Interface between EU law and national law: proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Groningen
Europa Law Publ.
2007
|
| Schriftenreihe: | The Hogendorp papers
7 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XX, 389 S. |
| ISBN: | 9789076871721 9076871728 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022617868 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20150619 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 070821s2007 ne |||| 10||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2007438599 | ||
| 020 | |a 9789076871721 |9 978-90-76871-72-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 9076871728 |9 90-76871-72-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)156875440 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022617868 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a ne |c NL | ||
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-12 |a DE-703 |a DE-384 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJE969 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.242 | |
| 084 | |a PS 2420 |0 (DE-625)139712: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Interface between EU law and national law |b proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies |c ed. by D. Obradovic ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a Groningen |b Europa Law Publ. |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a XX, 389 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a The Hogendorp papers |v 7 | |
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a Europäische Union |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a European Union |z Netherlands |v Congresses |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |z European Union countries |v Congresses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International and municipal law |z European Union countries |v Congresses | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Subsidiarity |v Congresses | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verwaltungskompetenz |0 (DE-588)4135117-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzgebungskompetenz |0 (DE-588)4071795-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Umsetzung |g Beamtenrecht |0 (DE-588)4204162-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Niederlande | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |y 2006 |z Amsterdam |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gesetzgebungskompetenz |0 (DE-588)4071795-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Verwaltungskompetenz |0 (DE-588)4135117-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Umsetzung |g Beamtenrecht |0 (DE-588)4204162-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Obradovic, Daniela |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)138828377 |4 oth | |
| 830 | 0 | |a The Hogendorp papers |v 7 |w (DE-604)BV017662718 |9 7 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Augsburg |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015823976&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015823976 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820135759841067008 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
PART I
CHAPTER I.I
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations of Journal Titles
Introduction
Constitutional Issues
The European Court of Justice and the Division of
Competence in the European Union
Ronald van Ooik
V
XVÜ
ι
Introduction
2
Exclusive competence
2.1
Areas of exclusive competence
2.
1.1
The concept of an area of exclusive competence
2.1.2
External exclusive competence
2.2
Nature and meaning of'exclusivity' of Community powers
2.3
Delineations within the field of exclusive EC competences
3
Shared competence
3.1
The areas of shared competence
3.2
What does sharing of competences mean?
3.2.1
The EC is still silent
3.2.2
Brussels awakes
3.2.3
Brussels retreats
3.2.4
Exceptions to the system
3.3
The Court of Justice and shared competence
4
Complementary competence of the EC
4.1
The areas concerned
4.2
Meaning of complementary competence
4.3
The Court of Justice and complementary competences
5
Residual competence of the EC/EU
6
Cross-categorical litigation before the Court of Justice
6.1
Exclusive versus shared competence
6.2
Exclusive versus complementary competence
6.3
Exclusive versus residual competence
6.4
Shared competence or complementary competence?
6.5
Shared versus residual EC/EU competence
6.6
Complementary or residual competence?
7
Concluding remarks
13
Ч
Ч
15
15
17
19
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
30
34
34
35
35
36
37
37
38
chapter
ín
Integration by Stealth: On the Exclusivity of Community
Competence; A Comment on the Ronald van Ooik
Contribution
Ramses
Wessel
ι
Introduction
43
2
Exclusive competence
44
3
Shared competence
45
4
Complementary competence
47
5
Residual competence
48
6
Conclusion
48
chapter
и.
1
The Interface between EC Rules on Public Participation in
Environmental Decision-Making Operating at the
European and National Levels
Daniela
Obradovic
1
Introduction
2
Disparities between EC rules governing national and
European level consultations with interest groups on
environmental matters prior to the EC accession to the
Aarhus Convention
3
Disparities between EC rules governing national and
European level consultations with interest groups in the
area of environmental decision-making subsequently to the
approval of the Aarhus Convention by the EC
3.1
Transposition of the Aarhus requirements in EC law
3.2
Consultation standards
3.3
The enforcement of participation rights
3.3.1
The internal review
3.3.2
The judicial review at the EC level
3.3.3
The distinction between the criteria for commencing
administrative and judicial review by
NGOs
for the purpose
of protecting their Aarhus participation rights at the EC level
66
3.3.4
The justiciability of the Commissions minimum standards
for consulting interested parties
3.3.5
The distinction between national and EC level conditions to
be meet by
NGOs
indenting to protect their Aarhus
participation rights in courts
4
Recommendations for the elimination of the discrepancies
between the
EU
and national level eligibility criteria for the
consumption and enforcement of the Aarhus participation
rights by interest groups
72
53
53
68
70
CHAPTER II.II
I
2
3
4
5
CHAPTER
ПІ.І
Tensions
in Decision-Making Processes Relating to the
Environment: The Role of Public Participation; A
Comment on the
Daniela
Obradovic Contribution
Nicolas
de Sadeleer
Introductory remarks
From international to EC law
From EC to national law: much leeway to the Member States
A double-edged sword for developers and public authorities
A shift from representative democracy to a new technocracy?
83
A threat to scientific expertise?
84
Participation in the face of uncertainty
84
Participation in the field of product policy
85
Interface between the European Union and Its Member
States in Union Public Finances
Thomas
Beukers
79
79
81
82
I
2
3
4
5
б
Introduction
The European Union and its Member States: budget and
budgetary procedure
Decision-making on Union finances
From annual to multiannual budget planning: explaining
the historical shift
Interface between the European Union and its Member
States in public finances
European Council agreement linking revenue and
expenditure
Incorporation of a European Council agreement in an
interinstitutional agreement
Conclusions
90
92
94
96
99
100
PART
Substantive Issues
Safeguarding National Identity in Community Legislation
CHAPTER IV.I
Annette Schrauwen
I
Respect for national identity
2
Food regulation
3
Wine
4
Cheese
5
Chocolate
6
Snus
7
Cultural policy
107
no
112
113
"4
n8
120
9
io
CHAPTER V.I
Language regulation
Social security regulation
Concluding remarks
122
126
129
I
2
2.1
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.5.I
2.5.2
3
3-і
3.2
3-3
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
5
5-і
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
5.1.5
5.2
The Impact of EMU Law on National Budgetary Freedom;
An Inquiry into the Limits of State Sovereignty in
Economic Policy Matters
René Smits
Introduction
State
of the law: economic union
Who is competent: monetary union versus economic
union plus internal market
General economic policy coordination: principles,
prohibitions, provisions and procedures
General: the four 'P's'
Principles
Prohibitions
Provisions and procedures
Community policy measures
Fiscal policy framework: reasons, rules and procedure
Application to all Member States with special rules for Euro
zone members
Stability and Growth Pact
Original texts
2005
amendments
Practical experience with the EDP and the
SGP
EDP and
SGP
experience
Stand-off in
2003
ECJ judgment in
2004
European Constitution
Amendments to economic union texts
Voting rules
Missed opportunity
Prospects
Proposals for strengthening economic union
Within the current context
Statistical data gathering and review
'Agreed overruling': the case of Germany in
2006
Intensified application of Article
100(1)
EC
Acceptance of Union pre-emption of fiscal parameters
(Wellink
doctrine)
Aligned decision-making on economic policy
-
policy mix
proposals by EEAG
Outside the current context
133
133
133
135
135
135
136
136
138
138
143
144
44
146
152
156
156
157
158
158
159
159
159
160
160
161
162
163
5.2.1
Stronger role for the Commission as overseer of fiscal
prudence
163
5.2.2
Republique
européenne
proposals:
EP
sets limits for States'
budgets
τ
63
5.2.3
New voting arrangements excluding deficit States
164
6
Conclusions
165
7
Recommendations
165
7.1
Testing some suggested improvements and preparing for
future Treaty changes
165
7.2
Single representation of
EU
at international level
тбб
7.3
Further inroads into national law: payments
167
7.4
Correcting EMU's basic division and fulfilling EMU's
potential
167
chapter
vii Integration,
Coordination or Fragmentation in Economic
Policy Matters? A Comment on the
René Smits
Contribution
Fabian Amtenbrink
1
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
3
CHAPTER VI.I
Introduction
European Economic and Monetary Union: A case of
integration, coordination or fragmentation?
Legal framework
Practice
Fragmentation rather than integration or coordination
Impact of EMU's multilevel system of economic governance
on democratic legitimacy
Conclusions
171
173
173
177
179
181
184
Interface: EC and Dutch Competition Law
-
In Which
Fields or Areas Would the Netherlands Still Have
Autonomous Regulating Powers? And Would It Be Wise
to Use Those Powers?
Floris
Vogelaar
The basic legal framework after the modernisation
187
Recent developments and trends in the Netherlands
188
Application of Article
3(2)
of Regulation
1/2003
ш
tne
Netherlands
190
Exemptions from the national cartel prohibition
192
Article
3(3)
of Regulation
1/2003
and national concentration
control
195
Freedom to determine a national type of sanctioning
-
the
criminal law route
196
Private enforcement: very complex choices to be made
199
chapter vi.ii The Interface between EC Competition Law and the
Competition Laws of the New Member States:
Implementation or Innovation?
Katalin Cseres
ι
Introduction
205
2
The relevance of this research: competition law and the
CEECs
205
3
Competition law in the new Member States
206
3.1
The road to accession
206
3.2
The effect of modernisation of EC competition law: what
room is left for national competition laws?
209
3.2.1
Accession and transitional rules
209
4
Implementation of competition law in the CEECs
212
4.1
Substantive issues
215
4.2
Specific characteristics of the CEECs and their implications
for competition law
216
4.2.1
Different economic setting and economic goals
216
4.2.1.1
Small economies
216
4.2.1.2
Transition economies: diverging focus of competition law
in transition
economie
s
218
4.3
Comparison: convergence or divergence?
220
5
Law in the books v. effective enforcement
226
6
What lessons can be learned from the CEECs case for
future enlargement and the EC competition policy design
230
part
3
Domestic Effects of European Law
chapter
vu.
1
The Application of Community Precedent and
Acte Clair
by the
Hoge Raad;
A Case Study in the Field of
Establishment and Services
Herman van
Harten
1
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3
3·1
3·2
3-3
Introduction
Community precedent and
acte clair
Precedent in Community law
237
238
238
The classic preliminary reference system and the obligation
239
The jurisprudential exceptions: the Cilfit doctrine
239
The actuality of the Cilfit doctrine
241
Establishment and services
242
Definition and applicability
243
The qualification of the restriction
244
The applicability of a justification and the principle of
proportionality
246
4
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4-3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4-3-3
4.3.4
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
4.4.4
5
б
Community precedent and
acte clair
applied
The maximum age of a Member of the Supervisory Board;
Judgment of
8
May
1998
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
A case with similarities to Alpine Investments without
mentioning it; Judgment of
z
February
1999
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
The Albany case at the
Hoge Raad
before the Court
delivered its judgment in this case; Judgment of
5
February
1999
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
The Rotterdam parking fine case, the Dutch chip card
(chipknip)
as the only way to pay a parking ticket; Judgment
of
8
July
2005
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
Concluding remarks
Towards decentralized responsibility: exceptions as a rule?
246
247
247
247
248
248
249
249
250
250
251
251
251
252
254
254
255
255
256
257
258
258
259
chapter
vín.n
National Case Law in the Field of Free Movement of
Services and the Freedom of Establishment: Is the Time
Ripe for a Change in the Cilfit Doctrine? A Comment on
the Herman van
Harten
Contribution
Johan
van
de Gronden
ι
Introduction
265
2
What approach does Van
Harten
take in his paper?
265
3
Developments in the
EU
law on services and establishment
267
4
How did the
Hoge Raad
deal with the developments in
the free movement case law?
269
4.1
The
Westerterp
and
Tolman
case
270
4.2
The Dutch Act on the Supervision of the Securities Trade case
270
4.3
The Albany case
271
4-4
The Rotterdam parking fine case
5
Concluding remarks
chapter
vin.i
State Liability: In Search of a Dividing Line between
National and European Law
Jan H. Jans
ι
Introduction
2
The existence of state liability as a matter of principle
3
Setting the conditions for Francovic/t-liability
3.1
Liability under more stringent conditions
3.2
Lowering the standards for liability
4
Applying the principle and its conditions
4.1
Serious breach
4.2
Rights for individuals
4.3
Causality
4.4
Summing up
5
Applying procedural rules
5.1
The qualification of the remedy according national law
5.2
Extent of the reparation
5.3
How to allocate liability internally
5.4
Violating the Rewe/Comet rule of effectiveness
6
Concluding remarks
chapter
νια.π
Beyond Francovich: Completing the Unified Member State
and
EU
Liability Regime; A Comment on the Jan Jans
Contribution
Gerrit
Betlem
273
3
274
3-і
4
4.1
4.2
4.2.1
281
281
4.2.2
284
4.2.3
284
4.3
285
4.4
287
4-5
287
4.6
288
289
5
290
5-і
291
5·2
292
293
294
CHAPTER IX.II
294
295
I
2
3
3-і
3.2
3-3
3.4
3-5
CHAPTER IX.I
Legal bases of Francovich
Liability of the EC in the absence of unlawfulness
State liability for breach of Union law
Absence of direct effect
Consistent interpretation indirectly inherent in
EU
Treaty
Levels of European integration
State liability for breach of
ЕЕ
A law
The Constitutional Treaty
299
300
301
301
302
304
305
308
Domestic Legal Effects of
EU
Criminal Law: A Transfer of
EC Law Doctrines?
Jolande Prinssen
Introduction: the (new) legal architecture of the PJCC area
313
Character of third pillar measures
314
1
2
3
4
5
CHAPTER X.I
I
I.I
1.2
2
2.1
2.
1.1
2.1.2
Extended jurisdiction of the ECJ in the third pillar
315
ECJ's debut in the third pillar
317
Can the doctrines on the domestic legal effects of European
law be transferred to the PJCC instruments?
318
Introducing the primary principles of European law
318
The principle of consistent interpretation
320
Interpretation in conformity with framework decisions: the
Pupino case
320
Scope of the interpretative obligation (in criminal matters)
321
Broader implications
322
Direct effect
323
Supremacy
325
State liability
326
Judicial protection under national law: European law
requirements
327
Concluding remarks
328
Rapprochement of third pillar law with EC law
328
Domestic legal effects of
EU
criminal law: limitations and
prospects
329
Domestic Legal Effects on
EU
Criminal Law: Variations on
Three Themes; A Comment on the Jolande Prinssen
Contribution
Sacha Prêchai
Introduction
The paradox of direct effect
Supremacy put in perspective
Fundamental rights
acquis
Creeping depillarisation
335
335
337
341
343
The Interface between European and National Procedural
Law: UN Sanctions and Judicial Review
Nikolaos Lavranos
The legal framework
349
UN Security Council Resolutions in the Community legal
order
349
ECJ jurisprudence on UN Security Council Resolutions
350
The interface between European and national procedural
law
353
Review of UN sanctions before the CFI/ECJ
353
Hierarchy of norms in the Community legal order
355
Invalidating EC Regulation
357
2.2
Review
of UN
sanctions
before the ECrtHR
358
2.3
The consequences for the national courts
361
3
Conclusions
364
chapter
xii
The International Community, the European Union and
Its Member States; A Comment on the Nikolaos Lavranos
Contribution
fames Kingston
1
Introduction
369
2
The emerging structure of public international law
369
3
The interface between the United Nations Charter and
regional and domestic legal systems
372
3.1
European Union law
372
3.2
European Convention on Human Rights
377
3.3
Domestic legal systems
380
4
Action at UN Level
381
5
Conclusions
383
Index
386 |
| adam_txt |
PART I
CHAPTER I.I
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations of Journal Titles
Introduction
Constitutional Issues
The European Court of Justice and the Division of
Competence in the European Union
Ronald van Ooik
V
XVÜ
ι
Introduction
2
Exclusive competence
2.1
Areas of exclusive competence
2.
1.1
The concept of an area of exclusive competence
2.1.2
External exclusive competence
2.2
Nature and meaning of'exclusivity' of Community powers
2.3
Delineations within the field of exclusive EC competences
3
Shared competence
3.1
The areas of shared competence
3.2
What does sharing of competences mean?
3.2.1
The EC is still silent
3.2.2
Brussels awakes
3.2.3
Brussels retreats
3.2.4
Exceptions to the system
3.3
The Court of Justice and shared competence
4
Complementary competence of the EC
4.1
The areas concerned
4.2
Meaning of complementary competence
4.3
The Court of Justice and complementary competences
5
Residual competence of the EC/EU
6
Cross-categorical litigation before the Court of Justice
6.1
Exclusive versus shared competence
6.2
Exclusive versus complementary competence
6.3
Exclusive versus residual competence
6.4
Shared competence or complementary competence?
6.5
Shared versus residual EC/EU competence
6.6
Complementary or residual competence?
7
Concluding remarks
13
Ч
Ч
15
15
17
19
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
30
34
34
35
35
36
37
37
38
chapter
ín
Integration by Stealth: On the Exclusivity of Community
Competence; A Comment on the Ronald van Ooik
Contribution
Ramses
Wessel
ι
Introduction
43
2
Exclusive competence
44
3
Shared competence
45
4
Complementary competence
47
5
Residual competence
48
6
Conclusion
48
chapter
и.
1
The Interface between EC Rules on Public Participation in
Environmental Decision-Making Operating at the
European and National Levels
Daniela
Obradovic
1
Introduction
2
Disparities between EC rules governing national and
European level consultations with interest groups on
environmental matters prior to the EC accession to the
Aarhus Convention
3
Disparities between EC rules governing national and
European level consultations with interest groups in the
area of environmental decision-making subsequently to the
approval of the Aarhus Convention by the EC
3.1
Transposition of the Aarhus requirements in EC law
3.2
Consultation standards
3.3
The enforcement of participation rights
3.3.1
The internal review
3.3.2
The judicial review at the EC level
3.3.3
The distinction between the criteria for commencing
administrative and judicial review by
NGOs
for the purpose
of protecting their Aarhus participation rights at the EC level
66
3.3.4
The justiciability of the Commissions minimum standards
for consulting interested parties
3.3.5
The distinction between national and EC level conditions to
be meet by
NGOs
indenting to protect their Aarhus
participation rights in courts
4
Recommendations for the elimination of the discrepancies
between the
EU
and national level eligibility criteria for the
consumption and enforcement of the Aarhus participation
rights by interest groups
72
53
53
68
70
CHAPTER II.II
I
2
3
4
5
CHAPTER
ПІ.І
Tensions
in Decision-Making Processes Relating to the
Environment: The Role of Public Participation; A
Comment on the
Daniela
Obradovic Contribution
Nicolas
de Sadeleer
Introductory remarks
From international to EC law
From EC to national law: much leeway to the Member States
A double-edged sword for developers and public authorities
A shift from representative democracy to a new technocracy?
83
A threat to scientific expertise?
84
Participation in the face of uncertainty
84
Participation in the field of product policy
85
Interface between the European Union and Its Member
States in Union Public Finances
Thomas
Beukers
79
79
81
82
I
2
3
4
5
б
Introduction
The European Union and its Member States: budget and
budgetary procedure
Decision-making on Union finances
From annual to multiannual budget planning: explaining
the historical shift
Interface between the European Union and its Member
States in public finances
European Council agreement linking revenue and
expenditure
Incorporation of a European Council agreement in an
interinstitutional agreement
Conclusions
90
92
94
96
99
100
PART
Substantive Issues
Safeguarding National Identity in Community Legislation
CHAPTER IV.I
Annette Schrauwen
I
Respect for national identity
2
Food regulation
3
Wine
4
Cheese
5
Chocolate
6
Snus
7
Cultural policy
107
no
112
113
"4
n8
120
9
io
CHAPTER V.I
Language regulation
Social security regulation
Concluding remarks
122
126
129
I
2
2.1
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
2.2.5
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.5.I
2.5.2
3
3-і
3.2
3-3
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
5
5-і
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
5.1.4
5.1.5
5.2
The Impact of EMU Law on National Budgetary Freedom;
An Inquiry into the Limits of State Sovereignty in
Economic Policy Matters
René Smits
Introduction
State
of the law: economic union
Who is competent: monetary union versus economic
union plus internal market
General economic policy coordination: principles,
prohibitions, provisions and procedures
General: the four 'P's'
Principles
Prohibitions
Provisions and procedures
Community policy measures
Fiscal policy framework: reasons, rules and procedure
Application to all Member States with special rules for Euro
zone members
Stability and Growth Pact
Original texts
2005
amendments
Practical experience with the EDP and the
SGP
EDP and
SGP
experience
Stand-off in
2003
ECJ judgment in
2004
European Constitution
Amendments to economic union texts
Voting rules
Missed opportunity
Prospects
Proposals for strengthening economic union
Within the current context
Statistical data gathering and review
'Agreed overruling': the case of Germany in
2006
Intensified application of Article
100(1)
EC
Acceptance of Union pre-emption of fiscal parameters
(Wellink
doctrine)
Aligned decision-making on economic policy
-
policy mix
proposals by EEAG
Outside the current context
133
133
133
135
135
135
136
136
138
138
143
144
44
146
152
156
156
157
158
158
159
159
159
160
160
161
162
163
5.2.1
Stronger role for the Commission as overseer of fiscal
prudence
163
5.2.2
Republique
européenne
proposals:
EP
sets limits for States'
budgets
τ
63
5.2.3
New voting arrangements excluding deficit States
164
6
Conclusions
165
7
Recommendations
165
7.1
Testing some suggested improvements and preparing for
future Treaty changes
165
7.2
Single representation of
EU
at international level
тбб
7.3
Further inroads into national law: payments
167
7.4
Correcting EMU's basic division and fulfilling EMU's
potential
167
chapter
vii Integration,
Coordination or Fragmentation in Economic
Policy Matters? A Comment on the
René Smits
Contribution
Fabian Amtenbrink
1
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
3
CHAPTER VI.I
Introduction
European Economic and Monetary Union: A case of
integration, coordination or fragmentation?
Legal framework
Practice
Fragmentation rather than integration or coordination
Impact of EMU's multilevel system of economic governance
on democratic legitimacy
Conclusions
171
173
173
177
179
181
184
Interface: EC and Dutch Competition Law
-
In Which
Fields or Areas Would the Netherlands Still Have
Autonomous Regulating Powers? And Would It Be Wise
to Use Those Powers?
Floris
Vogelaar
The basic legal framework after the modernisation
187
Recent developments and trends in the Netherlands
188
Application of Article
3(2)
of Regulation
1/2003
ш
tne
Netherlands
190
Exemptions from the national cartel prohibition
192
Article
3(3)
of Regulation
1/2003
and national concentration
control
195
Freedom to determine a national type of sanctioning
-
the
criminal law route
196
Private enforcement: very complex choices to be made
199
chapter vi.ii The Interface between EC Competition Law and the
Competition Laws of the New Member States:
Implementation or Innovation?
Katalin Cseres
ι
Introduction
205
2
The relevance of this research: competition law and the
CEECs
205
3
Competition law in the new Member States
206
3.1
The road to accession
206
3.2
The effect of modernisation of EC competition law: what
room is left for national competition laws?
209
3.2.1
Accession and transitional rules
209
4
Implementation of competition law in the CEECs
212
4.1
Substantive issues
215
4.2
Specific characteristics of the CEECs and their implications
for competition law
216
4.2.1
Different economic setting and economic goals
216
4.2.1.1
Small economies
216
4.2.1.2
Transition economies: diverging focus of competition law
in transition
economie
s
218
4.3
Comparison: convergence or divergence?
220
5
Law in the books v. effective enforcement
226
6
What lessons can be learned from the CEECs case for
future enlargement and the EC competition policy design
230
part
3
Domestic Effects of European Law
chapter
vu.
1
The Application of Community Precedent and
Acte Clair
by the
Hoge Raad;
A Case Study in the Field of
Establishment and Services
Herman van
Harten
1
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3
3·1
3·2
3-3
Introduction
Community precedent and
acte clair
Precedent in Community law
237
238
238
The classic preliminary reference system and the obligation
239
The jurisprudential exceptions: the Cilfit doctrine
239
The actuality of the Cilfit doctrine
241
Establishment and services
242
Definition and applicability
243
The qualification of the restriction
244
The applicability of a justification and the principle of
proportionality
246
4
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.2
4.2.1
4.2.2
4.2.3
4.2.4
4-3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4-3-3
4.3.4
4.4
4.4.1
4.4.2
4.4.3
4.4.4
5
б
Community precedent and
acte clair
applied
The maximum age of a Member of the Supervisory Board;
Judgment of
8
May
1998
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
A case with similarities to Alpine Investments without
mentioning it; Judgment of
z
February
1999
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
The Albany case at the
Hoge Raad
before the Court
delivered its judgment in this case; Judgment of
5
February
1999
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
The Rotterdam parking fine case, the Dutch chip card
(chipknip)
as the only way to pay a parking ticket; Judgment
of
8
July
2005
Factual background and proceedings
AG
Hoge Raad
Commentary
Concluding remarks
Towards decentralized responsibility: exceptions as a rule?
246
247
247
247
248
248
249
249
250
250
251
251
251
252
254
254
255
255
256
257
258
258
259
chapter
vín.n
National Case Law in the Field of Free Movement of
Services and the Freedom of Establishment: Is the Time
Ripe for a Change in the Cilfit Doctrine? A Comment on
the Herman van
Harten
Contribution
Johan
van
de Gronden
ι
Introduction
265
2
What approach does Van
Harten
take in his paper?
265
3
Developments in the
EU
law on services and establishment
267
4
How did the
Hoge Raad
deal with the developments in
the free movement case law?
269
4.1
The
Westerterp
and
Tolman
case
270
4.2
The Dutch Act on the Supervision of the Securities Trade case
270
4.3
The Albany case
271
4-4
The Rotterdam parking fine case
5
Concluding remarks
chapter
vin.i
State Liability: In Search of a Dividing Line between
National and European Law
Jan H. Jans
ι
Introduction
2
The existence of state liability as a matter of principle
3
Setting the conditions for Francovic/t-liability
3.1
Liability under more stringent conditions
3.2
Lowering the standards for liability
4
Applying the principle and its conditions
4.1
Serious breach
4.2
Rights for individuals
4.3
Causality
4.4
Summing up
5
Applying procedural rules
5.1
The qualification of the remedy according national law
5.2
Extent of the reparation
5.3
How to allocate liability internally
5.4
Violating the Rewe/Comet rule of effectiveness
6
Concluding remarks
chapter
νια.π
Beyond Francovich: Completing the Unified Member State
and
EU
Liability Regime; A Comment on the Jan Jans
Contribution
Gerrit
Betlem
273
3
274
3-і
4
4.1
4.2
4.2.1
281
281
4.2.2
284
4.2.3
284
4.3
285
4.4
287
4-5
287
4.6
288
289
5
290
5-і
291
5·2
292
293
294
CHAPTER IX.II
294
295
I
2
3
3-і
3.2
3-3
3.4
3-5
CHAPTER IX.I
Legal bases of Francovich
Liability of the EC in the absence of unlawfulness
State liability for breach of Union law
Absence of direct effect
Consistent interpretation indirectly inherent in
EU
Treaty
Levels of European integration
State liability for breach of
ЕЕ
A law
The Constitutional Treaty
299
300
301
301
302
304
305
308
Domestic Legal Effects of
EU
Criminal Law: A Transfer of
EC Law Doctrines?
Jolande Prinssen
Introduction: the (new) legal architecture of the PJCC area
313
Character of third pillar measures
314
1
2
3
4
5
CHAPTER X.I
I
I.I
1.2
2
2.1
2.
1.1
2.1.2
Extended jurisdiction of the ECJ in the third pillar
315
ECJ's debut in the third pillar
317
Can the doctrines on the domestic legal effects of European
law be transferred to the PJCC instruments?
318
Introducing the primary principles of European law
318
The principle of consistent interpretation
320
Interpretation in conformity with framework decisions: the
Pupino case
320
Scope of the interpretative obligation (in criminal matters)
321
Broader implications
322
Direct effect
323
Supremacy
325
State liability
326
Judicial protection under national law: European law
requirements
327
Concluding remarks
328
Rapprochement of third pillar law with EC law
328
Domestic legal effects of
EU
criminal law: limitations and
prospects
329
Domestic Legal Effects on
EU
Criminal Law: Variations on
Three Themes; A Comment on the Jolande Prinssen
Contribution
Sacha Prêchai
Introduction
The paradox of direct effect
Supremacy put in perspective
Fundamental rights
acquis
Creeping depillarisation
335
335
337
341
343
The Interface between European and National Procedural
Law: UN Sanctions and Judicial Review
Nikolaos Lavranos
The legal framework
349
UN Security Council Resolutions in the Community legal
order
349
ECJ jurisprudence on UN Security Council Resolutions
350
The interface between European and national procedural
law
353
Review of UN sanctions before the CFI/ECJ
353
Hierarchy of norms in the Community legal order
355
Invalidating EC Regulation
357
2.2
Review
of UN
sanctions
before the ECrtHR
358
2.3
The consequences for the national courts
361
3
Conclusions
364
chapter
xii
The International Community, the European Union and
Its Member States; A Comment on the Nikolaos Lavranos
Contribution
fames Kingston
1
Introduction
369
2
The emerging structure of public international law
369
3
The interface between the United Nations Charter and
regional and domestic legal systems
372
3.1
European Union law
372
3.2
European Convention on Human Rights
377
3.3
Domestic legal systems
380
4
Action at UN Level
381
5
Conclusions
383
Index
386 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)138828377 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022617868 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJE969 |
| callnumber-raw | KJE969 |
| callnumber-search | KJE969 |
| callnumber-sort | KJE 3969 |
| classification_rvk | PS 2420 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)156875440 (DE-599)BVBBV022617868 |
| dewey-full | 341.242 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.242 |
| dewey-search | 341.242 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.242 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022617868</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150619</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070821s2007 ne |||| 10||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2007438599</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789076871721</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-76871-72-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9076871728</subfield><subfield code="9">90-76871-72-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)156875440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022617868</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ne</subfield><subfield code="c">NL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.242</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2420</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139712:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interface between EU law and national law</subfield><subfield code="b">proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by D. Obradovic ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Groningen</subfield><subfield code="b">Europa Law Publ.</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XX, 389 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Hogendorp papers</subfield><subfield code="v">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">European Union</subfield><subfield code="z">Netherlands</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International and municipal law</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Subsidiarity</subfield><subfield code="v">Congresses</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungskompetenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135117-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebungskompetenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071795-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Umsetzung</subfield><subfield code="g">Beamtenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4204162-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="y">2006</subfield><subfield code="z">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebungskompetenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4071795-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungskompetenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135117-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Umsetzung</subfield><subfield code="g">Beamtenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4204162-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Obradovic, Daniela</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)138828377</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Hogendorp papers</subfield><subfield code="v">7</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV017662718</subfield><subfield code="9">7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Augsburg</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015823976&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015823976</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2006 Amsterdam gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift 2006 Amsterdam |
| geographic | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Niederlande |
| geographic_facet | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Niederlande |
| id | DE-604.BV022617868 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T18:18:58Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T11:18:45Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789076871721 9076871728 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2007438599 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015823976 |
| oclc_num | 156875440 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-12 DE-703 DE-384 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-12 DE-703 DE-384 DE-188 |
| physical | XX, 389 S. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Europa Law Publ. |
| record_format | marc |
| series | The Hogendorp papers |
| series2 | The Hogendorp papers |
| spelling | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies ed. by D. Obradovic ... Groningen Europa Law Publ. 2007 XX, 389 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The Hogendorp papers 7 Europäische Union European Union Netherlands Congresses Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Recht Law European Union countries Congresses International and municipal law European Union countries Congresses Subsidiarity Congresses Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd rswk-swf Verwaltungskompetenz (DE-588)4135117-4 gnd rswk-swf Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 gnd rswk-swf Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd rswk-swf Umsetzung Beamtenrecht (DE-588)4204162-4 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Niederlande (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2006 Amsterdam gnd-content Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 s Verwaltungskompetenz (DE-588)4135117-4 s Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 s Umsetzung Beamtenrecht (DE-588)4204162-4 s Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 s DE-604 Obradovic, Daniela Sonstige (DE-588)138828377 oth The Hogendorp papers 7 (DE-604)BV017662718 7 Digitalisierung UB Augsburg application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015823976&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies The Hogendorp papers Europäische Union European Union Netherlands Congresses Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Recht Law European Union countries Congresses International and municipal law European Union countries Congresses Subsidiarity Congresses Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Verwaltungskompetenz (DE-588)4135117-4 gnd Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 gnd Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd Umsetzung Beamtenrecht (DE-588)4204162-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4048737-4 (DE-588)4135117-4 (DE-588)4071795-1 (DE-588)4170174-4 (DE-588)4204162-4 (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies |
| title_auth | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies |
| title_exact_search | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies |
| title_full | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies ed. by D. Obradovic ... |
| title_fullStr | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies ed. by D. Obradovic ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | Interface between EU law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies ed. by D. Obradovic ... |
| title_short | Interface between EU law and national law |
| title_sort | interface between eu law and national law proceedings of the annual colloquium of the g k van hogendorp centre for european constitutional studies |
| title_sub | proceedings of the annual colloquium of the G. K. van Hogendorp Centre for European Constitutional Studies |
| topic | Europäische Union European Union Netherlands Congresses Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Recht Law European Union countries Congresses International and municipal law European Union countries Congresses Subsidiarity Congresses Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Verwaltungskompetenz (DE-588)4135117-4 gnd Gesetzgebungskompetenz (DE-588)4071795-1 gnd Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd Umsetzung Beamtenrecht (DE-588)4204162-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union European Union Netherlands Congresses Recht Law European Union countries Congresses International and municipal law European Union countries Congresses Subsidiarity Congresses Verwaltungskompetenz Gesetzgebungskompetenz Mitgliedsstaaten Umsetzung Beamtenrecht Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Niederlande Konferenzschrift 2006 Amsterdam |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015823976&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV017662718 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT obradovicdaniela interfacebetweeneulawandnationallawproceedingsoftheannualcolloquiumofthegkvanhogendorpcentreforeuropeanconstitutionalstudies |