The right judge for each case: a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Antwerpen [u.a.]
Intersentia [u.a.]
2007
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Ius commune europaeum
57 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XI, 270 S. graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9050956505 9789050956505 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022620386 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20160122 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 070823s2007 d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9050956505 |9 90-5095-650-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789050956505 |9 978-90-5095-650-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)255601346 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ261241451 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-12 |a DE-188 |a DE-739 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJC3666 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.4014 | |
| 084 | |a PS 3840 |0 (DE-625)139792: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 2 |2 ssgn | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The right judge for each case |b a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries |c Philip M. Langbroek ... [eds. and research directors] |
| 264 | 1 | |a Antwerpen [u.a.] |b Intersentia [u.a.] |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a XI, 270 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Ius commune europaeum |v 57 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Court administration - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Court calendars - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Courts - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judges - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice, Administration of - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rechtsvergleich | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Richter | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Unabhängigkeit | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Langbroek, Philip M. |d 1955- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1032999799 |4 oth | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Ius commune europaeum |v 57 |w (DE-604)BV010118502 |9 57 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015826459&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015826459 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804136780076679168 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | THE RIGHT JUDGE FOR EACH CASE A STUDY OF CASE ASSIGNMENT AND
IMPARTIALITY IN SIX EUROPEAN JUDICIARIES PHILIP M. LANGBROEK AND MARCO
FABRI INTERSENTIA METRO TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE PART 1: COMPARING 1
CHAPTER I THE RESEARCH PROJECT, DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 3 PHILIP M.
LANGBROEK AND MARCO FABRI 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. AIM AND OUTPUT OF THIS
RESEARCH PROJECT 5 3. PROJECT OUTLINE AND RESEARCH METHOD 5 4. THE
RESEARCH FORMAT 7 5. TERMINOLOGY 10 CHAPTER II INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT
AND JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 13 PHILIP M. LANGBROEK
AND MARCO FABRI 1. INTRODUCTION 13 2. VALUES 13 2.1. CONSTITUTIONAL
PERSPECTIVE: JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY,
ACCOUNTABILITY 13 2.2. ORGANISATIONAL PERCPECTIVE: EFFICIENCY,
FLEXIBILITY 16 2.3. PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVE: JUDICIAL INDEFINITENESS,
JUDICIAL AUTONOMY, EQUAL RECOGNITION, JUDICIAL AND JURIDICAL QUALITY 17
3. THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN VALUES AND INSTRUMENTS IN COURTS 19 3.1.
INDEPENDENCE AND AUTONOMY 19 3.2. SKILLS AND FLEXIBILITY 21 3.3.
FRATERNITY, AUTONOMY AND IMPARTIALITY 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4. CONCLUSION
23 4.1. THREE MAJOR TENSIONS FOR CASE ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS 23 4.2. A FINAL
WORD ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN FEATURES OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND CASE
ASSIGNMENT 25 CHAPTER III A COMPARISON OF CASE ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS IN SIX
EUROPEAN JUDICIARIES: DESCRIPTION AND COMPARATIVE GRID 27 MARCO FABRI
AND PHILIP M. LANGBROEK 1. INTRODUCTION 27 2. INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS OF
THE COURTS 28 3. PRINCIPLES AND GENERAL RULES 30 3.1. IUS DE NON
EVOCANDO 30 3.2. IMMOVABILITY OF JUDGES 31 3.3. CHALLENGING JUDGES AND
JUDICIAL RESIGNATION FROM A CASE 32 3.4. PRIMARY JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY
33 3.5. EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITIES 33 4. INTERNAL COURT ORGANISATION 34
4.1. SPECIALISED COURTS AND SPECIALISED COURT DIVISIONS AND UNITS 34
4.2. ALLOCATIONOF JUDGES WITHINA COURT AND BETWEEN COURTS 35 4.3. TASK
FORCES AND JUDGES TRANSFERS 36 5. INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT 36 5.1. WHO
HAS ASSIGNMENT COMPETENCE? 36 5.2. ROLE OF THE HEADS OF ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS 37 5.3. HOW ARE CASES ASSIGNED TO THE JUDGES? 38 5.4. CASE
ASSIGNMENT AND JUDGE SHOPPING 39 5.5. INFORMAL EXCHANGE OF CASES BETWEEN
JUDGES 40 5.6. BALANCED CASELOADS 40 COMPARATIVE GRID: INTERNAL CASE
ASSIGNMENT IN SOME EUROPEAN JUDICIARIES 41 PART 2: CASE STUDIES 83
CHAPTER IV CASE ASSIGNMENT IN DANISH COURTS 85 EVA SMITH 1. INTRODUCTION
85 2. INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS 86 3. RULES TO ENHANCE AND PROTECT JUDICIAL
INTEGRITY AND IMPARTIALITY IN RELATION TO CASE ASSIGNMENT 89 4.
PRACTICES AND CONTEXTS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT IN DANISH COURTS 92 4.1.
DESCRIPTIONS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT PER COURT 93 4.2. SPECIFIC ISSUES 98 5.
STAKEHOLDERS OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 100 5.1. PUBLIC OPINION 100
TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.2. EVALUATION OF THE ACTUAL INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT
BY JUDGES, AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF SAF EGUARDS OF JUDICIAL INTEGRITY
101 6. CONCLUSION 102 CHAPTER V CASE ASSIGNMENT IN DUTCH COURTS 105
PHILIP M. LANGBROEK 1. INSTITUTIONAL SETTING 105 1.1. ORGANISATIONAL
ARRANGEMENTS 105 2. RULES AND PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE ASSIGNMENT IN
COURTS 108 2.1. INCORPORATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE DUTCH LEGAL
SYSTEM 108 2.2. LUS DE NON EVOCANDO 109 2.3. LEGAL PROVISIONS ENHANCING
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY 109 3. PRACTICES AND
CONTEXTS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT 112 3.1. ENHANCING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY 112
3.2. PRACTICES OF INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT IN THE NETHERLANDS 113 4.
STAKEHOLDERS OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 124 4.1. CRITICISM 124 4.2.
EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL INTEGRITY BY JUDGES, COURT MANAGEMENT AND
STAKEHOLDERS 127 5. CONCLUSION 127 5.1. DUTCH COURTS UNDER PRESSURE 128
5.2. REDUCTION OF PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY 129 5.3. BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL
AUTONOMY AND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY 130 CHAPTER VI CASE ASSIGNMENT IN
ENGLISH COURTS 133 JOHN FLOOD, AVIS WHYTE, REZA BANAKAR, JULIAN WEBB 1.
INTRODUCTION 133 2. INSTITUTIONAL SETTING OF THE COURTS 133 2.1.
OVERVIEW OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS 133 2.2. JUDICIAL
APPOINTMENTS, TRAINING, ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCIPLINE 137 2.3. JUDICIAL
INDEPENDENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT - AN IMPORTANT CONTEXT 140 3.
COMMERCIAL LAW 141 3.1. FORMAL RULES AND PRACTICES 141 3.2. PRACTICAL
OPERATION OF FORMAL RULES 145 3.3 COMMENTARY 148 4. CRIMINAL LAW 149
4.1. THE STRUCTURE OF CRIMINAL COURTS 149 4.2. THE CRIMINAL CASE
MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK*JURY 2004 151 4.2.1. CASE MANAGEMENT AND LISTING
WITHIN THE CROWN COURT AND THE MAGISTRATES COURTS 151 4.2.2. LISTING OF
CASES AT THE CROWN COURT AND THE MAGISTRATES COURT 153 4.3 COMMENTARY
156 IX TABLE OF CONTENTS 5. SODAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNALS 158 5.1.
FORMAL RULES AND PRACTICES 158 5.2. PRACTICAL OPERATION OF FORMAL RULES
163 5.3. VIEWS ON ALLOCATION 165 5.4. COMMENTARY 168 6. FAMILY LAW 168
6.1. FORMAL RULES AND PRACTICES 168 6.2. PRACTICAL OPERATION OF FORMAL
RULES 174 6.3. VIEWS ON ALLOCATION 176 6.4. COMMENTARY 182 7. CONCLUSION
183 CHAPTER VII CASE ASSIGNMENT IN FRENCH COURTS DIDIER MARSHALL,
MATTHIAS GUYOMAR, LOIC CADIET, EMMANUEL JEULAND 189 1. INSTITUTIONAL
SETTING 189 1.1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FRENCH JUDICIAL SYSTEM 189 2.
RULES AND PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE ASSIGNMENT IN THE COURTS 190 2.1.
ORDINARY COURTS 190 2.2. ALLOCATION RULES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 191
2.3. SPECIFIC PROTECTION AGAINST JUDICIAL BIAS 192 3. PRACTICES AND
CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE COURTS RELATING TO CASE ASSIGNMENT 193 3.1.
ORDINARY COURTS 193 3.2. COMMERCIAL COURTS 198 3.3. LABOUR COURTS 200
3.4. ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 200 3.5. MASS LITIGATION 203 3.6.
HIGH-PROFILE CASES 204 3.7. COMMUNICATION OF INTERNAL CASE DISTRIBUTION
TO INTERESTED PARTIES 205 4. STAKEHOLDERS OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES
206 4.1. PROBLEMS 206 4.2. EVALUATION OF THE ACTUAL INTERNAL CASE
ASSIGNMENT BY JUDGES, AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF SAFEGUARDS OF JUDICIAL
INTEGRITY 207 4.3. PERCEPTION OF STAKEHOLDERS 211 5. EVALUATION 211
CHAPTER VIII CASE ASSIGNMENT IN GERMAN COURTS: NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA
215 PETER DYRCHS, WALTER FREY, PETER METZEN, REINER NAPIERALA, HANS
RAUSCH 1 INSTITUTIONAL SETTING 215 1.1. THE LEGAL JUDGE IN THE GERMAN
FEDERAL REPUBLIC, ITS ORIGIN AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANCHORING 215 1.2. THE
JUDICIAL ORGANISATION OF NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA 216 2. RULES AND
PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE ASSIGNMENT IN COURTS 218 2.1. THE CONCEPT,
SUBSTANCE AND AIM OF THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE LEGAL JUDGE 218 TABLE OF
CONTENTS 2.2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LEGISLATURE, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIARY
220 3. PRACTICES AND CONTEXTS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT IN NORTH
RHINE-WESTPHALIA 222 3.1. THE LEGAL CASE ASSIGNMENT PLAN 222 3.2. THE
ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO THE LEGAL JUDGE 223 3.3. CASE ASSIGNMENT IN
DIFFERENT COURTS 225 4. STAKEHOLDERS OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 228
4.1. PROBLEMS 228 4.2. NO CRITICISM 229 5. CONCLUSION 229 CHAPTER IX
CASE ASSIGNMENT IN ITALIAN COURTS 233 FRANCESCO CONTINI AND MARCO FABRI
1. INSTITUTIONAL SETTING 233 2. RULES AND PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE
ASSIGNMENT IN COURTS 243 2.1. THE RULES FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF CASES IN
ORDINARY COURTS 243 2.2. THE RULES FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF CASES IN
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 251 3. PRACTICES AND CONTEXTS OF CASES ASSIGNMENT
254 3.1. ORGANISATIONAL SCHEMATA IN ORDINARY COURTS PRACTICES 254 3.2.
SET OF CASES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS PRACTICES 261 4. STAKEHOLDERS
OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 263 4.1. STAKEHOLDERS OPINIONS AND
CRITICAL ISSUES IN THE ORDINARY COURTS 263 4.2. STAKEHOLDERS OPINIONS
AND CRITICAL ISSUES IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 266 5. CONCLUSION 266
XI
|
| adam_txt |
THE RIGHT JUDGE FOR EACH CASE A STUDY OF CASE ASSIGNMENT AND
IMPARTIALITY IN SIX EUROPEAN JUDICIARIES PHILIP M. LANGBROEK AND MARCO
FABRI INTERSENTIA METRO TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE PART 1: COMPARING 1
CHAPTER I THE RESEARCH PROJECT, DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 3 PHILIP M.
LANGBROEK AND MARCO FABRI 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. AIM AND OUTPUT OF THIS
RESEARCH PROJECT 5 3. PROJECT OUTLINE AND RESEARCH METHOD 5 4. THE
RESEARCH FORMAT 7 5. TERMINOLOGY 10 CHAPTER II INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT
AND JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 13 PHILIP M. LANGBROEK
AND MARCO FABRI 1. INTRODUCTION 13 2. VALUES 13 2.1. CONSTITUTIONAL
PERSPECTIVE: JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY,
ACCOUNTABILITY 13 2.2. ORGANISATIONAL PERCPECTIVE: EFFICIENCY,
FLEXIBILITY 16 2.3. PROFESSIONAL PERSPECTIVE: JUDICIAL INDEFINITENESS,
JUDICIAL AUTONOMY, EQUAL RECOGNITION, JUDICIAL AND JURIDICAL QUALITY 17
3. THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN VALUES AND INSTRUMENTS IN COURTS 19 3.1.
INDEPENDENCE AND AUTONOMY 19 3.2. SKILLS AND FLEXIBILITY 21 3.3.
FRATERNITY, AUTONOMY AND IMPARTIALITY 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4. CONCLUSION
23 4.1. THREE MAJOR TENSIONS FOR CASE ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS 23 4.2. A FINAL
WORD ON THE RELATIONS BETWEEN FEATURES OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM AND CASE
ASSIGNMENT 25 CHAPTER III A COMPARISON OF CASE ASSIGNMENT SYSTEMS IN SIX
EUROPEAN JUDICIARIES: DESCRIPTION AND COMPARATIVE GRID 27 MARCO FABRI
AND PHILIP M. LANGBROEK 1. INTRODUCTION 27 2. INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS OF
THE COURTS 28 3. PRINCIPLES AND GENERAL RULES 30 3.1. IUS DE NON
EVOCANDO 30 3.2. IMMOVABILITY OF JUDGES 31 3.3. CHALLENGING JUDGES AND
JUDICIAL RESIGNATION FROM A CASE 32 3.4. PRIMARY JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY
33 3.5. EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITIES 33 4. INTERNAL COURT ORGANISATION 34
4.1. SPECIALISED COURTS AND SPECIALISED COURT DIVISIONS AND UNITS 34
4.2. ALLOCATIONOF JUDGES WITHINA COURT AND BETWEEN COURTS 35 4.3. TASK
FORCES AND JUDGES' TRANSFERS 36 5. INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT 36 5.1. WHO
HAS ASSIGNMENT COMPETENCE? 36 5.2. ROLE OF THE HEADS OF ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS 37 5.3. HOW ARE CASES ASSIGNED TO THE JUDGES? 38 5.4. CASE
ASSIGNMENT AND JUDGE SHOPPING 39 5.5. INFORMAL EXCHANGE OF CASES BETWEEN
JUDGES 40 5.6. BALANCED CASELOADS 40 COMPARATIVE GRID: INTERNAL CASE
ASSIGNMENT IN SOME EUROPEAN JUDICIARIES 41 PART 2: CASE STUDIES 83
CHAPTER IV CASE ASSIGNMENT IN DANISH COURTS 85 EVA SMITH 1. INTRODUCTION
85 2. INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS 86 3. RULES TO ENHANCE AND PROTECT JUDICIAL
INTEGRITY AND IMPARTIALITY IN RELATION TO CASE ASSIGNMENT 89 4.
PRACTICES AND CONTEXTS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT IN DANISH COURTS 92 4.1.
DESCRIPTIONS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT PER COURT 93 4.2. SPECIFIC ISSUES 98 5.
STAKEHOLDERS' OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 100 5.1. PUBLIC OPINION 100
TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.2. EVALUATION OF THE ACTUAL INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT
BY JUDGES, AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF SAF EGUARDS OF JUDICIAL INTEGRITY
101 6. CONCLUSION 102 CHAPTER V CASE ASSIGNMENT IN DUTCH COURTS 105
PHILIP M. LANGBROEK 1. INSTITUTIONAL SETTING 105 1.1. ORGANISATIONAL
ARRANGEMENTS 105 2. RULES AND PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE ASSIGNMENT IN
COURTS 108 2.1. INCORPORATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE DUTCH LEGAL
SYSTEM 108 2.2. LUS DE NON EVOCANDO 109 2.3. LEGAL PROVISIONS ENHANCING
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY 109 3. PRACTICES AND
CONTEXTS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT 112 3.1. ENHANCING JUDICIAL INTEGRITY 112
3.2. PRACTICES OF INTERNAL CASE ASSIGNMENT IN THE NETHERLANDS 113 4.
STAKEHOLDERS' OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 124 4.1. CRITICISM 124 4.2.
EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL INTEGRITY BY JUDGES, COURT MANAGEMENT AND
STAKEHOLDERS 127 5. CONCLUSION 127 5.1. DUTCH COURTS UNDER PRESSURE 128
5.2. REDUCTION OF PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY 129 5.3. BETWEEN PROFESSIONAL
AUTONOMY AND PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY 130 CHAPTER VI CASE ASSIGNMENT IN
ENGLISH COURTS 133 JOHN FLOOD, AVIS WHYTE, REZA BANAKAR, JULIAN WEBB 1.
INTRODUCTION 133 2. INSTITUTIONAL SETTING OF THE COURTS 133 2.1.
OVERVIEW OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS 133 2.2. JUDICIAL
APPOINTMENTS, TRAINING, ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCIPLINE 137 2.3. JUDICIAL
INDEPENDENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT - AN IMPORTANT CONTEXT 140 3.
COMMERCIAL LAW 141 3.1. FORMAL RULES AND PRACTICES 141 3.2. PRACTICAL
OPERATION OF FORMAL RULES 145 3.3 COMMENTARY 148 4. CRIMINAL LAW 149
4.1. THE STRUCTURE OF CRIMINAL COURTS 149 4.2. THE CRIMINAL CASE
MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK*JURY 2004 151 4.2.1. CASE MANAGEMENT AND LISTING
WITHIN THE CROWN COURT AND THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS 151 4.2.2. LISTING OF
CASES AT THE CROWN COURT AND THE MAGISTRATES' COURT 153 4.3 COMMENTARY
156 IX TABLE OF CONTENTS 5. SODAL SECURITY APPEAL TRIBUNALS 158 5.1.
FORMAL RULES AND PRACTICES 158 5.2. PRACTICAL OPERATION OF FORMAL RULES
163 5.3. VIEWS ON ALLOCATION 165 5.4. COMMENTARY 168 6. FAMILY LAW 168
6.1. FORMAL RULES AND PRACTICES 168 6.2. PRACTICAL OPERATION OF FORMAL
RULES 174 6.3. VIEWS ON ALLOCATION 176 6.4. COMMENTARY 182 7. CONCLUSION
183 CHAPTER VII CASE ASSIGNMENT IN FRENCH COURTS DIDIER MARSHALL,
MATTHIAS GUYOMAR, LOIC CADIET, EMMANUEL JEULAND 189 1. INSTITUTIONAL
SETTING 189 1.1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FRENCH JUDICIAL SYSTEM 189 2.
RULES AND PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE ASSIGNMENT IN THE COURTS 190 2.1.
ORDINARY COURTS 190 2.2. ALLOCATION RULES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 191
2.3. SPECIFIC PROTECTION AGAINST JUDICIAL BIAS 192 3. PRACTICES AND
CIRCUMSTANCES IN THE COURTS RELATING TO CASE ASSIGNMENT 193 3.1.
ORDINARY COURTS 193 3.2. COMMERCIAL COURTS 198 3.3. LABOUR COURTS 200
3.4. ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 200 3.5. MASS LITIGATION 203 3.6.
HIGH-PROFILE CASES 204 3.7. COMMUNICATION OF INTERNAL CASE DISTRIBUTION
TO INTERESTED PARTIES 205 4. STAKEHOLDERS' OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES
206 4.1. PROBLEMS 206 4.2. EVALUATION OF THE ACTUAL INTERNAL CASE
ASSIGNMENT BY JUDGES, AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF SAFEGUARDS OF JUDICIAL
INTEGRITY 207 4.3. PERCEPTION OF STAKEHOLDERS 211 5. EVALUATION 211
CHAPTER VIII CASE ASSIGNMENT IN GERMAN COURTS: NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA
215 PETER DYRCHS, WALTER FREY, PETER METZEN, REINER NAPIERALA, HANS
RAUSCH 1 INSTITUTIONAL SETTING 215 1.1. THE LEGAL JUDGE IN THE GERMAN
FEDERAL REPUBLIC, ITS ORIGIN AND CONSTITUTIONAL ANCHORING 215 1.2. THE
JUDICIAL ORGANISATION OF NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA 216 2. RULES AND
PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE ASSIGNMENT IN COURTS 218 2.1. THE CONCEPT,
SUBSTANCE AND AIM OF THE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO THE LEGAL JUDGE 218 TABLE OF
CONTENTS 2.2. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LEGISLATURE, EXECUTIVE AND JUDICIARY
220 3. PRACTICES AND CONTEXTS OF CASE ASSIGNMENT IN NORTH
RHINE-WESTPHALIA 222 3.1. THE LEGAL CASE ASSIGNMENT PLAN 222 3.2. THE
ENFORCEMENT OF THE RIGHT TO THE LEGAL JUDGE 223 3.3. CASE ASSIGNMENT IN
DIFFERENT COURTS 225 4. STAKEHOLDERS' OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 228
4.1. PROBLEMS 228 4.2. NO CRITICISM 229 5. CONCLUSION 229 CHAPTER IX
CASE ASSIGNMENT IN ITALIAN COURTS 233 FRANCESCO CONTINI AND MARCO FABRI
1. INSTITUTIONAL SETTING 233 2. RULES AND PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CASE
ASSIGNMENT IN COURTS 243 2.1. THE RULES FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF CASES IN
ORDINARY COURTS 243 2.2. THE RULES FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF CASES IN
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 251 3. PRACTICES AND CONTEXTS OF CASES ASSIGNMENT
254 3.1. ORGANISATIONAL SCHEMATA IN ORDINARY COURTS' PRACTICES 254 3.2.
SET OF CASES IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS' PRACTICES 261 4. STAKEHOLDERS'
OPINIONS AND CRITICAL ISSUES 263 4.1. STAKEHOLDERS' OPINIONS AND
CRITICAL ISSUES IN THE ORDINARY COURTS 263 4.2. STAKEHOLDERS' OPINIONS
AND CRITICAL ISSUES IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 266 5. CONCLUSION 266
XI |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1032999799 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022620386 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJC3666 |
| callnumber-raw | KJC3666 |
| callnumber-search | KJC3666 |
| callnumber-sort | KJC 43666 |
| classification_rvk | PS 3840 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255601346 (DE-599)BSZ261241451 |
| dewey-full | 347.4014 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.4014 |
| dewey-search | 347.4014 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.4014 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01686nam a2200445 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022620386</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20160122 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070823s2007 d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9050956505</subfield><subfield code="9">90-5095-650-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789050956505</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-5095-650-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255601346</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ261241451</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC3666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.4014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3840</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139792:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The right judge for each case</subfield><subfield code="b">a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries</subfield><subfield code="c">Philip M. Langbroek ... [eds. and research directors]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Antwerpen [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Intersentia [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 270 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ius commune europaeum</subfield><subfield code="v">57</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court administration - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court calendars - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Courts - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judges - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justice, Administration of - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Richter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unabhängigkeit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Langbroek, Philip M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1955-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1032999799</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ius commune europaeum</subfield><subfield code="v">57</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV010118502</subfield><subfield code="9">57</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015826459&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015826459</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV022620386 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T18:19:52Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:01:50Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9050956505 9789050956505 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015826459 |
| oclc_num | 255601346 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 DE-12 DE-188 DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-12 DE-188 DE-739 |
| physical | XI, 270 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Intersentia [u.a.] |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Ius commune europaeum |
| series2 | Ius commune europaeum |
| spelling | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries Philip M. Langbroek ... [eds. and research directors] Antwerpen [u.a.] Intersentia [u.a.] 2007 XI, 270 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Ius commune europaeum 57 Court administration - Europe Court calendars - Europe Courts - Europe Judges - Europe Justice, Administration of - Europe Rechtsvergleich Richter Unabhängigkeit Langbroek, Philip M. 1955- Sonstige (DE-588)1032999799 oth Ius commune europaeum 57 (DE-604)BV010118502 57 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015826459&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries Ius commune europaeum Court administration - Europe Court calendars - Europe Courts - Europe Judges - Europe Justice, Administration of - Europe Rechtsvergleich Richter Unabhängigkeit |
| title | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries |
| title_auth | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries |
| title_exact_search | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries |
| title_full | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries Philip M. Langbroek ... [eds. and research directors] |
| title_fullStr | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries Philip M. Langbroek ... [eds. and research directors] |
| title_full_unstemmed | The right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries Philip M. Langbroek ... [eds. and research directors] |
| title_short | The right judge for each case |
| title_sort | the right judge for each case a study of case assignment and impartiality in six european judiciaries |
| title_sub | a study of case assignment and impartiality in six European judiciaries |
| topic | Court administration - Europe Court calendars - Europe Courts - Europe Judges - Europe Justice, Administration of - Europe Rechtsvergleich Richter Unabhängigkeit |
| topic_facet | Court administration - Europe Court calendars - Europe Courts - Europe Judges - Europe Justice, Administration of - Europe Rechtsvergleich Richter Unabhängigkeit |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015826459&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV010118502 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT langbroekphilipm therightjudgeforeachcaseastudyofcaseassignmentandimpartialityinsixeuropeanjudiciaries |