Private international law and the Internet:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Alphen an den Rijn
Kluwer Law Internat.
2007
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XXI, 440 S. |
ISBN: | 9041125167 9789041125163 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV022245154 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20180419 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 070129s2007 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9041125167 |9 90-411-2516-7 | ||
020 | |a 9789041125163 |9 978-90-411-2516-3 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)255976909 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV022245154 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-29 |a DE-384 |a DE-739 |a DE-703 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a K7625 | |
082 | 0 | |a 343.09944 | |
084 | |a PT 319 |0 (DE-625)139857: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a PZ 3200 |0 (DE-625)141165: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 2 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)114487730X |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Private international law and the Internet |c Dan Jerker B. Svantesson |
264 | 1 | |a Alphen an den Rijn |b Kluwer Law Internat. |c 2007 | |
300 | |a XXI, 440 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws | |
650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws |x Jurisdiction | |
650 | 4 | |a Internet |x Law and legislation | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internet |0 (DE-588)4308416-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationales Privatrecht |0 (DE-588)4027446-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |8 1\p |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Internet |0 (DE-588)4308416-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Internationales Privatrecht |0 (DE-588)4027446-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015456026&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015456026 | ||
883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804136238779727872 |
---|---|
adam_text | PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE INTERNET DR. DAN JERKER B. SVANTESSON
B.A. (LTU, SWEDEN), M.A. (LTU, SWEDEN), LL.M. (UNSW, AUSTRALIA) PH.D.
(UNSW, AUSTRALIA) KLUWERLAW INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD
XIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS XVII SELECTEDABBREVIATIONS XIX CHAPTERL
INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE IDEA IN FOCUS: THE BORDERLESS INTERNET - FROM
THE ILLUSION OF A NO MAN S LAND TO THE REALITY OF AN EVERY MAN S
LAND 2 II. THE SUBSTANTIVE FOCUS 3 A. ISSUES 4 1. JURISDICTION 5 2.
DECLINING JURISDICTION 8 3. CHOICEOFLAW 9 4. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT
OF JUDGMENTS 10 B. AREASOFLAW 11 1. CONTRACTS 11 2. CONSUMER CONTRACTS
12 VI III. IV. 3. THE TORT OFDEFAMATION 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
CONTRACTS AND TORTS THE JURISDICTIONAL FOCUS A. AUSTRALIA B. ENGLAND C.
GERMANY D. HONGKONGSAR E. SWEDEN F. THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC)
G. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (US) H. THE CHOSEN MIX OF STATES
COMMENTS ON THE TERMINOLOGY A. PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, CONFLICT OF
LAWS OR JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES? B. IT LAW, CYBERSPACE LAW OR INTERNET LAW
C. THE RELEVANT ACTORS D. SERVERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 12 14 14 15 15 15 16
16 16 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 CHAPTER2 APPROACHING THE INTERNET 25 I. THE
INTERNET S CHARACTERISTICS 29 A. BORDERLESSNESS 30 B. GEOGRAPHICAL
INDEPENDENCE 31 C. LIMITED LANGUAGE DEPENDENCE 34 D. ONE-TO-MANY 34 E.
LOW THRESHOLD INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 35 F. WIDELYUSED 36 G PORTABILITY
37 H. LACK OF RELIABLE GEOGRAPHICAL IDENTIFIERS 39 I. REACTIVE NATURE 40
J. LACK OF CENTRAL CONTROL 43 K. CONVERGENCE 44 II. CONSEQUENCES OF THE
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNET COMMUNICATION 45 A. CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES IN GENERAL 46 B. CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES IN CONTRACTS 49 C. CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES IN THE TORT OF DEFAMATION 49 III. CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS 53 TABLE OF CONTENTS VII CHAPTER3 APPROACHING PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW 55 I. UNILATERALISM AND MULTILATERALISM 56 II.
DESIRABLE QUALITIES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW RULES 58 A. LEGITIMATE
PARTY EXPECTATIONS 64 1. THE RELATION BETWEEN PREDICTABILITY AND
FLEXIBILITY 66 2. CONTRACTS 68 3. DEFAMATION 73 B. POLICY FULFILMENT 74
C. EFFICIENCY 78 D. SIMPLICITY 78 E. SUITABLE LEVEL OF GENERALIZATION 79
F. ABUSE-RESISTANCE 80 G. NON-VIOLATION OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 81
1. THE STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 83 2. INTERNATIONAL
CUSTOMS 84 H. FORUM-NEUTRAL LANGUAGE 90 III. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS 90
CHAPTER4 TRADITIONAL COMMON LAW: AUSTRALIA, ENGLAND AND HONG KONG SAR 91
I. JURISDICTION 92 A. CONTRACTS 98 1. LIMITS ON EXCLUSIVE FORUM
SELECTION 99 B. DEFAMATION 101 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 108 A. FORUM
NON CONVENIENS 108 B. LIS ALIBI PENDENS 121 C. INEFFECTIVENESS 122 III.
CHOICEOFLAW 122 A. CONTRACTS 123 1. LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE
LAW 124 B. DEFAMATION 125 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 130 CHAPTER5
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 133 I. JURISDICTION 133 A. CONTRACTS 142 1.
LIMITS ON EXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION 145 VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS B.
DEFAMATION 145 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 151 A. FORUM NON CONVENIENS
151 B. LIS ALIBI PENDENS 153 III. CHOICEOFLAW 153 A. CONTRACTS 154 1.
LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE LAW 155 B. DEFAMATION 156 IV.
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 157 CHAPTEROE EUROPEAN CIVIL LAW: GERMANY AND
SWEDEN 161 I. JURISDICTION 162 A. CONTRACTS 166 1. LIMITS ON FORUM
SELECTION 168 B. DEFAMATION 170 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 173 A. FORUM
NON CONVENIENS 173 B. LIS ALIBI PENDENS 114 C. INEFFECTIVENESS 175 III.
CHOICEOFLAW 175 A. CONTRACTS 176 1. LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE
LAW 178 B. DEFAMATION 178 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 180 CHAPTER7
THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 183 I. JURISDICTION 184 A. DEFINITION OF
SHEWAI CASES 186 B. CONTRACTS 187 1. LIMITS ON EXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION
188 C. DEFAMATION 193 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 196 III. CHOICEOFLAW
197 A. CONTRACTS 199 1. LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE LAW 201 B.
DEFAMATION 202 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 205 TABLE OF CONTENTS IX
CHAPTER8 INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS 209 I. THE RELEVANT EUROPEAN
INSTRUMENTS 209 A. BRUESSELS I REGULATION 210 B. BRUESSELS
CONVENTION/LUGANO CONVENTION 215 C. ROME CONVENTION/ROME I REGULATION
218 D. ROME II REGULATION 225 E. DIRECTIVE ON UNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER
CONTRACTS 228 F. E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE 230 II. THE RELEVANT HAGUE
CONVENTIONS 231 A. THE HAGUE CONVENTION 1955 231 B. THE PREVIOUSLY
PROPOSED HAGUE CONVENTION ON JURISDICTION AND FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL
AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS 232 1. AN OVERVIEW 233 2. THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS
234 3. SOME WORDS ABOUT THE NEGOTIATIONS PROCESS 234 4. THE FUTURE OF
THE JUDGMENTS PROJECT 235 C. THE HAGUE CONVENTION 2005 ON CHOICE OF
COURT AGREEMENTS 235 III. OTHER INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS OF RELEVANCE
240 A. UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SAELE
OFGOODS 1980 241 B. NEW YORK CONVENTION 1958 242 C. CHARTER OF THE
UNITED NATIONS 242 D. INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL
RIGHTS (ICCPR) 249 1. ALPERT S ICCPR CHALLENGE TO AUSTRALIAN
JURISDICTION 250 2. EXHAUSTION 251 3. JURISDICTION 252 4. SUBSTANTIVE
DISPUTE 253 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS 254 CHAPTER9 A CRITIQUE OF CURRENT
RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 257 I. RULES OF JURISDICTION 258 A.
UNINTERESTING AND UNCONTROVERSIAL JURISDICTIONAL GROUNDS 258 B.
UNINTERESTING BUT CONTROVERSIAL JURISDICTIONAL GROUNDS 259 C. US
DOCTRINE OF GENERAL JURISDICTION 260 D. SUBMISSION 260 1. SUBMISSION
AFTER THE DISPUTE ARISES 261 2. CONTRACT NOMINATING FORUM (SUBMISSION
BEFORE THE DISPUTE ARISES) 261 3. THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF
COURT AGREEMENTS 262 X TABLE OF CONTENTS E. THE LOCATION OF CONTRACT
FORMATION 265 F. THE APPLICABLE LAW BEING THE LAW OF THE FORUM 267 G.
THE LOCATION OF CONTRACT PERFORMANCE 267 H. CONTRACT BREACHED WITHIN THE
FORUM 268 I. LOCATION OF OBJECT OF LITIGATION 268 J. US CONTRACTUAL
SPECIFIC JURISDICTION 269 K. THE PLACE OF THE WRONGFUL ACT AND THE PLACE
OF HARM 269 1. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP ONE 271 2. JURISDICTION
EXERCISED OVER STEP TWO 272 3. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP THREE
274 4. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP FOUR 280 5. EXTENT OF
PLAINTIFF S REPUTATION 281 6. ENFORCEMENT DIFFICULTIES 282 7. PRIOR
NOTICE (FORESEEABILITY) 284 8. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP FIVE 288
9. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP SIX 289 10. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
IN RELATION TO JURISDICTION BASED ON PLACE OF WRONG/PLACE OF HARM 290 L.
PLAINTIFF S HABITUAL RESIDENCE OR DOMICILE 291 M. THE LOCATION OF THE
SERVER 291 N. US EFFECTS TEST 292 O. PLAINTIFF S LOCATION WHEN OBSERVING
THE INFRINGEMENT 292 P. INJUNCTIONS 292 Q. DETAINABLE PROPERTY WITHIN
THE FORUM STATE 293 R. REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE/BRANCH 294 II. RULES OF
DECLINING JURISDICTION 294 A. FORUM NON CONVENIENS 295 1. HOW CAN JUDGES
TAKE AWAY WHAT THE LAWMAKERS HAVE GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF? 296 2. TOO
MUCH DISCRETION 296 3. LACK OF UNIFORMITY 299 4. DELAYS THE PROCESS 299
5. CASE-SHOPPING USED TO EASE THE COURTS WORKLOAD 300 6.
CASE-SHOPPING USED TO PROTECT DOMESTIC INTERESTS 300 7. DISCRETION TO
UPHOLD CHOICE OF FORUM CLAUSES NOMINATING A FOREIGN FORUM 301 8.
CONDITIONAL EXERCISE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS 302 9. FORUM NON
CONVENIENS: CLEARLY INAPPROPRIATE FOR INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS 304 10.
FORUM NON CONVENIENS: SUPERFLUOUS IF JURISDICTIONAL RULES ARE REASONABLE
304 11. THE DOCTRINE IS EASILY CIRCUMVENTED 305 12. THE DOCTRINE HAS
LOST ITS MEANING IN MODERN SOCIETY 305 13. CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE
DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS 306 TABLE OF CONTENTS XI B. LIS ALIBI
PENDENS 307 C. INEFFECTIVENESS 307 III. RULES OF CHOICEOFLAW 308 A.
CONTRACT DESIGNATED LAW 308 B. CLOSEST CONNECTION 308 C.
LAWOFBUYER SDOMICILE 309 D. LEXFORI 310 E. LEX LOCI DELICTI (COMMISSI)
310 F. THE DOUBLE ACTIONABILITY TEST AND ITS FLEXIBLE EXCEPTION 311 G
THE LAW OF THE PARTIES COMMON HABITUAL RESIDENCE 312 IV. RULES OF
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 312 A. NO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 312 B.
CONVENTION-BASED RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 313 C. RECIPROCITY 313 D.
RESTRICTED RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 314 V. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
315 CHAPTERLO GEO-IDENTIFICATION: TECHNOLOGY TO THE RESCUE? 319 I.
INTERNET ARCHITECTURE, REGULATION AND BORDERS 319 II. GEO-LOCATION
TECHNOLOGIES 321 A. SOPHISTICATED GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES 322 1.
ACCURACY 324 2. FALSE POSITIVES AND/OR FALSE NEGATIVES 329 3. THE FUTURE
OF SOPHISTICATED GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES 331 B. UNSOPHISTICATED
GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES 334 C. GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES IN PRACTICE
335 III. SOFT PROTECTION : NON-TECHNICAL MEANS OF GEOGRAPHICAL
IDENTIFICATION 338 A. DISCLAIMERS 340 B. CLICK-WRAP AGREEMENTS 341 C.
MENUES: THE BETTER AND WORST ALTERNATIVE 342 D. DELIVERY ADDRESS 343 1.
DIGITIZED PRODUCTS 344 E. OFFLINE IDENTIFICATION 345 F. SOFT
PROTECTION IN PRACTICE 345 IV. GEO-IDENTIFICATION: AQUESTION
OFATTITUDES 347 V. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS 351 XII TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTERLL PROPOSED DEFAMATION CONVENTION MODEL 353 I. STRUCTURE OF THE
MODELS 354 II. INTRODUCTION TO THE DEFAMATION MODEL 354 III. BASIC
FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED MODEL 355 IV. ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE 357 V. PUTTING
THE DEFAMATION MODEL TO THE TEST 375 CHAPTERL2 PROPOSED CONTRACTS
CONVENTION MODEL 379 I. BASIC FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED MODEL 379 II.
ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE 380 III. PUTTING THE CONTRACTS MODEL TO THE TEST
396 CHAPTERL3 CONCLUDING REMARKS 399 SELECTEDBIBLIOGRAPHY 403 TABLE
OFAUTHORITIES 415 INDEX 427
|
adam_txt |
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE INTERNET DR. DAN JERKER B. SVANTESSON
B.A. (LTU, SWEDEN), M.A. (LTU, SWEDEN), LL.M. (UNSW, AUSTRALIA) PH.D.
(UNSW, AUSTRALIA) KLUWERLAW INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD
XIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS XVII SELECTEDABBREVIATIONS XIX CHAPTERL
INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE IDEA IN FOCUS: THE 'BORDERLESS' INTERNET - FROM
THE ILLUSION OF A 'NO MAN'S LAND' TO THE REALITY OF AN 'EVERY MAN'S
LAND' 2 II. THE SUBSTANTIVE FOCUS 3 A. ISSUES 4 1. JURISDICTION 5 2.
DECLINING JURISDICTION 8 3. CHOICEOFLAW 9 4. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT
OF JUDGMENTS 10 B. AREASOFLAW 11 1. CONTRACTS 11 2. CONSUMER CONTRACTS
12 VI III. IV. 3. THE TORT OFDEFAMATION 4. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
CONTRACTS AND TORTS THE JURISDICTIONAL FOCUS A. AUSTRALIA B. ENGLAND C.
GERMANY D. HONGKONGSAR E. SWEDEN F. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (PRC)
G. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (US) H. THE CHOSEN MIX OF STATES
COMMENTS ON THE TERMINOLOGY A. PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, CONFLICT OF
LAWS OR JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES? B. IT LAW, CYBERSPACE LAW OR INTERNET LAW
C. THE RELEVANT ACTORS D. SERVERS TABLE OF CONTENTS 12 14 14 15 15 15 16
16 16 18 19 19 20 21 22 23 CHAPTER2 APPROACHING THE INTERNET 25 I. THE
INTERNET'S CHARACTERISTICS 29 A. BORDERLESSNESS 30 B. GEOGRAPHICAL
INDEPENDENCE 31 C. LIMITED LANGUAGE DEPENDENCE 34 D. ONE-TO-MANY 34 E.
LOW THRESHOLD INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION 35 F. WIDELYUSED 36 G PORTABILITY
37 H. LACK OF RELIABLE GEOGRAPHICAL IDENTIFIERS 39 I. REACTIVE NATURE 40
J. LACK OF CENTRAL CONTROL 43 K. CONVERGENCE 44 II. CONSEQUENCES OF THE
CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNET COMMUNICATION 45 A. CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES IN GENERAL 46 B. CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES IN CONTRACTS 49 C. CONSEQUENCES FOR THE
JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES IN THE TORT OF DEFAMATION 49 III. CONCLUDING
OBSERVATIONS 53 TABLE OF CONTENTS VII CHAPTER3 APPROACHING PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW 55 I. UNILATERALISM AND MULTILATERALISM 56 II.
DESIRABLE QUALITIES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW RULES 58 A. LEGITIMATE
PARTY EXPECTATIONS 64 1. THE RELATION BETWEEN PREDICTABILITY AND
FLEXIBILITY 66 2. CONTRACTS 68 3. DEFAMATION 73 B. POLICY FULFILMENT 74
C. EFFICIENCY 78 D. SIMPLICITY 78 E. SUITABLE LEVEL OF GENERALIZATION 79
F. ABUSE-RESISTANCE 80 G. NON-VIOLATION OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 81
1. THE STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE 83 2. INTERNATIONAL
CUSTOMS 84 H. FORUM-NEUTRAL LANGUAGE 90 III. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS 90
CHAPTER4 TRADITIONAL COMMON LAW: AUSTRALIA, ENGLAND AND HONG KONG SAR 91
I. JURISDICTION 92 A. CONTRACTS 98 1. LIMITS ON EXCLUSIVE FORUM
SELECTION 99 B. DEFAMATION 101 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 108 A. FORUM
NON CONVENIENS 108 B. LIS ALIBI PENDENS 121 C. INEFFECTIVENESS 122 III.
CHOICEOFLAW 122 A. CONTRACTS 123 1. LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE
LAW 124 B. DEFAMATION 125 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 130 CHAPTER5
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 133 I. JURISDICTION 133 A. CONTRACTS 142 1.
LIMITS ON EXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION 145 VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS B.
DEFAMATION 145 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 151 A. FORUM NON CONVENIENS
151 B. LIS ALIBI PENDENS 153 III. CHOICEOFLAW 153 A. CONTRACTS 154 1.
LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE LAW 155 B. DEFAMATION 156 IV.
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 157 CHAPTEROE EUROPEAN CIVIL LAW: GERMANY AND
SWEDEN 161 I. JURISDICTION 162 A. CONTRACTS 166 1. LIMITS ON FORUM
SELECTION 168 B. DEFAMATION 170 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 173 A. FORUM
NON CONVENIENS 173 B. LIS ALIBI PENDENS 114 C. INEFFECTIVENESS 175 III.
CHOICEOFLAW 175 A. CONTRACTS 176 1. LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE
LAW 178 B. DEFAMATION 178 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 180 CHAPTER7
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA 183 I. JURISDICTION 184 A. DEFINITION OF
SHEWAI CASES 186 B. CONTRACTS 187 1. LIMITS ON EXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION
188 C. DEFAMATION 193 II. DECLINING JURISDICTION 196 III. CHOICEOFLAW
197 A. CONTRACTS 199 1. LIMITS ON THE SELECTION OFAPPLICABLE LAW 201 B.
DEFAMATION 202 IV. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 205 TABLE OF CONTENTS IX
CHAPTER8 INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS 209 I. THE RELEVANT EUROPEAN
INSTRUMENTS 209 A. BRUESSELS I REGULATION 210 B. BRUESSELS
CONVENTION/LUGANO CONVENTION 215 C. ROME CONVENTION/ROME I REGULATION
218 D. ROME II REGULATION 225 E. DIRECTIVE ON UNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER
CONTRACTS 228 F. E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE 230 II. THE RELEVANT HAGUE
CONVENTIONS 231 A. THE HAGUE CONVENTION 1955 231 B. THE PREVIOUSLY
PROPOSED HAGUE CONVENTION ON JURISDICTION AND FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL
AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS 232 1. AN OVERVIEW 233 2. THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS
234 3. SOME WORDS ABOUT THE NEGOTIATIONS PROCESS 234 4. THE FUTURE OF
THE 'JUDGMENTS PROJECT' 235 C. THE HAGUE CONVENTION 2005 ON CHOICE OF
COURT AGREEMENTS 235 III. OTHER INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS OF RELEVANCE
240 A. UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SAELE
OFGOODS 1980 241 B. NEW YORK CONVENTION 1958 242 C. CHARTER OF THE
UNITED NATIONS 242 D. INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL
RIGHTS (ICCPR) 249 1. ALPERT'S ICCPR CHALLENGE TO AUSTRALIAN
JURISDICTION 250 2. EXHAUSTION 251 3. JURISDICTION 252 4. SUBSTANTIVE
DISPUTE 253 5. CONCLUDING REMARKS 254 CHAPTER9 A CRITIQUE OF CURRENT
RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 257 I. RULES OF JURISDICTION 258 A.
UNINTERESTING AND UNCONTROVERSIAL JURISDICTIONAL GROUNDS 258 B.
UNINTERESTING BUT CONTROVERSIAL JURISDICTIONAL GROUNDS 259 C. US
DOCTRINE OF GENERAL JURISDICTION 260 D. SUBMISSION 260 1. SUBMISSION
AFTER THE DISPUTE ARISES 261 2. CONTRACT NOMINATING FORUM (SUBMISSION
BEFORE THE DISPUTE ARISES) 261 3. THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF
COURT AGREEMENTS 262 X TABLE OF CONTENTS E. THE LOCATION OF CONTRACT
FORMATION 265 F. THE APPLICABLE LAW BEING THE LAW OF THE FORUM 267 G.
THE LOCATION OF CONTRACT PERFORMANCE 267 H. CONTRACT BREACHED WITHIN THE
FORUM 268 I. LOCATION OF OBJECT OF LITIGATION 268 J. US CONTRACTUAL
SPECIFIC JURISDICTION 269 K. THE PLACE OF THE WRONGFUL ACT AND THE PLACE
OF HARM 269 1. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP ONE 271 2. JURISDICTION
EXERCISED OVER STEP TWO 272 3. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP THREE
274 4. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP FOUR 280 5. EXTENT OF
PLAINTIFF'S REPUTATION 281 6. ENFORCEMENT DIFFICULTIES 282 7. PRIOR
NOTICE (FORESEEABILITY) 284 8. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP FIVE 288
9. JURISDICTION EXERCISED OVER STEP SIX 289 10. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
IN RELATION TO JURISDICTION BASED ON PLACE OF WRONG/PLACE OF HARM 290 L.
PLAINTIFF'S HABITUAL RESIDENCE OR DOMICILE 291 M. THE LOCATION OF THE
SERVER 291 N. US EFFECTS TEST 292 O. PLAINTIFF'S LOCATION WHEN OBSERVING
THE INFRINGEMENT 292 P. INJUNCTIONS 292 Q. DETAINABLE PROPERTY WITHIN
THE FORUM STATE 293 R. REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE/BRANCH 294 II. RULES OF
DECLINING JURISDICTION 294 A. FORUM NON CONVENIENS 295 1. HOW CAN JUDGES
TAKE AWAY WHAT THE LAWMAKERS HAVE GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF? 296 2. TOO
MUCH DISCRETION 296 3. LACK OF UNIFORMITY 299 4. DELAYS THE PROCESS 299
5. 'CASE-SHOPPING' USED TO EASE THE COURTS' WORKLOAD 300 6.
'CASE-SHOPPING' USED TO PROTECT DOMESTIC INTERESTS 300 7. DISCRETION TO
UPHOLD CHOICE OF FORUM CLAUSES NOMINATING A FOREIGN FORUM 301 8.
CONDITIONAL EXERCISE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS 302 9. FORUM NON
CONVENIENS: CLEARLY INAPPROPRIATE FOR INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS 304 10.
FORUM NON CONVENIENS: SUPERFLUOUS IF JURISDICTIONAL RULES ARE REASONABLE
304 11. THE DOCTRINE IS EASILY CIRCUMVENTED 305 12. THE DOCTRINE HAS
LOST ITS MEANING IN MODERN SOCIETY 305 13. CONCLUSIONS REGARDING THE
DOCTRINE OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS 306 TABLE OF CONTENTS XI B. LIS ALIBI
PENDENS 307 C. INEFFECTIVENESS 307 III. RULES OF CHOICEOFLAW 308 A.
CONTRACT DESIGNATED LAW 308 B. CLOSEST CONNECTION 308 C.
LAWOFBUYER'SDOMICILE 309 D. LEXFORI 310 E. LEX LOCI DELICTI (COMMISSI)
310 F. THE 'DOUBLE ACTIONABILITY' TEST AND ITS FLEXIBLE EXCEPTION 311 G
THE LAW OF THE PARTIES' COMMON HABITUAL RESIDENCE 312 IV. RULES OF
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 312 A. NO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 312 B.
CONVENTION-BASED RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 313 C. RECIPROCITY 313 D.
RESTRICTED RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 314 V. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
315 CHAPTERLO GEO-IDENTIFICATION: TECHNOLOGY TO THE RESCUE? 319 I.
INTERNET ARCHITECTURE, REGULATION AND'BORDERS' 319 II. GEO-LOCATION
TECHNOLOGIES 321 A. SOPHISTICATED GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES 322 1.
ACCURACY 324 2. FALSE POSITIVES AND/OR FALSE NEGATIVES 329 3. THE FUTURE
OF SOPHISTICATED GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES 331 B. UNSOPHISTICATED
GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES 334 C. GEO-LOCATION TECHNOLOGIES IN PRACTICE
335 III. 'SOFT PROTECTION': NON-TECHNICAL MEANS OF GEOGRAPHICAL
IDENTIFICATION 338 A. DISCLAIMERS 340 B. 'CLICK-WRAP'AGREEMENTS 341 C.
MENUES: THE BETTER AND WORST ALTERNATIVE 342 D. DELIVERY ADDRESS 343 1.
DIGITIZED PRODUCTS 344 E. OFFLINE IDENTIFICATION 345 F. 'SOFT
PROTECTION' IN PRACTICE 345 IV. GEO-IDENTIFICATION: AQUESTION
OFATTITUDES 347 V. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS 351 XII TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTERLL PROPOSED 'DEFAMATION CONVENTION MODEL' 353 I. STRUCTURE OF THE
MODELS 354 II. INTRODUCTION TO THE 'DEFAMATION MODEL' 354 III. BASIC
FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED MODEL 355 IV. ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE 357 V. PUTTING
THE 'DEFAMATION MODEL' TO THE TEST 375 CHAPTERL2 PROPOSED 'CONTRACTS
CONVENTION MODEL' 379 I. BASIC FEATURES OF THE PROPOSED MODEL 379 II.
ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE 380 III. PUTTING THE 'CONTRACTS MODEL' TO THE TEST
396 CHAPTERL3 CONCLUDING REMARKS 399 SELECTEDBIBLIOGRAPHY 403 TABLE
OFAUTHORITIES 415 INDEX 427 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. |
author_GND | (DE-588)114487730X |
author_facet | Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. |
author_variant | d j b s djb djbs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV022245154 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | K7625 |
callnumber-raw | K7625 |
callnumber-search | K7625 |
callnumber-sort | K 47625 |
callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
classification_rvk | PT 319 PZ 3200 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255976909 (DE-599)BVBBV022245154 |
dewey-full | 343.09944 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 343 - Military, tax, trade & industrial law |
dewey-raw | 343.09944 |
dewey-search | 343.09944 |
dewey-sort | 3343.09944 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01949nam a2200493 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV022245154</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180419 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070129s2007 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9041125167</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-2516-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789041125163</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-411-2516-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255976909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV022245154</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K7625</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">343.09944</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 319</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139857:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PZ 3200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141165:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)114487730X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Private international law and the Internet</subfield><subfield code="c">Dan Jerker B. Svantesson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Alphen an den Rijn</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law Internat.</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXI, 440 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Jurisdiction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4308416-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Privatrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027446-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4308416-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Internationales Privatrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027446-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015456026&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015456026</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV022245154 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T16:37:26Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:53:14Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9041125167 9789041125163 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-015456026 |
oclc_num | 255976909 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-M382 DE-29 DE-384 DE-739 DE-703 DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-29 DE-384 DE-739 DE-703 DE-188 |
physical | XXI, 440 S. |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | Kluwer Law Internat. |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. Verfasser (DE-588)114487730X aut Private international law and the Internet Dan Jerker B. Svantesson Alphen an den Rijn Kluwer Law Internat. 2007 XXI, 440 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Recht Conflict of laws Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Internet Law and legislation Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd rswk-swf Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf 1\p (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 s Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015456026&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
spellingShingle | Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. Private international law and the Internet Recht Conflict of laws Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Internet Law and legislation Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4308416-3 (DE-588)4027446-9 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | Private international law and the Internet |
title_auth | Private international law and the Internet |
title_exact_search | Private international law and the Internet |
title_exact_search_txtP | Private international law and the Internet |
title_full | Private international law and the Internet Dan Jerker B. Svantesson |
title_fullStr | Private international law and the Internet Dan Jerker B. Svantesson |
title_full_unstemmed | Private international law and the Internet Dan Jerker B. Svantesson |
title_short | Private international law and the Internet |
title_sort | private international law and the internet |
topic | Recht Conflict of laws Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Internet Law and legislation Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd Internationales Privatrecht (DE-588)4027446-9 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Recht Conflict of laws Conflict of laws Jurisdiction Internet Law and legislation Internet Internationales Privatrecht Rechtsvergleich Hochschulschrift |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=015456026&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT svantessondanjerkerb privateinternationallawandtheinternet |