An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Hart
2007
|
| Ausgabe: | 9. ed. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | LVII, 539 S. |
| ISBN: | 9781841137544 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022615156 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20120824 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 070820s2007 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781841137544 |9 978-1-84113-754-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)255747732 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022615156 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-703 |a DE-29 |a DE-384 |a DE-19 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 |a DE-739 |a DE-91 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJE6456 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 343.240721 | |
| 084 | |a PS 3360 |0 (DE-625)139766: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a JUR 395f |2 stub | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Korah, Valentine |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132368080 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice |c Valentine Korah |
| 250 | |a 9. ed. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Hart |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a LVII, 539 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Gemeinschaften |0 (DE-588)35439-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Antitrust law |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Competition, Unfair |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Restraint of trade |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht |0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht |0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Europäische Gemeinschaften |0 (DE-588)35439-9 |D b |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht |0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015821303&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015821303 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804136772609769472 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Contents
Foreword to the Fourth Edition v
Foreword to the Seventh Edition vii
Preface ix
Table of Cases xxvii
Table of Legislation li
1 Introduction 1
1.1 The Common Market 2
1.2 The competition rules 3
1.2.1 Article 81—collusion that restricts competition 4
1.2.2 Article 82—the abuse of a dominant position 5
1.2.3 Regulation 4064/89—the control of concentrations 7
1.2.4 Interpretation of the competition rules and the
integration of the Common Market 8
1.2.5 The treaty covers all sectors of the economy 9
1.3 Economics of market power 10
1.3.1 Welfare economics—efficiency 11
1.3.2 Other reasons for controlling market power 13
1.3.2.1 Market integration 13
1.3.2.2 Fair competition 14
1.3.2.3 Small and medium sized firms 14
1.3.2.4 Political freedom 15
1.3.2.5 Workable competition 15
1.3.2.6 Cultural, environmental and social policy 15
1.3.2.7 Objectives of national law 16
1.3.2.8 Conflict of goals 16
1.3.3 Barriers to entry and substitutes may define the relevant
market 19
1.3.3.1 Substitutes on the demand side 19
1.3.3.2 Barriers to entry 20
1.3.3.2.1 Minimum efficient scale 21
1.3.3.2.2 Contestable markets 22
1.3.3.2.3 Network markets 22
1.3.3.2.4 Two sided markets 23
1.3.3.2.5 Government regulation 23
1.3.3.2.6 Intellectual property rights (iprs) 24
1.3.3.2.6.1 Free riders 24
1.4 Institutions of the EC 26
xiv CONTENTS
1.4.1 The Council 26
1.4.2 The Commission—the executive of the Communities 26
1.4.3 Community courts 27
1.4.3.1 Membership of EC courts 28
1.4.3.2 The jurisdiction of CFIandECJ 30
1.5 Enforcement of the competition rules 32
1.5.1 Regulation 1/2003 32
1.5.2 Enforcement by national courts 33
1.5.3 Enforcement by national authorities 34
1.5.4 Enforcement by the Commission 34
1.6 Extraterritorial competence 35
1.6.1 Free Trade Agreements 36
1.6.2 European Economic Area 37
1.7 The importance of the competition rules 37
1.8 Plan for the book 40
1.9 Bibliography 41
2 Analysis of Article 81(1) 43
2.1 Introduction 44
2.2 Collusion between undertakings 45
2.2.1 Undertakings 45
2.2.1.1 Entities 46
2.2.1.2 Economic activities 47
2.2.1.2.1 Social security 48
2.2.1.2.2 Buying is not an economic activity 49
2.2.1.2.3 Other criteria 49
2.2.2 Agreements 51
2.2.2.1 Unsigned agreements that are acted on 51
2.2.2.2 Unilateral conduct in the context of a long term
contract with selected distributors 52
2.2.2.3 Tenuous evidence on which collusion is sometimes
found 56
2.2.3 Decisions by associations of undertakings 57
2.2.4 Concerted practices 58
2.2.4.1 Economic considerations 58
2.2.4.2 Legal precedents 61
2.2.4.3 Agreements to exchange information 65
2.3 Which may affect trade between Member States 66
2.3.1 Market integration 66
2.3.2 Condition often fulfilled even if agreement is confined to a
single Member State 69
2.3.3 The condition has been further narrowed 72
CONTENTS xv
2.3.4 Commission s notice on effect on trade 72
2.3.5 The comparable provision in Article 82 is similarly
construed 72
2.3.6 The EEA 73
2.4 Have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or
distortion of competition within the Common Market 73
2.4.1 Consten and Grundig 75
2.4.2 Restrictions by object 76
2.4.3 Restriction by effect—Technique Miniere 77
2.4.4 Legal and economic context—Delimitis 78
2.4.4.1 Market definition 79
2.4.4.2 Counterfactual—Technique Miniere 80
2.4.4.2.1 Ancillary restraints 80
2.4.4.3 The principle in Wouters 83
2.4.4.4 Workable competition 84
2.4.4.5 National public interest 85
2.4.4.6 Are all these exceptions to Article 81(1) part
of the same principle? 86
2.4.4.7 The Commission s view 86
2.4.5 De facto restrictions 88
2.4.6 Appreciable effects 88
2.5 Nullity 91
2.6 Bibliography 91
3 Analysis of Article 81(3) 93
3.1 Article 81(3) 93
3.1.1 Individual exceptions 95
3.1.1.1 Right of complainant to appeal against a
clearance 96
3.1.2 Group exemptions 97
3.1.2.1 Withdrawal of group exemptions 98
3.1.2.2 No exemption from Article 82 98
3.1.2.3 Advantages and disadvantages of
group exemptions 99
3.1.2.4 Effect of group exemption on national
competition law 100
3.2 Bibliography 100
4 Dominant Position 101
4.1 Introduction 101
xvi CONTENTS
4.2 Objections to economic strength 102
4.2.1 Power over price 102
4.2.2 Ordo liberal influence 103
4.2.3 Discussion paper (dp) 104
4.3 Undertakings in a dominant position 105
4.3.1 Market definition 106
4.3.1.1 Relevant product market 107
4.3.1.2 Relevant geographic market 111
4.3.1.3 Previous definitions not binding 114
4.3.1.4 Time scale 114
4.3.1.5 Wider markets suggested by the ECJ 115
4.3.1.6 The fallacy of defining markets to assess
market power 115
4.3.2 Exclusive rights granted by government 116
4.3.3 Customer dependence 117
4.3.4 Appraisal of dominant position 119
4.3.4.1 Factors found relevant by the Commission
and courts 119
4.3.4.1.1 Entry barriers 119
4.3.4.1.2 Market shares 121
4.3.4.3 Conduct 123
4.3.5 Collective dominance 124
4.3.6 Substantial part of the Common Market 127
4.3.7 Abuse in linked market 128
4.3.8 Special responsibility of dominant firms not to abuse 129
4.3.9 Super dominant position 130
4.3.10 Conclusion I30
4.4 Bibliography 132
5 Abusive Exploitation 133
5.1 Introduction 134
5.1.1 Exclusionary abuses 13
5.1.2 Commission s staff discussion paper 142
5.2 Reduction of competition prohibited by Article 82—Continental
Can 144
5.2.1 Control of mergers 146
5.2.2 Discrimination—Ramsey pricing 14°
5.2.2.1 Single branding to exclude competitors of the
dominant firm 148
5.2.2.1.1 Suiker Unie I49
5.2.2.1.2 Hoffmann La Roche v Commission
{HLR) and Michelin I I49
CONTENTS xvii
5.2.2.1.3 Van den Bergh 151
5.2.2.1.4 Michelinll 154
5.2.2.1.5 British Airways 156
5.2.2.1.6 Retrospective rebates over long
period, etc 158
5.2.2.2 Discrimination against customers of
competitors downstream—Irish Sugar 158
5.2.2.3 Discrimination by firms enjoying special or
exclusive rights 159
5.2.2.4 Justifications 160
5.2.2.5 Conclusion on exclusionary rebates 162
5.2.3 Tying 163
5.2.3.1 Benefits and detriments of tying 165
5.2.3.1.1 Compatible consumables 165
5.2.3.1.2 Measuring usage 166
5.2.3.1.3 Full range of products 166
5.2.3.1.4 Economies of scope and
complementary products 166
5.2.3.1.5 Avoiding regulation 167
5.2.3.1.6 Excluding smaller firms 167
5.2.3.2 Cases 167
5.2.3.2.1 Hilti 167
5.2.3.2.2 Telemarketing 167
5.2.3.2.3 TetraPakll 168
5.2.3.2.4 Microsoft tying media player to
windows for PCs 169
5.2.3.3 Conclusion 171
5.2.4 Refusals to deal 172
5.2.4.1 Commercial Solvents 172
5.2.4.2 ABG 173
5.2.4.3 United Brands 174
5.2.4.4 Hugin 175
5.2.4.5 Sea and airports 175
5.2.5 Obligation to licence 175
5.2.5.1 Volvo 176
5.2.5.2 Magill 176
5.2.5.3 Tierce Ladbroke 178
5.2.5.4 Oscar Bronner 179
5.2.5.5 Other recent cases 180
5.2.5.5.1 Preliminary ruling in IMS 180
5.2.5.5.2 Syfait 182
5.2.5.5.3 Microsoft 185
5.2.5.5.3.1 Interoperability 186
5.2.5.5.3.2 Remedies 187
xviii CONTENTS
5.2.5.5.3.3 Standards 188
5.2.5.5.3.4 Comments 188
5.2.6 Predatory pricing 189
5.2.6.1 AKZO 192
5.2.6.2 Tetra Pak II 194
5.2.6.2.1 Recoupment 194
5.2.6.3 CEWAL—Compagnie Maritime Beige 195
5.2.6.4 Deutsche Post, Wanadoo and Deutsche Telecom 197
5.2.7 Other exclusionary conduct 198
5.2.7.1 Raising rivals costs 198
5.2.7.2 Vexatious litigation 199
5.2.7.3 Price squeeze 200
5.2.7.4 Acquiring the only competing technology 200
5.3 Unfair competition 200
5.3.1 Unfair prices 200
5.3.2 Other unfair terms 203
5.3.3 Ad hoc discriminatory pricing 204
5.3.4 Refusal to deal 206
5.3.4.1 Refusals to deal based on nationality 206
5.4 Integration of the Common Market 207
5.5 That may affect trade between Member States 209
5.6 Conclusion 209
5.7 Bibliography 212
6 State Measures to Protect Firms from Competition 217
6.1 Introduction 218
6.1.1 Government encouragement or persuasion is no
defence to Article 81 219
6.1.2 State measures reinforcing the effects of
anti competitive agreements ZI7
6.1.3 State measures that delegate the fixing of prices to
citizens 220
6.1.4 Anti competitive state measures making agreements
between undertakings unnecessary 221
6.1.5 State measures are subject to the rules for free
movement of goods 224
6.1.6 Conclusion on Article 10 224
6.2 Special and exclusive rights (Article 86) 225
6.2.1 Undertakings 226
6.2.1.1 Criterion functional—economic activity 226
6.2.1.2 Social solidarity 226
6.2.1.3 Supplying goods or services on the market 228
CONTENTS xix
6.2.1.4 Regulation 228
6.2.2 Unable to avoid infringing 229
6.2.3 Mere exercise of exclusive right infringes 229
6.2.4 Extension of market power to another activity 231
6.2.5 Derogation under Article 86(2) 231
6.3 Undertakings infringe only by autonomous conduct 232
6.4 Where national law requires an infringement, a national court
or competition authority should disapply the law—Consorzio
Fiammiferi 233
6.5 State monopolies of a commercial character (Article 31) 235
6.6 State aids (Articles 87 89) 236
6.7 Anti dumping duties 237
6.8 Conflict between competition rules and other Community
policies 238
6.8.1 Free movement and intellectual property 238
6.8.2 Social policy and competition 238
6.8.3 The environment and competition 239
6.8.4 Other Community policies and competition 240
6.9 Conclusion 240
6.10 Bibliography 240
7 Enforcement after Regulation 1/2003 241
7.1 Introduction 241
7.2 Articles 81 and 82 are directly applicable in national courts
and authorities 243
7.3 Community powers of NCAs, Commission and national courts 245
7.3.1 National powers of NCAs and courts—Article 3 245
7.3.2 Community law powers of NCAs and Commission—
Articles 5 and 7 10 246
7.3.3 Co operation between competition authorities—
Articles 12 14 249
7.3.4 Powers of national courts 251
7.3.4.1 Nullity 255
7.3.4.2 Effect of comfort letters 256
7.3.4.3 Assistance from the Commission 257
7.3.4.4 Forum shopping 258
7.4 The Commission s powers to obtain information 258
7.4.1 Requests for information (Art 18 and recital 23) 259
7.4.2 Inspections (Arts 19 21) 261
7.4.3 Sector enquiries (Art 17) 265
7.4.4 Confidentiality (Arts 12 and 28) 265
7.5 The Commission s Procedure (Art 27) 268
xx CONTENTS
7.5.1 Rights of the defence 269
7.5.2 Statement of objections and hearing 271
7.5.3 Access to the file 273
7.5.4 Subsequent steps 275
7.5.5 Appeals 275
7.6 Fines and penalties (Arts 23 26) 277
7.6.1 Notice on the method of setting fines 278
7.6.2 Notice on the reduction of cartel fines 279
7.6.3 Limitation periods 281
7.7 Conclusion 282
7.8 Bibliography 283
8 Classes of Agreement Clearly Prohibited 287
8.1 Distinctions between hard core and ancillary restrictions of
competition and between horizontal and vertical agreements 287
8.1.1 Hard core restraints illegal per se 288
8.1.2 Ancillary restraints may be justified 288
8.1.3 Horizontal and vertical relationships 290
8.2 Hard core horizontal cartels affecting price and allocating
markets or customers 294
8.2.1 Indirect influences on pricing policies 296
8.2.2 Information agreements 297
8.2.3 Joint sales organisations 298
8.2.4 Agreements about standard conditions of sale 300
8.2.5 Market allocation 30°
8.2.6 Maximum buying prices 301
8.3 Collective discrimination—boycotts and reciprocal exclusive
dealing 301
8.4 Collective aggregated discounts 303
8.5 Agreements to tie the sale of one item to another 304
8.6 Export bans 305
8.6.1 Export deterrents 306
8.6.2 Export boosters 309
8.7 Conclusion 310
8.8 Bibliography 310
9 Distribution Agreements 311
9.1 Historical introduction 311
9.9.1 Exclusive distribution (I will sell only to you within a
territory) exempted, not cleared 311
CONTENTS xxi
9.1.2 Dealers tied to brand owners (single branding) 312
9.2 Former group exemptions for exclusive distribution and
exclusive purchasing agreements 314
9.3 Clearance of exclusive distribution agreements 314
9.4 Selective distribution—non price competition 315
9.5 Retail format franchising 318
9.5.1 The ECJ s judgment in Pronuptia 319
9.6 Group exemption for vertical agreements 320
9.6.1 The exemption (Art 2) 322
9.6.1.1 Vertical agreements 322
9.6.1.2 Two or more parties 323
9.6.1.3 Agreement between actual or
potential competitors 323
9.6.1.4 Subject to conditions 324
9.6.1.5 Other group exemptions 324
9.6.1.6 Intellectual property rights 325
9.6.2 No white list 325
9.6.3 30% ceiling of market share—(Art 3) 325
9.6.4 Hard core restraints (Art 4) 326
9.6.4.1 Resale price maintenance (Art 4(a)) 327
9.6.4.2 Territorial restraints (Art 4(b)) 327
9.6.4.3 Selective distribution (Art 4(c)) 329
9.6.4.4 Cross supplies (Art 4(d) 329
9.6.5 Single branding (Art 5) 329
9.6.6 Withdrawal of exemption (Arts 6 8) 330
9.6.7 Transitional provisions (Art 12) 331
9.7 Ways of bringing goods and services to market 331
9.7.1 Agency 332
9.7.2 Collective exclusive distribution 333
9.8 Conclusion 333
9.9 Bibliography 333
10 Intellectual Property Rights and the Free Movement of Goods 335
10.1 Intellectual property rights and competition 335
10.2 Birth of the distinction between the existence of rights and
their exercise 337
10.3 Free movement of goods 337
10.4 Exhaustion of intellectual property rights when a product has
been sold by or with the consent of the holder in another
Member State 338
10.4.1 Early cases on exhaustion 338
xxii CONTENTS
10.4.2 Copyright—the ECJ emphasises the need for rewards
and incentives 343
10.4.3 Law of unfair competition 346
10.4.4 Rights in reputation—trademarks 347
10.4.4.1 Repackaging and relabelling of trade marked
goods 348
10.4.5 Merck v Stephar remains the law 350
10.4.5.1 Can pharmaceutical patents be used to
restrain parallel trade? GlaxoSmithKline 351
10.4.6 Sales outside the EEA do not exhaust intellectual
property rights 352
10.4.6.1 Exhaustion applies to goods sold anywhere
in the EEA 353
10.5 Harmonisation of intellectual property rights 353
10.5.1 Copyright 354
10.5.2 Trademarks 355
10.5.3 Patents 355
10.5.3.1 Supplementary protection certificates 355
10.6 No international exhaustion of trade marks 356
10.7 Conclusion 359
10.8 Bibliography 360
11 Licences of Industrial and Commercial Property Rights 363
11.1 Introduction: rationale for the grant of patent protection 364
11.2 The Commission s view of exclusive licences 365
11.3 The Court s view of exclusive licences: Nungesser, Coditel II,
Louis Erauw Jacquerie 367
11.4 The former group exemptions for patent, know how and mixed
licences 371
11.5 The group exemption for technology transfer—
Regulation 772/04 371
11.5.1 The exemption—Article 2 372
11.5.2 Ceilings of market share—Article 3 373
11.5.2.1 Competing undertakings —Article l(l)(j) 374
11.5.3 Hard core restraints—Article 4(1) and (2) 375
11.5.3.1 As between competing undertakings—
Article 491 and Guidelines 77 95 376
11.5.3.1.1 Price fixing 376
11.5.3.1.2 Output limitation 376
11.5.3.1.3 Market allocation 376
11.5.3.1.4 Restriction on using others
technology 376
CONTENTS xxiii
11.5.3.2 As between non competing undertakings 376
11.5.3.2.1 Price restrictions 377
11.5.3.2.2 Restrictions on passive sales 377
11.5.4 Provisions that are not exempt 379
11.5.5 Miscellaneous provisions 380
11.5.6 Conclusion on the regulation 381
11.6 Other guidelines 381
11.7 Licences of other kinds of commercial and industrial property
rights 383
11.8 The subcontracting notice 384
11.9 Collective licensing 385
11.10 Bibliography 386
12 Concentrations 389
12.1 Control under Article 81 and 82 389
12.2 The successive merger regulations 390
12.2.1 Mergers and acquisitions of sole control 391
12.2.2 Concentrative joint ventures 392
12.2.3 Thresholds 395
12.2.4 Notification 396
12.2.4.1 Referral to and from NCAs 397
12.2.5 Procedure 397
12.2.5.1 The Commission s power to obtain information 399
12.2.5.2 Fines 399
12.2.5.3 Miscellaneous 400
12.2.6 One stop control 400
12.3 Criteria for appraisal by the Commission 402
12.3.1 Collective dominant position (Gs 39 60) 404
12.3.2 Unilateral effects 406
12.4 Burden of proof 407
12.4.1 Airtours 407
12.4.2 Tetra Laval and other cases 408
12.4.3 IMP ALA 410
12.5 Horizontal mergers 411
12.5.1 Market shares 412
12.5.2 Other factors 413
12.5.3 Efficiencies 415
12.5.4 Failing firm 416
12.6 Vertical mergers 417
12.6.1 Draft guidelines 417
12.7 Conglomerate mergers 419
12.7.1 Draft guidelines 419
xxiv CONTENTS
12.7.2 Commission v Tetra Laval 419
12.7.3 GEIHoneywell 420
12.8 Remedies 422
12.9 Conclusion 423
12.10 Bibliography 425
13 Joint Ventures and Specialisation Agreements 427
13.1 Introduction 427
13.2 Case law on cooperative joint ventures 429
13.2.1 Inherent effect: loss of potential competition 430
13.2.1.1 Ancillary restrictions 431
13.2.1.2 The need for each party to appropriate the
benefits of its investment 432
13.2.1.3 More realistic attitude to be taken to
potential competition 433
13.2.1.3.1 ODIN 435
13.2.1.3.2 European Night Services and later
cases 436
13.2.2 The group effect—spillover 437
13.2.2.1 Spillover under the merger regulation 438
13.2.3 Foreclosure 438
13.2.4 Networks of joint ventures 43
13.2.5 Joint sales organisations 439
13.3 Disadvantages to industry of the Commission s refusal to clear
joint ventures 441
13.4 Guidelines on joint ventures 441
13.5 The group exemption for cooperative R D 442
13.6 Problems with standards 443
13.7 Conclusion on joint ventures 444
13.8 Specialisation agreements 445
13.8.1 Effects of specialisation agreements on competition 446
13.8.2 Individual decisions 446
13.8.3 Group exemption—Regulation 2658/2000 448
13.9 Bibliography 449
14 Conclusion 451
14.1 Criticisms 452
14.1.1 The paucity of economic analysis in the Commission s
and Courts public decisions 452
CONTENTS xxv
14.1.2 The Commission s view that Article 81(1) prohibits any
restriction of conduct that is significant on the market 454
14.1.2.1 The Court s analysis has been more helpful
than that of the Commission 457
14.1.3 The need to analyse ex ante: at the time the
commitments are made—the counterfactual 458
14.1.4 Hostile attitude to export bans and deterrents 459
14.1.5 Article 82 is intended to protect consumers not
particular competitors 461
14.1.5.1 Duty to supply narrowed 462
14.1.5.2 Predation illegal only if recoupment 462
14.1.5.3 Discrimination forbidden very widely: is the
prohibition limited to Article 82 in
combination with Article 86? 463
14.1.5.4 Rebates after Michelin IIand British Air 464
14.1.5.5 Joint dominant position 464
14.2 Steps taken by the Commission to meet the criticisms 465
14.2.1 New group exemptions since 1999 465
14.2.2 Regulation 1/2003 466
14.2.3 Appointment of the Commission s Chief Economist—
peer review and reorganisation of the Directorate General
for Competition 468
14.2.4 Review of the Application of Article 82 469
14.2.5 Cartels and the Leniency Programme 472
14.2.6 Pressures caused by competition cases on the ECJ and
CFI 473
14.3 Conclusion 474
Main Bibliography 475
Glossary 481
Appendix I: Excerpts from the EC Treaty 493
Appendix II: Regulation 1/2003 497
Appendix III: Useful websites 529
Index 531
Table of Cases
I. THE EC COMMISSION AND COURTS
ABB—see Pre insulated Pipe Cartel.
ABG—Aardolie Belangen Gemeenschap BVv Esso NederlandBV
(77/327/EEC), 19 April 1977, OJ 1977, LI 17/1, [1977] 2 CMLR Dl, CMR
9944; appeal sub nom BP v Commission (11111), 29 June 1978, [1978] ECR
1513, [1978] 3 CMLR 174, CMR 8465 4.3.3,4.3.6, 5.2.4.2
ACF Chemiefarma NV v Commission (41/69), 15 July 1970, [1970] ECR 661,
CMR 8083, appeal from Quinine Cartel 2.2.2, 8.2, 8.2.5
Adalat (96/478/EEC), 10 January 1996, OJ 1996 L201/1, [1996] 5 CMLR 416,
[1996] CEC 2,421; appeal sub nom Bayer v Commission (T 41/96), 26
October 2000, [2000] ECR 11 3383, [2001] 4 CMLR 4 (CFI); Bundesverband
der Arzneimittel Importeure eVand Commission v Bayer (C 2 3/01 P), 6
January 2004, OJ 2004, C 59/2, [2004] 4 CMLR 653, [2004] All ER (EC)
500 (ECJ) 2.2.2.2,5.2.2.4, 8.6.1,10.7
AEG—Allgemeine Elektricitats Gesellschaft AEG Telefunken AG v
Commission (107/82), 25 October 1983, [1983] ECR 3151, [1984] 3 CMLR
325, CMR
14018 2.2.2.2, 9.4,11.1
Aeroports de Paris v Commission (T 128/98), 12 December 2000, [2001] 4
CMLR 1376, [2000] ECR 11 3929; appeal dismissed C 82/01 P, 24 October
2002, [2002] ECR 1 9297; [2003] 4 CMLR 609 6.2.1.4
Ahmed Saeed Flugreisen and Silver Line Reisebiiro GmbH v Zentrale zur
Bekampfung Unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV(66/86), 11 April 1989, [1989] ECR
803, [1990] 4 CMLR 102, [1989] 2 CEC 654 4.3.1.1, 4.3.1.5, 5.1.1, 7.2, 12.2.6
Air tours/First Choice (2000/276/EC, IV/M 1524), 22 September 1999, OJ 2000,
L93/1, [2000] 5 CMLR 494, [2000] CEC 2,203; appeal T 342/99, [2002]
ECR H 2585, [2002] 5 CMLR 317. Successor to Airtours claims damages
from Commission: My Travel v Commission (T 212/03), OJ 2003 C200/28.
CFI ruled that My Travel is entitled to some damages, but the exact
amount is still being determined 1.4.3.2, 2.2.2.3, 2.2.4.1,4.3.5, 7.5, 12.2.5,
12.3.1,12.3.2,12.4.1,12.4.3,12.9,14.1.1
AKZO—Engineering and Chemical Supplies (Epsom and Gloucester) Ltd v
AKZO Chemie UK Ltd (83/462/EEC), 29 July 1983, OJ 1983, L252/13,
[1983] 3 CMLR 694 (interim relief); final decision, 14 December 1985, OJ
1985, L374/1, [1986] 3 CMLR 273, CMR 10748; on appeal AKZO Chemie
BV v Commission (62/86), 3 July 1991, [1991] ECR 1 3359, [1993] 5 CMLR
215, [1993] 2 CEC 115 4.3.5, 5.1.1, 5.2.2.1.4,5.2.2.4,5.2.6.1,5.2.6.4,5.3.3
AKZO Chemie BV and AKZO Chemie UK Ltd v Commission (53/85),
judgment concerning confidentiality of documents, 24 June 1986, [1986]
ECR 1965, [1987] 3 CMLR 231, CMR 14318 1.5.3, 7.4.4
Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Another v Commission (T 125 253/03 R), 30
October 2003, OJ 2004, C35/10, [2003] ECR 11 4771, [2004] 4 CMLR 744... 7.4.4
xxviii TABLE OF CASES
Albany—Albany International BV v Stichting, Bedrijfspensioenfonds
Textielindustrie and Others (C 67/96, C l 15,116,117 and 219/97), 21
September 1999, [1999] ECR1 5751, [2000] 4 CMLR 446 1.2.5,1.3.2.6,
2.2.1.2.3,2.4.4.5, 6.2.5, 6.8,6.8.2
AlcatellTelettra (91/252/EEC, IV/M.042), 12 April 1991, OJ 1991, L122/48,
[1991] 4 CMLR 778, [1991] 1 CEC 2,112, Merger Reporter B 18, p 113 ... 4.3.1Q
Almelo (C 393/92), 13 April 1994, [1994] ECR 1 1477, [1994] 2 CEC 281 4.3.5
Alsatel v Novasam (247/86), 5 October 1988, [1988] ECR 5987, [1990] 4 CMLR
434, [1990] 1 CEC 248 4.3.1.5
Altmark Trans Gmbh, C 280/00, 24 July 2003, [2003] ECR 1 7747 6.6
AM S Europe Ltd v Commission (155/79), 4 February 1981, [1982] ECR
1575, [1982] 2 CMLR 264, CMR 8757 7.4.4
Anic Partecipazioni, Commission v (C 49/92 P), [1999] ECR 1 4125, [2001] 4
CMLR 602 2.2.2.1
Anseau—Association Nationale des Services d Eau (Anseau Navewa)
(82/371/EEC), 17 December 1981, OJ 1982, L167/39, [1982] 2 CMLR 193,
CMR 10368; on appeal NVIAZ International Belgium and Others v
Commission (96 102, 104, 105, 108 110/82), 8 November 1983, [1983]
ECR 3369, [1984 3 CMLR 276, CMR 14023 2.2.1.2.3, 2.4
AOIP—Association des Ouvriers en Instruments de Precision v Beyrard
(76/29/EEC), 2 December 1975, OJ 1976, L6/8, [1976] 1 CMLR D14, CMR
9801 11.2
AOK and Others v Ichthyl Gesellsschaft Cordes and Others (C 264, 306, 354
355/01), 16 March 2004, [2004] ECR I 2493, [2004] 4 CMLR 22 ... 1.3.2.6, 5.3.2,
6.2.1.2,6.2.5
APB (90/33/EEC), 14 December 1989, OJ 1990, L18/35, [1990] 4 CMLR 176,
[1990] 1 CEC 2,060; subsequent action of Commission, Press Release
IP/00/16, 11 Jan 2000 8.3,14.1.2
Arduino v Compagnia Assicuratrice RAS Spa (C 35/99), 19 February 2002,
[2002] ECR 1 1529; [2002] 4 CMLR 866 6.1.4
Arge Bat, ZVEI and HDE (Art 19(3) notice), OJ 1998, C172/13, [1999] 4
CMLR 526 1.3.2.6
Arjoumari Priouxl Wiggins Teape Appleton Pic (IV/M.025), 10 December 1990,
OJ 1990, C321, [1991] 4 CMLR 854, Merger Reporter B4, p 23 2.2.1.1,12.2.1
Atlantic Container Line and Others (T 191 and 212 214/98), 30 Sept 2003,
[2003] ECR 11 3275; on appeal, OJ 2004, Cl 18/45 4.3.1.1,4.3.4.3. 4.3.5
An Ble Vert—see Leclerc
Austin RoverlUnipart Re the Agreement between Austin Rover Group Ltd. and
Unipart Group Ltd. (88/84/EEC), 22 December 1987, OJ 1988, L45/34,
[1988] 4 CMLR 513, CMR 10968 2.2.1.1
BA pic. V. Commission, 1 219/99, December 17, 2003, [2003] ECR II 5917,
[2014] 4 CMLR 1008, C 95/04P, opinion 23.02.06 5.2.2,5.2.2.L5,5.2.2.1.6,
5.2.2.4,5.2.3.4.4, 5.2.2.5.2, 5.2.7,5.3.2,5.3.3,14.1.5.4,14.2.4
B I/Sea Link—see Sea Link
Bagnasco (Carlo) and Others v Banca Popolare di Novara Soc Coop art, and v
Cassa diRisparmio digenova e Imperia SpA (C 215 216/96), 21 Jan 1999
[1999] ECR 1 135, [1999] 4 CMLR 624, [1999] CEC 601 2.3.2
TABLE OF CASES xxix
Banks (HJ) Co v British Coal Corporation (C 128/92), 13 April 1994, [1994]
ECR 1 1209, [1994] 5 CMLR 30 1.2.5
BASF v Commission (T 4/89), 17 December 1991, OJ 1992, C22/11, [1991]
ECR 11 1523; application for revision dismissed, 26 March 1992, [1992]
ECR 11 1591 2.2.2.3
BAT Cigaretten Fabriken GmbH v Commission (35/83), 30 January 1985, [1985]
ECR 363, [1985] CMLR 470, CMR 14166, appeal from ToltecslDorcet
(82/897/EEC), 15 December 1982, OJ 1982, L379/19, [1983] 1 CMLR 412,
CMR 10459, BAT and Reynolds v Commission (142 156/84), 17
November 1987, [1987] ECR 4487, [1988] 4 CMLR 24, CMR 14405, appeal
from Phillip Morris 12.1, 12.2.6
Bayer v Commission (T 41/96), 26 October 2000, [2000] ECR II 3383, [2001] 4
CMLR 126; appeal to ECJ sub nom Bundesverband der
Arzneimittel Importeure eV and Commission v Bayer (C 2 3/01 P); 6
January 2004, [2004] ECR 1 23, [2004] 4 CMLR 653. Appeal from
Adalat—see Adalat
Bayer/Gist Brocades—Re the Agreement between Bayer AG and GistBrocades
/VF(76/172/EEC), 15 December 1975, OJ 1976, L30/13, [1976] 1 CMLR
D98, CMR 9814 4.3.1.2
BBC Brown Boveri—Re the Agreements between BBC Brown Boveri and NGK
Insulators Lf /(88/54/EEC), 11 October 1988, OJ 1988, L301/68, [1989] 4
CMLR 610,[1989] 1 CEC 2,234 13.2.1.3
Becu and Others, Public Prosecutor v (C 22/98), 16 September 1999, [1999]
ECR 1 5665, [2001] 4 CMLR 968 2.2.1.2.3
Beecham v Europharm of Worthing Ltd (C 267 268/95) —see Merck Co
Inc v Primecrown 10.4.1, 10.4.5
Beguelin Import Co v GL Import Export SA (22/71), 25 November 1971, [1971]
ECR 949, [1972] CMLR 81, CMR 8149 10.4.3
Belasco (Societe Cooperative des Asphalteurs Beiges) v Commission (246/86),
11 July 1989, [1989] ECR 2117, [1991] 4 CMLR 96, [1990] 2 CEC
912 2.2.3, 2.3.2
Belgian Travel Agents— Vereniging van Vlaamse Reisbureaus v Sociale Dienst
van de Plaatselijke en Gewestelijke Overheidsdiensten (311/85), 1 October
1987, [1987] ECR 3801, [1989] 4 CMLR 213, CMR 14499 6.1.2,6.1.4,9.7.1
Beguelin Import Co. v S.A.G.L. Import Export (22/71), 25 November 1971,
[1971] ECR 949, [1972] CMLR 81 10.4.3
Benzine en Petroleum—see AEG.
Binon et Cie SA v SA Agence et Messageries de la Presse (243/83), 3 July 1985,
[1985] ECR 2015, [1985] 3 CMLR 800, CMR 14218 9.4
BMW Belgium SA v Commission (32 36 82/78), 12 July 1979, [1979] ECR
2435, [1980] 1 CMLR 370, CMR 8548 2.2.1.1,8.6.1
BNIC (Bureau National Interprofessionneldu Cognac) v Yves Aubert (136/86),
3 December 1987, [1987] ECR 4789, [1988] 4 CMLR 331,
[1989] 1 CEC 363 6.1.2, 6.1.4
BNIC (Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac) v Guy Clair (123/83), 30
January 1985, [1985] ECR 391, [1985] 2 CMLR 430, CMR 14160 2.2.3, 2.3.1,
6.1.1,6.1.4
xxx TABLE OF CASES
Bodson v Pompes Funebres des Regions Liberees SA (30/87), 4 May 1988,
[1988] ECR 2479, [1989] 4 CMLR 984, [1990] 1 CEC 3 2.2.1.2.3, 5.1.1, 5.3.1
Boeringer Ingelheim v Swingward (C 143/00), 23 April 2002, [2002] ECR
1 3762, [2002] 2 CMLR 623, [2002] CEC 378 10.4.4.1
Boosey Hawkes—BBIIBoosey Hawkes (interim measures) (87/5OO/EEC),
29 July 1987, OJ 1987, L286/36, [1988] 4 CMLR 67, CMR 10920 5.2.7.2
Bosch—see de Geus.
Boussoisllnterpane—Re the Agreement between Boussois SA and
Interpane Entwicklungs und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH Co KG
(87/123/EEC), 15 December 1986, OJ 1987, L5O/3O, [1988] 4 CMLR 124,
CMR 10859 I1 3
BPIKellogg—Re the Application of BP International Ltd and the MW Kellogg
Company (85/560/EEC), 2 December 1985, OJ 1985, L369/6, [1986] 2
CMLR 619, CMR 10747 13.2.1,13.2.1.3,14.1.2
BP Kemi—Atka AIS v BP Kemi AIS and AIS de Danske Spritfabrikker
(79/934/EEC), 5 September 1979, OJ 1979, L286/32, [1979] 3 CMLR 684,
CMR 10165 2.2.2.1
BP v Commission—see ABG.
Brasserie de Haecht SA v Wilkin (23/67), 12 December 1967, [1967] ECR 407,
[1968] CMLR26, CMR 8053 5.2.2.1.3
Bristol Myers Squibb Ors v Paranova AIS (C 427,429 436/93),
11 July 1996, [1996] ECR 1 3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151,
[1996] 1 CEC 716 10.4.4.1,10.5.1
British Airways (2000/74/EC), 14 July 1999, OJ 2000, L30/1,
[2000] 4 CMLR 999, [2000] CEC 2,145; appeal (T 219/99), 17 Dec 2003,
[2004] 4 CMLR 1008; appeal to ECJ, C 95/04 P, OJ 2004, C106/22 4.3,5.2.2,
5.2.2.1.5,53.2,5.3.3
British Plasterboard—Iberian Trading UK Ltd v BPB Industries pic
(89/22/EEC), 5 December 1988, OJ 1989, L10/50, [1990] 4 CMLR 464,
[1989] 1 CEC 2,008; on appeal to CFI BPB Industries pic and British
Gypsum Limited v Commission (T 65/89), 1 April 1993, [1993] ECR 11 389,
[1993] 5 CMLR 32, [1993] 1 CEC 713;on appeal to ECJ (C 310/93 P),
6 April 1995, [1995] ECR 1 865, [1997] 4 CMLR 238,
[1995] 2 CEC 15 4.3.1.1, 5.1.1, 5.2.2.1.4
British Sugar and Others (1999/210/EC), OJ 1999, L 76/1, [1999] 4 CMLR
1316; on appeal to CFI Tate Lyle and Others v Commission (T 202/98,
T 204/98 and 207/98), 12 July 2001, [2001] ECR 11 2035; on appeal to ECJ
British Sugar and Others (C 359/01 P), 29 April 2004, OJ 2004, Cl 18/13,
[2004] 5 CMLR 329 1.7
Bronbemaling—Zuid Nederlandsche Bronbemaling en Grondboringen B V v
Heidemaatschappij Beheer AT(75/570/EEC), 25 July 1975, OJ 1975,
L249/27, [1975] 2 CMLR D67, CMR 9776 11.2
Oscar Bronner GmbH Co. KG v Mediaprint Seitungs und Zeitschriftenverlag
GmbHd Co. KG and others (C 7/97), 26 November 1998, [1998] ECR
1 7817, [1999] 4 CMLR 112, [1999] CEC 53 5.2.2.1.4, 5.2.5.4,5.2.6.3,
5.2.5.5.3,14.1.5.2
TABLE OF CASES xxxi
BRT v SABAM—Belgische Radio en Televisie (BRT) v Societe Beige des
Auteurs Compositeurs et Editeurs (SABAM) and NVFonior (127/73), 27
March 1974, [1974] ECR 51 and 313, [1974] 2 CMLR 238, CMR 8269 5.3.2,
7.2, 11.9
Bundesverbandder Arzneimittel Importeure eVand Commission v Bayer (C 2
3/01 p)_ see Adalat
Burroughs AG and Ets Delplanque and Burroughs AG and Geha Werke GmbH
(Re the Agreements between) (72/25/EEC and 72/26/EEC), 22 December
1971, JO 1972, L13/47 and 50, [1972] CMLR D67 and D72, CMR 9485
and 9486 14.1.2
Cadillon v Hoss (1/71), 11 May 1971, [1971] ECR 351, [1971] CMLR 420,
CMR 8135 2.4.6
Campari—Re the Agreement of Davide Campari Milano SpA (78/253/EEC), 23
December 1977, OJ 1978, L70/69, [1978] 2 CMLR 397, CMR 10035 14.1.2
Carbon Graphite Cartel, Press Release IP/03/1651, COMP/38.359 PO
Electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products, [2004] 4 CMLR
257 7.6.1
Carlo Bagnasco and others v Banco Popolare di Novara soc. coop. — see
Bagnasco.
Cartonboard (94/601/EC), 13 July 1994, OJ 1994, L243/1, [1994] 5 CMLR 547,
[1994] 2 CEC 2,186; on appeal, 14 May 1998, Sarrio v Commission
(T 334/94), [1998] ECR 11 1439; SCA Holding v Commission (T 327/94),
[1998] ECR 11 1373, [1998] 5 CMLR 195; in ECJ, Sarrio SA v Commission
(C 291/98 P), 16 November 2000, [2000] ECR 1 9991, SCA Holding Ltd v
Commission (C 297/98 P), 16 November 2000, [2000] ECR 1 10101, [2001] 4
CMLR 413; Cascades (T 308/94), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR 11 813,
[2002] 4 CMLR 1381; Stora (T 354/94), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR
11 813, [2002] 4 CMLR 1397 2.2.4.2, 7.6.2
CECED (2000/475/EC), OJ 2000, L187/47, [2000] 5 CMLR 635, [2000]
CEC 2,279 1.3.2.6, 3.1,6.8.3
Cement Cartel (94/815/EC), 30 November 1994, OJ 1994, L343/1, [1995] 4
CMLR 327, [1995] 1 CEC 2,092; on appeal joined cases, Cimenteries and
Others v Commission (T 25/95 etc), 15 March 2000, [2000] ECR 11 491,
[2000] 5 CMLR 204, (C 399/93), 12 December 1995 7.5.2
Centra/arm BV v American Home Products Corp (3/78), 10 Oct 1978, [1978]
ECR 1823, [1979] 1 CMLR 326, CMR 8475 10.4.4.1
Centrafarm BVandde Peijper v Sterling Drug Inc (15/74), 31 Oct 1974, [1974]
ECR 1147, [1974] 2 CMLR 480, CMR 8246.... 6.8.1,10.4.1,10.4.2,10.4.4,10.7,
11.2,11.3
Centre Beige d Etudes—see Telemarketing.
CEWAL Ors (93/82/EEC), 23 December 1992, OJ 1993, L34/20, [1995] 5
CMLR 198, [1993] 1 CEC 2,144; on appeal, see Compagnie Maritime Beige
(T 24 26 28/93), 8 October 1996, [1996] ECR II1201, [1997] 4 CMLR
273 (CFI); (C 395/96 P), 16 March 2000, [2000] ECR 1 1365, [2000] 4
CMLR 1076 (ECJ) 2.2.3,4.3.4.1.2,4.3.4.3,4.3.5,4.3.9,5.2.5.5.3,5.2.6.3,
14.1.5,14.1.5.5
xxxii TABLE OF CASES
Chiquita—see United Brands.
CICCE v Commission (C 298/83), 28 March 1985, [1985] ECR 1105, [1986] 1
CMLR486, CMR 14157 5 3 2
Cimbel~Re La Cimenterie Beige SA (72/474/EEC), 22 December 1972, JO
1972, L303/24, [1973] CMLR D167, CMR 9544 2.3.1,8.6.2
Cimenteries Re Noordwijks Cement Accoord: Cimenteries CBR
Cementbedrijven NV v EEC Commission (8 11/66), 15 March 1967, [1967]
ECR 75, [1967] CMLR 77, CMR 8052 2.3.2
Clima ChappedBuderus (Re the Agreements of) (69/241/EEC), 22 July 1969,
JO 1969, L195/1, [1970] CMLR D7, CMR 9316 13.8.2,13.8.3
CNSD—Consiglio Nazionali degli Spedizionieri Doganali v Commission
(T 513/93), 30 March 2000, [2000] ECR II 1807, [2000] 5 CMLR 614;
appeal from Commission decision (93/438/EEC), 30 June 1993, OJ 1993,
L203/27, [1995] 5 CMLR 495; ECJ on preliminary ruling also considered
same matter, see Commission v Italy (Custom agents) (C 35/96), 18 June
1998, [1998] ECR 1 3851, [1998] 5 CMLR 889 2.2.1.2.3
COBELPA—Re the Vereeniging van Nederlandsche Papierfabrikanten ( VNP)
and the Association des Fabricants de Pates, Papiers et Cartons de Belgique
(77/592/EEC), 8 September 1977, OJ 1977, L242/10, [1977] 2 CMLR D28,
CMR 9980 2.2.4.3,8.2.2
Coberco—HG Oude Luttikhuis and Others v Verenigde Cooperatieve
Melkindustrie Coberco and Dijkstra—Hendrik Evert Dijkstra and Others v
Friesland (Frico Domo) Cooperatie BA and Others (C 319/93, 40 224/94),
12 December 1995, [1995] ECR 1 4471, [1996] 5 CMLR 178 8.2.6
Coca ColalAmalgamated Beverages (97/540/EC, M.794), 22 January 1997, OJ
1997, L218/15, [1997] CEC 2,226; confirmed in Coca Cola Company and
Coca Cola Enterprises Inc v Commission (T 125 127/97), 22 March 2000,
[2000] ECR II 1733, [2000] 5 CMLR 467 4.3.1.2,4.3.1.5. 7.3.2, 7.4
Coditel (SA Compagnie Generate pour la Diffusion de la Television) v Cine Vog
Films (62/79), 18 March 1980, [1980] ECR 881, [1981] 2 CMLR 362, CMR
8662 10.4.2
Coditel If—Coditel SA v Cine Vog Films SA (No 2) (262/81), 6 October 1982,
[1982] ECR 3381, [1983] 1 CMLR 49, CMR 8865 2.4.4.2.1, 5.2.3.1.2 8.6,
10.4.2,11.3,14.1.1
Commercial Solvents—Istituto Chemioterapico Italiano SpA and Commercial
Solvents Corp v Commission (6 7/73), 6 March 1974, [1974] ECR 223,
[1974] 1 CMLR 309, CMR 8209 2.2.1.1,2.3.1,2.3.5,4.3.7, 5.2.3.4.2,5.2.4,
5.2.4.1,5.2.5.5.2, 5.2.2.5.2
Commission v Italy (Custom agents) (C 35/96), 18 June 1998, [1998] ECR
1 3851, [1998] 5 CMLR 889 2.2.1.2.3, 6.1.4
Commission v Italy (Bananas) (184/85), 7 May 1987, [1987] ECR 2013 4.3.1.1
Commission v Netherlands (Direct effect of 86 (2)) (C 157 160/94), 23
October 1997, [1997] ECR 1 5699, [1998] 2 CMLR 373 6.5
Commission v United Kingdom (Compulsory patent licences) (C 30/90), 18
February 1992, [1992] ECR 1 829, [1992] 2 CMLR 709, [1992] 1 CEC 451.. 10.4.1
Commission and France v Ladbroke Racing (C359 and 379/95P), [1997] ECR
1 6265, [1998] 4 CMLR 27, [1998] CEC 474 6.3,6.4
TABLE OF CASES xxxiii
Compagnie Maritime Beige Transports SA v Commission (T 24, 26 28/93), 8
October 1996, [1996] ECR 11 1201, [1997] 4 CMLR 273, [1997] 1 CEC 74;
appeal from CEWAL; on appeal (C 395/96 P), 16 March 2000, [2000] ECR
1 1365, [2000] 4 CMLR 1076 2.2.3, 4.3.4.1.2, 4.3.5, 4.3.9, 5.1.1, 5.2.5.5.3,
5.2.5.4, 5.2.6.3
Confederation Espanola de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio v. Compagnia
de Petroleos, C 217/05, 14 December 2005 9.7.1
Consorzio Industries Fiammiferi v Autorita Garante della Concorrenza e del
Mercato (C 198/01), 9 September 2003, [2003] ECR 1 8055, [2003] 5 CMLR
829 6.1, 6.4, 7.2
Consten Grundig—Re the Agreement of Grundig Verkaufs GmbH
(64/566/EEC), 23 Sept 1964, JO 2545/64, [1964] CMLR 489; appeal
Etablissements Consten SA and Grundig Verkaufs GmbH v EEC
Commission (56 58/64), 13 July 1966, [1966] ECR 299, [1966] CMLR 418,
CMR 8046 1.2.4,2.3.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2,
2.4.3, 2.5, 3.1.1, 7.1, 8.5, 8.6, 8.6.1, 9.1.1,9.5.1,10.2,10.4.5.1,11.3, 14.1.2.1,14.1.4
Continental Can—Re Continental Can Company Inc and Europemballage Inc
(72/21/EEC), 9 December 1971, JO 1972, L7/25, [1972] CMLR Dl 1, CMR
9481; on appeal Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Co Inc v
Commission (6/72), 21 February 1973, [1973] ECR 215, [1973] CMLR 199,
CMR 8171 1.2.2,1.2.3,1.2.4,1.4.3.2, 4.3.1,4.3.1.1, 4.3.7, 4.3.10, 5.1, 5.2,
5.2.1,5.2.2.1.1,5.2.7,12.1
Corbeau (C 320/91), 19 May 1993, [1993] ECR 1 2533, [1995] 4 CMLR 621,
[1995] 1 CEC 322 6.2.3
Courage Ltd v Bernard Crehan and Others (C 453/99), 20 September 2001,
[2001] ECR 1 6297, [2001] 5 CMLR 1058, [2001] CEC 2971.2, 1.5.2, 1.7, 7.2, 7.3.4
Cullet and Another v Centre Leclerc, Toulouse (SA Sodinord) (231/83), 29
January 1985, [1985] ECR 305, [1985] 2 CMLR 524, CMR 14139 6.1.4
Daimler Chrysler (2002/760/EC), 10 Oct 2001, OJ 2002, L257/1, [2003] CEC
2,003, [2003] 4 CMLR 95 2.2.1, 5.4, 7.6
Daimler Chrisler AG v. Commission T 325/01, [2005] ECR 11 3319 9.7.1
Dansk Supermarked AIS v Imerco A/S (58/80), 22 January 1981, [1981] ECR
181, [1981] 3 CMLR 590, CMR 8729 10.4.3
Davidoff (Zino) SA A G Imports Ltd (C 414/99) and Levi Strauss Co
and Another v Tesco (C 415/99), 20 November 2001, [2001] ECR 1 8691,
[2002] 1 CMLR 1, [2002] CEC 154 10.6
Davidson Rubber Company (Re the Agreement of) (72/237/EEC), 9 June 1972,
JO 1972, L143/31, [1972] CMLR D52, CMR 9512 2.4, 11.2,14.1.2
De Havi/and—Aerospatiale Alenia AeritalialDe Haviland (Re the
Concentration between) (91/619/EEC) (IV/M.053), 2 October 1991, OJ
1991, L334/42, [1992] 4 CMLR M2, [1992] 1 CEC 2,034, Merger Reporter
B48, p 401 12.3,12.9
De Laval/Stork VOF Joint Venture (Re) (77/543/EEC), 25 July 1977, OJ 1977,
L215/11, [1977] 2 CMLR D69, CMR 9972 12.2.1,13.2.5
Deere (John) John Deere Ltd v Commission (85/79/EEC), 14 December 1984,
OJ 1985, L35/58, [1985] 2 CMLR 554, CMR 10652; (C 7/95P), 28 May
1998, [1997] ECR 1 3111, [1998] 5 CMLR 311, [1998] CEC 611; appeal
from UK Tractors 7.4.4, 8.2.2
xxxiv TABLE OF CASES
Delimitis (Stergios) v Henninger Brdu (C 234/89), 28 February 1991, [1991]
ECR1 935, [1992] 5 CMLR 210, [1992] 2 CEC 530 2.4.4,2.4.6,5.2.2.1.3,
5.2.2.1.6,7.3.4.1,9.1.1,9.6.5, 14.1.2, 14.1.2.1, 14.2.1
Delta Chemie—Re the Agreement between DDD Ltd and Delta Chemie
(88/563/EEC), 13 October 1988, OJ 1988, L309/34, [1989] 4 CMLR 535,
CMR 95014 1412
Demo Studio Schmidt v Commission (210/81), 11 October 1983, [1983] ECR
3045, [1984] 1 CMLR 63, CMR 14009 9 4
Deutsche Post (2001/354/EEC) 20 March 2001, OJ 2001, L125/27, [2001] 5
CMLR 99 5.2.6.4
Deutsche Telekom (re access to local loop) (2003/707/EC, COMP/C 1/37.451,
37.578, 37.579), May 21 2003, OJ 2003, L263/9, [2004] 4 CMLR 790; on
appeal re confidential treatment, Deutsche Telekom v Commission
(T 271/03), OJ 2003, C264/29 5.2.6.4
Digital, XXVIIth Report on Competition Policy 1997, page 153 5.2.3
Direction General de Defensa de la Competencia—see Spanish Banks.
Distillers (Red Label), OJ 1983, C245/3, [1983] 3 CMLR 173 8.6.1
Distillers—The Distillers Company Lfc?(78/163/EEC), 20 December 1977, OJ
1978, L50/16, [1978] 1 CMLR 400, CMR 10011; on appeal The Distillers
Co Ltd v Commission (30/78), 10 July 1980, [1980] ECR 2229, [1980] 3
CMLR 121, CMR 8613 1.3.2.8,8.6.1
Dow Benelux NV v Commission ( 85/87), 17 October 1989, [1989] ECR 3137,
[1991] 4 CMLR 410 7.3.3
Dutch Nitrogenous Fertilisers—The Community v Centraal Stikstof
Verkoopkantoor BK(78/732/EEC), 20 July 1978, OJ 1978, L242/15, [1979] 1
CMLR 11, CMR 10076 8.2.3
Dyestuffs—EC Commission v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd and Others
(1V/26.267), 24 July 1969, OJ 1969, L195/11, [1969] CMLR D23; on appeal
ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd) and Others v Commission (48, 49,
51 53, 55 57/69), 14 July 1972, [1972] ECR 619, [1972] CMLR 557, CMR
8161, and Francolor v Commission (54/69), [1972] ECR 851, CMR 8165 . . 2.2.4.2,
5.2.2.4, 7.5.3, 8.2
EATE Levy—Algemene Schippersvereniging v Association Nationale des
Travailleurs Independants de la Bdtellerie (85/383/EEC), 10 July 1985, OJ
1985, L219/35, [1988] 4 CMLR 698, CMR 10713; confirmed ANTIB
(Association Nationale des Travailleurs Independants de la Bdtellerie) v
Commission (272/85), 20 May 1987, [1987] ECR 2201, [1988] 4 CMLR 677,
CMR 14458 8.6.2
Echimlles Distribution SA v Association de Dauphine and Others(C 9/99), 3
October 2000, [2000] ECR I 8207, [2003] 2 CMLR 506 6.1.4
EMI Electrola GmbH v Patricia Im und Export (341/87), 24 January 1989,
[1989] ECR 79, [1989] 2 CMLR 413, [1990] 1 CEC 322 .. .. 10.5.1
EMI Records Ltd v CBS United Kingdom Ltd and Others (51, 86 96/75), 15
June 1976, [1976] ECR 811 et seq, [1976] 2 CMLR 235, CMR 8350 52 .... 10.4.6
Enkhem v Commission (C 251/99) and others, 15 Oct 2002,, reported under
the name of Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappifj v Commission (C 238/99 P),
[2002] ECR 1 8375, [2003] 4 CMLR 397, appeal from PVCII 2.2.1.1, 7.3.3,
7.4.1,7.5,7.5.2,8.2
TABLE OF CASES xxxv
EnsolStora (M. 1225), 25 November 1998, OJ 1999 L254/9, [2000] 4 CMLR
372 (summary only). Comment: nera Competition Brief 9: Buyer Power and
the EnsolStora Decision at www.nera.com 12.5.2
EPI Code of Conduct (1999/267/EC), 23 April 1999, OJ 1999, L106/14, [1999]
5 CMLR 540, largely confirmed Institut des Mandataires Agree v
Commission (T 144/99), 28 March 2001, [2001] ECR 11 1087, [2001] 5
CMLR 77 2.2.1.2.3, 2.2.3
Erauw Jacquery (Louis) SPRL v La Hesbignonne SC (27/87), 19 April 1988, ¦
[1988] ECR 1919, [1988] 4 CMLR 576, [1989] 2 CEC 637 8.6,11.3,14.1.1
Eurocontrol, Bavaria Fluggesellschaft Schwabe Co v. Eurocontrol, 9 10/77, 14
July 1977, [1977]ECR 1517 [1980] 1 CMLR 566 2.2.1.1, 6.2.1.4
European Night Services (ENS) and Others v Commission (T 374, 375, 384
388/94), 15 September 1998, [1998] ECR 11 3141, [1998] 5 CMLR 718,
[1998] CEC 955; appeal from Commission decision (94/663/EC, IV/34.600),
21 September 1994, OJ 1994, L259/20, [1995] 5 CMLR 76 1.4.3.2, 2.4.4.1,
2.4.4.7,2.4.6,2.4.4.7,4.3.1.2,4.3.10,5.2.5.5,13.2, 13.2.2.1,13.2.1.3.2,13.2.2,
13.2.3,14.1.1,14.1.3
ExxonlShell (94/322/EC, IV/33.640), 18 May 1994, OJ 1994, L144/20, [1994] 5
CMLR 19 (summary only), [1994] 2 CEC 2,060 13.2.1
Federation Nationale des Syndicats Exploitatants Agricoles and Others (French
Bovine Cartel) (2003/600/EC, COMP/C.38.279/F3), OJ 2003, L 209/12,
[2003] 5 CMLR 891 6.1.1
FEDETAB—GB Inno BM SA v Federation Belgo Luxembourgeoise des
Industries du Tabac (78/670/EEC), 20 July 1978, OJ 1978, L224/29, [1978] 3
CMLR 524, CMR 10070; on appeal Heintz van Landewyck Sari, Federation
Belgo Luxembourgeoise des Industries du Tabac Asbl v Commission (209 215
6 218/78), 29 October 1980, [1980] ECR 3125, [1981] 3 CMLR 134, CMR
8687 7.4.4,8.1.3, 8.3, 8.5,9.4, 9.7.2
FEN IN C 205/03 P, 11 July 2006, [2006] ECR 1 6295 Appeal from (T 319/99),
4 March 2003, [2003] ECR 11 357, [2003] 5 CMLR 34. 110 2.2.1.2.2,5.3.2,
6.2.1.3, 8.2.6
Ferriere Nord v Commission (C 219/95 P), July 17, 1997, [1997] ECR 1 4411,
[1997] 5 CMLR 575, [1998] CEC 19; appeal from Ferriere Nord v
Commission (T 143/89), [1995] ECR 11 917 and from Welded Steel Mesh
(89/515/EEC, IV/31.553), OJ 1989, L 260/1 2.4
Filtrona Espafiola SA v Commission (T 125/89), 10 July 1990, [1990] ECR
11 393, [1990] 4 CMLR 832; appeal from rejection of complaint,
Nineteenth Report on Competition Policy for 1989, point 61 4.3.1.2
FFSA and others v Ministere de I Agriculture et de la Peche (C 244/94),
16 November 1995, [1995] ECR 1 4013, [1996] 4 CMLR 536 (limits Poucet,
paras 17) 2.2.1.2.1, 6.2.1.2
Fine Papers—Re the Agreement of Papeteries Bellore SA and Braunstein Freres
SA (72/291/EEC), 26 July 1972, JO 1972, L182/24, [1972] CMLR D94,
CMR 9523 13.8.2
Finnpap—Finnish Paper Mills, Article 19(3) Notice, OJ 1989, C45/4, [1989]
4 CMLR 413, CMR 95072; press release describing comfort letter,
IP(89)496 8.2.3,14.1.2,13.2.5,14.1.2
xxxvi TABLE OF CASES
Fire Insurance—Verbandder Sachversicherer eV v Commission (45/85), 27
January 1987, [1987] ECR 405, [1988] 4 CMLR 264, CMR 14413 2.3.3
Floral—Re Floral Dungemitteherkaufsgesellschaft mbH (80/182/ EEC), 28
November 1979, OJ 1980, L39/51, [1980] 2 CMLR 285, CMR 10184 8.2.3
Ford Werke AG and Ford of Europe Inc v Commission (25 26/84), 17
September 1985, [1985] ECR 2725, [1985] 3 CMLR 528, CMR 14144 2.2.2.2
France v Commission (C 202/88), 19 March 1991, [1991] ECR 1 1223, [1992] 5
CMLR 552, [1993] 1 CEC 748 6.2.3, 12.3
France v Commission (C 69/94 and 30/95), 31 March 1998, [1998] ECR 1 1375,
[1998] 4 CMLR 829; appeal from Kali und Salz (IV/M.3O8), OJ 1993,
L395/1 2.2.1, 2.4.5, 4.3.5,12.3,12.4.1,12.5.1,12.5.4
Francovich v Italy (C 6 9/90), 19 November 1991, [1991] ECR 1 5357, [1993]
2 CMLR 66, [1993] 1 CEC 604 6.2.3, 6.5
French New Potatoes (Re) (88/109/EEC), 18 December 1987, OJ 1988, L59/25,
[1988] 4 CMLR 790, CMR 10978 1 2 5
French West African Shipowners Committees: Association of Danish
Shipowners and Denmark v Navale Delmas Afrique (92/262/EEC), 1 April
1992, OJ 1992, L134/1, [1993] 5 CMLR 446, [1992] 2 CEC 2,028 4.3.5
FRUBO—Nederlandse Vereniging voor de Fruit en Groentenimporthandel
FRUBO v Commission and Vereniging de Fruitunie (71/74), 15 May 1975,
[1975] ECR 563, [1975] 2 CMLR 123, CMR 8285 1.2.5, 2.2.3, 2.3.2
GEMA (71/224/CEE, IV/26 760), JO 1971, L134/15, [1971] CMLR D 35 ... 5.1,11.9
GencorlLonrho (IV/M.619), 24 April 1996, OJ 1997, LI 1/30, [1999] 4 CMLR
1076, [1997] CEC 2,055; appeal Gencor Ltd v Commission (T 102/96), 25
March 1999, [1999] ECR 11 753, [1999] 4 CMLR 971, [1999] CEC 395,
Merger Reporter B412, p 2485 . . 1.3.3.2,1.6,4.3.5,12.3.1,12.3.2,12.5.1,14.1.5.5
General Electric Aircraft Engines/Pratt Whitney (2000/182/EC), 14
September 1999, OJ 2000, L58/16, [2000] 5 CMLR 49, [2000[ CEC 2,172,
JV to produce aero engines for very large planes, exempt because provided
competitor to Rolls Royce 12.6.1
General Electric Co v. Commission December 14 2005 (T 210/01) [2005]
ECR II 5575, appeal from decision GEIHoneywell, 2004/134, [2004] OJ
L48/1 2.2.2.3, 2.4.6, 5.2.3, 12.6.1, 12.7.3,14.1.1
General Motors Continental NV v Commission (26/75), 13 November 1975,
[1975] ECR 1367, [1976] 1 CMLR 95, CMR 8320 5.3.1,5.4, 5.6
German Ceramic Tiles—Re the Discount Agreement of the
Interessengemeinschaft der Deutschen Keramischen Wand und
Bodenfiiesenwerke (71/23/EEC), 29 December 1970, JO 1971, L10/15,
[1971] CMLR D6, CMR 9409 2.3.2, 8.4
German Machine Blacksmiths—Re the business records of the Vereinigung
Deutscher Freiformschmieden (78/24/EEC), 8 December 1977, OJ 1978,
LI0/32, [1978] 1 CMLR D63, CMR 10004 7.4.2
Glaxo Wellcome (2001/791/EC, IV/36.957/F3), 8 May 2001. OJ 2001 L302/1
[2002] 4 CMLR 335, [2002] CEC 2,107 2.2.2.2
GlaxoSmithKline services Unlimited T 168/01, 27 December 2006, appeals
pending C 501/06 P 1.2.3.1, 2.2.2.2, 2.4, 2.4.2, 2.4.4.2, 2.4.4.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.3.3,
5.6,8.1.3,8.6,10.4.5.1
TABLE OF CASES xxxvii
Gosmel Martel—Vincent Gosme SA v Distribution Martell Piper SA
(91/335/EEC), 15 May 1991, OJ 1991, L185/23, [1992] 5 CMLR 586, [1991]
2 CEC 2,110 2.2.1.1
Gottrup Klim (C 250/92), December 15, 1994, [1994] ECR 15641, [1996] 4
CMLR 191, [1995] 1 CEC 461 9.6.1.3
Grosfillex Sdrl (Re the Agreement of) (64/233/EEC), 11 March 1964, JO
915/64, [1964] CMLR 237 9.3
Groupement des Fabricants de Papiers Peints de Belgique v Commission (73/74),
26 November 1975, [1975] ECR 1491, [1976] 1 CMLR 589, CMR 8335 . 2.3.1, 9.3
Grundig—see Consten Grundig.
Grundig II (85/404/EEC), 10 July 1985, OJ 1985, L233/1, [1988] 4 CMLR 865,
CMR 10701 9.4
Guerlain—Procureur de la Republique v Giry and Guerlain (253/78 1 3/79), 10
July 1980, [1980] ECR 2327, [1981] 2 CMLR 99, CMR 8712 7.3.4.2
GVL (Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH) v
Commission (7/82), 2 March 1983, [1983] ECR 483, [1983] 3 CMLR 645,
CMR 8910 5.3.4.1
Hag II—CNL Sucal v Hag (C 10/89), 17 October 1990, [1990] ECR 1 3711,
[1990] 3 CMLR 571, [1991] 2 CEC 457 10.4.4
Hasselblad (GB) Ltd v Commission (86/82), 21 February 1984, [1984] ECR
883, [1984] 1 CMLR 559, CMR 14014 8.6.1
Hauptzollamt Mainz v CA Kupfirberg Cie KG (104/81), 26 October 1982,
[1982] ECR 3641, [1983] 1 CMLR 1, CMR 8877 10.4.6
Hercules v Commission (see also Polypropylene cases) (T 7/89),
17 December 1991, [1991] ECR 11 1711, [1992] 4 CMLR 84, [1992] 1 CEC
207 (CFI); Hercules v Commission (C 51/92 P), 8 July 1999, [1999] ECR
1 4235 (ECJ) 2.2.2.1, 7.5.1, 7.5.3
Hilti—Eurofix Ltd and Bauco ( UK) Ltd v Hilti AG (88/138/EEC), 22
December 1987, OJ 1988, L65/19, [1989] 4 CMLR 677, CMR 10976; on
appeal Hilti AG v Commission (T 30/89), 12 December 1991, [1991] ECR
11 1439, [1992] 4 CMLR 16, [1992] 1 CEC 155 (CFI); Hilti AG v EC
Commission (C 53/92P), 2 March 1994, [1994] ECR 1 666, [1994] 1 CMLR
590, [1994] 1 CEC 590 (ECJ) 4.3.3, 5.2.3, 5.2.3.4.1, 5.2.3.4.2, 5.2.3.4.4
Hoechst A G and Others v Commission (46/87 227/88), 21 September 1989,
[1989] ECR 2859, [1991] 4 CMLR 410, [1991] 1 CEC 280 7.4.2, 7.5.1
Hoffmann La Roche Co AG v Centrafarm Vertriebsgesellschaft
Pharmazeutischer Erzeugnisse GmbH (102/77), 23 May 1978, [1978] ECR
1139, [1978] 3 CMLR 217, CMR 8466 4.3.4.1.2, 10.4.4.1
Hoffmann La Roche Co AGv Commission (85/76), 13 February 1979, [1979]
ECR 461, [1979] 3 CMLR 211, appeal from decision, OJ 1976, L223/27,
[1976] 2 CMLR D25 1.2, 5.1.1, 5.2, 5.2.2, 5.2.2.1.2, 5.2.2.1.3, 5.2.2.4, 5.2.6,
5.2.6.1,14.1.5
Hoffmann La Roche Co AG ( Vitamins Cartel) (2003/2/EC), OJ 2003, L6/1,
[2003] 4 CMLR 1030, [2003] CEC 2,418 1.7
Hofner and Elser v Macrotron GmbH(C 41/90), 23 April 1991, [1991] ECR
1 1979, [1993] 4 CMLR 306, [1993] 1 CEC 238 2.2.1.1,4.3.2, 6.2.1.1,6.2.2
Hugin—Liptons Cash Registers and Business Equipment Ltd v Hugin
Kassaregister AB (78/68/EEC), 8 December 1977, OJ 1978, L22/23, [1978] 1
xxxviii TABLE OF CASES
CMLR D19, CMR 10007; on appeal Hugin Kassaregister AB v Commission
(22/78), 31 May 1979, [1979] ECR 1869, [1979] 3 CMLR 345, CMR 8524 .. 2.3.?
4.3.3,5.2.4.4,5.2.5.1,5.6
Hydrotherm Geratebau GmbH v Compact de Don Ing Mario Andreoli e C Sets
(170/83), 12 July 1984, [1984] ECR 2999, [1985] 3 CMLR 627,
CMR 14112 22U
IBM v Commission (C 60/81), 11 Nov 1981, [1981] ECR 2639, [1981] 3 CMLR
635, CMR 8708; see also Fourteenth Report on Competition Policy, point
77 7.5.5
Ideal Standards Distribution System (85/45/EEC), 10 December 1984, OJ
1985, L20/38, [1988] 4 CMLR 627, [1988] CMR 10662 9A
Ideal Standard—IHT Internazionale Heiztechnik GmbH v Ideal Standard
GmbH (C 9/93), 22 June 1994, [1994] ECR 1 2789, [1994] 3 CMLR 857,
[1994] 2 CEC 222 10 4 4
IFTRA Rules for Producers of Virgin Aluminium (75/497/EEC), 15 July 1975,
OJ 1975, L228/3, [1975] CMLR D20 8 2.1
IFTRA Rules on Glass Containers—Re European Glass Manufacturers
(74/292/EEC), 15 May 1974, OJ 1974, L160/1, [1974] 2 CMLR D50, CMR
9658 8.2.2
IMS interim order of Commission (2002/165/EC, COMP D3/38.044),
3 July 2001, OJ 2002, L59/18, [2002] 4 CMLR 58, [2002] CEC 2,234, . .. 5.2.5.5.1,
5.2.2.5.2
IMS Health v Commission //(T 184/01 R II), 26 October 2001, OJ 2002,
C144/45, [2002] 4 CMLR 58 (order of the President of the CFI suspending
the duty to license), NDC Health v Commission (C 481/01 P(R)), 11 April
2002, [2002] ECR 1 3401, [2002] 5 CMLR 44, confirmed by the President
of the ECJ, NDC Health v IMS Health (2003/741/EC, COMP D3/38.044),
13 August 2003, OJ 2003, L268/69, [2003] 5 CMLR 820 (withdrawal of
interim decision) 5.2.5.5.1
Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association v. Commission,
(IMPALA), 13 July 2006, T 464/04 7.5.2, 12.4.3, 14.1.5.5
Inno (GB Inno BM NV) v ATAB ( Vereniging van de Kleinhandelaars in
Tabak) (13/77), 16 November 1977, [1977] ECR 2115, [1978] 1 CMLR 283,
CMR 8442 6.1.3
Institut des Mandataires Agrees v Commission (EPI) (T 144/99), 28 March
2001, [2001] ECR 11 1087, [2001] 5 CMLR 2 2.2.1.2.3
Indium (97/39/EC), 18 December 1996, OJ 1997, L18/87, [1997] 4 CMLR
1065, [1997] CEC 2,104 13.2.1.3.1
Irish Sugar (C 497/99 R), 10 July 2001, [2001] ECR 1 5332, [2001] 5 CMLR
1082 2.2.1.1, 4.3.5, 5.2.2,5.2.2.2,5.2.2.4,5.2.7.3, 5.4
Italian Cast Glass—The Community v Fabbrica Pisana SpA and Others
(80/1334/EEC), 17 December 1980, OJ 1980, L383/19, [1982] 2 CMLR 61,
CMR 10285 2.2.1.1, 4.3.5
Italian Flat Glass—Industria Vetraria Alfonso Cobelli v Fabbrica Pisana SpA
and Others (89/93/EEC), 7 December 1988, OJ 1989, L33/44, [1990] 4
CMLR 535, [1989] 1 CEC 2,077; on appeal Societa Italiana Vetro SpA v
Commission (T 68, 77 78/89), 10 March 1992, [1992] ECR 11 1403, [1992]
5 CMLR 302, [1992] 2 CEC 33 2.2.2.3,4.3.5,4.3.10,7.5.3
k
i
TABLE OF CASES xxxix
Italy v Commission (Re British Telecommunications) (41/83), 20 March 1985,
[1985] ECR 873, [1985] 2 CMLR 368, CMR 14168 6.2.1
Italy Poste Italiane SpA (2001/176/EC), 21 December 2000, OJ 2001,
L63/59, [2001] 5 CMLR 595 (not in CEC) 5.2.7.2
Javico International and Javico AGv Yves Saint Laurent Parfums SA
(C 306/96), 28 April 1998, [1998] ECR 1 1983, [1998] 5 CMLR 172, [1998]
CEC 813 9.6.4,10.6
JCB Service v Commission (T 67/01), 13 Jan 2004, OJ 2004, C85/23, [2004] 4
CMLR 1346 1.4.3.2
KaliundSalz AG andKali Chemie v Commission (19 20/74), 14 May 1975,
[1975] ECR 499, [1975] 2 CMLR 154, CMR 8284 2.4.5
Kali und Salz/MdklTreuhand(lVIM.3M), OJ 1994, LI86/38, Merger Reporter
B178, p 1282.1 and 1284.3, [1994] 2 CEC 2,090; on appeal France v
Commission (C 68/94 30/95) [1998] ECR 1 1453, [1998] 4 CMLR 829 ... 12.3.1,
12.5.1
Keurkoop BV v Nancy Kean Gifts BV{144/81), 14 September 1982, [1982] ECR
2853, [1983] 2 CMLR 47, CMR 8861 10.4.1,10.4.2, 10.4.6, 10.5.1
KEWA—ReKernbrennstoff Wiederaufarbeitungs Gesellschaft GmbH
(76/249/EEC), 23 December 1975, OJ 1976, L51/15, [1976] 2 CMLR D15,
CMR 9807 1.3.3.2.1,4.3.1.2
Konsortium(90/446/EEC), 27 July 1990, OJ 1990, L228/31, [1992] 4 CMLR 54,
[1990] 2 CEC 2,082 13.2.1.3.1
Friedrich Kremzow v Austria (C 299/95), 20 May 1997, [1997] ECR 1 2629,
[1997] 3 CMLR 1289 7.5.1
Kyowa Hakko Kogyo and Another v Commission (T 223/00), 9 July 2003, OJ
2003, C213/27, [2003] ECR 11 2553 7.6.1, 8.2
La Crespelle—Societe Civile Agricole du Centre v dInsemination Artificielle du
Departement de la Mayenne (C 323/93), 5 October 1994, [1994] ECR 1 5077 . 4.3.6
Langnese Iglo GmbH Co KG (93/406/EEC), 23 December 1992, OJ 1993,
L183/19, [1994] 4 CMLR 51, [1993] 2 CEC 2,123; on appeal Langnese Iglo
GmbH Co KG v Commission (T 7/93), 8 June 1995, [1995] ECR 11 1533,
[1995] 5 CMLR 602, [1995] 2 CEC 217, paras 94 113; the final appeal did
not consider much of the substance, (C 279/95 P), 1 October 1998, [1998]
ECR 1 5609, [1998] 5 CMLR 933 3.1.2.1, 9.6.6,14.1.2
Leclerc—Association des Centres Distributees EdouardLeclerc v Au Ble Vert
Sari (229/83), 10 January 1985, [1985] ECR 1, [1985] 2 CMLR 286, CMR
14111 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.1.5,6.8.4, 9.4
Leclerc (Association des Centres Distributeurs Edouardj v Commission
(T 88/92), 12 December 1996, [1996] ECR II 1961, appeal from Givenchy
(92/428/EEC, IV/33.542), 24 July 1992, OJ 1992, L236/11, [1993] 5 CMLR
579, [1992] 2 CEC 208; a virtually identical judgment under the same
names was given (T 19/92), 12 December 1996, [1996] ECR 11 1851, [1997]
4 CMLR 995, on appeal from Parfums Yves Saint Laurent (92/33/EEC,
IV/33.242), 16 December 1991, OJ 1992, L12/24, [1993] 4 CMLR 120,
[1992] 1 CEC 2,071 1.5.2, 7.2,14.1.2
Levi Strauss v Tesco (C 414 16/99), 20 Nov 2001, [2001] ECR 1 8691, [2002] 1
CMLR 1, [2002] CEC 154 10.6
xl TABLE OF CASES
Librairies de Normandie (Syndicat des) v L Aigle Distribution SA, Centre
Leclerc (254/87), 14 July 1988, [1988] ECR 4457, [1990] 4 CMLR 37, [1990]
1 CEC 94 6L5
Louis Erauw Jacquery—see Erauw Jacquery.
Lucazeau v SACEM (110/88), 13 My 1989, [1989] ECR 2811, [1991] 4 CMLR
248, [1990] 2 CEC 856 5.1.1, 1L9
Magill TV Guide (Re the): ITP, BBC and RTE v Commission (89/205/EEC), 21
December 1988, OJ 1989, L78/43, [1989] 4 CMLR 757, [1989] 1 CEC 2,223;
on appeal Radio Telefis Eireann and Others v Commission (T 69, 70, 76 77
91/89), 10 July 1991, [1991] ECR 11 485 et seq, [1991] 4 CMLR 586 et
seq, [1991] 2 CEC 114, 147 174 (CFI); Radio Telefis Eireann and Others v
Commission (C 241 242/91 P), 6 April 1995, [1995] ECR 1 743, [1995] 4
CMLR 718, [1995] 1 CEC 400 (ECJ) 4.3.3, 5.2.5.2, 5.2.5.3, 5.2.5.5.1,
5.2.2.5.2,10.6
Maize Seed—see Nungesser.
Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico Assicurazioni Spa and other cases, C 294 298/04, 13
July 2006 7.2
Masterfoods Ltd and HB Ice Cream v Commission (C 344/98), 14 Dec 2000,
[2000] ECR 1 1136, [2001] CMLR 449 3.1.1, 7.3.4
Meng ( Wolf W) (C 2/91), 17 November 1993, [1993] ECR 1 5751 6.1.4
Merci Convenzionali Porto di Genova v Siderurgica Gabrielli (C 179/90), 10
December 1991, [1991] ECR 1 5889, [1994] 4 CMLR 422, [1994] 1 CEC 196
4.3.1.2, 4.3.6,5.2.4.5, 6.2, 6.2.3
Merck Co Inc v Primecrown Limited (C 267 268/95), 5 December 1996,
[1996] ECR 1 6285, [1997] 1 CMLR 83, [1997] 1 CEC 261 10.4.5,14.1.2.1
Merck Co Inc v Stephar BF(187/80), 14 July 1981, [1981] ECR 2063, [1981]
3 CMLR 463, CMR 8707 10.4.1,10.4.2,10.7,14.1.2.1,14.1.4
Metro I—Metro v Commission (26/76), 25 October 1977, [1977] ECR 1875,
[1978] 2 CMLR 1, CMR 8435 1.3.2.5,1.3.2.7, 2.4.4.4, 9.4
Metro II—Metro SB Grofimiirkte GmbH Co KG v Commission (75/84), 22
October 1986, [1986] ECR 3021, [1987] 1 CMLR 118, CMR 14326 14.1.2.1
Mi tropole I—Metropole Television SA and Others v Commission (T 528, 542,
543, 546/93), 11 July 1996, [1996] ECR 11 649, [1996] 5 CMLR 386, [1996]
CEC 794; appeal from EBU 3.1.1.1, 7.5.5,14.1.2
Metropole (T 206/99), 21 March 2001, [2001] ECR 11 1057, [2001] 4 CMLR
1423 2.4.4.2.1, 3.1.1.1, 14.1.2.1
Metropole Television (M6) and Others v Commission II (T l 12/99), 18
September 2001, [2002] ECR 11 2459, [2001] 5 CMLR 1236 .... 11.5.1,13.2.1.3.2
Mkhelin I Bandengroothandel Frieschehrug BVv Nederlandsche
Banden Industrie Mkhelin A l/(81/969/EEC), 7 October 1981, OJ 1981,
L353/33, [1982] 1 CMLR 643, CMR 10340; on appeal Nederlandsche
Banden Industrie Mkhelin v Commission (322/81), 9 November 1983, [1983]
ECR 3461, [1985] 1 CMLR 282, CMR 14031 .... 1.3.3.2, 4.3.1.1, 4.3.1.2, 4.3.1.4,
4.3.8,4.3.10, 5.2.2.1.2,5.2.2.4,5.2.3.1.4, 8.4
Mkhelin //(2002/405/EC), OJ 2002, L143/1, [2002] 5 CMLR 388, [2002] CEC
2,503; on appeal (T 203/01), 30 Sept 2003, [2003] ECR 11 4071, [2004] 4
CMLR 923 4.3.1.2,5.1.2,5.2.2,5.2.2.1.4,5.2.2.1.5,5.2.2.4,5.2.3.4.4,
5.3.3,14.1.5.4
TABLE OF CASES xli
Micro Leader Business (T 198/98), 16 December 1999, [1999] ECR 11 3989,
[2000] 4 CMLR 886, [2000] CEC 540 10.6
Microsoft March 24 2004, europa.eu.int/comm./competition/index en, [2005] 4
CMLR 965 1.3.3.2.2, 4.3.4.1.1, 4.3.4.1.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.3.4.4, 5.2.2.5.2, 14.1.5
Microsoft v. Commission, T 201/04, [2005 ] 4 CMLR 406, (CFI interim order,
refusing to suspend remedies granted by Commission, IP (04)382), [2004] 4
CMLR 1231 1.4.3.1
Milchfdrderungsfonds, The Community v (85/76/EEC), 7 December 1984, OJ
1985, L35/35, [1985] 3 CMLR 101, CMR 10649 8.6.2
Miller International Schallplatten GmbH v Commission (19/77), 1 February
1978, [1978] ECR 131, [1978] 2 CMLR 334, CMR 8439 .... 2.4.2, 2.4.6, 8.6, 11.3
Ministere Public v Asjes—see Nouvelles Frontieres.
Ministere Public v Tournier—see SAC EM.
Mitchell CottslSofiltra—Re Mitchell Cotts Air Filtration Ltd (811W0IEEC), 17
December 1986, OJ 1987, L41/31, [1988] 4 CMLR 111, CMR 10852 14.1.2
Mitsubishi Corp. and Union Carbide Corp. (UCAR), Re the Concentration
between (IV/M.024), 4 January 1991, [1992] 4 CMLR M50, Merger
Reporter, B.7, p. 37 12.2.2
Musik Vertrieb Membran GmbH v Gesellschaft fur Musikalische Auffuhrungs
und Mechanische Vervielfdltigungsrechte (GEMA) (55 57/80), 20 January
1981, [1981] ECR 147, [1981] 2 CMLR 44, CMR 8670 10.4.2
Napier Brown Co Ltd v British Sugar pic (88/518/EEC), 18 July 1988, OJ
1988, L284/41, [1990] 4 CMLR 196 5.2.7.3
National Panasonic—The Community v National Panasonic (UK) Ltd
(82/853/EEC), 7 December 1982, OJ 1982, L354/28, [1983] 1 CMLR 497,
CMR 10441; on appeal National Panasonic (UK) Ltd v Commission
(136/79), 26 June 1980, [1980] ECR 2033, [1980] 3 CMLR 169, CMR 8682 . . 7.4.2
Nungesser (LG) KG and Kurt Eisele v Commission (258/78), 8 June 1982,
[1982] ECR 2015, [1983] 1 CMLR 278, CMR 8805, appeal from OJ 1978,
L286/23 2.4.4.2.1,8.1.2,8.1.3, 11.2, 11.3,14.1.1
Nuovo Cegam—Re the Application by Nuovo Consorzio Centrale Guasti alle
Macchine (84/191/EEC), 30 March 1984, OJ 1984, L99/29, [1984] 2 CMLR
484, CMR 10584 8.2.2
Nutricia—Re the Agreements of Verenigde Bedrijven Nutricia NV
(83/670/EEC), 12 December 1983, OJ 1983, L376/22, [1984] 2 CMLR 165,
CMR 10567; appeal sub nom Remia 8.1.2
NVIAZ International Belgium and Others v Commission—see Anseau.
02 (Germany) GmbH Co. OHG v. Commission, 2 May 2006. (T 328 03).
[2006] ECR 11 000 13.2.1.3.2
ODIN—ElopaklMetal Box Odin Developments Ltd(90/410/EEC), 13 July
1990, OJ 1990, L209/15, [1991] 4 CMLR 832, [1990] 2 CEC 2,066 2.4.4.7,
13.2.1.3.1, 13.2.3,14.1.1,14.1.2,14.1.3
Ohra—Officier van Justitie v Ohra Shadeverzekeringen (C 245/91), 17
November 1993, [1993] ECR 1 5851 6.1.4
Olivetti/Digital (94/771/EC), 11 November 1994, OJ 1994, L309/24, [1995] 1
CEC 2,082 13.2.1.3.1
xlii TABLE OF CASES
Optical Fibres (Re) (86/405/EEC), 14 July 1986, OJ 1986, L236/30, CMR
10813 13.2.1.3,13.2.4,14.1.1
Organic Peroxides Cartel, 10 Dec 2003, Press Release IP 03/1700, [2004] 4
CMLR 259 7 61
Orkem v Commission (374/87), 18 October 1989, [1989] ECR 3283, [1991] 4
CMLR 502, [1991] 2 CEC 19. (see SGL Carbon below) 7.4.1, 7.4.2,7.5.1
Oscar Bronner GmbH Co KG v Mediaprint Zeitungs und Zeitschriftenverlag
GmbH Co KG and Others (C 7/97), 26 November 1998, [1998] ECR
1 7817, [1999] 4 CMLR 112, [1999] CEC 53 1.3.3.2, 5.2.5.4,14.1.5,14.1.5.1
Parfums Givenchy, Re the Selective Distribution System of see Leclerc.
Parfums Yves Saint Laurent (92/33/EEC), 16 December 1991, OJ 1992, L12/24,
[1993] 4 CMLR 120, [1992] 1 CEC 2,071 9.4
Parke, Davis Co v Probel (24/67), 29 Feb 1968, [1968] ECR 55, [1968]
CMLR 47, CMR 8054 4.3.1.1, 4.3.2,4.3.10
Pavlov and Another v Stichting Pensioensfond Medische Specialistenond
Medische Specialisten (C 180/98), [2000] ECR 1 6451, [2001] 4 CMLR 30 2.2.1.2.3
Peterbroeck, Van Campenhout Cie v Belgian State (C 312/93), 14 December
1995, [1995] ECR 1 4599, [1996] 1 CMLR 793 1.5.2, 7.2
Petroflna (T 2/89), 24 October 1991, [1991] ECR 11 1087 2.2.2.3
Pfizer Inc v Eurim Pharm GmbH (1/81), 3 December 1981, [1981] ECR 2913,
[1982] 1 CMLR 406, CMR 8737 10.4.4.1
Pharmon BV v Hoechst AG (19/84), 9 July 1985, [1985] ECR 2281, [1985] 3
CMLR 775, CMR 14206 10.4.1
Philip Morris, Fourteenth Report on Competition Policy, point 98; appeal sub
nom BAT v Commission 13.2
Pigs Bacon Commission v McCarren and Co Ltd (111Hi), 26 June 1979,
[1979] ECR 2161, [1979] 3 CMLR 389, CMR 8592 4.3.6
Pioneer—Re Pioneer Hi Fi Equipment (80/256/EEC), 14 December 1979, OJ
1980, L60/21, [1980] 1 CMLR 457, CMR 10185; on appeal Musique
Diffusion Francaise SA v Commission (100 103/80), 7 June 1983, [1983]
ECR 1825, [1983] 3 CMLR 221, CMR 8880 1.7, 7.4.2,7.5.5
Pittsburg Corning Europe (Re) (72/403/EEC), 23 November 1972, JO 1972,
L272/35, [1973] CMLR D2, CMR 9539 9.7.1
Plaumunn v Commission (25/62), 15 July 1963, [1963] ECR 95, [1964] CMLR
29, CMR 8013 3.1.1.1
PMIIDSV(951373/EC, IV/33.375), 31 January 1995, OJ 1995 L221/34, [1996] 5
CMLR 320, [1995] 2 CEC 2,169 10.4.1
Polistili Arbois and Arbois Modelud (Re the Agreement Between) (84/282/EEC),
16 May 1984, OJ 1984, L136/9, [1984] 2 CMLR 594, CMR 10587 8.6.1
Polydor Ltd and RSO Records Inc v Harlequin Record Shops Ltd (270/80), 9
February 1982, [1982] ECR 329, [1982] 1 CMLR 677, CMR 8806 .. 10.4.6
Polypropylene—Re Polypropylene Cartel: The Commission v IClpic
(86/398/EEC), 23 April 1986, OJ 1986, L230/1, [1988] 4 CMLR 347, CMR
10782 and 10851; See also Hercules; on appeal (T l 4, 6 15/89), 17
December 1991, [1991] ECR 11 869 et seq, [1992] 4 CMLR 84 !... 2.2.2.3,2.2.4.2
Portuguese Airports Landing Fees (1999/199/EC, IV/35.703), 10 February 1999,
OJ 1999, L 69/31, [1999] 5 CMLR 103; in ECJ see Portuguese Republic v ,
TABLE OF CASES xliii
Commission (C 163/99), 29 March 2001, [2001] ECR 1 2613, [2002] 4
CMLR 1319 5.2.2.3, 5.2.2.4,14.1.5.3
Postbank v Commission (T 353/94), 18 September 1996, [1996] ECR 11 921,
[1997] 1 CMLR 33, [1997] CEC 454 7.3.4.3, 7.4.4
Poucet—Christian Poucet v Assurances Generates de France (AGP) and Caisse
Mutuelle Regionale du Languedoc Roussillion (Camulrac) and Daniel Pistre
v Caisse Autonome Nationale de Compensation de I Assurance Vieillesse des
Artisans (Cancava) (C 159 160/91), 17 February 1993, [1993] ECR 1 637,
[1993] 4 CMLR 401 2.2.1.2.1, 6.2.1.2
Pre insulated Pipe Cartel (1999/60/EC, IV/35.691/E 4), 21 October 1998, OJ
1999, L24/1, [1998] CMLR 402, [1999] 1 CEC 2,020; appeals, LR AF1998
AIS v Commission (T 23/99), 20 March 2002, [2002] ECR 11 1705, [2002] 5
CMLR 571 (CFI); Judgment of the ECJ in Pre insulated Pipe Cartel,
Dansk Rorindustri AIS v Commission and others (C 189, 202, 205 208/02 P)
June 28 2005. [2005] ECR I 5425 1.7
Promedia ITT NVv Commission, supported by Belgacom (T l 11/96), 17 July
1998, [1998] ECR 11 2937, [1998] 5 CMLR 491 5.2.7.2
Pronuptia (87/17/EEC), 17 December 1986, OJ 1987, L13/39, [1989] 4 CMLR
355, CMR 10854; in ECJ Pronuptia de Paris GmbH v Pronuptia de Paris
Irmgard Schillgalis (161/84), 28 January 1986, [1986] ECR 353, [1986] 1
CMLR 414, CMR 14245. .. 1.2.1, 2.3.3, 3.1.2.3, 2.4.4.2.1, 8.1.2, 8.1.3, 9.5.1, 9.6.5
PVC Cartel (89/190/EEC), 21 December 1988, OJ 1989, L74/1, [1990] 4
CMLR 345, [1989] 1 CEC 2,167, decision annulled on formal grounds
Hercules v Commission (T 7/89), 17 December 1991, [1991] ECR 11 1711,
[1992] 1 CEC 207, BASF and Others (T 79/89), 27 February 1992, 1992
ECR 11 315, [1992] 4 CMLR 357; on appeal to ECJ, Commission of the
European Communities v BASF AG and Others (C 137/92 P), 15 June 1994,
[1994] ECR 1 2555 2.2.2.1,7.6.1
PVC II, joined cases, Limburgse Vinyl and Others v Commission (T 305 307,
313,315 316, 318, 325, 328 329, 335/94), 20 April 1999, [1999] ECR II 945,
[1999] 5 CMLR 303; appeal to ECJ, (C 238, 244 245, 247, 250 252/99 P), 15
October 2002, [2002] ECR 1 8375, [2003] 4 CMLR 397, cases joined for the
purposes of the judgment 7.3.3, 7.5, 8.2
Quantel International—Continuum!Quantel SA (92/427/EEC), 27 July 1992, OJ
1992, L235/9, [1993] 5 CMLR 497, [1992] 2 CEC 2,208 2.2.1.1, 8.1.2
Quinine Cartel (Re) (69/240/EEC), 16 July 1969, JO 1969, L192/5, [1969]
CMLR D41, CMR 9313; for appeal see ACF Chemiefarma 8.2, 8.2.4
Radio Tele/is Eireann—see Magill.
RAIIUNITEL~Re Unitel Film und Fernseh Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
Co (78/516/EEC), 26 May 1978, OJ 1978, L157/39, [1978] 3 CMLR 306,
CMR 10054 2.2.1.2.3, 7.4.1
RanklSopelem—Re the Agreements of Societe d Optique Precision,
Electronique et Mecanique and Rank Precision Industries Ltd (75/76/EEC),
20 December 1974, OJ 1975, L29/20, [1975] 1 CMLR D72, CMR 9707 13.8.2
Reiff Bundesanstaltfurden Guterfernverkehr (C 185/91), 17 November 1993,
[1993] ECR 1 5801, [1995] 5 CMLR 145 6.1.4
Remia BVand Verenigde Bedrijven Nutricia v Commission (42/84), 11 July
1985, [1985] ECR 2545, [1987] 1 CMLR 1, CMR 14217 8.1.2,14.1.2.1
xliv TABLE OF CASES
Rennet Stremsel v Commission (61/80), 25 March 1981, [1981] ECR 851,
[1982] 1 CMLR 240, CMR 8709 9.6.1.3,13.2.5
ReuterlBASF(76/743/EEC), 26 July 1976, OJ 1976, L254/40, [1976] 2 CMLR
D44, CMR 9862 2.2.1.2.3
Reynolds v Commission—see BAT v Commission.
Rhone Poulenc v Commission—see Polypropylene.
Rich Products/Jus Rol(HIU3IEEC, IV/31.206), 22 December 1987, OJ 1988
L69/21,[1981]4CMLR527, CCH 10,925 H.3
Roquette Freres v Director General for Competition (C 94/00), 22 Oct 2002,
[2002] ECR 1 9011, [2003] 4 CMLR 46 7.4.2
SACEM cases (395/87, 110, 241 242/88), 13 July 1989, [1989] ECR 2565,
[1991] 4 CMLR 248, [1990] 2 CEC 815 and 856; see also Ministere Public v
Tournier (395/87), 13 July 1989, [1989] ECR 2565, [1991] 4 CMLR 248,
[1990] 2 CEC 815, and Lucazeau v SACEM (110/88), 13 July 1989, [1989]
ECR 2811, [1991] 4 CMLR 248, [1990] 2 CEC 856 2.2.4.2, 5.3.1, 11.9
SAFCO—Re the Societe Anonyme de Fabricants de Conserves Alimentaires
(72/23/EEC), 16 December 1971, JO 1972, L13/44, [1972] CMLR D83,
CMR 9492 13.2.5
Salonia v Poidomani (126/80), 16 June 1981, [1981] ECR 1563, [1982] 1 CMLR
64, CMR 8758 8.1.3, 8.3,9.4
Sandoz Prodotti Farmaceutici SpA v Commission (C 277/87), 11 January 1990,
[1990] ECR 1 45 2.2.2.2
Schneider!Legrand(T 3WIQX), 22 October 2002, [2002] ECR 11 4071, [2003] 4
CMLR 768 1.4.3.2, 2.2.2.3,12.4.2, 14.1.1
Scholler Lebensmittel GmbH Co KG and Langnese (93/405 and 406/EEC), 23
December 1992, OJ 1993, L183/19, [1994] 4 CMLR 51, [1993] 2 CEC 2,101
2.4.4.7, 3.1.2.1,14.1.2
Sea LinklB I Holy head (IV/34.174), interim measures, 11 June 1992, [1992] 5
CMLR 255 4.3.6, 5.2.4.5
SEP (C 36/92 P), 19 May 1994, [1994] ECR 1 1911 7.4.1
Shell v Commission (Polypropylene) (T ll/89), 10 March 1992, [1992] ECR
11 757 2.2.4.2, 7.5.1
SHVIChevron—Re the Application of Steenkolen Handelsvereeniging NVand
Chevron Oil Europe Inc (75/95/EEC), 20 December 1974, OJ 1975, L38/14,
[1975] I CMLR D68, CMR 9709 12.2.2
Syfait ami Others v Glaxowellcome (C 53/03), [2003] 4 CMLR 925, reference
from Greek competition authority; Opinion Jacobs, 28 October 2004 .... 1.3.2.1,
2.2.2.2, 2.3.1, 5.2,5.2.2, 5.2.2.4,5.2.5.5.2,14.1.4,14.2.4
Sigma Tecnologie v Commission (T 28/99), 20 March 2002, [2002] ECR
11 1845 2.2.2.1
Silhouette Internationale Schmied GmbH Co KC v Hartlauer Handellshaft
mbh (C 355/96), 16 July 1998, [1998] ECR 1 4799, [1998] 2 CMLR 953
[1998] CEC 676 10.6
Sirena Sri v Eda Sri (40/70), 18February 1971, [1971] ECR 69, [1971] CMLR
260, CMR 8101 10.4.4
SMM T Exhibition Agreement (83/666/EEC, IV/27.492), 5 December 1983
OJ 1983, L376/1, [1984] 1 CMLR 611, CMR 552 2.2.3, 2.3.2 ;
|
t
TABLE OF CASES xlv
Societe de Vente de Ciments et Bitons de I Est SA v Kerpen Kerpen GmbH
Co KG (319/82), 14 December 1983, [1983] ECR 4173, CMR 14043 2.3.2
Societe La Technique Miniere v Maschinenbau Ulm GmbH (56/65), 30 June
1966, [1966] ECR 235, [1966] CMLR 357, CMR 8047 1.2.1, 1.5.2, 2.4, 2.4.3,
2.4.4, 2.4.4.2, 2.4.4.2.1, 2.4.4.7, 2.5, 7.3.4.1, 8.1.3, 9.3,
11.2,14.1.2,14.1.2.1,14.2.1
Soda Ash—Sohay et Cie v Commission (90/299 300/EEC), 19 December
1990, OJ 1991, L152/21 and 40, [1994] 4 CMLR 645, [1991] 2 CEC 2,028
and 2,053; appeals from this decision were formal; Commission v ICI
fC 286/95 P) and Commission v Solvay (C 287/95 P and 288/95 P), 6 April
2000, [2000] ECR 1 2341 and 2391, [2000] 5 CMLR 413 and 454 5.2.2.1,
5.2.2.4, 7.5.3, 7.6.3
Solvay SA v Commission (T 32/91), 29 une 1995, [1995] ECR 11 1775, [1996]
CEC 196 5.2.2.1, 5.2.2.4, 7.5.3
Spanish Banks—Direction General de Defensa de la Competencia v Association
Espaha de la Banco Privada (AEB) and Others (C 67/91), 16 July 1992,
[1992] ECR 1 4785 7.3.3
SPAR—Re Intergroup Trading BK(75/482/EEC), 14 July 1975, OJ 1975,
L212/23, [1975] 2 CMLR D14, CMR 9759 8.1.3, 8.2.3, 13.2.5
SSI—Stichting Sigarettenindustrie v Commission (240 242, 261, 262, 268
269/82), 10 December 1985, [1985] ECR 3831, [1987] 3 CMLR 661, CMR
14265 8.1.3
Stergios Delimitis—see Delimitis (Stergios).
Stremsel v Commission—see Rennet.
Sugar Cartel—Re the European Sugar Cartel: Cooperative Vereniging Suiker
Unie UA v Commission (40 48, 50, 54 56, 111 113 14/73), 16 December
1975, [1975] ECR 1663, [1976] 1 CMLR 295, CMR 8334 .. 2.2.1.1, 2.2.4.2, 2.4.6
4.3.6,5.1,5.2.2.1.1,9.7.1
Suiker Unie—see Sugar Cartel.
Syfait—Synetairismos Fannakopoion Aitolias Akarnanias (Syfait) and Ors.
V Glxosmithkline AEVE (C 53/03), May 31 2005, [2005] ECR 1 4609,
[2005] 5 CMLR 7 8.6
T MobilelTele.ring M3916, IP/06/535 12.3.2
TAA( Trans Atlantic Agreement) —Atlantic Container Line AB and others v
Commission (T 395/94), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR 11 875, [2002] 4
CMLR 1008; appeal from Trans Atlantic Agreement (94/980/EC,
IV/34.446), 19 October 1994, OJ 1994, L 376/1 4.3.1.1
TACA—Trans Atlantic Conference Agreement (1999/243/EC, 1V/35.134), 16
September 1998, OJ 1999, L95/1, [1999] CEC 2,294 (withdrew immunity
from fines); on appeal, Atlantic Container Line A Band others v Commission
(T 18/97), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR II 1125, [2002] 4 CMLR 1232,
TACA—Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission (T 191
212 214/98), September 30 2003, OJ 2004, C7/29, [2003] ECR 11 3275 .... 4.3.4.3
Tate Lyle, British Sugar, Napier Brown v Commission—see British Sugar.
Telemarketing—Centre Beige d Etudes du Marche Telemarketing SA (CBEM)
v Compagnie Luxembourgeoise de Telediffusion (311/84), 3 October 1985,
[1985] ECR 3261, [1986] 2 CMLR 558, CMR 14246 5.2.3.4.2,5.2.2.5.2
xlvi TABLE OF CASES
TelialTelenorlSchibsted( VI}V ),21 May 1998, OJ 1999, C220/28, [1999] 4
CMLR 216, Merger Reporter B721bis, p 4186.25 13.2.2.1
Telia/Telenor (2001/98/EC, IV/M.1439), 13 October 1999, OJ 2001, L40/1,
[2001] CMLR 1226, [2001] CEC 2,283 13.2.2.1
Tepea BVv Commission (28/77), 20 June 1978, [1978] ECR 1391, [1978] 3
CMLR 392, CMR 8467 2.3.2
Tetra Laval BV v Commission (T 5/02), 25 October 2002, [2002] ECR II 4381,
[2002] 5 CMLR 1182; on appeal. Commission v. Tetra Laval BV.(C 3IO3)
15 February 2005, [2005] 1 1113 2.2.2.3,12.4.2,12.6.1, 12.7.2, 14.1.1
Tetra Pak /(88/501/EEC), 26 July 1988, OJ 1988, L272/27, [1990] 4 CMLR 47,
CMR 11015; on appeal Tetra Pak Rawing SA v Commission (T 51/89), 10
July 1990, [1990] ECR 11 309, [1991] 4 CMLR 334, [1990] 2 CEC 409 1.2,
3.1.2.1, 3.1.2.2, 5.1.1, 5.2.7.4, 5.3.3, 9.6,13.2.3
Tetra Pak II—Elopak Italia Sri v Tetra Pak (92/163/EEC), 24 July 1991, OJ
1991, L72/1, [1992] 4 CMLR 551, [1992] 1 CEC 2,145; on appeal Tetra Pak
Rousing SA v Commission (No 2) (T 83/91), 6 October 1994, [1994] ECR
11 755, [1997] 4 CMLR 726, [1995] 1 CEC 34 (CFI); Tetra Pak International
SA v EC Commission (C 333/94 P), 14 November 1996, [1996] ECR 1 5951,
[1997] 4 CMLR 662, [1997] CEC 186 (ECJ) 4.3.7,4.3.9,5.1.1, 5.2, 5.2.2.2,
5.2.3,5.2.3.1.1,5.2.3.4.3,5.2.3.4.4,5.2.3.5,5.2.2.5.2,5.2.6.2,
5.2.6.2.1,5.2.6.4,5.3.3,5.4,7.5.5,8.5,14.1.5.2,14.2.4
Tetra Pak International SAIAlfa Laval AB (91/535/EEC, IV/M.068), 19 July
1991, OJ 1991, L290/35, [1992] 4 CMLR M81, [1991] 2 CEC 2,203, Merger
Reporter B37, p 261 4.3.7
Thetford Corporation v Fiamma SpA (35/87), 30 June 1988, [1988] ECR 3585,
[1988] 3 CMLR 549, CMR 14497 5.2.5.5.3,10.4.2
Tierce Ladbroke v Commission (T 504/93), June 12 1997, [1997] ECR 11 923,
[1997] 5 CMLR 309, [1997] CEC 812; there are several cases of Ladbroke v
Commission: the appeal has been withdrawn 4.3.1.1, 5.2.5.3,10.4.1
Transocean Marine Paint—Re the Transocean Marine Paint Association (No 1)
(67/454/EEC), 27 June 1967, JO 1967, L163/10, [1967] CMLR D9 .. . . 7.5.2, 8.6.1
Transocean Marine Paint II—Transocean Marine Paint Association v
Commission (17/74), 23 October 1974, [1974] ECR 1063, [1974] 2 CMLR
459, CMR 8241 7.5.2
Trefileurope Sales SARL v Commission (T 141/89), 6 April 1995, [1995] ECR
H 791 13.8.3
UIP~Re the Application of United International Pictures SF(89/467/EEC),
12 July 1989, OJ 1989, L226/25, [1990] 4 CMLR 749, [1989] 2 CEC 2,019 . . 8.2.3,
13.2.5
UIP II, OJ 1999, C205/6, [1999] 5 CMLR 732 8.2.4
United Brands Company (Re) (76/353/EEC), 17 December 1975, OJ 1976,
L95/1, [1976] 1 CMLR D28, CMR 9800; on appeal United Brands
Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission (27/76), 14
February 1978, [1978] ECR 207, [1978] 1 CMLR 429, CMR 8429.. .. 1.3.3.1,4.3,
4.3.1.1,4.3.1.2,4.3.4,4.3.4.1.1,4.3.4.3,5.1,5.1.1,5.2.4.3,5.3.1,5.4,5.6,7.4.1
United Kingdom Agricultural Tractor Registration Exchange (92/157/EEC), 17
February 1992, OJ 1992, L68/19, [1993] 4 CMLR 358, [1992] 1 CEC 2,126;
appeal, see Deere (John) 8.2.2
TABLE OF CASES xlvii
Vaessen BVv Moris and Alex Moris Pvba (79/86/EEC), 10 January 1979, OJ
1979, L19/32, [1979] 1 CMLR 511, CMR 10107 5.2.3.1.2, 8.5
VAG France SA v Etablissements Magne SA (10/86), 18 December 1986, [1986]
ECR 4071, [1988] 4 CMLR 98, CMR 14,390 3.1.2.3
Van den Bergh Foods Ltd (98/531/EC, IV/34.073), 11 March 1998, OJ 1998,
L246/1, [1998] 5 CMLR 530, [1998] CEC 2,380 ; on appeal Van den
Bergh Foods Ltd v Commission (T 65/98), 23 October 2003, [2003] ECR
11 4653, [2004] 4 CMLR 14, appeal to ECJ, Unilever Bestfoods (Ireland)
Ltd. C 552/03 P, 28 September 2006 . . . 5.2.2.1.3, 5.2.2.4, 5.2.7.1, 9.1.2, 9.7, 7.3.4,
14.1.5.4
Van Doren Q GmbH v Lifestyle Sportswear Handelsgesellschaft mbH
(C 244/00), April 8, 2003, [2003] ECR 1 3051, [2003] 2 CMLR 203,
(Competition Law Insight, part 6, onus on party relying on exhaustion
unless real risk of market partitioning) 10.6
Van Eycke Pascal v ASPA NV(2( 1IU), 21 September 1988, [1988] ECR 4769,
[1990] 4 CMLR 330, [1990] 1 CEC 293 6.1.4
Van Schijndel v Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysotherapeuten (C 430 431/93),
14 December 1995, [1995] ECR 1 4705, [1996] 1 CMLR 801, [1996] CEC
240 7.2
Van Zuylen Freres v Hag AG (192/73), 3 July 1974, [1974] ECR 731, [1974] 2
CMLR 127, CMR 8230 10.4.4
Vegetable Parchment—The Community v Members of the Genuine Vegetable
Parchment Association (78/252/EEC), 23 December 1977, OJ 1978, L70/54,
[1978] 1 CMLR 534, CMR 10016 8.2.2
Velcro SA v Aplix SA (85/410/EEC), 12 July 1985, OJ 1985, L233/22, [1985] 4
CMLR 157, CMR 10719 11.1,14.1.2
Verband der Sachversicherer v Commission—see Fire Insurance.
Vereeniging van Cementhandelaren v Commission (8/72), 17 October 1972,
[1972] ECR 977, [1973] CMLR 7, CMR 8179 2.2.3, 2.3.2
Vichy (91/153/EEC, IV/31.624), 11 January 1991, OJ 1991, L75/57; appeal
Societe d Hygiene de Vichy v Commission (T 19/91), order of the CFI
regarding application for interim measures, 7 June 1991, [1991] ECR
11 265, [1994] 1 CEC 318, judgment, 27 February 1992, [1992] ECR 11 415 ... 9.4,
14.1.2
Viho v Commission (C 73/95 P), 24 October 1996, [1996] ECR 1 5457, [1997] 4
CMLR 419 2.2.1.1
Villeroy Boch KG and Villeroy Boch Sari (Re the Agreements of)
(85/616/EEC), 16 December 1985, OJ 1985, L376/15, [1988] 4 CMLR 461,
CMR 10758 9.4
Virgin!British Airways—see British Airways.
VISA (COMP/D1/29.373), 14 October 2000, OJ 2000, C293/18, [2000] 5
CMLR 1067. (Article 19(3) notice) 1.3.3.2.4
Vitamins—see Hoffmann La Roche.
Vlaamse Reisburos—see Belgian Travel Agents.
Volk v Ets Vervaecke Spr/(5/69), 9 July 1969, [1969] ECR 295, [1969] CMLR
273, CMR 8074 2.4.6, 8.6
Volkswagen (98/273/EC, IV/35.733), 28 January 1998, OJ 1998, L124/60, [1998]
5 CMLR 33, [1998] CEC 2,189; on appeal Volkswagen v Commission
xlviii TABLE OF CASES
(T 62/98), 6 July 2000, [2000] ECR 11 2707, [2000] 5 CMLR 853; in ECJ
(C 338/OO P), 18 September 2003, [2003] ECR I 9189, [2004] 4 CMLR 351,
para 60 69 on unilateral act L7, 2.2.2.2
Volkswagen Passat (2001/71 I/EC, COMP/F 2/36.693), 29 June 2001, OJ 2001,
L 262/14, [2001] 5 CMLR 1309, [2001] CEC 2,726; on appeal Volkswagen
AG v Commission (T 208/01), 3 December 2003, [2003] ECR 11 5141. [2004]
4 CMLR 727; on appeal C 74/04 P, 13 July 2006, [[2006] ECR I 6585 .... 2.2.2.2
Volvo AB v Erik Veng ( UK) Ltd (238/87), 5 October 1988, [1988] ECR 6211,
[1989] 4 CMLR 122, CMR 14498 5.2.5.1, 5.2.5.5.2
WANADOO (COMP 38.233), 16 July 2003, Press Release IP/03/1025, [2005] 5
CMLR 120; on appeal by Wanadoo (T 340/03), 2 October 2003, OJ 2003,
C289/34, 30 January 2007, Appeal lodged, (C 202/07). Michal Gal,
Below Cost Price Alignment: Meeting or Beating Competition, The
France Telecom Case, [2007] ECLR 382.
France v. Commission C289/34,... 5.2.6, 5.2.6.2.1, 5.2.6.4, 5.6, 12.4.3,14.1.5.2,14.2.4
WANO Schwarzpulver GmbH (Re) (78/92I/EEC), 20 October 1978, OJ 1978,
L322/26, [1979] 1 CMLR 403, CMR 10089 8.6.1, 13.2.2
Warner Bros and Metronome v Christiansen (158/86), 17 May 1988, [1988]
ECR 2605, CMR 14497 10.4.2
Whitbread (99/230/EC, IV/35.079/F3), 24 February 1999, OJ 1999, L88/26,
[1999] 5 CMLR 118; appeal Shaw and Falla v Commission (T 131/99), 21
March 2002, [2002] ECR 11 2023, [2002] 5 CMLR 81 2.4.4.7
White Lead—The Community v Associated Lead Manufacturers Ltd
(79/90/EEC), 12 December 1978, OJ 1979, L21/16, [1979] 1 CMLR 464,
CMR 10111 8.2.5
Wilhelm (Walt) v Bundeskartellamt (14/68), 13 February 1969, [1969] ECR 1,
[1969] CMLR 100, CMR 8056 2.3.1, 6.1.3
Windsurfing International Inc v Commission (193/83), 25 February 1986, [1986]
ECR 611, [1986] 3 CMLR 489, CMR 14271; appeal from Commission
decision Windsurfing International (%31400/EEC, IV/29.395), 11 July 1983,
OJ 1983, L229/1, [1984] 1 CMLR 1 2.3.3, 2.4.4.2.1
Wood Pulp (Re) (85/202/EEC), 19 December 1984, OJ 1985, L85/1, [1985] 3
CMLR 474, CMR 10654.
Wood Pulp—A Ahlstrom OY and Others v Commission (C 89, 104, 114, 116,
117 125 129/85), judgment on extraterritoriality, 2 7 September 1988,
[1988] ECR 5193, [1988] 4 CMLR 901, CMR 11026, [1989] 4 CMLR 22,
CMR 14491; judgment on concerted practices, 31 March 1993, [1993] ECR
1 1307, [1993] 4 CMLR 407, [1993] 1 CEC 466 1.6, 1.6.1, 2.2.4.2, 4.3.1.2
WorldCom/MCI (99/2S1/EC, IV/M.1069), 8 July 1998, OJ 1999, LI 16/1, [1999]
5 CMLR 876, [1999] CEC 2,440 12.2.5
Wouters, Sarelbergh and Price Waterhouse v Algemene Raad Van de
Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten (C 309/99), 19 February 2002, [2002] ECR
1 1577, [2002] 4 CMLR 913, [2002] CEC 250 1.3.2.7, 2.2.1.2.3, 2.4.3, 2.4.4.3,
6.1.4, 6.2.1.4,13.2.1.3.2,14.1.2.1
Yves Saint Laurent—see Parfums Yves Saint Laurent.
Zanussi—Re the Guarantee Given by Industrie A Zanussi SpA (78/922/EEC), 23
October 1978, OJ 1978, L322/26, [1979] 1 CMLR 81, CMR 10090 8.6.1
Zuchner (172/80), 14 July 1981, [1981] ECR 2021, [1982] 1 CMLR 313 2.3.3
1
TABLE OF CASES il
II. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Stenuit v France (A/232) (1992) 14 EHRR 509 7.5.1
Franz Fischer v Austria, 29 May 2001, application No 37950/97, EctHR 7.3.3
III. AUSTRALIA
Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Pty Ltd (1988) 83 ALR 577,
comment Korah (2000) 32 Victoria University of Wellington Law Rev 231,
233 etseq, Hanks Williams (1990) 17 Melbourne ULR 437 5.2.5.2
IV. FRANCE
Consten Grundig, [1963] CMLR 176 2.4.1
SACEM, Conseil de la Concurrence (France), Avis 93 A 05, 20 April 1993 5.3.1
V. GERMANY
Hoffmann La Roche, WuW/E (BGH) 1445 (1976) 5.3.1
Vitamin B12, WuW/E (BGH) 1435 (1976) 5.3.1
VI. IRELAND
Masterfoods v HB Ice Cream, [1992] 3 CMLR 830 7.3.4
VII. UNITED KINGDOM
Better Care, [2002] Comp AR 226 2.2.1.2.2
Chemidus Wavin Ltd v Soc pour la Transformation et I Exploitation des Resines
lndustrielles SA, [1977] FSR 181, [1978] 3 CMLR 514.
Cigarette Filter Rods, Report of Monopolies Commission on the Supply and
Export of, 23 July 1969, H.C.P. 335 4.3.4.1.2
Colgate Palmolive Ltd. v Markwell Finance, [1988] R.P.C. 283 (Ch.D.), [1989]
R.P.C. 497 (C.A.).
Concrete Roofing Tiles, Report of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission
on the Supply in the United Kingdom of, 1981, H.C. 120. Courage v Crehan
No 1, [1999] ECC 455, [1999] UKCLR 110, 1999 WL 477317 5.2.6
Courage v Crehan No 2, [1999] UKCLR 407, 1999 WL 1071341 7.2
Garden Cottage Foods v Milk Marketing Board, [1984] AC 130, [1983] 3 WLR
143, [1983] 2 All ER 770, [1983] 3 CMLR 43, reversing [1982] QB 1114
(CA) 7.2
Gibbs Mew Pic v. Graham Gemmell, July 22 1988, Q.Ben I, 98/0096/1. CA.
[1999] ECC 97, [1998] EuLR 588, 606(see Courage v Crehan, C 453/99) 7.3.4
Holleran v Thwaites, [1989] 2 CMLR 917, see E.C.C.
Iberian v BHP, [1996] 2 CMLR 601 (Ch.D.), Laddie J 7.3.4
1 TABLE OF CASES
Levi Strauss v Tesco, UK High Court, Chancery Division, Pumfrey J, Pumfrey
J., 31 July 2002, [2002] 3 CMLR 281.
Metal Containers, Report of the Monopolies Commission on the Supply of,
1970, H.C.P 6.
Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited Subsidiairies v Director General oj Fair
Trading, 15 Jan 2002, [2002] UKCLR 726, [2002] 4 All ER 376, 2002 WL
820135 4.3.9
Westinghouse Electric Corp Uranium Contract Litigation (In Re), MDL
Docket 235, [1978] AC 547, [1978] 1 CMLR 100 (H.L.) 1 5.2
VII. UNITED STATES
Brook Group Ltd v Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp, 409 US 209, 125 L Ed
2d 168, 113 SCt 2578 (1993) 5.2.6.2.1
Brunswick Corp v Pueblo Bowl O Mat, 429 US 477, 97 SCt 690, 50 L Ed 2d
701 7.3.4
Cellophane—US v El du Pont De Nemours Co, 351 US 377 (1956), 100 L Ed
1264, 76 SCt 994 4.3.2
Continental TV Inc v GTE Sylvania Inc, 433 US 36, 53 L Ed 2d 568, 97 SCt
2549, (1977); on remand to Californian CA, 694 F 2d 1132 (1982), 1982 2
Trade Cas (CCH) P64, 962 8.1.3
Eastman Kodak Co v Image Technical Services Inc, 504 US 451, 119 L Ed 2d
265,112 SCt 2072 (1992) 4.3.3
Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist No 2 v Hyde, 466 US 2, 104 SCt 1551, 80 L Ed
2d 2 (1984) 5.2.3.5
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co v Zenith Radio Corporation, 475 US 574, 89
L Ed 2d 538,106 SCt 1348 (1986) 5.2.6.2.1
Monsanto v Spray Rite Service Corp, 465 US 752, 79 L Ed 2d 775£ 104 SCt
1464 (1984) 2.2.2.2
Professional Real Estate Investors v Columbia Pictures Industries, 508 US 49,
123 L Ed 2d 611, 113 SCt 1920 (1993), litigation started in good faith not
monopolization 5.2.7.2
Rothery Storage Van Co v Atlas Van Lines, Inc, 792 F.2d 210 (DC Cir 1986) . . 8.1.3
US v Addyston Pipe Steel Co, 85 F 271 (CA 6th Cir 1898) 8.1.1
US v Penn Olin Chemical Co, 378 US 158, 12 L Ed 2d 775, 84 SCt 1710, 775
(1964) 13.2.1
US v Topco Association Inc, 405 US 596, 131 L Ed 2d 515, 92 SCt 1126 (1972). . 8.1.3
|
| adam_txt |
Contents
Foreword to the Fourth Edition v
Foreword to the Seventh Edition vii
Preface ix
Table of Cases xxvii
Table of Legislation li
1 Introduction 1
1.1 The Common Market 2
1.2 The competition rules 3
1.2.1 Article 81—collusion that restricts competition 4
1.2.2 Article 82—the abuse of a dominant position 5
1.2.3 Regulation 4064/89—the control of concentrations 7
1.2.4 Interpretation of the competition rules and the
integration of the Common Market 8
1.2.5 The treaty covers all sectors of the economy 9
1.3 Economics of market power 10
1.3.1 Welfare economics—efficiency 11
1.3.2 Other reasons for controlling market power 13
1.3.2.1 Market integration 13
1.3.2.2 Fair competition 14
1.3.2.3 Small and medium sized firms 14
1.3.2.4 Political freedom 15
1.3.2.5 Workable competition 15
1.3.2.6 Cultural, environmental and social policy 15
1.3.2.7 Objectives of national law 16
1.3.2.8 Conflict of goals 16
1.3.3 Barriers to entry and substitutes may define the relevant
market 19
1.3.3.1 Substitutes on the demand side 19
1.3.3.2 Barriers to entry 20
1.3.3.2.1 Minimum efficient scale 21
1.3.3.2.2 Contestable markets 22
1.3.3.2.3 Network markets 22
1.3.3.2.4 Two sided markets 23
1.3.3.2.5 Government regulation 23
1.3.3.2.6 Intellectual property rights (iprs) 24
1.3.3.2.6.1 Free riders 24
1.4 Institutions of the EC 26
xiv CONTENTS
1.4.1 The Council 26
1.4.2 The Commission—the executive of the Communities 26
1.4.3 Community courts 27
1.4.3.1 Membership of EC courts 28
1.4.3.2 The jurisdiction of CFIandECJ 30
1.5 Enforcement of the competition rules 32
1.5.1 Regulation 1/2003 32
1.5.2 Enforcement by national courts 33
1.5.3 Enforcement by national authorities 34
1.5.4 Enforcement by the Commission 34
1.6 Extraterritorial competence 35
1.6.1 Free Trade Agreements 36
1.6.2 European Economic Area 37
1.7 The importance of the competition rules 37
1.8 Plan for the book 40
1.9 Bibliography 41
2 Analysis of Article 81(1) 43
2.1 Introduction 44
2.2 Collusion between undertakings 45
2.2.1 Undertakings 45
2.2.1.1 Entities 46
2.2.1.2 Economic activities 47
2.2.1.2.1 Social security 48
2.2.1.2.2 Buying is not an economic activity 49
2.2.1.2.3 Other criteria 49
2.2.2 Agreements 51
2.2.2.1 Unsigned agreements that are acted on 51
2.2.2.2 Unilateral conduct in the context of a long term
contract with selected distributors 52
2.2.2.3 Tenuous evidence on which collusion is sometimes
found 56
2.2.3 'Decisions by associations of undertakings' 57
2.2.4 Concerted practices 58
2.2.4.1 Economic considerations 58
2.2.4.2 Legal precedents 61
2.2.4.3 Agreements to exchange information 65
2.3 'Which may affect trade between Member States' 66
2.3.1 Market integration 66
2.3.2 Condition often fulfilled even if agreement is confined to a
single Member State 69
2.3.3 The condition has been further narrowed 72
CONTENTS xv
2.3.4 Commission's notice on effect on trade 72
2.3.5 The comparable provision in Article 82 is similarly
construed 72
2.3.6 The EEA 73
2.4 'Have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or
distortion of competition within the Common Market' 73
2.4.1 Consten and Grundig 75
2.4.2 Restrictions by object 76
2.4.3 Restriction by effect—Technique Miniere 77
2.4.4 Legal and economic context—Delimitis 78
2.4.4.1 Market definition 79
2.4.4.2 Counterfactual—Technique Miniere 80
2.4.4.2.1 Ancillary restraints 80
2.4.4.3 The principle in Wouters 83
2.4.4.4 Workable competition 84
2.4.4.5 National public interest 85
2.4.4.6 Are all these exceptions to Article 81(1) part
of the same principle? 86
2.4.4.7 The Commission's view 86
2.4.5 De facto restrictions 88
2.4.6 Appreciable' effects 88
2.5 Nullity 91
2.6 Bibliography 91
3 Analysis of Article 81(3) 93
3.1 Article 81(3) 93
3.1.1 Individual exceptions 95
3.1.1.1 Right of complainant to appeal against a
clearance 96
3.1.2 Group exemptions 97
3.1.2.1 Withdrawal of group exemptions 98
3.1.2.2 No exemption from Article 82 98
3.1.2.3 Advantages and disadvantages of
group exemptions 99
3.1.2.4 Effect of group exemption on national
competition law 100
3.2 Bibliography 100
4 Dominant Position 101
4.1 Introduction 101
xvi CONTENTS
4.2 Objections to economic strength 102
4.2.1 Power over price 102
4.2.2 Ordo liberal influence 103
4.2.3 Discussion paper (dp) 104
4.3 Undertakings in a dominant position 105
4.3.1 Market definition 106
4.3.1.1 Relevant product market 107
4.3.1.2 Relevant geographic market 111
4.3.1.3 Previous definitions not binding 114
4.3.1.4 Time scale 114
4.3.1.5 Wider markets suggested by the ECJ 115
4.3.1.6 The fallacy of defining markets to assess
market power 115
4.3.2 Exclusive rights granted by government 116
4.3.3 Customer dependence 117
4.3.4 Appraisal of dominant position 119
4.3.4.1 Factors found relevant by the Commission
and courts 119
4.3.4.1.1 Entry barriers 119
4.3.4.1.2 Market shares 121
4.3.4.3 Conduct 123
4.3.5 Collective dominance 124
4.3.6 'Substantial part of the Common Market' 127
4.3.7 Abuse in linked market 128
4.3.8 Special responsibility of dominant firms not to abuse 129
4.3.9 Super dominant position 130
4.3.10 Conclusion I30
4.4 Bibliography 132
5 Abusive Exploitation 133
5.1 Introduction 134
5.1.1 Exclusionary abuses 13'
5.1.2 Commission's staff discussion paper 142
5.2 Reduction of competition prohibited by Article 82—Continental
Can 144
5.2.1 Control of mergers 146
5.2.2 Discrimination—Ramsey pricing 14°
5.2.2.1 Single branding to exclude competitors of the
dominant firm 148
5.2.2.1.1 Suiker Unie I49
5.2.2.1.2 Hoffmann La Roche v Commission
{HLR) and Michelin I I49
CONTENTS xvii
5.2.2.1.3 Van den Bergh 151
5.2.2.1.4 Michelinll 154
5.2.2.1.5 British Airways 156
5.2.2.1.6 Retrospective rebates over long
period, etc 158
5.2.2.2 Discrimination against customers of
competitors downstream—Irish Sugar 158
5.2.2.3 Discrimination by firms enjoying special or
exclusive rights 159
5.2.2.4 Justifications 160
5.2.2.5 Conclusion on exclusionary rebates 162
5.2.3 Tying 163
5.2.3.1 Benefits and detriments of tying 165
5.2.3.1.1 Compatible consumables 165
5.2.3.1.2 Measuring usage 166
5.2.3.1.3 Full range of products 166
5.2.3.1.4 Economies of scope and
complementary products 166
5.2.3.1.5 Avoiding regulation 167
5.2.3.1.6 Excluding smaller firms 167
5.2.3.2 Cases 167
5.2.3.2.1 Hilti 167
5.2.3.2.2 Telemarketing 167
5.2.3.2.3 TetraPakll 168
5.2.3.2.4 Microsoft tying media player to
windows for PCs 169
5.2.3.3 Conclusion 171
5.2.4 Refusals to deal 172
5.2.4.1 Commercial Solvents 172
5.2.4.2 ABG 173
5.2.4.3 United Brands 174
5.2.4.4 Hugin 175
5.2.4.5 Sea and airports 175
5.2.5 Obligation to licence 175
5.2.5.1 Volvo 176
5.2.5.2 Magill 176
5.2.5.3 Tierce Ladbroke 178
5.2.5.4 Oscar Bronner 179
5.2.5.5 Other recent cases 180
5.2.5.5.1 Preliminary ruling in IMS 180
5.2.5.5.2 Syfait 182
5.2.5.5.3 Microsoft 185
5.2.5.5.3.1 Interoperability 186
5.2.5.5.3.2 Remedies 187
xviii CONTENTS
5.2.5.5.3.3 Standards 188
5.2.5.5.3.4 Comments 188
5.2.6 Predatory pricing 189
5.2.6.1 AKZO 192
5.2.6.2 Tetra Pak II 194
5.2.6.2.1 Recoupment 194
5.2.6.3 CEWAL—Compagnie Maritime Beige 195
5.2.6.4 Deutsche Post, Wanadoo and Deutsche Telecom 197
5.2.7 Other exclusionary conduct 198
5.2.7.1 Raising rivals'costs 198
5.2.7.2 Vexatious litigation 199
5.2.7.3 Price squeeze 200
5.2.7.4 Acquiring the only competing technology 200
5.3 Unfair competition 200
5.3.1 Unfair prices 200
5.3.2 Other unfair terms 203
5.3.3 Ad hoc discriminatory pricing 204
5.3.4 Refusal to deal 206
5.3.4.1 Refusals to deal based on nationality 206
5.4 Integration of the Common Market 207
5.5 That may affect trade between Member States 209
5.6 Conclusion 209
5.7 Bibliography 212
6 State Measures to Protect Firms from Competition 217
6.1 Introduction 218
6.1.1 Government encouragement or persuasion is no
defence to Article 81 219
6.1.2 State measures reinforcing the effects of
anti competitive agreements ZI7
6.1.3 State measures that delegate the fixing of prices to
citizens 220
6.1.4 Anti competitive state measures making agreements
between undertakings unnecessary 221
6.1.5 State measures are subject to the rules for free
movement of goods 224
6.1.6 Conclusion on Article 10 224
6.2 Special and exclusive rights (Article 86) 225
6.2.1 Undertakings 226
6.2.1.1 Criterion functional—economic activity 226
6.2.1.2 Social solidarity 226
6.2.1.3 Supplying goods or services on the market 228
CONTENTS xix
6.2.1.4 Regulation 228
6.2.2 Unable to avoid infringing 229
6.2.3 Mere exercise of exclusive right infringes 229
6.2.4 Extension of market power to another activity 231
6.2.5 Derogation under Article 86(2) 231
6.3 Undertakings infringe only by autonomous conduct 232
6.4 Where national law requires an infringement, a national court
or competition authority should disapply the law—Consorzio
Fiammiferi 233
6.5 State monopolies of a commercial character (Article 31) 235
6.6 State aids (Articles 87 89) 236
6.7 Anti dumping duties 237
6.8 Conflict between competition rules and other Community
policies 238
6.8.1 Free movement and intellectual property 238
6.8.2 Social policy and competition 238
6.8.3 The environment and competition 239
6.8.4 Other Community policies and competition 240
6.9 Conclusion 240
6.10 Bibliography 240
7 Enforcement after Regulation 1/2003 241
7.1 Introduction 241
7.2 Articles 81 and 82 are directly applicable in national courts
and authorities 243
7.3 Community powers of NCAs, Commission and national courts 245
7.3.1 National powers of NCAs and courts—Article 3 245
7.3.2 Community law powers of NCAs and Commission—
Articles 5 and 7 10 246
7.3.3 Co operation between competition authorities—
Articles 12 14 249
7.3.4 Powers of national courts 251
7.3.4.1 Nullity 255
7.3.4.2 Effect of comfort letters 256
7.3.4.3 Assistance from the Commission 257
7.3.4.4 Forum shopping 258
7.4 The Commission's powers to obtain information 258
7.4.1 Requests for information (Art 18 and recital 23) 259
7.4.2 Inspections (Arts 19 21) 261
7.4.3 Sector enquiries (Art 17) 265
7.4.4 Confidentiality (Arts 12 and 28) 265
7.5 The Commission's Procedure (Art 27) 268
xx CONTENTS
7.5.1 Rights of the defence 269
7.5.2 Statement of objections and hearing 271
7.5.3 Access to the file 273
7.5.4 Subsequent steps 275
7.5.5 Appeals 275
7.6 Fines and penalties (Arts 23 26) 277
7.6.1 Notice on the method of setting fines 278
7.6.2 Notice on the reduction of cartel fines 279
7.6.3 Limitation periods 281
7.7 Conclusion 282
7.8 Bibliography 283
8 Classes of Agreement Clearly Prohibited 287
8.1 Distinctions between hard core and ancillary restrictions of
competition and between horizontal and vertical agreements 287
8.1.1 Hard core restraints illegal per se 288
8.1.2 Ancillary restraints may be justified 288
8.1.3 Horizontal and vertical relationships 290
8.2 Hard core horizontal cartels affecting price and allocating
markets or customers 294
8.2.1 Indirect influences on pricing policies 296
8.2.2 Information agreements 297
8.2.3 Joint sales organisations 298
8.2.4 Agreements about standard conditions of sale 300
8.2.5 Market allocation 30°
8.2.6 Maximum buying prices 301
8.3 Collective discrimination—boycotts and reciprocal exclusive
dealing 301
8.4 Collective aggregated discounts 303
8.5 Agreements to tie the sale of one item to another 304
8.6 Export bans 305
8.6.1 Export deterrents 306
8.6.2 Export boosters 309
8.7 Conclusion 310
8.8 Bibliography 310
9 Distribution Agreements 311
9.1 Historical introduction 311
9.9.1 Exclusive distribution (I will sell only to you within a
territory) exempted, not cleared 311
CONTENTS xxi
9.1.2 Dealers tied to brand owners (single branding) 312
9.2 Former group exemptions for exclusive distribution and
exclusive purchasing agreements 314
9.3 Clearance of exclusive distribution agreements 314
9.4 Selective distribution—non price competition 315
9.5 Retail format franchising 318
9.5.1 The ECJ's judgment in Pronuptia 319
9.6 Group exemption for vertical agreements 320
9.6.1 The exemption (Art 2) 322
9.6.1.1 Vertical agreements 322
9.6.1.2 Two or more parties 323
9.6.1.3 Agreement between actual or
potential competitors 323
9.6.1.4 Subject to conditions 324
9.6.1.5 Other group exemptions 324
9.6.1.6 Intellectual property rights 325
9.6.2 No white list 325
9.6.3 30% ceiling of market share—(Art 3) 325
9.6.4 Hard core restraints (Art 4) 326
9.6.4.1 Resale price maintenance (Art 4(a)) 327
9.6.4.2 Territorial restraints (Art 4(b)) 327
9.6.4.3 Selective distribution (Art 4(c)) 329
9.6.4.4 Cross supplies (Art 4(d) 329
9.6.5 Single branding (Art 5) 329
9.6.6 Withdrawal of exemption (Arts 6 8) 330
9.6.7 Transitional provisions (Art 12) 331
9.7 Ways of bringing goods and services to market 331
9.7.1 Agency 332
9.7.2 Collective exclusive distribution 333
9.8 Conclusion 333
9.9 Bibliography 333
10 Intellectual Property Rights and the Free Movement of Goods 335
10.1 Intellectual property rights and competition 335
10.2 Birth of the distinction between the existence of rights and
their exercise 337
10.3 Free movement of goods 337
10.4 Exhaustion of intellectual property rights when a product has
been sold by or with the consent of the holder in another
Member State 338
10.4.1 Early cases on exhaustion 338
xxii CONTENTS
10.4.2 Copyright—the ECJ emphasises the need for rewards
and incentives 343
10.4.3 Law of unfair competition 346
10.4.4 Rights in reputation—trademarks 347
10.4.4.1 Repackaging and relabelling of trade marked
goods 348
10.4.5 Merck v Stephar remains the law 350
10.4.5.1 Can pharmaceutical patents be used to
restrain parallel trade? GlaxoSmithKline 351
10.4.6 Sales outside the EEA do not exhaust intellectual
property rights 352
10.4.6.1 Exhaustion applies to goods sold anywhere
in the EEA 353
10.5 Harmonisation of intellectual property rights 353
10.5.1 Copyright 354
10.5.2 Trademarks 355
10.5.3 Patents 355
10.5.3.1 Supplementary protection certificates 355
10.6 No international exhaustion of trade marks 356
10.7 Conclusion 359
10.8 Bibliography 360
11 Licences of Industrial and Commercial Property Rights 363
11.1 Introduction: rationale for the grant of patent protection 364
11.2 The Commission's view of exclusive licences 365
11.3 The Court's view of exclusive licences: Nungesser, Coditel II,
Louis Erauw Jacquerie 367
11.4 The former group exemptions for patent, know how and mixed
licences 371
11.5 The group exemption for technology transfer—
Regulation 772/04 371
11.5.1 The exemption—Article 2 372
11.5.2 Ceilings of market share—Article 3 373
11.5.2.1 'Competing undertakings'—Article l(l)(j) 374
11.5.3 Hard core restraints—Article 4(1) and (2) 375
11.5.3.1 As between competing undertakings—
Article 491 and Guidelines 77 95 376
11.5.3.1.1 Price fixing 376
11.5.3.1.2 Output limitation 376
11.5.3.1.3 Market allocation 376
11.5.3.1.4 Restriction on using others'
technology 376
CONTENTS xxiii
11.5.3.2 As between non competing undertakings 376
11.5.3.2.1 Price restrictions 377
11.5.3.2.2 Restrictions on passive sales 377
11.5.4 Provisions that are not exempt 379
11.5.5 Miscellaneous provisions 380
11.5.6 Conclusion on the regulation 381
11.6 Other guidelines 381
11.7 Licences of other kinds of commercial and industrial property
rights 383
11.8 The subcontracting notice 384
11.9 Collective licensing 385
11.10 Bibliography 386
12 Concentrations 389
12.1 Control under Article 81 and 82 389
12.2 The successive merger regulations 390
12.2.1 Mergers and acquisitions of sole control 391
12.2.2 Concentrative joint ventures 392
12.2.3 Thresholds 395
12.2.4 Notification 396
12.2.4.1 Referral to and from NCAs 397
12.2.5 Procedure 397
12.2.5.1 The Commission's power to obtain information 399
12.2.5.2 Fines 399
12.2.5.3 Miscellaneous 400
12.2.6 One stop control 400
12.3 Criteria for appraisal by the Commission 402
12.3.1 Collective dominant position (Gs 39 60) 404
12.3.2 Unilateral effects 406
12.4 Burden of proof 407
12.4.1 Airtours 407
12.4.2 Tetra Laval and other cases 408
12.4.3 IMP ALA 410
12.5 Horizontal mergers 411
12.5.1 Market shares 412
12.5.2 Other factors 413
12.5.3 Efficiencies 415
12.5.4 Failing firm 416
12.6 Vertical mergers 417
12.6.1 Draft guidelines 417
12.7 Conglomerate mergers 419
12.7.1 Draft guidelines 419
xxiv CONTENTS
12.7.2 Commission v Tetra Laval 419
12.7.3 GEIHoneywell 420
12.8 Remedies 422
12.9 Conclusion 423
12.10 Bibliography 425
13 Joint Ventures and Specialisation Agreements 427
13.1 Introduction 427
13.2 Case law on cooperative joint ventures 429
13.2.1 Inherent effect: loss of potential competition 430
13.2.1.1 Ancillary restrictions 431
13.2.1.2 The need for each party to appropriate the
benefits of its investment 432
13.2.1.3 More realistic attitude to be taken to
potential competition 433
13.2.1.3.1 ODIN 435
13.2.1.3.2 European Night Services and later
cases 436
13.2.2 The group effect—spillover 437
13.2.2.1 Spillover under the merger regulation 438
13.2.3 Foreclosure 438
13.2.4 Networks of joint ventures 43
13.2.5 Joint sales organisations 439
13.3 Disadvantages to industry of the Commission's refusal to clear
joint ventures 441
13.4 Guidelines on joint ventures 441
13.5 The group exemption for cooperative R D 442
13.6 Problems with standards 443
13.7 Conclusion on joint ventures 444
13.8 Specialisation agreements 445
13.8.1 Effects of specialisation agreements on competition 446
13.8.2 Individual decisions 446
13.8.3 Group exemption—Regulation 2658/2000 448
13.9 Bibliography 449
14 Conclusion 451
14.1 Criticisms 452
14.1.1 The paucity of economic analysis in the Commission's
and Courts' public decisions 452
CONTENTS xxv
14.1.2 The Commission's view that Article 81(1) prohibits any
restriction of conduct that is significant on the market 454
14.1.2.1 The Court's analysis has been more helpful
than that of the Commission 457
14.1.3 The need to analyse ex ante: at the time the
commitments are made—the counterfactual 458
14.1.4 Hostile attitude to export bans and deterrents 459
14.1.5 Article 82 is intended to protect consumers not
particular competitors 461
14.1.5.1 Duty to supply narrowed 462
14.1.5.2 Predation illegal only if recoupment 462
14.1.5.3 Discrimination forbidden very widely: is the
prohibition limited to Article 82 in
combination with Article 86? 463
14.1.5.4 Rebates after Michelin IIand British Air 464
14.1.5.5 Joint dominant position 464
14.2 Steps taken by the Commission to meet the criticisms 465
14.2.1 New group exemptions since 1999 465
14.2.2 Regulation 1/2003 466
14.2.3 Appointment of the Commission's Chief Economist—
peer review and reorganisation of the Directorate General
for Competition 468
14.2.4 Review of the Application of Article 82 469
14.2.5 Cartels and the Leniency Programme 472
14.2.6 Pressures caused by competition cases on the ECJ and
CFI 473
14.3 Conclusion 474
Main Bibliography 475
Glossary 481
Appendix I: Excerpts from the EC Treaty 493
Appendix II: Regulation 1/2003 497
Appendix III: Useful websites 529
Index 531
Table of Cases
I. THE EC COMMISSION AND COURTS
ABB—see Pre insulated Pipe Cartel.
ABG—Aardolie Belangen Gemeenschap BVv Esso NederlandBV
(77/327/EEC), 19 April 1977, OJ 1977, LI 17/1, [1977] 2 CMLR Dl, CMR
9944; appeal sub nom BP v Commission (11111), 29 June 1978, [1978] ECR
1513, [1978] 3 CMLR 174, CMR 8465 4.3.3,4.3.6, 5.2.4.2
ACF Chemiefarma NV v Commission (41/69), 15 July 1970, [1970] ECR 661,
CMR 8083, appeal from Quinine Cartel 2.2.2, 8.2, 8.2.5
Adalat (96/478/EEC), 10 January 1996, OJ 1996 L201/1, [1996] 5 CMLR 416,
[1996] CEC 2,421; appeal sub nom Bayer v Commission (T 41/96), 26
October 2000, [2000] ECR 11 3383, [2001] 4 CMLR 4 (CFI); Bundesverband
der Arzneimittel Importeure eVand Commission v Bayer (C 2 3/01 P), 6
January 2004, OJ 2004, C 59/2, [2004] 4 CMLR 653, [2004] All ER (EC)
500 (ECJ) 2.2.2.2,5.2.2.4, 8.6.1,10.7
AEG—Allgemeine Elektricitats Gesellschaft AEG Telefunken AG v
Commission (107/82), 25 October 1983, [1983] ECR 3151, [1984] 3 CMLR
325, CMR
14018 2.2.2.2, 9.4,11.1
Aeroports de Paris v Commission (T 128/98), 12 December 2000, [2001] 4
CMLR 1376, [2000] ECR 11 3929; appeal dismissed C 82/01 P, 24 October
2002, [2002] ECR 1 9297; [2003] 4 CMLR 609 6.2.1.4
Ahmed Saeed Flugreisen and Silver Line Reisebiiro GmbH v Zentrale zur
Bekampfung Unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV(66/86), 11 April 1989, [1989] ECR
803, [1990] 4 CMLR 102, [1989] 2 CEC 654 4.3.1.1, 4.3.1.5, 5.1.1, 7.2, 12.2.6
Air tours/First Choice (2000/276/EC, IV/M 1524), 22 September 1999, OJ 2000,
L93/1, [2000] 5 CMLR 494, [2000] CEC 2,203; appeal T 342/99, [2002]
ECR H 2585, [2002] 5 CMLR 317. Successor to Airtours claims damages
from Commission: My Travel v Commission (T 212/03), OJ 2003 C200/28.
CFI ruled that My Travel is entitled to some damages, but the exact
amount is still being determined 1.4.3.2, 2.2.2.3, 2.2.4.1,4.3.5, 7.5, 12.2.5,
12.3.1,12.3.2,12.4.1,12.4.3,12.9,14.1.1
AKZO—Engineering and Chemical Supplies (Epsom and Gloucester) Ltd v
AKZO Chemie UK Ltd (83/462/EEC), 29 July 1983, OJ 1983, L252/13,
[1983] 3 CMLR 694 (interim relief); final decision, 14 December 1985, OJ
1985, L374/1, [1986] 3 CMLR 273, CMR 10748; on appeal AKZO Chemie
BV v Commission (62/86), 3 July 1991, [1991] ECR 1 3359, [1993] 5 CMLR
215, [1993] 2 CEC 115 4.3.5, 5.1.1, 5.2.2.1.4,5.2.2.4,5.2.6.1,5.2.6.4,5.3.3
AKZO Chemie BV and AKZO Chemie UK Ltd v Commission (53/85),
judgment concerning confidentiality of documents, 24 June 1986, [1986]
ECR 1965, [1987] 3 CMLR 231, CMR 14318 1.5.3, 7.4.4
Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and Another v Commission (T 125 253/03 R), 30
October 2003, OJ 2004, C35/10, [2003] ECR 11 4771, [2004] 4 CMLR 744. 7.4.4
xxviii TABLE OF CASES
Albany—Albany International BV v Stichting, Bedrijfspensioenfonds
Textielindustrie and Others (C 67/96, C l 15,116,117 and 219/97), 21
September 1999, [1999] ECR1 5751, [2000] 4 CMLR 446 1.2.5,1.3.2.6,
2.2.1.2.3,2.4.4.5, 6.2.5, 6.8,6.8.2
AlcatellTelettra (91/252/EEC, IV/M.042), 12 April 1991, OJ 1991, L122/48,
[1991] 4 CMLR 778, [1991] 1 CEC 2,112, Merger Reporter B 18, p 113 . 4.3.1Q
Almelo (C 393/92), 13 April 1994, [1994] ECR 1 1477, [1994] 2 CEC 281 4.3.5
Alsatel v Novasam (247/86), 5 October 1988, [1988] ECR 5987, [1990] 4 CMLR
434, [1990] 1 CEC 248 4.3.1.5
Altmark Trans Gmbh, C 280/00, 24 July 2003, [2003] ECR 1 7747 6.6
AM S Europe Ltd v Commission (155/79), 4 February 1981, [1982] ECR
1575, [1982] 2 CMLR 264, CMR 8757 7.4.4
Anic Partecipazioni, Commission v (C 49/92 P), [1999] ECR 1 4125, [2001] 4
CMLR 602 2.2.2.1
Anseau—Association Nationale des Services d'Eau (Anseau Navewa)
(82/371/EEC), 17 December 1981, OJ 1982, L167/39, [1982] 2 CMLR 193,
CMR 10368; on appeal NVIAZ International Belgium and Others v
Commission (96 102, 104, 105, 108 110/82), 8 November 1983, [1983]
ECR 3369, [1984 3 CMLR 276, CMR 14023 2.2.1.2.3, 2.4
AOIP—Association des Ouvriers en Instruments de Precision v Beyrard
(76/29/EEC), 2 December 1975, OJ 1976, L6/8, [1976] 1 CMLR D14, CMR
9801 11.2
AOK and Others v Ichthyl Gesellsschaft Cordes and Others (C 264, 306, 354
355/01), 16 March 2004, [2004] ECR I 2493, [2004] 4 CMLR 22 . 1.3.2.6, 5.3.2,
6.2.1.2,6.2.5
APB (90/33/EEC), 14 December 1989, OJ 1990, L18/35, [1990] 4 CMLR 176,
[1990] 1 CEC 2,060; subsequent action of Commission, Press Release
IP/00/16, 11 Jan 2000 8.3,14.1.2
Arduino v Compagnia Assicuratrice RAS Spa (C 35/99), 19 February 2002,
[2002] ECR 1 1529; [2002] 4 CMLR 866 6.1.4
Arge Bat, ZVEI and HDE (Art 19(3) notice), OJ 1998, C172/13, [1999] 4
CMLR 526 1.3.2.6
Arjoumari Priouxl Wiggins Teape Appleton Pic (IV/M.025), 10 December 1990,
OJ 1990, C321, [1991] 4 CMLR 854, Merger Reporter B4, p 23 2.2.1.1,12.2.1
Atlantic Container Line and Others (T 191 and 212 214/98), 30 Sept 2003,
[2003] ECR 11 3275; on appeal, OJ 2004, Cl 18/45 4.3.1.1,4.3.4.3. 4.3.5
An Ble Vert—see Leclerc
Austin RoverlUnipart Re the Agreement between Austin Rover Group Ltd. and
Unipart Group Ltd. (88/84/EEC), 22 December 1987, OJ 1988, L45/34,
[1988] 4 CMLR 513, CMR 10968 ' 2.2.1.1
BA pic. V. Commission, 1 219/99, December 17, 2003, [2003] ECR II 5917,
[2014] 4 CMLR 1008, C 95/04P, opinion 23.02.06 5.2.2,5.2.2.L5,5.2.2.1.6,
5.2.2.4,5.2.3.4.4, 5.2.2.5.2, 5.2.7,5.3.2,5.3.3,14.1.5.4,14.2.4
B I/Sea Link—see Sea Link
Bagnasco (Carlo) and Others v Banca Popolare di Novara Soc Coop art, and v
Cassa diRisparmio digenova e Imperia SpA (C 215 216/96), 21 Jan 1999
[1999] ECR 1 135, [1999] 4 CMLR 624, [1999] CEC 601 2.3.2
TABLE OF CASES xxix
Banks (HJ) Co v British Coal Corporation (C 128/92), 13 April 1994, [1994]
ECR 1 1209, [1994] 5 CMLR 30 1.2.5
BASF v Commission (T 4/89), 17 December 1991, OJ 1992, C22/11, [1991]
ECR 11 1523; application for revision dismissed, 26 March 1992, [1992]
ECR 11 1591 2.2.2.3
BAT Cigaretten Fabriken GmbH v Commission (35/83), 30 January 1985, [1985]
ECR 363, [1985] CMLR 470, CMR 14166, appeal from ToltecslDorcet
(82/897/EEC), 15 December 1982, OJ 1982, L379/19, [1983] 1 CMLR 412,
CMR 10459, BAT and Reynolds v Commission (142 156/84), 17
November 1987, [1987] ECR 4487, [1988] 4 CMLR 24, CMR 14405, appeal
from Phillip Morris 12.1, 12.2.6
Bayer v Commission (T 41/96), 26 October 2000, [2000] ECR II 3383, [2001] 4
CMLR 126; appeal to ECJ sub nom Bundesverband der
Arzneimittel Importeure eV and Commission v Bayer (C 2 3/01 P); 6
January 2004, [2004] ECR 1 23, [2004] 4 CMLR 653. Appeal from
Adalat—see Adalat
Bayer/Gist Brocades—Re the Agreement between Bayer AG and GistBrocades
/VF(76/172/EEC), 15 December 1975, OJ 1976, L30/13, [1976] 1 CMLR
D98, CMR 9814 4.3.1.2
BBC Brown Boveri—Re the Agreements between BBC Brown Boveri and NGK
Insulators Lf /(88/54/EEC), 11 October 1988, OJ 1988, L301/68, [1989] 4
CMLR 610,[1989] 1 CEC 2,234 13.2.1.3
Becu and Others, Public Prosecutor v (C 22/98), 16 September 1999, [1999]
ECR 1 5665, [2001] 4 CMLR 968 2.2.1.2.3
Beecham v Europharm of Worthing Ltd (C 267 268/95) —see Merck Co
Inc v Primecrown 10.4.1, 10.4.5
Beguelin Import Co v GL Import Export SA (22/71), 25 November 1971, [1971]
ECR 949, [1972] CMLR 81, CMR 8149 10.4.3
Belasco (Societe Cooperative des Asphalteurs Beiges) v Commission (246/86),
11 July 1989, [1989] ECR 2117, [1991] 4 CMLR 96, [1990] 2 CEC
912 2.2.3, 2.3.2
Belgian Travel Agents— Vereniging van Vlaamse Reisbureaus v Sociale Dienst
van de Plaatselijke en Gewestelijke Overheidsdiensten (311/85), 1 October
1987, [1987] ECR 3801, [1989] 4 CMLR 213, CMR 14499 6.1.2,6.1.4,9.7.1
Beguelin Import Co. v S.A.G.L. Import Export (22/71), 25 November 1971,
[1971] ECR 949, [1972] CMLR 81 10.4.3
Benzine en Petroleum—see AEG.
Binon et Cie SA v SA Agence et Messageries de la Presse (243/83), 3 July 1985,
[1985] ECR 2015, [1985] 3 CMLR 800, CMR 14218 9.4
BMW Belgium SA v Commission (32 36 82/78), 12 July 1979, [1979] ECR
2435, [1980] 1 CMLR 370, CMR 8548 2.2.1.1,8.6.1
BNIC (Bureau National Interprofessionneldu Cognac) v Yves Aubert (136/86),
3 December 1987, [1987] ECR 4789, [1988] 4 CMLR 331,
[1989] 1 CEC 363 6.1.2, 6.1.4
BNIC (Bureau National Interprofessionnel du Cognac) v Guy Clair (123/83), 30
January 1985, [1985] ECR 391, [1985] 2 CMLR 430, CMR 14160 2.2.3, 2.3.1,
6.1.1,6.1.4
xxx TABLE OF CASES
Bodson v Pompes Funebres des Regions Liberees SA (30/87), 4 May 1988,
[1988] ECR 2479, [1989] 4 CMLR 984, [1990] 1 CEC 3 2.2.1.2.3, 5.1.1, 5.3.1
Boeringer Ingelheim v Swingward (C 143/00), 23 April 2002, [2002] ECR
1 3762, [2002] 2 CMLR 623, [2002] CEC 378 10.4.4.1
Boosey Hawkes—BBIIBoosey Hawkes (interim measures) (87/5OO/EEC),
29 July 1987, OJ 1987, L286/36, [1988] 4 CMLR 67, CMR 10920 5.2.7.2
Bosch—see de Geus.
Boussoisllnterpane—Re the Agreement between Boussois SA and
Interpane Entwicklungs und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH Co KG
(87/123/EEC), 15 December 1986, OJ 1987, L5O/3O, [1988] 4 CMLR 124,
CMR 10859 I1 3
BPIKellogg—Re the Application of BP International Ltd and the MW Kellogg
Company (85/560/EEC), 2 December 1985, OJ 1985, L369/6, [1986] 2
CMLR 619, CMR 10747 13.2.1,13.2.1.3,14.1.2
BP Kemi—Atka AIS v BP Kemi AIS and AIS de Danske Spritfabrikker
(79/934/EEC), 5 September 1979, OJ 1979, L286/32, [1979] 3 CMLR 684,
CMR 10165 2.2.2.1
BP v Commission—see ABG.
Brasserie de Haecht SA v Wilkin (23/67), 12 December 1967, [1967] ECR 407,
[1968] CMLR26, CMR 8053 5.2.2.1.3
Bristol Myers Squibb Ors v Paranova AIS (C 427,429 436/93),
11 July 1996, [1996] ECR 1 3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151,
[1996] 1 CEC 716 10.4.4.1,10.5.1
British Airways (2000/74/EC), 14 July 1999, OJ 2000, L30/1,
[2000] 4 CMLR 999, [2000] CEC 2,145; appeal (T 219/99), 17 Dec 2003,
[2004] 4 CMLR 1008; appeal to ECJ, C 95/04 P, OJ 2004, C106/22 4.3,5.2.2,
5.2.2.1.5,53.2,5.3.3
British Plasterboard—Iberian Trading UK Ltd v BPB Industries pic
(89/22/EEC), 5 December 1988, OJ 1989, L10/50, [1990] 4 CMLR 464,
[1989] 1 CEC 2,008; on appeal to CFI BPB Industries pic and British
Gypsum Limited v Commission (T 65/89), 1 April 1993, [1993] ECR 11 389,
[1993] 5 CMLR 32, [1993] 1 CEC 713;on appeal to ECJ (C 310/93 P),
6 April 1995, [1995] ECR 1 865, [1997] 4 CMLR 238,
[1995] 2 CEC 15 4.3.1.1, 5.1.1, 5.2.2.1.4
British Sugar and Others (1999/210/EC), OJ 1999, L 76/1, [1999] 4 CMLR
1316; on appeal to CFI Tate Lyle and Others v Commission (T 202/98,
T 204/98 and 207/98), 12 July 2001, [2001] ECR 11 2035; on appeal to ECJ
British Sugar and Others (C 359/01 P), 29 April 2004, OJ 2004, Cl 18/13,
[2004] 5 CMLR 329 ' 1.7
Bronbemaling—Zuid Nederlandsche Bronbemaling en Grondboringen B V v
Heidemaatschappij Beheer AT(75/570/EEC), 25 July 1975, OJ 1975,
L249/27, [1975] 2 CMLR D67, CMR 9776 11.2
Oscar Bronner GmbH Co. KG v Mediaprint Seitungs und Zeitschriftenverlag
GmbHd Co. KG and others (C 7/97), 26 November 1998, [1998] ECR
1 7817, [1999] 4 CMLR 112, [1999] CEC 53 5.2.2.1.4, 5.2.5.4,5.2.6.3,
5.2.5.5.3,14.1.5.2
TABLE OF CASES xxxi
BRT v SABAM—Belgische Radio en Televisie (BRT) v Societe Beige des
Auteurs Compositeurs et Editeurs (SABAM) and NVFonior (127/73), 27
March 1974, [1974] ECR 51 and 313, [1974] 2 CMLR 238, CMR 8269 5.3.2,
7.2, 11.9
Bundesverbandder Arzneimittel Importeure eVand Commission v Bayer (C 2
3/01 p)_ see Adalat
Burroughs AG and Ets Delplanque and Burroughs AG and Geha Werke GmbH
(Re the Agreements between) (72/25/EEC and 72/26/EEC), 22 December
1971, JO 1972, L13/47 and 50, [1972] CMLR D67 and D72, CMR 9485
and 9486 14.1.2
Cadillon v Hoss (1/71), 11 May 1971, [1971] ECR 351, [1971] CMLR 420,
CMR 8135 2.4.6
Campari—Re the Agreement of Davide Campari Milano SpA (78/253/EEC), 23
December 1977, OJ 1978, L70/69, [1978] 2 CMLR 397, CMR 10035 14.1.2
Carbon Graphite Cartel, Press Release IP/03/1651, COMP/38.359 PO
Electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products, [2004] 4 CMLR
257 7.6.1
Carlo Bagnasco and others v Banco Popolare di Novara soc. coop. — see
Bagnasco.
Cartonboard (94/601/EC), 13 July 1994, OJ 1994, L243/1, [1994] 5 CMLR 547,
[1994] 2 CEC 2,186; on appeal, 14 May 1998, Sarrio v Commission
(T 334/94), [1998] ECR 11 1439; SCA Holding v Commission (T 327/94),
[1998] ECR 11 1373, [1998] 5 CMLR 195; in ECJ, Sarrio SA v Commission
(C 291/98 P), 16 November 2000, [2000] ECR 1 9991, SCA Holding Ltd v
Commission (C 297/98 P), 16 November 2000, [2000] ECR 1 10101, [2001] 4
CMLR 413; Cascades (T 308/94), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR 11 813,
[2002] 4 CMLR 1381; Stora (T 354/94), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR
11 813, [2002] 4 CMLR 1397 2.2.4.2, 7.6.2
CECED (2000/475/EC), OJ 2000, L187/47, [2000] 5 CMLR 635, [2000]
CEC 2,279 1.3.2.6, 3.1,6.8.3
Cement Cartel (94/815/EC), 30 November 1994, OJ 1994, L343/1, [1995] 4
CMLR 327, [1995] 1 CEC 2,092; on appeal joined cases, Cimenteries and
Others v Commission (T 25/95 etc), 15 March 2000, [2000] ECR 11 491,
[2000] 5 CMLR 204, (C 399/93), 12 December 1995 7.5.2
Centra/arm BV v American Home Products Corp (3/78), 10 Oct 1978, [1978]
ECR 1823, [1979] 1 CMLR 326, CMR 8475 10.4.4.1
Centrafarm BVandde Peijper v Sterling Drug Inc (15/74), 31 Oct 1974, [1974]
ECR 1147, [1974] 2 CMLR 480, CMR 8246. 6.8.1,10.4.1,10.4.2,10.4.4,10.7,
11.2,11.3
Centre Beige d'Etudes—see Telemarketing.
CEWAL Ors (93/82/EEC), 23 December 1992, OJ 1993, L34/20, [1995] 5
CMLR 198, [1993] 1 CEC 2,144; on appeal, see Compagnie Maritime Beige
(T 24 26 28/93), 8 October 1996, [1996] ECR II1201, [1997] 4 CMLR
273 (CFI); (C 395/96 P), 16 March 2000, [2000] ECR 1 1365, [2000] 4
CMLR 1076 (ECJ) 2.2.3,4.3.4.1.2,4.3.4.3,4.3.5,4.3.9,5.2.5.5.3,5.2.6.3,
14.1.5,14.1.5.5
xxxii TABLE OF CASES
Chiquita—see United Brands.
CICCE v Commission (C 298/83), 28 March 1985, [1985] ECR 1105, [1986] 1
CMLR486, CMR 14157 5 3 2
Cimbel~Re La Cimenterie Beige SA (72/474/EEC), 22 December 1972, JO
1972, L303/24, [1973] CMLR D167, CMR 9544 2.3.1,8.6.2
Cimenteries Re Noordwijks Cement Accoord: Cimenteries CBR
Cementbedrijven NV v EEC Commission (8 11/66), 15 March 1967, [1967]
ECR 75, [1967] CMLR 77, CMR 8052 2.3.2
Clima ChappedBuderus (Re the Agreements of) (69/241/EEC), 22 July 1969,
JO 1969, L195/1, [1970] CMLR D7, CMR 9316 13.8.2,13.8.3
CNSD—Consiglio Nazionali degli Spedizionieri Doganali v Commission
(T 513/93), 30 March 2000, [2000] ECR II 1807, [2000] 5 CMLR 614;
appeal from Commission decision (93/438/EEC), 30 June 1993, OJ 1993,
L203/27, [1995] 5 CMLR 495; ECJ on preliminary ruling also considered
same matter, see Commission v Italy (Custom agents) (C 35/96), 18 June
1998, [1998] ECR 1 3851, [1998] 5 CMLR 889 2.2.1.2.3
COBELPA—Re the Vereeniging van Nederlandsche Papierfabrikanten ( VNP)
and the Association des Fabricants de Pates, Papiers et Cartons de Belgique
(77/592/EEC), 8 September 1977, OJ 1977, L242/10, [1977] 2 CMLR D28,
CMR 9980 2.2.4.3,8.2.2
Coberco—HG Oude Luttikhuis and Others v Verenigde Cooperatieve
Melkindustrie Coberco and Dijkstra—Hendrik Evert Dijkstra and Others v
Friesland (Frico Domo) Cooperatie BA and Others (C 319/93, 40 224/94),
12 December 1995, [1995] ECR 1 4471, [1996] 5 CMLR 178 8.2.6
Coca ColalAmalgamated Beverages (97/540/EC, M.794), 22 January 1997, OJ
1997, L218/15, [1997] CEC 2,226; confirmed in Coca Cola Company and
Coca Cola Enterprises Inc v Commission (T 125 127/97), 22 March 2000,
[2000] ECR II 1733, [2000] 5 CMLR 467 4.3.1.2,4.3.1.5. 7.3.2, 7.4
Coditel (SA Compagnie Generate pour la Diffusion de la Television) v Cine Vog
Films (62/79), 18 March 1980, [1980] ECR 881, [1981] 2 CMLR 362, CMR
8662 10.4.2
Coditel If—Coditel SA v Cine Vog Films SA (No 2) (262/81), 6 October 1982,
[1982] ECR 3381, [1983] 1 CMLR 49, CMR 8865 2.4.4.2.1, 5.2.3.1.2 8.6,
10.4.2,11.3,14.1.1
Commercial Solvents—Istituto Chemioterapico Italiano SpA and Commercial
Solvents Corp v Commission (6 7/73), 6 March 1974, [1974] ECR 223,
[1974] 1 CMLR 309, CMR 8209 2.2.1.1,2.3.1,2.3.5,4.3.7, 5.2.3.4.2,5.2.4,
5.2.4.1,5.2.5.5.2, 5.2.2.5.2
Commission v Italy (Custom agents) (C 35/96), 18 June 1998, [1998] ECR
1 3851, [1998] 5 CMLR 889 2.2.1.2.3, 6.1.4
Commission v Italy (Bananas) (184/85), 7 May 1987, [1987] ECR 2013 4.3.1.1
Commission v Netherlands (Direct effect of 86 (2)) (C 157 160/94), 23
October 1997, [1997] ECR 1 5699, [1998] 2 CMLR 373 6.5
Commission v United Kingdom (Compulsory patent licences) (C 30/90), 18
February 1992, [1992] ECR 1 829, [1992] 2 CMLR 709, [1992] 1 CEC 451. 10.4.1
Commission and France v Ladbroke Racing (C359 and 379/95P), [1997] ECR
1 6265, [1998] 4 CMLR 27, [1998] CEC 474 6.3,6.4
TABLE OF CASES xxxiii
Compagnie Maritime Beige Transports SA v Commission (T 24, 26 28/93), 8
October 1996, [1996] ECR 11 1201, [1997] 4 CMLR 273, [1997] 1 CEC 74;
appeal from CEWAL; on appeal (C 395/96 P), 16 March 2000, [2000] ECR
1 1365, [2000] 4 CMLR 1076 2.2.3, 4.3.4.1.2, 4.3.5, 4.3.9, 5.1.1, 5.2.5.5.3,
5.2.5.4, 5.2.6.3
Confederation Espanola de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio v. Compagnia
de Petroleos, C 217/05, 14 December 2005 9.7.1
Consorzio Industries Fiammiferi v Autorita Garante della Concorrenza e del
Mercato (C 198/01), 9 September 2003, [2003] ECR 1 8055, [2003] 5 CMLR
829 6.1, 6.4, 7.2
Consten Grundig—Re the Agreement of Grundig Verkaufs GmbH
(64/566/EEC), 23 Sept 1964, JO 2545/64, [1964] CMLR 489; appeal
Etablissements Consten SA and Grundig Verkaufs GmbH v EEC
Commission (56 58/64), 13 July 1966, [1966] ECR 299, [1966] CMLR 418,
CMR 8046 1.2.4,2.3.1, 2.4.1, 2.4.2,
2.4.3, 2.5, 3.1.1, 7.1, 8.5, 8.6, 8.6.1, 9.1.1,9.5.1,10.2,10.4.5.1,11.3, 14.1.2.1,14.1.4
Continental Can—Re Continental Can Company Inc and Europemballage Inc
(72/21/EEC), 9 December 1971, JO 1972, L7/25, [1972] CMLR Dl 1, CMR
9481; on appeal Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Co Inc v
Commission (6/72), 21 February 1973, [1973] ECR 215, [1973] CMLR 199,
CMR 8171 1.2.2,1.2.3,1.2.4,1.4.3.2, 4.3.1,4.3.1.1, 4.3.7, 4.3.10, 5.1, 5.2,
5.2.1,5.2.2.1.1,5.2.7,12.1
Corbeau (C 320/91), 19 May 1993, [1993] ECR 1 2533, [1995] 4 CMLR 621,
[1995] 1 CEC 322 6.2.3
Courage Ltd v Bernard Crehan and Others (C 453/99), 20 September 2001,
[2001] ECR 1 6297, [2001] 5 CMLR 1058, [2001] CEC 2971.2, 1.5.2, 1.7, 7.2, 7.3.4
Cullet and Another v Centre Leclerc, Toulouse (SA Sodinord) (231/83), 29
January 1985, [1985] ECR 305, [1985] 2 CMLR 524, CMR 14139 6.1.4
Daimler Chrysler (2002/760/EC), 10 Oct 2001, OJ 2002, L257/1, [2003] CEC
2,003, [2003] 4 CMLR 95 2.2.1, 5.4, 7.6
Daimler Chrisler AG v. Commission T 325/01, [2005] ECR 11 3319 9.7.1
Dansk Supermarked AIS v Imerco A/S (58/80), 22 January 1981, [1981] ECR
181, [1981] 3 CMLR 590, CMR 8729 10.4.3
Davidoff (Zino) SA A G Imports Ltd (C 414/99) and Levi Strauss Co
and Another v Tesco (C 415/99), 20 November 2001, [2001] ECR 1 8691,
[2002] 1 CMLR 1, [2002] CEC 154 10.6
Davidson Rubber Company (Re the Agreement of) (72/237/EEC), 9 June 1972,
JO 1972, L143/31, [1972] CMLR D52, CMR 9512 2.4, 11.2,14.1.2
De Havi/and—Aerospatiale Alenia AeritalialDe Haviland (Re the
Concentration between) (91/619/EEC) (IV/M.053), 2 October 1991, OJ
1991, L334/42, [1992] 4 CMLR M2, [1992] 1 CEC 2,034, Merger Reporter
B48, p 401 12.3,12.9
De Laval/Stork VOF Joint Venture (Re) (77/543/EEC), 25 July 1977, OJ 1977,
L215/11, [1977] 2 CMLR D69, CMR 9972 12.2.1,13.2.5
Deere (John) John Deere Ltd v Commission (85/79/EEC), 14 December 1984,
OJ 1985, L35/58, [1985] 2 CMLR 554, CMR 10652; (C 7/95P), 28 May
1998, [1997] ECR 1 3111, [1998] 5 CMLR 311, [1998] CEC 611; appeal
from UK Tractors 7.4.4, 8.2.2
xxxiv TABLE OF CASES
Delimitis (Stergios) v Henninger Brdu (C 234/89), 28 February 1991, [1991]
ECR1 935, [1992] 5 CMLR 210, [1992] 2 CEC 530 2.4.4,2.4.6,5.2.2.1.3,
5.2.2.1.6,7.3.4.1,9.1.1,9.6.5, 14.1.2, 14.1.2.1, 14.2.1
Delta Chemie—Re the Agreement between DDD Ltd and Delta Chemie
(88/563/EEC), 13 October 1988, OJ 1988, L309/34, [1989] 4 CMLR 535,
CMR 95014 1412
Demo Studio Schmidt v Commission (210/81), 11 October 1983, [1983] ECR
3045, [1984] 1 CMLR 63, CMR 14009 9 4
Deutsche Post (2001/354/EEC) 20 March 2001, OJ 2001, L125/27, [2001] 5
CMLR 99 5.2.6.4
Deutsche Telekom (re access to local loop) (2003/707/EC, COMP/C 1/37.451,
37.578, 37.579), May 21 2003, OJ 2003, L263/9, [2004] 4 CMLR 790; on
appeal re confidential treatment, Deutsche Telekom v Commission
(T 271/03), OJ 2003, C264/29 5.2.6.4
Digital, XXVIIth Report on Competition Policy 1997, page 153 5.2.3
Direction General de Defensa de la Competencia—see Spanish Banks.
Distillers (Red Label), OJ 1983, C245/3, [1983] 3 CMLR 173 8.6.1
Distillers—The Distillers Company Lfc?(78/163/EEC), 20 December 1977, OJ
1978, L50/16, [1978] 1 CMLR 400, CMR 10011; on appeal The Distillers
Co Ltd v Commission (30/78), 10 July 1980, [1980] ECR 2229, [1980] 3
CMLR 121, CMR 8613 1.3.2.8,8.6.1
Dow Benelux NV v Commission ( 85/87), 17 October 1989, [1989] ECR 3137,
[1991] 4 CMLR 410 7.3.3
Dutch Nitrogenous Fertilisers—The Community v Centraal Stikstof
Verkoopkantoor BK(78/732/EEC), 20 July 1978, OJ 1978, L242/15, [1979] 1
CMLR 11, CMR 10076 8.2.3
Dyestuffs—EC Commission v Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd and Others
(1V/26.267), 24 July 1969, OJ 1969, L195/11, [1969] CMLR D23; on appeal
ICI (Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd) and Others v Commission (48, 49,
51 53, 55 57/69), 14 July 1972, [1972] ECR 619, [1972] CMLR 557, CMR
8161, and Francolor v Commission (54/69), [1972] ECR 851, CMR 8165 . . 2.2.4.2,
5.2.2.4, 7.5.3, 8.2
EATE Levy—Algemene Schippersvereniging v Association Nationale des
Travailleurs Independants de la Bdtellerie (85/383/EEC), 10 July 1985, OJ
1985, L219/35, [1988] 4 CMLR 698, CMR 10713; confirmed ANTIB
(Association Nationale des Travailleurs Independants de la Bdtellerie) v
Commission (272/85), 20 May 1987, [1987] ECR 2201, [1988] 4 CMLR 677,
CMR 14458 8.6.2
Echimlles Distribution SA v Association de Dauphine and Others(C 9/99), 3
October 2000, [2000] ECR I 8207, [2003] 2 CMLR 506 6.1.4
EMI Electrola GmbH v Patricia Im und Export (341/87), 24 January 1989,
[1989] ECR 79, [1989] 2 CMLR 413, [1990] 1 CEC 322 '. . 10.5.1
EMI Records Ltd v CBS United Kingdom Ltd and Others (51, 86 96/75), 15
June 1976, [1976] ECR 811 et seq, [1976] 2 CMLR 235, CMR 8350 52 . 10.4.6
Enkhem v Commission (C 251/99) and others, 15 Oct 2002,, reported under
the name of Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappifj v Commission (C 238/99 P),
[2002] ECR 1 8375, [2003] 4 CMLR 397, appeal from PVCII 2.2.1.1, 7.3.3,
7.4.1,7.5,7.5.2,8.2
TABLE OF CASES xxxv
EnsolStora (M. 1225), 25 November 1998, OJ 1999 L254/9, [2000] 4 CMLR
372 (summary only). Comment: 'nera Competition Brief 9: Buyer Power and
the EnsolStora Decision at www.nera.com 12.5.2
EPI Code of Conduct (1999/267/EC), 23 April 1999, OJ 1999, L106/14, [1999]
5 CMLR 540, largely confirmed Institut des Mandataires Agree v
Commission (T 144/99), 28 March 2001, [2001] ECR 11 1087, [2001] 5
CMLR 77 2.2.1.2.3, 2.2.3
Erauw Jacquery (Louis) SPRL v La Hesbignonne SC (27/87), 19 April 1988, ¦
[1988] ECR 1919, [1988] 4 CMLR 576, [1989] 2 CEC 637 8.6,11.3,14.1.1
Eurocontrol, Bavaria Fluggesellschaft Schwabe Co v. Eurocontrol, 9 10/77, 14
July 1977, [1977]ECR 1517 [1980] 1 CMLR 566 2.2.1.1, 6.2.1.4
European Night Services (ENS) and Others v Commission (T 374, 375, 384
388/94), 15 September 1998, [1998] ECR 11 3141, [1998] 5 CMLR 718,
[1998] CEC 955; appeal from Commission decision (94/663/EC, IV/34.600),
21 September 1994, OJ 1994, L259/20, [1995] 5 CMLR 76 1.4.3.2, 2.4.4.1,
2.4.4.7,2.4.6,2.4.4.7,4.3.1.2,4.3.10,5.2.5.5,13.2, 13.2.2.1,13.2.1.3.2,13.2.2,
13.2.3,14.1.1,14.1.3
ExxonlShell (94/322/EC, IV/33.640), 18 May 1994, OJ 1994, L144/20, [1994] 5
CMLR 19 (summary only), [1994] 2 CEC 2,060 13.2.1
Federation Nationale des Syndicats Exploitatants Agricoles and Others (French
Bovine Cartel) (2003/600/EC, COMP/C.38.279/F3), OJ 2003, L 209/12,
[2003] 5 CMLR 891 6.1.1
FEDETAB—GB Inno BM SA v Federation Belgo Luxembourgeoise des
Industries du Tabac (78/670/EEC), 20 July 1978, OJ 1978, L224/29, [1978] 3
CMLR 524, CMR 10070; on appeal Heintz van Landewyck Sari, Federation
Belgo Luxembourgeoise des Industries du Tabac Asbl v Commission (209 215
6 218/78), 29 October 1980, [1980] ECR 3125, [1981] 3 CMLR 134, CMR
8687 7.4.4,8.1.3, 8.3, 8.5,9.4, 9.7.2
FEN IN C 205/03 P, 11 July 2006, [2006] ECR 1 6295 Appeal from (T 319/99),
4 March 2003, [2003] ECR 11 357, [2003] 5 CMLR 34. 110 2.2.1.2.2,5.3.2,
6.2.1.3, 8.2.6
Ferriere Nord v Commission (C 219/95 P), July 17, 1997, [1997] ECR 1 4411,
[1997] 5 CMLR 575, [1998] CEC 19; appeal from Ferriere Nord v
Commission (T 143/89), [1995] ECR 11 917 and from Welded Steel Mesh
(89/515/EEC, IV/31.553), OJ 1989, L 260/1 2.4
Filtrona Espafiola SA v Commission (T 125/89), 10 July 1990, [1990] ECR
11 393, [1990] 4 CMLR 832; appeal from rejection of complaint,
Nineteenth Report on Competition Policy for 1989, point 61 4.3.1.2
FFSA and others v Ministere de I'Agriculture et de la Peche (C 244/94),
16 November 1995, [1995] ECR 1 4013, [1996] 4 CMLR 536 (limits Poucet,
paras 17) 2.2.1.2.1, 6.2.1.2
Fine Papers—Re the Agreement of Papeteries Bellore SA and Braunstein Freres
SA (72/291/EEC), 26 July 1972, JO 1972, L182/24, [1972] CMLR D94,
CMR 9523 13.8.2
Finnpap—Finnish Paper Mills, Article 19(3) Notice, OJ 1989, C45/4, [1989]
4 CMLR 413, CMR 95072; press release describing comfort letter,
IP(89)496 8.2.3,14.1.2,13.2.5,14.1.2
xxxvi TABLE OF CASES
Fire Insurance—Verbandder Sachversicherer eV v Commission (45/85), 27
January 1987, [1987] ECR 405, [1988] 4 CMLR 264, CMR 14413 2.3.3
Floral—Re Floral Dungemitteherkaufsgesellschaft mbH (80/182/ EEC), 28
November 1979, OJ 1980, L39/51, [1980] 2 CMLR 285, CMR 10184 8.2.3
Ford Werke AG and Ford of Europe Inc v Commission (25 26/84), 17
September 1985, [1985] ECR 2725, [1985] 3 CMLR 528, CMR 14144 2.2.2.2
France v Commission (C 202/88), 19 March 1991, [1991] ECR 1 1223, [1992] 5
CMLR 552, [1993] 1 CEC 748 6.2.3, 12.3
France v Commission (C 69/94 and 30/95), 31 March 1998, [1998] ECR 1 1375,
[1998] 4 CMLR 829; appeal from Kali und Salz (IV/M.3O8), OJ 1993,
L395/1 2.2.1, 2.4.5, 4.3.5,12.3,12.4.1,12.5.1,12.5.4
Francovich v Italy (C 6 9/90), 19 November 1991, [1991] ECR 1 5357, [1993]
2 CMLR 66, [1993] 1 CEC 604 6.2.3, 6.5
French New Potatoes (Re) (88/109/EEC), 18 December 1987, OJ 1988, L59/25,
[1988] 4 CMLR 790, CMR 10978 1 2 5
French West African Shipowners' Committees: Association of Danish
Shipowners and Denmark v Navale Delmas Afrique (92/262/EEC), 1 April
1992, OJ 1992, L134/1, [1993] 5 CMLR 446, [1992] 2 CEC 2,028 4.3.5
FRUBO—Nederlandse Vereniging voor de Fruit en Groentenimporthandel
'FRUBO' v Commission and Vereniging de Fruitunie (71/74), 15 May 1975,
[1975] ECR 563, [1975] 2 CMLR 123, CMR 8285 1.2.5, 2.2.3, 2.3.2
GEMA (71/224/CEE, IV/26 760), JO 1971, L134/15, [1971] CMLR D 35 . 5.1,11.9
GencorlLonrho (IV/M.619), 24 April 1996, OJ 1997, LI 1/30, [1999] 4 CMLR
1076, [1997] CEC 2,055; appeal Gencor Ltd v Commission (T 102/96), 25
March 1999, [1999] ECR 11 753, [1999] 4 CMLR 971, [1999] CEC 395,
Merger Reporter B412, p 2485 . . 1.3.3.2,1.6,4.3.5,12.3.1,12.3.2,12.5.1,14.1.5.5
General Electric Aircraft Engines/Pratt Whitney (2000/182/EC), 14
September 1999, OJ 2000, L58/16, [2000] 5 CMLR 49, [2000[ CEC 2,172,
JV to produce aero engines for very large planes, exempt because provided
competitor to Rolls Royce 12.6.1
General Electric Co v. Commission December 14 2005 (T 210/01) [2005]
ECR II 5575, appeal from decision GEIHoneywell, 2004/134, [2004] OJ
L48/1 2.2.2.3, 2.4.6, 5.2.3, 12.6.1, 12.7.3,14.1.1
General Motors Continental NV v Commission (26/75), 13 November 1975,
[1975] ECR 1367, [1976] 1 CMLR 95, CMR 8320 5.3.1,5.4, 5.6
German Ceramic Tiles—Re the Discount Agreement of the
Interessengemeinschaft der Deutschen Keramischen Wand und
Bodenfiiesenwerke (71/23/EEC), 29 December 1970, JO 1971, L10/15,
[1971] CMLR D6, CMR 9409 2.3.2, 8.4
German Machine Blacksmiths—Re the business records of the Vereinigung
Deutscher Freiformschmieden (78/24/EEC), 8 December 1977, OJ 1978,
LI0/32, [1978] 1 CMLR D63, CMR 10004 7.4.2
Glaxo Wellcome (2001/791/EC, IV/36.957/F3), 8 May 2001. OJ 2001 L302/1
[2002] 4 CMLR 335, [2002] CEC 2,107 2.2.2.2
GlaxoSmithKline services Unlimited T 168/01, 27 December 2006, appeals
pending C 501/06 P 1.2.3.1, 2.2.2.2, 2.4, 2.4.2, 2.4.4.2, 2.4.4.2.1, 5.2.2, 5.3.3,
5.6,8.1.3,8.6,10.4.5.1
TABLE OF CASES xxxvii
Gosmel Martel—Vincent Gosme SA v Distribution Martell Piper SA
(91/335/EEC), 15 May 1991, OJ 1991, L185/23, [1992] 5 CMLR 586, [1991]
2 CEC 2,110 2.2.1.1
Gottrup Klim (C 250/92), December 15, 1994, [1994] ECR 15641, [1996] 4
CMLR 191, [1995] 1 CEC 461 9.6.1.3
Grosfillex Sdrl (Re the Agreement of) (64/233/EEC), 11 March 1964, JO
915/64, [1964] CMLR 237 9.3
Groupement des Fabricants de Papiers Peints de Belgique v Commission (73/74),
26 November 1975, [1975] ECR 1491, [1976] 1 CMLR 589, CMR 8335 . 2.3.1, 9.3
Grundig—see Consten Grundig.
Grundig II (85/404/EEC), 10 July 1985, OJ 1985, L233/1, [1988] 4 CMLR 865,
CMR 10701 9.4
Guerlain—Procureur de la Republique v Giry and Guerlain (253/78 1 3/79), 10
July 1980, [1980] ECR 2327, [1981] 2 CMLR 99, CMR 8712 7.3.4.2
GVL (Gesellschaft zur Verwertung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH) v
Commission (7/82), 2 March 1983, [1983] ECR 483, [1983] 3 CMLR 645,
CMR 8910 5.3.4.1
Hag II—CNL Sucal v Hag (C 10/89), 17 October 1990, [1990] ECR 1 3711,
[1990] 3 CMLR 571, [1991] 2 CEC 457 10.4.4
Hasselblad (GB) Ltd v Commission (86/82), 21 February 1984, [1984] ECR
883, [1984] 1 CMLR 559, CMR 14014 8.6.1
Hauptzollamt Mainz v CA Kupfirberg Cie KG (104/81), 26 October 1982,
[1982] ECR 3641, [1983] 1 CMLR 1, CMR 8877 10.4.6
Hercules v Commission (see also Polypropylene cases) (T 7/89),
17 December 1991, [1991] ECR 11 1711, [1992] 4 CMLR 84, [1992] 1 CEC
207 (CFI); Hercules v Commission (C 51/92 P), 8 July 1999, [1999] ECR
1 4235 (ECJ) 2.2.2.1, 7.5.1, 7.5.3
Hilti—Eurofix Ltd and Bauco ( UK) Ltd v Hilti AG (88/138/EEC), 22
December 1987, OJ 1988, L65/19, [1989] 4 CMLR 677, CMR 10976; on
appeal Hilti AG v Commission (T 30/89), 12 December 1991, [1991] ECR
11 1439, [1992] 4 CMLR 16, [1992] 1 CEC 155 (CFI); Hilti AG v EC
Commission (C 53/92P), 2 March 1994, [1994] ECR 1 666, [1994] 1 CMLR
590, [1994] 1 CEC 590 (ECJ) 4.3.3, 5.2.3, 5.2.3.4.1, 5.2.3.4.2, 5.2.3.4.4
Hoechst A G and Others v Commission (46/87 227/88), 21 September 1989,
[1989] ECR 2859, [1991] 4 CMLR 410, [1991] 1 CEC 280 7.4.2, 7.5.1
Hoffmann La Roche Co AG v Centrafarm Vertriebsgesellschaft
Pharmazeutischer Erzeugnisse GmbH (102/77), 23 May 1978, [1978] ECR
1139, [1978] 3 CMLR 217, CMR 8466 4.3.4.1.2, 10.4.4.1
Hoffmann La Roche Co AGv Commission (85/76), 13 February 1979, [1979]
ECR 461, [1979] 3 CMLR 211, appeal from decision, OJ 1976, L223/27,
[1976] 2 CMLR D25 1.2, 5.1.1, 5.2, 5.2.2, 5.2.2.1.2, 5.2.2.1.3, 5.2.2.4, 5.2.6,
5.2.6.1,14.1.5
Hoffmann La Roche Co AG ( Vitamins Cartel) (2003/2/EC), OJ 2003, L6/1,
[2003] 4 CMLR 1030, [2003] CEC 2,418 1.7
Hofner and Elser v Macrotron GmbH(C 41/90), 23 April 1991, [1991] ECR
1 1979, [1993] 4 CMLR 306, [1993] 1 CEC 238 2.2.1.1,4.3.2, 6.2.1.1,6.2.2
Hugin—Liptons Cash Registers and Business Equipment Ltd v Hugin
Kassaregister AB (78/68/EEC), 8 December 1977, OJ 1978, L22/23, [1978] 1
xxxviii TABLE OF CASES
CMLR D19, CMR 10007; on appeal Hugin Kassaregister AB v Commission
(22/78), 31 May 1979, [1979] ECR 1869, [1979] 3 CMLR 345, CMR 8524 . 2.3.?
4.3.3,5.2.4.4,5.2.5.1,5.6
Hydrotherm Geratebau GmbH v Compact de Don Ing Mario Andreoli e C Sets
(170/83), 12 July 1984, [1984] ECR 2999, [1985] 3 CMLR 627,
CMR 14112 22U
IBM v Commission (C 60/81), 11 Nov 1981, [1981] ECR 2639, [1981] 3 CMLR
635, CMR 8708; see also Fourteenth Report on Competition Policy, point
77 7.5.5
Ideal Standards Distribution System (85/45/EEC), 10 December 1984, OJ
1985, L20/38, [1988] 4 CMLR 627, [1988] CMR 10662 9A
Ideal Standard—IHT Internazionale Heiztechnik GmbH v Ideal Standard
GmbH (C 9/93), 22 June 1994, [1994] ECR 1 2789, [1994] 3 CMLR 857,
[1994] 2 CEC 222 10 4 4
IFTRA Rules for Producers of Virgin Aluminium (75/497/EEC), 15 July 1975,
OJ 1975, L228/3, [1975] CMLR D20 8 2.1
IFTRA Rules on Glass Containers—Re European Glass Manufacturers
(74/292/EEC), 15 May 1974, OJ 1974, L160/1, [1974] 2 CMLR D50, CMR
9658 8.2.2
IMS interim order of Commission (2002/165/EC, COMP D3/38.044),
3 July 2001, OJ 2002, L59/18, [2002] 4 CMLR 58, [2002] CEC 2,234, . . 5.2.5.5.1,
5.2.2.5.2
IMS Health v Commission //(T 184/01 R II), 26 October 2001, OJ 2002,
C144/45, [2002] 4 CMLR 58 (order of the President of the CFI suspending
the duty to license), NDC Health v Commission (C 481/01 P(R)), 11 April
2002, [2002] ECR 1 3401, [2002] 5 CMLR 44, confirmed by the President
of the ECJ, NDC Health v IMS Health (2003/741/EC, COMP D3/38.044),
13 August 2003, OJ 2003, L268/69, [2003] 5 CMLR 820 (withdrawal of
interim decision) 5.2.5.5.1
Independent Music Publishers and Labels Association v. Commission,
(IMPALA), 13 July 2006, T 464/04 7.5.2, 12.4.3, 14.1.5.5
Inno (GB Inno BM NV) v ATAB ( Vereniging van de Kleinhandelaars in
Tabak) (13/77), 16 November 1977, [1977] ECR 2115, [1978] 1 CMLR 283,
CMR 8442 6.1.3
Institut des Mandataires Agrees v Commission (EPI) (T 144/99), 28 March
2001, [2001] ECR 11 1087, [2001] 5 CMLR 2 2.2.1.2.3
Indium (97/39/EC), 18 December 1996, OJ 1997, L18/87, [1997] 4 CMLR
1065, [1997] CEC 2,104 13.2.1.3.1
Irish Sugar (C 497/99 R), 10 July 2001, [2001] ECR 1 5332, [2001] 5 CMLR
1082 2.2.1.1, 4.3.5, 5.2.2,5.2.2.2,5.2.2.4,5.2.7.3, 5.4
Italian Cast Glass—The Community v Fabbrica Pisana SpA and Others
(80/1334/EEC), 17 December 1980, OJ 1980, L383/19, [1982] 2 CMLR 61,
CMR 10285 2.2.1.1, 4.3.5
Italian Flat Glass—Industria Vetraria Alfonso Cobelli v Fabbrica Pisana SpA
and Others (89/93/EEC), 7 December 1988, OJ 1989, L33/44, [1990] 4
CMLR 535, [1989] 1 CEC 2,077; on appeal Societa Italiana Vetro SpA v
Commission (T 68, 77 78/89), 10 March 1992, [1992] ECR 11 1403, [1992]
5 CMLR 302, [1992] 2 CEC 33 2.2.2.3,4.3.5,4.3.10,7.5.3
k
i
TABLE OF CASES xxxix
Italy v Commission (Re British Telecommunications) (41/83), 20 March 1985,
[1985] ECR 873, [1985] 2 CMLR 368, CMR 14168 6.2.1
Italy Poste Italiane SpA (2001/176/EC), 21 December 2000, OJ 2001,
L63/59, [2001] 5 CMLR 595 (not in CEC) 5.2.7.2
Javico International and Javico AGv Yves Saint Laurent Parfums SA
(C 306/96), 28 April 1998, [1998] ECR 1 1983, [1998] 5 CMLR 172, [1998]
CEC 813 9.6.4,10.6
JCB Service v Commission (T 67/01), 13 Jan 2004, OJ 2004, C85/23, [2004] 4
CMLR 1346 1.4.3.2
KaliundSalz AG andKali Chemie v Commission (19 20/74), 14 May 1975,
[1975] ECR 499, [1975] 2 CMLR 154, CMR 8284 2.4.5
Kali und Salz/MdklTreuhand(lVIM.3M), OJ 1994, LI86/38, Merger Reporter
B178, p 1282.1 and 1284.3, [1994] 2 CEC 2,090; on appeal France v
Commission (C 68/94 30/95) [1998] ECR 1 1453, [1998] 4 CMLR 829 . 12.3.1,
12.5.1
Keurkoop BV v Nancy Kean Gifts BV{144/81), 14 September 1982, [1982] ECR
2853, [1983] 2 CMLR 47, CMR 8861 10.4.1,10.4.2, 10.4.6, 10.5.1
KEWA—ReKernbrennstoff Wiederaufarbeitungs Gesellschaft GmbH
(76/249/EEC), 23 December 1975, OJ 1976, L51/15, [1976] 2 CMLR D15,
CMR 9807 1.3.3.2.1,4.3.1.2
Konsortium(90/446/EEC), 27 July 1990, OJ 1990, L228/31, [1992] 4 CMLR 54,
[1990] 2 CEC 2,082 13.2.1.3.1
Friedrich Kremzow v Austria (C 299/95), 20 May 1997, [1997] ECR 1 2629,
[1997] 3 CMLR 1289 7.5.1
Kyowa Hakko Kogyo and Another v Commission (T 223/00), 9 July 2003, OJ
2003, C213/27, [2003] ECR 11 2553 7.6.1, 8.2
La Crespelle—Societe Civile Agricole du Centre v dInsemination Artificielle du
Departement de la Mayenne (C 323/93), 5 October 1994, [1994] ECR 1 5077 . 4.3.6
Langnese Iglo GmbH Co KG (93/406/EEC), 23 December 1992, OJ 1993,
L183/19, [1994] 4 CMLR 51, [1993] 2 CEC 2,123; on appeal Langnese Iglo
GmbH Co KG v Commission (T 7/93), 8 June 1995, [1995] ECR 11 1533,
[1995] 5 CMLR 602, [1995] 2 CEC 217, paras 94 113; the final appeal did
not consider much of the substance, (C 279/95 P), 1 October 1998, [1998]
ECR 1 5609, [1998] 5 CMLR 933 3.1.2.1, 9.6.6,14.1.2
Leclerc—Association des Centres Distributees EdouardLeclerc v Au Ble Vert
Sari (229/83), 10 January 1985, [1985] ECR 1, [1985] 2 CMLR 286, CMR
14111 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.1.5,6.8.4, 9.4
Leclerc (Association des Centres Distributeurs Edouardj v Commission
(T 88/92), 12 December 1996, [1996] ECR II 1961, appeal from Givenchy
(92/428/EEC, IV/33.542), 24 July 1992, OJ 1992, L236/11, [1993] 5 CMLR
579, [1992] 2 CEC 208; a virtually identical judgment under the same
names was given (T 19/92), 12 December 1996, [1996] ECR 11 1851, [1997]
4 CMLR 995, on appeal from Parfums Yves Saint Laurent (92/33/EEC,
IV/33.242), 16 December 1991, OJ 1992, L12/24, [1993] 4 CMLR 120,
[1992] 1 CEC 2,071 1.5.2, 7.2,14.1.2
Levi Strauss v Tesco (C 414 16/99), 20 Nov 2001, [2001] ECR 1 8691, [2002] 1
CMLR 1, [2002] CEC 154 10.6
xl TABLE OF CASES
Librairies de Normandie (Syndicat des) v L'Aigle Distribution SA, Centre
Leclerc (254/87), 14 July 1988, [1988] ECR 4457, [1990] 4 CMLR 37, [1990]
1 CEC 94 6L5
Louis Erauw Jacquery—see Erauw Jacquery.
Lucazeau v SACEM (110/88), 13 My 1989, [1989] ECR 2811, [1991] 4 CMLR
248, [1990] 2 CEC 856 5.1.1, 1L9
Magill TV Guide (Re the): ITP, BBC and RTE v Commission (89/205/EEC), 21
December 1988, OJ 1989, L78/43, [1989] 4 CMLR 757, [1989] 1 CEC 2,223;
on appeal Radio Telefis Eireann and Others v Commission (T 69, 70, 76 77
91/89), 10 July 1991, [1991] ECR 11 485 et seq, [1991] 4 CMLR 586 et
seq, [1991] 2 CEC 114, 147 174 (CFI); Radio Telefis Eireann and Others v
Commission (C 241 242/91 P), 6 April 1995, [1995] ECR 1 743, [1995] 4
CMLR 718, [1995] 1 CEC 400 (ECJ) 4.3.3, 5.2.5.2, 5.2.5.3, 5.2.5.5.1,
5.2.2.5.2,10.6
Maize Seed—see Nungesser.
Manfredi v Lloyd Adriatico Assicurazioni Spa and other cases, C 294 298/04, 13
July 2006 7.2
Masterfoods Ltd and HB Ice Cream v Commission (C 344/98), 14 Dec 2000,
[2000] ECR 1 1136, [2001] CMLR 449 3.1.1, 7.3.4
Meng ( Wolf W) (C 2/91), 17 November 1993, [1993] ECR 1 5751 6.1.4
Merci Convenzionali Porto di Genova v Siderurgica Gabrielli (C 179/90), 10
December 1991, [1991] ECR 1 5889, [1994] 4 CMLR 422, [1994] 1 CEC 196
4.3.1.2, 4.3.6,5.2.4.5, 6.2, 6.2.3
Merck Co Inc v Primecrown Limited (C 267 268/95), 5 December 1996,
[1996] ECR 1 6285, [1997] 1 CMLR 83, [1997] 1 CEC 261 10.4.5,14.1.2.1
Merck Co Inc v Stephar BF(187/80), 14 July 1981, [1981] ECR 2063, [1981]
3 CMLR 463, CMR 8707 10.4.1,10.4.2,10.7,14.1.2.1,14.1.4
Metro I—Metro v Commission (26/76), 25 October 1977, [1977] ECR 1875,
[1978] 2 CMLR 1, CMR 8435 1.3.2.5,1.3.2.7, 2.4.4.4, 9.4
Metro II—Metro SB Grofimiirkte GmbH Co KG v Commission (75/84), 22
October 1986, [1986] ECR 3021, [1987] 1 CMLR 118, CMR 14326 14.1.2.1
Mi'tropole I—Metropole Television SA and Others v Commission (T 528, 542,
543, 546/93), 11 July 1996, [1996] ECR 11 649, [1996] 5 CMLR 386, [1996]
CEC 794; appeal from EBU 3.1.1.1, 7.5.5,14.1.2
Metropole (T 206/99), 21 March 2001, [2001] ECR 11 1057, [2001] 4 CMLR
1423 2.4.4.2.1, 3.1.1.1, 14.1.2.1
Metropole Television (M6) and Others v Commission II (T l 12/99), 18
September 2001, [2002] ECR 11 2459, [2001] 5 CMLR 1236 . 11.5.1,13.2.1.3.2
Mkhelin I Bandengroothandel Frieschehrug BVv Nederlandsche
Banden Industrie Mkhelin A'l/(81/969/EEC), 7 October 1981, OJ 1981,
L353/33, [1982] 1 CMLR 643, CMR 10340; on appeal Nederlandsche
Banden Industrie Mkhelin v Commission (322/81), 9 November 1983, [1983]
ECR 3461, [1985] 1 CMLR 282, CMR 14031 . 1.3.3.2, 4.3.1.1, 4.3.1.2, 4.3.1.4,
4.3.8,4.3.10, 5.2.2.1.2,5.2.2.4,5.2.3.1.4, 8.4
Mkhelin //(2002/405/EC), OJ 2002, L143/1, [2002] 5 CMLR 388, [2002] CEC
2,503; on appeal (T 203/01), 30 Sept 2003, [2003] ECR 11 4071, [2004] 4
CMLR 923 4.3.1.2,5.1.2,5.2.2,5.2.2.1.4,5.2.2.1.5,5.2.2.4,5.2.3.4.4,
5.3.3,14.1.5.4
TABLE OF CASES xli
Micro Leader Business (T 198/98), 16 December 1999, [1999] ECR 11 3989,
[2000] 4 CMLR 886, [2000] CEC 540 10.6
Microsoft March 24 2004, europa.eu.int/comm./competition/index en, [2005] 4
CMLR 965 1.3.3.2.2, 4.3.4.1.1, 4.3.4.1.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.3.4.4, 5.2.2.5.2, 14.1.5
Microsoft v. Commission, T 201/04, [2005 ] 4 CMLR 406, (CFI interim order,
refusing to suspend remedies granted by Commission, IP (04)382), [2004] 4
CMLR 1231 1.4.3.1
Milchfdrderungsfonds, The Community v (85/76/EEC), 7 December 1984, OJ
1985, L35/35, [1985] 3 CMLR 101, CMR 10649 8.6.2
Miller International Schallplatten GmbH v Commission (19/77), 1 February
1978, [1978] ECR 131, [1978] 2 CMLR 334, CMR 8439 . 2.4.2, 2.4.6, 8.6, 11.3
Ministere Public v Asjes—see Nouvelles Frontieres.
Ministere Public v Tournier—see SAC EM.
Mitchell CottslSofiltra—Re Mitchell Cotts Air Filtration Ltd (811W0IEEC), 17
December 1986, OJ 1987, L41/31, [1988] 4 CMLR 111, CMR 10852 14.1.2
Mitsubishi Corp. and Union Carbide Corp. (UCAR), Re the Concentration
between (IV/M.024), 4 January 1991, [1992] 4 CMLR M50, Merger
Reporter, B.7, p. 37 12.2.2
Musik Vertrieb Membran GmbH v Gesellschaft fur Musikalische Auffuhrungs
und Mechanische Vervielfdltigungsrechte (GEMA) (55 57/80), 20 January
1981, [1981] ECR 147, [1981] 2 CMLR 44, CMR 8670 10.4.2
Napier Brown Co Ltd v British Sugar pic (88/518/EEC), 18 July 1988, OJ
1988, L284/41, [1990] 4 CMLR 196 5.2.7.3
National Panasonic—The Community v National Panasonic (UK) Ltd
(82/853/EEC), 7 December 1982, OJ 1982, L354/28, [1983] 1 CMLR 497,
CMR 10441; on appeal National Panasonic (UK) Ltd v Commission
(136/79), 26 June 1980, [1980] ECR 2033, [1980] 3 CMLR 169, CMR 8682 . . 7.4.2
Nungesser (LG) KG and Kurt Eisele v Commission (258/78), 8 June 1982,
[1982] ECR 2015, [1983] 1 CMLR 278, CMR 8805, appeal from OJ 1978,
L286/23 2.4.4.2.1,8.1.2,8.1.3, 11.2, 11.3,14.1.1
Nuovo Cegam—Re the Application by Nuovo Consorzio Centrale Guasti alle
Macchine (84/191/EEC), 30 March 1984, OJ 1984, L99/29, [1984] 2 CMLR
484, CMR 10584 8.2.2
Nutricia—Re the Agreements of Verenigde Bedrijven Nutricia NV
(83/670/EEC), 12 December 1983, OJ 1983, L376/22, [1984] 2 CMLR 165,
CMR 10567; appeal sub nom Remia 8.1.2
NVIAZ International Belgium and Others v Commission—see Anseau.
02 (Germany) GmbH Co. OHG v. Commission, 2 May 2006. (T 328 03).
[2006] ECR 11 000 13.2.1.3.2
ODIN—ElopaklMetal Box Odin Developments Ltd(90/410/EEC), 13 July
1990, OJ 1990, L209/15, [1991] 4 CMLR 832, [1990] 2 CEC 2,066 2.4.4.7,
13.2.1.3.1, 13.2.3,14.1.1,14.1.2,14.1.3
Ohra—Officier van Justitie v Ohra Shadeverzekeringen (C 245/91), 17
November 1993, [1993] ECR 1 5851 6.1.4
Olivetti/Digital (94/771/EC), 11 November 1994, OJ 1994, L309/24, [1995] 1
CEC 2,082 13.2.1.3.1
xlii TABLE OF CASES
Optical Fibres (Re) (86/405/EEC), 14 July 1986, OJ 1986, L236/30, CMR
10813 13.2.1.3,13.2.4,14.1.1
Organic Peroxides Cartel, 10 Dec 2003, Press Release IP 03/1700, [2004] 4
CMLR 259 7 61
Orkem v Commission (374/87), 18 October 1989, [1989] ECR 3283, [1991] 4
CMLR 502, [1991] 2 CEC 19. (see SGL Carbon below) 7.4.1, 7.4.2,7.5.1
Oscar Bronner GmbH Co KG v Mediaprint Zeitungs und Zeitschriftenverlag
GmbH Co KG and Others (C 7/97), 26 November 1998, [1998] ECR
1 7817, [1999] 4 CMLR 112, [1999] CEC 53 1.3.3.2, 5.2.5.4,14.1.5,14.1.5.1
Parfums Givenchy, Re the Selective Distribution System of see Leclerc.
Parfums Yves Saint Laurent (92/33/EEC), 16 December 1991, OJ 1992, L12/24,
[1993] 4 CMLR 120, [1992] 1 CEC 2,071 9.4
Parke, Davis Co v Probel (24/67), 29 Feb 1968, [1968] ECR 55, [1968]
CMLR 47, CMR 8054 4.3.1.1, 4.3.2,4.3.10
Pavlov and Another v Stichting Pensioensfond Medische Specialistenond
Medische Specialisten (C 180/98), [2000] ECR 1 6451, [2001] 4 CMLR 30 2.2.1.2.3
Peterbroeck, Van Campenhout Cie v Belgian State (C 312/93), 14 December
1995, [1995] ECR 1 4599, [1996] 1 CMLR 793 1.5.2, 7.2
Petroflna (T 2/89), 24 October 1991, [1991] ECR 11 1087 2.2.2.3
Pfizer Inc v Eurim Pharm GmbH (1/81), 3 December 1981, [1981] ECR 2913,
[1982] 1 CMLR 406, CMR 8737 10.4.4.1
Pharmon BV v Hoechst AG (19/84), 9 July 1985, [1985] ECR 2281, [1985] 3
CMLR 775, CMR 14206 10.4.1
Philip Morris, Fourteenth Report on Competition Policy, point 98; appeal sub
nom BAT v Commission 13.2
Pigs Bacon Commission v McCarren and Co Ltd (111Hi), 26 June 1979,
[1979] ECR 2161, [1979] 3 CMLR 389, CMR 8592 4.3.6
Pioneer—Re Pioneer Hi Fi Equipment (80/256/EEC), 14 December 1979, OJ
1980, L60/21, [1980] 1 CMLR 457, CMR 10185; on appeal Musique
Diffusion Francaise SA v Commission (100 103/80), 7 June 1983, [1983]
ECR 1825, [1983] 3 CMLR 221, CMR 8880 1.7, 7.4.2,7.5.5
Pittsburg Corning Europe (Re) (72/403/EEC), 23 November 1972, JO 1972,
L272/35, [1973] CMLR D2, CMR 9539 9.7.1
Plaumunn v Commission (25/62), 15 July 1963, [1963] ECR 95, [1964] CMLR
29, CMR 8013 3.1.1.1
PMIIDSV(951373/EC, IV/33.375), 31 January 1995, OJ 1995 L221/34, [1996] 5
CMLR 320, [1995] 2 CEC 2,169 10.4.1
Polistili'Arbois and Arbois Modelud (Re the Agreement Between) (84/282/EEC),
16 May 1984, OJ 1984, L136/9, [1984] 2 CMLR 594, CMR 10587 8.6.1
Polydor Ltd and RSO Records Inc v Harlequin Record Shops Ltd (270/80), 9
February 1982, [1982] ECR 329, [1982] 1 CMLR 677, CMR 8806 . 10.4.6
Polypropylene—Re Polypropylene Cartel: The Commission v IClpic
(86/398/EEC), 23 April 1986, OJ 1986, L230/1, [1988] 4 CMLR 347, CMR
10782 and 10851; See also Hercules; on appeal (T l 4, 6 15/89), 17
December 1991, [1991] ECR 11 869 et seq, [1992] 4 CMLR 84 !. 2.2.2.3,2.2.4.2
Portuguese Airports Landing Fees (1999/199/EC, IV/35.703), 10 February 1999,
OJ 1999, L 69/31, [1999] 5 CMLR 103; in ECJ see Portuguese Republic v ',
TABLE OF CASES xliii
Commission (C 163/99), 29 March 2001, [2001] ECR 1 2613, [2002] 4
CMLR 1319 5.2.2.3, 5.2.2.4,14.1.5.3
Postbank v Commission (T 353/94), 18 September 1996, [1996] ECR 11 921,
[1997] 1 CMLR 33, [1997] CEC 454 7.3.4.3, 7.4.4
Poucet—Christian Poucet v Assurances Generates de France (AGP) and Caisse
Mutuelle Regionale du Languedoc Roussillion (Camulrac) and Daniel Pistre
v Caisse Autonome Nationale de Compensation de I'Assurance Vieillesse des
Artisans (Cancava) (C 159 160/91), 17 February 1993, [1993] ECR 1 637,
[1993] 4 CMLR 401 2.2.1.2.1, 6.2.1.2
Pre insulated Pipe Cartel (1999/60/EC, IV/35.691/E 4), 21 October 1998, OJ
1999, L24/1, [1998] CMLR 402, [1999] 1 CEC 2,020; appeals, LR AF1998
AIS v Commission (T 23/99), 20 March 2002, [2002] ECR 11 1705, [2002] 5
CMLR 571 (CFI); Judgment of the ECJ in Pre insulated Pipe Cartel,
Dansk Rorindustri AIS v Commission and others (C 189, 202, 205 208/02 P)
June 28 2005. [2005] ECR I 5425 1.7
Promedia ITT NVv Commission, supported by Belgacom (T l 11/96), 17 July
1998, [1998] ECR 11 2937, [1998] 5 CMLR 491 5.2.7.2
Pronuptia (87/17/EEC), 17 December 1986, OJ 1987, L13/39, [1989] 4 CMLR
355, CMR 10854; in ECJ Pronuptia de Paris GmbH v Pronuptia de Paris
Irmgard Schillgalis (161/84), 28 January 1986, [1986] ECR 353, [1986] 1
CMLR 414, CMR 14245. . 1.2.1, 2.3.3, 3.1.2.3, 2.4.4.2.1, 8.1.2, 8.1.3, 9.5.1, 9.6.5
PVC Cartel (89/190/EEC), 21 December 1988, OJ 1989, L74/1, [1990] 4
CMLR 345, [1989] 1 CEC 2,167, decision annulled on formal grounds
Hercules v Commission (T 7/89), 17 December 1991, [1991] ECR 11 1711,
[1992] 1 CEC 207, BASF and Others (T 79/89), 27 February 1992, 1992
ECR 11 315, [1992] 4 CMLR 357; on appeal to ECJ, Commission of the
European Communities v BASF AG and Others (C 137/92 P), 15 June 1994,
[1994] ECR 1 2555 2.2.2.1,7.6.1
PVC II, joined cases, Limburgse Vinyl and Others v Commission (T 305 307,
313,315 316, 318, 325, 328 329, 335/94), 20 April 1999, [1999] ECR II 945,
[1999] 5 CMLR 303; appeal to ECJ, (C 238, 244 245, 247, 250 252/99 P), 15
October 2002, [2002] ECR 1 8375, [2003] 4 CMLR 397, cases joined for the
purposes of the judgment 7.3.3, 7.5, 8.2
Quantel International—Continuum!Quantel SA (92/427/EEC), 27 July 1992, OJ
1992, L235/9, [1993] 5 CMLR 497, [1992] 2 CEC 2,208 2.2.1.1, 8.1.2
Quinine Cartel (Re) (69/240/EEC), 16 July 1969, JO 1969, L192/5, [1969]
CMLR D41, CMR 9313; for appeal see ACF Chemiefarma 8.2, 8.2.4
Radio Tele/is Eireann—see Magill.
RAIIUNITEL~Re Unitel Film und Fernseh Produktionsgesellschaft mbH
Co (78/516/EEC), 26 May 1978, OJ 1978, L157/39, [1978] 3 CMLR 306,
CMR 10054 2.2.1.2.3, 7.4.1
RanklSopelem—Re the Agreements of Societe d'Optique Precision,
Electronique et Mecanique and Rank Precision Industries Ltd (75/76/EEC),
20 December 1974, OJ 1975, L29/20, [1975] 1 CMLR D72, CMR 9707 13.8.2
Reiff Bundesanstaltfurden Guterfernverkehr (C 185/91), 17 November 1993,
[1993] ECR 1 5801, [1995] 5 CMLR 145 6.1.4
Remia BVand Verenigde Bedrijven Nutricia v Commission (42/84), 11 July
1985, [1985] ECR 2545, [1987] 1 CMLR 1, CMR 14217 8.1.2,14.1.2.1
xliv TABLE OF CASES
Rennet Stremsel v Commission (61/80), 25 March 1981, [1981] ECR 851,
[1982] 1 CMLR 240, CMR 8709 9.6.1.3,13.2.5
ReuterlBASF(76/743/EEC), 26 July 1976, OJ 1976, L254/40, [1976] 2 CMLR
D44, CMR 9862 2.2.1.2.3
Reynolds v Commission—see BAT v Commission.
Rhone Poulenc v Commission—see Polypropylene.
Rich Products/Jus Rol(HIU3IEEC, IV/31.206), 22 December 1987, OJ 1988
L69/21,[1981]4CMLR527, CCH 10,925 H.3
Roquette Freres v Director General for Competition (C 94/00), 22 Oct 2002,
[2002] ECR 1 9011, [2003] 4 CMLR 46 7.4.2
SACEM cases (395/87, 110, 241 242/88), 13 July 1989, [1989] ECR 2565,
[1991] 4 CMLR 248, [1990] 2 CEC 815 and 856; see also Ministere Public v
Tournier (395/87), 13 July 1989, [1989] ECR 2565, [1991] 4 CMLR 248,
[1990] 2 CEC 815, and Lucazeau v SACEM (110/88), 13 July 1989, [1989]
ECR 2811, [1991] 4 CMLR 248, [1990] 2 CEC 856 2.2.4.2, 5.3.1, 11.9
SAFCO—Re the Societe Anonyme de Fabricants de Conserves Alimentaires
(72/23/EEC), 16 December 1971, JO 1972, L13/44, [1972] CMLR D83,
CMR 9492 13.2.5
Salonia v Poidomani (126/80), 16 June 1981, [1981] ECR 1563, [1982] 1 CMLR
64, CMR 8758 8.1.3, 8.3,9.4
Sandoz Prodotti Farmaceutici SpA v Commission (C 277/87), 11 January 1990,
[1990] ECR 1 45 2.2.2.2
Schneider!Legrand(T 3WIQX), 22 October 2002, [2002] ECR 11 4071, [2003] 4
CMLR 768 1.4.3.2, 2.2.2.3,12.4.2, 14.1.1
Scholler Lebensmittel GmbH Co KG and Langnese (93/405 and 406/EEC), 23
December 1992, OJ 1993, L183/19, [1994] 4 CMLR 51, [1993] 2 CEC 2,101
2.4.4.7, 3.1.2.1,14.1.2
Sea LinklB I Holy head (IV/34.174), interim measures, 11 June 1992, [1992] 5
CMLR 255 4.3.6, 5.2.4.5
SEP (C 36/92 P), 19 May 1994, [1994] ECR 1 1911 7.4.1
Shell v Commission (Polypropylene) (T ll/89), 10 March 1992, [1992] ECR
11 757 2.2.4.2, 7.5.1
SHVIChevron—Re the Application of Steenkolen Handelsvereeniging NVand
Chevron Oil Europe Inc (75/95/EEC), 20 December 1974, OJ 1975, L38/14,
[1975] I CMLR D68, CMR 9709 12.2.2
Syfait ami Others v Glaxowellcome (C 53/03), [2003] 4 CMLR 925, reference
from Greek competition authority; Opinion Jacobs, 28 October 2004 . 1.3.2.1,
2.2.2.2, 2.3.1, 5.2,5.2.2, 5.2.2.4,5.2.5.5.2,14.1.4,14.2.4
Sigma Tecnologie v Commission (T 28/99), 20 March 2002, [2002] ECR
11 1845 2.2.2.1
Silhouette Internationale Schmied GmbH Co KC v Hartlauer Handellshaft
mbh (C 355/96), 16 July 1998, [1998] ECR 1 4799, [1998] 2 CMLR 953
[1998] CEC 676 ' 10.6
Sirena Sri v Eda Sri (40/70), 18February 1971, [1971] ECR 69, [1971] CMLR
260, CMR 8101 10.4.4
SMM T Exhibition Agreement (83/666/EEC, IV/27.492), 5 December 1983
OJ 1983, L376/1, [1984] 1 CMLR 611, CMR 552 2.2.3, 2.3.2 ;
|
t
TABLE OF CASES xlv
Societe de Vente de Ciments et Bitons de I'Est SA v Kerpen Kerpen GmbH
Co KG (319/82), 14 December 1983, [1983] ECR 4173, CMR 14043 2.3.2
Societe La Technique Miniere v Maschinenbau Ulm GmbH (56/65), 30 June
1966, [1966] ECR 235, [1966] CMLR 357, CMR 8047 1.2.1, 1.5.2, 2.4, 2.4.3,
2.4.4, 2.4.4.2, 2.4.4.2.1, 2.4.4.7, 2.5, 7.3.4.1, 8.1.3, 9.3,
11.2,14.1.2,14.1.2.1,14.2.1
Soda Ash—Sohay et Cie v Commission (90/299 300/EEC), 19 December
1990, OJ 1991, L152/21 and 40, [1994] 4 CMLR 645, [1991] 2 CEC 2,028
and 2,053; appeals from this decision were formal; Commission v ICI
fC 286/95 P) and Commission v Solvay (C 287/95 P and 288/95 P), 6 April
2000, [2000] ECR 1 2341 and 2391, [2000] 5 CMLR 413 and 454 5.2.2.1,
5.2.2.4, 7.5.3, 7.6.3
Solvay SA v Commission (T 32/91), 29 une 1995, [1995] ECR 11 1775, [1996]
CEC 196 5.2.2.1, 5.2.2.4, 7.5.3
Spanish Banks—Direction General de Defensa de la Competencia v Association
Espaha de la Banco Privada (AEB) and Others (C 67/91), 16 July 1992,
[1992] ECR 1 4785 7.3.3
SPAR—Re Intergroup Trading BK(75/482/EEC), 14 July 1975, OJ 1975,
L212/23, [1975] 2 CMLR D14, CMR 9759 8.1.3, 8.2.3, 13.2.5
SSI—Stichting Sigarettenindustrie v Commission (240 242, 261, 262, 268
269/82), 10 December 1985, [1985] ECR 3831, [1987] 3 CMLR 661, CMR
14265 8.1.3
Stergios Delimitis—see Delimitis (Stergios).
Stremsel v Commission—see Rennet.
Sugar Cartel—Re the European Sugar Cartel: Cooperative Vereniging Suiker
Unie' UA v Commission (40 48, 50, 54 56, 111 113 14/73), 16 December
1975, [1975] ECR 1663, [1976] 1 CMLR 295, CMR 8334 . 2.2.1.1, 2.2.4.2, 2.4.6
4.3.6,5.1,5.2.2.1.1,9.7.1
Suiker Unie—see Sugar Cartel.
Syfait—Synetairismos Fannakopoion Aitolias Akarnanias (Syfait) and Ors.
V Glxosmithkline AEVE (C 53/03), May 31 2005, [2005] ECR 1 4609,
[2005] 5 CMLR 7 8.6
T MobilelTele.ring M3916, IP/06/535 12.3.2
TAA( Trans Atlantic Agreement) —Atlantic Container Line AB and others v
Commission (T 395/94), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR 11 875, [2002] 4
CMLR 1008; appeal from Trans Atlantic Agreement (94/980/EC,
IV/34.446), 19 October 1994, OJ 1994, L 376/1 4.3.1.1
TACA—Trans Atlantic Conference Agreement (1999/243/EC, 1V/35.134), 16
September 1998, OJ 1999, L95/1, [1999] CEC 2,294 (withdrew immunity
from fines); on appeal, Atlantic Container Line A Band others v Commission
(T 18/97), 28 February 2002, [2002] ECR II 1125, [2002] 4 CMLR 1232,
TACA—Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission (T 191
212 214/98), September 30 2003, OJ 2004, C7/29, [2003] ECR 11 3275 . 4.3.4.3
Tate Lyle, British Sugar, Napier Brown v Commission—see British Sugar.
Telemarketing—Centre Beige d'Etudes du Marche Telemarketing SA (CBEM)
v Compagnie Luxembourgeoise de Telediffusion (311/84), 3 October 1985,
[1985] ECR 3261, [1986] 2 CMLR 558, CMR 14246 5.2.3.4.2,5.2.2.5.2
xlvi TABLE OF CASES
TelialTelenorlSchibsted(\VI}V\),21 May 1998, OJ 1999, C220/28, [1999] 4
CMLR 216, Merger Reporter B721bis, p 4186.25 13.2.2.1
Telia/Telenor (2001/98/EC, IV/M.1439), 13 October 1999, OJ 2001, L40/1,
[2001] CMLR 1226, [2001] CEC 2,283 13.2.2.1
Tepea BVv Commission (28/77), 20 June 1978, [1978] ECR 1391, [1978] 3
CMLR 392, CMR 8467 2.3.2
Tetra Laval BV v Commission (T 5/02), 25 October 2002, [2002] ECR II 4381,
[2002] 5 CMLR 1182; on appeal. Commission v. Tetra Laval BV.(C \3IO3)
15 February 2005, [2005] 1 1113 2.2.2.3,12.4.2,12.6.1, 12.7.2, 14.1.1
Tetra Pak /(88/501/EEC), 26 July 1988, OJ 1988, L272/27, [1990] 4 CMLR 47,
CMR 11015; on appeal Tetra Pak Rawing SA v Commission (T 51/89), 10
July 1990, [1990] ECR 11 309, [1991] 4 CMLR 334, [1990] 2 CEC 409 1.2,
3.1.2.1, 3.1.2.2, 5.1.1, 5.2.7.4, 5.3.3, 9.6,13.2.3
Tetra Pak II—Elopak Italia Sri v Tetra Pak (92/163/EEC), 24 July 1991, OJ
1991, L72/1, [1992] 4 CMLR 551, [1992] 1 CEC 2,145; on appeal Tetra Pak
Rousing SA v Commission (No 2) (T 83/91), 6 October 1994, [1994] ECR
11 755, [1997] 4 CMLR 726, [1995] 1 CEC 34 (CFI); Tetra Pak International
SA v EC Commission (C 333/94 P), 14 November 1996, [1996] ECR 1 5951,
[1997] 4 CMLR 662, [1997] CEC 186 (ECJ) 4.3.7,4.3.9,5.1.1, 5.2, 5.2.2.2,
5.2.3,5.2.3.1.1,5.2.3.4.3,5.2.3.4.4,5.2.3.5,5.2.2.5.2,5.2.6.2,
5.2.6.2.1,5.2.6.4,5.3.3,5.4,7.5.5,8.5,14.1.5.2,14.2.4
Tetra Pak International SAIAlfa Laval AB (91/535/EEC, IV/M.068), 19 July
1991, OJ 1991, L290/35, [1992] 4 CMLR M81, [1991] 2 CEC 2,203, Merger
Reporter B37, p 261 4.3.7
Thetford Corporation v Fiamma SpA (35/87), 30 June 1988, [1988] ECR 3585,
[1988] 3 CMLR 549, CMR 14497 5.2.5.5.3,10.4.2
Tierce Ladbroke v Commission (T 504/93), June 12 1997, [1997] ECR 11 923,
[1997] 5 CMLR 309, [1997] CEC 812; there are several cases of Ladbroke v
Commission: the appeal has been withdrawn 4.3.1.1, 5.2.5.3,10.4.1
Transocean Marine Paint—Re the Transocean Marine Paint Association (No 1)
(67/454/EEC), 27 June 1967, JO 1967, L163/10, [1967] CMLR D9 . . . 7.5.2, 8.6.1
Transocean Marine Paint II—Transocean Marine Paint Association v
Commission (17/74), 23 October 1974, [1974] ECR 1063, [1974] 2 CMLR
459, CMR 8241 7.5.2
Trefileurope Sales SARL v Commission (T 141/89), 6 April 1995, [1995] ECR
H 791 13.8.3
UIP~Re the Application of United International Pictures SF(89/467/EEC),
12 July 1989, OJ 1989, L226/25, [1990] 4 CMLR 749, [1989] 2 CEC 2,019 . . 8.2.3,
13.2.5
UIP II, OJ 1999, C205/6, [1999] 5 CMLR 732 8.2.4
United Brands Company (Re) (76/353/EEC), 17 December 1975, OJ 1976,
L95/1, [1976] 1 CMLR D28, CMR 9800; on appeal United Brands
Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission (27/76), 14
February 1978, [1978] ECR 207, [1978] 1 CMLR 429, CMR 8429.'. 1.3.3.1,4.3,
4.3.1.1,4.3.1.2,4.3.4,4.3.4.1.1,4.3.4.3,5.1,5.1.1,5.2.4.3,5.3.1,5.4,5.6,7.4.1
United Kingdom Agricultural Tractor Registration Exchange (92/157/EEC), 17
February 1992, OJ 1992, L68/19, [1993] 4 CMLR 358, [1992] 1 CEC 2,126;
appeal, see Deere (John) 8.2.2
TABLE OF CASES xlvii
Vaessen BVv Moris and Alex Moris Pvba (79/86/EEC), 10 January 1979, OJ
1979, L19/32, [1979] 1 CMLR 511, CMR 10107 5.2.3.1.2, 8.5
VAG France SA v Etablissements Magne SA (10/86), 18 December 1986, [1986]
ECR 4071, [1988] 4 CMLR 98, CMR 14,390 3.1.2.3
Van den Bergh Foods Ltd (98/531/EC, IV/34.073), 11 March 1998, OJ 1998,
L246/1, [1998] 5 CMLR 530, [1998] CEC 2,380 ; on appeal Van den
Bergh Foods Ltd v Commission (T 65/98), 23 October 2003, [2003] ECR
11 4653, [2004] 4 CMLR 14, appeal to ECJ, Unilever Bestfoods (Ireland)
Ltd. C 552/03 P, 28 September 2006 . . . 5.2.2.1.3, 5.2.2.4, 5.2.7.1, 9.1.2, 9.7, 7.3.4,
14.1.5.4
Van Doren Q GmbH v Lifestyle Sportswear Handelsgesellschaft mbH
(C 244/00), April 8, 2003, [2003] ECR 1 3051, [2003] 2 CMLR 203,
(Competition Law Insight, part 6, onus on party relying on exhaustion
unless real risk of market partitioning) 10.6
Van Eycke Pascal v ASPA NV(2( 1IU), 21 September 1988, [1988] ECR 4769,
[1990] 4 CMLR 330, [1990] 1 CEC 293 6.1.4
Van Schijndel v Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Fysotherapeuten (C 430 431/93),
14 December 1995, [1995] ECR 1 4705, [1996] 1 CMLR 801, [1996] CEC
240 7.2
Van Zuylen Freres v Hag AG (192/73), 3 July 1974, [1974] ECR 731, [1974] 2
CMLR 127, CMR 8230 10.4.4
Vegetable Parchment—The Community v Members of the Genuine Vegetable
Parchment Association (78/252/EEC), 23 December 1977, OJ 1978, L70/54,
[1978] 1 CMLR 534, CMR 10016 8.2.2
Velcro SA v Aplix SA (85/410/EEC), 12 July 1985, OJ 1985, L233/22, [1985] 4
CMLR 157, CMR 10719 11.1,14.1.2
Verband der Sachversicherer v Commission—see Fire Insurance.
Vereeniging van Cementhandelaren v Commission (8/72), 17 October 1972,
[1972] ECR 977, [1973] CMLR 7, CMR 8179 2.2.3, 2.3.2
Vichy (91/153/EEC, IV/31.624), 11 January 1991, OJ 1991, L75/57; appeal
Societe d'Hygiene de Vichy v Commission (T 19/91), order of the CFI
regarding application for interim measures, 7 June 1991, [1991] ECR
11 265, [1994] 1 CEC 318, judgment, 27 February 1992, [1992] ECR 11 415 . 9.4,
14.1.2
Viho v Commission (C 73/95 P), 24 October 1996, [1996] ECR 1 5457, [1997] 4
CMLR 419 2.2.1.1
Villeroy Boch KG and Villeroy Boch Sari (Re the Agreements of)
(85/616/EEC), 16 December 1985, OJ 1985, L376/15, [1988] 4 CMLR 461,
CMR 10758 9.4
Virgin!British Airways—see British Airways.
VISA (COMP/D1/29.373), 14 October 2000, OJ 2000, C293/18, [2000] 5
CMLR 1067. (Article 19(3) notice) 1.3.3.2.4
Vitamins—see Hoffmann La Roche.
Vlaamse Reisburos—see Belgian Travel Agents.
Volk v Ets Vervaecke Spr/(5/69), 9 July 1969, [1969] ECR 295, [1969] CMLR
273, CMR 8074 2.4.6, 8.6
Volkswagen (98/273/EC, IV/35.733), 28 January 1998, OJ 1998, L124/60, [1998]
5 CMLR 33, [1998] CEC 2,189; on appeal Volkswagen v Commission
xlviii TABLE OF CASES
(T 62/98), 6 July 2000, [2000] ECR 11 2707, [2000] 5 CMLR 853; in ECJ
(C 338/OO P), 18 September 2003, [2003] ECR I 9189, [2004] 4 CMLR 351,
para 60 69 on unilateral act L7, 2.2.2.2
Volkswagen Passat (2001/71 I/EC, COMP/F 2/36.693), 29 June 2001, OJ 2001,
L 262/14, [2001] 5 CMLR 1309, [2001] CEC 2,726; on appeal Volkswagen
AG v Commission (T 208/01), 3 December 2003, [2003] ECR 11 5141. [2004]
4 CMLR 727; on appeal C 74/04 P, 13 July 2006, [[2006] ECR I 6585 . 2.2.2.2
Volvo AB v Erik Veng ( UK) Ltd (238/87), 5 October 1988, [1988] ECR 6211,
[1989] 4 CMLR 122, CMR 14498 5.2.5.1, 5.2.5.5.2
WANADOO (COMP 38.233), 16 July 2003, Press Release IP/03/1025, [2005] 5
CMLR 120; on appeal by Wanadoo (T 340/03), 2 October 2003, OJ 2003,
C289/34, 30 January 2007, Appeal lodged, (C 202/07). Michal Gal,
'Below Cost Price Alignment: Meeting or Beating Competition, The
France Telecom Case,' [2007] ECLR 382.
France v. Commission C289/34,. 5.2.6, 5.2.6.2.1, 5.2.6.4, 5.6, 12.4.3,14.1.5.2,14.2.4
WANO Schwarzpulver GmbH (Re) (78/92I/EEC), 20 October 1978, OJ 1978,
L322/26, [1979] 1 CMLR 403, CMR 10089 8.6.1, 13.2.2
Warner Bros and Metronome v Christiansen (158/86), 17 May 1988, [1988]
ECR 2605, CMR 14497 10.4.2
Whitbread (99/230/EC, IV/35.079/F3), 24 February 1999, OJ 1999, L88/26,
[1999] 5 CMLR 118; appeal Shaw and Falla v Commission (T 131/99), 21
March 2002, [2002] ECR 11 2023, [2002] 5 CMLR 81 2.4.4.7
White Lead—The Community v Associated Lead Manufacturers Ltd
(79/90/EEC), 12 December 1978, OJ 1979, L21/16, [1979] 1 CMLR 464,
CMR 10111 8.2.5
Wilhelm (Walt) v Bundeskartellamt (14/68), 13 February 1969, [1969] ECR 1,
[1969] CMLR 100, CMR 8056 2.3.1, 6.1.3
Windsurfing International Inc v Commission (193/83), 25 February 1986, [1986]
ECR 611, [1986] 3 CMLR 489, CMR 14271; appeal from Commission
decision Windsurfing International (%31400/EEC, IV/29.395), 11 July 1983,
OJ 1983, L229/1, [1984] 1 CMLR 1 2.3.3, 2.4.4.2.1
Wood Pulp (Re) (85/202/EEC), 19 December 1984, OJ 1985, L85/1, [1985] 3
CMLR 474, CMR 10654.
Wood Pulp—A Ahlstrom OY and Others v Commission (C 89, 104, 114, 116,
117 125 129/85), judgment on extraterritoriality, 2 7 September 1988,
[1988] ECR 5193, [1988] 4 CMLR 901, CMR 11026, [1989] 4 CMLR 22,
CMR 14491; judgment on concerted practices, 31 March 1993, [1993] ECR
1 1307, [1993] 4 CMLR 407, [1993] 1 CEC 466 1.6, 1.6.1, 2.2.4.2, 4.3.1.2
WorldCom/MCI (99/2S1/EC, IV/M.1069), 8 July 1998, OJ 1999, LI 16/1, [1999]
5 CMLR 876, [1999] CEC 2,440 12.2.5
Wouters, Sarelbergh and Price Waterhouse v Algemene Raad Van de
Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten (C 309/99), 19 February 2002, [2002] ECR
1 1577, [2002] 4 CMLR 913, [2002] CEC 250 1.3.2.7, 2.2.1.2.3, 2.4.3, 2.4.4.3,
6.1.4, 6.2.1.4,13.2.1.3.2,14.1.2.1
Yves Saint Laurent—see Parfums Yves Saint Laurent.
Zanussi—Re the Guarantee Given by Industrie A Zanussi SpA (78/922/EEC), 23
October 1978, OJ 1978, L322/26, [1979] 1 CMLR 81, CMR 10090 8.6.1
Zuchner (172/80), 14 July 1981, [1981] ECR 2021, [1982] 1 CMLR 313 2.3.3
1
TABLE OF CASES il
II. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Stenuit v France (A/232) (1992) 14 EHRR 509 7.5.1
Franz Fischer v Austria, 29 May 2001, application No 37950/97, EctHR 7.3.3
III. AUSTRALIA
Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Pty Ltd (1988) 83 ALR 577,
comment Korah (2000) 32 Victoria University of Wellington Law Rev 231,
233 etseq, Hanks Williams (1990) 17 Melbourne ULR 437 5.2.5.2
IV. FRANCE
Consten Grundig, [1963] CMLR 176 2.4.1
SACEM, Conseil de la Concurrence (France), Avis 93 A 05, 20 April 1993 5.3.1
V. GERMANY
Hoffmann La Roche, WuW/E (BGH) 1445 (1976) 5.3.1
Vitamin B12, WuW/E (BGH) 1435 (1976) 5.3.1
VI. IRELAND
Masterfoods v HB Ice Cream, [1992] 3 CMLR 830 7.3.4
VII. UNITED KINGDOM
Better Care, [2002] Comp AR 226 2.2.1.2.2
Chemidus Wavin Ltd v Soc pour la Transformation et I Exploitation des Resines
lndustrielles SA, [1977] FSR 181, [1978] 3 CMLR 514.
Cigarette Filter Rods, Report of Monopolies Commission on the Supply and
Export of, 23 July 1969, H.C.P. 335 4.3.4.1.2
Colgate Palmolive Ltd. v Markwell Finance, [1988] R.P.C. 283 (Ch.D.), [1989]
R.P.C. 497 (C.A.).
Concrete Roofing Tiles, Report of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission
on the Supply in the United Kingdom of, 1981, H.C. 120. Courage v Crehan
No 1, [1999] ECC 455, [1999] UKCLR 110, 1999 WL 477317 5.2.6
Courage v Crehan No 2, [1999] UKCLR 407, 1999 WL 1071341 7.2
Garden Cottage Foods v Milk Marketing Board, [1984] AC 130, [1983] 3 WLR
143, [1983] 2 All ER 770, [1983] 3 CMLR 43, reversing [1982] QB 1114
(CA) 7.2
Gibbs Mew Pic v. Graham Gemmell, July 22 1988, Q.Ben I, 98/0096/1. CA.
[1999] ECC 97, [1998] EuLR 588, 606(see Courage v Crehan, C 453/99) 7.3.4
Holleran v Thwaites, [1989] 2 CMLR 917, see E.C.C.
Iberian v BHP, [1996] 2 CMLR 601 (Ch.D.), Laddie J 7.3.4
1 TABLE OF CASES
Levi Strauss v Tesco, UK High Court, Chancery Division, Pumfrey J, Pumfrey
J., 31 July 2002, [2002] 3 CMLR 281.
Metal Containers, Report of the Monopolies Commission on the Supply of,
1970, H.C.P 6.
Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited Subsidiairies v Director General oj Fair
Trading, 15 Jan 2002, [2002] UKCLR 726, [2002] 4 All ER 376, 2002 WL
820135 4.3.9
Westinghouse Electric Corp Uranium Contract Litigation (In Re), MDL
Docket 235, [1978] AC 547, [1978] 1 CMLR 100 (H.L.) 1 5.2
VII. UNITED STATES
Brook Group Ltd v Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp, 409 US 209, 125 L Ed
2d 168, 113 SCt 2578 (1993) 5.2.6.2.1
Brunswick Corp v Pueblo Bowl O Mat, 429 US 477, 97 SCt 690, 50 L Ed 2d
701 7.3.4
Cellophane—US v El du Pont De Nemours Co, 351 US 377 (1956), 100 L Ed
1264, 76 SCt 994 4.3.2
Continental TV Inc v GTE Sylvania Inc, 433 US 36, 53 L Ed 2d 568, 97 SCt
2549, (1977); on remand to Californian CA, 694 F 2d 1132 (1982), 1982 2
Trade Cas (CCH) P64, 962 8.1.3
Eastman Kodak Co v Image Technical Services Inc, 504 US 451, 119 L Ed 2d
265,112 SCt 2072 (1992) 4.3.3
Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist No 2 v Hyde, 466 US 2, 104 SCt 1551, 80 L Ed
2d 2 (1984) 5.2.3.5
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co v Zenith Radio Corporation, 475 US 574, 89
L Ed 2d 538,106 SCt 1348 (1986) 5.2.6.2.1
Monsanto v Spray Rite Service Corp, 465 US 752, 79 L Ed 2d 775£ "104 SCt
1464 (1984) 2.2.2.2
Professional Real Estate Investors v Columbia Pictures Industries, 508 US 49,
123 L Ed 2d 611, 113 SCt 1920 (1993), litigation started in good faith not
monopolization 5.2.7.2
Rothery Storage Van Co v Atlas Van Lines, Inc, 792 F.2d 210 (DC Cir 1986) . . 8.1.3
US v Addyston Pipe Steel Co, 85 F 271 (CA 6th Cir 1898) 8.1.1
US v Penn Olin Chemical Co, 378 US 158, 12 L Ed 2d 775, 84 SCt 1710, 775
(1964) 13.2.1
US v Topco Association Inc, 405 US 596, 131 L Ed 2d 515, 92 SCt 1126 (1972). . 8.1.3 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Korah, Valentine |
| author_GND | (DE-588)132368080 |
| author_facet | Korah, Valentine |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Korah, Valentine |
| author_variant | v k vk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022615156 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJE6456 |
| callnumber-raw | KJE6456 |
| callnumber-search | KJE6456 |
| callnumber-sort | KJE 46456 |
| classification_rvk | PS 3360 |
| classification_tum | JUR 395f |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255747732 (DE-599)BVBBV022615156 |
| dewey-full | 343.240721 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 343 - Military, tax, trade & industrial law |
| dewey-raw | 343.240721 |
| dewey-search | 343.240721 |
| dewey-sort | 3343.240721 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 9. ed. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02010nam a2200493 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022615156</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20120824 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070820s2007 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781841137544</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-84113-754-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255747732</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022615156</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE6456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">343.240721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3360</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139766:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JUR 395f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Korah, Valentine</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132368080</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice</subfield><subfield code="c">Valentine Korah</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9. ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LVII, 539 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Gemeinschaften</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35439-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antitrust law</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Competition, Unfair</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Restraint of trade</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121924-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121924-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Gemeinschaften</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35439-9</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121924-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015821303&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015821303</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| geographic_facet | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| id | DE-604.BV022615156 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T18:17:54Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:01:43Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781841137544 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015821303 |
| oclc_num | 255747732 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-703 DE-29 DE-384 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 DE-188 DE-739 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-703 DE-29 DE-384 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 DE-188 DE-739 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
| physical | LVII, 539 S. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Hart |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Korah, Valentine Verfasser (DE-588)132368080 aut An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice Valentine Korah 9. ed. Oxford [u.a.] Hart 2007 LVII, 539 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Gemeinschaften (DE-588)35439-9 gnd rswk-swf Antitrust law European Union countries Competition, Unfair European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 s DE-604 Europäische Gemeinschaften (DE-588)35439-9 b 1\p DE-604 HBZ Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015821303&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Korah, Valentine An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäische Gemeinschaften (DE-588)35439-9 gnd Antitrust law European Union countries Competition, Unfair European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)35439-9 (DE-588)4121924-7 |
| title | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice |
| title_auth | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice |
| title_exact_search | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice |
| title_exact_search_txtP | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice |
| title_full | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice Valentine Korah |
| title_fullStr | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice Valentine Korah |
| title_full_unstemmed | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice Valentine Korah |
| title_short | An introductory guide to EC competition law and practice |
| title_sort | an introductory guide to ec competition law and practice |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäische Gemeinschaften (DE-588)35439-9 gnd Antitrust law European Union countries Competition, Unfair European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Europäische Gemeinschaften Antitrust law European Union countries Competition, Unfair European Union countries Restraint of trade European Union countries Wettbewerbsrecht Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015821303&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT korahvalentine anintroductoryguidetoeccompetitionlawandpractice |