Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st.: Vitalij Vasylenko
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Ukrainian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Dnipropetrovsʹk
Nacionalʹnyj Hirnyčyj Univ.
2006
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache |
| Beschreibung: | 659 S. |
| ISBN: | 9663500557 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022468035 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20120829 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 070618s2006 |||| 00||| ukr d | ||
| 020 | |a 9663500557 |9 966-350-055-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)213496108 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022468035 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a ukr | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vasylenko, Vitalij Oleksandrovyč |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. |b Vitalij Vasylenko |
| 264 | 1 | |a Dnipropetrovsʹk |b Nacionalʹnyj Hirnyčyj Univ. |c 2006 | |
| 300 | |a 659 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1800-1935 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte bis 1569 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Geschichtsschreibung |0 (DE-588)4020531-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Großfürstentum Litauen |0 (DE-588)4499060-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Großfürstentum Litauen |0 (DE-588)4499060-1 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Politik |0 (DE-588)4046514-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte bis 1569 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichtsschreibung |0 (DE-588)4020531-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1800-1935 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015675577 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0903 |g 4793 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0903 |g 438 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804136553982722048 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | 657
ЗМІСТ
ПЕРЕДМОВА
..............................................................................................
З
ВСТУП
......................................................................................................... 5
РОЗДІЛ І. Історіографія утворення Великого князівства Литовсько¬
го та формування його державної території
...................................................... 23
Внутрішні і зовнішні передумови утворення Великого князівства
Литовського
.......................................................................................................... 23
Формування ядра литовсько-руської державної території за
правління Міндаугаса
........................................................................................... 29
Литовсько-Руська держава за найближчих наступників Міндау¬
гаса (до кінця
XIII
ст.)
.......................................................................................... 42
Територіальне зростання Великого князівства Литовського за
Витяніса і Ґедімінаса
............................................................................................ 47
Боротьба Литви за галицько-волинські землі
.................................... 50
Проблема часу і обставин приєднання Київської землі до Литов-
сько-Руської держави
........................................................................................... 79
Перехід Поділля під литовську зверхність
......................................... 89
Входження чернігово-сіверських земель, Переяславщини та вер-
хівських князівств до складу Литовсько-Руської держави
............................. 98
Прилучення Смоленська
....................................................................... 105
РОЗДІЛ
II.
Історіографія еволюції політичного устрою Литовсько-
Руської держави
................................................................................................... 115
Великокнязівська влада та удільна система (до кінця
XIV
ст.).
Проблема литовсько-руського феодалізму
.................................................... 115
Боротьба Витаутаса з обласними князями та її результати
.............. 134
Завершення ліквідації удільної системи у Великому князівстві
Литовському
......................................................................................................... 146
Еволюція відносин між великокнязівською владою, магнатством
!
шляхтою в політичній системі Литовсько-Руської держави; Пани-рада і
сейм
....................................................................................................................... 154
РОЗДІЛ
III
Історіографія становища руського населення Великого
князівства Литовського та внутрішньополітичної боротьби у ньому
............ 169
Роль руського елементу в утворенні Великого князівства Литов¬
ського та на початкових етапах його існування (до кінця
XIII
ст.)
................ 169
Литва і Русь за правління Витяніса і Ґедімінаса
............................... 173
658
Місце руського складника в державі за Альгірдаса і Йогайли (до
1385
ρ
/)
та внутрішньополітична боротьба цієї доби
...................................... 179
Вплив Кревської унії на еволюцію литовсько-руських взаємин та
внутрішньополітичні процеси в державі
........................................................ (99
Руська політика Витаутаса. Наслідки Городельського привілею
1413
ρ
................................................................................................................... 206
Литовська Русь за часів боротьби Швітрігайли і Жиґімантаса І
..... 215
Руська політика Казімераса. Змова князів
1481
ρ
...................... 240
Повстання Михайла Глинського
......................................................... 258
Становище руського елементу за правління Жиґімантаса
II
та Жи-
пмантаса-Аугустаса і його формальне зрівняння в правах привілеями
1560-
х рр
........................................................................................................................ 267
Місце Великого князівства Литовського в історії східнослов ян¬
ських народів
......................................................................................................... 272
РОЗДІЛ
ÍV.
Історіографія зовнішньополітичної історії Литовсько-
Руської держави
................................................................................................... 292
Взаємини Великого князівства Литовського з великоруськими
державними утвореннями
................................................................................... 292
. Москва
.......................................................................................... 292
2.
Твер
............................................................................................... 341
3.
Рязань та Нижній Новгород
........................................................ 353
4.
Новгород Великий
....................................................................... 361
5.
Псков
........................................................................................... 384
З татарським світом
.......................................................................... 391
1.
Золота Орда (до другої третини
XV
ст.)
................................... 391
2.
Держави-спадкоємці Золотої Орди та Османська імперія
...... 407
З Прусським та Лівонським орденами, папською курією, Імпе¬
рією
....................................................................................................................... 425
З Молдовою, Угорщиною, Данією, Швецією
................................... 450
З Польщею та Мазовією (до
1385
р.)
................................................. 454
РОЗДІЛ
V.
Історіографія політичних взаємин Великої о князівства
Литовського з Польщею в
1385-1569
рр
.......................................................... 456
Кревський договір і розвиток литовсько-польських відносин до
1392
ρ
................................................................................................................... 456
Острівська угода та її вплив на еволюцію литовсько-польських
стосунків
*............................................................................................................ 467
Вільнюсько-Радомська унія
............................................................... 474
Городельська унія
............................................................................... 478
Відносини Витаутаса з Польщею в останні роки правління
.......... 482
Литовськсмтольські взаємини 1430-х рр
.......................................... 487
Еволюція міждержавних відносин у
1440-1501
pp.
Мельницька
унія
...................................................................................................................... 4%
659
Унійна справа за часів Жигімантаса
II
і Жигімантаса-Аугустаса
(до початку 1560-х
pp.)
.............................................................................. ........ 507
Литовсько-польська боротьба навколо унійного питання протя¬
гом
1
560-х рр
...................................................................................................... 512
Люблінська унія та її наслідки для Великого князівства Литовсь¬
кого
..................................................................................................................... 519
ПІСЛЯМОВА
.......................................................................................... 532
БІБЛІОГРАФІЯ
.................................................. ...................................... 535
Публікації джерел
............................................................................... 535
Література
............................................................................................ 544
СПИСОК СКОРОЧЕНЬ
.......................................................................... 620
ІМЕННИЙ і ГЕОГРАФІЧНИЙ ПОКАЖЧИК
...................................... 623
SUMMARY
.............................................................................................. 653
ЗМІСТ
........................................................................................................ 657
653
SUMMARY
V.O.
VasyJenko.
Politica!
history of the Great Lithuanian Princedom (before
1569)
in East Slavonic Historiographies of the 19th
-
first third of the
20*
centuries .
In the monograph
tire
author researches process of study of political history of
the Great Lithuanian Princedom (hereinafter referred to as the GLP ), the time of its
independent existence in Belamssian, Russian and Ukrainian Historiographies of the
19 -
first third of the
20
centuries. These researches resulted in the following con¬
clusions.
The large part played by Lithuanian-Rus State in the past of Belarus , Ukraine
and Russia stimulated for significant attention to its history by East Slavonic re¬
searchers As far back as over the period of the 18th
-
early
19
centuries works of
V.Tatischev, M.Scherbatov, N.Karamzin founded study of this set of issues, though
that time history of the GLP has not became a subject of special studies yet. Suffi¬
cient rise of interest to the GLP phenomenon is observed after Polish rebel of
1830-
1831.
At that time Russian government and the society felt the need for incorpora¬
tion of the past of the Western Russia . J.Senkovskij and N.Usrrialov proposed a
theory under which the GLP was represented as
a Rus
state, so its history is a part
of
Rus (i. e.
East Slavonic) history. (It is paradoxical, but many theses which
grounded
Rus
character of the GLP were naturalized from Polish
historiographie
tradition. Besides, we have expressed arguments of the fact that some authors (Ustria-
lov, for example) were not quite sure in
Rus
nature of the GLP, protected by them.
However, this position met with opposition by other researchers headed by S.Solo-
viev.
Yet in
1840 - 1
850th interest in Iithuanistic studies in Russian Empire consi¬
derably fell. It should be mentioned that majority of researchers of this range of is¬
sues originated from the territory of the former GLP i. e. Ukrainian or Belarussian
lands. A number of Halych-Rus historians (D.Zubryts kyj, I.Sharanevych) paid si¬
gnificant attention to it.
Polish rebel of
1863
having caused severer aggravation of political relations
than the previous one, also favored stronger and longer splash of attention to the his¬
tory of the GLP. Thus Polish calls were one of the key reason of approach of East
Slavonic historians to this subject for a long time. These calls were rather in poli¬
tics and ideology than in academic space. So, it is not strange that non-scientific fac¬
tors had a significant influence on the researches
ofthat
time that resulted in mainly
publicistic
nature of the works by M.Kojalovich, I.Beliajev and others (to a lesser ex¬
tant it is related to K.Bestuzhev-Riumin). The tendencies firstly started by Ustrialov
in
1
830th yet became stronger in 1860th: artificial ideolizmg of Lithuanian vs
Rus
re¬
lations, hyperbolizing of
Rus
and Orthodox influence in the
GL/
(up to non-division
of Lithuania and
Rus )
before
1385
and later ethnic and confession antagonism, stra¬
ggle of national and religious parties , as well as exaggeration of pro-Moscow sym¬
pathies of Lithuanian
Rus
inhabitation. Lithuanian-Rus (as well as Moscow) gove-
654
rnment was characterized by
síep
by step intention to unite
Rus
lands. The lessening
of the role of ethnic Lithuanians in Western
Rus
State was the opposite side of this
action. Prior
ISóO**1
it was often the case of borrowing of views of Polish historians in
East Slavonic lithuanistic science, but now stable declension from them occurs.
At the same time we notice transference of
Kyïv
University into the center of
lithuanistic studies in Russian Empire. Picture of history of the Great Lithuanian Pri¬
ncedom before the middle of the 15th century by
V. Antonových
without exaggera¬
tion became an epochal event. Critical remarks to this work made by M.Dashkcvych
and the related monographs of other
Antonových
s
students were significantly impor¬
tant.
The specified works laved a foundation for the highest rise over all the history
of lithuanistic science
(1880 -
1900th). At that time two more centers appeared in
Moscow (M.Liubavskij, V.PicSieta) and a bit later in L viv (M.Hrushevs kyj, B.Bar-
vins kyj). It the studies
ofthat
time we notice significant influence of positive direc¬
tion. Over
1880й
- 1890*
a great attention was paid, for example, to the research of
history of struggle of the GLP for Halychyna and Volyn (works of I.Filevich and
others). From
1890й1
the progress in studies of Lithuanian vs Polish Unions in Polish
Historiography greatly effected East Slavonic lithuanistic science. In general at this
time we can notice a definite closing in the views of East Slavonic and Polish histori¬
ans. It caused by both achievements in definite historical researches and their step by
step deideolizing, refusal from many stereotypes (mainly, mention above). However,
it is related only to a part of special works and almost left untouched popular works.
Long opposition in the historiography of two traditions concerning voluntary entra¬
nce of
Rus íands
to the GLP and their conquest finished at last by the victory of the
first (in the Soviet times situation changed for the opposite).
At the same time attention rises to the social and economic history and history
of the law of the GLP (that is hardly observed in Polish researchers) So, starting
from the beginning of 1900th we notice distinct fall of interest to political history,
therewith widely researched are government and institutions of the GLP, role and po¬
sitions of various social groups in political actions It is precisely these spheres where
leading positions of the following East Slavonic researchers F.Leontovych, M.Viadi-
inirskij-Budanov, S.Bershads kyj, MJasym kyj, M.Liubavskij, M.Hrushevskyj,
M.Dovnar-Zapoľskij,
l.
Lappo,
M.Maksymejko, J.Malynovs kyj, A.Presniakov, V.
Pi¬
cheta
were mostly obvious (However, it comes that
historiographie
significance of
Liubavskii s works related
ю
development of lithuanistic science in Russian Empire
is hyperbolized in a way).
At the boundary of the 19th
-
20th centuries an issue of the place of the GLP in
Rus histoťy
is arisen again. Accumulation of knowledge and transfer to more ade¬
quate imagination of this state made obvious the fact that differences between South-
West and
North-f-as! Rus
can not be explained by Polish influence only. As a conse¬
quence, a part of Russian historians was ready to reject the concept of Senkovskij
Ustrialov and historical heritance of the GLP; Hrushevs kyj, from his part, aiso stated
the necessity of it
Starting from 1910th, we notice step by step but steady reduction of intensity
оГ
lithuanistic studies caused by death of one authors and deviation from this subject the
655
of oilier ones We notice beginning of crisis of East Slavonic lithuanistic sciences, re¬
sulted in transfer of the leading place in this field to Polish Historiography. The pe¬
riod of 2c and beginning of
ЗО1 1
of the 20lh century turned out to bring few
fruits
too.
Neglect of political history in the Soviet Historical Science of that time told upon;
and in Belarussran Historiography, where the greatest attention was given to history
of the GLP, the problem was weakness of staff
potenţial
Belarassian researchers
were mostly restricted by defense of their concept of the GLP (as Litbuanian-Bela-
russian State ) similar to the way passed by their Russian predecessors in 1830th and
1860
It is indicative that Belarussian Historiography adapted many thesis from
the arsenal of Russian historians of the
19
century to its own needs.
Starting from the beginning of 1930th noticeable deviation of historical science
of the USSR from
Marx
methodology, marked in the pattern of vulgar
sociologism ;
is significantly gave the way to the concepts inherited (and modified to some extent)
from traditional Russian Historiography. As the same time we can notice actual inter¬
rupt of lithuanistic studies.
Thus, establishment and achievement of the best successes (so far) of East Sla¬
vonic humanistic science were noticed in the researched
historiographie
time (the 19th
-
the first third of the
20*
centuries). Within this key stage representative source base
of researches was formed, that made possible reconstruction of the main layer of his-
loncal facts. The most studied in East Slavonic Historiographies are ethnic and con-
lession relations inside the GLP and also history of relations of this state with Mos¬
cow and evolution of Lithuanian vs Polish union relations. Specific feature of the so¬
urces caused inclination of many researchers to a priori generalization; so far a num¬
ber of problems are solved hypothetically or hardly may be solved (for example, in
relation of existence of Lithuanian-Rus Feudalism or historical and judicial quali¬
fication of Lithuanian vs Polish agreements of
1385-1569).
However, in this case the
кеу
variants of solution of the disputable issues have already been suggested during
the period under view.
Opening of the history of the GLP by Russian historians has unexpected con¬
sequences. Its researches gave an initial impulse (from the middle of the 19lh century)
for emancipation of Belarussian Historiography from Russian one and (in a lesser ex¬
tent) assisted completion of division of the latter with Ukrainian one It is natural that
establishment of these two national historiographies resulted in their claims to the hi¬
storical inheritance of the GLP. Step by step in each East Slavonic
historiographie
traditions a consolidated vision of the place of the GLP in its history was formed.
For Belarussian historians it was their state, an integral part of
lhe
past of their na¬
tion.
Tlie
most representatives of Ukrainian Historiography, vise versa, interpreted
Lithuanian Time as a period that was without their statehood. Difference of opinion
was mostly seen in the midst of Russian historians. Depending on the extent of influ¬
ence of traditional Moscwocentrism, a part of them considered Moscow State as the
only possible center of unification of former lands of KyiV
Rus ;
other ones consi¬
dered it an alternative cell of the GLP.
A side result of
historiographie
researches made by the author became a range
of conclusions related to political history of the GLP of the second half of the
14*
century. Lack of reason of the statement related to the struggle for the power between
656
Algirdas
and Kęstutis,
around
1350,
and pro-Moscow lines of
Kęstutis
in foreign
policy are proved. Attribution of plans of direct subordination of the princedoms of
Central and East Great Russia to the Lithuanian-Rus government is unfounded. Gol¬
den Horde khans tags issued to the Lithuanian great princes authorized them only for
South
Rus
(mostly Ukrainian) lands, rather than supreme power in the GLP. Towns
Khorvach and
Rodnia
proved to belong to Smolensk in
1368
rather than Tver. The
author suggests clarifications related to biography of Andrij Olgerdovich (he had no
contacts with Moscow when his father was alive; in
1380
he was not a prince in
Pskov; in
1386
he came back to Polotsk with the assistance of
Livonian
knights). The
similar is related to the set of problems related to Kulikovo Fight of
1380
(unreason¬
able consents of subordination of Kyfv and Siverian lands to Moscow just before the
Fight; legendary are notices about participation of significant community from
Rus
lands of the GLP and from Pskov; the reason of Jogaila s failure to Fight was not his
coming late but the fact that Mamaj with his troops did not arrive as agreed to the
prior specified place of unification). There is no reason to hyperbolized negative con¬
sequences of the Fight for position of the GLP; so, notification of territorial claims by
Dmitrij Ivanovich moscovian to
Jogaila
is an idea of M.Stryjkovski. Existing presen¬
tations related to the Lithuanian vs Moscow agreements, mentioned in description ot
archives of the Embassy
Prikaz
of
1626,
needs correction (credential of
Jogaila,
Skir-
gaila and Kaributas as well as Andrij Olgerdovich, are only unapproved draft agree¬
ments with Moscow; preliminary agreement of
Uliana Alexandrovna
with Dmitry
Ivanovich could not appear in
1384,
but only between November
1381
and June
1382
when supreme power in the GLP was seized by
Kęstutis).
Evident exaggeration is a
statement about catastrophisity of the status of the Lithuanian-Rus State and per¬
sonally
Jogaila
before Kxevo Union of
1385.
|
| adam_txt |
657
ЗМІСТ
ПЕРЕДМОВА
.
З
ВСТУП
. 5
РОЗДІЛ І. Історіографія утворення Великого князівства Литовсько¬
го та формування його державної території
. 23
Внутрішні і зовнішні передумови утворення Великого князівства
Литовського
. 23
Формування "ядра" литовсько-руської державної території за
правління Міндаугаса
. 29
Литовсько-Руська держава за найближчих наступників Міндау¬
гаса (до кінця
XIII
ст.)
. 42
Територіальне зростання Великого князівства Литовського за
Витяніса і Ґедімінаса
. 47
Боротьба Литви за галицько-волинські землі
. 50
Проблема часу і обставин приєднання Київської землі до Литов-
сько-Руської держави
. 79
Перехід Поділля під литовську зверхність
. 89
Входження чернігово-сіверських земель, Переяславщини та "вер-
хівських" князівств до складу Литовсько-Руської держави
. 98
Прилучення Смоленська
. 105
РОЗДІЛ
II.
Історіографія еволюції політичного устрою Литовсько-
Руської держави
. 115
Великокнязівська влада та "удільна" система (до кінця
XIV
ст.).
Проблема литовсько-руського "феодалізму"
. 115
Боротьба Витаутаса з обласними князями та її результати
. 134
Завершення ліквідації "удільної" системи у Великому князівстві
Литовському
. 146
Еволюція відносин між великокнязівською владою, магнатством
!
шляхтою в політичній системі Литовсько-Руської держави; Пани-рада і
сейм
. 154
РОЗДІЛ
III
Історіографія становища руського населення Великого
князівства Литовського та внутрішньополітичної боротьби у ньому
. 169
Роль руського елементу в утворенні Великого князівства Литов¬
ського та на початкових етапах його існування (до кінця
XIII
ст.)
. 169
Литва і Русь за правління Витяніса і Ґедімінаса
. 173
658
Місце руського складника в державі за Альгірдаса і Йогайли (до
1385
ρ
/)
та внутрішньополітична боротьба цієї доби
. 179
Вплив Кревської унії на еволюцію литовсько-руських взаємин та
внутрішньополітичні процеси в державі
. (99
"Руська" політика Витаутаса. Наслідки Городельського привілею
1413
ρ
. 206
Литовська Русь за часів боротьби Швітрігайли і Жиґімантаса І
. 215
"Руська" політика Казімераса. "Змова князів"
1481
ρ
. 240
Повстання Михайла Глинського
. 258
Становище руського елементу за правління Жиґімантаса
II
та Жи-
пмантаса-Аугустаса і його формальне зрівняння в правах привілеями
1560-
х рр
. 267
Місце Великого князівства Литовського в історії східнослов'ян¬
ських народів
. 272
РОЗДІЛ
ÍV.
Історіографія зовнішньополітичної історії Литовсько-
Руської держави
. 292
Взаємини Великого князівства Литовського з великоруськими
державними утвореннями
. 292
\. Москва
. 292
2.
Твер
. 341
3.
Рязань та Нижній Новгород
. 353
4.
Новгород Великий
. 361
5.
Псков
. 384
З "татарським світом"
. 391
1.
Золота Орда (до другої третини
XV
ст.)
. 391
2.
Держави-спадкоємці Золотої Орди та Османська імперія
. 407
З Прусським та Лівонським орденами, папською курією, Імпе¬
рією
. 425
З Молдовою, Угорщиною, Данією, Швецією
. 450
З Польщею та Мазовією (до
1385
р.)
. 454
РОЗДІЛ
V.
Історіографія політичних взаємин Великої о князівства
Литовського з Польщею в
1385-1569
рр
. 456
Кревський договір і розвиток литовсько-польських відносин до
1392
ρ
. 456
Острівська угода та її вплив на еволюцію литовсько-польських
стосунків
*. 467
Вільнюсько-Радомська унія
. 474
Городельська унія
. 478
Відносини Витаутаса з Польщею в останні роки правління
. 482
Литовськсмтольські взаємини 1430-х рр
. 487
Еволюція міждержавних відносин у
1440-1501
pp.
Мельницька
унія
. 4%
659
"Унійна справа"' за часів Жигімантаса
II
і Жигімантаса-Аугустаса
(до початку 1560-х
pp.)
.'. 507
Литовсько-польська боротьба навколо унійного питання протя¬
гом
1
560-х рр
. 512
Люблінська унія та її наслідки для Великого князівства Литовсь¬
кого
. 519
ПІСЛЯМОВА
. 532
БІБЛІОГРАФІЯ
.'. 535
Публікації джерел
. 535
Література
. 544
СПИСОК СКОРОЧЕНЬ
. 620
ІМЕННИЙ і ГЕОГРАФІЧНИЙ ПОКАЖЧИК
. 623
SUMMARY
. 653
ЗМІСТ
. 657
653
SUMMARY
V.O.
VasyJenko.
"Politica!
history of the Great Lithuanian Princedom (before
1569)
in East Slavonic Historiographies of the 19th
-
first third of the
20*
centuries".
In the monograph
tire
author researches process of study of political history of
the Great Lithuanian Princedom (hereinafter referred to as "the GLP"), the time of its
independent existence in Belamssian, Russian and Ukrainian Historiographies of the
19 -
first third of the
20
centuries. These researches resulted in the following con¬
clusions.
The large part played by Lithuanian-Rus' State in the past of Belarus', Ukraine
and Russia stimulated for significant attention to its history by East Slavonic re¬
searchers As far back as over the period of the 18th
-
early
19
centuries works of
V.Tatischev, M.Scherbatov, N.Karamzin founded study of this set of issues, though
that time history of the GLP has not became a subject of special studies yet. Suffi¬
cient rise of interest to the GLP phenomenon is observed after Polish rebel of
1830-
1831.
At that time Russian government and the society felt the need for "incorpora¬
tion" of the past of the "Western Russia". J.Senkovskij and N.Usrrialov proposed a
theory under which the GLP was represented as
a "Rus"'
state, so its history is a part
of
'
Rus'" (i. e.
East Slavonic) history. (It is paradoxical, but many theses which
grounded
"Rus"'
character of the GLP were naturalized from Polish
historiographie
tradition. Besides, we have expressed arguments of the fact that some authors (Ustria-
lov, for example) were not quite sure in
"Rus"'
nature of the GLP, protected by them.
However, this position met with opposition by other researchers headed by S.Solo-
viev.
Yet in
1840 - 1
850th interest in Iithuanistic studies in Russian Empire consi¬
derably fell. It should be mentioned that majority of researchers of this range of is¬
sues originated from the territory of the former GLP i. e. Ukrainian or Belarussian
lands. A number of "Halych-Rus"' historians (D.Zubryts'kyj, I.Sharanevych) paid si¬
gnificant attention to it.
Polish rebel of
1863
having caused severer aggravation of political relations
than the previous one, also favored stronger and longer splash of attention to the his¬
tory of the GLP. Thus Polish "calls" were one of the key reason of approach of East
Slavonic historians to this subject for a long time. These "calls" were rather in poli¬
tics and ideology than in academic space. So, it is not strange that non-scientific fac¬
tors had a significant influence on the researches
ofthat
time that resulted in mainly
publicistic
nature of the works by M.Kojalovich, I.Beliajev and others (to a lesser ex¬
tant it is related to K.Bestuzhev-Riumin). The tendencies firstly started by Ustrialov
in
1
830th yet became stronger in 1860th: artificial ideolizmg of Lithuanian vs
Rus'
re¬
lations, hyperbolizing of
Rus'
and Orthodox influence in the
GL/
(up to non-division
of Lithuania and
Rus')
before
1385
and later ethnic and confession antagonism, stra¬
ggle of "national and religious parties", as well as exaggeration of pro-Moscow sym¬
pathies of Lithuanian
Rus'
inhabitation. Lithuanian-Rus' (as well as Moscow) gove-
654
rnment was characterized by
síep
by step intention to unite
Rus'
lands. The lessening
of the role of ethnic Lithuanians in "Western
Rus'
State" was the opposite side of this
action. Prior
ISóO**1
it was often the case of borrowing of views of Polish historians in
East Slavonic lithuanistic science, but now stable declension from them occurs.
At the same time we notice transference of
Kyïv
University into the center of
lithuanistic studies in Russian Empire. "Picture of history of the Great Lithuanian Pri¬
ncedom before the middle of the 15th century" by
V. Antonových
without exaggera¬
tion became an epochal event. Critical remarks to this work made by M.Dashkcvych
and the related monographs of other
Antonových'
s
students were significantly impor¬
tant.
The specified works laved a foundation for the highest rise over all the history
of lithuanistic science
(1880 -
1900th). At that time two more centers appeared in
Moscow (M.Liubavskij, V.PicSieta) and a bit later in L'viv (M.Hrushevs'kyj, B.Bar-
vins'kyj). It the studies
ofthat
time we notice significant influence of positive direc¬
tion. Over
1880й'
- 1890*
a great attention was paid, for example, to the research of
history of struggle of the GLP for Halychyna and Volyn' (works of I.Filevich and
others). From
1890й1
the progress in studies of Lithuanian vs Polish Unions in Polish
Historiography greatly effected East Slavonic lithuanistic science. In general at this
time we can notice a definite closing in the views of East Slavonic and Polish histori¬
ans. It caused by both achievements in definite historical researches and their step by
step deideolizing, refusal from many stereotypes (mainly, mention above). However,
it is related only to a part of special works and almost left untouched popular works.
Long opposition in the historiography of two traditions concerning voluntary entra¬
nce of
Rus' 'íands
to the GLP and their conquest finished at last by the victory of the
first (in the Soviet times situation changed for the opposite).
At the same time attention rises to the social and economic history and history
of the law of the GLP (that is hardly observed in Polish researchers) So, starting
from the beginning of 1900th we notice distinct fall of interest to political history,
therewith widely researched are government and institutions of the GLP, role and po¬
sitions of various social groups in political actions It is precisely these spheres where
leading positions of the following East Slavonic researchers F.Leontovych, M.Viadi-
inirskij-Budanov, S.Bershads'kyj, MJasym'kyj, M.Liubavskij, M.Hrushevskyj,
M.Dovnar-Zapoľskij,
l.
Lappo,
M.Maksymejko, J.Malynovs'kyj, A.Presniakov, V.
Pi¬
cheta
were mostly obvious (However, it comes that
historiographie
significance of
Liubavskii's works related
ю
development of lithuanistic science in Russian Empire
is hyperbolized in a way).
At the boundary of the 19th
-
20th centuries an issue of the place of the GLP in
'Rus'" histoťy
is arisen again. Accumulation of knowledge and transfer to more ade¬
quate imagination of this state made obvious the fact that differences between South-
West and
North-f-as! Rus'
can not be explained by Polish influence only. As a conse¬
quence, a part of Russian historians was ready to reject the concept of Senkovskij
Ustrialov and historical heritance of the GLP; Hrushevs'kyj, from his part, aiso stated
the necessity of it
Starting from 1910th, we notice step by step but steady reduction of intensity
оГ
lithuanistic studies caused by death of one authors and deviation from this subject the
655
of oilier ones We notice beginning of crisis of East Slavonic lithuanistic sciences, re¬
sulted in transfer of' the leading place in this field to Polish Historiography. The pe¬
riod of 2c" and beginning of
ЗО1'1
of the 20lh century' turned out to bring few
fruits
too.
Neglect of political history in the Soviet Historical Science of that time told upon;
and in Belarussran Historiography, where the greatest attention was given to history
of the GLP, the problem was weakness of staff
potenţial
Belarassian researchers
were mostly restricted by defense of their concept of the GLP (as "Litbuanian-Bela-
russian State") similar to the way passed by their Russian predecessors in 1830th and
1860
\ It is indicative that Belarussian Historiography "adapted" many thesis from
the arsenal of Russian historians of the
19''
century to its own needs.
Starting from the beginning of 1930th noticeable deviation of historical science
of the USSR from
Marx
methodology, marked in the pattern of "vulgar
sociologism";
is significantly gave the way to the concepts inherited (and modified to some extent)
from traditional Russian Historiography. As the same time we can notice actual inter¬
rupt of lithuanistic studies.
Thus, establishment and achievement of the best successes (so far) of East Sla¬
vonic humanistic science were noticed in the researched
historiographie
time (the 19th
-
the first third of the
20*
centuries). Within this key stage representative source base
of researches was formed, that made possible reconstruction of the main layer of his-
loncal facts. The most studied in East Slavonic Historiographies are ethnic and con-
lession relations inside the GLP and also history of relations of this state with Mos¬
cow and evolution of Lithuanian vs Polish union relations. Specific feature of the so¬
urces caused inclination of many researchers to a priori generalization; so far a num¬
ber of problems are solved hypothetically or hardly may be solved (for example, in
relation of existence of "Lithuanian-Rus' Feudalism" or historical and judicial quali¬
fication of Lithuanian vs Polish agreements of
1385-1569).
However, in this case the
кеу
variants of solution of the disputable issues have already been suggested during
the period under view.
"Opening" of the history of the GLP by Russian historians has unexpected con¬
sequences. Its researches gave an initial impulse (from the middle of the 19lh century)
for emancipation of Belarussian Historiography from Russian one and (in a lesser ex¬
tent) assisted completion of division of the latter with Ukrainian one It is natural that
establishment of these two national historiographies resulted in their claims to the hi¬
storical inheritance of the GLP. Step by step in each East Slavonic
historiographie
traditions "a consolidated" vision of the place of the GLP in its history was formed.
For Belarussian historians it was "their" state, an integral part of
lhe
past of their na¬
tion.
Tlie
most representatives of Ukrainian Historiography, vise versa, interpreted
Lithuanian Time as a period that was without their statehood. Difference of opinion
was mostly seen in the midst of Russian historians. Depending on the extent of influ¬
ence of traditional Moscwocentrism, a part of them considered Moscow State as the
only possible center of unification of former lands of KyiV
Rus';
other ones consi¬
dered it an alternative cell of the GLP.
A side result of
historiographie
researches made by the author became a range
of conclusions related to political history of the GLP of the second half of the
14*
century. Lack of reason of the statement related to the struggle for the power between
656
Algirdas
and Kęstutis,
around
1350,
and "pro-Moscow" lines of
Kęstutis
in foreign
policy are proved. Attribution of plans of direct subordination of the princedoms of
Central and East Great Russia to the Lithuanian-Rus' government is unfounded. Gol¬
den Horde khans' tags issued to the Lithuanian great princes authorized them only for
South
Rus'
(mostly Ukrainian) lands, rather than supreme power in the GLP. Towns
Khorvach and
Rodnia
proved to belong to Smolensk in
1368
rather than Tver. The
author suggests clarifications related to biography of Andrij Olgerdovich (he had no
contacts with Moscow when his father was alive; in
1380
he was not a prince in
Pskov; in
1386
he came back to Polotsk with the assistance of
Livonian
knights). The
similar is related to the set of problems related to Kulikovo Fight of
1380
(unreason¬
able consents of subordination of Kyfv and Siverian lands to Moscow just before the
Fight; legendary are notices about participation of significant community from
Rus
lands of the GLP and from Pskov; the reason of Jogaila's failure to Fight was not his
coming late but the fact that Mamaj with his troops did not arrive as agreed to the
prior specified place of unification). There is no reason to hyperbolized negative con¬
sequences of the Fight for position of the GLP; so, notification of territorial claims by
Dmitrij Ivanovich moscovian to
Jogaila
is an idea of M.Stryjkovski. Existing presen¬
tations related to the Lithuanian vs Moscow agreements, mentioned in description ot
archives of the Embassy
Prikaz
of
1626,
needs correction (credential of
Jogaila,
Skir-
gaila and Kaributas as well as Andrij Olgerdovich, are only unapproved draft agree¬
ments with Moscow; preliminary agreement of
Uliana Alexandrovna
with Dmitry
Ivanovich could not appear in
1384,
but only between November
1381
and June
1382
when supreme power in the GLP was seized by
Kęstutis).
Evident exaggeration is a
statement about "catastrophisity" of the status of the Lithuanian-Rus' State and per¬
sonally
Jogaila
before Kxevo Union of
1385. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Vasylenko, Vitalij Oleksandrovyč |
| author_facet | Vasylenko, Vitalij Oleksandrovyč |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Vasylenko, Vitalij Oleksandrovyč |
| author_variant | v o v vo vov |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022468035 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)213496108 (DE-599)BVBBV022468035 |
| era | Geschichte 1800-1935 gnd Geschichte bis 1569 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1800-1935 Geschichte bis 1569 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02111nam a2200469 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022468035</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20120829 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070618s2006 |||| 00||| ukr d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9663500557</subfield><subfield code="9">966-350-055-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)213496108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022468035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vasylenko, Vitalij Oleksandrovyč</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st.</subfield><subfield code="b">Vitalij Vasylenko</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Dnipropetrovsʹk</subfield><subfield code="b">Nacionalʹnyj Hirnyčyj Univ.</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">659 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1800-1935</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte bis 1569</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichtsschreibung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020531-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großfürstentum Litauen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4499060-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Großfürstentum Litauen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4499060-1</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046514-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte bis 1569</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichtsschreibung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020531-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1800-1935</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015675577</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0903</subfield><subfield code="g">4793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0903</subfield><subfield code="g">438</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Großfürstentum Litauen (DE-588)4499060-1 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Großfürstentum Litauen |
| id | DE-604.BV022468035 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T17:43:20Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:58:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9663500557 |
| language | Ukrainian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015675577 |
| oclc_num | 213496108 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 659 S. |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Nacionalʹnyj Hirnyčyj Univ. |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Vasylenko, Vitalij Oleksandrovyč Verfasser aut Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko Dnipropetrovsʹk Nacionalʹnyj Hirnyčyj Univ. 2006 659 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache Geschichte 1800-1935 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte bis 1569 gnd rswk-swf Geschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4020531-9 gnd rswk-swf Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd rswk-swf Großfürstentum Litauen (DE-588)4499060-1 gnd rswk-swf Großfürstentum Litauen (DE-588)4499060-1 g Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 s Geschichte bis 1569 z Geschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4020531-9 s Geschichte 1800-1935 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Vasylenko, Vitalij Oleksandrovyč Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko Geschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4020531-9 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4020531-9 (DE-588)4046514-7 (DE-588)4499060-1 |
| title | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko |
| title_auth | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko |
| title_exact_search | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko |
| title_full | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko |
| title_fullStr | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko |
| title_full_unstemmed | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. Vitalij Vasylenko |
| title_short | Polityčna istorija Velykoho Knjazivstva Lytovsʹkoho (do 1569 r.) v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach XIV - peršoï tretyny XX st. |
| title_sort | politycna istorija velykoho knjazivstva lytovsʹkoho do 1569 r v schidnoslovʺjansʹkych istoriohrafijach xiv persoi tretyny xx st vitalij vasylenko |
| title_sub | Vitalij Vasylenko |
| topic | Geschichtsschreibung (DE-588)4020531-9 gnd Politik (DE-588)4046514-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Geschichtsschreibung Politik Großfürstentum Litauen |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015675577&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vasylenkovitalijoleksandrovyc politycnaistorijavelykohoknjazivstvalytovsʹkohodo1569rvschidnoslovʺjansʹkychistoriohrafijachxivpersoitretynyxxstvitalijvasylenko |