Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g.:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Bulgarian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[S. l.]
Fondacija "Izvor"
2007
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. izd. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Legitimation of state authority and the 1900 peasant riots |
| Beschreibung: | 338 S. |
| ISBN: | 9789548663021 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023059475 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20120626 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 071220s2007 |||| 00||| bul d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789548663021 |9 978-954-8663-02-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)219435556 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023059475 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bul | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Christov, Todor |d 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)139430423 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. |c Todor Christov |
| 250 | |a 1. izd. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a [S. l.] |b Fondacija "Izvor" |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a 338 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Legitimation of state authority and the 1900 peasant riots | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Soziologie |0 (DE-588)4046558-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Durankulak |x Bauernaufstand |0 (DE-588)7598808-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Bulgarien |0 (DE-588)4008866-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Bulgarien |0 (DE-588)4008866-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Legitimität |0 (DE-588)4035043-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Durankulak |x Bauernaufstand |0 (DE-588)7598808-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Politische Soziologie |0 (DE-588)4046558-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09041 |g 499 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09041 |g 499 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09041 |g 499 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016262732 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1806960653500416000 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ
Въведение
7
Глава първа. ОСНОВНИ СОЦИОЛОГИЧЕСКИ ВЪЗГЛЕДИ ЗА
ЛЕГИТИМНОСТТА
11
§1.
История на понятието
11
§2.
Всекидневното понятие
16
§3.
Легитимност и социално действие (Вебер)
16
§4.
Легитимност и легалност (Шмит)
33
§5.
Легитимност и ефективност (Липсет)
38
§6.
Легитимност и социална система (Парсънс)
42
§7.
Легитимност и комуникативно действие (Хабермас)
55
§8.
Самолегитимирането (Луман)
89
§9.
Големите разкази (Лиотар)
97
§ 10.
Легитимност и символна власт (Бурдийо)
106
§11.
Легитимирането на държавната власт като автономна
дейност
111
§ 12.
Степени на легитимност (Бийтъм)
118
§ 13.
Българската традиция
127
Глава втора. СЕЛСКИТЕ БУНТОВЕ ОТ
1900
Г. КАТО СЛУЧАЙ НА
СОЦИАЛНО НЕДОВОЛСТВО
132
§14.
Българската модернизация
133
§15.
Съпротивата срещу модернизацията
135
§16.
Селото
138
§ 17.
Натуралният десятък
141
§18.
Финансовата криза
150
§19.
Всекидневната война
155
§20.
Политическата обстановка през
1899
г.
159
§21.
Въвеждане на натуралния десятък
163
§22.
Начало на протестите
166
§23.
Методи за организация на протестите
168
§24.
Организационни методи, прилагани от опозиционните
партии
174
§25.
Учредяване на БЗНС
177
§26.
Русенският митинг
181
§27.
Мерките на правителството
185
§28.
Поведението на Фердинанд
188
§29.
Протестите като форма на публичност
190
§30.
Варненският митинг
192
§31.
Митингите в Хасково и Ловеч
196
§32.
Бунтът в Красен
198
§ЗЗ.Тръстенишкиятбунт
201
§34.
Страхът от революция
207
§35.
Дуранкулашкият бунт
210
§36.
Развръзката
214
§37.
Селските бунтове и модернизацията
216
§38.
Проблеми пред модернизационните разкази
218
§39.
Алтернативи на модернизационните разкази
219
Глава трета. СТРАТЕГИИ НА ЛЕГИТИМИРАНЕ НА ДЪРЖАВНАТА
ВЛАСТ
221
Раздел първи. Легитимирането на държавната власт в селските
бунтове от
1900
г.
221
§40.
Перспективата на Вебер
221
§41.
Перспективата на Липсет
223
§42.
Перспективата на Парсънс
225
§43.
Перспективата на Хабермас
227
§44.
Перспективата на Луман
229
§45.
Перспективата на Лиотар
230
§46.
Перспективата на Бурдийо
231
§47.
Перспективата
на Тили
233
§48.
Перспективата на Бийтьм
234
§49.
Проблеми пред стандартните социологически възгледи за
легитимността
236
§50.
Стратегическо и тактическо легитимиране
241
§51.
Легитимирането като езикова игра
243
Раздел втори. Стратегии на легитимиране
249
§52.
Процедура
249
§53.
Стратегии на легитимиране на натуралния десятък
253
§54.
Стратегии, свързани
с
легитимирането на протестите срещу
натуралния десятък
268
§55.
Стратегии на
легитимиране
на
правителствените
мерки
274
§56.
Стратегии,
свързани
с
легитимирането
на
насилието
278
§57.
Стратегии на
легитимиране, свързани
с
народния
суверенитет
281
§58.
Стратегии,
свързани
с
легитимността
на
българската
държава
282
§59.
Стратегически техники
286
§60.
Обобщения
289
Раздел трети. Причини за
неуспешното легитимиране
на
държавната власт
294
§61.
Формулиране на проблема
294
§62.
Всекидневното легитимиране
295
§63.
Всекидневното легитимиране на държавната власт
299
§64.
Черти на случаите на неуспешно легитимиране
304
§65.
Легитимиране чрез цинизъм
305
§66.
Ироничното легитимиране
311
§67.
Обобщение
314
Заключение
318
Библиография
321
Използвани съкращения
334
Summary
335
_335
Toãor
Hristov
Legitimation
of
State
Authority and the
1900
Peasant Riots
(summary)
The book reports the findings of a study on the legitimation
of Bulgarian state authority.
The goal of the study was to explain out the conditions of
possibility of legitimating state authority by examining a case in
which the legitimation failed (and therefore its conditions of
possibility had been violated).
The goal seemed unquestionably important in view of the
widespread belief that the Bulgarian state authority was currently
facing an unclear, inarticulate and persistent discontent. The study
hoped to explain the origin of that discontent and hence the reasons
for the crisis of legitimation Bulgarian postcommunist government
had never outlived.
The study claimed that state authority legitimation failed
because in justifying it political actors breached the sanctioned
background of the common sense everyday settings they acted in.
Since riots are the most obvious examples of failed
legitimation, I decided to study the
1900
peasant riots which
had the advantage of being the first massive outbreak of social
discontent sihce the
reestablishment
of the Bulgarian state in
1878
(and the only one the Bulgarian Communist Party did not
claim to control).
Reading archive accounts of the riots made me realize
that the actors often defined the situation in irreconcilable ways.
Unfortunately, that rendered the conventional sociological theories
of legitimacy inadequate, in view of the fact that they implied a
stable definition what the actual situation was. Therefore I turned
to discursive analysis and historical sociology.
The first chapter of the book, "Sociological Theories of
Legitimacy", describes the genealogy of the notion and the most
important sociological theories of legitimation (Weber, Schmidt,
_336
Lipset, Parsons,
Offe,
Habermas,
Luhman,
Lyotard, Bourdieu,
Stinchcombe,
Tilly, Scockpol
and Beetham).
The second chapter, "The
1900
Peasant Riots", describes
the story of the peasant riots. Narrating the riots however
met a serious problem since actors described the events in
diverging, often conflicting ways, and tended to construe them as
ambiguous, unclear, shaped by their intentions, fears, knowledge,
apprehension, desire, negotiations, representations and therefore
unavoidably volatile). The conventional approaches eluded that
problem by recasting the story of the peasant riots in the language
of modernization, and hence by trimming down the ambiguities,
contradictions, and disseminations, as well as by claiming the
standpoint of the objective observer. This allegedly objective
standpoint proved though to be inadequate for the only perspective
one could hope to explain the legitimation failure was not the one
of the sociological bystander or the government, but rather the
one of the rebels. So the second chapter had also to advocate an
alternative solution to the problem: rejecting the modernization
grand narrative, and
-
instead of downplaying the ambiguities
-
telling the story from as many different points of view as possible.
The third chapter, "Strategies for Legitimating State
Authority", is aimed at explaining the failed legitimation of state
authority in the context of the
1900
peasant riots. The first section
of the chapter makes an attempt at describing that failure through
the lenses of the conventional sociological theories reviewed in
chapter
1.
The conventional descriptions however turned out to be
inadequate as they were invented for explaining strategic actions,
and in the case of the peasant riots state authority met not strategic
but tactical resistance. Hence the next section of the chapter
tried to develop a model of legitimation able to explain tactical
actions and to assess their achievements and failures. Developing
that model however did not imply censuring the conventional
theories or formulating an alternative theory. It required only the
elaboration of the conventional theories into a model appropriate
for analyzing everyday life scenes. So the section proposed a model
of legitimation as a language game, and used it in order to develop
an appropriate theoretical framework adequate to the task of
describing the legitimation methods employed by the actors both
against and in favor of the government.
The examination of the legitimation strategies invited several
_337
surprising conclusions: there turned out to be neither successful
nor unsuccessful strategies in themselves; the political actors
preferred strategies aimed at shrinking the political public sphere
which in turn made it possible to construe the riots as a resistance
against the shrinking (or in other words
-
as attempts at raising
political claims excluded or even prohibited from the political
discourse).
The findings showed that state authority legitimation failed
not because of the strategies it used but rather because of the way
it used them. By comparing cases of successful and unsuccessful
legitimation,
1
came to the conclusion that the legitimation
strategies failed if being used in a manner breaching the sanctioned
background of the everyday settings legitimation took place in.
In the third section of chapter
3,
I tried to explain the
nature of that common sense background and the motives and
methods for violating it. I tried to account for the sanctioned nature
of the background by leaning on the theoretical framework of
ethnomethodology. The peasant riot situations however diverged
from the ones described in the ethnomethodological literature
because actors tended to treat significant features of the
background not as certain but rather as not-uncertain (i.e. nor as
certain neither as uncertain). The ethnomethodological procedures
turned out inapplicable to such situations unless interpreted in a
weaker sense.
Analyzing the infringements on the sanctioned background
expectations, beliefs, or knowledge enabled me to define a
crucial method for legitimating state authority that I called cynical
legitimation. That in turn made it possible to describe the practical
methods for undermining cynical legitimation as well as the
circumstances of its failure.
Studying the practical methods suggested the paradoxical
conclusion that the legitimation crisis suffered by the state
authority was in fact a method for legitimation, and so state
authority legitimation was split or double-sided in a way (one could
say that legitimating state authority through cynicism made it both
legitimate from a strategic point of view and illegitimate from an
everyday point of view). That conclusion required an explanation
why political actors preferred such a self-destructive legitimation
strategy and why did it fail in the case of the peasant riots. The
explanation, based on a notion of the state power as an everyday
_
338_
war (in the sense of
Foucault),
enabled me to put the peasant riots
in the broader context of governmentality.
Let me note in conclusion that in my opinion the legitima¬
tion strategies and problems described in the study are still trou¬
bling the Bulgarian governance, possibly more than ever; one can
easily detect their versions in the contemporary political discourse
as well as in the persistent and inarticulate discontent with the
government. |
| adam_txt |
СЪДЪРЖАНИЕ
Въведение
7
Глава първа. ОСНОВНИ СОЦИОЛОГИЧЕСКИ ВЪЗГЛЕДИ ЗА
ЛЕГИТИМНОСТТА
11
§1.
История на понятието
11
§2.
Всекидневното понятие
16
§3.
Легитимност и социално действие (Вебер)
16
§4.
Легитимност и легалност (Шмит)
33
§5.
Легитимност и ефективност (Липсет)
38
§6.
Легитимност и социална система (Парсънс)
42
§7.
Легитимност и комуникативно действие (Хабермас)
55
§8.
Самолегитимирането (Луман)
89
§9.
Големите разкази (Лиотар)
97
§ 10.
Легитимност и символна власт (Бурдийо)
106
§11.
Легитимирането на държавната власт като автономна
дейност
111
§ 12.
Степени на легитимност (Бийтъм)
118
§ 13.
Българската традиция
127
Глава втора. СЕЛСКИТЕ БУНТОВЕ ОТ
1900
Г. КАТО СЛУЧАЙ НА
СОЦИАЛНО НЕДОВОЛСТВО
132
§14.
Българската модернизация
133
§15.
Съпротивата срещу модернизацията
135
§16.
Селото
138
§ 17.
Натуралният десятък
141
§18.
Финансовата криза
150
§19.
Всекидневната война
155
§20.
Политическата обстановка през
1899
г.
159
§21.
Въвеждане на натуралния десятък
163
§22.
Начало на протестите
166
§23.
Методи за организация на протестите
168
§24.
Организационни методи, прилагани от опозиционните
партии
174
§25.
Учредяване на БЗНС
177
§26.
Русенският митинг
181
§27.
Мерките на правителството
185
§28.
Поведението на Фердинанд
188
§29.
Протестите като форма на публичност
190
§30.
Варненският митинг
192
§31.
Митингите в Хасково и Ловеч
196
§32.
Бунтът в Красен
198
§ЗЗ.Тръстенишкиятбунт
201
§34.
Страхът от революция
207
§35.
Дуранкулашкият бунт
210
§36.
Развръзката
214
§37.
Селските бунтове и модернизацията
216
§38.
Проблеми пред модернизационните разкази
218
§39.
Алтернативи на модернизационните разкази
219
Глава трета. СТРАТЕГИИ НА ЛЕГИТИМИРАНЕ НА ДЪРЖАВНАТА
ВЛАСТ
221
Раздел първи. Легитимирането на държавната власт в селските
бунтове от
1900
г.
221
§40.
Перспективата на Вебер
221
§41.
Перспективата на Липсет
223
§42.
Перспективата на Парсънс
225
§43.
Перспективата на Хабермас
227
§44.
Перспективата на Луман
229
§45.
Перспективата на Лиотар
230
§46.
Перспективата на Бурдийо
231
§47.
Перспективата
на Тили
233
§48.
Перспективата на Бийтьм
234
§49.
Проблеми пред стандартните социологически възгледи за
легитимността
236
§50.
Стратегическо и тактическо легитимиране
241
§51.
Легитимирането като езикова игра
243
Раздел втори. Стратегии на легитимиране
249
§52.
Процедура
249
§53.
Стратегии на легитимиране на натуралния десятък
253
§54.
Стратегии, свързани
с
легитимирането на протестите срещу
натуралния десятък
268
§55.
Стратегии на
легитимиране
на
правителствените
мерки
274
§56.
Стратегии,
свързани
с
легитимирането
на
насилието
278
§57.
Стратегии на
легитимиране, свързани
с
народния
суверенитет
281
§58.
Стратегии,
свързани
с
легитимността
на
българската
държава
282
§59.
Стратегически техники
286
§60.
Обобщения
289
Раздел трети. Причини за
неуспешното легитимиране
на
държавната власт
294
§61.
Формулиране на проблема
294
§62.
Всекидневното легитимиране
295
§63.
Всекидневното легитимиране на държавната власт
299
§64.
Черти на случаите на неуспешно легитимиране
304
§65.
Легитимиране чрез цинизъм
305
§66.
Ироничното легитимиране
311
§67.
Обобщение
314
Заключение
318
Библиография
321
Използвани съкращения
334
Summary
335
_335
Toãor
Hristov
Legitimation
of
State
Authority and the
1900
Peasant Riots
(summary)
The book reports the findings of a study on the legitimation
of Bulgarian state authority.
The goal of the study was to explain out the conditions of
possibility of legitimating state authority by examining a case in
which the legitimation failed (and therefore its conditions of
possibility had been violated).
The goal seemed unquestionably important in view of the
widespread belief that the Bulgarian state authority was currently
facing an unclear, inarticulate and persistent discontent. The study
hoped to explain the origin of that discontent and hence the reasons
for the crisis of legitimation Bulgarian postcommunist government
had never outlived.
The study claimed that state authority legitimation failed
because in justifying it political actors breached the sanctioned
background of the common sense everyday settings they acted in.
Since riots are the most obvious examples of failed
legitimation, I decided to study the
1900
peasant riots which
had the advantage of being the first massive outbreak of social
discontent sihce the
reestablishment
of the Bulgarian state in
1878
(and the only one the Bulgarian Communist Party did not
claim to control).
Reading archive accounts of the riots made me realize
that the actors often defined the situation in irreconcilable ways.
Unfortunately, that rendered the conventional sociological theories
of legitimacy inadequate, in view of the fact that they implied a
stable definition what the actual situation was. Therefore I turned
to discursive analysis and historical sociology.
The first chapter of the book, "Sociological Theories of
Legitimacy", describes the genealogy of the notion and the most
important sociological theories of legitimation (Weber, Schmidt,
_336
Lipset, Parsons,
Offe,
Habermas,
Luhman,
Lyotard, Bourdieu,
Stinchcombe,
Tilly, Scockpol
and Beetham).
The second chapter, "The
1900
Peasant Riots", describes
the story of the peasant riots. Narrating the riots however
met a serious problem since actors described the events in
diverging, often conflicting ways, and tended to construe them as
ambiguous, unclear, shaped by their intentions, fears, knowledge,
apprehension, desire, negotiations, representations and therefore
unavoidably volatile). The conventional approaches eluded that
problem by recasting the story of the peasant riots in the language
of modernization, and hence by trimming down the ambiguities,
contradictions, and disseminations, as well as by claiming the
standpoint of the objective observer. This allegedly objective
standpoint proved though to be inadequate for the only perspective
one could hope to explain the legitimation failure was not the one
of the sociological bystander or the government, but rather the
one of the rebels. So the second chapter had also to advocate an
alternative solution to the problem: rejecting the modernization
grand narrative, and
-
instead of downplaying the ambiguities
-
telling the story from as many different points of view as possible.
The third chapter, "Strategies for Legitimating State
Authority", is aimed at explaining the failed legitimation of state
authority in the context of the
1900
peasant riots. The first section
of the chapter makes an attempt at describing that failure through
the lenses of the conventional sociological theories reviewed in
chapter
1.
The conventional descriptions however turned out to be
inadequate as they were invented for explaining strategic actions,
and in the case of the peasant riots state authority met not strategic
but tactical resistance. Hence the next section of the chapter
tried to develop a model of legitimation able to explain tactical
actions and to assess their achievements and failures. Developing
that model however did not imply censuring the conventional
theories or formulating an alternative theory. It required only the
elaboration of the conventional theories into a model appropriate
for analyzing everyday life scenes. So the section proposed a model
of legitimation as a language game, and used it in order to develop
an appropriate theoretical framework adequate to the task of
describing the legitimation methods employed by the actors both
against and in favor of the government.
The examination of the legitimation strategies invited several
_337
surprising conclusions: there turned out to be neither successful
nor unsuccessful strategies in themselves; the political actors
preferred strategies aimed at shrinking the political public sphere
which in turn made it possible to construe the riots as a resistance
against the shrinking (or in other words
-
as attempts at raising
political claims excluded or even prohibited from the political
discourse).
The findings showed that state authority legitimation failed
not because of the strategies it used but rather because of the way
it used them. By comparing cases of successful and unsuccessful
legitimation,
1
came to the conclusion that the legitimation
strategies failed if being used in a manner breaching the sanctioned
background of the everyday settings legitimation took place in.
In the third section of chapter
3,
I tried to explain the
nature of that common sense background and the motives and
methods for violating it. I tried to account for the sanctioned nature
of the background by leaning on the theoretical framework of
ethnomethodology. The peasant riot situations however diverged
from the ones described in the ethnomethodological literature
because actors tended to treat significant features of the
background not as certain but rather as not-uncertain (i.e. nor as
certain neither as uncertain). The ethnomethodological procedures
turned out inapplicable to such situations unless interpreted in a
weaker sense.
Analyzing the infringements on the sanctioned background
expectations, beliefs, or knowledge enabled me to define a
crucial method for legitimating state authority that I called cynical
legitimation. That in turn made it possible to describe the practical
methods for undermining cynical legitimation as well as the
circumstances of its failure.
Studying the practical methods suggested the paradoxical
conclusion that the legitimation crisis suffered by the state
authority was in fact a method for legitimation, and so state
authority legitimation was split or double-sided in a way (one could
say that legitimating state authority through cynicism made it both
legitimate from a strategic point of view and illegitimate from an
everyday point of view). That conclusion required an explanation
why political actors preferred such a self-destructive legitimation
strategy and why did it fail in the case of the peasant riots. The
explanation, based on a notion of the state power as an everyday
_
338_
war (in the sense of
Foucault),
enabled me to put the peasant riots
in the broader context of governmentality.
Let me note in conclusion that in my opinion the legitima¬
tion strategies and problems described in the study are still trou¬
bling the Bulgarian governance, possibly more than ever; one can
easily detect their versions in the contemporary political discourse
as well as in the persistent and inarticulate discontent with the
government. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Christov, Todor 20./21. Jh |
| author_GND | (DE-588)139430423 |
| author_facet | Christov, Todor 20./21. Jh |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Christov, Todor 20./21. Jh |
| author_variant | t c tc |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023059475 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)219435556 (DE-599)BVBBV023059475 |
| edition | 1. izd. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023059475</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20120626</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">071220s2007 |||| 00||| bul d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789548663021</subfield><subfield code="9">978-954-8663-02-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)219435556</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023059475</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bul</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Christov, Todor</subfield><subfield code="d">20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)139430423</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g.</subfield><subfield code="c">Todor Christov</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. izd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[S. l.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija "Izvor"</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">338 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Legitimation of state authority and the 1900 peasant riots</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Soziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046558-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Durankulak</subfield><subfield code="x">Bauernaufstand</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7598808-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bulgarien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4008866-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bulgarien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4008866-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Legitimität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4035043-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Durankulak</subfield><subfield code="x">Bauernaufstand</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7598808-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Politische Soziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046558-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09041</subfield><subfield code="g">499</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09041</subfield><subfield code="g">499</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09041</subfield><subfield code="g">499</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016262732</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Bulgarien (DE-588)4008866-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Bulgarien |
| id | DE-604.BV023059475 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T19:28:11Z |
| indexdate | 2024-08-10T01:06:05Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789548663021 |
| language | Bulgarian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016262732 |
| oclc_num | 219435556 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 338 S. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Fondacija "Izvor" |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Christov, Todor 20./21. Jh. Verfasser (DE-588)139430423 aut Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. Todor Christov 1. izd. [S. l.] Fondacija "Izvor" 2007 338 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In kyrill. Schr., bulg. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Legitimation of state authority and the 1900 peasant riots Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd rswk-swf Politische Soziologie (DE-588)4046558-5 gnd rswk-swf Durankulak Bauernaufstand (DE-588)7598808-2 gnd rswk-swf Bulgarien (DE-588)4008866-2 gnd rswk-swf Bulgarien (DE-588)4008866-2 g Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 s Durankulak Bauernaufstand (DE-588)7598808-2 s Politische Soziologie (DE-588)4046558-5 s DE-604 Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Christov, Todor 20./21. Jh Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Politische Soziologie (DE-588)4046558-5 gnd Durankulak Bauernaufstand (DE-588)7598808-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4035043-5 (DE-588)4046558-5 (DE-588)7598808-2 (DE-588)4008866-2 |
| title | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. |
| title_auth | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. |
| title_exact_search | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. |
| title_full | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. Todor Christov |
| title_fullStr | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. Todor Christov |
| title_full_unstemmed | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. Todor Christov |
| title_short | Legitimiraneto na dăržavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g. |
| title_sort | legitimiraneto na darzavnata vlast i selskite buntove ot 1900 g |
| topic | Legitimität (DE-588)4035043-5 gnd Politische Soziologie (DE-588)4046558-5 gnd Durankulak Bauernaufstand (DE-588)7598808-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Legitimität Politische Soziologie Durankulak Bauernaufstand Bulgarien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016262732&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christovtodor legitimiranetonadarzavnatavlastiselskitebuntoveot1900g |