European human rights law: text and materials
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Oxford Univ. Press.
2008
|
| Ausgabe: | 3. ed. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | LVI, 957 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780199277469 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022552962 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20091008 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 070810s2008 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780199277469 |9 978-0-19-927746-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)173502774 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022552962 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-12 |a DE-739 |a DE-19 |a DE-703 |a DE-521 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 |a DE-355 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJC5132 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.408/5 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PS 4080 |0 (DE-625)139832: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Janis, Mark W. |d 1947- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)123992966 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a European human rights law |b text and materials |c Mark W. Janis ; Richard S. Kay ; Anthony W. Bradley |
| 250 | |a 3. ed. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Oxford Univ. Press. |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a LVI, 957 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europarat |b Kommission für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)37220-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 630 | 0 | 4 | |a Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms |d (1950) |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention |f 1950 November 4 |0 (DE-588)4015727-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Europese conventie tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Mensenrechten |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Menschenrecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human rights |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human rights |z Europe |v Cases | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Menschenrecht |0 (DE-588)4074725-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Europa (geografie) |2 gtt | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Menschenrecht |0 (DE-588)4074725-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention |f 1950 November 4 |0 (DE-588)4015727-1 |D u |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |D b |
| 689 | 2 | 1 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 2 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 3 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 2 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 3 | 0 | |a Europarat |b Kommission für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)37220-1 |D b |
| 689 | 3 | |8 2\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kay, Richard S. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bradley, Anthony W. |d 1934- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)128433442 |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015759253&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 883 | 1 | |8 2\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015759253 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820135751144177664 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Titel: European human rights law
Autor: Janis, Mark W.
Jahr: 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface vii
A Note on Citation xi
Acknowledgements xxiii
Table of Cases before the European Commission of Human Rights xxv
Table of Cases before the European Court of Human Rights xxvi
Table of Cases from the United States xl
Table of Cases from Canada xlv
Table of Cases from the United Kingdom xlvii
Table of Other Cases \
Table of Statutes li
Table of International Instruments lv
PART I THE CONVENTION AND THE COURT
1 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 3
A. Human rights law 4
B. The negotiation of the Convention 12
C. The progress of the Convention 19
2 Strasbourg's legal machinery 24
A. The European Commission of Human Rights: 1953-1999 24
B. Admissibility 27
1. Earl Spencer's case 30
2. Exhaustion of domestic remedies 36
3. The Icelandic Electoral System case 38
4. Manifestly ill-founded 41
5. The Bankovic case 42
6. Strasbourg's jurisdiction 47
C. Friendly settlement 49
1. The Giama case 50
2. Negotiations at Strasbourg 55
D. Fact-finding 57
1. The Greek case 57
2. Shame at Strasbourg 65
3 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 69
A. The constitution of the Court 70
B. The role of the Court 74
1. The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom 76
2. Acceptance of the Court 84
C. Remedies 89
1. Barthold v. Germany 89
2. Remedies at Strasbourg 98
D. The efficacy of the Court 103
1. Measuring efficacy 103
2. Efficacy and legitimacy 109
3. Strasbourg and the efficacy of international law 111
PART II SUBSTANTIVE ADJUDICATION IN THE COURT
4 THE RIGHT TO LIFE 119
A. When does 'life' begin? 120
1. Vo v.France 120
2. The extent of Article 2 128
B. State obligations under Article 2 130
1. Gulv. Turkey 131
2. Excessive use offeree 136
3. Defects in planning and control 138
a. McCann and Others v. United Kingdom 138
b. Judicial review of public safety decisions 146
4. The duty to investigate 147
a. R. (Amin) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 147
b. The need for an investigation 152
C. Positive obligations to protect life 153
1. Edwards v. United Kingdom 154
2. The extent of the obligations 159
D. The death penalty 161
E. Fact-finding in the European Court of Human Rights 163
5 TORTURE; INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT
OR PUNISHMENT; AND SLAVERY 168
A. Defining the terms 170
1. Ireland v. United Kingdom 170
2. Peers v. Greece 178
3. Judicial distinctions 181
4. Fact-finding under Article 3 192
5. Comparisons 194
6. The United Nations Convention and the use of torture in
interrogation 202
B. Corporal punishment 206
1. Tyrer v. United Kingdom 206
2. Degrading treatment 209
3. Public opinion 213
C. Extradition, expulsion or deportation 215
1. The responsibility of the deporting state 215
2. D. v. United Kingdom 220
3. The U.N. Refugee Convention 226
D. The death penalty 227
E. Article 4: Slavery and forced labour 230
6 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION; ASSOCIATION 234
A. Introduction 235
B. Justifying limits on expression 236
1. Handyside v. United Kingdom 237
2. The justification of interferences with Convention rights 242
a. Proportionality and the margin of appreciation 242
b. Comparisons 244
c. Levels of justification 249
d. The protection of morals and the relativity of value 249
e. Maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary 252
f. The nature of the violation 253
3. Comparisons 253
C. Categories of expression 256
1. Political expression 256
a. Lingens v. Austria 256
b. Barfod v. Denmark 260
c. The special protection of political expression and the press 262
d. Free expression and the judicial process 264
3. Freedom of expression and protection against defamation 268
a. Defamation and matters of public interest 268
b. Free expression and the protection of privacy 271
c. Falsehoods and statements of opinion 274
d. Sanctions for defamation 276
4. Freedom of expression and national security 278
5. Hate speech and blasphemy 282
a. Witzsch v. Germany 282
b. Giniewski v. France 284
6. Commercial speech 290
a. Markt Intern and Beermann v. Germany 290
b. Comparisons 296
7. Artistic expression 300
8. Broadcasting 301
D. Expression and public employment 305
E. Interferences 'prescribed by law' 309
F. Prior restraints 313
G. Article 11: Freedom of association 314
7 FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION 323
A. The landmark judgment 323
1. Kokkinakis v. Greece 323
2. Waiting for Article 9 333
B. The definition of'religion' 335
1. Buscarini v. San Marino 335
2. Pretty v. United Kingdom 337
3. The failure to define 338
C. The freedom to manifest one's religion 340
1. Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria 340
2. Article 10 or Article 9? 347
3. Refah Partisi (Welfare Party) v. Turkey 348
4. Murphy v.Ireland 356
5. Sahin v. Turkey 362
6. Religious preferences? 368
7. An American comparison 371
8 RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE; MARRIAGE 373
A. The scope of family and private life 373
B. Family life 375
1. Johnston v. Ireland 375
2. The definition of the family 380
3. Positive obligations 389
a. X and Y v. The Netherlands 389
b. The reach of positive obligations 391
4. Aspects of family life 403
a. The home 403
b. Language rights 405
c. Immigration and deportation 407
d. Giil v. Switzerland 411
e. Parental rights 417
C. Private life 421
1. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom 421
2. The definition of'private life' 426
3. Private acts and the protection of morals 428
4. Private life and sexual preferences 430
5. Privacy rights and abortion 435
D. Private life and personal identity 437
1. Sexual identity 437
a. Christine Goodwin v. United Kingdom 437
b. Personal identity and gender re-assignment 442
2. Article 12 and the right to marry 443
a. Christine Goodwin v. United Kingdom 443
b. Restrictions on marriage 445
3. Personal identity and choice of name 447
E. Public disclosure or investigation of private information 448
9 THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM FROM DISCRIMINATION 457
A. The 'parasitic' quality of Article 14 457
1. Abdulaziz v. United Kingdom 458
2. Gaygusuz v. Austria 464
3. R. (Carson) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 466
4. Botta v. Italy 468
B. The protected grounds 470
1. R. (CM and Others) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 471
C. 'Discrimination': the role of comparison 474
1. Fredin v. Sweden 474
2. Van der Mussele v. Belgium 477
3. Loving v. Virginia 481
4. Paulik v. Slovakia 484
D. Indirect discrimination 485
1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 486
2. Thlimmenos v. Greece 488
E. Proving discrimination 489
1. DH and others v. Czech Republic 490
2. Nachova and others v. Bulgaria 493
F. The justification of differential treatment 497
1. Introduction 497
2. Palmore v. Sidoti 500
3. Petrovic v. Austria 503
4. Frette v. France 505
G. 'Positive' discrimination 506
1. Grutter v. Bollinger 508
2. Stec and Others v. United Kingdom 512
H. Protocol 12 516
10 PROPERTY 519
A. Determining whether there has been an 'interference' 521
1. The Court's general approach in property cases 521
2. Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden 521
3. The meaning of 'property' for the purposes of the guarantee 525
4. Interferences with property rights: the three rules 528
a. The first rule: peaceful enjoyment of property 528
b. The second rule: deprivation of property 529
c. The third rule: control over the use of property 529
5. Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland 530
6. Tre Traktorer Aktiebolag v. Sweden 531
7. Gasus Dosier-und Fodertechnik v. Netherlands 533
B. Assessing whether an interference is justified:
legal certainty and the public interest 539
1. The requirement of lawfulness 540
2. Determining the 'general' or 'public' interest for an
interference with property rights 541
3. James and Others v. United Kingdom 542
4. Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece 546
5. Beyeler v.Italy 549
C. Assessing whether an interference is justified: proportionality 553
1. Lithgow and Others v. United Kingdom 555
2. Jahn and Others v. Germany 560
11. THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION 568
A. Introduction 568
B. The Belgian Linguistic case (No. 2) 570
C. Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark 574
D. Campbell and Cosans v. United Kingdom 581
E. Valsamis v. Greece 588
F. Sahin v. Turkey 592
G. Some consequences of the Convention right to education 597
12 THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY OF PERSON 601
A. Introduction 602
1. Kurt v. Turkey 602
2. Cyprus v. Turkey 605
B. Has there been a deprivation of liberty? 610
1. Guzzardi v. Italy 610
2. Engel and Others v. The Netherlands 614
3. H.M. v. Switzerland 618
C. Detention after conviction 621
1. Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium 622
2. Weeks v. United Kingdom 624
3. Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell v. United Kingdom 628
4. Stafford v. United Kingdom 632
D. Detention of mental patients 639
1. Winterwerp v. The Netherlands 639
2. X v. United Kingdom 643
3. Johnson v. United Kingdom 646
E. Other permitted grounds of detention 651
1. Lawful arrest or detention on reasonable suspicion of
having committed an offence 651
a. Loukanov v. Bulgaria 653
b. Steel and Others v. United Kingdom 655
c. Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. United Kingdom 658
d. Jablonski v. Poland g^j
2. Arrest or detention to secure the fulfilment of
an obligation prescribed by law 664
a. Benham v. United Kingdom 664
3. Arrest or detention for the prevention of the
spreading of infectious diseases 666
a. Enhorn v. Sweden 666
4. Arrest or detention to prevent an unauthorized entry into
the country or with a view to deportation or extradition 670
a. Amuur v. France 670
b. Conka v. Belgium 673
c. Chahal v. United Kingdom 677
F. Right to be brought promptly before a judge or other officer
authorized to exercise judicial power 681
1. Who may exercise judicial power for the purposes of Article 5(3)? 681
a. Huber v. Switzerland 682
2. The meaning of'promptly'in Article 5(3) 685
a. Brogan v. United Kingdom 686
G. The right to a decision by a court as to
the legality of detention 690
1. Sanchez-Reisse v. Switzerland 692
2. Bouamar v. Belgium 695
3. Megyeri v. Germany 698
H. The challenge of terrorism and the right of
states to derogate from the Convention 702
1. Lawless v. Republic of Ireland (No. 3) 703
2. The sequel to Brogan v. United Kingdom 706
3. Brannigan v. United Kingdom 706
4. Aksoy v.Turkey 712
5. Habeas corpus in emergency situations 715
13 THE RIGHT TO A FAIR AND PUBLIC HEARING 718
A. Introduction 718
B. Criminal charges and civil rights 720
1. Oztiirk v.Germany 721
2. Benham v. United Kingdom 725
3. When has a criminal charge been determined? 726
4. Do disciplinary and other punitive procedures involve the
determination of criminal charges? 730
5. Campbell and Fells v. United Kingdom 731
6. Civil rights and public rights 738
7. Feldbrugge v. The Netherlands 745
8. Employment in the public service 755
9. Eskelinen v. Finland 756
10. Further aspects of the scope of Article 6(1) 762
C. An independent and impartial tribunal 766
1. Piersack v. Belgium 766
2. The problem of prior involvement 769
3. Sigurdsson v. Iceland 776
4. Objective impartiality 781
5. Independence 783
6. Administrative agencies and disciplinary bodies 787
D. Equality of arms 792
1. Dombo Beheer B.V. v. The Netherlands 793
2. Aspects of equality 797
3. R. (Roberts) v. Parole Board and Another 799
4. The right to confront witnesses 807
5. The right to counsel 812
a. Granger v. United Kingdom 812
E. The requirements of prompt adjudication 816
PART III THE IMPACT OF THE STRASBOURG SYSTEM
14 THE EFFECT IN NATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 829
A. The diverse legal systems in Europe 829
B. The duty of states to give effect to the Convention
in national law 831
1. Does the Convention require states (a) to give direct effect in
national law to the substantive rights protected by the Convention?
and (b) to provide a procedure in national law for enabling
individuals to remedy breaches of those Convention rights? 831
a. Klass v. Germany 834
b. Silver v. United Kingdom g37
c. Chahal v. United Kingdom 842
2. Is it the duty of a state to comply with remedial measures
required following a breach of the Convention? 845
a. Vermeire v. Belgium 845
C. Incorporation of the Convention—the practice of states 849
D. The effect of the Convention in the law of the United Kingdom 854
1. Malone v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner 855
2. R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind 856
3. Giving effect to the Convention in United Kingdom law 859
a. Rights brought home: the Human Rights Bill 859
4. The Human Rights Act 1998 864
5. The duty to interpret legislation in accordance
with the Convention 866
a. Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza 866
6. Judicial review of legislation that is inconsistent
with the Convention 869
a. ,\ v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 869
E. The relation between the Convention and Community law 873
15 PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS 878
A. What to do about case load and coherence? 878
1. The flood of applications 879
2. A victim of its own success? 881
3. Pilot judgments 883
4. Coping with the case load and coherence 884
B. What to do about coverage and compliance? 885
1. Extending the rights protected 885
2. Adding the European Union 886
3. Implementing judgments 889
4. Addressing systemic violations of the Convention 895
5. Improving coverage and compliance 896
APPENDIX A Convention for the Protection of
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 899
APPENDIX B Proposed Protocol 14 to the Convention 927
APPENDIX C The Human Rights Act 1998 (United Kingdom) 934
Index 951 |
| adam_txt |
Titel: European human rights law
Autor: Janis, Mark W.
Jahr: 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface vii
A Note on Citation xi
Acknowledgements xxiii
Table of Cases before the European Commission of Human Rights xxv
Table of Cases before the European Court of Human Rights xxvi
Table of Cases from the United States xl
Table of Cases from Canada xlv
Table of Cases from the United Kingdom xlvii
Table of Other Cases \
Table of Statutes li
Table of International Instruments lv
PART I THE CONVENTION AND THE COURT
1 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 3
A. Human rights law 4
B. The negotiation of the Convention 12
C. The progress of the Convention 19
2 Strasbourg's legal machinery 24
A. The European Commission of Human Rights: 1953-1999 24
B. Admissibility 27
1. Earl Spencer's case 30
2. Exhaustion of domestic remedies 36
3. The Icelandic Electoral System case 38
4. Manifestly ill-founded 41
5. The Bankovic case 42
6. Strasbourg's jurisdiction 47
C. Friendly settlement 49
1. The Giama case 50
2. Negotiations at Strasbourg 55
D. Fact-finding 57
1. The Greek case 57
2. Shame at Strasbourg 65
3 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 69
A. The constitution of the Court 70
B. The role of the Court 74
1. The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom 76
2. Acceptance of the Court 84
C. Remedies 89
1. Barthold v. Germany 89
2. Remedies at Strasbourg 98
D. The efficacy of the Court 103
1. Measuring efficacy 103
2. Efficacy and legitimacy 109
3. Strasbourg and the efficacy of international law 111
PART II SUBSTANTIVE ADJUDICATION IN THE COURT
4 THE RIGHT TO LIFE 119
A. When does 'life' begin? 120
1. Vo v.France 120
2. The extent of Article 2 128
B. State obligations under Article 2 130
1. Gulv. Turkey 131
2. Excessive use offeree 136
3. Defects in planning and control 138
a. McCann and Others v. United Kingdom 138
b. Judicial review of public safety decisions 146
4. The duty to investigate 147
a. R. (Amin) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 147
b. The need for an investigation 152
C. Positive obligations to protect life 153
1. Edwards v. United Kingdom 154
2. The extent of the obligations 159
D. The death penalty 161
E. Fact-finding in the European Court of Human Rights 163
5 TORTURE; INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT
OR PUNISHMENT; AND SLAVERY 168
A. Defining the terms 170
1. Ireland v. United Kingdom 170
2. Peers v. Greece 178
3. Judicial distinctions 181
4. Fact-finding under Article 3 192
5. Comparisons 194
6. The United Nations Convention and the use of torture in
interrogation 202
B. Corporal punishment 206
1. Tyrer v. United Kingdom 206
2. Degrading treatment 209
3. Public opinion 213
C. Extradition, expulsion or deportation 215
1. The responsibility of the deporting state 215
2. D. v. United Kingdom 220
3. The U.N. Refugee Convention 226
D. The death penalty 227
E. Article 4: Slavery and forced labour 230
6 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION; ASSOCIATION 234
A. Introduction 235
B. Justifying limits on expression 236
1. Handyside v. United Kingdom 237
2. The justification of interferences with Convention rights 242
a. Proportionality and the margin of appreciation 242
b. Comparisons 244
c. Levels of justification 249
d. The protection of morals and the relativity of value 249
e. Maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary 252
f. The nature of the violation 253
3. Comparisons 253
C. Categories of expression 256
1. Political expression 256
a. Lingens v. Austria 256
b. Barfod v. Denmark 260
c. The special protection of political expression and the press 262
d. Free expression and the judicial process 264
3. Freedom of expression and protection against defamation 268
a. Defamation and matters of public interest 268
b. Free expression and the protection of privacy 271
c. Falsehoods and statements of opinion 274
d. Sanctions for defamation 276
4. Freedom of expression and national security 278
5. Hate speech and blasphemy 282
a. Witzsch v. Germany 282
b. Giniewski v. France 284
6. Commercial speech 290
a. Markt Intern and Beermann v. Germany 290
b. Comparisons 296
7. Artistic expression 300
8. Broadcasting 301
D. Expression and public employment 305
E. Interferences 'prescribed by law' 309
F. Prior restraints 313
G. Article 11: Freedom of association 314
7 FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION 323
A. The landmark judgment 323
1. Kokkinakis v. Greece 323
2. Waiting for Article 9 333
B. The definition of'religion' 335
1. Buscarini v. San Marino 335
2. Pretty v. United Kingdom 337
3. The failure to define 338
C. The freedom to manifest one's religion 340
1. Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria 340
2. Article 10 or Article 9? 347
3. Refah Partisi (Welfare Party) v. Turkey 348
4. Murphy v.Ireland 356
5. Sahin v. Turkey 362
6. Religious preferences? 368
7. An American comparison 371
8 RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE; MARRIAGE 373
A. The scope of family and private life 373
B. Family life 375
1. Johnston v. Ireland 375
2. The definition of the family 380
3. Positive obligations 389
a. X and Y v. The Netherlands 389
b. The reach of positive obligations 391
4. Aspects of family life 403
a. The home 403
b. Language rights 405
c. Immigration and deportation 407
d. Giil v. Switzerland 411
e. Parental rights 417
C. Private life 421
1. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom 421
2. The definition of'private life' 426
3. Private acts and the protection of morals 428
4. Private life and sexual preferences 430
5. Privacy rights and abortion 435
D. Private life and personal identity 437
1. Sexual identity 437
a. Christine Goodwin v. United Kingdom 437
b. Personal identity and gender re-assignment 442
2. Article 12 and the right to marry 443
a. Christine Goodwin v. United Kingdom 443
b. Restrictions on marriage 445
3. Personal identity and choice of name 447
E. Public disclosure or investigation of private information 448
9 THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM FROM DISCRIMINATION 457
A. The 'parasitic' quality of Article 14 457
1. Abdulaziz v. United Kingdom 458
2. Gaygusuz v. Austria 464
3. R. (Carson) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 466
4. Botta v. Italy 468
B. The protected grounds 470
1. R. (CM and Others) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 471
C. 'Discrimination': the role of comparison 474
1. Fredin v. Sweden 474
2. Van der Mussele v. Belgium 477
3. Loving v. Virginia 481
4. Paulik v. Slovakia 484
D. Indirect discrimination 485
1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 486
2. Thlimmenos v. Greece 488
E. Proving discrimination 489
1. DH and others v. Czech Republic 490
2. Nachova and others v. Bulgaria 493
F. The justification of differential treatment 497
1. Introduction 497
2. Palmore v. Sidoti 500
3. Petrovic v. Austria 503
4. Frette v. France 505
G. 'Positive' discrimination 506
1. Grutter v. Bollinger 508
2. Stec and Others v. United Kingdom 512
H. Protocol 12 516
10 PROPERTY 519
A. Determining whether there has been an 'interference' 521
1. The Court's general approach in property cases 521
2. Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden 521
3. The meaning of 'property' for the purposes of the guarantee 525
4. Interferences with property rights: the three rules 528
a. The first rule: peaceful enjoyment of property 528
b. The second rule: deprivation of property 529
c. The third rule: control over the use of property 529
5. Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland 530
6. Tre Traktorer Aktiebolag v. Sweden 531
7. Gasus Dosier-und Fodertechnik v. Netherlands 533
B. Assessing whether an interference is justified:
legal certainty and the public interest 539
1. The requirement of lawfulness 540
2. Determining the 'general' or 'public' interest for an
interference with property rights 541
3. James and Others v. United Kingdom 542
4. Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece 546
5. Beyeler v.Italy 549
C. Assessing whether an interference is justified: proportionality 553
1. Lithgow and Others v. United Kingdom 555
2. Jahn and Others v. Germany 560
11. THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION 568
A. Introduction 568
B. The Belgian Linguistic case (No. 2) 570
C. Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark 574
D. Campbell and Cosans v. United Kingdom 581
E. Valsamis v. Greece 588
F. Sahin v. Turkey 592
G. Some consequences of the Convention right to education 597
12 THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY OF PERSON 601
A. Introduction 602
1. Kurt v. Turkey 602
2. Cyprus v. Turkey 605
B. Has there been a deprivation of liberty? 610
1. Guzzardi v. Italy 610
2. Engel and Others v. The Netherlands 614
3. H.M. v. Switzerland 618
C. Detention after conviction 621
1. Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium 622
2. Weeks v. United Kingdom 624
3. Thynne, Wilson and Gunnell v. United Kingdom 628
4. Stafford v. United Kingdom 632
D. Detention of mental patients 639
1. Winterwerp v. The Netherlands 639
2. X v. United Kingdom 643
3. Johnson v. United Kingdom 646
E. Other permitted grounds of detention 651
1. Lawful arrest or detention on reasonable suspicion of
having committed an offence 651
a. Loukanov v. Bulgaria 653
b. Steel and Others v. United Kingdom 655
c. Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. United Kingdom 658
d. Jablonski v. Poland g^j
2. Arrest or detention to secure the fulfilment of
an obligation prescribed by law 664
a. Benham v. United Kingdom 664
3. Arrest or detention for the prevention of the
spreading of infectious diseases 666
a. Enhorn v. Sweden 666
4. Arrest or detention to prevent an unauthorized entry into
the country or with a view to deportation or extradition 670
a. Amuur v. France 670
b. Conka v. Belgium 673
c. Chahal v. United Kingdom 677
F. Right to be brought promptly before a judge or other officer
authorized to exercise judicial power 681
1. Who may exercise judicial power for the purposes of Article 5(3)? 681
a. Huber v. Switzerland 682
2. The meaning of'promptly'in Article 5(3) 685
a. Brogan v. United Kingdom 686
G. The right to a decision by a court as to
the legality of detention 690
1. Sanchez-Reisse v. Switzerland 692
2. Bouamar v. Belgium 695
3. Megyeri v. Germany 698
H. The challenge of terrorism and the right of
states to derogate from the Convention 702
1. Lawless v. Republic of Ireland (No. 3) 703
2. The sequel to Brogan v. United Kingdom 706
3. Brannigan v. United Kingdom 706
4. Aksoy v.Turkey 712
5. Habeas corpus in emergency situations 715
13 THE RIGHT TO A FAIR AND PUBLIC HEARING 718
A. Introduction 718
B. Criminal charges and civil rights 720
1. Oztiirk v.Germany 721
2. Benham v. United Kingdom 725
3. When has a criminal charge been determined? 726
4. Do disciplinary and other punitive procedures involve the
determination of criminal charges? 730
5. Campbell and Fells v. United Kingdom 731
6. Civil rights and public rights 738
7. Feldbrugge v. The Netherlands 745
8. Employment in the public service 755
9. Eskelinen v. Finland 756
10. Further aspects of the scope of Article 6(1) 762
C. An independent and impartial tribunal 766
1. Piersack v. Belgium 766
2. The problem of prior involvement 769
3. Sigurdsson v. Iceland 776
4. Objective impartiality 781
5. Independence 783
6. Administrative agencies and disciplinary bodies 787
D. Equality of arms 792
1. Dombo Beheer B.V. v. The Netherlands 793
2. Aspects of equality 797
3. R. (Roberts) v. Parole Board and Another 799
4. The right to confront witnesses 807
5. The right to counsel 812
a. Granger v. United Kingdom 812
E. The requirements of prompt adjudication 816
PART III THE IMPACT OF THE STRASBOURG SYSTEM
14 THE EFFECT IN NATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 829
A. The diverse legal systems in Europe 829
B. The duty of states to give effect to the Convention
in national law 831
1. Does the Convention require states (a) to give direct effect in
national law to the substantive rights protected by the Convention?
and (b) to provide a procedure in national law for enabling
individuals to remedy breaches of those Convention rights? 831
a. Klass v. Germany 834
b. Silver v. United Kingdom g37
c. Chahal v. United Kingdom 842
2. Is it the duty of a state to comply with remedial measures
required following a breach of the Convention? 845
a. Vermeire v. Belgium 845
C. Incorporation of the Convention—the practice of states 849
D. The effect of the Convention in the law of the United Kingdom 854
1. Malone v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner 855
2. R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind 856
3. Giving effect to the Convention in United Kingdom law 859
a. Rights brought home: the Human Rights Bill 859
4. The Human Rights Act 1998 864
5. The duty to interpret legislation in accordance
with the Convention 866
a. Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza 866
6. Judicial review of legislation that is inconsistent
with the Convention 869
a. ,\ v. Secretary of State for the Home Department 869
E. The relation between the Convention and Community law 873
15 PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS 878
A. What to do about case load and coherence? 878
1. The flood of applications 879
2. A victim of its own success? 881
3. Pilot judgments 883
4. Coping with the case load and coherence 884
B. What to do about coverage and compliance? 885
1. Extending the rights protected 885
2. Adding the European Union 886
3. Implementing judgments 889
4. Addressing systemic violations of the Convention 895
5. Improving coverage and compliance 896
APPENDIX A Convention for the Protection of
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 899
APPENDIX B Proposed Protocol 14 to the Convention 927
APPENDIX C The Human Rights Act 1998 (United Kingdom) 934
Index 951 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Janis, Mark W. 1947- Kay, Richard S. Bradley, Anthony W. 1934- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)123992966 (DE-588)128433442 |
| author_facet | Janis, Mark W. 1947- Kay, Richard S. Bradley, Anthony W. 1934- |
| author_role | aut aut aut |
| author_sort | Janis, Mark W. 1947- |
| author_variant | m w j mw mwj r s k rs rsk a w b aw awb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022552962 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJC5132 |
| callnumber-raw | KJC5132 |
| callnumber-search | KJC5132 |
| callnumber-sort | KJC 45132 |
| classification_rvk | PS 4080 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)173502774 (DE-599)BVBBV022552962 |
| dewey-full | 342.408/5 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.408/5 |
| dewey-search | 342.408/5 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.408 15 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 3. ed. |
| era | Geschichte gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022552962</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20091008</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070810s2008 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780199277469</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-927746-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)173502774</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022552962</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC5132</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.408/5</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 4080</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139832:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Janis, Mark W.</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)123992966</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">European human rights law</subfield><subfield code="b">text and materials</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark W. Janis ; Richard S. Kay ; Anthony W. Bradley</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3. ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press.</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LVI, 957 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europarat</subfield><subfield code="b">Kommission für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)37220-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms</subfield><subfield code="d">(1950)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention</subfield><subfield code="f">1950 November 4</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015727-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europese conventie tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mensenrechten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human rights</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human rights</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europa (geografie)</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015701-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015701-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention</subfield><subfield code="f">1950 November 4</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015727-1</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europarat</subfield><subfield code="b">Kommission für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)37220-1</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kay, Richard S.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bradley, Anthony W.</subfield><subfield code="d">1934-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)128433442</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015759253&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">2\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015759253</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europa (geografie) gtt Europa Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 gnd Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Europa (geografie) Europa Großbritannien |
| id | DE-604.BV022552962 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T18:14:12Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T11:18:37Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780199277469 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015759253 |
| oclc_num | 173502774 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-12 DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-703 DE-521 DE-11 DE-188 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-12 DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-703 DE-521 DE-11 DE-188 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | LVI, 957 S. |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Oxford Univ. Press. |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Janis, Mark W. 1947- Verfasser (DE-588)123992966 aut European human rights law text and materials Mark W. Janis ; Richard S. Kay ; Anthony W. Bradley 3. ed. Oxford [u.a.] Oxford Univ. Press. 2008 LVI, 957 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Europarat Kommission für Menschenrechte (DE-588)37220-1 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens gtt Europese conventie tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden gtt Mensenrechten gtt Menschenrecht Human rights Europe Human rights Europe Cases Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd rswk-swf Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd rswk-swf Europa (geografie) gtt Europa Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 g Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 s DE-604 Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 u Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 b Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 s Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s Geschichte z 1\p DE-604 Europarat Kommission für Menschenrechte (DE-588)37220-1 b 2\p DE-604 Kay, Richard S. Verfasser aut Bradley, Anthony W. 1934- Verfasser (DE-588)128433442 aut HBZ Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015759253&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk 2\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Janis, Mark W. 1947- Kay, Richard S. Bradley, Anthony W. 1934- European human rights law text and materials Europarat Kommission für Menschenrechte (DE-588)37220-1 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens gtt Europese conventie tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden gtt Mensenrechten gtt Menschenrecht Human rights Europe Human rights Europe Cases Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)37220-1 (DE-588)1003803-6 (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4015727-1 (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4139832-4 (DE-588)4074725-6 (DE-588)4015701-5 (DE-588)4022153-2 |
| title | European human rights law text and materials |
| title_auth | European human rights law text and materials |
| title_exact_search | European human rights law text and materials |
| title_exact_search_txtP | European human rights law text and materials |
| title_full | European human rights law text and materials Mark W. Janis ; Richard S. Kay ; Anthony W. Bradley |
| title_fullStr | European human rights law text and materials Mark W. Janis ; Richard S. Kay ; Anthony W. Bradley |
| title_full_unstemmed | European human rights law text and materials Mark W. Janis ; Richard S. Kay ; Anthony W. Bradley |
| title_short | European human rights law |
| title_sort | european human rights law text and materials |
| title_sub | text and materials |
| topic | Europarat Kommission für Menschenrechte (DE-588)37220-1 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 (DE-588)4015727-1 gnd Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens gtt Europese conventie tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden gtt Mensenrechten gtt Menschenrecht Human rights Europe Human rights Europe Cases Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europarat Kommission für Menschenrechte Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte Europäische Union Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950) Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention 1950 November 4 Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens Europese conventie tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden Mensenrechten Menschenrecht Human rights Europe Human rights Europe Cases Rechtsprechung Rechtsstreit Europa (geografie) Europa Großbritannien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015759253&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT janismarkw europeanhumanrightslawtextandmaterials AT kayrichards europeanhumanrightslawtextandmaterials AT bradleyanthonyw europeanhumanrightslawtextandmaterials |