Jurisdiction and the internet: a study of regulatory competence over online activity
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge [u.a.]
Cambridge Univ. Press
2007
|
Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XXII, 323 S. |
ISBN: | 0521843804 9780521843805 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV021673687 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20170626 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 060727s2007 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0521843804 |9 0-521-84380-4 | ||
020 | |a 9780521843805 |9 978-0-521-84380-5 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)254656648 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021673687 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-355 |a DE-M382 |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-29 | ||
050 | 0 | |a K564.C6 | |
082 | 0 | |a 343.9944 | |
084 | |a PZ 3250 |0 (DE-625)141166: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 2 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kohl, Uta |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1028165021 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Jurisdiction and the internet |b a study of regulatory competence over online activity |c Uta Kohl |
250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge [u.a.] |b Cambridge Univ. Press |c 2007 | |
300 | |a XXII, 323 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
650 | 4 | |a Politik | |
650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
650 | 4 | |a Cyberspace |x Government policy | |
650 | 4 | |a Electronic commerce |x Law and legislation | |
650 | 4 | |a Internet |x Law and legislation | |
650 | 4 | |a Jurisdiction | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internet |0 (DE-588)4308416-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Internet |0 (DE-588)4308416-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014888012&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014888012 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804135491067445248 |
---|---|
adam_text | CONTENTS
Preface
and acknowledgments page
ix
Table of cases
xi
Table of statutes, regulations, directives and treaties
xviii
1
Jurisdiction and the Internet
1
1.
The global net versus national laws
1
A. A story about eggs
1
B. Mapping the legal landscape
3
С
Who cares?
6
D. A conservative approach
11
2.
The building blocks
13
A. Jurisdiction
13
B. Public law versus private law
19
С
The quest for the perfect link
20
3.
Actual and possible solutions foreshadowed
24
A. Territoriality: country-of-origin and
country-of-destination
24
B. The Achilles Heel: limited enforcement jurisdiction
26
C. More global law or a less global internet: a simple choice
28
D. Code: a separate option?
30
2
Law: too lethargic for the online era?
33
L
National trademarks versus international domain names
33
2.
The Internet s impact on law and regulation
35
A. The qualitatively new legal problems
35
B. The quantitatively new legal problems
37
С
The severity of the problems
39
3.
Legal reasoning and legal change
41
A. Legal reasoning
41
B. Judicial reasoning: continuity and change
43
C. Legislative justification: change and continuity
45
4.
The jurisdictional challenge
47
A. Isa
website enough? Two schools of thought
47
VÍ
CONTENTS
В.
Conservatism: a mere result of the judiciary s limitations?
52
С
The best solution versus the least disruptive solution
56
5.
Law as an engine of, or brake on, change
58
A. The floodgates argument
59
B. The futility argument
62
C. The cautious way forward
64
3
The tipping point in law
66
1.
Contract law. unaffected by online transnationality?
66
2.
The tipping point
69
A. Evolution of law versus the tipping point
69
B. Substantive justice versus formal justice
71
3.
The evolution of jurisdictional rules in private cases
74
A. Adjudicative jurisdiction in consumer contracts: no gain
without pain
74
B. Pre-Internet refinements
79
C. Internet refinements
82
4.
The evolution of jurisdictional rules in public cases
87
A. Criminal jurisdiction
87
B. Pre-Internet refinements
89
The objective territoriality principle
89
The reasonable effects doctrine
91
Return to a crude effects doctrine
94
C. Internet developments
96
D. The common denominators
102
The possibility of concurrent jurisdiction
102
Insistence on enforcement jurisdiction
104
Lack of international consensus: moral and cultural values
107
5.
The better path?
108
4
Many destinations but no map 111
1.
Notice of foreign legal obligations 111
2.
Foreseeability of foreign defamation law
115
A. Foreseeability and the rule of law
115
B. Absence of noticeable borders in cyberspace
117
C. Actual access, even if minuscule
119
D. Foreseeability of foreign law in respect of freely
accessible sites
125
Foreseeability of all destinations
127
Foreseeability of foreign harm
129
Foreseeability of specifically targeted destinations
134
E. Two destination principles: their flaws and merits
138
CONTENTS
Vil
3. Foreseeability
of foreign criminal law
141
A. Common rules but multiple interpretations
141
B. Foreseeability and the territoriality principle
143
С
Foreseeability of all destinations
145
D. Reasonable foreseeability : some conclusions
149
4.
Actually foreseeing and knowing foreign law
153
A. Actual notice and the effectiveness of law
153
B. Traditional methods of publication of law
157
C. The failure of traditional methods in the online world
159
5.
An afterthought
163
5
The solution: only the country of origin?
164
1.
The exclusive country-of-origin approach
164
2.
Online gambling: foreign providers local activities
167
A. The general rejection of the exclusive country-of-origin
approach
167
Netherlands and Germany
167
European Union
168
United States
169
WTO and GATS
171
Australia
173
New Zealand
174
B. The exclusive country-of-origin approach and its flaws
175
The UK Gambling Act
2005 175
Loss of economic rewards
176
Forum-shopping and the race to the bottom
178
Shift of regulatory burden
181
No protection from harmful foreign content
182
Lowest common denominator
184
The special case of the Electronic Commerce Directive
184
3.
Online gambling: local providers foreign activities
190
A. Lack of cooperation in non-harmonised public law
190
B. The UK and Australia: good neighbours
193
4.
An example to follow?
197
6
The lack of enforcement power: a curse or a blessing?
199
1.
Limited enforcement power: a blessing in disguise
199
2.
Enforceability and legal compliance
203
A. Enforceability, not enforcement, matters
203
B. Voluntary compliance without the threat of enforcement
206
C. Enforceability and why it really matters
207
3.
Upholding local law despite foreign violations
210
Vlil
CONTENTS
A. Cooperation in private law
210
Cooperation and regulatory restraint
212
Two interpretations of the public policy exception
214
B. No cooperation in public law
218
The public law taboo
218
Lack of power or lack of will?
221
С
Unilateral enforcement strategies
225
Symbolic prosecution without enforcement
225
Imposition of penalty on related local persons
226
Analogous prohibitions imposed on local intermediaries
and end-users
227
Prohibition of supportive services by local actors
228
Blocking of foreign illegal content
229
4.
The public-private law dichotomy and its lessons
for cooperation
230
A. Public and private international law
231
B. The public-private law spectrum
233
С
Underlying concern: foreign State interest and involvement
238
Public versus private complainants
240
Public versus private cause of action
242
Public versus private remedy
245
The paradox
248
5.
The future of cooperation
251
7
A simple choice: more global law or a less
global Internet
253
1.
The hidden choice
253
2.
More global law
258
A. Harmonisation
of competence rules?
259
B. Substantive
harmonisation
by design
262
Harmonisation
through treaty
263
Harmonisation
through deregulation
265
C. Substantive
harmonisation
by default
270
The country-of-destination approach
271
The country-of-origin approach
275
3.
A less transnational Internet
278
A. Zoning in the country of origin
278
B. Zoning in the country of destination
283
4.
Making the choice: a value judgment
287
Bibliography
291
Index
312
|
adam_txt |
CONTENTS
Preface
and acknowledgments page
ix
Table of cases
xi
Table of statutes, regulations, directives and treaties
xviii
1
Jurisdiction and the Internet
1
1.
The global net versus national laws
1
A. A story about eggs
1
B. Mapping the legal landscape
3
С
Who cares?
6
D. A conservative approach
11
2.
The building blocks
13
A. Jurisdiction
13
B. Public law versus private law
19
С
The quest for the perfect link
20
3.
Actual and possible solutions foreshadowed
24
A. Territoriality: country-of-origin and
country-of-destination
24
B. The Achilles' Heel: limited enforcement jurisdiction
26
C. More global law or a less global internet: a simple choice
28
D. Code: a separate option?
30
2
Law: too lethargic for the online era?
33
L
National trademarks versus international domain names
33
2.
The Internet's impact on law and regulation
35
A. The qualitatively new legal problems
35
B. The quantitatively new legal problems
37
С
The severity of the problems
39
3.
Legal reasoning and legal change
41
A. Legal reasoning
41
B. Judicial reasoning: continuity and change
43
C. Legislative justification: change and continuity
45
4.
The jurisdictional challenge
47
A. Isa
website enough? Two schools of thought
47
VÍ
CONTENTS
В.
Conservatism: a mere result of the judiciary's limitations?
52
С
The best solution versus the least disruptive solution
56
5.
Law as an engine of, or brake on, change
58
A. The floodgates argument
59
B. The futility argument
62
C. The cautious way forward
64
3
The tipping point in law
66
1.
Contract law. unaffected by online transnationality?
66
2.
The tipping point
69
A. Evolution of law versus the tipping point
69
B. Substantive justice versus formal justice
71
3.
The evolution of jurisdictional rules in private cases
74
A. Adjudicative jurisdiction in consumer contracts: no gain
without pain
74
B. Pre-Internet refinements
79
C. Internet refinements
82
4.
The evolution of jurisdictional rules in public cases
87
A. Criminal jurisdiction
87
B. Pre-Internet refinements
89
The objective territoriality principle
89
The 'reasonable' effects doctrine
91
Return to a 'crude' effects doctrine
94
C. Internet developments
96
D. The common denominators
102
The possibility of concurrent jurisdiction
102
Insistence on enforcement jurisdiction
104
Lack of international consensus: moral and cultural values
107
5.
The better path?
108
4
Many destinations but no map 111
1.
Notice of foreign legal obligations 111
2.
Foreseeability of foreign defamation law
115
A. Foreseeability and the rule of law
115
B. Absence of noticeable borders in cyberspace
117
C. Actual access, even if minuscule
119
D. Foreseeability of foreign law in respect of freely
accessible sites
125
Foreseeability of all destinations
127
Foreseeability of foreign harm
129
Foreseeability of specifically targeted destinations
134
E. Two destination principles: their flaws and merits
138
CONTENTS
Vil
3. Foreseeability
of foreign criminal law
141
A. Common rules but multiple interpretations
141
B. Foreseeability and the territoriality principle
143
С
Foreseeability of all destinations
145
D. 'Reasonable foreseeability': some conclusions
149
4.
Actually foreseeing and knowing foreign law
153
A. Actual notice and the effectiveness of law
153
B. Traditional methods of publication of law
157
C. The failure of traditional methods in the online world
159
5.
An afterthought
163
5
The solution: only the country of origin?
164
1.
The exclusive country-of-origin approach
164
2.
Online gambling: foreign providers' local activities
167
A. The general rejection of the exclusive country-of-origin
approach
167
Netherlands and Germany
167
European Union
168
United States
169
WTO and GATS
171
Australia
173
New Zealand
174
B. The exclusive country-of-origin approach and its flaws
175
The UK Gambling Act
2005 175
Loss of economic rewards
176
Forum-shopping and the race to the bottom
178
Shift of regulatory burden
181
No protection from harmful foreign content
182
Lowest common denominator
184
The special case of the Electronic Commerce Directive
184
3.
Online gambling: local providers'foreign activities
190
A. Lack of cooperation in non-harmonised public law
190
B. The UK and Australia: good neighbours
193
4.
An example to follow?
197
6
The lack of enforcement power: a curse or a blessing?
199
1.
Limited enforcement power: a blessing in disguise
199
2.
Enforceability and legal compliance
203
A. Enforceability, not enforcement, matters
203
B. 'Voluntary'compliance without the threat of enforcement
206
C. Enforceability and why it really matters
207
3.
Upholding local law despite foreign violations
210
Vlil
CONTENTS
A. Cooperation in private law
210
Cooperation and regulatory restraint
212
Two interpretations of the 'public policy' exception
214
B. No cooperation in public law
218
The 'public law' taboo
218
Lack of power or lack of will?
221
С
Unilateral enforcement strategies
225
Symbolic prosecution without enforcement
225
Imposition of penalty on related local persons
226
Analogous prohibitions imposed on local intermediaries
and end-users
227
Prohibition of supportive services by local actors
228
Blocking of foreign illegal content
229
4.
The public-private law dichotomy and its lessons
for cooperation
230
A. 'Public' and 'private' international law
231
B. The public-private law spectrum
233
С
Underlying concern: foreign State interest and involvement
238
Public versus private complainants
240
Public versus private cause of action
242
Public versus private remedy
245
The paradox
248
5.
The future of cooperation
251
7
A 'simple' choice: more global law or a less
global Internet
253
1.
The hidden choice
253
2.
More global law
258
A. Harmonisation
of competence rules?
259
B. Substantive
harmonisation
by design
262
Harmonisation
through treaty
263
Harmonisation
through deregulation
265
C. Substantive
harmonisation
by default
270
The country-of-destination approach
271
The country-of-origin approach
275
3.
A less transnational Internet
278
A. Zoning in the country of origin
278
B. Zoning in the country of destination
283
4.
Making the choice: a value judgment
287
Bibliography
291
Index
312 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Kohl, Uta |
author_GND | (DE-588)1028165021 |
author_facet | Kohl, Uta |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Kohl, Uta |
author_variant | u k uk |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV021673687 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | K564 |
callnumber-raw | K564.C6 |
callnumber-search | K564.C6 |
callnumber-sort | K 3564 C6 |
callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
classification_rvk | PZ 3250 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)254656648 (DE-599)BVBBV021673687 |
dewey-full | 343.9944 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 343 - Military, tax, trade & industrial law |
dewey-raw | 343.9944 |
dewey-search | 343.9944 |
dewey-sort | 3343.9944 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
edition | 1. publ. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01723nam a2200469 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021673687</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170626 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">060727s2007 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0521843804</subfield><subfield code="9">0-521-84380-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780521843805</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-521-84380-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)254656648</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021673687</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K564.C6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">343.9944</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PZ 3250</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141166:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kohl, Uta</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1028165021</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction and the internet</subfield><subfield code="b">a study of regulatory competence over online activity</subfield><subfield code="c">Uta Kohl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXII, 323 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cyberspace</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electronic commerce</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4308416-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Internet</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4308416-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014888012&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014888012</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV021673687 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T15:09:31Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:41:21Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0521843804 9780521843805 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014888012 |
oclc_num | 254656648 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-M382 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-29 |
owner_facet | DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-M382 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-29 |
physical | XXII, 323 S. |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | Cambridge Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Kohl, Uta Verfasser (DE-588)1028165021 aut Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity Uta Kohl 1. publ. Cambridge [u.a.] Cambridge Univ. Press 2007 XXII, 323 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Politik Recht Cyberspace Government policy Electronic commerce Law and legislation Internet Law and legislation Jurisdiction Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 s DE-604 Digitalisierung UB Regensburg application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014888012&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Kohl, Uta Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity Politik Recht Cyberspace Government policy Electronic commerce Law and legislation Internet Law and legislation Jurisdiction Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4308416-3 (DE-588)4115710-2 |
title | Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity |
title_auth | Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity |
title_exact_search | Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity |
title_exact_search_txtP | Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity |
title_full | Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity Uta Kohl |
title_fullStr | Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity Uta Kohl |
title_full_unstemmed | Jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity Uta Kohl |
title_short | Jurisdiction and the internet |
title_sort | jurisdiction and the internet a study of regulatory competence over online activity |
title_sub | a study of regulatory competence over online activity |
topic | Politik Recht Cyberspace Government policy Electronic commerce Law and legislation Internet Law and legislation Jurisdiction Internet (DE-588)4308416-3 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Politik Recht Cyberspace Government policy Electronic commerce Law and legislation Internet Law and legislation Jurisdiction Internet Rechtsprechung |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014888012&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kohluta jurisdictionandtheinternetastudyofregulatorycompetenceoveronlineactivity |