Tradition and change in administrative law: an Anglo-German comparison
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Berlin ; Heidelberg ; New York
Springer
2007
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | UBG01 UBR01 UPA01 Volltext Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Literaturverz. S. 254 - 261 |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 266 S.) |
| ISBN: | 9783540486886 9783540486893 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023064700 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20080331 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 080103s2007 gw |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 981928579 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 9783540486886 |c Pp. : EUR 106.95 (freier Pr.) |9 978-3-540-48688-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783540486893 |c Online |9 978-3-540-48689-3 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 |2 doi | |
| 024 | 3 | |a 9783540486886 | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a 11919414 |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)255429500 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DNB981928579 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a gw |c XA-DE-BE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.4106 |2 22/ger | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.4306 |2 22/ger | |
| 084 | |a PN 980 |0 (DE-625)137857: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 340 |2 sdnb | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tradition and change in administrative law |b an Anglo-German comparison |c Martina Künnecke |
| 264 | 1 | |a Berlin ; Heidelberg ; New York |b Springer |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 266 S.) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverz. S. 254 - 261 | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verwaltungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4063351-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Verwaltungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4063351-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Künnecke, Martina |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m DNB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016267916&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-SHU | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016267916 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-2-SHU |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 |l UBR01 |p ZDB-2-SHU |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-2-SHU |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137304491556864 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION...................................................................................1
THE COMPARATIVE METHOD IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC
LAW...........................................4
CHAPTER TWO THE DEVELOPMENT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE
ACTION.11
I. HISTORICAL
INTRODUCTION..............................................................................11
1. THE COMMON LAW
COURTS........................................................................11
2. THE TRIBUNAL
SYSTEM...............................................................................18
3. THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEPARATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN NINETEENTH
CENTURY
GERMANY...................................................................................21
4. THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TRADITION IN
GERMANY.......................................22
II. THE CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF THE COURTS
.........................................................25
1. THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN JUDICIAL
REVIEW
IN ENGLAND
.............................................................................................25
2. THE BASIC LAW AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS.....................................28
III. THE GROUNDS OF
REVIEW..............................................................................31
1. THE GROUNDS OF REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IN
ENGLAND................31
2. THE GROUNDS OF REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IN
GERMANY..............34
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REMEDIES FOR UNLAWFUL GOVERNMENT
ACTION.................39
1. REMEDIES IN ENGLISH
COURTS...................................................................39
2. REMEDIES IN GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS........................................42
V. PROCEDURAL
ASPECTS.....................................................................................44
1. THE ADVERSARIAL
PROCEDURE.....................................................................44
2. THE INQUISITORIAL
PROCEDURE...................................................................46
VI. CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION - THE INSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION
.........................47
1.
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................47
2. THE ANCIENT OFFICE OF LORD
CHANCELLOR..................................................49
3. THE NEW SUPREME
COURT.......................................................................51
4. THE LONG PATH TO GERMANY S CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT................................55
5. THE SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENTS
COMMISSION..................................56
6. DIVERSITY IN THE APPOINTMENTS
PROCESS..................................................58
7. JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE UNDER THE BASIC
LAW.........................................60
8. QUALIFICATION FOR JUDICIAL OFFICE IN
GERMANY.........................................62
A) THE SELECTION PROCESS - FEDERAL LEVEL
.................................................63
B) THE SELECTION PROCESS AT THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT................66
C) THE SELECTION PROCESS AT STATE
LEVEL....................................................67
X TABLE OF CONTENTS
VII.
CONCLUSION...............................................................................................69
CHAPTER THREE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DISCRETIONARY
POWERS.................................73
I. INTRODUCTION
..............................................................................................73
1. THE CONCEPT OF DISCRETION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DISCRETIONARY POWERS IN
ENGLAND..............................74
2. THE CONCEPT OF DISCRETION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DISCRETIONARY POWERS IN
GERMANY.............................77
3.
EVALUATION.............................................................................................83
II. COMPARATIVE
CASES....................................................................................83
1. FAILURE TO EXERCISE DISCRETION UNDER ENGLISH
LAW..................................83
A) REVIEW OF SELF-CREATED
RULES..............................................................84
B) UNAUTHORISED DELEGATION OF
POWER....................................................86
C) ACTING UNDER
DICTATION.......................................................................86
D) FETTERING DISCRETION BY CONTRACTUAL
UNDERTAKING................................87
2. FAILURE TO EXERCISE DISCRETION IN GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW................89
A) REVIEW OF SELF-CREATED
RULES..............................................................89
B) UNAUTHORISED DELEGATION OF
POWER....................................................89
C) FETTERING DISCRETION BY CONTRACTUAL
UNDERTAKING................................90
3.
EVALUATION.............................................................................................91
4. ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN ENGLISH
LAW.......................................................92
A) USE OF POWER FOR AN IMPROPER
PURPOSE..............................................92
B)
UNREASONABLENESS..............................................................................93
C) THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN ENGLISH ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW.........95
D) THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION IN ENGLISH
ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW...........................................................................105
5. ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN GERMAN LAW
....................................................110
A) THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW......110
B) HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION AND DISCRETION IN GERMANY
......................114
C) UNDEFINED LEGAL
CONCEPTS................................................................119
D) EUROPEAN STANDARDS FOR THE INTENSITY OF
REVIEW...............................122
E) THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS (VERTRAUENSSCHUTZ) IN
GERMAN
LAW.....................................................................................124
F) THE EUROPEANISATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS
IN GERMAN
LAW.................................................................................127
G) THE PRINCIPLE OF
EQUALITY.................................................................128
III.
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................131
CHAPTER FOUR PROCEDURAL ERRORS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE..............137
I. INTRODUCTION
............................................................................................137
1. THE RULES OF NATURAL JUSTICE IN ENGLISH
LAW..........................................138
2. THE DUTY TO ACT
FAIRLY...........................................................................143
3. THE DUTY TO GIVE
REASONS.....................................................................144
4. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL
ERRORS............................................147
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI
5. GERMANY S LAW ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
(VERWALTUNGSVERFAHRENSGESETZ)
1976..................................................147
6. THE RIGHT TO A
HEARING..........................................................................149
7. THE DUTY TO GIVE
REASONS.....................................................................150
8. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL
ERRORS............................................151
9.
EVALUATION...........................................................................................155
II. COMPARATIVE
CASES..................................................................................157
1. THE RIGHT TO A
HEARING..........................................................................157
A) LEGAL EFFECTS OF DENIAL OF A HEARING IN ENGLISH
COURTS.....................157
B) LEGAL EFFECTS OF DENIAL OF A HEARING -
GERMANY...............................159
C) EVALUATION
.......................................................................................160
2. THE DUTY TO GIVE
REASONS.....................................................................160
A) DEFICIENT REASONS MADE GOOD IN COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS - ENGLAND..160
B) DEFICIENT REASONS MADE GOOD IN COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS - GERMANY
161
C) EVALUATION
.......................................................................................162
III. EUROPEAN
INFLUENCES................................................................................163
1. ENGLISH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND ART. 6(1) OF THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS.............................................................163
2. GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND ART. 6(1) OF THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS.............................................................166
3. THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE
LAW......................................................................................167
IV.
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................169
CHAPTER FIVE GOVERNMENTAL
LIABILITY..............................................................173
I.
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................173
1. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY IN ENGLISH
COURTS............................................173
A)
NEGLIGENCE.......................................................................................174
B) BREACH OF STATUTORY
DUTY..................................................................182
C) VICARIOUS
LIABILITY............................................................................183
D) MISFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE
...........................................................183
E) CROWN IMMUNITY
.............................................................................184
2. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY IN
GERMANY....................................................185
A) TORTIOUS LIABILITY ACCORDING TO SECTION 839 OF THE
CIVIL CODE (BGB) IN CONNECTION WITH ART. 34 OF THE BASIC LAW.....186
AA) PERSONS EXERCISING PUBLIC
OFFICE................................................188
BB) BREACH OF DUTY
..........................................................................188
CC) DUTY TOWARDS A THIRD
PARTY.........................................................189
3.
EVALUATION...........................................................................................190
II. COMPARATIVE CASES - GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY AND HUMAN
RIGHTS.............191
1. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY FOR BREACHES OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE
UK........191
A) THE ENGLISH LAW OF NEGLIGENCE UNDER EUROPEAN
INFLUENCE..............191
AA) THE RULING OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN
OSMAN V
UK..............................................................................192
BB) IMPACT OF THE RULING IN OSMAN ON SUBSEQUENT DECISIONS...........194
XII TABLE OF CONTENTS
CC) THE RULING OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
IN Z V UK
..................................................................................196
DD) IMPACT OF THE DECISION IN Z V UK ON THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE.....198
B) DAMAGES FOR BREACHES OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
1998...................201
2. CHILD ABUSE CLAIMS IN
GERMANY..........................................................203
A) SECTION 839 BGB IN CONNECTION WITH ART. 34 BASIC
LAW................205
AA) DUTY OF CARE OWED TO A THIRD PARTY
............................................205
BB)
FAULT..........................................................................................206
CC) CAUSATION
..................................................................................206
B) THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE LAW GOVERNING CHILDCARE
......206
C) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN CHILDCARE
CASES........207
D) THE VIOLATION OF BASIC RIGHTS AND
COMPENSATION..............................210
3.
EVALUATION...........................................................................................211
III. COMPARATIVE CASES - MEMBER STATE LIABILITY IN GERMAN AND
ENGLISH
COURTS.........................................................................................215
1. THE NATURE OF THE REMEDY IN DOMESTIC LAW -
GERMANY.......................217
A) RIGHTS UNDER COMMUNITY LAW AND DUTY TOWARDS A THIRD PARTY IN
GERMAN
LAW.....................................................................................218
B) THE FAULT REQUIREMENT IN GERMAN
LAW.............................................219
C) EUROPEANISATION OF THE GERMAN LAW OF GOVERNMENTAL
LIABILITY........220
2. THE NATURE OF THE REMEDY IN DOMESTIC LAW - UNITED
KINGDOM...........222
3. THE CONDITION OF SUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS BREACH IN GERMAN
AND ENGLISH
DECISIONS..........................................................................223
4. CAUSATION IN MEMBER STATE
LIABILITY.....................................................231
A) R V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, EX P GALLAGHER...234
B) GERMANY - BREACH OF PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS AND
CAUSATION.............235
IV.
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................241
CHAPTER SIX TRADITION AND CHANGE
.................................................................243
|
| adam_txt |
CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION.1
THE COMPARATIVE METHOD IN THE FIELD OF PUBLIC
LAW.4
CHAPTER TWO THE DEVELOPMENT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE
ACTION.11
I. HISTORICAL
INTRODUCTION.11
1. THE COMMON LAW
COURTS.11
2. THE TRIBUNAL
SYSTEM.18
3. THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEPARATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN NINETEENTH
CENTURY
GERMANY.21
4. THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TRADITION IN
GERMANY.22
II. THE CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF THE COURTS
.25
1. THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN JUDICIAL
REVIEW
IN ENGLAND
.25
2. THE BASIC LAW AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS.28
III. THE GROUNDS OF
REVIEW.31
1. THE GROUNDS OF REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IN
ENGLAND.31
2. THE GROUNDS OF REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IN
GERMANY.34
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REMEDIES FOR UNLAWFUL GOVERNMENT
ACTION.39
1. REMEDIES IN ENGLISH
COURTS.39
2. REMEDIES IN GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS.42
V. PROCEDURAL
ASPECTS.44
1. THE ADVERSARIAL
PROCEDURE.44
2. THE INQUISITORIAL
PROCEDURE.46
VI. CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION - THE INSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION
.47
1.
INTRODUCTION.47
2. THE ANCIENT OFFICE OF LORD
CHANCELLOR.49
3. THE NEW SUPREME
COURT.51
4. THE LONG PATH TO GERMANY'S CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT.55
5. THE SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENTS
COMMISSION.56
6. DIVERSITY IN THE APPOINTMENTS
PROCESS.58
7. JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE UNDER THE BASIC
LAW.60
8. QUALIFICATION FOR JUDICIAL OFFICE IN
GERMANY.62
A) THE SELECTION PROCESS - FEDERAL LEVEL
.63
B) THE SELECTION PROCESS AT THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL
COURT.66
C) THE SELECTION PROCESS AT STATE
LEVEL.67
X TABLE OF CONTENTS
VII.
CONCLUSION.69
CHAPTER THREE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DISCRETIONARY
POWERS.73
I. INTRODUCTION
.73
1. THE CONCEPT OF DISCRETION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DISCRETIONARY POWERS IN
ENGLAND.74
2. THE CONCEPT OF DISCRETION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DISCRETIONARY POWERS IN
GERMANY.77
3.
EVALUATION.83
II. COMPARATIVE
CASES.83
1. FAILURE TO EXERCISE DISCRETION UNDER ENGLISH
LAW.83
A) REVIEW OF SELF-CREATED
RULES.84
B) UNAUTHORISED DELEGATION OF
POWER.86
C) ACTING UNDER
DICTATION.86
D) FETTERING DISCRETION BY CONTRACTUAL
UNDERTAKING.87
2. FAILURE TO EXERCISE DISCRETION IN GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW.89
A) REVIEW OF SELF-CREATED
RULES.89
B) UNAUTHORISED DELEGATION OF
POWER.89
C) FETTERING DISCRETION BY CONTRACTUAL
UNDERTAKING.90
3.
EVALUATION.91
4. ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN ENGLISH
LAW.92
A) USE OF POWER FOR AN IMPROPER
PURPOSE.92
B)
UNREASONABLENESS.93
C) THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN ENGLISH ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW.95
D) THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATION IN ENGLISH
ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW.105
5. ABUSE OF DISCRETION IN GERMAN LAW
.110
A) THE PRINCIPLE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
LAW.110
B) HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION AND DISCRETION IN GERMANY
.114
C) UNDEFINED LEGAL
CONCEPTS.119
D) EUROPEAN STANDARDS FOR THE INTENSITY OF
REVIEW.122
E) THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS (VERTRAUENSSCHUTZ) IN
GERMAN
LAW.124
F) THE EUROPEANISATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS
IN GERMAN
LAW.127
G) THE PRINCIPLE OF
EQUALITY.128
III.
CONCLUSION.131
CHAPTER FOUR PROCEDURAL ERRORS IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE.137
I. INTRODUCTION
.137
1. THE RULES OF NATURAL JUSTICE IN ENGLISH
LAW.138
2. THE DUTY TO ACT
FAIRLY.143
3. THE DUTY TO GIVE
REASONS.144
4. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL
ERRORS.147
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI
5. GERMANY'S LAW ON ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
(VERWALTUNGSVERFAHRENSGESETZ)
1976.147
6. THE RIGHT TO A
HEARING.149
7. THE DUTY TO GIVE
REASONS.150
8. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL
ERRORS.151
9.
EVALUATION.155
II. COMPARATIVE
CASES.157
1. THE RIGHT TO A
HEARING.157
A) LEGAL EFFECTS OF DENIAL OF A HEARING IN ENGLISH
COURTS.157
B) LEGAL EFFECTS OF DENIAL OF A HEARING -
GERMANY.159
C) EVALUATION
.160
2. THE DUTY TO GIVE
REASONS.160
A) DEFICIENT REASONS MADE GOOD IN COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS - ENGLAND.160
B) DEFICIENT REASONS MADE GOOD IN COURSE OF PROCEEDINGS - GERMANY
161
C) EVALUATION
.162
III. EUROPEAN
INFLUENCES.163
1. ENGLISH ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND ART. 6(1) OF THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS.163
2. GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW AND ART. 6(1) OF THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION ON HUMAN
RIGHTS.166
3. THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND GERMAN ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURE
LAW.167
IV.
CONCLUSION.169
CHAPTER FIVE GOVERNMENTAL
LIABILITY.173
I.
INTRODUCTION.173
1. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY IN ENGLISH
COURTS.173
A)
NEGLIGENCE.174
B) BREACH OF STATUTORY
DUTY.182
C) VICARIOUS
LIABILITY.183
D) MISFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE
.183
E) CROWN IMMUNITY
.184
2. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY IN
GERMANY.185
A) TORTIOUS LIABILITY ACCORDING TO SECTION 839 OF THE
CIVIL CODE (BGB) IN CONNECTION WITH ART. 34 OF THE BASIC LAW.186
AA) PERSONS EXERCISING PUBLIC
OFFICE.188
BB) BREACH OF DUTY
.188
CC) DUTY TOWARDS A THIRD
PARTY.189
3.
EVALUATION.190
II. COMPARATIVE CASES - GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY AND HUMAN
RIGHTS.191
1. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY FOR BREACHES OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE
UK.191
A) THE ENGLISH LAW OF NEGLIGENCE UNDER EUROPEAN
INFLUENCE.191
AA) THE RULING OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN
OSMAN V
UK.192
BB) IMPACT OF THE RULING IN OSMAN ON SUBSEQUENT DECISIONS.194
XII TABLE OF CONTENTS
CC) THE RULING OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
IN Z V UK
.196
DD) IMPACT OF THE DECISION IN Z V UK ON THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE.198
B) DAMAGES FOR BREACHES OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
1998.201
2. CHILD ABUSE CLAIMS IN
GERMANY.203
A) SECTION 839 BGB IN CONNECTION WITH ART. 34 BASIC
LAW.205
AA) DUTY OF CARE OWED TO A THIRD PARTY
.205
BB)
FAULT.206
CC) CAUSATION
.206
B) THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE LAW GOVERNING CHILDCARE
.206
C) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS IN CHILDCARE
CASES.207
D) THE VIOLATION OF BASIC RIGHTS AND
COMPENSATION.210
3.
EVALUATION.211
III. COMPARATIVE CASES - MEMBER STATE LIABILITY IN GERMAN AND
ENGLISH
COURTS.215
1. THE NATURE OF THE REMEDY IN DOMESTIC LAW -
GERMANY.217
A) RIGHTS UNDER COMMUNITY LAW AND DUTY TOWARDS A THIRD PARTY IN
GERMAN
LAW.218
B) THE FAULT REQUIREMENT IN GERMAN
LAW.219
C) EUROPEANISATION OF THE GERMAN LAW OF GOVERNMENTAL
LIABILITY.220
2. THE NATURE OF THE REMEDY IN DOMESTIC LAW - UNITED
KINGDOM.222
3. THE CONDITION OF "SUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS BREACH" IN GERMAN
AND ENGLISH
DECISIONS.223
4. CAUSATION IN MEMBER STATE
LIABILITY.231
A) R V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, EX P GALLAGHER.234
B) GERMANY - BREACH OF PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS AND
CAUSATION.235
IV.
CONCLUSION.241
CHAPTER SIX TRADITION AND CHANGE
.243 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023064700 |
| classification_rvk | PN 980 |
| collection | ZDB-2-SHU |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255429500 (DE-599)DNB981928579 |
| dewey-full | 342.4106 342.4306 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.4106 342.4306 |
| dewey-search | 342.4106 342.4306 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.4106 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02364nmm a2200565 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023064700</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080331 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080103s2007 gw |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">981928579</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783540486886</subfield><subfield code="c">Pp. : EUR 106.95 (freier Pr.)</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-540-48688-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783540486893</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-540-48689-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783540486886</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="028" ind1="5" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">11919414</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255429500</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DNB981928579</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE-BE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.4106</subfield><subfield code="2">22/ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.4306</subfield><subfield code="2">22/ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PN 980</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137857:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="2">sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tradition and change in administrative law</subfield><subfield code="b">an Anglo-German comparison</subfield><subfield code="c">Martina Künnecke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berlin ; Heidelberg ; New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XII, 266 S.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverz. S. 254 - 261</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063351-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063351-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Künnecke, Martina</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">DNB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016267916&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-SHU</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016267916</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-2-SHU</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3</subfield><subfield code="l">UBR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-2-SHU</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-2-SHU</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Großbritannien Deutschland |
| id | DE-604.BV023064700 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T19:30:11Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:10:10Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783540486886 9783540486893 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016267916 |
| oclc_num | 255429500 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 266 S.) |
| psigel | ZDB-2-SHU |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison Martina Künnecke Berlin ; Heidelberg ; New York Springer 2007 1 Online-Ressource (XII, 266 S.) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Literaturverz. S. 254 - 261 Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 g Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g DE-604 Künnecke, Martina Sonstige oth https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 Verlag Volltext DNB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016267916&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4063351-2 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4022153-2 (DE-588)4011882-4 |
| title | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison |
| title_auth | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison |
| title_exact_search | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison |
| title_full | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison Martina Künnecke |
| title_fullStr | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison Martina Künnecke |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tradition and change in administrative law an Anglo-German comparison Martina Künnecke |
| title_short | Tradition and change in administrative law |
| title_sort | tradition and change in administrative law an anglo german comparison |
| title_sub | an Anglo-German comparison |
| topic | Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Verwaltungsrecht Rechtsvergleich Großbritannien Deutschland |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48689-3 http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016267916&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kunneckemartina traditionandchangeinadministrativelawananglogermancomparison |