Verfügbarkeit: Reference and indexicality

Reference and indexicality:

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser:	Rast, Erich H. (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Buch
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	Berlin Logos-Verl. 2007
Schriftenreihe:	Logische Philosophie [17]
Schlagworte:	Index > Semiotik Nichtklassische Logik
Online-Zugang:	Inhaltsverzeichnis
Beschreibung:	X, 328 S. graph. Darst.
ISBN:	9783832517243

Internformat

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 cb4500
001	BV023065648
003	DE-604
005	20081006
007	t
008	080104s2007 d\|\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d
020			\|a 9783832517243 \|9 978-3-8325-1724-3
035			\|a (OCoLC)214418264
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV023065648
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rakwb
041	0		\|a eng
049			\|a DE-12 \|a DE-29 \|a DE-355
082	0		\|a 160 \|2 22/ger
084			\|a CC 2500 \|0 (DE-625)17609: \|2 rvk
084			\|a CC 4800 \|0 (DE-625)17631: \|2 rvk
084			\|a 5,1 \|2 ssgn
100	1		\|a Rast, Erich H. \|e Verfasser \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Reference and indexicality \|c Erich H. Rast
264		1	\|a Berlin \|b Logos-Verl. \|c 2007
300			\|a X, 328 S. \|b graph. Darst.
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
490	1		\|a Logische Philosophie \|v [17]
650	0	7	\|a Index \|g Semiotik \|0 (DE-588)4204589-7 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Nichtklassische Logik \|0 (DE-588)4197462-1 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
689	0	0	\|a Nichtklassische Logik \|0 (DE-588)4197462-1 \|D s
689	0		\|5 DE-604
689	1	0	\|a Index \|g Semiotik \|0 (DE-588)4204589-7 \|D s
689	1		\|5 DE-604
830		0	\|a Logische Philosophie \|v [17] \|w (DE-604)BV011991877 \|9 17
856	4	2	\|m V:DE-604 \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016268853&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Inhaltsverzeichnis
999			\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016268853

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_	1804137306022477824
adam_text	CONTENTS I REFERENCE 1 1 INTRODUCTIONANDTERMINOLOGY 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION................................ 2 1.2 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 1.3 NOTATIONAL CONVENTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6 1.4 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGICAL REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 1.4.1 MEANINGTHEORY: THE BACKGROUND. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8 1.4.2 EMPIRICAL VERSUS IDEAL LANGUAGE PERSPECTIVE. . . . . . . .. 10 1.5 THE NOTION OFREFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14 1.5.1 THE MULTIPLE USES OF REFERENCE» 14 1.5.2 EQUIVOCATION, CO-EXTENSIONALITY, AND CONFLATION . . . . .. 16 1.5.3 SINGULAR AND INDIVIDUAL TERMS, EMPTY SINGULAR TERMS . .. 17 1.5.4 GENERALIZATIONS.......................... 19 2 INDIRECTREFERENCE 21 2.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22 2.2 ORIGINAL PROPOSALS: FREGE AND RUSSELL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22 2.2.1 RUSSELL S ANALYSIS OF PROPER NAMES. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23 2.2.2 FREGE ON SENSE AND REFERENCE 27 2.2.3 FREGE ON PROPER NAMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 32 2.2.4 ABRIEF COMPARISON OF RUSSELL AND FREGE . . . . . . . . . .. 33 2.3 OTHER VARIANTS OFINDIRECT REFERENCE AND DISCUSSION 36 2.3.1 SEARLE S CLUSTER THEORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 36 2.3.2 OTHER NON-MODAL VARIANTS OFDESCRIPTION THEORY . . . . .. 37 2.4 MOTIVATIONS FOR INDIRECT REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 39 2.4.1 COGNITIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF CO-EXTENSIONAL PROPER NAMES .. 40 2.4.2 REFERENTIAL OPACITY OF PROPER NAMES IN ATTITUDE ASCRIPTIONS 41 2.4.3 SYNTHETIC IDENTITY STATEMENTS INVOLVING CO-EXTENSIONAL PROPER NAMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 43 III IV CONTENTS 2.4.4 COGNITIVE AND TRUTH-CONDITIONAL CONTENT OFPROPER NAMES FOR NON-EXISTENT ENTITIES , 43 2.4.5 PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICALASPECTS OFSPEAKER REF- ERENCE 45 2.5 ON IDENTIFYING REFERENCE 46 2.5.1 DONNEL1AN ON DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS , 47 2.5.2 TRANSFER TO PROPER NAMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. , 48 2.5.3 CONCLUDING REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 50 3 DIRECTREFERENCE 53 3.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 54 3.2 DIRECT REFERENCE AND RIGIDITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 54 3.2.1 RIGID DESIGNATION AND KRIPKE S MODAL ARGUMENT .. . . ., 55 3.2.2 RIGID DESIGNATION AS A FORMAL NOTION . . . . . . . . . . . ., 57 3.2.3 THE NEW THEORY OF REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.3 DIRECT REFERENCE AS IMMEDIACY OF REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . .. , 62 3.3.1 MILLIANISM, SEMANTIC REFERENCE, AND RIGIDITY , 62 3.3.2 MILLIANISM AND SPEAKER REFERENCE , 64 3.4 DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT REFERENCE .., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 67 3.4.1 SOME KNOWN DEFENSES OFDESCRIPTION THEORY , 67 3.4.2 PRO AND CONTRA MODAL DESCRIPTION THEORY . . . . . . . . ., 73 3.4.3 FURTHER UTERATURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 80 3.4.4 CONCLUDING REMARKS , 81 4 ADESCRIPTIONTHEORYOF REFERENCE 83 4.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.2 OUTLINE OFTHE PROPOSAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.3 MEANING THEORETICAL BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.3.1 GENUINE DUAL ASPECT THEORIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 4.3.2 THE ROLE OFDISQUOTATION .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 4.3.3 DUAL ASPECT THEORY REVISED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 4.4 TOWARDS A THEORY OF INDIRECT REFERENCE . . . . . . , 92 4.4.1 THE PROBLEM OF RIGIDITY FOR DESCRIPTIVISM 93 4.4.2 REFERENTIAL MULTIPLICITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 94 4.4.3 MODELING SPEAKER REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 96 4.5 OBJECTIONS AND REFINEMENTS 97 4.5.1 DEFENSE AGAINST EPISTEMIC AND SEMANTIC ARGUMENTS , 98 4.5.2 DEFENSE AGAINST THE CIRCULARITY OBJECTION 100 4.5.3 DEFENSE AGAINST THE CHURCH-LANGFORD TRANSLATION TEST. . . 103 CONTENTS V 4.5.4 THE ROLE OFIDENTIFICATION CRITERIA . . . . . . . . 104 4.5.5 THE PROBLEM OFNESTED MODALITIES . . . 105 4.5.6 SUMMARY 106 4.6 IMPLEMENTING DESCRIPTION THEORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.6.1 IMPLEMENTING RELATIVIZED RIGIDITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UO 4.6.2 COMPOSITIONALITY......................... 115 11 INDEXICALITY 129 5 INDEXICALS 131 5.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 5.2 INTRODUCTION............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 5.2.1 TERMINOLOGY 132 5.2.2 BRIEF HISTORICAL OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 5.2.3 MORE TERMINOLOGY AND EXCLUSION OF SOME PHENOMENA. . . 137 5.3 DIMENSIONS OFINDEXICALITY 142 5.3.1 THE PERSON DIMENSION. . . . . . . . . . 142 5.3.2 THE SPATIAL DIMENSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 5.3.3 THETEMPORALDIMENSION 149 5.3.4 THE MODAL DIMENSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 5.3.5 OTHER DIMENSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 5.4 INDEXICAL REFERENCE 157 5.4.1 TOKEN-REFLEXIVITY 157 5.4.2 UTTERANCE-BASED REFERENCE RULES 159 5.4.3 ON THE CONTENT OFREFERENCE RULES 165 5.4.4 THEVARIETIESOFCONTEXTS 168 5.4.5 INDEXICALS AND RIGIDITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 5.4.6 RIGIDITY AND TOKEN-REFLEXIVITY 176 5.4.7 INDEXICAL SPEAKER REFERENCE 177 5.4.8 INDEXICAL VS. NON-INDEXICAL REFERENCE 178 6 INDEXICALSINMODALLOGIC 181 6.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW 182 6.2 BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 6.3 A DOUBLE-INDEX MODAL LOGIC: DIML 185 6.3.1 SYNTAX 185 6.3.2 SEMANTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 6.3.3 INDIRECT SPEECH AND BELIEF OPERATORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 6.3.4 TECHNICAL REMARKS 192 VI CONTENTS 6.4 EXAMPLES AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 6.4.1 LNDEXICALS 193 6.4.2 DEMONSTRATIVES.......................... 195 6.4.3 THE ROLE OF DTHAT AND DIAGONALIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 6.5 SHIFTERS IN DOUBLE-INDEX MODAL LOGIC 198 6.5.1 MONSTERS.......................... 198 6.5.2 SHIFTERS AND DIAGONALIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 6.5.3 LANGUAGE SDML . 201 6.6 SHORTCOMINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 6.6.1 CRESSWELL SARGUMENT 202 6.6.2 CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS VERSUS CONTEXT OF UTTERANCE 204 6.6.3 SELECTIONAL FEATURES AND OTHER MISSING INGREDIENTS. . . . . 204 6.6.4 FURTHER LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 7 INDEXICALS IN PREDICATE LOGIC 207 7.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 7.2 LANGUAGE FOLC 208 7.2.1 SYNTAX 209 7.2.2 SEMANTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 7.2.3 SOME TECHNICAL REMARKS . . . . . . . 218 7.2.4 AUXILIARY NOTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 7.2.5 MODALITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 7.2.6 TENSE BINDERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 7.3 THE DEICTIC CENTER 227 7.3.1 NOW 227 7.3.2 HERE 230 7.3.3 I 232 7.3.4 ACTUALLY 233 7.4 COMPLEX INDICATORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 7.4.1 EXAMPLE: YESTERDAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 7.4.2 EXAMPLE: THE FORMER PRESIDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 7.4.3 EXAMPLE: WE 237 7.4.4 EXAMPLE: THE LEFT ENTRANCE 239 7.5 DEMONSTRATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 7.5.1 EXAMPLE: THIS AND THAT 240 7.5.2 EXAMPLE: KORE, SORE, ARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 7.6 SHIFTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 7.6.1 EXAMPLE: AMHARIC FIRST-PERSON INDICATOR 245 7.6.2 EXAMPLE: RUSSIAN PRESENT TENSE 246 CONTENTS VII 7.6.3 EXAMPLE: DIMLI VIZERI 247 7.7 SIMPLIFICATIONS AND EXTENSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 7.7.1 ON THE ELIMINABILITY OF CONTEXT -DEPENDENCY . . . 249 7.7.2 POSSIBLE EXTENSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 7.7.3 LIMITS OF REIFIED CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS 252 8 INDEXICALSIN THINKING 255 8.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 8.2 DE DICTO COGNITIVE CONTENT OFINDEXICALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 8.2.1 EXAMPLE: NOW 257 8.2.2 EXAMPLE: HERE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 8.2.3 EXAMPLE: I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 8.3 ESSENTIAL INDEXICALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 8.3.1 THE IRREDUCIBILITYTHESIS 263 8.3.2 SELF-LOCATINGBELIEF................... 265 8.3.3 QUASI-INDICATORS 267 8.3.4 THE CONNECTION TO NOTIONS OF BELIEF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 8.4 IRREDUCIBILITY IN THINKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 8.4.1 THE PROBLEM OFIR-LYPE ARGUMENTS FOR DESCRIPTIVISM . . . 269 8.4.2 PRO IFRTIN EPISODAL THINKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 8.4.3 ARE THERE INDEXICAL THOUGHTS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 8.5 FROM THINKING TO LANGUAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 8.5.1 IR-TYPE ARGUMENTS AND COGNITIVE CONTENT . . . . . . . . . . 276 8.5.2 WHICH KIND OF COGNITIVE CONTENT IS NEEDED? . . . . . . . . . 280 8.5.3 BELIEFAND BEHAVIORAL DISPOSITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284 8.5.4 CONCLUDING REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 A FIRST-ORDERMODALLOGIC 291 B MISCELLANEOUSPROOFS 297
adam_txt	CONTENTS I REFERENCE 1 1 INTRODUCTIONANDTERMINOLOGY 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION. 2 1.2 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.3 NOTATIONAL CONVENTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.4 BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGICAL REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.4.1 MEANINGTHEORY: THE BACKGROUND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.4.2 EMPIRICAL VERSUS IDEAL LANGUAGE PERSPECTIVE. . . . . . . . 10 1.5 THE NOTION OFREFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.5.1 THE MULTIPLE USES OF REFERENCE» 14 1.5.2 EQUIVOCATION, CO-EXTENSIONALITY, AND CONFLATION . . . . . 16 1.5.3 SINGULAR AND INDIVIDUAL TERMS, EMPTY SINGULAR TERMS . . 17 1.5.4 GENERALIZATIONS. 19 2 INDIRECTREFERENCE 21 2.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.2 ORIGINAL PROPOSALS: FREGE AND RUSSELL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.2.1 RUSSELL'S ANALYSIS OF PROPER NAMES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.2.2 FREGE ON SENSE AND REFERENCE 27 2.2.3 FREGE ON PROPER NAMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 2.2.4 ABRIEF COMPARISON OF RUSSELL AND FREGE . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.3 OTHER VARIANTS OFINDIRECT REFERENCE AND DISCUSSION 36 2.3.1 SEARLE'S CLUSTER THEORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.3.2 OTHER NON-MODAL VARIANTS OFDESCRIPTION THEORY . . . . . 37 2.4 MOTIVATIONS FOR INDIRECT REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 2.4.1 COGNITIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF CO-EXTENSIONAL PROPER NAMES . 40 2.4.2 REFERENTIAL OPACITY OF PROPER NAMES IN ATTITUDE ASCRIPTIONS 41 2.4.3 SYNTHETIC IDENTITY STATEMENTS INVOLVING CO-EXTENSIONAL PROPER NAMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 III IV CONTENTS 2.4.4 COGNITIVE AND TRUTH-CONDITIONAL CONTENT OFPROPER NAMES FOR NON-EXISTENT ENTITIES , 43 2.4.5 PSYCHOLOGICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICALASPECTS OFSPEAKER REF- ERENCE 45 2.5 ON IDENTIFYING REFERENCE 46 2.5.1 DONNEL1AN ON DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS , 47 2.5.2 TRANSFER TO PROPER NAMES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 48 2.5.3 CONCLUDING REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 50 3 DIRECTREFERENCE 53 3.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 3.2 DIRECT REFERENCE AND RIGIDITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 54 3.2.1 RIGID DESIGNATION AND KRIPKE'S MODAL ARGUMENT . . . ., 55 3.2.2 RIGID DESIGNATION AS A FORMAL NOTION . . . . . . . . . . . ., 57 3.2.3 THE NEW THEORY OF REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3.3 DIRECT REFERENCE AS IMMEDIACY OF REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . , 62 3.3.1 MILLIANISM, SEMANTIC REFERENCE, AND RIGIDITY , 62 3.3.2 MILLIANISM AND SPEAKER REFERENCE , 64 3.4 DIRECT VERSUS INDIRECT REFERENCE ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 67 3.4.1 SOME KNOWN DEFENSES OFDESCRIPTION THEORY , 67 3.4.2 PRO AND CONTRA MODAL DESCRIPTION THEORY . . . . . . . . ., 73 3.4.3 FURTHER UTERATURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 80 3.4.4 CONCLUDING REMARKS , 81 4 ADESCRIPTIONTHEORYOF REFERENCE 83 4.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.2 OUTLINE OFTHE PROPOSAL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.3 MEANING THEORETICAL BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.3.1 GENUINE DUAL ASPECT THEORIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 4.3.2 THE ROLE OFDISQUOTATION .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 4.3.3 DUAL ASPECT THEORY REVISED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 4.4 TOWARDS A THEORY OF INDIRECT REFERENCE . . . . . . , 92 4.4.1 THE PROBLEM OF RIGIDITY FOR DESCRIPTIVISM 93 4.4.2 REFERENTIAL MULTIPLICITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 4.4.3 MODELING SPEAKER REFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 96 4.5 OBJECTIONS AND REFINEMENTS 97 4.5.1 DEFENSE AGAINST EPISTEMIC AND SEMANTIC ARGUMENTS , 98 4.5.2 DEFENSE AGAINST THE CIRCULARITY OBJECTION 100 4.5.3 DEFENSE AGAINST THE CHURCH-LANGFORD TRANSLATION TEST. . . 103 CONTENTS V 4.5.4 THE ROLE OFIDENTIFICATION CRITERIA . . . . . . . . 104 4.5.5 THE PROBLEM OFNESTED MODALITIES . . . 105 4.5.6 SUMMARY 106 4.6 IMPLEMENTING DESCRIPTION THEORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 4.6.1 IMPLEMENTING RELATIVIZED RIGIDITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UO 4.6.2 COMPOSITIONALITY. 115 11 INDEXICALITY 129 5 INDEXICALS 131 5.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 5.2 INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 5.2.1 TERMINOLOGY 132 5.2.2 BRIEF HISTORICAL OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 5.2.3 MORE TERMINOLOGY AND EXCLUSION OF SOME PHENOMENA. . . 137 5.3 DIMENSIONS OFINDEXICALITY 142 5.3.1 THE PERSON DIMENSION. . . . . . . . . . 142 5.3.2 THE SPATIAL DIMENSION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 5.3.3 THETEMPORALDIMENSION 149 5.3.4 THE MODAL DIMENSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 5.3.5 OTHER DIMENSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 5.4 INDEXICAL REFERENCE 157 5.4.1 TOKEN-REFLEXIVITY 157 5.4.2 UTTERANCE-BASED REFERENCE RULES 159 5.4.3 ON THE CONTENT OFREFERENCE RULES 165 5.4.4 THEVARIETIESOFCONTEXTS 168 5.4.5 INDEXICALS AND RIGIDITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 5.4.6 RIGIDITY AND TOKEN-REFLEXIVITY 176 5.4.7 INDEXICAL SPEAKER REFERENCE 177 5.4.8 INDEXICAL VS. NON-INDEXICAL REFERENCE 178 6 INDEXICALSINMODALLOGIC 181 6.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW 182 6.2 BACKGROUND AND MOTIVATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 6.3 A DOUBLE-INDEX MODAL LOGIC: DIML 185 6.3.1 SYNTAX 185 6.3.2 SEMANTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 6.3.3 INDIRECT SPEECH AND BELIEF OPERATORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 6.3.4 TECHNICAL REMARKS 192 VI CONTENTS 6.4 EXAMPLES AND DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 6.4.1 LNDEXICALS 193 6.4.2 DEMONSTRATIVES. 195 6.4.3 THE ROLE OF DTHAT AND DIAGONALIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 6.5 SHIFTERS IN DOUBLE-INDEX MODAL LOGIC 198 6.5.1 MONSTERS. 198 6.5.2 SHIFTERS AND DIAGONALIZATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 6.5.3 LANGUAGE SDML . 201 6.6 SHORTCOMINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202 6.6.1 CRESSWELL'SARGUMENT 202 6.6.2 CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS VERSUS CONTEXT OF UTTERANCE 204 6.6.3 SELECTIONAL FEATURES AND OTHER MISSING INGREDIENTS. . . . . 204 6.6.4 FURTHER LITERATURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 7 INDEXICALS IN PREDICATE LOGIC 207 7.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 7.2 LANGUAGE FOLC 208 7.2.1 SYNTAX 209 7.2.2 SEMANTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 7.2.3 SOME TECHNICAL REMARKS . . . . . . . 218 7.2.4 AUXILIARY NOTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 7.2.5 MODALITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 7.2.6 TENSE BINDERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 7.3 THE DEICTIC CENTER 227 7.3.1 NOW 227 7.3.2 HERE 230 7.3.3 I 232 7.3.4 ACTUALLY 233 7.4 COMPLEX INDICATORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 7.4.1 EXAMPLE: YESTERDAY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 7.4.2 EXAMPLE: THE FORMER PRESIDENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 7.4.3 EXAMPLE: WE 237 7.4.4 EXAMPLE: THE LEFT ENTRANCE 239 7.5 DEMONSTRATIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 7.5.1 EXAMPLE: THIS AND THAT 240 7.5.2 EXAMPLE: KORE, SORE, ARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 7.6 SHIFTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 7.6.1 EXAMPLE: AMHARIC FIRST-PERSON INDICATOR 245 7.6.2 EXAMPLE: RUSSIAN PRESENT TENSE 246 CONTENTS VII 7.6.3 EXAMPLE: DIMLI VIZERI 247 7.7 SIMPLIFICATIONS AND EXTENSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 7.7.1 ON THE ELIMINABILITY OF CONTEXT -DEPENDENCY . . . 249 7.7.2 POSSIBLE EXTENSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 7.7.3 LIMITS OF REIFIED CONVERSATIONAL CONTEXTS 252 8 INDEXICALSIN THINKING 255 8.1 CHAPTER OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 8.2 DE DICTO COGNITIVE CONTENT OFINDEXICALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 8.2.1 EXAMPLE: NOW 257 8.2.2 EXAMPLE: HERE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 8.2.3 EXAMPLE: I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 8.3 ESSENTIAL INDEXICALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 8.3.1 THE IRREDUCIBILITYTHESIS 263 8.3.2 SELF-LOCATINGBELIEF. 265 8.3.3 QUASI-INDICATORS 267 8.3.4 THE CONNECTION TO NOTIONS OF BELIEF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 8.4 IRREDUCIBILITY IN THINKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 8.4.1 THE PROBLEM OFIR-LYPE ARGUMENTS FOR DESCRIPTIVISM . . . 269 8.4.2 PRO IFRTIN EPISODAL THINKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270 8.4.3 ARE THERE INDEXICAL THOUGHTS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 8.5 FROM THINKING TO LANGUAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 8.5.1 IR-TYPE ARGUMENTS AND COGNITIVE CONTENT . . . . . . . . . . 276 8.5.2 WHICH KIND OF COGNITIVE CONTENT IS NEEDED? . . . . . . . . . 280 8.5.3 BELIEFAND BEHAVIORAL DISPOSITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284 8.5.4 CONCLUDING REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 287 A FIRST-ORDERMODALLOGIC 291 B MISCELLANEOUSPROOFS 297
any_adam_object	1
any_adam_object_boolean	1
author	Rast, Erich H.
author_facet	Rast, Erich H.
author_role	aut
author_sort	Rast, Erich H.
author_variant	e h r eh ehr
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV023065648
classification_rvk	CC 2500 CC 4800
ctrlnum	(OCoLC)214418264 (DE-599)BVBBV023065648
dewey-full	160
dewey-hundreds	100 - Philosophy & psychology
dewey-ones	160 - Philosophical logic
dewey-raw	160
dewey-search	160
dewey-sort	3160
dewey-tens	160 - Philosophical logic
discipline	Philosophie
discipline_str_mv	Philosophie
format	Book
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01498nam a2200409 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023065648</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20081006 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080104s2007 d\|\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783832517243</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-8325-1724-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)214418264</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023065648</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">160</subfield><subfield code="2">22/ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 2500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17609:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 4800</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17631:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rast, Erich H.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Reference and indexicality</subfield><subfield code="c">Erich H. Rast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="b">Logos-Verl.</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 328 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Logische Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="v">[17]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Index</subfield><subfield code="g">Semiotik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4204589-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nichtklassische Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197462-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nichtklassische Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4197462-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Index</subfield><subfield code="g">Semiotik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4204589-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Logische Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="v">[17]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV011991877</subfield><subfield code="9">17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">V:DE-604</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016268853&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016268853</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id	DE-604.BV023065648
illustrated	Illustrated
index_date	2024-07-02T19:30:37Z
indexdate	2024-07-09T21:10:11Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9783832517243
language	English
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016268853
oclc_num	214418264
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-12 DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR
owner_facet	DE-12 DE-29 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR
physical	X, 328 S. graph. Darst.
publishDate	2007
publishDateSearch	2007
publishDateSort	2007
publisher	Logos-Verl.
record_format	marc
series	Logische Philosophie
series2	Logische Philosophie
spelling	Rast, Erich H. Verfasser aut Reference and indexicality Erich H. Rast Berlin Logos-Verl. 2007 X, 328 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Logische Philosophie [17] Index Semiotik (DE-588)4204589-7 gnd rswk-swf Nichtklassische Logik (DE-588)4197462-1 gnd rswk-swf Nichtklassische Logik (DE-588)4197462-1 s DE-604 Index Semiotik (DE-588)4204589-7 s Logische Philosophie [17] (DE-604)BV011991877 17 V:DE-604 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016268853&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis
spellingShingle	Rast, Erich H. Reference and indexicality Logische Philosophie Index Semiotik (DE-588)4204589-7 gnd Nichtklassische Logik (DE-588)4197462-1 gnd
subject_GND	(DE-588)4204589-7 (DE-588)4197462-1
title	Reference and indexicality
title_auth	Reference and indexicality
title_exact_search	Reference and indexicality
title_exact_search_txtP	Reference and indexicality
title_full	Reference and indexicality Erich H. Rast
title_fullStr	Reference and indexicality Erich H. Rast
title_full_unstemmed	Reference and indexicality Erich H. Rast
title_short	Reference and indexicality
title_sort	reference and indexicality
topic	Index Semiotik (DE-588)4204589-7 gnd Nichtklassische Logik (DE-588)4197462-1 gnd
topic_facet	Index Semiotik Nichtklassische Logik
url	http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016268853&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
volume_link	(DE-604)BV011991877
work_keys_str_mv	AT rasterichh referenceandindexicality

Verfügbarkeit

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Inhaltsverzeichnis

MARC

Datensatz im Suchindex

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Ähnliche Einträge