('AGF') V. CAISSE MUTUELLE
REGIONALE DU LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON ('CAMULRAC') AND DANIEL PISTRE V.
CAISSE AUTONOME NATIONALE DE COMPENSATION DE I' ASSURANCE VIEILLESSE DES
ARTISANS ('CANCAVA') JOINED CASES C-159/91 AND C-160/91 193 2.31.1
BACKGROUND 193 2.31.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 193 2.31.3 ECJ RULING 194
2.31.4 POST-RULING 194 2.32 CASE 32: SOCIETE CIVILE AGRICOLE DU CENTRE
D'INSEMINATION DE LA CRESPELLE V. COOPERATIVE D'ELEVAGE ET
D'INSEMINATION ARTIFWIELLE DU DEPARTEMENT DE LA MAYENNE CASE C-323/93
194 2.32.1 BACKGROUND 194 2.32.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 194 2.32.3 ECJ
RULING 195 2.32.4 POST-RULING 195 2.33 CASE 33: SOCIETE D'IMPORTATION
EDOUARD LECLERC-SIPLEC V. TF1 PUBLICITE SA AND M6 PUBLICITE SA CASE
C-412/93 195 2.33.1 BACKGROUND 195 2.33.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 196
2.33.3 ECJ RULING 196 2.33.4 POST-RULING 196 2.34 CASE 34: FFSA V.
MINISTERE DE I'AGRICULTURE ET DE LA PECHE CASE C-244/94 196 2.34.1
BACKGROUND 196 2.34.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 197 DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS XV 2.34.3 ECJ RULING 197 2.34.4 POST-RULING 197 2.35 CASE 35:
GRAND GARAGE ALBIGEOIS ET AUTRES V. GARAGE MASSOL SARL CASE C-226/94 197
2.35.1 BACKGROUND 197 2.35.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 198 2.35.3 ECJ RULING
198 2.35.4 POST-RULING 198 2.36 CASE 36: NISSAN FRANCE VS GARAGE SPORT
AUTO, STAR' TERRE SARL AND AQUEDUCS AUTOMOBILES SARL CAS E C-309/94 198
2.36.1 BACKGROUND 198 2.36.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 199 2.36.3 ECJ RULING
199 2.36.4 POST-RULING 199 2.37 CASE 37: SYNDICAT FRANGAIS DE I'EXPRESS
INTERNATIONAL (SFEI) AND OTHERS V. LA POSTE AND OTHERS CASE C-39/94 199
2.37.1 BACKGROUND 199 2.37.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 200 2.37.3 ECJ RULING
201 2.37.4 POST-RULING 201 2.38 CASE 38: FONTAINE V. AQUEDIUCS
AUTOMOBILE SARL CASE C-128/95 202 2.38.1 BACKGROUND 202 2.38.2 QUESTION
FOR THE ECJ 202 2.38.3 ECJ RULING 202 2.38.4 POST-RULING 203 2.39 CASE
39: JAVICO INTERNATIONAL - JAVICO AG V. YVES SAINT LAURENT PARFUMS SA
(YSLP) CASE C-306/96 203 2.39.1 BACKGROUND 203 2.39.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ
203 2.39.3 ECJ RULING 203 2.39.4 POST-RULING 204 2.40 CASE 40: CABOUR SA
ET NORD DISTRIBUTION AUTOMOBILE SA, SUPPORTED BY AUTOMOBILES PEUGEOT SA
ET AUTOMOBILES CITROEN SA V. ARNOR 'SOCO' SARL CASE C-230/96 204 2.40.1
BACKGROUND 204 2.40.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 205 2.40.3 ECJ RULING 205 2.40.4
POST-RULING 206 2.41 CASE 41: ECHIROLLES DISTRIBUTION SA V. ASSOCIATION
DU DAUPHINE E.A. CASE C-9/99 206 2.41.1 BACKGROUND 206 2.41.2 QUESTIONS
FOR ECJ 207 2.41.3 ECJ RULING 207 2.41.4 POST-RULING 207 XVI DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.42 CASE 42: FERRING SA V. AGENCE CENTRALE DES
ORGANISMES DE SECURITE SOCIALE (ACOSS) CASE C-53/00 207 2.42.1
BACKGROUND 207 2.42.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 208 2.42.3 ECJ RULING 208 2.42.4
POST-RULING 208 2.43 CASE 43: ROQUETTE FRERES SA V. DIRECTEUR GENERAL DE
LA CONCURRENCE, DE LA CONSOMMATION ET DE LA REPRESSION DESFRAUDES CASE
C-94/00 209 2.43.1 BACKGROUND 209 2.43.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 209 2.43.3
ECJ RULING 210 2.43.4 POST-RULING 211 2.44 CASE 44: MINISTRE DE
I'ECONOMIE, DES FINANCES ET DE VLNDUSTRIE VS GEMO SA CASE C-126/01 211
2.44.1 BACKGROUND 211 2.44.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 212 2.44.3 ECJ RULING 212
2.44.4 POST-RULING 212 CHAPTER ITALY 5 IGOR TACCANI 1. INTRODUCTION 2.
ITALIAN CASES 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 CASE 1: 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 CASE 2:
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 CASE 3: COSTA V. ENEL CASE 6/64 BACKGROUND
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING SIRENA V. EDA A.O. CASE
40/70 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING CARMINE
CAPOLONGO V. AZIENDE AGRICOLE MAYA CASE 77/72 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4
CASE 4: 2.4.1 2.4.2 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING GIUSEPPE SACCHI CASE 155/73 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ
213 213 216 218 218 218 218 219 220 220 220 220 222 223 223 223 223 224
224 224 224 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XVII 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10
2.11 2.12 2.4.3 ECJ RULING 2.4.4 POST-RULING CASE 5: IGAV V. ENCC CASE
94/74 2.5.1 BACKGROUND 2.5.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.5.3 ECJ RULING 2.5.4
POST-RULING CASE 6: IANNELLI & VOLPI V. MERONI CASE 74/76 2.6.1
BACKGROUND 2.6.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.6.3 ECJ RULING 2.6.4 POST-RULING
CASE 7: VAN AYMEDE V. UCI CASE 90/76 2.7.1 BACKGROUND 2.7.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 2.7.3 ECJ RULING 2.7.4 POST-RULING CASE 8: AMMINISTRAZIONE
DELLE FINANZE DELLO STATO V. DENKAVIT CASE 61/79 2.8.1 BACKGROUND 2.8.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.8.3 ECJ RULING 2.8.4 POST-RULING CASE 9:
AMMINISTRAZIONE DELLE FINANZE DELLO STATO V. ARIETE SPA CASE 811/79
2.9.1 BACKGROUND 2.9.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 2.9.4
POST-RULING CASE 10: AMMINISTRAZIONE DELLE FINANZE DELLO STATO V. M1REC0
CASE 826/79 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.10.3 ECJ
RULING 2.10.4 POST-RULING CASE 11: AMMINISTRAZIONE DELLE FINANZE DELLO
STATO V. ESSEVI SPA JOINED CASES 142 AND 143/80 2.11.1 BACKGROUND 2.11.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.11.3 ECJ RULING 2.11.4 POST-RULING CASE 12:
SALONIA V. POIDOMANI AND GIGLIO CASE 126/80 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 2.12.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 225 226 227 227 227 227 228 228 228 228 229 229
229 229 230 231 232 232 232 232 233 233 233 233 234 234 235 235 235 235
236 236 236 236 237 237 237 237 237 238 XVIII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 2.12.4 POST-RULING
CASE 13: CICRA AND MAXICAR V. REGIE NAZIONALE DES USINES RENAULT CASE
53/87 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 2.13.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.13.3 ECJ RULING
2.13.4 POST-RULING CASE 14: DM PONT V. USL N.2 DI CARRARA CASE C-21/88
2.14.1 BACKGROUND 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 2.14.4
POST-RULING CASE 15: MERCI CONVENZIONAL PORTO DI GENOVA SPA V.
SIDERURGICA GABRIELLI CASE C-179/90 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 2.15.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 2.15.4 POST-RULING 2.15.4.1 COMMENT CASE
16: FONDERIA A. SPA V. CASSA CONGUAGLIO PER IL SETTORE ELECTRICO CASE
C-100/92 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 2.16.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.16.3 ECJ RULING
2.16.4 POST-RULING CASE 17: CORSICA FERRIES ITALIA SRI V. CORPO PILOTI
DEL PORTO DI GENOVA CASE C-18/93 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 2.17.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 2.17.3 ECJ RULING 2.17.4 POST-RULING CASE 18: CENTRO SERVIZI
SPEDIPORTO CASE C-96/94 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 2.18.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ
2.18.3 ECJ RULING 2.18.4 POST-RULING CASE 19: DIP SPA A.O. COMUNE DI
BASSANO GRAPPA JOINED CASES C-140-142/94 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 2.19.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.19.3 ECJ RULING 2.19.4 POST-RULING 239 240 240
240 241 241 242 242 242 243 243 244 244 244 245 245 247 249 250 250 250
251 251 251 251 252 253 254 254 254 254 255 257 257 257 257 258 259
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XIX 2.20 CASE 20: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST GIORGIO DOMINGO BANCHERO CASE C-387/93 259 2.20.1 BACKGROUND 259
2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 259 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 260 2.20.4
POST-RULING 262 2.21 CASE 21: DIEGO CALI & FIGLI SRI V. SERVIZI
ECOLOGICI PORTO DI GENOVA (SPEG) CASE C-343/95 262 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 262
2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 262 2.21.3 ECJ RULING 263 2.21.4
POST-RULING 264 2.22 CASE 22: SODEMARE SA A.O. V. REGIONE LOMBARDIA CASE
C-70/95 265 2.22.1 BACKGROUND 265 2.22.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 266
2.22.3 ECJ RULING 266 2.22.4 POST-RULING 267 2.23 CASE 23: JOB CENTRE II
CASE C-55/96 267 2.23.1 BACKGROUND 267 2.23.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 268
2.23.3 ECJ RULING 268 2.23.4 POST-RULING 269 2.24 CASE 24: SILVANO RASO
A.O. CASE C-163/96 270 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 270 2.24.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE
ECJ 270 2.24.3 ECJ RULING 271 2.24.4 POST-RULING 271 2.25 CASE 25:
VISCIDO AND OTHERS/ENTE POSTE ITALIANE JOINED CASES C-52-54/97 272
2.25.1 BACKGROUND 272 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 272 2.25.3 ECJ RULING
273 2.25.4 POST-RULING 273 2.26 CASE 26: CORSICA FERRIES FRANCE/GRUPPO
ANTICHI ORMEGGIATORI DEL PORTO DI GENOVA A. O. CAS E C-266/96 273 2.26.1
BACKGROUND 273 2.26.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 274 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 274
2.26.4 POST-RULING 276 2.27 CASE 27: AUTOTRASPORTI LIBRANDI CASE C-38/97
276 2.27.1 BACKGROUND 276 2.27.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 276 2.27.3 ECJ
RULING 278 2.27.4 POST-RULING 279 XX DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.28
CASE 28: ECOTRADE CASE C-200/97 280 2.28.1 BACKGROUND 280 2.28.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 281 2.28.3 ECJ RULING 282 2.28.4 POST-RULING 283
2.29 CASE 29: BAGNASCO JOINED CASES C-215-216/96 284 2.29.1 BACKGROUND
284 2.29.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 284 2.29.3 ECJ RULING 285 2.29.4
POST-RULING 287 2.30 CASE 30: RINALDO PIAGGIO CASE C-295/97 287 2.30.1
BACKGROUND 287 2.30.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 287 2.30.3 ECJ RULING 288
2.30.4 POST-RULING 289 2.31 CASE 31: CARRA AND OTHERS CASE C-258/98 289
2.31.1 BACKGROUND 289 2.31.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 289 2.31.3 ECJ RULING
290 2.31.4 POST-RULING 290 2.32 CASE 32: TNT TRACO SPA, POSTE ITALIANE
SPA CASE C-340/99 291 2.32.1 BACKGROUND 291 2.32.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ
291 2.32.3 ECJ RULING 292 2.32.4 POST-RULING 293 2.33 CASE 33: CONTE
CASE C-221/99 293 2.33.1 BACKGROUND 293 2.33.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 293
2.33.3 ECJ RULING 294 2.33.4 POST-RULING 295 2.34 CASE 34: CISAL DI
BATTISTELLO VENANZIO & C CASE C-218-00 295 2.34.1 BACKGROUND 295 2.34.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 296 2.34.3 ECJ RULING 296 2.34.4 POST-RULING 296
2.35 CASE 35: ARDUINO CASE C-35/99 297 2.35.1 BACKGROUND 297 2.35.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 297 2.35.3 ECJ RULING 297 2.35.4 POST-RULING 299
2.36 CASE 36: CONSORZIO INDUSTRIE FIAMMIFERI (CIF) CASE C-198/01 299
2.36.1 BACKGROUND 299 2.36.1.1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK 299 2.36.1.2 THE AGCM
DECISION 299 2.36.1.3 THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 300 DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS XXI 2.36.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 301 2.36.3 ECJ RULING 301
2.36.4 POST-RULING 304 2.37 CASE 37: ALTAIR CHIMICA CASE C-207/01 304
2.37.1 BACKGROUND 304 2.37.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 305 2.37.3 ECJ RULING
305 2.37.4 POST-RULING 306 2.38 CASE 38: ENIRISORSE CASES C-34-38/01 306
2.38.1 BACKGROUND 306 2.38.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 307 2.38.3 ECJ RULING
307 2.38.4 POST-RULING 309 CHAPTER 6 GERMANY 311 LISA LERNBORG 1.
INTRODUCTION 311 2. GERMAN CASES 314 2.1 CASE 1: WALT WILHELM, HANS
GOELZ, HANS ULRICH FINTELMANN, BADISCHE ANILIN-UND SODA-FABRIK AG,
FARBENFABRIK BAYER AG, FARBWERKE HOECHST AG, CASSELLA FARBWERKE MAINKUR
AG V. BUNDESKARTELLAMT CASE 14/68 316 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 316 2.1.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 316 2.1.3 ECJ RULING 317 2.1.4 POST-RULING 317 2.2
CASE 2: FRANZ VOELK V. ETABLISSEMENTS J. VERVAECKE (SOCIETE DE PERSONNES
A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE) CASE 5/69 318 2.2.1 BACKGROUND 318 2.2.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 318 2.2.3 ECJ RULING 318 2.2.4 POST-RULING 319 2.3
CASE 3: BRAUEREI A. BILGER SOEHNE GMBH V. HEINRICH JEHLE CASE 43/69 319
2.3.1 BACKGROUND 319 2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 320 2.3.3 ECJ RULING
320 2.3.4 POST-RULING 321 2.4 CASE 4: DEUTSCHE GRAMMOPHON GESELLSCHAFT
MBH V. METRO- SB-GROSSMAERKTE GMBH AND COMPANY KG, REPRESENTED BY THE
COMPANY METRO-SB-GROSSMAERKTE GMBH CASE 78/70 322 2.4.1 BACKGROUND 322
2.4.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 322 XXII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4.3
ECJ RULING 322 2.4.4 POST-RULING 323 2.5 CASE 5: PARFUMS MARCEL ROCHAS
VERTRIEBS-GMBH V. HELMUT BITSCH CASE 1/70 324 2.5.1 BACKGROUND 324 2.5.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 324 2.5.3 ECJ RULING 325 2.5.4 POST-RULING 325 2.6
CASE 6: EMI RECORDS LIMITED V. CBS SCHALLPLATTEN GMBH CASE 96/75 325
2.6.1 BACKGROUND 325 2.6.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 326 2.6.3 ECJ RULING 326
2.6.4 POST-RULING 327 2.7 CASE 7: HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE & CO. AG AND
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, GRENZACH-WYHLEN V. CENTRAFARM
VERTRIEBSGESELLSCHAFT PHARMAZEUTISCHER ERZEUGNISSE MBH CASE 102/77 327
2.7.1 BACKGROUND 327 2.7.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 327 2.7.3 ECJ RULING
328 2.7.4 POST-RULING 328 2.8 CASE 8: GERHARD ZUECHNER, ROSENHEIM V.
BAYERSICHE VEREINSBANK AG CASE 172/80 329 2.8.1 BACKGROUND 329 2.8.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 329 2.8.3 ECJ RULING 329 2.8.4 POST-RULING 330 2.9
CASE 9: SOCIETE DE VENTE DE CIMENTS ET BETONS DE L'EST SA V. KERPEN &
KERPEN GMBH & CO. KG CASE 319/82 330 2.9.1 BACKGROUND 330 2.9.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 330 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 331 2.9.4 POST-RULING 331
2.10 CASE 10: HYDROTHERM GERATEBAU GMBH V. COMPACT DEL DOTT. ING. MARIO
ANDREOLI & C. SAS CASE 170/83 332 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 332 2.10.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 332 2.10.3 ECJ RULING 333 2.10.4 POST-RULING 334 2.11 CASE
11: PRONUPTIA DE PARIS GMBH V. PRONUPTIA DE PARIS IRMGARD SCHILLGALIS
CASE 161/84 335 2.11.1 BACKGROUND 335 2.11.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 335
2.11.3 ECJ RULING 336 2.11.4 POST-RULING 336 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
XXIII 2.12 CASE 12: BAYER AG AND MACHINENFABRIK HENNECKE GMBH V. HEINZ
SUELLHOEFER CASE 65/86 337 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 337 2.12.2 QUESTION FOR THE
ECJ 338 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 338 2.12.4 POST-RULING 339 2.13 CASE 13: AHMED
SAEED FLUGREISEN AND SILVER LINE REISEBUERO GMBH V. ZENTRALE ZUR
BEKAEMPFUNG UNLAUTEREN WETTBEWERBS E.V. (REGISTERED ASSOCIATION FOR THE
CAMPAIGN AGAINST UNFAIR COMPETITION) CASE 66/86 340 2.13.1 BACKGROUND
340 2.13.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 340 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 341 2.13.4
POST-RULING 343 2.14 CASE 14: STERGIOS DELIMITIS V. HENNINGER BRAEU AG
CASE 234/89 344 2.14.1 BACKGROUND 344 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 345
2.14.3 ECJ RULING 346 2.14.4 POST-RULING 348 2.15 CASE 15: KLAUS HOEFNER
AND FRITZ ELSER V. MACROTRON GMBH CASE C-41/90 348 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 348
2.15.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 348 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 349 2.15.4 POST-RULING
349 2.16 CASE 16: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY V. WOLFW. MENG CASE C-2/91
350 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 350 2.16.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 350 2.16.3 ECJ
RULING 350 2.16.4 POST-RULING 351 2.17 CASE 17: BUNDESANSTALT FUER DEN
GUETETFERNVERKEHR V. GEBRUEDER REIFF GMBH & CO. KG CASE C-185/91 351
2.17.1 BACKGROUND 351 2.17.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 352 2.17.3 ECJ RULING
352 2.17.4 POST-RULING 352 2.18 CASE 18: METRO SB-GROSSMAERKTE GMBH &
CO. KG V. CARTIER SA CASE C-376/92 353 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 353 2.18.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 353 2.18.3 ECJ RULING 353 2.18.4 POST-RULING 354
XXIV DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.19 CASE 19: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF
GERMANY V. DELTA SCHIFFAHRTS-UND SPEDITIONSGESELLSCHAFT MBH CASE C-15/93
355 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 355 2.19.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 355 2.19.3 ECJ
RULING 355 2.19.4 POST-RULING 356 2.20 CASE 20: BAYERISCHE MOTORENWERKE
AG V. ALD AUTO-LEASING D GMBH CASE C-70/93 356 2.20.1 BACKGROUND 356
2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 357 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 357 2.20.4
POST-RULING 358 2.21 CASE 21: BUNDESKARTELLAMT V. VOLKSWAGEN AG, VAG
LEASING GMBH, SUPPORTED BY VAG-HAENDLERBEIRAT EV, INTERVENER CASE
C-266/93 359 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 359 2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 359
2.21.3 ECJ RULING 360 2.21.4 POST-RULING 360 2.22 CASE 22:
VAG-HDNDLERBEIRAT EV V. SYD-CONSULT CASE C-41/96 361 2.22.1 BACKGROUND
361 2.22.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 361 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 362 2.22.4
POST-RULING 362 2.23 CASE 23: DEUTSCHE POST AG V. GESELLSCHAFT FUR
ZAHLUNGSSYSTEME MBH (GZS), (C-147/97) AND CITICORP KARTENSERVICE GMBH
(C-148/97) CASES C-147 & 148/97 363 2.23.1 BACKGROUND 363 2.23.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 363 2.23.3 ECJ RULING 364 2.23.4 POST-RULING 365
2.24 CASE 24: G PREUSSENELEKTRA AG V. SCHLESWAG AG IN THE PRESENCE OF
WINDPARK REUFIENKOGE III GMBH AND LAND SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN CASE C-379/98
366 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 366 2.24.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 366 2.24.3 ECJ
RULING 367 2.24.4 POST-RULING 368 2.25 CASE 25: AMBULANZ GLOECKNER V.
LANDKREIS SUEDWESTPFALZ; JOINED PARTIES: ARBEITER-SAMARITER-BUND
LANDESVERBAND RHEINLAND-PFALZ EV, DEUTSCHES ROTES KREUTZ LANDESVERBAND
RHEINLAND-PFALZ EV AND VERTRETER DES OEFFENTLICHEN INTERESSES CASE
C-475/99 368 2.25.1 BACKGROUND 368 2.25.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 368
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXV 2.25.3 ECJ RULING 368 2.25.4 POST-RULING
369 2.26 CASE 26: 7. AOK BUNDESVERBAND, 2. BUNDESVERBAND DER
BETRIEBSKASSEN (BKK), 3. BUNDESVERBAND DER INNUNGSKRANKENKASSEN, 4.
BUNDESVERBAND DER LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHEN KRANKENKASSEN, 5. VERBAND DER
ANGESTELLTENKRANKENKASSEN EV, 6. VERBAND DER ARBEITER-ERSATZKASSEN, 7.
BUNDESKNAPPSCHAFT, 8. SEE-KRANKENKASSE V. ICHTHYOL-GESELLSCHAFT CORDES,
HERMANI & CO. (C-264/01); MUNDIPHARMA GMBH (C-306/01); GODECKE GMBH (C-3
54/01); INTERSAN, INSTITUT FUR PHARMAZEUTISCHE UND KLINISCHE FORSCHUNG
GMBH (C-355/01) CASES C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 & C-355/01 370 2.26.1
BACKGROUND 370 2.26.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 371 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 373
2.26.4 POST-RULING 374 2.27 CASE 27: IMS HEALTH GMBH & CO. OHG V. NDC
HEALTH GMBH & CO. KG CASE C-418/01 374 2.27.1 BACKGROUND 374 2.27.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 375 2.27.3 ECJ RULING 375 2.27.4 POST-RULING 376
CHAPTER 7 BELGIUM 377 MARIANNE DONY AND CAROLE MOAL-NUYTS 1.
INTRODUCTION 377 1.1 MULTIPLICITY OF BELGIAN REFERENCES TO THE ECJ 378
1.1.1 FREQUENCY OF REFERENCES 378 1.1.2 EXPERIENCE OF SIMILAR REFERENCE
PROCEDURES 380 1.1.3 OTHER EXPLANATORY FACTORS 381 1.2 DIVERSITY OF
REFERRING COURTS 382 1.2.1 VARIOUS IDENTITIES OF THE REFERRING COURTS
382 1.2.2 LEVEL OF COURT REFERRING 383 1.3 FORM, RELEVANCE AND FOLLOW UP
TO PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS 385 1.3.1 FORM 385 1.3.2 RELEVANCE 386 1.3.2.1
FOLLOW UP 386 2. BELGIAN CASES 387 2.1 CASE 1: SA BRASSERIE DE HAECHT V.
CONSORTS WILKIN-JANSSENS CASE 23/67 388 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 388 XXVI
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4
CASE QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 2: SA PORTELANGE V. SA
SMITH CORONA MARCHANT INTERNATIONAL ET AL. CASE 10/69 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3
2.2.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 3: SA
BRASSERIE DE HAECHT V. CONSORTS WILKIN-JANSSENS CASE 48/72 2.3.1 2.3.2
2.3.3 2.3.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING
4: BELGISCHE RADIO EN TELEVISIE V. SV SABAM AND NV FONIOR (BRT-I AND
BRT-II) CASE 127/73 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 5: PROCUREUR DU ROI V. BENOIT AND
GUSTAVE DASSONVILLE CASE 8/74 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 CASE CLERQ 2.6.1
2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING 6: ALEXIS DE NORRE AND HIS WIFE MARTINE, NEE DE \ V. NV
BROUWERIJ CONCORDIA CASE 47/76 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ
RULING POST-RULING 7: SA G.B.-INNO-B.M. V. ASSOCIATION DES DETAILLANTS
EN TABAC (ATAB) CASE 13/77 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4 CASE BACKGROUND
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 8: ETABLISSEMENTS A. DE
BLOOS SPRL V. SOCIETE EN COMMANDITE PAR ACTIONS BOUYER CASE 59/77 2.8.1
2.8.2 2.8.3 2.8.4 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING 388 389 389 390 390 390 390 391 391 391 391 392 393 393 393
394 395 396 396 396 397 397 398 398 398 398 399 399 400 400 400 401 402
402 402 403 403 404 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXVII 2.9 CASE 9: NV
L'OREAL AND SA L'OREAL V. PVBA *DE NIEUWE AMCK' CASE 31/80 404 2.9.1
BACKGROUND 404 2.9.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 404 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 405
2.9.4 POST-RULING 407 2.10 CASE 10: CODITEL SA, COMPAGNIE GENERATE POUR
LA DIFFUSION DE LA TELEVISION, ET AL. V. CINE-VOG FINIS SA ET AL. CASE
262/81 407 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 407 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 408 2.10.3
ECJ RULING 409 2.10.4 POST-RULING 410 2.11 CASE 11: SA BINON & CIE V. SA
AGENCE ET MESSAGERIES DE LA PRESSE CASE 243/83 410 2.11.1 BACKGROUND 410
2.11.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 410 2.11.3 ECJ RULING 411 2.11.4
POST-RULING 413 2.12 CASE 12: CENTRE BEIGE D'ETUDES DE MARCHE *
TELEMARKETING (CBEM) V. SA COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE TELEDIFFUSION
(CLT) AND INFORMATION PUBLICITE BENELUX (IPB) CASE 311/84 413 2.12.1
BACKGROUND 413 2.12.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 414 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 414
2.12.4 POST-RULING 415 2.13 CASE 13: ETA FABRIQUES D'EBAUCHES V. SA DK
INVESTMENT ET AL. CASE 31/85 415 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 415 2.13.2 QUESTION
FOR THE ECJ 415 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 416 2.13.4 POST-RULING 417 2.14 CASE
14: ASBL VEREINIGING VAN VLAAMSE REISBUREAUS V. ASBL SOCIALE DIENST VAN
DE PLAATSELIJKE EN GEWESTELIJKE OVERHEIDSDIENSTEN CASE 311/85 417 2.14.1
BACKGROUND 417 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 417 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 418
2.14.4 POST-RULING 418 2.15 CASE 15: SPRL LOUIS ERAUW-JACQUERY V. LA
HESBIGNONNE SC CASE 27/87 419 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 419 2.15.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 419 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 419 2.15.4 POST-RULING 420 XXVIII DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 CASE 16: PASCAL VAN
EYCKE V. ASPA NV CASE 267/86 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 2.16.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE
ECJ 2.16.3 ECJ RULING 2.16.4 POST-RULING CASE 17: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST ANDRE MARCHANDISE, JEAN-MARIE CHAPUIS AND SA TRAFITEX CASE
267/86 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 2.17.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.17.3 ECJ RULING
2.17.4 POST-RULING CASE 18: REGIE DES TELEGRAPHES ET DES TELEPHONES V.
GB-INNO-BM SA CASE 18/88 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 2.18.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ
2.18.3 ECJ RULING 2.18.4 POST-RULING CASE 19: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST PAUL CORBEAU CASE C-320/91 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 2.19.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 2.19.3 ECJ RULING 2.19.4 POST-RULING CASE 20: PROCUREUR DU
ROI V. JEAN-MARIE LAGAUCHE ET AL. JOINED CASES C-46/90 AND C-93/91
2.20.1 BACKGROUND 2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 2.20.4
POST-RULING CASE 21: SAT FLUGGESELLSCHAFT MBH V. EUROCONTROL CASE
C-364/92 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 2.21.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.21.3 ECJ RULING
2.21.4 POST-RULING CASE 22: NAMUR-LES ASSURANCES DU CREDIT SA V. OFFICE
NATIONAL DU DUCROIRE AND THE BELGIAN STATE CASE C-44/93 2.22.1
BACKGROUND 2.22.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 2.22.4
POST-RULING 420 420 420 421 422 422 422 422 422 423 423 423 423 424 425
425 425 425 426 426 426 426 427 428 429 430 430 430 430 431 431 431 432
432 433 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXIX 2.23 CASE 23: UNION ROYALE BEIGE
DES SOCIETES DE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION ASBL V. JEAN-MARC BOSNIAN, ROYAL
CLUB LIEGEOIS SA V. JEAN-MARC BOSNIAN ET AL. AND UNION DES ASSOCIATIONS
EUROPEENNES DE FOOTBALL (UEFA) V. JEAN-MARC BOSNIAN CASE C-415/93 434
2.23.1 BACKGROUND 434 2.23.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 434 2.23.3 ECJ RULING
434 2.23.4 POST-RULING 435 2.24 CASE 24: DEMENAGEMENTS - MANUTENTION
TRANSPORTS SA (DMT) CASE C-256/97 436 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 436 2.24.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 436 2.24.3 ECJ RULING 437 2.24.4 POST-RULING 438
2.25 CASE 25: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JEAN CLAUDE BECU, ANNIE
VERWEIRE, SMEG NV AND ADIA INTERIM NV CASE C-22/98 438 2.25.1 BACKGROUND
438 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 438 2.25.3 ECJ RULING 439 2.25.4
POST-RULING 440 2.26 CASE 26: BELGISCHE STAAT AND EUGENE VAN CALSTER,
FELIX CLEEREN (C-261/01) AND BETWEEN BELGISCHE STAAT AND OPENBAAR
SLACHTHUIS NV (C-262/01) JOINED CASES C-261-262/01 440 2.26.1 BACKGROUND
440 2.26.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 440 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 441 2.26.4
POST-RULING 442 " CHAPTER 8 THE NETHERLANDS 443 NARIN TEZCAN, JEROEN
BOOT AND PIET JAN SLOT 1. INTRODUCTION 443 2. THE NETHERLANDS CASES 446
2.1 CASE 1: KLEDINGVERKOOPBEDRIJF DE GEUS EN UITDENBOGERD V. ROBERT
BOSCH GMBH AND MAATSCHAPPIJ TOT VOORTZETTING VAN DE ZAKEN DER FIRMA
WILLEM VAN RIJN CASE 13/61 447 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 447 2.1.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 448 2.1.3 ERJ RULING 448 2.1.4 POST-RULING 449 XXX DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.2 CASE 2: PARKE, DAVIS AND CO. V. PROBEL, REESE, 2.3
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 BIENTEMA-INTERPHARM AND CENTRAFARM CASE 24/67
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 CASE DRUG 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 CASE
BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 3: CENTRAFARM BV
ET ADRIAAN DE PEIJPER V. STERLING INC. CASE 15/74 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 4: CENTRAFARM BV ET ADRIAAN DE
PEIJPER V. WINTHROP BV CASE 16/74 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 CASE
BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 5: VAN VLIET
KWASTEN - EN LADDERFABRIEK NV V. FRATELLI DALLE CRODE CASE 25/75 2.5.1
2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING 6: VEREENIGING TER BEVORDERING VAN DE BELANGEN DES
BOEKHANDELS ET AL. V. ELDI RECORDS BV CASE 106/79 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3
2.6.4 CASE ETOS 2.1.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4 CASE 2.8.1 2.8.2 2.8.3 2.8.4
CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 7: SA
LANCOME AND COSPARFRANCE NEDERLAND BV V. BV AND ALBERT HEYN SUPERMAN BV
CASE 99/79 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 8:
KEURKOOP BV V. NANCY KEAN GIFTS BV CASE 144/81 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 9: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JAN VAN
DE HAAR AND KAVEKA DE MEERN BV JOINED CASES 177 AND 178/82 2.9.1 2.9.2
BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 449 449 449 450 450 451 451 451 451 452
452 452 453 453 453 453 453 454 454 455 455 455 456 457 457 458 458 458
459 460 461 461 461 462 463 463 463 464 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXXI
2.9.3 ECJ RULING 464 2.9.4 POST-RULING 465 2.10 CASE 10: OTTO BV V.
POSTBANK NV CASE C-60/92 465 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 465 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 466 2.10.3 ECJ RULING 466 2.10.4 POST-RULING 467 2.11 CRIMINAL
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST OHRA SCHADEVERZEKERINGEN NV C-245/91 467 2.11.1
BACKGROUND 467 2.11.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 468 2.11.3 ECJ RULING 468
2.11.4 POST-RULING 469 2.12 CASE 12: MUNICIPALITY OF ALMELO ET AL. V. NV
ENERGIEBEDRIJF IJSSELMIJ CASE C-393/92 469 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 469 2.12.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 470 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 470 2.12.4 POST-RULING 472
2.13 CASE 13: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST TANKSTATION 'T HEUKSKE VOF
AND J. B. E. BOERMANS C-401/92 AND C-402/92 472 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 472
2.13.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 473 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 473 2.13.4 POST-RULING
474 2.14 CASE 14: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JOHANNES GERRIT CORNELLS
VAN SCHAIK CASE C-55/93 474 2.14.1 BACKGROUND 474 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 474 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 475 2.14.4 POST-RULING 475 2.15 CASE 15:
DIJKSTRA ET AL. V. FRIESLAND (FRICO DOMO) COOPERATIE ET AL. JOINED CASES
C-319/93, C-40/94 AND C-224/94 475 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 475 2.15.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 476 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 477 2.15.4 POST-RULING 478
2.16 CASE 16: H. G. OUDE LUTTIKHUIS ET AL. V. VERENIGDE COOPERATIEVE
MELKINDUSTRIE COBERCO BA CASE C-399/93 479 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 479 2.16.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 479 2.16.3 ECJ RULING 480 2.16.4 POST-RULING 481
XXXII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.17 CASE 17: KONINKLIJKE VEREENIGING
TER BEVORDERING VAN DE BELANGEN DES BOEKHANDELS V. FREE RECORD SHOP BV
AND FREE RECORD SHOP HOLDING NV CASE C-39/96 481 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 481
2.17.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 482 2.17.3 ECJ RULING 482 2.17.4
POST-RULING 483 2.18 CASE 18: CHEMISCHE AFVALSTOFFEN DUSSELDORP BV ET
AL. V. MINISTER VAN VOLKHUISVESTING, RUIMTELIJKE ORDENING EN
MILIEUBEHEER CASE C-203/96 483 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 483 2.18.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 484 2.18.3 ECJ RULING 484 2.18.4 POST-RULING 485 2.19 CASE 19:
ECO SWISS CHINA TIME LTD V. BENETTON INTERNATIONAL NV CASE C-126/97 485
2.19.1 BACKGROUND 485 2.19.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 486 2.19.3 ECJ RULING
487 2.19.4 POST-RULING 488 2.20 CASE 20: ALBANY INTERNATIONAL BV V.
STICHTING BEDRIJFSPENSIOENFONDS TEXTIELINDUSTRIE CASE C-67/96 488 2.20.1
BACKGROUND 488 2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 489 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 490
2.20.4 POST-RULING 492 2.21 CASE 21: BRENTJENS' HANDELSONDERNEMING BV V.
STICHTING BEDRIJFSPENSIOENFONDS VOOR DE HANDEL IN BOUWMATERIALEN CASE
C-115/97 TO C-117/97 493 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 493 2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE
ECJ 493 2.21.3 ECJ RULING 494 2.21.4 POST-RULING 495 2.22 CASE 22:
MAATSCHAPPIJ DRIJVENDE BOKKEN BV V. STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS VOOR DE
VERVOER-EN HAVENBEDRIJVEN CASE C-219/97 495 2.22.1 BACKGROUND 495 2.22.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 496 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 497 2.22.4 POST-RULING 498
2.23 CASE 23: PAVEL PAVLOV ET AL. V. STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS MEDISCHE
SPECIALISTEN JOINED CASES C-180/98 TO C-184/98 498 2.23.1 BACKGROUND 498
2.23.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 500 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXXIII
2.23.3 ECJ RULING 500 2.23.4 POST-RULING 502 2.24 CASE 24: HENDRIK VAN
DER WOUDE V. STICHTING BEATRIXOORD CASE 222/98 502 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 502
2.24.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 503 2.24.3 ECJ RULING 503 2.24.4 POST-RULING
504 2.25 CASE 25: J.C.J. WOUTERS, J.W. SAVELBERGH, PRICE WATERHOUSE
BELASTINGADVISEURS BV V. ALGEMENE RAAD VAN DE NEDERLANDSE ORDE VAN
ADVOCATEN CASE C-309/99 504 2.25.1 BACKGROUND 504 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 505 2.25.3 ECJ RULING 507 2.25.4 POST-RULING 509 CHAPTER 9
COUNTRIES WITH 3-5 RULINGS: DENMARK, PORTUGAL AND THE UNITED KINGDOM 511
ULLA NEERGAARD, LEONOR ROSSI AND SOFIA GERALDES, AND BARRY RODGER 1.
DENMARK 511 1.1 INTRODUCTION 511 1.2 DANISH CASES 515 1.2.1 CASE 1: EMI
RECORDS LIMITED V. CBS GRAMMOFON A/S CASE 86/75 515 1.2.1.1 BACKGROUND
515 1.2.1.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 516 1.2.1.3 ECJ RULING 516 1.2.1.4
POST-RULING 517 1.2.2 CASE 2: KAI OTTUNG V. KLEE &WWEILBACH A/S AND
THOMAS SCHMIDT A/S CASE 320/87 517 1.2.2.1 BACKGROUND 517 1.2.2.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 518 1.2.2.3 ECJ RULING 518 1.2.2.4 POST-RULING 519
1.2.3 CASE 3: GOETTRUP-KLIM GROVVAREFORENING ET AL. V. DANSK LANDBRUGS
GROVVARESELSKAB AMBA (DLG) CASE C-250/92 519 1.2.3.1 BACKGROUND 519
1.2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 520 1.2.3.3 ECJ RULING 520 1.2.3.4
POST-RULING 521 1.2.4 CASE 4: GT-LINK A/S V. DE DANSKE STATSBANER (DSB)
CASE C- 242/95 522 XXXIV DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.2.4.1 BACKGROUND
522 1.2.4.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 522 1.2.4.3 ECJ RULING 523 1.2.4.4
POST-RULING 524 1.2.5 CASE 5: ENTREPREN0RFORENINGENS
AJFALDS/MILJ0SEKTION (FFAD), ACTING FOR SYDHAVNENS STEN & GRUS APS V.
K0BENHAVNS KOMMUNE CASE C-209/98 525 1.2.5.1 BACKGROUND 525 1.2.5.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 526 1.2.5.3 ECJ RULING 526 1.2.5.4 POST-RULING 528
2. PORTUGAL 528 2.1 INTRODUCTION 528 2.1.1 RELEVANT FACTORS 530 2.1.1.1
POLITICAL FACTORS 530 2.1.1.2 INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS 531 2.1.1.3 OUTLOOK
AND FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS 532 2.2 PORTUGUESE CASES 532 2.2.1 CASE 1:
BATISTA MORAIS V. PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC CASE C-60/91 532 2.2.1.1
BACKGROUND 532 2.2.1.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 533 2.2.1.3 ECJ RULING 533
2.2.1.4 POST-RULING 534 2.2.2 CASE 2: PETROGAL SA V. CORREIA SIMOES &
CORREIA, SOUSA & CRISOSTOMO, LDA. CASE C-39/92 534 2.2.2.1 BACKGROUND
534 2.2.2.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 535 2.2.2.3 ECJ RULING 535 2.2.2.4
POST-RULING 536 2.2.3 CASE 3: FLIGHTLINE CASE C-181/00 536 2.2.3.1
BACKGROUND 536 2.2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 537 2.2.3.3 ECJ RULING 538
2.2.3.4 POST RULING 538 3. UNITED KINGDOM 539 3.1 INTRODUCTION 539 3.2
UK CASES 540 3.2.1 CASE 1: EMI RECORDS LTD V. CBS UNITED KINGDOM LTD
CASE 51/75 541 3.2.1.1 BACKGROUND 541 3.2.1.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 542
3.2.1.3 ECJ RULING 542 3.2.1.4 POST-RULING 543 DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS XXXV 3.2.2 CASE 2: AB VOLVO V. ERIK VENG (UK) LIMITED 3.2.3
3.2.4 3.2.5 CASE 238/87 3.2.2.1 BACKGROUND 3.2.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ
3.2.2.3 ECJ RULING 3.2.2.4 POST-RULING CASE 3: COURAGE LTD V. CREHAN
(ALSO KNOWN AS CREHAN V. COURAGE LTD) CASE C-453/99 3.2.3.1 BACKGROUND
3.2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.2.3.3 ECJ RULING 3.2.3.4 POST-RULING
CASE 4: R V. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION EX PARTE MILK MARQUE LTD CASE
C-137/00 3.2.4.1 BACKGROUND 3.2.4.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.2.4.3 ECJ
RULING 3.2.4.4 POST-RULING CASE 5: G/L INSURANCE LTD ET AL. V.
COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE CASE C-308/01 3.2.5.1 BACKGROUND
3.2.5.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.2.5.3 C/ FLW/MG 3.2.5.4 POST-RULING 543
543 543 544 544 545 545 546 546 549 552 552 552 553 555 555 555 555 556
557 CHAPTER 10 COUNTRIES WITH 1-2 RULINGS: AUSTRIA, FINLAND, GREECE,
IRELAND, LUXEMBOURG AND SPAIN 559 ROBERT SCHMIDBAUER, ANTTI AINE,
ASSIMAKIS KOMNINOS, HARA NIKOLOPOULOU, DERMOT CAHILL, ELAINE FAHEY,
MARIANNE DONY, CAROLE MOAL-NUYTS, TERESA RODRIGUEZ DE LAS HERAS BALLELL
AND MANUEL ALBA FERNANDEZ 1. AUSTRIA 559 1.1 INTRODUCTION 559 1.1.1
RELEVANT FACTORS 560 1.1.1.1 POLITICAL FACTORS 561 1.1.1.2 INSTITUTIONAL
FACTORS 562 1.1.2 OUTLOOK AND FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS 562 1.2 CASE 1:
BRONNER V. MEDIAPRINT CASE C-7/97 563 1.2.1 BACKGROUND 563 1.2.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 563 1.2.3 ECJ RULING 564 1.2.4 POST-RULING 565
XXXVI DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.3 CASE 2: ADRIA-WIEN PIPELINE AND
WIETERSDORFER & PEGGAUER CASE C-143/99 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 2.
FINLAND 2.1 2.2 GENERA] BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING I NESTE MARKKINOINTI V. YOTUULI YM. CASE C-214/99 2.2.1
2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 3. GREECE 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE
ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING INTRODUCTION DISAPPOINTMENT 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3
POLITICAL FACTORS INSTITUTIONAL/SOCIOLOGICAL FACTORS FACTORS RELEVANT TO
COMPETITION LAW ENFORCEMENT IN GREECE THE MEAGRE RECORD: ASTERIS AND ERT
3.3.1 3.3.2 HOPE 4. IRELAND 4.1 4.2 CASE 1: ASTERIS AE ET AL. V.
HELLENIC REPUBLIC AND EEC JOINED CASES C-106 TO 120/87 3.3.1.1
BACKGROUND 3.3.1.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.3.1.3 ECJ RULING 3.3.1.4
POST-RULING CASE 2: ELLINIKI RADIOPHONIA TILEORASI AE AND PANELLINIA
OMOSPONDIA SYLLOGON PROSSOPIKOU V. DIMOTIKI ETARIA PLIROFORISSIS AND
SOTIRIOS KOUVELAS AND NICOLAOS AVDELLAS ET AL. CASE C-260/89 3.3.2.1
BACKGROUND 3.3.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.3.2.3 ECJ RULING 3.3.2.4
POST-RULING INTRODUCTION 4.1.1 4.1.2 RATE OF REFERENCES AREAS OF
LAW/COURTS INVOLVED MASTERFOODS LTD V. HB ICE CREAM LTD CASE C-344/98
4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULINE 565 565 566 566 568 569 569 569 569 570 570 571 572 572 572
572 573 574 575 576 576 576 577 578 578 578 579 580 580 580 583 583 583
586 587 587 588 588 589 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXXVII 5. LUXEMBOURG
590 5.1 INTRODUCTION 590 5.2 MINISTERE PUBLIC LUXEMBOURGEOIS V.
MADELEINE MIDLER, VEUVE J.P. HEIN ET AL. CASE C-10/71 591 5.2.1
BACKGROUND 591 5.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 591 5.2.3 ECJ RULING 591
5.2.4 POST-RULING 592 6. SPAIN 593 6.1 INTRODUCTION 593 6.1.1 RATE OF
REFERENCES 593 6.1.2 AREAS OF LAW/COURTS INVOLVED 594 6.2 CASE 1:
DIRECTION GENERAL DE DEFENSA DE LA COMPETENCIA V. ASOCIACION ESPANOLA DE
BANCA PRIVADA ET AL., CASE 67/91 595 6.2.1 BACKGROUND 595 6.2.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 595 6.2.3 ECJ RULING 596 6.2.4 POST-RULING 598 6.3
CASE 2: ESSO ESPANOLA S.A. V. COMUNIDAD AUTONOMA DE CANARIAS CASE 134/94
598 6.3.1 BACKGROUND 598 6.3.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 598 6.3.3 ECJ RULING
599 6.3.4 POST-RULING 599 INDEX 601 |
| adam_txt |
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS ALPHABETICAL TABLE OF CASES XXXIX
CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE OF CASES XLVII CONTRIBUTOR BIOGRAPHIES LV
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LXIII FOREWORD LXV MIGUEL POIARES MADURO, ADVOCATE
GENERAL, ECJ PARTI INTRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS BARRY RODGER CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION - BACKGROUND AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3 1. INTRODUCTION 3
2. ARTICLE 234 AND ITS CRUCIAL ROLE 4 3. BACKGROUND LITERATURE AND
RESEARCH 7 4. UNDERTAKING THE RESEARCH 10 4.1 RESEARCH AIMS AND PROPOSED
OUTCOMES 10 4.2 METHODOLOGY 12 4.2.1 COMPILING THE DATABASE OF CASES 12
VIII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.2.2 SUBSTANTIVE SCOPE OF THE RESEARCH:
COMPETITION LAW-RELATED RULINGS 14 4.2.3 ROLE OF THE RAPPORTEURS 15
4.2.4 DIFFICULTIES/LIMITATIONS 16 5. BOOK LAYOUT 18 CHAPTER 2 NUMBER AND
SOURCE OF ECJ RULINGS 21 21 22 28 29 31 31 35 36 37 38 41 43 43 47 47 48
50 51 55 57 59 60 64 65 65 66 66 CHAPTER 3 ECJ RULINGS AND THE
POST-RULING PROCESS 67 1. INTRODUCTION 67 2. COMPETITION LAW ISSUES 68
2.1 FRANCE 72 2.2 ITALY 73 2.3 GERMANY 74 1. 2. 3. 4. INTRODUCTION
NUMBER OF RULINGS AND PERIODIC RULINGS 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8
2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 KEY] FRANCE ITALY GERMANY BELGIUM THE
NETHERLANDS DENMARK PORTUGAL UNITED KINGDOM AUSTRIA FINLAND GREECE
IRELAND LUXEMBOURG SPAIN PERIOD RULINGS SOURCE OF REFERENCES 4.1 4.2 4.3
4.4 4.5 4.6 FRANCE ITALY GERMANY BELGIUM THE NETHERLANDS COUNTRIES WITH
3-5 RULINGS 4.6.1 DENMARK 4.6.2 PORTUGAL 4.6.3 UK DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS IX 2.4 BELGIUM 75 2.5 THE NETHERLANDS 76 2.6 COUNTRIES WITH 3-5
RULINGS 77 2.6.1 DENMARK 77 2.6.2 PORTUGAL 78 2.6.3 UK 78 2.7 COUNTRIES
WITH 1-2 RULINGS 79 2.7.1 AUSTRIA 79 2.7.2 FINLAND 79 2.7.3 GREECE 79
2.7.4 IRELAND 79 2.7.5 LUXEMBOURG 79 2.7.6 SPAIN 80 3. LENGTH OF ECJ
COMPETITION RULINGS 80 4. ECJ COMPETITION RULING DELAYS 81 5.
POST-RULING PROCESS 83 5.1 FRANCE 87 5.2 ITALY 89 5.3 GERMANY 93 5.4
BELGIUM 98 5.5 THE NETHERLANDS 100 5.6 COUNTRIES WITH 3-5 RULINGS 102
5.6.1 DENMARK 102 5.6.2 PORTUGAL 104 5.6.3 UK 105 5.7 COUNTRIES WITH 1-2
RULINGS 105 5.7.1 AUSTRIA 105 5.7.2 FINLAND 106 5.7.3 GREECE 106 5.7.4
IRELAND 106 5.7.5 LUXEMBOURG 106 5.7.6 SPAIN 106 6. EVIDENCE OF IMPACT
OF ECJ COMPETITION LAW RULINGS 107 6.1 LANDMARK ECJ COMPETITION LAW
RULINGS 107 6.1.1 FRANCE 108 6.1.2 ITALY 110 6.1.3 GERMANY 118 6.1.4
BELGIUM 124 6.1.5 NETHERLANDS 127 6.1.6 COUNTRIES WITH 3-5 RULINGS 134
6.1.7 COUNTRIES WITH 1-2 RULINGS 138 6.2 ECJ RULINGS AND THE CREATION OF
A LEGAL COMPETITION CULTURE IN THE COMMUNITY 141 7. CONCLUSIONS 145 X
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS PART II MEMBER STATE REPORTS 147 NATIONAL
RAPPORTEURS CHAPTER 4 FRANCE 149 GUILLAUME TAILLANDIER 1. INTRODUCTION
149 1.1 ANALYSIS OF FRENCH COURTS'REFERENCES 150 1.2 SUBJECT MATTER OF
THE DECISIONS REFERRED 151 1.3 RULING AND POST-RULING PROCESS 152 2.
FRENCH CASES 153 2.1 CASE 1: SOCIETE TECHNIQUE MINIERE (LTM) V.
MASCHINENBAU ULM GMBH (MBU) CASE 56/65 155 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 155 2.1.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 155 2.1.3 ECJ RULING 155 2.1.4 POST-RULING 156 2.2
CASE 2: SOCIETE ANONYME CADILLON V. FIRMA HOSS, MASCHINENBAU KG CASE
1/71 157 2.2.1 BACKGROUND 157 2.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 157 2.2.3 ECJ
RULING 157 2.2.4 POST-RULING 158 2.3 CASE 3: BEGUELIN IMPORT CO. V.
S.A.G.L. IMPORT EXPORT CASE 22/71 158 2.3.1 BACKGROUND 158 2.3.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 158 2.3.3 ECJ RULING 158 2.3.4 POST-RULING 159 2.4
CASE 4: FONDERIES ROUBAIX WATTRELOS V. FONDERIES ROUX AND FONDERIES JOT
CASE 63/75 159 2.4.1 BACKGROUND 159 2.4.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 160 2.4.3
ECJ RULING 160 2.4.4 POST-RULING 160 2.5 CASE 5: PROCUREUR GENERAL V.
HANS BUYS, HAN PESCH ET YVES DULLIEUX ET DENKAVIT FRANCE SARL CASE 5/79
161 2.5.1 BACKGROUND 161 2.5.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 161 2.5.3 ECJ RULING
161 2.5.4 POST-RULING 161 2.6 CASE 6: GREENWICH FILM V. SACEM CASE 22/79
161 2.6.1 BACKGROUND 161 2.6.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 162 DETAILED TABLE
OF CONTENTS XI 2.6.3 ECJ RULING 162 2.6.4 POST-RULING 162 2.7 CASE 7:
ANNE MARTY SA V. ESTEE LAUDER SA CASE 37/79 162 2.7.1 BACKGROUND 162
2.7.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 163 2.7.3 ECJ RULING 163 2.7.4 POST-RULING
164 2.8 CASE 8: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE AND OTHERS V. BRUNO GIRY AND
GUERLAIN SA AND OTHERS JOINED CASES 253/78 AND 1-3/79 164 2.8.1
BACKGROUND 164 2.8.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 164 2.8.3 ECJ RULING 164 2.8.4
POST-RULING 165 2.9 CASE 9: ASSOCIATION DES CENTRES DISTRIBUTEES EDOUARD
LECLERC AND OTHERS V. SARL 'AU BLE VERT' AND OTHERS CASE 229/83 165
2.9.1 BACKGROUND 165 2.9.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 165 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 165
2.9.4 POST-RULING 166 2.10 CASE 10: HENRI CULLET AND CHAMBRE SYNDICATE
DES REPARATEURS AUTOMOBILES ET DETAILLANTS DE PRODUITS PETROLIERS V.
CENTRE LECLERC A TOULOUSE AND CENTRE LECLERC A SAINT-ORENS-DE-GAMEVILLE
CASE 231/83 166 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 166 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 166
2.10.3 ECJ RULING 167 2.10.4 POST-RULING 167 2.11 CASE 11: BUREAU
NATIONAL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU COGNAC V. GUY CLAIR CASE 123/83 167
2.11.1 BACKGROUND 167 2.11.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 168 2.11.3 ECJ RULING
168 2.11.4 POST-RULING 168 2.12 CASE 12: SA SAINT-HERBLAIN DISTRIBUTION,
CENTRE DISTRIBUTEUR LECLERC AND OTHERS V. SYNDICAT DES LIBRAIRES DE
LOIRE - OCEAN CASE 299/83 169 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 169 2.12.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 169 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 169 2.12.4 POST-RULING 169 2.13 CASE 13:
PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE V. CLAUDE CHABAUD ET JEAN-LOUIS REMY CASE
79-80/84 170 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 170 XII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.13.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 170 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 170 2.13.4 POST-RULING 170
2.14 CASE 14: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE AND DIRECTION
INTERDEPARTEMENTALE DE LA CONCURRENCE ET DE LA CONSOMMATION V. JACQUES
BINET AND OTHERS CASE 149/84 171 2.14.1 BACKGROUND 171 2.14.2 QUESTION
FOR THE ECJ 171 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 171 2.14.4 POST-RULING 171 2.15 CASE
15: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE V. MARIE-HELENE FEREY, NEE HERICOTTE CASE
215/84 172 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 172 2.15.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 172 2.15.3
ECJ RULING 172 2.15.4 POST-RULING 173 2.16 CASE 16: PROCUREUR DE LA
REPUBLIQUE V. JEAN-PIERRE GONTIER CASE 201/84 173 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 173
2.16.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 173 2.16.3 ECJ RULING 173 2.16.4 POST-RULING
174 2.17 CASE 17: PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE V. CHRISTIAN GRATIOT CASE
11/84 174 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 174 2.17.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 174 2.17.3
ECJ RULING 175 2.17.4 POST-RULING 175 2.18 CASE 18: PROCUREUR DE LA
REPUBLIQUE V. MICHEL LECLERC CASE 34/84 175 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 175 2.18.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 175 2.18.3 ECJ RULING 176 2.18.4 POST-RULING 176
2.19 CASE 19: SA ETABLISSEMENTS PISZKO V. SA DAMMARIE DISTRIBUTION
'CENTRE LECLERC' ET SA CARREFOUR SUPERMARCHE JOINED CASES 114 AND 115/84
177 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 177 2.19.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 177 2.19.3 ECJ
RULING 177 2.19.4 POST-RULING 178 2.20 CASE 20: PROCUREUR DE LA
REPUBLIQUE ET DIRECTEUR DEPARTEMENTAL DE LA CONCURRENCE ET DE LA
CONSOMMATION V. J. CHIRON AND OTHERS JOINED CASES 271-274/84 AND 6-7/85,
6/7/85 178 2.20.1 BACKGROUND 178 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XIII 2.20.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 178 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 179 2.20.4 POST-RULING 179
2.21 CASE 21: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS V. LUCAS ASJES AND OTHERS, ANDREW
GRAY AND OTHERS, JACQUES MAILLOT AND OTHERS, LEO LUDWIG AND OTHERS
JOINED CASES 209-213/84 179 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 179 2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 179 2.21.3 ECJ RULING 180 2.21.4 POST-RULING 180 2.22 CASE 22:
VAG FRANCE SA V. ETABLISSEMENTS MAGNE SA CASE 10/86 180 2.22.1
BACKGROUND 180 2.22.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 181 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 181
2.22.4 POST-RULING 181 2.23 CASE 23: G. BASSET V. SOCIETE DES AUTEURS,
COMPOSITEURS ET EDITEURS DE MUSIQUE (SACEM) CASE 402/85 182 2.23.1
BACKGROUND 182 2.23.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 182 2.23.3 ECJ RULING 182
2.23.4 POST-RULING 183 2.24 CASE 24: MINISTERE PUBLIC V. REGIS LEFEVRE
CASE 188/86 183 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 183 2.24.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 183
2.24.3 ECJ RULING 183 2.24.4 POST-RULING 184 2.25 CASE 25: BUREAU
NATIONAL INTERPROFESSIONNEL DU COGNAC V. YVES AUBERT CASE 136/86 184
2.25.1 BACKGROUND 184 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 184 2.25.3 ECJ RULING
185 2.25.4 POST-RULING 185 2.26 CASE 26: CORINNE BODSON V. SA POMPES
FUNEBRES DES REGIONS LIBEREES CASE 30/87 185 2.26.1 BACKGROUND 185
2.26.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 186 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 186 2.26.4 POST-RULING
187 2.27 CASE 27: SYNDICAT DES LIBRAIRIES DE NORMANDIE V. L'AIGLE
DISTRIBUTION CASE 254/87 187 2.27.1 BACKGROUND 187 2.27.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 188 2.27.3 ECJ RULING 188 2.27.4 POST-RULING 188 XIV DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.28 CASE 28: SOCIETE ALSACIENNE ET LORRAINE DE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET D'ELECTRONIQUE (ALSATEL) V. SA NOVASAM CASE 247/86
188 2.28.1 BACKGROUND 188 2.28.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 189 2.28.3 ECJ
RULING 189 2.28.4 POST-RULING 189 2.29 CASE 29: LUCAZEAU E.A. V. SACEM
E.A. JOINED CASES C-L 10/88, 241/88 AND 242/88 190 2.29.1 BACKGROUND 190
2.29.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 190 2.29.3 ECJ RULING 190 2.29.4
POST-RULING 191 2.30 CASE 30: MINISTERE PUBLIC V. JEAN-LOUIS TOURNIER
CASE C-395/87 191 2.30.1 BACKGROUND 191 2.30.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 191
2.30.3 ECJ RULING 192 2.30.4 POST-RULING 193 2.31 CASE 31: CHRISTIAN
POUCET ASSURANCES GENERALES DE FRANCE ('AGF') V. CAISSE MUTUELLE
REGIONALE DU LANGUEDOC-ROUSSILLON ('CAMULRAC') AND DANIEL PISTRE V.
CAISSE AUTONOME NATIONALE DE COMPENSATION DE I' ASSURANCE VIEILLESSE DES
ARTISANS ('CANCAVA') JOINED CASES C-159/91 AND C-160/91 193 2.31.1
BACKGROUND 193 2.31.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 193 2.31.3 ECJ RULING 194
2.31.4 POST-RULING 194 2.32 CASE 32: SOCIETE CIVILE AGRICOLE DU CENTRE
D'INSEMINATION DE LA CRESPELLE V. COOPERATIVE D'ELEVAGE ET
D'INSEMINATION ARTIFWIELLE DU DEPARTEMENT DE LA MAYENNE CASE C-323/93
194 2.32.1 BACKGROUND 194 2.32.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 194 2.32.3 ECJ
RULING 195 2.32.4 POST-RULING 195 2.33 CASE 33: SOCIETE D'IMPORTATION
EDOUARD LECLERC-SIPLEC V. TF1 PUBLICITE SA AND M6 PUBLICITE SA CASE
C-412/93 195 2.33.1 BACKGROUND 195 2.33.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 196
2.33.3 ECJ RULING 196 2.33.4 POST-RULING 196 2.34 CASE 34: FFSA V.
MINISTERE DE I'AGRICULTURE ET DE LA PECHE CASE C-244/94 196 2.34.1
BACKGROUND 196 2.34.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 197 DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS XV 2.34.3 ECJ RULING 197 2.34.4 POST-RULING 197 2.35 CASE 35:
GRAND GARAGE ALBIGEOIS ET AUTRES V. GARAGE MASSOL SARL CASE C-226/94 197
2.35.1 BACKGROUND 197 2.35.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 198 2.35.3 ECJ RULING
198 2.35.4 POST-RULING 198 2.36 CASE 36: NISSAN FRANCE VS GARAGE SPORT
AUTO, STAR' TERRE SARL AND AQUEDUCS AUTOMOBILES SARL CAS E C-309/94 198
2.36.1 BACKGROUND 198 2.36.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 199 2.36.3 ECJ RULING
199 2.36.4 POST-RULING 199 2.37 CASE 37: SYNDICAT FRANGAIS DE I'EXPRESS
INTERNATIONAL (SFEI) AND OTHERS V. LA POSTE AND OTHERS CASE C-39/94 199
2.37.1 BACKGROUND 199 2.37.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 200 2.37.3 ECJ RULING
201 2.37.4 POST-RULING 201 2.38 CASE 38: FONTAINE V. AQUEDIUCS
AUTOMOBILE SARL CASE C-128/95 202 2.38.1 BACKGROUND 202 2.38.2 QUESTION
FOR THE ECJ 202 2.38.3 ECJ RULING 202 2.38.4 POST-RULING 203 2.39 CASE
39: JAVICO INTERNATIONAL - JAVICO AG V. YVES SAINT LAURENT PARFUMS SA
(YSLP) CASE C-306/96 203 2.39.1 BACKGROUND 203 2.39.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ
203 2.39.3 ECJ RULING 203 2.39.4 POST-RULING 204 2.40 CASE 40: CABOUR SA
ET NORD DISTRIBUTION AUTOMOBILE SA, SUPPORTED BY AUTOMOBILES PEUGEOT SA
ET AUTOMOBILES CITROEN SA V. ARNOR 'SOCO' SARL CASE C-230/96 204 2.40.1
BACKGROUND 204 2.40.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 205 2.40.3 ECJ RULING 205 2.40.4
POST-RULING 206 2.41 CASE 41: ECHIROLLES DISTRIBUTION SA V. ASSOCIATION
DU DAUPHINE E.A. CASE C-9/99 206 2.41.1 BACKGROUND 206 2.41.2 QUESTIONS
FOR ECJ 207 2.41.3 ECJ RULING 207 2.41.4 POST-RULING 207 XVI DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.42 CASE 42: FERRING SA V. AGENCE CENTRALE DES
ORGANISMES DE SECURITE SOCIALE (ACOSS) CASE C-53/00 207 2.42.1
BACKGROUND 207 2.42.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 208 2.42.3 ECJ RULING 208 2.42.4
POST-RULING 208 2.43 CASE 43: ROQUETTE FRERES SA V. DIRECTEUR GENERAL DE
LA CONCURRENCE, DE LA CONSOMMATION ET DE LA REPRESSION DESFRAUDES CASE
C-94/00 209 2.43.1 BACKGROUND 209 2.43.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 209 2.43.3
ECJ RULING 210 2.43.4 POST-RULING 211 2.44 CASE 44: MINISTRE DE
I'ECONOMIE, DES FINANCES ET DE VLNDUSTRIE VS GEMO SA CASE C-126/01 211
2.44.1 BACKGROUND 211 2.44.2 QUESTIONS FOR ECJ 212 2.44.3 ECJ RULING 212
2.44.4 POST-RULING 212 CHAPTER ITALY 5 IGOR TACCANI 1. INTRODUCTION 2.
ITALIAN CASES 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 CASE 1: 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 CASE 2:
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 CASE 3: COSTA V. ENEL CASE 6/64 BACKGROUND
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING SIRENA V. EDA A.O. CASE
40/70 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING CARMINE
CAPOLONGO V. AZIENDE AGRICOLE MAYA CASE 77/72 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4
CASE 4: 2.4.1 2.4.2 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING GIUSEPPE SACCHI CASE 155/73 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ
213 213 216 218 218 218 218 219 220 220 220 220 222 223 223 223 223 224
224 224 224 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XVII 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10
2.11 2.12 2.4.3 ECJ RULING 2.4.4 POST-RULING CASE 5: IGAV V. ENCC CASE
94/74 2.5.1 BACKGROUND 2.5.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.5.3 ECJ RULING 2.5.4
POST-RULING CASE 6: IANNELLI & VOLPI V. MERONI CASE 74/76 2.6.1
BACKGROUND 2.6.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.6.3 ECJ RULING 2.6.4 POST-RULING
CASE 7: VAN AYMEDE V. UCI CASE 90/76 2.7.1 BACKGROUND 2.7.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 2.7.3 ECJ RULING 2.7.4 POST-RULING CASE 8: AMMINISTRAZIONE
DELLE FINANZE DELLO STATO V. DENKAVIT CASE 61/79 2.8.1 BACKGROUND 2.8.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.8.3 ECJ RULING 2.8.4 POST-RULING CASE 9:
AMMINISTRAZIONE DELLE FINANZE DELLO STATO V. ARIETE SPA CASE 811/79
2.9.1 BACKGROUND 2.9.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 2.9.4
POST-RULING CASE 10: AMMINISTRAZIONE DELLE FINANZE DELLO STATO V. M1REC0
CASE 826/79 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.10.3 ECJ
RULING 2.10.4 POST-RULING CASE 11: AMMINISTRAZIONE DELLE FINANZE DELLO
STATO V. ESSEVI SPA JOINED CASES 142 AND 143/80 2.11.1 BACKGROUND 2.11.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.11.3 ECJ RULING 2.11.4 POST-RULING CASE 12:
SALONIA V. POIDOMANI AND GIGLIO CASE 126/80 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 2.12.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 225 226 227 227 227 227 228 228 228 228 229 229
229 229 230 231 232 232 232 232 233 233 233 233 234 234 235 235 235 235
236 236 236 236 237 237 237 237 237 238 XVIII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 2.12.4 POST-RULING
CASE 13: CICRA AND MAXICAR V. REGIE NAZIONALE DES USINES RENAULT CASE
53/87 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 2.13.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.13.3 ECJ RULING
2.13.4 POST-RULING CASE 14: DM PONT V. USL N.2 DI CARRARA CASE C-21/88
2.14.1 BACKGROUND 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 2.14.4
POST-RULING CASE 15: MERCI CONVENZIONAL PORTO DI GENOVA SPA V.
SIDERURGICA GABRIELLI CASE C-179/90 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 2.15.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 2.15.4 POST-RULING 2.15.4.1 COMMENT CASE
16: FONDERIA A. SPA V. CASSA CONGUAGLIO PER IL SETTORE ELECTRICO CASE
C-100/92 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 2.16.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.16.3 ECJ RULING
2.16.4 POST-RULING CASE 17: CORSICA FERRIES ITALIA SRI V. CORPO PILOTI
DEL PORTO DI GENOVA CASE C-18/93 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 2.17.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 2.17.3 ECJ RULING 2.17.4 POST-RULING CASE 18: CENTRO SERVIZI
SPEDIPORTO CASE C-96/94 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 2.18.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ
2.18.3 ECJ RULING 2.18.4 POST-RULING CASE 19: DIP SPA A.O. COMUNE DI
BASSANO GRAPPA JOINED CASES C-140-142/94 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 2.19.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.19.3 ECJ RULING 2.19.4 POST-RULING 239 240 240
240 241 241 242 242 242 243 243 244 244 244 245 245 247 249 250 250 250
251 251 251 251 252 253 254 254 254 254 255 257 257 257 257 258 259
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XIX 2.20 CASE 20: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST GIORGIO DOMINGO BANCHERO CASE C-387/93 259 2.20.1 BACKGROUND 259
2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 259 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 260 2.20.4
POST-RULING 262 2.21 CASE 21: DIEGO CALI & FIGLI SRI V. SERVIZI
ECOLOGICI PORTO DI GENOVA (SPEG) CASE C-343/95 262 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 262
2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 262 2.21.3 ECJ RULING 263 2.21.4
POST-RULING 264 2.22 CASE 22: SODEMARE SA A.O. V. REGIONE LOMBARDIA CASE
C-70/95 265 2.22.1 BACKGROUND 265 2.22.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 266
2.22.3 ECJ RULING 266 2.22.4 POST-RULING 267 2.23 CASE 23: JOB CENTRE II
CASE C-55/96 267 2.23.1 BACKGROUND 267 2.23.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 268
2.23.3 ECJ RULING 268 2.23.4 POST-RULING 269 2.24 CASE 24: SILVANO RASO
A.O. CASE C-163/96 270 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 270 2.24.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE
ECJ 270 2.24.3 ECJ RULING 271 2.24.4 POST-RULING 271 2.25 CASE 25:
VISCIDO AND OTHERS/ENTE POSTE ITALIANE JOINED CASES C-52-54/97 272
2.25.1 BACKGROUND 272 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 272 2.25.3 ECJ RULING
273 2.25.4 POST-RULING 273 2.26 CASE 26: CORSICA FERRIES FRANCE/GRUPPO
ANTICHI ORMEGGIATORI DEL PORTO DI GENOVA A. O. CAS E C-266/96 273 2.26.1
BACKGROUND 273 2.26.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 274 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 274
2.26.4 POST-RULING 276 2.27 CASE 27: AUTOTRASPORTI LIBRANDI CASE C-38/97
276 2.27.1 BACKGROUND 276 2.27.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 276 2.27.3 ECJ
RULING 278 2.27.4 POST-RULING 279 XX DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.28
CASE 28: ECOTRADE CASE C-200/97 280 2.28.1 BACKGROUND 280 2.28.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 281 2.28.3 ECJ RULING 282 2.28.4 POST-RULING 283
2.29 CASE 29: BAGNASCO JOINED CASES C-215-216/96 284 2.29.1 BACKGROUND
284 2.29.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 284 2.29.3 ECJ RULING 285 2.29.4
POST-RULING 287 2.30 CASE 30: RINALDO PIAGGIO CASE C-295/97 287 2.30.1
BACKGROUND 287 2.30.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 287 2.30.3 ECJ RULING 288
2.30.4 POST-RULING 289 2.31 CASE 31: CARRA AND OTHERS CASE C-258/98 289
2.31.1 BACKGROUND 289 2.31.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 289 2.31.3 ECJ RULING
290 2.31.4 POST-RULING 290 2.32 CASE 32: TNT TRACO SPA, POSTE ITALIANE
SPA CASE C-340/99 291 2.32.1 BACKGROUND 291 2.32.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ
291 2.32.3 ECJ RULING 292 2.32.4 POST-RULING 293 2.33 CASE 33: CONTE
CASE C-221/99 293 2.33.1 BACKGROUND 293 2.33.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 293
2.33.3 ECJ RULING 294 2.33.4 POST-RULING 295 2.34 CASE 34: CISAL DI
BATTISTELLO VENANZIO & C CASE C-218-00 295 2.34.1 BACKGROUND 295 2.34.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 296 2.34.3 ECJ RULING 296 2.34.4 POST-RULING 296
2.35 CASE 35: ARDUINO CASE C-35/99 297 2.35.1 BACKGROUND 297 2.35.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 297 2.35.3 ECJ RULING 297 2.35.4 POST-RULING 299
2.36 CASE 36: CONSORZIO INDUSTRIE FIAMMIFERI (CIF) CASE C-198/01 299
2.36.1 BACKGROUND 299 2.36.1.1 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK 299 2.36.1.2 THE AGCM
DECISION 299 2.36.1.3 THE MAIN PROCEEDINGS 300 DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS XXI 2.36.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 301 2.36.3 ECJ RULING 301
2.36.4 POST-RULING 304 2.37 CASE 37: ALTAIR CHIMICA CASE C-207/01 304
2.37.1 BACKGROUND 304 2.37.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 305 2.37.3 ECJ RULING
305 2.37.4 POST-RULING 306 2.38 CASE 38: ENIRISORSE CASES C-34-38/01 306
2.38.1 BACKGROUND 306 2.38.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 307 2.38.3 ECJ RULING
307 2.38.4 POST-RULING 309 CHAPTER 6 GERMANY 311 LISA LERNBORG 1.
INTRODUCTION 311 2. GERMAN CASES 314 2.1 CASE 1: WALT WILHELM, HANS
GOELZ, HANS ULRICH FINTELMANN, BADISCHE ANILIN-UND SODA-FABRIK AG,
FARBENFABRIK BAYER AG, FARBWERKE HOECHST AG, CASSELLA FARBWERKE MAINKUR
AG V. BUNDESKARTELLAMT CASE 14/68 316 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 316 2.1.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 316 2.1.3 ECJ RULING 317 2.1.4 POST-RULING 317 2.2
CASE 2: FRANZ VOELK V. ETABLISSEMENTS J. VERVAECKE (SOCIETE DE PERSONNES
A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE) CASE 5/69 318 2.2.1 BACKGROUND 318 2.2.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 318 2.2.3 ECJ RULING 318 2.2.4 POST-RULING 319 2.3
CASE 3: BRAUEREI A. BILGER SOEHNE GMBH V. HEINRICH JEHLE CASE 43/69 319
2.3.1 BACKGROUND 319 2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 320 2.3.3 ECJ RULING
320 2.3.4 POST-RULING 321 2.4 CASE 4: DEUTSCHE GRAMMOPHON GESELLSCHAFT
MBH V. METRO- SB-GROSSMAERKTE GMBH AND COMPANY KG, REPRESENTED BY THE
COMPANY METRO-SB-GROSSMAERKTE GMBH CASE 78/70 322 2.4.1 BACKGROUND 322
2.4.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 322 XXII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4.3
ECJ RULING 322 2.4.4 POST-RULING 323 2.5 CASE 5: PARFUMS MARCEL ROCHAS
VERTRIEBS-GMBH V. HELMUT BITSCH CASE 1/70 324 2.5.1 BACKGROUND 324 2.5.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 324 2.5.3 ECJ RULING 325 2.5.4 POST-RULING 325 2.6
CASE 6: EMI RECORDS LIMITED V. CBS SCHALLPLATTEN GMBH CASE 96/75 325
2.6.1 BACKGROUND 325 2.6.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 326 2.6.3 ECJ RULING 326
2.6.4 POST-RULING 327 2.7 CASE 7: HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE & CO. AG AND
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, GRENZACH-WYHLEN V. CENTRAFARM
VERTRIEBSGESELLSCHAFT PHARMAZEUTISCHER ERZEUGNISSE MBH CASE 102/77 327
2.7.1 BACKGROUND 327 2.7.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 327 2.7.3 ECJ RULING
328 2.7.4 POST-RULING 328 2.8 CASE 8: GERHARD ZUECHNER, ROSENHEIM V.
BAYERSICHE VEREINSBANK AG CASE 172/80 329 2.8.1 BACKGROUND 329 2.8.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 329 2.8.3 ECJ RULING 329 2.8.4 POST-RULING 330 2.9
CASE 9: SOCIETE DE VENTE DE CIMENTS ET BETONS DE L'EST SA V. KERPEN &
KERPEN GMBH & CO. KG CASE 319/82 330 2.9.1 BACKGROUND 330 2.9.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 330 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 331 2.9.4 POST-RULING 331
2.10 CASE 10: HYDROTHERM GERATEBAU GMBH V. COMPACT DEL DOTT. ING. MARIO
ANDREOLI & C. SAS CASE 170/83 332 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 332 2.10.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 332 2.10.3 ECJ RULING 333 2.10.4 POST-RULING 334 2.11 CASE
11: PRONUPTIA DE PARIS GMBH V. PRONUPTIA DE PARIS IRMGARD SCHILLGALIS
CASE 161/84 335 2.11.1 BACKGROUND 335 2.11.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 335
2.11.3 ECJ RULING 336 2.11.4 POST-RULING 336 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
XXIII 2.12 CASE 12: BAYER AG AND MACHINENFABRIK HENNECKE GMBH V. HEINZ
SUELLHOEFER CASE 65/86 337 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 337 2.12.2 QUESTION FOR THE
ECJ 338 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 338 2.12.4 POST-RULING 339 2.13 CASE 13: AHMED
SAEED FLUGREISEN AND SILVER LINE REISEBUERO GMBH V. ZENTRALE ZUR
BEKAEMPFUNG UNLAUTEREN WETTBEWERBS E.V. (REGISTERED ASSOCIATION FOR THE
CAMPAIGN AGAINST UNFAIR COMPETITION) CASE 66/86 340 2.13.1 BACKGROUND
340 2.13.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 340 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 341 2.13.4
POST-RULING 343 2.14 CASE 14: STERGIOS DELIMITIS V. HENNINGER BRAEU AG
CASE 234/89 344 2.14.1 BACKGROUND 344 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 345
2.14.3 ECJ RULING 346 2.14.4 POST-RULING 348 2.15 CASE 15: KLAUS HOEFNER
AND FRITZ ELSER V. MACROTRON GMBH CASE C-41/90 348 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 348
2.15.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 348 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 349 2.15.4 POST-RULING
349 2.16 CASE 16: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY V. WOLFW. MENG CASE C-2/91
350 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 350 2.16.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 350 2.16.3 ECJ
RULING 350 2.16.4 POST-RULING 351 2.17 CASE 17: BUNDESANSTALT FUER DEN
GUETETFERNVERKEHR V. GEBRUEDER REIFF GMBH & CO. KG CASE C-185/91 351
2.17.1 BACKGROUND 351 2.17.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 352 2.17.3 ECJ RULING
352 2.17.4 POST-RULING 352 2.18 CASE 18: METRO SB-GROSSMAERKTE GMBH &
CO. KG V. CARTIER SA CASE C-376/92 353 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 353 2.18.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 353 2.18.3 ECJ RULING 353 2.18.4 POST-RULING 354
XXIV DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.19 CASE 19: FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF
GERMANY V. DELTA SCHIFFAHRTS-UND SPEDITIONSGESELLSCHAFT MBH CASE C-15/93
355 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 355 2.19.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 355 2.19.3 ECJ
RULING 355 2.19.4 POST-RULING 356 2.20 CASE 20: BAYERISCHE MOTORENWERKE
AG V. ALD AUTO-LEASING D GMBH CASE C-70/93 356 2.20.1 BACKGROUND 356
2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 357 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 357 2.20.4
POST-RULING 358 2.21 CASE 21: BUNDESKARTELLAMT V. VOLKSWAGEN AG, VAG
LEASING GMBH, SUPPORTED BY VAG-HAENDLERBEIRAT EV, INTERVENER CASE
C-266/93 359 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 359 2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 359
2.21.3 ECJ RULING 360 2.21.4 POST-RULING 360 2.22 CASE 22:
VAG-HDNDLERBEIRAT EV V. SYD-CONSULT CASE C-41/96 361 2.22.1 BACKGROUND
361 2.22.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 361 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 362 2.22.4
POST-RULING 362 2.23 CASE 23: DEUTSCHE POST AG V. GESELLSCHAFT FUR
ZAHLUNGSSYSTEME MBH (GZS), (C-147/97) AND CITICORP KARTENSERVICE GMBH
(C-148/97) CASES C-147 & 148/97 363 2.23.1 BACKGROUND 363 2.23.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 363 2.23.3 ECJ RULING 364 2.23.4 POST-RULING 365
2.24 CASE 24: G PREUSSENELEKTRA AG V. SCHLESWAG AG IN THE PRESENCE OF
WINDPARK REUFIENKOGE III GMBH AND LAND SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN CASE C-379/98
366 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 366 2.24.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 366 2.24.3 ECJ
RULING 367 2.24.4 POST-RULING 368 2.25 CASE 25: AMBULANZ GLOECKNER V.
LANDKREIS SUEDWESTPFALZ; JOINED PARTIES: ARBEITER-SAMARITER-BUND
LANDESVERBAND RHEINLAND-PFALZ EV, DEUTSCHES ROTES KREUTZ LANDESVERBAND
RHEINLAND-PFALZ EV AND VERTRETER DES OEFFENTLICHEN INTERESSES CASE
C-475/99 368 2.25.1 BACKGROUND 368 2.25.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 368
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXV 2.25.3 ECJ RULING 368 2.25.4 POST-RULING
369 2.26 CASE 26: 7. AOK BUNDESVERBAND, 2. BUNDESVERBAND DER
BETRIEBSKASSEN (BKK), 3. BUNDESVERBAND DER INNUNGSKRANKENKASSEN, 4.
BUNDESVERBAND DER LANDWIRTSCHAFTLICHEN KRANKENKASSEN, 5. VERBAND DER
ANGESTELLTENKRANKENKASSEN EV, 6. VERBAND DER ARBEITER-ERSATZKASSEN, 7.
BUNDESKNAPPSCHAFT, 8. SEE-KRANKENKASSE V. ICHTHYOL-GESELLSCHAFT CORDES,
HERMANI & CO. (C-264/01); MUNDIPHARMA GMBH (C-306/01); GODECKE GMBH (C-3
54/01); INTERSAN, INSTITUT FUR PHARMAZEUTISCHE UND KLINISCHE FORSCHUNG
GMBH (C-355/01) CASES C-264/01, C-306/01, C-354/01 & C-355/01 370 2.26.1
BACKGROUND 370 2.26.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 371 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 373
2.26.4 POST-RULING 374 2.27 CASE 27: IMS HEALTH GMBH & CO. OHG V. NDC
HEALTH GMBH & CO. KG CASE C-418/01 374 2.27.1 BACKGROUND 374 2.27.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 375 2.27.3 ECJ RULING 375 2.27.4 POST-RULING 376
CHAPTER 7 BELGIUM 377 MARIANNE DONY AND CAROLE MOAL-NUYTS 1.
INTRODUCTION 377 1.1 MULTIPLICITY OF BELGIAN REFERENCES TO THE ECJ 378
1.1.1 FREQUENCY OF REFERENCES 378 1.1.2 EXPERIENCE OF SIMILAR REFERENCE
PROCEDURES 380 1.1.3 OTHER EXPLANATORY FACTORS 381 1.2 DIVERSITY OF
REFERRING COURTS 382 1.2.1 VARIOUS IDENTITIES OF THE REFERRING COURTS
382 1.2.2 LEVEL OF COURT REFERRING 383 1.3 FORM, RELEVANCE AND FOLLOW UP
TO PRELIMINARY QUESTIONS 385 1.3.1 FORM 385 1.3.2 RELEVANCE 386 1.3.2.1
FOLLOW UP 386 2. BELGIAN CASES 387 2.1 CASE 1: SA BRASSERIE DE HAECHT V.
CONSORTS WILKIN-JANSSENS CASE 23/67 388 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 388 XXVI
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4
CASE QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 2: SA PORTELANGE V. SA
SMITH CORONA MARCHANT INTERNATIONAL ET AL. CASE 10/69 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3
2.2.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 3: SA
BRASSERIE DE HAECHT V. CONSORTS WILKIN-JANSSENS CASE 48/72 2.3.1 2.3.2
2.3.3 2.3.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING
4: BELGISCHE RADIO EN TELEVISIE V. SV SABAM AND NV FONIOR (BRT-I AND
BRT-II) CASE 127/73 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 5: PROCUREUR DU ROI V. BENOIT AND
GUSTAVE DASSONVILLE CASE 8/74 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 CASE CLERQ 2.6.1
2.6.2 2.6.3 2.6.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING 6: ALEXIS DE NORRE AND HIS WIFE MARTINE, NEE DE \ V. NV
BROUWERIJ CONCORDIA CASE 47/76 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ
RULING POST-RULING 7: SA G.B.-INNO-B.M. V. ASSOCIATION DES DETAILLANTS
EN TABAC (ATAB) CASE 13/77 2.7.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4 CASE BACKGROUND
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 8: ETABLISSEMENTS A. DE
BLOOS SPRL V. SOCIETE EN COMMANDITE PAR ACTIONS BOUYER CASE 59/77 2.8.1
2.8.2 2.8.3 2.8.4 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING 388 389 389 390 390 390 390 391 391 391 391 392 393 393 393
394 395 396 396 396 397 397 398 398 398 398 399 399 400 400 400 401 402
402 402 403 403 404 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXVII 2.9 CASE 9: NV
L'OREAL AND SA L'OREAL V. PVBA *DE NIEUWE AMCK' CASE 31/80 404 2.9.1
BACKGROUND 404 2.9.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 404 2.9.3 ECJ RULING 405
2.9.4 POST-RULING 407 2.10 CASE 10: CODITEL SA, COMPAGNIE GENERATE POUR
LA DIFFUSION DE LA TELEVISION, ET AL. V. CINE-VOG FINIS SA ET AL. CASE
262/81 407 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 407 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 408 2.10.3
ECJ RULING 409 2.10.4 POST-RULING 410 2.11 CASE 11: SA BINON & CIE V. SA
AGENCE ET MESSAGERIES DE LA PRESSE CASE 243/83 410 2.11.1 BACKGROUND 410
2.11.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 410 2.11.3 ECJ RULING 411 2.11.4
POST-RULING 413 2.12 CASE 12: CENTRE BEIGE D'ETUDES DE MARCHE *
TELEMARKETING (CBEM) V. SA COMPAGNIE LUXEMBOURGEOISE DE TELEDIFFUSION
(CLT) AND INFORMATION PUBLICITE BENELUX (IPB) CASE 311/84 413 2.12.1
BACKGROUND 413 2.12.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 414 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 414
2.12.4 POST-RULING 415 2.13 CASE 13: ETA FABRIQUES D'EBAUCHES V. SA DK
INVESTMENT ET AL. CASE 31/85 415 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 415 2.13.2 QUESTION
FOR THE ECJ 415 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 416 2.13.4 POST-RULING 417 2.14 CASE
14: ASBL VEREINIGING VAN VLAAMSE REISBUREAUS V. ASBL SOCIALE DIENST VAN
DE PLAATSELIJKE EN GEWESTELIJKE OVERHEIDSDIENSTEN CASE 311/85 417 2.14.1
BACKGROUND 417 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 417 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 418
2.14.4 POST-RULING 418 2.15 CASE 15: SPRL LOUIS ERAUW-JACQUERY V. LA
HESBIGNONNE SC CASE 27/87 419 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 419 2.15.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 419 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 419 2.15.4 POST-RULING 420 XXVIII DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 CASE 16: PASCAL VAN
EYCKE V. ASPA NV CASE 267/86 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 2.16.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE
ECJ 2.16.3 ECJ RULING 2.16.4 POST-RULING CASE 17: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST ANDRE MARCHANDISE, JEAN-MARIE CHAPUIS AND SA TRAFITEX CASE
267/86 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 2.17.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.17.3 ECJ RULING
2.17.4 POST-RULING CASE 18: REGIE DES TELEGRAPHES ET DES TELEPHONES V.
GB-INNO-BM SA CASE 18/88 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 2.18.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ
2.18.3 ECJ RULING 2.18.4 POST-RULING CASE 19: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST PAUL CORBEAU CASE C-320/91 2.19.1 BACKGROUND 2.19.2 QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ 2.19.3 ECJ RULING 2.19.4 POST-RULING CASE 20: PROCUREUR DU
ROI V. JEAN-MARIE LAGAUCHE ET AL. JOINED CASES C-46/90 AND C-93/91
2.20.1 BACKGROUND 2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 2.20.4
POST-RULING CASE 21: SAT FLUGGESELLSCHAFT MBH V. EUROCONTROL CASE
C-364/92 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 2.21.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 2.21.3 ECJ RULING
2.21.4 POST-RULING CASE 22: NAMUR-LES ASSURANCES DU CREDIT SA V. OFFICE
NATIONAL DU DUCROIRE AND THE BELGIAN STATE CASE C-44/93 2.22.1
BACKGROUND 2.22.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 2.22.4
POST-RULING 420 420 420 421 422 422 422 422 422 423 423 423 423 424 425
425 425 425 426 426 426 426 427 428 429 430 430 430 430 431 431 431 432
432 433 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXIX 2.23 CASE 23: UNION ROYALE BEIGE
DES SOCIETES DE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION ASBL V. JEAN-MARC BOSNIAN, ROYAL
CLUB LIEGEOIS SA V. JEAN-MARC BOSNIAN ET AL. AND UNION DES ASSOCIATIONS
EUROPEENNES DE FOOTBALL (UEFA) V. JEAN-MARC BOSNIAN CASE C-415/93 434
2.23.1 BACKGROUND 434 2.23.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 434 2.23.3 ECJ RULING
434 2.23.4 POST-RULING 435 2.24 CASE 24: DEMENAGEMENTS - MANUTENTION
TRANSPORTS SA (DMT) CASE C-256/97 436 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 436 2.24.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 436 2.24.3 ECJ RULING 437 2.24.4 POST-RULING 438
2.25 CASE 25: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JEAN CLAUDE BECU, ANNIE
VERWEIRE, SMEG NV AND ADIA INTERIM NV CASE C-22/98 438 2.25.1 BACKGROUND
438 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 438 2.25.3 ECJ RULING 439 2.25.4
POST-RULING 440 2.26 CASE 26: BELGISCHE STAAT AND EUGENE VAN CALSTER,
FELIX CLEEREN (C-261/01) AND BETWEEN BELGISCHE STAAT AND OPENBAAR
SLACHTHUIS NV (C-262/01) JOINED CASES C-261-262/01 440 2.26.1 BACKGROUND
440 2.26.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 440 2.26.3 ECJ RULING 441 2.26.4
POST-RULING 442 " CHAPTER 8 THE NETHERLANDS 443 NARIN TEZCAN, JEROEN
BOOT AND PIET JAN SLOT 1. INTRODUCTION 443 2. THE NETHERLANDS CASES 446
2.1 CASE 1: KLEDINGVERKOOPBEDRIJF DE GEUS EN UITDENBOGERD V. ROBERT
BOSCH GMBH AND MAATSCHAPPIJ TOT VOORTZETTING VAN DE ZAKEN DER FIRMA
WILLEM VAN RIJN CASE 13/61 447 2.1.1 BACKGROUND 447 2.1.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 448 2.1.3 ERJ RULING 448 2.1.4 POST-RULING 449 XXX DETAILED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.2 CASE 2: PARKE, DAVIS AND CO. V. PROBEL, REESE, 2.3
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 BIENTEMA-INTERPHARM AND CENTRAFARM CASE 24/67
2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 CASE DRUG 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 CASE
BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 3: CENTRAFARM BV
ET ADRIAAN DE PEIJPER V. STERLING INC. CASE 15/74 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS
FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 4: CENTRAFARM BV ET ADRIAAN DE
PEIJPER V. WINTHROP BV CASE 16/74 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 CASE
BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 5: VAN VLIET
KWASTEN - EN LADDERFABRIEK NV V. FRATELLI DALLE CRODE CASE 25/75 2.5.1
2.5.2 2.5.3 2.5.4 CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING 6: VEREENIGING TER BEVORDERING VAN DE BELANGEN DES
BOEKHANDELS ET AL. V. ELDI RECORDS BV CASE 106/79 2.6.1 2.6.2 2.6.3
2.6.4 CASE ETOS 2.1.1 2.7.2 2.7.3 2.7.4 CASE 2.8.1 2.8.2 2.8.3 2.8.4
CASE BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 7: SA
LANCOME AND COSPARFRANCE NEDERLAND BV V. BV AND ALBERT HEYN SUPERMAN BV
CASE 99/79 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 8:
KEURKOOP BV V. NANCY KEAN GIFTS BV CASE 144/81 BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING 9: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JAN VAN
DE HAAR AND KAVEKA DE MEERN BV JOINED CASES 177 AND 178/82 2.9.1 2.9.2
BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 449 449 449 450 450 451 451 451 451 452
452 452 453 453 453 453 453 454 454 455 455 455 456 457 457 458 458 458
459 460 461 461 461 462 463 463 463 464 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXXI
2.9.3 ECJ RULING 464 2.9.4 POST-RULING 465 2.10 CASE 10: OTTO BV V.
POSTBANK NV CASE C-60/92 465 2.10.1 BACKGROUND 465 2.10.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 466 2.10.3 ECJ RULING 466 2.10.4 POST-RULING 467 2.11 CRIMINAL
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST OHRA SCHADEVERZEKERINGEN NV C-245/91 467 2.11.1
BACKGROUND 467 2.11.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 468 2.11.3 ECJ RULING 468
2.11.4 POST-RULING 469 2.12 CASE 12: MUNICIPALITY OF ALMELO ET AL. V. NV
ENERGIEBEDRIJF IJSSELMIJ CASE C-393/92 469 2.12.1 BACKGROUND 469 2.12.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 470 2.12.3 ECJ RULING 470 2.12.4 POST-RULING 472
2.13 CASE 13: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST TANKSTATION 'T HEUKSKE VOF
AND J. B. E. BOERMANS C-401/92 AND C-402/92 472 2.13.1 BACKGROUND 472
2.13.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 473 2.13.3 ECJ RULING 473 2.13.4 POST-RULING
474 2.14 CASE 14: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JOHANNES GERRIT CORNELLS
VAN SCHAIK CASE C-55/93 474 2.14.1 BACKGROUND 474 2.14.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 474 2.14.3 ECJ RULING 475 2.14.4 POST-RULING 475 2.15 CASE 15:
DIJKSTRA ET AL. V. FRIESLAND (FRICO DOMO) COOPERATIE ET AL. JOINED CASES
C-319/93, C-40/94 AND C-224/94 475 2.15.1 BACKGROUND 475 2.15.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 476 2.15.3 ECJ RULING 477 2.15.4 POST-RULING 478
2.16 CASE 16: H. G. OUDE LUTTIKHUIS ET AL. V. VERENIGDE COOPERATIEVE
MELKINDUSTRIE COBERCO BA CASE C-399/93 479 2.16.1 BACKGROUND 479 2.16.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 479 2.16.3 ECJ RULING 480 2.16.4 POST-RULING 481
XXXII DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.17 CASE 17: KONINKLIJKE VEREENIGING
TER BEVORDERING VAN DE BELANGEN DES BOEKHANDELS V. FREE RECORD SHOP BV
AND FREE RECORD SHOP HOLDING NV CASE C-39/96 481 2.17.1 BACKGROUND 481
2.17.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 482 2.17.3 ECJ RULING 482 2.17.4
POST-RULING 483 2.18 CASE 18: CHEMISCHE AFVALSTOFFEN DUSSELDORP BV ET
AL. V. MINISTER VAN VOLKHUISVESTING, RUIMTELIJKE ORDENING EN
MILIEUBEHEER CASE C-203/96 483 2.18.1 BACKGROUND 483 2.18.2 QUESTION FOR
THE ECJ 484 2.18.3 ECJ RULING 484 2.18.4 POST-RULING 485 2.19 CASE 19:
ECO SWISS CHINA TIME LTD V. BENETTON INTERNATIONAL NV CASE C-126/97 485
2.19.1 BACKGROUND 485 2.19.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 486 2.19.3 ECJ RULING
487 2.19.4 POST-RULING 488 2.20 CASE 20: ALBANY INTERNATIONAL BV V.
STICHTING BEDRIJFSPENSIOENFONDS TEXTIELINDUSTRIE CASE C-67/96 488 2.20.1
BACKGROUND 488 2.20.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 489 2.20.3 ECJ RULING 490
2.20.4 POST-RULING 492 2.21 CASE 21: BRENTJENS' HANDELSONDERNEMING BV V.
STICHTING BEDRIJFSPENSIOENFONDS VOOR DE HANDEL IN BOUWMATERIALEN CASE
C-115/97 TO C-117/97 493 2.21.1 BACKGROUND 493 2.21.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE
ECJ 493 2.21.3 ECJ RULING 494 2.21.4 POST-RULING 495 2.22 CASE 22:
MAATSCHAPPIJ DRIJVENDE BOKKEN BV V. STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS VOOR DE
VERVOER-EN HAVENBEDRIJVEN CASE C-219/97 495 2.22.1 BACKGROUND 495 2.22.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 496 2.22.3 ECJ RULING 497 2.22.4 POST-RULING 498
2.23 CASE 23: PAVEL PAVLOV ET AL. V. STICHTING PENSIOENFONDS MEDISCHE
SPECIALISTEN JOINED CASES C-180/98 TO C-184/98 498 2.23.1 BACKGROUND 498
2.23.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 500 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXXIII
2.23.3 ECJ RULING 500 2.23.4 POST-RULING 502 2.24 CASE 24: HENDRIK VAN
DER WOUDE V. STICHTING BEATRIXOORD CASE 222/98 502 2.24.1 BACKGROUND 502
2.24.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 503 2.24.3 ECJ RULING 503 2.24.4 POST-RULING
504 2.25 CASE 25: J.C.J. WOUTERS, J.W. SAVELBERGH, PRICE WATERHOUSE
BELASTINGADVISEURS BV V. ALGEMENE RAAD VAN DE NEDERLANDSE ORDE VAN
ADVOCATEN CASE C-309/99 504 2.25.1 BACKGROUND 504 2.25.2 QUESTIONS FOR
THE ECJ 505 2.25.3 ECJ RULING 507 2.25.4 POST-RULING 509 CHAPTER 9
COUNTRIES WITH 3-5 RULINGS: DENMARK, PORTUGAL AND THE UNITED KINGDOM 511
ULLA NEERGAARD, LEONOR ROSSI AND SOFIA GERALDES, AND BARRY RODGER 1.
DENMARK 511 1.1 INTRODUCTION 511 1.2 DANISH CASES 515 1.2.1 CASE 1: EMI
RECORDS LIMITED V. CBS GRAMMOFON A/S CASE 86/75 515 1.2.1.1 BACKGROUND
515 1.2.1.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 516 1.2.1.3 ECJ RULING 516 1.2.1.4
POST-RULING 517 1.2.2 CASE 2: KAI OTTUNG V. KLEE &WWEILBACH A/S AND
THOMAS SCHMIDT A/S CASE 320/87 517 1.2.2.1 BACKGROUND 517 1.2.2.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 518 1.2.2.3 ECJ RULING 518 1.2.2.4 POST-RULING 519
1.2.3 CASE 3: GOETTRUP-KLIM GROVVAREFORENING ET AL. V. DANSK LANDBRUGS
GROVVARESELSKAB AMBA (DLG) CASE C-250/92 519 1.2.3.1 BACKGROUND 519
1.2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 520 1.2.3.3 ECJ RULING 520 1.2.3.4
POST-RULING 521 1.2.4 CASE 4: GT-LINK A/S V. DE DANSKE STATSBANER (DSB)
CASE C- 242/95 522 XXXIV DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.2.4.1 BACKGROUND
522 1.2.4.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 522 1.2.4.3 ECJ RULING 523 1.2.4.4
POST-RULING 524 1.2.5 CASE 5: ENTREPREN0RFORENINGENS
AJFALDS/MILJ0SEKTION (FFAD), ACTING FOR SYDHAVNENS STEN & GRUS APS V.
K0BENHAVNS KOMMUNE CASE C-209/98 525 1.2.5.1 BACKGROUND 525 1.2.5.2
QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 526 1.2.5.3 ECJ RULING 526 1.2.5.4 POST-RULING 528
2. PORTUGAL 528 2.1 INTRODUCTION 528 2.1.1 RELEVANT FACTORS 530 2.1.1.1
POLITICAL FACTORS 530 2.1.1.2 INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS 531 2.1.1.3 OUTLOOK
AND FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS 532 2.2 PORTUGUESE CASES 532 2.2.1 CASE 1:
BATISTA MORAIS V. PORTUGUESE REPUBLIC CASE C-60/91 532 2.2.1.1
BACKGROUND 532 2.2.1.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 533 2.2.1.3 ECJ RULING 533
2.2.1.4 POST-RULING 534 2.2.2 CASE 2: PETROGAL SA V. CORREIA SIMOES &
CORREIA, SOUSA & CRISOSTOMO, LDA. CASE C-39/92 534 2.2.2.1 BACKGROUND
534 2.2.2.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 535 2.2.2.3 ECJ RULING 535 2.2.2.4
POST-RULING 536 2.2.3 CASE 3: FLIGHTLINE CASE C-181/00 536 2.2.3.1
BACKGROUND 536 2.2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 537 2.2.3.3 ECJ RULING 538
2.2.3.4 POST RULING 538 3. UNITED KINGDOM 539 3.1 INTRODUCTION 539 3.2
UK CASES 540 3.2.1 CASE 1: EMI RECORDS LTD V. CBS UNITED KINGDOM LTD
CASE 51/75 541 3.2.1.1 BACKGROUND 541 3.2.1.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 542
3.2.1.3 ECJ RULING 542 3.2.1.4 POST-RULING 543 DETAILED TABLE OF
CONTENTS XXXV 3.2.2 CASE 2: AB VOLVO V. ERIK VENG (UK) LIMITED 3.2.3
3.2.4 3.2.5 CASE 238/87 3.2.2.1 BACKGROUND 3.2.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ
3.2.2.3 ECJ RULING 3.2.2.4 POST-RULING CASE 3: COURAGE LTD V. CREHAN
(ALSO KNOWN AS CREHAN V. COURAGE LTD) CASE C-453/99 3.2.3.1 BACKGROUND
3.2.3.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.2.3.3 ECJ RULING 3.2.3.4 POST-RULING
CASE 4: R V. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION EX PARTE MILK MARQUE LTD CASE
C-137/00 3.2.4.1 BACKGROUND 3.2.4.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.2.4.3 ECJ
RULING 3.2.4.4 POST-RULING CASE 5: G/L INSURANCE LTD ET AL. V.
COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE CASE C-308/01 3.2.5.1 BACKGROUND
3.2.5.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.2.5.3 C/ FLW/MG 3.2.5.4 POST-RULING 543
543 543 544 544 545 545 546 546 549 552 552 552 553 555 555 555 555 556
557 CHAPTER 10 COUNTRIES WITH 1-2 RULINGS: AUSTRIA, FINLAND, GREECE,
IRELAND, LUXEMBOURG AND SPAIN 559 ROBERT SCHMIDBAUER, ANTTI AINE,
ASSIMAKIS KOMNINOS, HARA NIKOLOPOULOU, DERMOT CAHILL, ELAINE FAHEY,
MARIANNE DONY, CAROLE MOAL-NUYTS, TERESA RODRIGUEZ DE LAS HERAS BALLELL
AND MANUEL ALBA FERNANDEZ 1. AUSTRIA 559 1.1 INTRODUCTION 559 1.1.1
RELEVANT FACTORS 560 1.1.1.1 POLITICAL FACTORS 561 1.1.1.2 INSTITUTIONAL
FACTORS 562 1.1.2 OUTLOOK AND FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS 562 1.2 CASE 1:
BRONNER V. MEDIAPRINT CASE C-7/97 563 1.2.1 BACKGROUND 563 1.2.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 563 1.2.3 ECJ RULING 564 1.2.4 POST-RULING 565
XXXVI DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.3 CASE 2: ADRIA-WIEN PIPELINE AND
WIETERSDORFER & PEGGAUER CASE C-143/99 1.3.1 1.3.2 1.3.3 1.3.4 2.
FINLAND 2.1 2.2 GENERA] BACKGROUND QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULING I NESTE MARKKINOINTI V. YOTUULI YM. CASE C-214/99 2.2.1
2.2.2 2.2.3 2.2.4 3. GREECE 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE
ECJ ECJ RULING POST-RULING INTRODUCTION DISAPPOINTMENT 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3
POLITICAL FACTORS INSTITUTIONAL/SOCIOLOGICAL FACTORS FACTORS RELEVANT TO
COMPETITION LAW ENFORCEMENT IN GREECE THE MEAGRE RECORD: ASTERIS AND ERT
3.3.1 3.3.2 HOPE 4. IRELAND 4.1 4.2 CASE 1: ASTERIS AE ET AL. V.
HELLENIC REPUBLIC AND EEC JOINED CASES C-106 TO 120/87 3.3.1.1
BACKGROUND 3.3.1.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.3.1.3 ECJ RULING 3.3.1.4
POST-RULING CASE 2: ELLINIKI RADIOPHONIA TILEORASI AE AND PANELLINIA
OMOSPONDIA SYLLOGON PROSSOPIKOU V. DIMOTIKI ETARIA PLIROFORISSIS AND
SOTIRIOS KOUVELAS AND NICOLAOS AVDELLAS ET AL. CASE C-260/89 3.3.2.1
BACKGROUND 3.3.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 3.3.2.3 ECJ RULING 3.3.2.4
POST-RULING INTRODUCTION 4.1.1 4.1.2 RATE OF REFERENCES AREAS OF
LAW/COURTS INVOLVED MASTERFOODS LTD V. HB ICE CREAM LTD CASE C-344/98
4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 BACKGROUND QUESTION FOR THE ECJ ECJ RULING
POST-RULINE 565 565 566 566 568 569 569 569 569 570 570 571 572 572 572
572 573 574 575 576 576 576 577 578 578 578 579 580 580 580 583 583 583
586 587 587 588 588 589 DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS XXXVII 5. LUXEMBOURG
590 5.1 INTRODUCTION 590 5.2 MINISTERE PUBLIC LUXEMBOURGEOIS V.
MADELEINE MIDLER, VEUVE J.P. HEIN ET AL. CASE C-10/71 591 5.2.1
BACKGROUND 591 5.2.2 QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 591 5.2.3 ECJ RULING 591
5.2.4 POST-RULING 592 6. SPAIN 593 6.1 INTRODUCTION 593 6.1.1 RATE OF
REFERENCES 593 6.1.2 AREAS OF LAW/COURTS INVOLVED 594 6.2 CASE 1:
DIRECTION GENERAL DE DEFENSA DE LA COMPETENCIA V. ASOCIACION ESPANOLA DE
BANCA PRIVADA ET AL., CASE 67/91 595 6.2.1 BACKGROUND 595 6.2.2
QUESTIONS FOR THE ECJ 595 6.2.3 ECJ RULING 596 6.2.4 POST-RULING 598 6.3
CASE 2: ESSO ESPANOLA S.A. V. COMUNIDAD AUTONOMA DE CANARIAS CASE 134/94
598 6.3.1 BACKGROUND 598 6.3.2 QUESTION FOR THE ECJ 598 6.3.3 ECJ RULING
599 6.3.4 POST-RULING 599 INDEX 601 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Rodger, Barry J. |
| author_facet | Rodger, Barry J. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Rodger, Barry J. |
| author_variant | b j r bj bjr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023092673 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJE6456 |
| callnumber-raw | KJE6456 |
| callnumber-search | KJE6456 |
| callnumber-sort | KJE 46456 |
| classification_rvk | PS 3760 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)216928909 (DE-599)BVBBV023092673 |
| dewey-full | 343.240721 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 343 - Military, tax, trade & industrial law |
| dewey-raw | 343.240721 |
| dewey-search | 343.240721 |
| dewey-sort | 3343.240721 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023092673</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100202</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080122s2008 xx d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041126054</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-411-2605-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9041126058</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-2605-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)216928909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023092673</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE6456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">343.240721</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3760</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139788:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rodger, Barry J.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Article 234 and competition law</subfield><subfield code="b">an analysis</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by by Barry J. Rodger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen aan den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law International</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LXVI, 610 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International competition law series</subfield><subfield code="v">33</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Advisory opinions</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Restraint of trade</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Restraint of trade</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Restraint of trade</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Restraint of trade</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121924-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121924-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International competition law series</subfield><subfield code="v">33</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV014209489</subfield><subfield code="9">33</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016295517&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016295517</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| geographic_facet | Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| id | DE-604.BV023092673 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T19:41:40Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T11:20:10Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789041126054 9041126058 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016295517 |
| oclc_num | 216928909 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-12 DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-12 DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | LXVI, 610 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Kluwer Law International |
| record_format | marc |
| series | International competition law series |
| series2 | International competition law series |
| spelling | Rodger, Barry J. Verfasser aut Article 234 and competition law an analysis ed. by by Barry J. Rodger Alphen aan den Rijn Kluwer Law International 2008 LXVI, 610 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier International competition law series 33 Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Advisory opinions European Union countries Judicial process Europe Restraint of trade Europe Restraint of trade Europe Cases Restraint of trade European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Cases Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd rswk-swf Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 s DE-604 International competition law series 33 (DE-604)BV014209489 33 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016295517&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Rodger, Barry J. Article 234 and competition law an analysis International competition law series Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Advisory opinions European Union countries Judicial process Europe Restraint of trade Europe Restraint of trade Europe Cases Restraint of trade European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Cases Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4121924-7 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | Article 234 and competition law an analysis |
| title_auth | Article 234 and competition law an analysis |
| title_exact_search | Article 234 and competition law an analysis |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Article 234 and competition law an analysis |
| title_full | Article 234 and competition law an analysis ed. by by Barry J. Rodger |
| title_fullStr | Article 234 and competition law an analysis ed. by by Barry J. Rodger |
| title_full_unstemmed | Article 234 and competition law an analysis ed. by by Barry J. Rodger |
| title_short | Article 234 and competition law |
| title_sort | article 234 and competition law an analysis |
| title_sub | an analysis |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Advisory opinions European Union countries Judicial process Europe Restraint of trade Europe Restraint of trade Europe Cases Restraint of trade European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Cases Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Advisory opinions European Union countries Judicial process Europe Restraint of trade Europe Restraint of trade Europe Cases Restraint of trade European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Cases Wettbewerbsrecht Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016295517&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV014209489 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rodgerbarryj article234andcompetitionlawananalysis |