Tragedy and the philosophical life: a response to Martha Nussbaum 2 The Republic
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Lewiston [u.a.]
Mellen
2006
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | IX, 255 S. |
| ISBN: | 0773459235 9780773459236 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cc4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV022270685 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20070523 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 070214s2006 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0773459235 |9 0-7734-5923-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780773459236 |9 978-0-7734-5923-6 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)635160896 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022270685 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-29 | ||
| 084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Beck, Martha C. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tragedy and the philosophical life |b a response to Martha Nussbaum |n 2 |p The Republic |c Martha C. Beck |
| 264 | 1 | |a Lewiston [u.a.] |b Mellen |c 2006 | |
| 300 | |a IX, 255 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 600 | 0 | 7 | |a Plato |d v427-v347 |t Res publica |0 (DE-588)4076164-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Plato |d v427-v347 |t Res publica |0 (DE-588)4076164-2 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |w (DE-604)BV022270671 |g 2 |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m V:DE-604 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015481174&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015481174 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804136274649415680 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFAEE: DR. MARK MOES . FOREWORD: DR. PATRICK HENRY.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V
AEKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII I. INTRODUCTION , . II. NUSSBAUM S
POSITION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 5 A. NUSSBAUM: PLATO IS ANTI- TRAGIE . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. NUSSBAUM: PLATO S WRITING
STYLE IS LINKED TO A VIEW OFHUMAN RATIONALITY, ARTICULATED MOST CLEARLY
IN THE REPUBLIC, THAT IS DETAEHED FROM EMOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 C. NUSSBAUM: PLATO
COMPLETELY CHANGES HIS MIND IN THE PHAEDRUS . . 7 III. RESPONSE TO
NUSSBAUM #1: PLATO S VIEW DID NOT CHANGE, OR CHANGE AS RADIEALLY, AS
NUSSBAUM CLAIMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 A.
CREATING A DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE DIALOGUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 9 B. THE EDUEATION IN THE REPUBLIC TRAINS THE MIND TO SEE
CONNECTIONS; A DIALECTICALLY TRAINCD MIND CAN ACHIEVE A UNIFIED VISION.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .. 10 C. CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE PROTAGORAS,
REPUBLIC, PHAEDRUS AND SYMPOSIUM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 IV. RESPONSE TO
NUSSBAUM #2: PLATO IS NOT ANTI-TRAGIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
A. PLATO AND TRAGEDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17 B. ARISTOTIC S CRITERIA FOR TRAGEDY . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 1. PLOT IS THE
MOST IMPORTANT ASPCCT OFTRAGEDY, THE SOUL OFA TRAGEDY; THE TRAGIC
CONTEXT, OR PLOT, OF THE REPUBLIC . . . . . . . . . 18 2. ARISTOTIE S
OTHER CRITERIA FOR TRAGEDY AND PLATO S DIALOGUES . . .. 23 43 45 42 48
48 48 52 54 57 57 57 26 31 31 33 36 3. THRASYMACHUS: NOT BLIND, BUT
IGNORANT AND UNTEACHABLE . A. JUSTICE AS THE ADVANTAGE OFTHE STRONGER;
. B. TRAGEDY AND THRASYMACHUS LIFE . C. SOCRATES PHILOSOPHIEAL
REINTERPRETATION OFTHRASYMACHUS DEFINITION , 70 2. POLYMARCHUS: BLIND
BUT TEACHABLE . A. HELPING FRIENDS AND HARMING ENEMIES; . B. THE
TRAGEDY OF POLYMARCHUS LIFE . C. SOCRATES PHILOSOPHIEAL
REINTERPRETATION OFPOLYMARCHUS DEFINITION , 61 63 63 68 C. CONNECTIONS
BETWEEN TRAGEDY AND PLALO S DIALOGUES IN RECENT SCHOLARSHIP . V. TRAGEDY
IN THE REPUBLIC. BOOK 1 . A. THE SETTING AND CONTEXT FORESHADOW THE
TRAGEDY TO COME . I. THE REPUBLIC AND THE DEMOCRATIC PERSONALITY . 2.
THE DECIINE OF REGIMES . 3. THE CITY (SOUL) WITHIN THE CITY (REPUBLIC)
WITHIN THE CITY (CEPHALUS HOUSE) WITHIN THE CITY (ATHENS) WITHIN THE
CITY ... 4. THE SPIRIT OF THE LAW VERSUS THE LETTER OFTHE LAW IN ATHENS:
A LEGAL DEMOCRACY AND A SPIRITUAL TYRANNY . B. SOCRATES DESCENT TO THE
PIRAEUS: THE JUSTICE OFTHE PHILOSOPHER . C. DEFINITIONS OF JUSTIEE IN
BOOK 1: THE LOW ROAD AND THE HIGH ROAD . I. CEPHALUS: BLIND AND
UNTEACHABLE . A. TELLING THE TRUTH AND GIVING BACK WHAL IS OWED . B.
TRAGEDY AND CEPHAIUS LIFE . C. SOCRATES PHILOSOPHIEAL REINTERPRETATION
OFCEPHALUS DEFINITIONS OFTHE TRUTH ABOUT LIFE AND JUSTICE . D. THE
REPUBLIC BOOK 1 AND TRAGEDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .. 74 I. ARISTOTLE S CRITERIA FOR TRAGEDYAS LITERATURE . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .. 74 2. A TRAGIC WORLDVIEW. . . .. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . .. 76 3. REEENT SEHOLARSHIP ON PLATO
AND TRAGEDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4. THE TITLE,
REPUBLIC , IS IRONIE AND TRAGIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
VI. THE LOW ROAD: BOOKS LI-V AND VIII-IX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. 83 A. BOOKS LI-IV: THE FOUNDING OF A CITY. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 I. THE LOW ROAD: THE LUXURIOUS
CITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 2. THE LOW ROAD: THE
EDUCATION OFHABITS ONLY... . ... . . . .. . 86 3. THE LOW ROAD: COURAGE,
MODERATION, JUSTIEE, AND WISDOM . . . 88 4. THE LOW ROAD: THE
THREE-PART, HARMONIZED SOUL. . . . . . . . . .. 92 B. BOOK V: TAKING THE
IRRATIONAL MODEL OF THE SOUL TO ITS LOGICAI CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
93 1. THE LOW ROAD: THE EQUALITY OFWOMEN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 93 2. THE LOW ROAD: THE COMMUNITY OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN . . . .. 94
3. SOERATES INTRODUETION OFTHE PHILOSOPHICAL RULER: THE REJECTION
OFEVERYTHING IN THE CITY AND THE SOUL THUS FAR . . . . .. 97 C. BOOK IX:
CONVENTIONAL EDUCATION AS A PATH TO THE LOVE OF LEARNING . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. 100 VII. RESPONSE TO NUSSBAUM #3: PLATO GOES BEYOND TRAGEDY BOOKS
VI AND VII: THE HIGH ROAD WITHIN TLLE CITY. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 105
A. THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL AND THE DESIRE TO KNOW 105 B. MIND AS A
NATURAL POWER OF SOUL, PRESENT FROM BIRTH 107 C. THE EDUEATION OFTHE
PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 109 D. THE
REPUBLIC AND THE DIVIDED LIL1E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .. 113 VIII. SOCRATES AS THE PHILOSOPHICAI RULERLEDUCATOR . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 119 A. GLAUEON AND ADEIMANTUS ACEEPT THE
MODEL OFTHE SOUL AS IRRATIONAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 119 B. GLAUEOL1 AND
ADEIMANTUS ARE NOT EXAMINING THEIR LIVES OR ASSUMPTIONS ,. .. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . .. 121 C. EDUCATING ADEIMANTUS , 121
D. ADEIMANTUS DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL AND CITY , 124
E. EDUCATING GLAUCON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .. 127 F. SOCRATES AND THE DIVINE IMAGE IN THE
HUMAN SOUL. . . . . . . . . . .. 131 G. SOCRATES RELATIONSHIP TO
GLAUCON AND ADEIMANTUS; THE IMAGE OF THE CAVE . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 133
H. THE IMAGE OFTHE IDEAL CITY IN BOOKS LI-IV, VI, AND VII IS, OR COULD
BE, ATHENS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .. 136 I. PHILOSOPHICAL RULING AND THE POWER OFTHC MIND ,
138 IX. THE DISCUSSION OF HOMER IN THE REPUBLIC: SOCRATES EFTUERT TO
REEDUCATE THE YOUTH , 141 A. BOOK 11AND III . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. 143 1.
MISREADING HOMER AND ADVOCATING CENSORSHIP , 143 2. ANALOGIES BETWEEN
PLATO S DIALOGUES AND HOMER . . . . . . . . . . .. 145 B. BOOK X: MORE
ANALOGIES BETWEEN PLATO AND HOMCR 148 C. UNPHILOSOPHICAL POETRY AND THE
DIVIDED LINE: POETS AT THREE REMOVES FROM REALITY , 149 D. BOOK VI , . .
. . .. 152 1. PHILOSOPHICAL POETRY AND THE DIVIDED LINE . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .. 152 2. HOMER AND PLATO AS PHILOSOPHICAL POETS , 153 E.
PLATO S CRITICISM OF HOMER IN REPUBLIC VI VERSUS REPUBLIC X . . . . ..
154 F. PLATO S CRITICISMS OFHOMER ALSO APPLY TO PLATO. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 156 1. AN ACTIVE LIFE IS SUPERIOR TO A CONTEMPLATIVE LIFE
AND ACTION IS SUPERIOR TO TEACHING; PLATO DID NOT THINK SO . . . . . . .
. . . . .. 156 2. HOMER CANNOT PROVE HIS WORK HAS MADE PEOPLE BETTER;
NEITHER CAN PLATO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .. 157 3. HOMER DID NOT SET UP AN ISOLATED COMMUNITY
BASED ON A HOMERIC WAY OF LIFE; NEITHER DID PLATO . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. 158 4. HOMER DID NOT ACHIEVE WORLDLY SUCCESS; NEITHER DID
SOCRATES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .. 159 5. HOMER WANDERED AROUND AS A RHAPSODE;
SOCRATES WANDERED AROUND AS A DIALECTICIAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 160 6. GLAUCON S AND THE ATHENIANS
INABILITY TO READ HOMER CATHARTIEALIY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 160 7. IRRATIONAL DESIRES
AND POLITIEAL REPRESSION: THE CENSORSHIP OFHOMER 162 X. SOCRATES
CREATION OFRATIONAL ART. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .. 165 A. THE IMAGES OF THE TWO ROADS, THE DIVIDED UNE, AND THE CAVE
. . . . 165 B. THE MYTH OF ER: AN EXAMPLE OF DIALECTIEAL RHETORIE . . .
. . . . . . . .. 166 I. THE SOUL IS REWARDED OR PUNISHED ON THE BASIS OF
ITS CHOICES .. 167 2. EDUCATION ENABLES THE SOUL TO CHOOSE WEII . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .. 169 3. THE EDUCATION OFHABITS WILL NOT ENABLE THE
SOUL TO CHOOSE WEIL; THE EDUCATION AND LAWS IN BOOKS LI-V WILL NOT
CHANGE THE SOUL OR EDUCATE THE MIND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .. 169 4. ONLY THE EDUCATION IN BOOKS VI AND VII, THE
EDUCATION OFTHE MIND, WILL ENABLE THE SOUL TO MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICES .
.. , .. 171 XI. SOCRATES AS THE PHILOSOPHIEAL RULER THROUGHOUT THE
REPUBLIC . . . . . . .. 173 A. SOCRATES IS EXERCISING THE RATIONAL
POWERS OF THE SOUL THROUGHOUT THE DIALOGUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 B. THE PHILOSOPHIEAL RULER . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 173 C.
THE REPUBLIC AS ONE PART OF AN EDUCATION OF RATIONAL INTUITION .... 176
D. THE REPUBLIC AS A TRAGEDY. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .. . . . . .. 181 E. THE REPUBLIC AS A CITY (THE SOUL) WITHIN A CITY
(REPUBLIC) WITHIN A CITY (IN CEPHALUS HOUSE) WITHIN A CITY (ATHENS)
WITHIN A CITY (THE READER S OWN CITY) 183 XII. RESPONSE TO NUSSBAUM.
THE REPUBLIC: TRUE VALUE AND THE STANDPOINT OF PERFEETION . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 187 A. DIFFERENT
ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
187 B. NUSSBAUM ON THE DEMOCRATIC PERSONALITY IN BOOK VIII , 190 C.
NUSSBAUM ON THE MODELS OF SOUL IN BOOKS IV AND IX , 194 D. LOGISTILWN
AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIFE , 197 E. NUSSBAUM ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL
IN BOOKS VI AND VII , 201 F. NUSSBAUM ON PLATO S ASPIRATION TO A LIFE
OF VIT1UE WITHOUT FRAGILITY , 205 G. NUSSBAUM ON PLATO S CRITICISMS
OFHOMER IN THE REPUBLIC , 208 H. NUSSBAUM ON PLATO S ELITISM . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 209 XIII. CONCLUSION:
MARTHA VERSUS MARTHA , 213 XIV. EPILOGUE: TEACHING PLATO S REPUBLIC IN
2004 IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , 215 A. THE
PHILOSOPHICAL RULER , 217 1. PHILOSOPHICAL COURAGE , 217 2.
PHILOSOPHICAL TEMPERANCE , 218 3. PHILOSOPHICAL RULING AND THE NATURAL
DESIRE TO KNOW . . . . . . .. 219 4. PHILOSOPHICAL RULING AND
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS , 221 5. PHILOSOPHICAL RELIGION. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 222 6. PHILOSOPHICAL
JUSTICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. 223 7. PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION , 224 B. RECENT TRENDS IN PLATONIC
SCHOLARSHIP AS THEY APPLY IN 2004 , 226 C. TRAGEDY IN THE UNITED STATES
SINCE 9/11 228 D. THE CITY (SOUL) WITHIN THE CITY (REPUBLIC) WITHIN
THE CITY (CEPHALUS HOUSE) WITHIN THE CITY (ATHENS) WITHIN THE CITY
..... , 231 BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 235 GENERAL INDEX. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .. 251 INDEX OF PASSAGES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253
|
| adam_txt |
TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFAEE: DR. MARK MOES . FOREWORD: DR. PATRICK HENRY.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V
AEKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VII I. INTRODUCTION , . II. NUSSBAUM'S
POSITION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 5 A. NUSSBAUM: PLATO IS ANTI- TRAGIE . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. NUSSBAUM: PLATO'S WRITING
STYLE IS LINKED TO A VIEW OFHUMAN RATIONALITY, ARTICULATED MOST CLEARLY
IN THE REPUBLIC, THAT IS DETAEHED FROM EMOTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 C. NUSSBAUM: PLATO
COMPLETELY CHANGES HIS MIND IN THE PHAEDRUS . . 7 III. RESPONSE TO
NUSSBAUM #1: PLATO'S VIEW DID NOT CHANGE, OR CHANGE AS RADIEALLY, AS
NUSSBAUM CLAIMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 A.
CREATING A DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE DIALOGUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 9 B. THE EDUEATION IN THE REPUBLIC TRAINS THE MIND TO SEE
CONNECTIONS; A DIALECTICALLY TRAINCD MIND CAN ACHIEVE A UNIFIED VISION.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 10 C. CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE PROTAGORAS,
REPUBLIC, PHAEDRUS AND SYMPOSIUM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 IV. RESPONSE TO
NUSSBAUM #2: PLATO IS NOT ANTI-TRAGIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
A. PLATO AND TRAGEDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 B. ARISTOTIC'S CRITERIA FOR TRAGEDY . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 1. PLOT IS THE
MOST IMPORTANT ASPCCT OFTRAGEDY, THE SOUL OFA TRAGEDY; THE TRAGIC
CONTEXT, OR PLOT, OF THE REPUBLIC . . . . . . . . . 18 2. ARISTOTIE'S
OTHER CRITERIA FOR TRAGEDY AND PLATO'S DIALOGUES . . . 23 43 45 42 48
48 48 52 54 57 57 57 26 31 31 33 36 3. THRASYMACHUS: NOT BLIND, BUT
IGNORANT AND UNTEACHABLE . A. JUSTICE AS "THE ADVANTAGE OFTHE STRONGER;"
. B. TRAGEDY AND THRASYMACHUS' LIFE . C. SOCRATES' PHILOSOPHIEAL
REINTERPRETATION OFTHRASYMACHUS' DEFINITION , 70 2. POLYMARCHUS: BLIND
BUT TEACHABLE . A. "HELPING FRIENDS AND HARMING ENEMIES;" . B. THE
TRAGEDY OF POLYMARCHUS' LIFE . C. SOCRATES' PHILOSOPHIEAL
REINTERPRETATION OFPOLYMARCHUS' DEFINITION , 61 63 63 68 C. CONNECTIONS
BETWEEN TRAGEDY AND PLALO'S DIALOGUES IN RECENT SCHOLARSHIP . V. TRAGEDY
IN THE REPUBLIC. BOOK 1 . A. THE SETTING AND CONTEXT FORESHADOW THE
TRAGEDY TO COME . I. THE REPUBLIC AND THE DEMOCRATIC PERSONALITY . 2.
THE DECIINE OF REGIMES . 3. THE CITY (SOUL) WITHIN THE CITY (REPUBLIC)
WITHIN THE CITY (CEPHALUS' HOUSE) WITHIN THE CITY (ATHENS) WITHIN THE
CITY . 4. THE SPIRIT OF THE LAW VERSUS THE LETTER OFTHE LAW IN ATHENS:
A LEGAL DEMOCRACY AND A SPIRITUAL TYRANNY . B. SOCRATES' DESCENT TO THE
PIRAEUS: THE JUSTICE OFTHE PHILOSOPHER . C. DEFINITIONS OF JUSTIEE IN
BOOK 1: THE LOW ROAD AND THE HIGH ROAD . I. CEPHALUS: BLIND AND
UNTEACHABLE . A. "TELLING THE TRUTH AND GIVING BACK WHAL IS OWED" . B.
TRAGEDY AND CEPHAIUS' LIFE . C. SOCRATES' PHILOSOPHIEAL REINTERPRETATION
OFCEPHALUS' DEFINITIONS OFTHE "TRUTH" ABOUT LIFE AND JUSTICE . D. THE
REPUBLIC BOOK 1 AND TRAGEDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . 74 I. ARISTOTLE'S CRITERIA FOR TRAGEDYAS LITERATURE . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . 74 2. A TRAGIC WORLDVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 3. REEENT SEHOLARSHIP ON PLATO
AND TRAGEDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4. THE TITLE,
"REPUBLIC", IS IRONIE AND TRAGIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
VI. THE LOW ROAD: BOOKS LI-V AND VIII-IX. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 83 A. BOOKS LI-IV: THE FOUNDING OF A CITY. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 I. THE LOW ROAD: THE LUXURIOUS
CITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 2. THE LOW ROAD: THE
EDUCATION OFHABITS ONLY. . . . . . . . 86 3. THE LOW ROAD: COURAGE,
MODERATION, JUSTIEE, AND WISDOM . . . 88 4. THE LOW ROAD: THE
THREE-PART, HARMONIZED SOUL. . . . . . . . . . 92 B. BOOK V: TAKING THE
IRRATIONAL MODEL OF THE SOUL TO ITS LOGICAI CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
93 1. THE LOW ROAD: THE EQUALITY OFWOMEN. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 93 2. THE LOW ROAD: THE COMMUNITY OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN . . . . 94
3. SOERATES' INTRODUETION OFTHE PHILOSOPHICAL RULER: THE REJECTION
OFEVERYTHING IN THE CITY AND THE SOUL THUS FAR . . . . . 97 C. BOOK IX:
CONVENTIONAL EDUCATION AS A PATH TO THE LOVE OF LEARNING . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 100 VII. RESPONSE TO NUSSBAUM #3: PLATO GOES BEYOND TRAGEDY BOOKS
VI AND VII: THE HIGH ROAD WITHIN TLLE CITY. . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
A. THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL AND THE DESIRE TO KNOW " 105 B. MIND AS A
NATURAL POWER OF SOUL, PRESENT FROM BIRTH " 107 C. THE EDUEATION OFTHE
PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 D. THE
REPUBLIC AND THE DIVIDED LIL1E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 113 VIII. SOCRATES AS THE PHILOSOPHICAI RULERLEDUCATOR . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 A. GLAUEON AND ADEIMANTUS ACEEPT THE
MODEL OFTHE SOUL AS IRRATIONAI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 B. GLAUEOL1 AND
ADEIMANTUS ARE NOT EXAMINING THEIR LIVES OR ASSUMPTIONS ,. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 C. EDUCATING ADEIMANTUS , 121
D. ADEIMANTUS DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL AND CITY , 124
E. EDUCATING GLAUCON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . 127 F. SOCRATES AND THE "DIVINE IMAGE" IN THE
HUMAN SOUL. . . . . . . . . . . 131 G. SOCRATES' RELATIONSHIP TO
GLAUCON AND ADEIMANTUS; THE IMAGE OF THE CAVE . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
H. THE IMAGE OFTHE "IDEAL CITY" IN BOOKS LI-IV, VI, AND VII IS, OR COULD
BE, ATHENS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 136 I. PHILOSOPHICAL RULING AND THE POWER OFTHC MIND ,
138 IX. THE DISCUSSION OF HOMER IN THE REPUBLIC: SOCRATES' EFTUERT TO
REEDUCATE THE YOUTH , 141 A. BOOK 11AND III . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 1.
MISREADING HOMER AND ADVOCATING CENSORSHIP , 143 2. ANALOGIES BETWEEN
PLATO'S DIALOGUES AND HOMER . . . . . . . . . . . 145 B. BOOK X: MORE
ANALOGIES BETWEEN PLATO AND HOMCR 148 C. UNPHILOSOPHICAL POETRY AND THE
DIVIDED LINE: POETS AT THREE REMOVES FROM REALITY , 149 D. BOOK VI , . .
. . . 152 1. PHILOSOPHICAL POETRY AND THE DIVIDED LINE . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 152 2. HOMER AND PLATO AS PHILOSOPHICAL POETS , 153 E.
PLATO' S CRITICISM OF HOMER IN REPUBLIC VI VERSUS REPUBLIC X . . . . .
154 F. PLATO'S CRITICISMS OFHOMER ALSO APPLY TO PLATO. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . 156 1. AN ACTIVE LIFE IS SUPERIOR TO A CONTEMPLATIVE LIFE
AND ACTION IS SUPERIOR TO TEACHING; PLATO DID NOT THINK SO . . . . . . .
. . . . . 156 2. HOMER CANNOT PROVE HIS WORK HAS MADE PEOPLE BETTER;
NEITHER CAN PLATO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 157 3. HOMER DID NOT SET UP AN ISOLATED COMMUNITY
BASED ON A HOMERIC WAY OF LIFE; NEITHER DID PLATO . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . 158 4. HOMER DID NOT ACHIEVE WORLDLY SUCCESS; NEITHER DID
SOCRATES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . 159 5. HOMER WANDERED AROUND AS A RHAPSODE;
SOCRATES WANDERED AROUND AS A DIALECTICIAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 6. GLAUCON'S AND THE ATHENIANS'
INABILITY TO READ HOMER CATHARTIEALIY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 7. IRRATIONAL DESIRES
AND POLITIEAL REPRESSION: THE CENSORSHIP OFHOMER 162 X. SOCRATES'
CREATION OFRATIONAL ART. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 165 A. THE IMAGES OF THE TWO ROADS, THE DIVIDED UNE, AND THE CAVE
. . . . 165 B. THE MYTH OF ER: AN EXAMPLE OF DIALECTIEAL RHETORIE . . .
. . . . . . . . 166 I. THE SOUL IS REWARDED OR PUNISHED ON THE BASIS OF
ITS CHOICES . 167 2. EDUCATION ENABLES THE SOUL TO CHOOSE WEII . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . 169 3. THE EDUCATION OFHABITS WILL NOT ENABLE THE
SOUL TO CHOOSE WEIL; THE EDUCATION AND LAWS IN BOOKS LI-V WILL NOT
CHANGE THE SOUL OR EDUCATE THE MIND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 169 4. ONLY THE EDUCATION IN BOOKS VI AND VII, THE
EDUCATION OFTHE MIND, WILL ENABLE THE SOUL TO MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICES '.'
. , . 171 XI. SOCRATES AS THE PHILOSOPHIEAL RULER THROUGHOUT THE
REPUBLIC . . . . . . . 173 A. SOCRATES IS EXERCISING THE RATIONAL
POWERS OF THE SOUL THROUGHOUT THE DIALOGUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 B. THE PHILOSOPHIEAL RULER . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 C.
THE REPUBLIC AS ONE PART OF AN EDUCATION OF RATIONAL INTUITION . 176
D. THE REPUBLIC AS A TRAGEDY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 181 E. THE REPUBLIC AS A CITY (THE SOUL) WITHIN A CITY
(REPUBLIC) WITHIN A CITY (IN CEPHALUS' HOUSE) WITHIN A CITY (ATHENS)
WITHIN A CITY (THE READER'S OWN CITY) 183 XII. RESPONSE TO NUSSBAUM.
"THE REPUBLIC:" TRUE VALUE AND THE STANDPOINT OF PERFEETION . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 A. DIFFERENT
ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
187 B. NUSSBAUM ON THE DEMOCRATIC PERSONALITY IN BOOK VIII , 190 C.
NUSSBAUM ON THE MODELS OF SOUL IN BOOKS IV AND IX , 194 D. LOGISTILWN
AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL LIFE , 197 E. NUSSBAUM ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOUL
IN BOOKS VI AND VII , 201 F. NUSSBAUM ON PLATO'S ASPIRATION TO A LIFE
OF"VIT1UE WITHOUT FRAGILITY" , 205 G. NUSSBAUM ON PLATO'S CRITICISMS
OFHOMER IN THE REPUBLIC , 208 H. NUSSBAUM ON PLATO'S ELITISM . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 XIII. CONCLUSION:
MARTHA VERSUS MARTHA , 213 XIV. EPILOGUE: TEACHING PLATO'S REPUBLIC IN
2004 IN THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , 215 A. THE
PHILOSOPHICAL RULER , 217 1. PHILOSOPHICAL COURAGE , 217 2.
PHILOSOPHICAL TEMPERANCE , 218 3. PHILOSOPHICAL RULING AND THE NATURAL
DESIRE TO KNOW . . . . . . . 219 4. PHILOSOPHICAL RULING AND
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS , 221 5. PHILOSOPHICAL RELIGION. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 6. PHILOSOPHICAL
JUSTICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 223 7. PHILOSOPHICAL EDUCATION , 224 B. RECENT TRENDS IN PLATONIC
SCHOLARSHIP AS THEY APPLY IN 2004 , 226 C. TRAGEDY IN THE UNITED STATES
SINCE 9/11 " 228 D. THE CITY (SOUL) WITHIN THE CITY (REPUBLIC) WITHIN
THE CITY (CEPHALUS' HOUSE) WITHIN THE CITY (ATHENS) WITHIN THE CITY
. , 231 BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 GENERAL INDEX. . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 251 INDEX OF PASSAGES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Beck, Martha C. |
| author_facet | Beck, Martha C. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Beck, Martha C. |
| author_variant | m c b mc mcb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV022270685 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)635160896 (DE-599)BVBBV022270685 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01284nam a2200349 cc4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022270685</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20070523 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070214s2006 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0773459235</subfield><subfield code="9">0-7734-5923-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780773459236</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-7734-5923-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)635160896</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022270685</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beck, Martha C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tragedy and the philosophical life</subfield><subfield code="b">a response to Martha Nussbaum</subfield><subfield code="n">2</subfield><subfield code="p">The Republic</subfield><subfield code="c">Martha C. Beck</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Lewiston [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Mellen</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IX, 255 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Plato</subfield><subfield code="d">v427-v347</subfield><subfield code="t">Res publica</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076164-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Plato</subfield><subfield code="d">v427-v347</subfield><subfield code="t">Res publica</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076164-2</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV022270671</subfield><subfield code="g">2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">V:DE-604</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015481174&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015481174</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV022270685 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T16:46:03Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:53:48Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0773459235 9780773459236 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015481174 |
| oclc_num | 635160896 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 |
| physical | IX, 255 S. |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Mellen |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Beck, Martha C. Verfasser aut Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum 2 The Republic Martha C. Beck Lewiston [u.a.] Mellen 2006 IX, 255 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Plato v427-v347 Res publica (DE-588)4076164-2 gnd rswk-swf Plato v427-v347 Res publica (DE-588)4076164-2 u DE-604 (DE-604)BV022270671 2 V:DE-604 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015481174&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Beck, Martha C. Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum Plato v427-v347 Res publica (DE-588)4076164-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4076164-2 |
| title | Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum |
| title_auth | Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum |
| title_exact_search | Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum |
| title_full | Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum 2 The Republic Martha C. Beck |
| title_fullStr | Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum 2 The Republic Martha C. Beck |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tragedy and the philosophical life a response to Martha Nussbaum 2 The Republic Martha C. Beck |
| title_short | Tragedy and the philosophical life |
| title_sort | tragedy and the philosophical life a response to martha nussbaum the republic |
| title_sub | a response to Martha Nussbaum |
| topic | Plato v427-v347 Res publica (DE-588)4076164-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Plato v427-v347 Res publica |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015481174&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV022270671 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT beckmarthac tragedyandthephilosophicallifearesponsetomarthanussbaum2 |