Repairing the damage: possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus
The damage that has been done to the transatlantic alliance will not be repaired through grand architectural redesigns or radical new agendas. Instead, the transatlantic partners need to restore their consensus and cooperation on key security challenges with a limited agenda that reflects the essent...
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Buch |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Abingdon
Routledge
2007
|
Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
Schriftenreihe: | Adelphi papers
389 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | The damage that has been done to the transatlantic alliance will not be repaired through grand architectural redesigns or radical new agendas. Instead, the transatlantic partners need to restore their consensus and cooperation on key security challenges with a limited agenda that reflects the essential conservatism of the transatlantic partnership during the Cold War and the 1990s. There will inevitably be big challenges, such as the rise of China, where transatlantic disparities in strategic means and commitments preclude any common alliance undertaking. Yet such limits are nothing new. The absence of a common transatlantic commitment to counter-insurgency in Iraq may cause resentments, but so too did the lack of a common commitment to counter-insurgency in Vietnam. This paper suggests ten propositions for future transatlantic consensus -- that is to say, ten security challenges for which the allies should be able to agree on common approaches. These run the gamut from an effective strategy to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear-weapons capability to transatlantic leadership for international cooperation against global warming. If pursued with seriousness and a reasonable degree of transatlantic unity, these propositions could constitute the foundations of an effective partnership. They are, in the authors' view, the basis for a consensus on the most pressing security challenges of the twenty-first century. The time is right for this kind of serious re-dedication to alliance purposes. There has already been some effort to repair the damage; moreover, new leaders are in place in or coming to the countries that were major protagonists of the transatlantic crisis: Germany, France, Britain and, in 2009, the United States. It is possible that these four new leaders will be better able to put the disputes of the recent past behind them. This extended essay is a guide to the possibilities, and also the limits, of a new start. |
Beschreibung: | 103 S. |
ISBN: | 9780415418690 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023029134 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20081205 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 071130s2007 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780415418690 |9 978-0-415-41869-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)166360319 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023029134 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-355 |a DE-188 |a DE-19 | ||
050 | 0 | |a D1065.U5 | |
082 | 0 | |a 327.7304 |2 22 | |
084 | |a MK 5250 |0 (DE-625)123079: |2 rvk | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Repairing the damage |b possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus |c Dana H. Allin ... |
250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
264 | 1 | |a Abingdon |b Routledge |c 2007 | |
300 | |a 103 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Adelphi papers |v 389 | |
520 | 3 | |a The damage that has been done to the transatlantic alliance will not be repaired through grand architectural redesigns or radical new agendas. Instead, the transatlantic partners need to restore their consensus and cooperation on key security challenges with a limited agenda that reflects the essential conservatism of the transatlantic partnership during the Cold War and the 1990s. There will inevitably be big challenges, such as the rise of China, where transatlantic disparities in strategic means and commitments preclude any common alliance undertaking. Yet such limits are nothing new. The absence of a common transatlantic commitment to counter-insurgency in Iraq may cause resentments, but so too did the lack of a common commitment to counter-insurgency in Vietnam. This paper suggests ten propositions for future transatlantic consensus -- that is to say, ten security challenges for which the allies should be able to agree on common approaches. These run the gamut from an effective strategy to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear-weapons capability to transatlantic leadership for international cooperation against global warming. If pursued with seriousness and a reasonable degree of transatlantic unity, these propositions could constitute the foundations of an effective partnership. They are, in the authors' view, the basis for a consensus on the most pressing security challenges of the twenty-first century. The time is right for this kind of serious re-dedication to alliance purposes. There has already been some effort to repair the damage; moreover, new leaders are in place in or coming to the countries that were major protagonists of the transatlantic crisis: Germany, France, Britain and, in 2009, the United States. It is possible that these four new leaders will be better able to put the disputes of the recent past behind them. This extended essay is a guide to the possibilities, and also the limits, of a new start. | |
650 | 7 | |a Buitenlandse betrekkingen |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Internationale politiek |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Non-prolifération nucléaire | |
650 | 4 | |a Opération Liberté immuable, 2001- | |
650 | 4 | |a Sécurité internationale | |
650 | 4 | |a Außenbeziehungen | |
650 | 4 | |a Außenpolitik | |
650 | 4 | |a Nuclear nonproliferation | |
650 | 4 | |a Security, International | |
650 | 4 | |a War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Politik |0 (DE-588)4072885-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kernwaffe |0 (DE-588)4003434-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Nonproliferation |0 (DE-588)4331181-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Terrorismus |0 (DE-588)4059534-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a Europa (geografie) |2 gtt | |
651 | 4 | |a Europe - Relations extérieures - États-Unis | |
651 | 7 | |a Verenigde Staten |2 gtt | |
651 | 4 | |a États-Unis - Relations extérieures - Europe | |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 4 | |a Europe |x Foreign relations |z United States | |
651 | 4 | |a United States |x Foreign relations |z Europe | |
651 | 7 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |D g |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Internationale Politik |0 (DE-588)4072885-7 |D s |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Kernwaffe |0 (DE-588)4003434-3 |D s |
689 | 1 | 2 | |a Nonproliferation |0 (DE-588)4331181-7 |D s |
689 | 1 | 3 | |a Terrorismus |0 (DE-588)4059534-1 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-188 | |
689 | 2 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 2 | 1 | |a Außenpolitik |0 (DE-588)4003846-4 |D s |
689 | 2 | 2 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |D g |
689 | 2 | |5 DE-188 | |
700 | 1 | |a Allin, Dana H. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
830 | 0 | |a Adelphi papers |v 389 |w (DE-604)BV002542379 |9 389 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016233048&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1805072918331260928 |
---|---|
adam_text |
Contents
Glossary
Acknowledgements
Introduction Ten Propositions for Transatlantic Consensus
Chapter One Beyond the War on Terror
The common struggle
21
'Root causes'
23
The limits of democracy
29
Terror, rights and the rule of law
30
The social geography of terrorism
31
Chapter Two Confronting Proliferation
Pre-emption and preventive war
39
Iran
41
Strengthening the non-proliferation regime
50
The NITs fragility
55
5
6
7
17
35
Chapter Three
State Failure, State-building and Democratic Change
The six most dangerous places in the world
61
Triage
77
The art of the possible
83
59
Conclusion
Ambitions and Limits of a Transatlantic Partnership
87
Appendix
IISS Transatlantic Steering Group and
Workshop Participants
93
Notes
97 |
adam_txt |
Contents
Glossary
Acknowledgements
Introduction Ten Propositions for Transatlantic Consensus
Chapter One Beyond the War on Terror
The common struggle
21
'Root causes'
23
The limits of democracy
29
Terror, rights and the rule of law
30
The social geography of terrorism
31
Chapter Two Confronting Proliferation
Pre-emption and preventive war
39
Iran
41
Strengthening the non-proliferation regime
50
The NITs fragility
55
5
6
7
17
35
Chapter Three
State Failure, State-building and Democratic Change
The six most dangerous places in the world
61
Triage
77
The art of the possible
83
59
Conclusion
Ambitions and Limits of a Transatlantic Partnership
87
Appendix
IISS Transatlantic Steering Group and
Workshop Participants
93
Notes
97 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023029134 |
callnumber-first | D - World History |
callnumber-label | D1065 |
callnumber-raw | D1065.U5 |
callnumber-search | D1065.U5 |
callnumber-sort | D 41065 U5 |
callnumber-subject | D - General History |
classification_rvk | MK 5250 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)166360319 (DE-599)BVBBV023029134 |
dewey-full | 327.7304 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 327 - International relations |
dewey-raw | 327.7304 |
dewey-search | 327.7304 |
dewey-sort | 3327.7304 |
dewey-tens | 320 - Political science (Politics and government) |
discipline | Politologie |
discipline_str_mv | Politologie |
edition | 1. publ. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023029134</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20081205</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">071130s2007 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780415418690</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-415-41869-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)166360319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023029134</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">D1065.U5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">327.7304</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MK 5250</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)123079:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Repairing the damage</subfield><subfield code="b">possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus</subfield><subfield code="c">Dana H. Allin ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Abingdon</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">103 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adelphi papers</subfield><subfield code="v">389</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The damage that has been done to the transatlantic alliance will not be repaired through grand architectural redesigns or radical new agendas. Instead, the transatlantic partners need to restore their consensus and cooperation on key security challenges with a limited agenda that reflects the essential conservatism of the transatlantic partnership during the Cold War and the 1990s. There will inevitably be big challenges, such as the rise of China, where transatlantic disparities in strategic means and commitments preclude any common alliance undertaking. Yet such limits are nothing new. The absence of a common transatlantic commitment to counter-insurgency in Iraq may cause resentments, but so too did the lack of a common commitment to counter-insurgency in Vietnam. This paper suggests ten propositions for future transatlantic consensus -- that is to say, ten security challenges for which the allies should be able to agree on common approaches. These run the gamut from an effective strategy to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear-weapons capability to transatlantic leadership for international cooperation against global warming. If pursued with seriousness and a reasonable degree of transatlantic unity, these propositions could constitute the foundations of an effective partnership. They are, in the authors' view, the basis for a consensus on the most pressing security challenges of the twenty-first century. The time is right for this kind of serious re-dedication to alliance purposes. There has already been some effort to repair the damage; moreover, new leaders are in place in or coming to the countries that were major protagonists of the transatlantic crisis: Germany, France, Britain and, in 2009, the United States. It is possible that these four new leaders will be better able to put the disputes of the recent past behind them. This extended essay is a guide to the possibilities, and also the limits, of a new start.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Buitenlandse betrekkingen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale politiek</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Non-prolifération nucléaire</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Opération Liberté immuable, 2001-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sécurité internationale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Außenbeziehungen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear nonproliferation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">War on Terrorism, 2001-2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4072885-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kernwaffe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003434-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nonproliferation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4331181-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Terrorismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4059534-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europa (geografie)</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europe - Relations extérieures - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verenigde Staten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">États-Unis - Relations extérieures - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">Foreign relations</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Foreign relations</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015701-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015701-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4072885-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kernwaffe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003434-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Nonproliferation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4331181-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Terrorismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4059534-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003846-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015701-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allin, Dana H.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Adelphi papers</subfield><subfield code="v">389</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002542379</subfield><subfield code="9">389</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016233048&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Europa (geografie) gtt Europe - Relations extérieures - États-Unis Verenigde Staten gtt États-Unis - Relations extérieures - Europe Europa USA Europe Foreign relations United States United States Foreign relations Europe Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 gnd USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | Europa (geografie) Europe - Relations extérieures - États-Unis Verenigde Staten États-Unis - Relations extérieures - Europe Europa USA Europe Foreign relations United States United States Foreign relations Europe |
id | DE-604.BV023029134 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T19:16:16Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-20T05:01:20Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780415418690 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016233048 |
oclc_num | 166360319 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 103 S. |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | marc |
series | Adelphi papers |
series2 | Adelphi papers |
spelling | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus Dana H. Allin ... 1. publ. Abingdon Routledge 2007 103 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Adelphi papers 389 The damage that has been done to the transatlantic alliance will not be repaired through grand architectural redesigns or radical new agendas. Instead, the transatlantic partners need to restore their consensus and cooperation on key security challenges with a limited agenda that reflects the essential conservatism of the transatlantic partnership during the Cold War and the 1990s. There will inevitably be big challenges, such as the rise of China, where transatlantic disparities in strategic means and commitments preclude any common alliance undertaking. Yet such limits are nothing new. The absence of a common transatlantic commitment to counter-insurgency in Iraq may cause resentments, but so too did the lack of a common commitment to counter-insurgency in Vietnam. This paper suggests ten propositions for future transatlantic consensus -- that is to say, ten security challenges for which the allies should be able to agree on common approaches. These run the gamut from an effective strategy to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear-weapons capability to transatlantic leadership for international cooperation against global warming. If pursued with seriousness and a reasonable degree of transatlantic unity, these propositions could constitute the foundations of an effective partnership. They are, in the authors' view, the basis for a consensus on the most pressing security challenges of the twenty-first century. The time is right for this kind of serious re-dedication to alliance purposes. There has already been some effort to repair the damage; moreover, new leaders are in place in or coming to the countries that were major protagonists of the transatlantic crisis: Germany, France, Britain and, in 2009, the United States. It is possible that these four new leaders will be better able to put the disputes of the recent past behind them. This extended essay is a guide to the possibilities, and also the limits, of a new start. Buitenlandse betrekkingen gtt Internationale politiek gtt Non-prolifération nucléaire Opération Liberté immuable, 2001- Sécurité internationale Außenbeziehungen Außenpolitik Nuclear nonproliferation Security, International War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd rswk-swf Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd rswk-swf Kernwaffe (DE-588)4003434-3 gnd rswk-swf Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd rswk-swf Nonproliferation (DE-588)4331181-7 gnd rswk-swf Terrorismus (DE-588)4059534-1 gnd rswk-swf Europa (geografie) gtt Europe - Relations extérieures - États-Unis Verenigde Staten gtt États-Unis - Relations extérieures - Europe Europa USA Europe Foreign relations United States United States Foreign relations Europe Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 s Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 s Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 g DE-604 Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 s Kernwaffe (DE-588)4003434-3 s Nonproliferation (DE-588)4331181-7 s Terrorismus (DE-588)4059534-1 s DE-188 Allin, Dana H. Sonstige oth Adelphi papers 389 (DE-604)BV002542379 389 Digitalisierung UB Regensburg application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016233048&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus Adelphi papers Buitenlandse betrekkingen gtt Internationale politiek gtt Non-prolifération nucléaire Opération Liberté immuable, 2001- Sécurité internationale Außenbeziehungen Außenpolitik Nuclear nonproliferation Security, International War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd Kernwaffe (DE-588)4003434-3 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd Nonproliferation (DE-588)4331181-7 gnd Terrorismus (DE-588)4059534-1 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4072885-7 (DE-588)4003846-4 (DE-588)4003434-3 (DE-588)4116489-1 (DE-588)4331181-7 (DE-588)4059534-1 (DE-588)4015701-5 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus |
title_auth | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus |
title_exact_search | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus |
title_exact_search_txtP | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus |
title_full | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus Dana H. Allin ... |
title_fullStr | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus Dana H. Allin ... |
title_full_unstemmed | Repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus Dana H. Allin ... |
title_short | Repairing the damage |
title_sort | repairing the damage possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus |
title_sub | possibilities and limits of transatlantic consensus |
topic | Buitenlandse betrekkingen gtt Internationale politiek gtt Non-prolifération nucléaire Opération Liberté immuable, 2001- Sécurité internationale Außenbeziehungen Außenpolitik Nuclear nonproliferation Security, International War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 Internationale Politik (DE-588)4072885-7 gnd Außenpolitik (DE-588)4003846-4 gnd Kernwaffe (DE-588)4003434-3 gnd Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd Nonproliferation (DE-588)4331181-7 gnd Terrorismus (DE-588)4059534-1 gnd |
topic_facet | Buitenlandse betrekkingen Internationale politiek Non-prolifération nucléaire Opération Liberté immuable, 2001- Sécurité internationale Außenbeziehungen Außenpolitik Nuclear nonproliferation Security, International War on Terrorism, 2001-2009 Internationale Politik Kernwaffe Sicherheitspolitik Nonproliferation Terrorismus Europa (geografie) Europe - Relations extérieures - États-Unis Verenigde Staten États-Unis - Relations extérieures - Europe Europa USA Europe Foreign relations United States United States Foreign relations Europe |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016233048&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002542379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allindanah repairingthedamagepossibilitiesandlimitsoftransatlanticconsensus |