Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Zenica
Dom Štampe
2004
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | 324 S. Ill., Kt., graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9958421216 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023031604 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20080103 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 071203s2004 abd| |||| 00||| bos d | ||
| 020 | |a 9958421216 |9 9958-42-121-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)643081120 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023031604 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Najetović, Džemal |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine |c Džemal Najetović |
| 264 | 1 | |a Zenica |b Dom Štampe |c 2004 | |
| 300 | |a 324 S. |b Ill., Kt., graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Geopolitik |0 (DE-588)4156741-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Sarajevo |z Region |0 (DE-588)7521480-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Bosnien-Herzegowina |0 (DE-588)4088119-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Zenica |z Region |0 (DE-588)7598061-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Bosnien |0 (DE-588)4007826-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Bosnien |0 (DE-588)4007826-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Geopolitik |0 (DE-588)4156741-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Bosnien-Herzegowina |0 (DE-588)4088119-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Zenica |z Region |0 (DE-588)7598061-7 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Geopolitik |0 (DE-588)4156741-9 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Bosnien-Herzegowina |0 (DE-588)4088119-2 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Sarajevo |z Region |0 (DE-588)7521480-5 |D g |
| 689 | 2 | 1 | |a Geopolitik |0 (DE-588)4156741-9 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 2 | |a Bosnien-Herzegowina |0 (DE-588)4088119-2 |D g |
| 689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016235473 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137256486699008 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | SADRŽAJ
UVOD
.................................5
TEORIJSKO
OBJAŠNJENJE
OSNOVNIH POJMOVA
.... 11
I.
DIO
GEOPOLITIČKI ZNAČAJ SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE
REGIJE
1.
GEOGRAFSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
...........39
1.1.
Geografski položaj i granice
................39
1.2.
Reljef i površina
. ......................41
1.3.
Klima
............................44
1.4.
Hidrografija
.........................44
1.5.
Pošumljenost
........................46
2.
DEMOGRAFSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
...........47
2.1.
Stanovništvo
.........................47
2.2.
Struktura stanovništva prema popisu iz
aprila
1991.
g
.........................52
2.3.
Migracije stanovništva
...................55
3.
POLITIČKI ZNAČAJ SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE
REGIJE
...........................62
3.1.
Položaj regije u historiji
ВІН
................62
3.2.
Kontinuitet razvoja državne i političke vlasti
........96
3.2.1.
Bosanski državni stanak-Sabor
..............114
3.2.2.
Raspisivanje i sprovođenje Referenduma
1992.
godine
........................116
3.3.
Geneza političkog
organizo
vanj a na
području regije
.......................118
321
SADRŽAJ
II.
DIO
PRIVREDNE, SOCIJALNE, OBRAZOVNE I
KULTUROLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
1.
PRIVREDA
........................139
1.1.
Industrija
.......................... 148
1.2.
Energetika
......................... 152
1.3.
Rudarstvo
......................... 153
1.4.
Mala privreda i zanatstvo
................. 154
2.
SAOBRAĆAJ
....................... 156
2.1.
Putni saobraćaj
....................... 156
2.2.
Željeznički saobraćaj
................... 163
2.3.
Zračni saobraćaj
...................... 164
2.4.
Sistem veza i telekomunikacija
.............. 164
3.
POLJOPRIVREDA, STOČARSTVO,
VETERINARSTVO, ŠUMARSTVO I
VODOPRIVREDA
....................166
3.1.
Poljoprivreda
........................ 166
3.2.
Stočarstvo
......................... 167
3.3.
Veterinarstvo
........................ 168
3.4.
Šumarstvo
......................... 169
3.5.
Vodoprivreda
....................... 169
4.
NASELJA, URBANIZAMJ STAMBENI I
KOMUNALNI POSLOVI I GRAĐEVINARSTVO
. .171
4.1.
Naselja
...........................171
4.2.
Urbanizam, stambeni i komunalni poslovi
........175
4.3.
Građevinarstvo
.......................178
5.
ZDRAVSTVO I SOCIJALNA ZAŠTITA
.......180
5.1.
Zdravstvo
.........................180
5.2.
Socijalna zaštita
......................184
6.
NAUKA, OBRAZOVANJE, KULTURA I SPORT
. . 187
6.1.
Nauka i obrazovanje
....................187
6.2.
Kultura
...........................193
6.3.
Sport
............................196
322
Džema! NAJETOVIĆ
7.
INFORMATIVNA DJELATNOST
........... 198
7.1.
Radio-difuzna i televizijska mreža
............. 198
7.2.
Novinsko-izdavačka djelatnost
.............. 199
7.3.
Filmska djelatnost
..................... 199
8.
UPRAVA, PRAVOSUĐE I IZVRŠENJE
KRIVIČNIH SANKCIJA
................201
III DIO
ZNAČAJ SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE IVO
ЛЅТА
CENTRALNA BOSNA ZA OČUVANJE
TERITORIJALNOG INTEGRITETA I SUVERENITETA
BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
1.
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKA REGIJA U RATOVIMA
ZA I OKO BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
.........205
1.1.
Vojne prilike u Sarajevsko-zeničkoj regiji od
antičkog doba do početka
XX
st
..............205
1.2.
Vojne prilike u Sarajevsko-zeničkoj regiji u
prvoj polovini
XX
st
....................213
1.3.
Sarajevsko-zenička regija u ratu
1992.
do
1995.
godine
........................218
2.
GEOSTRATEGIJSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
BOSANSKOHERCEGOVAČKOG RATIŠTA
.... 235
2.1.
Veličina, oblik i granice bosanskohercegovačkog
ratišta
............................235
2.2.
Geografske i hidrografske karakteristike
bosanskohercegovačkog ratišta
..............236
2.3.
Geostrategijski položaj bosanskohercegovačkog
ratišta u odnosu na zapadni Balkan, jugoistočnu
Evropu, Južnoevropsko i Centralnoevropsko
vojište
...........................238
2.4.
Smisao i značaj vojno-teritorijalne podjele
ВІН
.....241
2.5.
Moguća vojišta (geostrategijske cjeline)
bosanskohercegovačkog ratišta
..............242
3.
GEOSTRATEGIJSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
..........247
3.1.
Geostrategijski položaj Šarajevsko-zeničke regije
.... 247
323
SADRŽAJ
3.2.
Geostrategijske karakteristike mogućih pravaca
dejstva
agresora na područje Sarajevsko-zeničke
regije
............................248
3.3.
Geostrategijski značaj Sarajevsko-zeničke
regije u vojištu Centralna Bosna
..............250
ZAKLJUČNA RAZMATRANJA
................257
SUMMARY
............................265
BIBLIOGRAFIJA
........................273
PRILOZI
.............................295
INDEKS LIČNIH IMENA
...................304
RECENZIJE
...........................312
SADRŽAJ
.............................321
324
f
_. Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek
München
SUMMARY
This study covers basic characteristics related to geopolitical
importance of Sarajevo-Zenica region (SZ) as area with determined
strategic, political and military influence in sustainability and sovereignty
of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
From the perspective of natural and human resources and their
interconnection with social processes, SZ region is considered as central
territory of BH. Such geographic position represents nucleus of BH
geo-strategic area. The most populated areas in this region are valleys and
river valleys. Tendency of continuous population density in narrow river
valleys, specially by river Bosnia which is most populated area of
ВІН
might result to complete jam by infrastructure, industrial and working
zones. Therefore, this trend should be stopped and population density
should be directed to hills.
Romans had started building urban settlements in this area. Population
settlements, among communications were in function of travel stations.
Coalmines and sources of thermal and mineral water had also been often
surrounding of these settlements. Beside that, first administrative centres
were established. First residents of these centres were soldiers, officers and
traders accompanied thereafter by local population (upon approval of their
Roman citizenship). Each Roman town had central square, town hall, court
building, streets, public rest room, central heating, water pipelines and
sewerage system. From its establishment up to date, SZ region went
through various state and political government organisation. This region
was hardly ever politically isolated and it was often governed by
foreigners; starting by Poblije Kornelije Dolabelo (X century A.C) up to
present High Representative Paddy Ashdown.
SZ region has solid resources of coal,
förrest,
water power potentials
etc, which is of vital importance for realisation of BH development
concept.
Majority of basic and energy capacities are already developed by main
regional motorway corridor
5
С
and those are: capacities for metal works in
265
SUMMARY
Zenica
and
Hijas,
coal production in
Zenica,
Kakanj and
Breza
as well as
steam power plant in
Čatići.
SZ
region almost matches the area of medieval Bosnian state which is
characterised by: high level of independence, developed trading and
economic relations with neighbourhood, establishment of settlements and
first towns in accordance with European standards. This long-lasting
period of internal peace and consolidation resulted to introduction of own
currency, organisation of internal relations and establishment of strong
state institutions such as Parliament etc.
Among bogumils,
ortodox
and chatolic communities, community of
Islamic population was also established. They all have Slavic origin,
similar language and many similarities in culture, lifestyle, mentality etc.
During Ottoman Empire, SZ region was part of Sarajevo Sanjak
(administrative division), which after became Bosnian
pašaluk
(mode of
governing).
Social organisation was based on strong central government with
military character. Basic military-administrative unit was
vilajet
that was
composed by number of districts and municipalities. All the time, during
Ottoman governing, SZ region was on borderline. At the beginning, it was
initial base for further conquering and later it served as rampart during
defence from Austro-Hungary and
Mletačka Republika.
Since Austro-Hungarian occupation
1878-1908,
this area was under
formal sovereignty of Sultan while actual governing approved by Europe
and Turkey belonged to Austro-Hungary. By annexation
1908
Austro-Hungary illegitimately violated Berlin agreement and took over
sovereignty over BH by paying to
Türkey 2,5
millions of
GB
Pounds.
Despite of its own Constitution and Parliament, BH was not entitled to
establish its laws independently. During Austro-Hungarian governing,
they legal system was also applied on BH.
Based on Article
135
of
Vidovdan
Constitution
1921
BH managed to
maintain territorial integrity within its historical borders. All the time until
establishment of central governing
1929,
BH had elements of autonomous
government with headquarter in Sarajevo and
6
regional administrative
branches. During same year, for very first time since
1463,
king Alexander
broke territorial integrity of BH when he divided BH on
4
parts
-banovine
(ban-leader). Purpose of this division was to make sure that Bosniacs are
not majority in any of
banovina.
In July
1941,
in SZ region was established
Ustaša
governing
-
so called
Independent State of Croatia (NDH). Beside municipalities and counties as
266
Dźemal
NAJETOVIĆ
higher administrative-governing units, there were also districts. As a result
of participation of all ethnics groups in world war II
1941-1945,
after
480
years, on
25
November
1943
in
Vrcar Vakuf (Mrkonjić Grad)
at first
session of ZAVNOBiH, BH renewed its sovereignty and on second session
of
AVNOJ (Anti
fascists Council of national deliberation of Yugoslavia)
on
29
November
1943
in town
Jajce,
representatives of all three BH ethnic
groups endorsed decision of ZAVNOBIH which declares
ВІН
as one of six
federal equal units of future Democratic Federal Yugoslavia.
State and governing law composed socialist legal system. As per law on
peoples committees, BH was divided on districts: Sarajevo,Travnik,
Banjaluka, Doboj, Bihać
and
Tuzla.
At that time, SZ region was mostly
covered by Sarajevo and
Travnik
district. This division lasted until
1952
when territorial division of BH was introduced. This territorial division
divided BH on municipalities and districts. During seventies, division was
reduced only on municipalities with
7
newly established economical
regions (chamber of commerce), which was almost equal to division
1946
on districts that represented territorial-administrative units. Citizens of SZ
regions were accomplishing their interests through delegations and
delegates and that system was reflection of political system
ofthat
time.
In relation to political-administrative division of that time, Prof. Dr.
Omer
Ibrahimagić
had proposed formation of
4
regions and stated: That is
why I believe that concept is consisted in Platform of Presidency to divide
BH on
4
regions: Sarajevo,
Banjaluka, Tuzla
and
Mostar
with possibility of
establishment of new regions based on their historical origin where modern
European criteria will be applied for political-administrative division of
our state .514
Regionalisation
of BH requires special focus on macro-economic policy
problems. That is new factor of
regionalisation.
At present time, regions are
not and cannot be solely territorial units responsible for directing economic
development. They should have administrative, political, economic and
defence functions and from the other hand, that raises the issue about
division of government and especially macro-economic policy. In regional
research, issue of macro-economic policy was hardly ever raised. This
514
Omer
Ibrahimagić:
Bosnia and Bosniacs-state and people that had been supposed
to disappear , Published by:
Svjetlost,
Sarajevo
1996,
page
19
In this publication,
on page
18-22
there is writer s article titled Autonomy of SZ region which was
also later on published in the newspaper
Muslimanski
list on
21
September
1992
1
am referring to this publication because I want to express my gratitude to author for
using scientific argumentations and for actualising historical continuity of state
organisation of BH.
267
SUMMARY
study could not go further in this direction because transition of economic
system through privatisation process is still not completed and there is luck
of data about war damage, which affected economy, and therefore, any
deeper analyses at current time will be pure improvisation.
Basic characteristic of political parties organisation in SZ region is
reflecting confessional structure of their population. In other words,
distinct social division of population by religion had predominant role in
formation of political parties and organisations. Political activity of
population in SZ region emerged together with raise of national affiliation,
based on religion tradition.
As central Bosnian mining and highlands points, SZ region was through
the centuries subject of neighbour s aspirations and for that reason, there
were about
200
conquests on same. SZ region can contribute with its power
in enabling BH to become, for its neighbours, in terms of territory forever
lost area.
Conquered area Romans had pacified by strong measures, by displacing
population, by land confiscation and by recruitments. They also imposed
mandatory military service out of Bosnia that lasted
30
years. Romans built
numbers of military fortresses and road communications that served as
shortcut
-
gateway to
Panonija
and Danube Basin.
During medieval, there were numerous forms of warfare in SZ region. If
we take a closer insight in this wars, we can find out that population of
medieval Bosnian state defended their freedom and conclude that these
wars, as per standard classification of wars had defending character.
Warfare during medieval had strengthen power of military and feudal
decision makers and had huge influence in enforcement of state institutions
and
fédéralisation
process. All the time until political brake down, army
was a bunch of feudal military units supported by central government.
During Ottoman Empire, these region had specific military organisation
made of: landowners, provincial cavalry,
Krajina
servants, border guards,
local forces and local military forces. At the beginning of Ottoman
governing in Bosnia, there were also janissaries. Their main detachments
were in Sarajevo and Vranduk. During Ottoman Empire, in Bosnian
Pašaluk,
it was possible to mobilise about
60 000
soldiers for mobilisation.
All of them were getting salaries in money.
Austro-Hungarian troops occupied BH between
29
July
-20
October
1878
by braking down great resistance showed by Muslim population.
After occupation, Austro-Hungary kept
6
divisions with about
50 000
soldiers in BH. Apart from regular army, in September
1878,
another
2
268
Džemal NAJETO
VIĆ
Corps was established;
Serežanski
(Gendarmerie) with
3.091
members and
Pandurski
(Police) with
952
repatriated Herzegovina rebels.
In addition, there was also police establishment with
338
guards. During
Austro-Hungarian government, this area was divided on
4
military districts
with headquarters in Sarajevo,
Banja Luka, Tuzla
and
Mostar
with first
companies composed by BH personnel. First company was formed in
Sarajevo. Since
1883,
SZ region belonged to IS district Corp.
During Kingdom of Serbs Croats and Slovenians (SHS), SZ region was
part of
Drina banovina
(regional division) in zone of responsibility of
second army.
There is very interesting Protocol agreement written in that time
between Yugoslavian Muslim club and government of Nikola
Pašić,
where
point
9
states following: misconducts of individuals in army, schools, and
other official services directed towards offence of religion will be subject
of strict punishment and they would particularly be no force imposed on
Muslim soldiers during church-confessional ceremonies .
1941,
when the war broke out, Bosnians were exposed to great
temptation. While NDH tried to manipulate with them and use them for
their objectives, from the other side they were exposed to dreadful
genocide from chetnics. Bosnians adopted number of resolutions in the
autumn
1941
and dissociated themselves from Ustacha s policy and
genocide on Serbs, Jews and Romans and condemned those from their
population who participated in such crime. From the very beginning of
rebellion, some Bosniacs joined partisan units. Trend of massive entry of
Bosniacs into National deliberation Army
(NOV)
happened in the autumn
1943
and they gave tremendous contribution to anti-fascist battle that later
on developed modern democratic Europe.
After dissolution of former
SFR
Yugoslavia, SR Yugoslavia and
Republic of Croatia had expressed territorial claims towards
ВІН.
Aggression on
ВІН
was prepared and conducted together with wars in
SFRY area with objective of capturing, moving borders and formation of
Great Serbia and Great Croatia by sacrifice of BH.
During recent war, region of SZ was surrounded and partially captured
by forces of
Republika Srpska
and
HVO
(Croat Defence Council).
Sarajevo was under siege for
1.100
days. Despite that, SZ region still
represented operative-strategic intact in usage of forces and defence of
land as well as in modest logistic support of almost entire Army of RBH.
From the perspective of its role and position in warfare, operative-strategic
position, deployment of armed forces and economic potential, SZ region
269
SUMMARY
had most important role in defence of territorial and political integrity of
ВІН.
Political and military importance of SZ region lays on fact that this
territory was successfully defended in previous war as base of BH defence.
This region was operative-strategic area that accommodated most
important state institutions such as: Presidency, Government, GS of AF,
main Army logistic centre etc. As per its geo-strategic position and overall
economic and military potentials, SZ region was a central BH battlefield in
recent war.
Geo-strategic position of BH battlefield is based on BH position in
Balkans, Europe and World. Important characteristic of its geo-strategic
position is the fact that territory of
ВІН
with Republic of Croatia divides
armed forces of NATO Alliance from other states of South-eastern Europe
willing to join NATO Alliance. These elements are having direct influence
on position and relations of BH with its neighbours, NATO Alliance and its
partners. Establishment of security policy of BH should be based on these
facts and comply with security system of
EU
and internationally. This is
particularly specific because of geo-strategic position of BH Theater,
which is, comparing to Western Balkans, South-East Europe, South
European and Central European Theater more important. Europe covers
central position ashore hemisphere and has good connections with Asia,
Africa, America and therefore, great influence on course of happenings in
the world.
Geographic, historical, economic, cultural and other conditions in BH
had influenced separation of
4
battlefields
-
geo-strategic units differing
one from another. Those are: battlefield
Bosanska krajina
or Banjaluka-
-Bihać
region (it can also be called Southwest Bosnia), battlefield Central
Bosnia or Sarajevo-Zenica region, battlefield North-East Bosnia or
Tuzla-Doboj region and battlefield Herzegovina or Mostar-Trebinje
region. Their borders are mainly defined by physical-geographic elements
and they do not match with entity borders, canton etc. In this study, it is
explained why there are
4
and no more battlefields. It is also stated that
proposed division enables establishment of smaller regions within each
mentioned big region. This proposal of military-territorial division is not
final; there is still possibility of further research of regional organisation of
BH not only for defence purpose but more efficient social-economic
system. Regional development should be based on overall development. In
addition to that, as per additional requirements, each region should have
basic economic, development, demographic and other potentials necessary
for mutual cooperation and coordination of global development, security
and defence.
270
Džemal NAJETOVIĆ
Proposed military-territorial division of
BH
theatre provides reasonable
base for security requirements and defence from possible aggression and
from the other hand, this proposal is close to real area organisation of basic
activities of society (economy, education, health etc.) and therefore, it is
realistic, dynamic, adjustable and applicable in regional policy. This
proposal is a link between previous researches and given proposal of
division on geo-strategic units, which is great challenge for scientific work
to contribute in finding optimal solution for territorial division of BH.
If we study geo-strategic position and importance of theater of Central
Bosnia, in context of modern military-political situation in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Balkans and Europe and if we keep in mind historical
interests for this region, we come to conclusion that geo-strategic position
of this region is very complex and more important than size of its territory.
That is geographic area that would have great strategic advantage and
important influence on physical unity of BH theater.
All efforts up to date related to division of BH state territory have
fulfilled its primary function by offering various models of its
administrative-territorial division. However, despite of principal support to
these proposals with no doubt on relevancy of criteria (economic-de¬
velopment, area-geographic, demographic-structural, infrastructure-
communication, urban-gravity, historic-traditional, ethnic-confessional);
there is still marginal objection due to luck of defence-security criteria.
Basic weakness of up to date divisions lays on fact that there is still no
proper regional division as unique issue of political, economic and military
importance. In this context, SZ region, as part of state territory that
represents circled entirety of possible defence in case of aggression is not
defined in terms of military-strategy. In present divisions, there are only
economic and social aspects while the military one is left aside. However,
the most acceptable solution would be to match military-territorial division
with political-administrative structure of the state. This study as well as
earlier researches is showing that division of regions cannot be done
unfounded act based on political will but rational action based on exact
research procedure. In further regional structuring, politics should make
balance between state and regions and enable optimal functioning of
overall social-political system. We need to achieve politics able to provide
security and stability of social-political, economic and military system BH
and enable dynamics of economy development. This research should not
be considered as final. It opens certain issues that can be subject of further
research. This study however covers solid research that should be
supplemented by results of further research. If there is still some ground for
271
SUMMARY
complaints, I am convinced that it will not affect the essence of this study;
it will just be attempt to for some upgrades at certain areas.
Attitude towards territorial integrity, sovereignty and political
independence of BH is the most important issue of security of Western
Balkans and South East Europe. However, in case of occupation or
division of Sarajevo-Zenica region, sustainability of BH as a state will
be questionable, in other words, it is sure it won t exist.
By better organisation and interconnection of democratic forces, on
primary programs of stability, it is possible to ensure lasting peace at area
of SZ region. Dispersion of animosity and distrust should be prevented by
actions of democratic forces because, otherwise, it can affect peace and
stability. Confidence and tolerance among people of different nations,
culture and religion should be encouraged as vital element of lasting peace.
Affirmation of security in states of South East Europe which means not
only balance of military effectives but balance of security policies,
positions of national minorities, regulations of relations of majority
population with their compatriots in neighbouring countries etc. will be
step ahead in democratic recovery of the Western Balkans states and South
East Europe. Stability pact of South East Europe should be a model for
democratic preparations of the states of this region in Euro Atlantic
integrations, which can provide the best environment of lasting peace.
272
|
| adam_txt |
SADRŽAJ
UVOD
.5
TEORIJSKO
OBJAŠNJENJE
OSNOVNIH POJMOVA
. 11
I.
DIO
GEOPOLITIČKI ZNAČAJ SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE
REGIJE
1.
GEOGRAFSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
.39
1.1.
Geografski položaj i granice
.39
1.2.
Reljef i površina
. .41
1.3.
Klima
.44
1.4.
Hidrografija
.44
1.5.
Pošumljenost
.46
2.
DEMOGRAFSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
.47
2.1.
Stanovništvo
.47
2.2.
Struktura stanovništva prema popisu iz
aprila
1991.
g
.52
2.3.
Migracije stanovništva
.55
3.
POLITIČKI ZNAČAJ SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE
REGIJE
.62
3.1.
Položaj regije u historiji
ВІН
.62
3.2.
Kontinuitet razvoja državne i političke vlasti
.96
3.2.1.
Bosanski državni stanak-Sabor
.114
3.2.2.
Raspisivanje i sprovođenje Referenduma
1992.
godine
.116
3.3.
Geneza političkog
organizo
vanj a na
području regije
.118
321
SADRŽAJ
II.
DIO
PRIVREDNE, SOCIJALNE, OBRAZOVNE I
KULTUROLOŠKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
1.
PRIVREDA
.139
1.1.
Industrija
. 148
1.2.
Energetika
. 152
1.3.
Rudarstvo
. 153
1.4.
Mala privreda i zanatstvo
. 154
2.
SAOBRAĆAJ
. 156
2.1.
Putni saobraćaj
. 156
2.2.
Željeznički saobraćaj
. 163
2.3.
Zračni saobraćaj
. 164
2.4.
Sistem veza i telekomunikacija
. 164
3.
POLJOPRIVREDA, STOČARSTVO,
VETERINARSTVO, ŠUMARSTVO I
VODOPRIVREDA
.166
3.1.
Poljoprivreda
. 166
3.2.
Stočarstvo
. 167
3.3.
Veterinarstvo
. 168
3.4.
Šumarstvo
. 169
3.5.
Vodoprivreda
. 169
4.
NASELJA, URBANIZAMJ STAMBENI I
KOMUNALNI POSLOVI I GRAĐEVINARSTVO
. .171
4.1.
Naselja
.171
4.2.
Urbanizam, stambeni i komunalni poslovi
.175
4.3.
Građevinarstvo
.178
5.
ZDRAVSTVO I SOCIJALNA ZAŠTITA
.180
5.1.
Zdravstvo
.180
5.2.
Socijalna zaštita
.184
6.
NAUKA, OBRAZOVANJE, KULTURA I SPORT
. . 187
6.1.
Nauka i obrazovanje
.187
6.2.
Kultura
.193
6.3.
Sport
.196
322
Džema! NAJETOVIĆ
7.
INFORMATIVNA DJELATNOST
. 198
7.1.
Radio-difuzna i televizijska mreža
. 198
7.2.
Novinsko-izdavačka djelatnost
. 199
7.3.
Filmska djelatnost
. 199
8.
UPRAVA, PRAVOSUĐE I IZVRŠENJE
KRIVIČNIH SANKCIJA
.201
III DIO
ZNAČAJ SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE IVO
ЛЅТА
CENTRALNA BOSNA ZA OČUVANJE
TERITORIJALNOG INTEGRITETA I SUVERENITETA
BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
1.
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKA REGIJA U RATOVIMA
ZA I OKO BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE
.205
1.1.
Vojne prilike u Sarajevsko-zeničkoj regiji od
antičkog doba do početka
XX
st
.205
1.2.
Vojne prilike u Sarajevsko-zeničkoj regiji u
prvoj polovini
XX
st
.213
1.3.
Sarajevsko-zenička regija u ratu
1992.
do
1995.
godine
.218
2.
GEOSTRATEGIJSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
BOSANSKOHERCEGOVAČKOG RATIŠTA
. 235
2.1.
Veličina, oblik i granice bosanskohercegovačkog
ratišta
.235
2.2.
Geografske i hidrografske karakteristike
bosanskohercegovačkog ratišta
.236
2.3.
Geostrategijski položaj bosanskohercegovačkog
ratišta u odnosu na zapadni Balkan, jugoistočnu
Evropu, Južnoevropsko i Centralnoevropsko
vojište
.238
2.4.
Smisao i značaj vojno-teritorijalne podjele
ВІН
.241
2.5.
Moguća vojišta (geostrategijske cjeline)
bosanskohercegovačkog ratišta
.242
3.
GEOSTRATEGIJSKE KARAKTERISTIKE
SARAJEVSKO-ZENIČKE REGIJE
.247
3.1.
Geostrategijski položaj Šarajevsko-zeničke regije
. 247
323
SADRŽAJ
3.2.
Geostrategijske karakteristike mogućih pravaca
dejstva
agresora na područje Sarajevsko-zeničke
regije
.248
3.3.
Geostrategijski značaj Sarajevsko-zeničke
regije u vojištu Centralna Bosna
.250
ZAKLJUČNA RAZMATRANJA
.257
SUMMARY
.265
BIBLIOGRAFIJA
.273
PRILOZI
.295
INDEKS LIČNIH IMENA
.304
RECENZIJE
.312
SADRŽAJ
.321
324
f
_. Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek
München
SUMMARY
This study covers basic characteristics related to geopolitical
importance of Sarajevo-Zenica region (SZ) as area with determined
strategic, political and military influence in sustainability and sovereignty
of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
From the perspective of natural and human resources and their
interconnection with social processes, SZ region is considered as central
territory of BH. Such geographic position represents nucleus of BH
geo-strategic area. The most populated areas in this region are valleys and
river valleys. Tendency of continuous population density in narrow river
valleys, specially by river Bosnia which is most populated area of
ВІН
might result to complete jam by infrastructure, industrial and working
zones. Therefore, this trend should be stopped and population density
should be directed to hills.
Romans had started building urban settlements in this area. Population
settlements, among communications were in function of travel stations.
Coalmines and sources of thermal and mineral water had also been often
surrounding of these settlements. Beside that, first administrative centres
were established. First residents of these centres were soldiers, officers and
traders accompanied thereafter by local population (upon approval of their
Roman citizenship). Each Roman town had central square, town hall, court
building, streets, public rest room, central heating, water pipelines and
sewerage system. From its establishment up to date, SZ region went
through various state and political government organisation. This region
was hardly ever politically isolated and it was often governed by
foreigners; starting by Poblije Kornelije Dolabelo (X century A.C) up to
present High Representative Paddy Ashdown.
SZ region has solid resources of coal,
förrest,
water power potentials
etc, which is of vital importance for realisation of BH development
concept.
Majority of basic and energy capacities are already developed by main
regional motorway corridor
5
С
and those are: capacities for metal works in
265
SUMMARY
Zenica
and
Hijas,
coal production in
Zenica,
Kakanj and
Breza
as well as
steam power plant in
Čatići.
SZ
region almost matches the area of medieval Bosnian state which is
characterised by: high level of independence, developed trading and
economic relations with neighbourhood, establishment of settlements and
first towns in accordance with European standards. This long-lasting
period of internal peace and consolidation resulted to introduction of own
currency, organisation of internal relations and establishment of strong
state institutions such as Parliament etc.
Among bogumils,
ortodox
and chatolic communities, community of
Islamic population was also established. They all have Slavic origin,
similar language and many similarities in culture, lifestyle, mentality etc.
During Ottoman Empire, SZ region was part of Sarajevo Sanjak
(administrative division), which after became Bosnian
pašaluk
(mode of
governing).
Social organisation was based on strong central government with
military character. Basic military-administrative unit was
vilajet
that was
composed by number of districts and municipalities. All the time, during
Ottoman governing, SZ region was on borderline. At the beginning, it was
initial base for further conquering and later it served as rampart during
defence from Austro-Hungary and
Mletačka Republika.
Since Austro-Hungarian occupation
1878-1908,
this area was under
formal sovereignty of Sultan while actual governing approved by Europe
and Turkey belonged to Austro-Hungary. By annexation
1908
Austro-Hungary illegitimately violated Berlin agreement and took over
sovereignty over BH by paying to
Türkey 2,5
millions of
GB
Pounds.
Despite of its own Constitution and Parliament, BH was not entitled to
establish its laws independently. During Austro-Hungarian governing,
they legal system was also applied on BH.
Based on Article
135
of
Vidovdan
Constitution
1921
BH managed to
maintain territorial integrity within its historical borders. All the time until
establishment of central governing
1929,
BH had elements of autonomous
government with headquarter in Sarajevo and
6
regional administrative
branches. During same year, for very first time since
1463,
king Alexander
broke territorial integrity of BH when he divided BH on
4
parts
-banovine
(ban-leader). Purpose of this division was to make sure that Bosniacs are
not majority in any of
banovina.
In July
1941,
in SZ region was established
Ustaša
governing
-
so called
Independent State of Croatia (NDH). Beside municipalities and counties as
266
Dźemal
NAJETOVIĆ
higher administrative-governing units, there were also districts. As a result
of participation of all ethnics groups in world war II
1941-1945,
after
480
years, on
25
November
1943
in
Vrcar Vakuf (Mrkonjić Grad)
at first
session of ZAVNOBiH, BH renewed its sovereignty and on second session
of
AVNOJ (Anti
fascists Council of national deliberation of Yugoslavia)
on
29
November
1943
in town
Jajce,
representatives of all three BH ethnic
groups endorsed decision of ZAVNOBIH which declares
ВІН
as one of six
federal equal units of future Democratic Federal Yugoslavia.
State and governing law composed socialist legal system. As per law on
peoples committees, BH was divided on districts: Sarajevo,Travnik,
Banjaluka, Doboj, Bihać
and
Tuzla.
At that time, SZ region was mostly
covered by Sarajevo and
Travnik
district. This division lasted until
1952
when territorial division of BH was introduced. This territorial division
divided BH on municipalities and districts. During seventies, division was
reduced only on municipalities with
7
newly established economical
regions (chamber of commerce), which was almost equal to division
1946
on districts that represented territorial-administrative units. Citizens of SZ
regions were accomplishing their interests through delegations and
delegates and that system was reflection of political system
ofthat
time.
In relation to political-administrative division of that time, Prof. Dr.
Omer
Ibrahimagić
had proposed formation of
4
regions and stated: "That is
why I believe that concept is consisted in Platform of Presidency to divide
BH on
4
regions: Sarajevo,
Banjaluka, Tuzla
and
Mostar
with possibility of
establishment of new regions based on their historical origin where modern
European criteria will be applied for political-administrative division of
our state".514
Regionalisation
of BH requires special focus on macro-economic policy
problems. That is new factor of
regionalisation.
At present time, regions are
not and cannot be solely territorial units responsible for directing economic
development. They should have administrative, political, economic and
defence functions and from the other hand, that raises the issue about
division of government and especially macro-economic policy. In regional
research, issue of macro-economic policy was hardly ever raised. This
514
Omer
Ibrahimagić:
"Bosnia and Bosniacs-state and people that had been supposed
to disappear", Published by:
Svjetlost,
Sarajevo
1996,
page
19
In this publication,
on page
18-22
there is writer's article titled "Autonomy of SZ region" which was
also later on published in the newspaper
"Muslimanski
list" on
21
September
1992
1
am referring to this publication because I want to express my gratitude to author for
using scientific argumentations and for actualising historical continuity of state
organisation of BH.
267
SUMMARY
study could not go further in this direction because transition of economic
system through privatisation process is still not completed and there is luck
of data about war damage, which affected economy, and therefore, any
deeper analyses at current time will be pure improvisation.
Basic characteristic of political parties organisation in SZ region is
reflecting confessional structure of their population. In other words,
distinct social division of population by religion had predominant role in
formation of political parties and organisations. Political activity of
population in SZ region emerged together with raise of national affiliation,
based on religion tradition.
As central Bosnian mining and highlands points, SZ region was through
the centuries subject of neighbour's aspirations and for that reason, there
were about
200
conquests on same. SZ region can contribute with its power
in enabling BH to become, for its neighbours, in terms of territory forever
lost area.
Conquered area Romans had pacified by strong measures, by displacing
population, by land confiscation and by recruitments. They also imposed
mandatory military service out of Bosnia that lasted
30
years. Romans built
numbers of military fortresses and road communications that served as
shortcut
-
gateway to
Panonija
and Danube Basin.
During medieval, there were numerous forms of warfare in SZ region. If
we take a closer insight in this wars, we can find out that population of
medieval Bosnian state defended their freedom and conclude that these
wars, as per standard classification of wars had defending character.
Warfare during medieval had strengthen power of military and feudal
decision makers and had huge influence in enforcement of state institutions
and
fédéralisation
process. All the time until political brake down, army
was a bunch of feudal military units supported by central government.
During Ottoman Empire, these region had specific military organisation
made of: landowners, provincial cavalry,
Krajina
servants, border guards,
local forces and local military forces. At the beginning of Ottoman
governing in Bosnia, there were also janissaries. Their main detachments
were in Sarajevo and Vranduk. During Ottoman Empire, in Bosnian
Pašaluk,
it was possible to mobilise about
60 000
soldiers for mobilisation.
All of them were getting salaries in money.
Austro-Hungarian troops occupied BH between
29
July
-20
October
1878
by braking down great resistance showed by Muslim population.
After occupation, Austro-Hungary kept
6
divisions with about
50 000
soldiers in BH. Apart from regular army, in September
1878,
another
2
268
Džemal NAJETO
VIĆ
Corps was established;
Serežanski
(Gendarmerie) with
3.091
members and
Pandurski
(Police) with
952
repatriated Herzegovina rebels.
In addition, there was also police establishment with
338
guards. During
Austro-Hungarian government, this area was divided on
4
military districts
with headquarters in Sarajevo,
Banja Luka, Tuzla
and
Mostar
with first
companies composed by BH personnel. First company was formed in
Sarajevo. Since
1883,
SZ region belonged to IS" district Corp.
During Kingdom of Serbs Croats and Slovenians (SHS), SZ region was
part of
Drina banovina
(regional division) in zone of responsibility of
second army.
There is very interesting "Protocol agreement" written in that time
between Yugoslavian Muslim club and government of Nikola
Pašić,
where
point
9
states following: "misconducts of individuals in army, schools, and
other official services directed towards offence of religion will be subject
of strict punishment and they would particularly be no force imposed on
Muslim soldiers during church-confessional ceremonies".
1941,
when the war broke out, Bosnians were exposed to great
temptation. While NDH tried to manipulate with them and use them for
their objectives, from the other side they were exposed to dreadful
genocide from chetnics. Bosnians adopted number of resolutions in the
autumn
1941
and dissociated themselves from Ustacha's policy and
genocide on Serbs, Jews and Romans and condemned those from their
population who participated in such crime. From the very beginning of
rebellion, some Bosniacs joined partisan units. Trend of massive entry of
Bosniacs into National deliberation Army
(NOV)
happened in the autumn
1943
and they gave tremendous contribution to anti-fascist battle that later
on developed modern democratic Europe.
After dissolution of former
SFR
Yugoslavia, SR Yugoslavia and
Republic of Croatia had expressed territorial claims towards
ВІН.
Aggression on
ВІН
was prepared and conducted together with wars in
SFRY area with objective of capturing, moving borders and formation of
Great Serbia and Great Croatia by sacrifice of BH.
During recent war, region of SZ was surrounded and partially captured
by forces of
Republika Srpska
and
HVO
(Croat Defence Council).
Sarajevo was under siege for
1.100
days. Despite that, SZ region still
represented operative-strategic intact in usage of forces and defence of
land as well as in modest logistic support of almost entire Army of RBH.
From the perspective of its role and position in warfare, operative-strategic
position, deployment of armed forces and economic potential, SZ region
269
SUMMARY
had most important role in defence of territorial and political integrity of
ВІН.
Political and military importance of SZ region lays on fact that this
territory was successfully defended in previous war as base of BH defence.
This region was operative-strategic area that accommodated most
important state institutions such as: Presidency, Government, GS of AF,
main Army logistic centre etc. As per its geo-strategic position and overall
economic and military potentials, SZ region was a central BH battlefield in
recent war.
Geo-strategic position of BH battlefield is based on BH position in
Balkans, Europe and World. Important characteristic of its geo-strategic
position is the fact that territory of
ВІН
with Republic of Croatia divides
armed forces of NATO Alliance from other states of South-eastern Europe
willing to join NATO Alliance. These elements are having direct influence
on position and relations of BH with its neighbours, NATO Alliance and its
partners. Establishment of security policy of BH should be based on these
facts and comply with security system of
EU
and internationally. This is
particularly specific because of geo-strategic position of BH Theater,
which is, comparing to Western Balkans, South-East Europe, South
European and Central European Theater more important. Europe covers
central position ashore hemisphere and has good connections with Asia,
Africa, America and therefore, great influence on course of happenings in
the world.
Geographic, historical, economic, cultural and other conditions in BH
had influenced separation of
4
battlefields
-
geo-strategic units differing
one from another. Those are: battlefield
Bosanska krajina
or Banjaluka-
-Bihać
region (it can also be called Southwest Bosnia), battlefield Central
Bosnia or Sarajevo-Zenica region, battlefield North-East Bosnia or
Tuzla-Doboj region and battlefield Herzegovina or Mostar-Trebinje
region. Their borders are mainly defined by physical-geographic elements
and they do not match with entity borders, canton etc. In this study, it is
explained why there are
4
and no more battlefields. It is also stated that
proposed division enables establishment of smaller regions within each
mentioned big region. This proposal of military-territorial division is not
final; there is still possibility of further research of regional organisation of
BH not only for defence purpose but more efficient social-economic
system. Regional development should be based on overall development. In
addition to that, as per additional requirements, each region should have
basic economic, development, demographic and other potentials necessary
for mutual cooperation and coordination of global development, security
and defence.
270
Džemal NAJETOVIĆ
Proposed military-territorial division of
BH
theatre provides reasonable
base for security requirements and defence from possible aggression and
from the other hand, this proposal is close to real area organisation of basic
activities of society (economy, education, health etc.) and therefore, it is
realistic, dynamic, adjustable and applicable in regional policy. This
proposal is a link between previous researches and given proposal of
division on geo-strategic units, which is great challenge for scientific work
to contribute in finding optimal solution for territorial division of BH.
If we study geo-strategic position and importance of theater of Central
Bosnia, in context of modern military-political situation in Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Balkans and Europe and if we keep in mind historical
interests for this region, we come to conclusion that geo-strategic position
of this region is very complex and more important than size of its territory.
That is geographic area that would have great strategic advantage and
important influence on physical unity of BH theater.
All efforts up to date related to division of BH state territory have
fulfilled its primary function by offering various models of its
administrative-territorial division. However, despite of principal support to
these proposals with no doubt on relevancy of criteria (economic-de¬
velopment, area-geographic, demographic-structural, infrastructure-
communication, urban-gravity, historic-traditional, ethnic-confessional);
there is still marginal objection due to luck of defence-security criteria.
Basic weakness of up to date divisions lays on fact that there is still no
proper regional division as unique issue of political, economic and military
importance. In this context, SZ region, as part of state territory that
represents circled entirety of possible defence in case of aggression is not
defined in terms of military-strategy. In present divisions, there are only
economic and social aspects while the military one is left aside. However,
the most acceptable solution would be to match military-territorial division
with political-administrative structure of the state. This study as well as
earlier researches is showing that division of regions cannot be done
unfounded act based on political will but rational action based on exact
research procedure. In further regional structuring, politics should make
balance between state and regions and enable optimal functioning of
overall social-political system. We need to achieve politics able to provide
security and stability of social-political, economic and military system BH
and enable dynamics of economy development. This research should not
be considered as final. It opens certain issues that can be subject of further
research. This study however covers solid research that should be
supplemented by results of further research. If there is still some ground for
271
SUMMARY
complaints, I am convinced that it will not affect the essence of this study;
it will just be attempt to for some upgrades at certain areas.
Attitude towards territorial integrity, sovereignty and political
independence of BH is the most important issue of security of Western
Balkans and South East Europe. However, in case of occupation or
division of Sarajevo-Zenica region, sustainability of BH as a state will
be questionable, in other words, it is sure it won't exist.
By better organisation and interconnection of democratic forces, on
primary programs of stability, it is possible to ensure lasting peace at area
of SZ region. Dispersion of animosity and distrust should be prevented by
actions of democratic forces because, otherwise, it can affect peace and
stability. Confidence and tolerance among people of different nations,
culture and religion should be encouraged as vital element of lasting peace.
Affirmation of security in states of South East Europe which means not
only balance of military effectives but balance of security policies,
positions of national minorities, regulations of relations of majority
population with their compatriots in neighbouring countries etc. will be
step ahead in democratic recovery of the Western Balkans states and South
East Europe. Stability pact of South East Europe should be a model for
democratic preparations of the states of this region in Euro Atlantic
integrations, which can provide the best environment of lasting peace.
272 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Najetović, Džemal |
| author_facet | Najetović, Džemal |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Najetović, Džemal |
| author_variant | dž n džn |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023031604 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)643081120 (DE-599)BVBBV023031604 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02181nam a2200505 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023031604</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080103 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">071203s2004 abd| |||| 00||| bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9958421216</subfield><subfield code="9">9958-42-121-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)643081120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023031604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Najetović, Džemal</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine</subfield><subfield code="c">Džemal Najetović</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Zenica</subfield><subfield code="b">Dom Štampe</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">324 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., Kt., graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geopolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156741-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sarajevo</subfield><subfield code="z">Region</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7521480-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bosnien-Herzegowina</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4088119-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zenica</subfield><subfield code="z">Region</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7598061-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bosnien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4007826-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bosnien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4007826-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Geopolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156741-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Bosnien-Herzegowina</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4088119-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zenica</subfield><subfield code="z">Region</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7598061-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Geopolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156741-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Bosnien-Herzegowina</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4088119-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sarajevo</subfield><subfield code="z">Region</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7521480-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Geopolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156741-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Bosnien-Herzegowina</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4088119-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016235473</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Sarajevo Region (DE-588)7521480-5 gnd Bosnien-Herzegowina (DE-588)4088119-2 gnd Zenica Region (DE-588)7598061-7 gnd Bosnien (DE-588)4007826-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Sarajevo Region Bosnien-Herzegowina Zenica Region Bosnien |
| id | DE-604.BV023031604 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T19:17:15Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:09:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9958421216 |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016235473 |
| oclc_num | 643081120 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 324 S. Ill., Kt., graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publishDateSearch | 2004 |
| publishDateSort | 2004 |
| publisher | Dom Štampe |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Najetović, Džemal Verfasser aut Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine Džemal Najetović Zenica Dom Štampe 2004 324 S. Ill., Kt., graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 gnd rswk-swf Sarajevo Region (DE-588)7521480-5 gnd rswk-swf Bosnien-Herzegowina (DE-588)4088119-2 gnd rswk-swf Zenica Region (DE-588)7598061-7 gnd rswk-swf Bosnien (DE-588)4007826-7 gnd rswk-swf Bosnien (DE-588)4007826-7 g Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 s Bosnien-Herzegowina (DE-588)4088119-2 g DE-604 Zenica Region (DE-588)7598061-7 g Sarajevo Region (DE-588)7521480-5 g Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Najetović, Džemal Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4156741-9 (DE-588)7521480-5 (DE-588)4088119-2 (DE-588)7598061-7 (DE-588)4007826-7 |
| title | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_auth | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_exact_search | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_full | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine Džemal Najetović |
| title_fullStr | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine Džemal Najetović |
| title_full_unstemmed | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine Džemal Najetović |
| title_short | Geopolitički značaj sarajevsko-zeničke regije u očuvanju državnosti Bosne i Hercegovine |
| title_sort | geopoliticki znacaj sarajevsko zenicke regije u ocuvanju drzavnosti bosne i hercegovine |
| topic | Geopolitik (DE-588)4156741-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Geopolitik Sarajevo Region Bosnien-Herzegowina Zenica Region Bosnien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016235473&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT najetovicdžemal geopolitickiznacajsarajevskozenickeregijeuocuvanjudrzavnostibosneihercegovine |