A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme: the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
London
printed for Henry Shepard at the Bible in Tower-street, and for WIlliam Ley at his shop in Pauls Church-yard neere Doctors Commons
1646
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 LCO01 SBR01 UBA01 UBG01 UBM01 UBR01 UBT01 UEI01 UER01 Volltext |
Beschreibung: | Annotation on Thomason copy: "Jan: 19th 1645"; the second 6 in imprint date crossed out. - Reproduction of the original in the British Library. - T.B. = Thomas Bakewell. - Thomason, E.316[23]. - Wing (2nd ed.), B534 |
Beschreibung: | Online-Ressource |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV022703724 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 070831s1646 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)644515248 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022703724 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-384 |a DE-473 |a DE-703 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-155 |a DE-70 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bakewell, Thomas |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme |b the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it |c By T.B |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a Justification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme |
264 | 1 | |a London |b printed for Henry Shepard at the Bible in Tower-street, and for WIlliam Ley at his shop in Pauls Church-yard neere Doctors Commons |c 1646 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Annotation on Thomason copy: "Jan: 19th 1645"; the second 6 in imprint date crossed out. - Reproduction of the original in the British Library. - T.B. = Thomas Bakewell. - Thomason, E.316[23]. - Wing (2nd ed.), B534 | ||
533 | |a Online-Ausgabe |b Ann Arbor, Mich |c UMI |d 1999- |f Early English books online |n Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 20723581 |n Digital version of: (Thomason Tracts ; 52:E316[23]) |7 s1999 | ||
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Hobson, Paul / Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Hobson, Paul |t Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Tombes, John |d 1603?-1676 |
650 | 4 | |a Anabaptists - Controversial literature | |
650 | 4 | |a Early works to 1800 | |
650 | 4 | |a Infant baptism - Early works to 1800 | |
650 | 4 | |a Anabaptists |v Controversial literature |v Early works to 1800 | |
650 | 4 | |a Infant baptism |v Early works to 1800 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Reproduktion von |a Bakewell, Thomas |t A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme |d 1646 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-EEB | ||
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015909583 | ||
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l LCO01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l SBR01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l UBA01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l UBM01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l UBR01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l UBT01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l UEI01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |l UER01 |p ZDB-1-EEB |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804136919899045888 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Bakewell, Thomas |
author_facet | Bakewell, Thomas |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Bakewell, Thomas |
author_variant | t b tb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV022703724 |
collection | ZDB-1-EEB |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)644515248 (DE-599)BVBBV022703724 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03829nmm a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022703724</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070831s1646 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)644515248</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022703724</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-155</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bakewell, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme</subfield><subfield code="b">the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it</subfield><subfield code="c">By T.B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Justification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">printed for Henry Shepard at the Bible in Tower-street, and for WIlliam Ley at his shop in Pauls Church-yard neere Doctors Commons</subfield><subfield code="c">1646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Annotation on Thomason copy: "Jan: 19th 1645"; the second 6 in imprint date crossed out. - Reproduction of the original in the British Library. - T.B. = Thomas Bakewell. - Thomason, E.316[23]. - Wing (2nd ed.), B534</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="533" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="b">Ann Arbor, Mich</subfield><subfield code="c">UMI</subfield><subfield code="d">1999-</subfield><subfield code="f">Early English books online</subfield><subfield code="n">Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 20723581</subfield><subfield code="n">Digital version of: (Thomason Tracts ; 52:E316[23])</subfield><subfield code="7">s1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hobson, Paul / Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hobson, Paul</subfield><subfield code="t">Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Tombes, John</subfield><subfield code="d">1603?-1676</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anabaptists - Controversial literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infant baptism - Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Anabaptists</subfield><subfield code="v">Controversial literature</subfield><subfield code="v">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Infant baptism</subfield><subfield code="v">Early works to 1800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Reproduktion von</subfield><subfield code="a">Bakewell, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="t">A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme</subfield><subfield code="d">1646</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015909583</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">LCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">SBR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">UBA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">UBM01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">UBR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">UBT01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">UEI01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612</subfield><subfield code="l">UER01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-1-EEB</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV022703724 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T18:26:18Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:04:03Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015909583 |
oclc_num | 644515248 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-824 DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-155 DE-BY-UBR DE-70 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-703 DE-824 DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-155 DE-BY-UBR DE-70 |
physical | Online-Ressource |
psigel | ZDB-1-EEB |
publishDate | 1646 |
publishDateSearch | 1646 |
publishDateSort | 1646 |
publisher | printed for Henry Shepard at the Bible in Tower-street, and for WIlliam Ley at his shop in Pauls Church-yard neere Doctors Commons |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Bakewell, Thomas Verfasser aut A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it By T.B Justification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme London printed for Henry Shepard at the Bible in Tower-street, and for WIlliam Ley at his shop in Pauls Church-yard neere Doctors Commons 1646 Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Annotation on Thomason copy: "Jan: 19th 1645"; the second 6 in imprint date crossed out. - Reproduction of the original in the British Library. - T.B. = Thomas Bakewell. - Thomason, E.316[23]. - Wing (2nd ed.), B534 Online-Ausgabe Ann Arbor, Mich UMI 1999- Early English books online Sonstige Standardnummer des Gesamttitels: 20723581 Digital version of: (Thomason Tracts ; 52:E316[23]) s1999 Hobson, Paul / Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Hobson, Paul Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Tombes, John 1603?-1676 Anabaptists - Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism - Early works to 1800 Anabaptists Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism Early works to 1800 Reproduktion von Bakewell, Thomas A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme 1646 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 Volltext |
spellingShingle | Bakewell, Thomas A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it Hobson, Paul / Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Hobson, Paul Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Tombes, John 1603?-1676 Anabaptists - Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism - Early works to 1800 Anabaptists Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism Early works to 1800 |
title | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it |
title_alt | Justification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme |
title_auth | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it |
title_exact_search | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it |
title_exact_search_txtP | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it |
title_full | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it By T.B |
title_fullStr | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it By T.B |
title_full_unstemmed | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it By T.B |
title_short | A iustification of two points now in controversie with the Anabaptists concerning baptisme |
title_sort | a iustification of two points now in controversie with the anabaptists concerning baptisme the first is that infants of christians ought to be baptized with grounds to prove it and their objections answered with a briefe answer to master tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme also a briefe answer to captaine hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme being as he saith that which should have beene disputed by him and mr knowles and some others against mr calamy and mr cranford the second point is that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water with grounds to prove it and a briefe auswer sic to what they have to say against it |
title_sub | the first is, that infants of Christians ought to be baptized, with grounds to prove it, and their objections answered. With a briefe answer to Master Tombes twelve doubtfull arguments against it in his exercitation about infants baptisme. Also a briefe answer to Captaine Hobsons five arguments in his falacy of infants baptisme, being (as he saith) that which should have beene disputed by him, and Mr. Knowles, and some others; against Mr. Calamy and Mr. Cranford. The second point is, that the sprinckling the baptized more agreeth with the minde of Christ then dipping or plunging in or under the water: with grounds to prove it, and a briefe auswer [sic] to what they have to say against it |
topic | Hobson, Paul / Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Hobson, Paul Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Tombes, John 1603?-1676 Anabaptists - Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism - Early works to 1800 Anabaptists Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism Early works to 1800 |
topic_facet | Hobson, Paul / Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Hobson, Paul Fallacy of infants baptisme discovered Tombes, John 1603?-1676 Anabaptists - Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism - Early works to 1800 Anabaptists Controversial literature Early works to 1800 Infant baptism Early works to 1800 |
url | https://search.proquest.com/docview/2248516612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakewellthomas aiustificationoftwopointsnowincontroversiewiththeanabaptistsconcerningbaptismethefirstisthatinfantsofchristiansoughttobebaptizedwithgroundstoproveitandtheirobjectionsansweredwithabriefeanswertomastertombestwelvedoubtfullargumentsagainstitinhisexercitation AT bakewellthomas justificationoftwopointsnowincontroversiewiththeanabaptistsconcerningbaptisme |