Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
The Hague
Kluwer Law International
2006
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXIV, 365 S. |
| ISBN: | 9041123520 904112358X |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV021551398 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20190708 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 060418s2006 ne |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9041123520 |9 90-411-2352-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 904112358X |9 90-411-2358-X | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)64450625 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021551398 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a ne |c XA-NL | ||
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-20 |a DE-521 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 |a DE-384 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJE6536 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 343.40721 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PS 3360 |0 (DE-625)139766: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PT 350 |0 (DE-625)139874: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PZ 3300 |0 (DE-625)141167: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Landolt, Phillip |d 1967- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1188469975 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration |c Phillip Landolt |
| 264 | 1 | |a The Hague |b Kluwer Law International |c 2006 | |
| 300 | |a XXIV, 365 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 7 | |a Europees recht |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Wettbewerbsrecht - Europäische Union |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationale arbitrage |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Mededingingsrecht |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Europäische Union |2 swd | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Europarecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration, International | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Competition, Unfair |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht |0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Europäische Union - Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |2 swd | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Wettbewerbsrecht |0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4162055-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014767468&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014767468 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820135375621849088 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
MODERNISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PHILLIP
LANDOLT, PH.D (CANTAB.) BARRISTER (ENGLAND & WALES) BARRISTER &
SOLICITOR (ONTARIO, CANADA) KLUWERLAW INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD XIII TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS XV TABLE OF EU CASE LAW XIX CHAPTER
1 - INTRODUCTION 1 I. COMPETITION LAW IN THE EU LEGAL ORDER 1 II.
ARBITRATION 2 III. WHYTHISBOOK? 3 IV. SCOPE OF THIS BOOK 7 V. A NOTE ON
TERMINOLOGY 9 VI. TOPOGRAPHY OF EC COMPETITION LAW 11 CHAPTER 2 - THE
OBJECTIVES OF COMPETITION LAW 19 I. THE HALLMARKS OF MODERN COMPETITION
LAW 19 II. EC COMPETITION LAW AS A SYSTEM OF MODERN COMPETITION LAW 22
A. GENERAL 22 B. THE PRIMARILY PUBLIC NARURE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF EC
COMPETITION 22 LAW C. THE DUAL OBJECTIVES OFEC COMPETITION LAW 25
CHAPTER 3 - THE ENFORCEMENT OF COMMUNITY LAW 33 I. RELATIONS BETWEEN
COMMUNITY LAW AND MEMBER STATE LAW 33 A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES 33 B. DIRECT
EFFECT UNDER THE EC TREATY 34 C. THE SYSTEM OF ENFORCEMENT OF PRIVATE
RIGHTS UNDER COMMUNITY 34 LAW D. COMPETITION LAW WITHIN THE COMMUNITY
LEGAL ORDER 35 1. GENERAL 35 2. DIRECT APPLICABILITY OF EC COMPETITION
LAW 36 II. MODERNISATION 38 A. BACKGROUND 38 B. MODERNISATION AND
ARBITRATION 39 CHAPTER 4 - THE CONTENT OF EC COMPETITON LAW 43 I. THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 81 EC AND ARTICLES 82 EC 43 VI MODERNISED
EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION II. ARTICLE 81 EC 44 A.
THE TEXT 44 B. ANALYSIS UNDER ARTICLE 81 EC- GENERAL 45 C. OBJECTS AND
EFFECTS 45 D. DE MINIMIS NOTICE 48 E. EFFECTS 49 F. ANALYSING EFFECTS 52
G. ARTICLE 81(3) EC - EFFICIENCIES 53 H. BLOCK EXEMPTIONS AND RELATED
NOTICES 56 1. GENERAL 56 2. THE TWO HORIZONTAL COOPERATION BLOCK
EXEMPTIONS 57 3. THE R & D BLOCK EXEMPTION 58 4. THE SPECIALISATION
BLOCK EXEMPTION 60 5. THE HORIZONTAL COOPERATION GUIDELINES 61 6. THE
VERTICAL RESTRAINTS BLOCK EXEMPTION 66 7. THE VERTICALS GUIDELINES 67 8.
THE SUBCONTRACTING NOTICE 68 9. THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER BLOCK EXEMPTION
69 10. THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER GUIDELINES 72 III. ARTICLE 82 EC 74 A.
GENERAL 74 B. DOMINANCE 75 C. JOINT DOMINANCE 76 D. SIGNIFICANCEOF
OCCUPYINGA DOMINANT POSITION 77 E. ABUSE OF A DOMINANT POSITION 77 IV.
MEMBER STATE GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED DISTORTIONS TO COMPETITION 82 V. EC
COMPETITION LAW AND SECTORAL REGULATION 85 CHAPTER 5 - ARBITRABILITY 89
I. POWERS OF AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL TODECIDE MATERIAL ISSUES 89 II.
APPLICABLE LAW 90 III. ARBITRABILITY UNDER SURVEYED STATES' LAW 92 IV.
COMPETITION LAW 93 A. FEATURES OF COMPETITION LAW RELEVANT TO THE
ARBITRABILITY 93 DETERMINATION B. THE ARBITRABILITY OF COMPETITION LAW
UNDER SURVEYED STATES' LAW 94 C. COMPARISON WITH ARBITRABILITY OF
COMPETITION LAW UNDER US 95 FEDERAL LAW D. EU LAW 99 1.
PRE-MODERNISATION 99 2. MODERNISATION 101 CHAPTER 6 - THE APPLICATION OF
MANDATORY NORMS 105 I. OVERVIEW 105 A. FOUR QUESTIONS 105 B. THE
RESPONSES IN BRIEF 105 TABLE OF CONTENTS VII 1. ANTINOMY BETWEEN
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND ASSURING THE 105 APPLICATION OF MANDATORY
NORMS 2. DUTIES UPON ARBITRATORS 107 3. SOME CONCLUSIONS 108 A.
ARBITRATORS WILL PROPERLY APPLY MANDATORY NORMS IN 108 ACCORDANCE WITH
THEIR JUSTIFIED CLAIMS B. AUTHORITY FOR APPLYING MANDATORY NORMS IN
ARBITRATIONS 109 C. PROPER ROLE OF PARTY WILL IN THE APPLICATION OF
MANDATORY 111 NORMS II. MANDATORY NORMS IN THE CONFLICTSOF LAW SYSTEM
112 A. GENERAL 112 1. RULES OF MANDATORY APPLICATION 112 2. APPLICABLE
LAW IN THE ABSENCES OF STATES' INTERESTS 113 3. CHOICE OF LAW IN THE
PRESENCE OF STATES' INTERESTS 113 4. TYPES OF MANDATORY NORMS 114 5.
MANDATORY NORMS AND PUBLIC POLICY 115 6. THE SPECIFIC PROBLEM OF
APPLYING MANDATORY RULES IN 117 ARBITRATIONS B. THE APPLICATION OF
MANDATORY NORMS BY COURTS 118 1. NORMS OF THE FORUM 118 2. NORMS OTHER
THAN THOSE OF THE FORUM 118 3. COMPETING APPLICATION OF TWO STATES'
MANDATORY NORMS 119 4. THE ROME CONVENTION ON THE LAW APPLICABLE TO
CONTRACTUAL 120 MATTERS A. SCOPE OF APPLICATION 120 B. TREATMENT OF
MANDATORY NORMS UNDER THE ROME 120 CONVENTION C. FOREIGN MANDATORY NORMS
UNDER THE ROME CONVENTION 120 D. DOMESTIC MANDATORY NORMS UNDER THE ROME
CONVENTION 123 E. ROME CONVENTION TREATMENT OF FOREIGN MANDATORY 124
NORMS REFLECTS WIDELY ACCEPTED PRINCIPLES F. FURTHER AUTHORITY
SUPPORTING TREATMENT OF MANDATORY 127 NORMS UNDER THE ROME CONVENTION
MODEL C. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COURTS AND ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS IN RELATION
TO 128 MANDATORY NORMS D. APPLICATION OF MANDATORY NORMS IN ARBITRATION
PRACTICE AND 129 THEORY 1. ARBITRATION PRACTICE 129 2. LEGAL LITERATURE
134 E. PROPER APPROACH TO THE APPLICATION OF EC COMPETITION LAW BY 139
ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS 1. ENFORCEABLE AND UNENFORCEABLE DUTY UPON
ARBITRATORS 139 2. ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATIONS UPON ARBITRATORS 141 A.
ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATIONS ARE ONLY EVER "ENFORCEABLE" ON 141 ARBITRATORS
IN AN INDIRECT SENSE B. PROVISIONS ON APPLICABLE LAW IN ARBITRATION LAWS
141 VIII MODERNISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION C.
IS THERE ANY ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATION UNDER ARBITRATION 142 LAWS TO
DETERMINE THE APPLICABLE LAW IN A CERTAIN MANNER? D. UNSYSTEMATIC AND
VIRTUALLY ADVENTITIOUS NATURE OF 144 JUDICIAL JURISDICTION TO INTERFERE
WITH ARBITRATION AWARDS 3. ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATIONS ON ARBITRATORS AND
THE APPLICATION OF 145 EC COMPETITION LAW A. COURTS OF EU MEMBER STATES
145 B. COURTS OF STATES NOT BELONGING TO THE EU 148 C. COMPETITION
AUTHORITIES 152 4. UNENFORCEABLE DUTY ON ARBITRATORS 154 5. APPLYING
MANDATORY NORMS IN ARBITRATION 156 III. MUST ARBITRATORS RAISE MANDATORY
NORMS OF THEIR OWN MOTION? 158 A. GENERAL 158 B. PRACTICAL LIMITS ON
ARBITRATORS' OBLIGATION TO APPLY MANDATORY 159 NORMS OF THEIR OWN MOTION
CHAPTER 7 - TAKING EC COMPETITION LAW SERIOUSLY 161 I. COMPETITION LAW
AS MANDATORY NORMS 161 A. STATES'INTERESTS 161 B. THE TERRITORIALITY
PRINCIPLE AND COMPETITION LAW 163 1. EFFECTS ON MARKETS 163 2.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE POSITION UNDER US LAW 164 II. THE APPLICATION OF EC
COMPETITION LAW 169 A. OUTER LIMITS OF THE APPLICATION OFEC COMPETITION
LAW 169 1. QUALIFIED EFFECTS 169 2. RESPECTIVE APPLICATION OF EC AND
MEMBER STATE COMPETITION 172 LAWS A. EFFECT ON TRADE BETWEEN THE EU
MEMBER STATES 172 B. THE EFFECT ON TRADE GUIDELINES 179 C. SUBSIDIARITY
183 D. PROPORTIONALITY 183 B. COMPLICATIONS UNDER EU LAW IN DISCERNING
WHICH OF ITS NORMS ARE 184 MANDATORY C. THE EU'S POLICY ON APPLICATION
OF EC COMPETITION LAW 186 D. LIMITS TO APPLICATION OF EC COMPETITION LAW
INHERING WITHIN THE 189 EU LEGAL ORDER ITSELF 1. MATERIAL EXTENT OF
APPLICATION OF EC COMPETITION LAW 189 2. LIMITS DUE TO PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE LEX FORI 192 A. GENERAL 192 B. VAN SCHIJNDEL 192 C.
PETERBROECK 194 D. ECO SWISS 194 E. CONCLUSIONS ON THESE THREE
PRELIMINARY REFERENCE 197 DECISIONS OF THE ECJ TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 3.
COMPETITION BETWEEN AN EU LAW RULE AND A SUBSTANTIVE 207 MEMBER STATE
RULE 4. THE ORIGIN OF THE EU NORM WITHIN THE COMMUNITY LEGAL 209 ORDER
5. APPLICATION OFHARDCORE PROHIBITION MORE COMPELLING 215 6. DISTINCTION
AS TO PARTICULAR OBJECTIVES OF EC COMPETITION LAW 217 7. DISTINCTION IN
RELATION TO EFFECTS OF EC COMPETITION LAW 217 8. DISTINCTION BETWEEN
HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL RESTRAINTS 220 9. THE IMPERATIVITY OF MARKET
DEFINITION UNDER EC COMPETITION 220 LAW III. THE IMPERATIVITY ASSESSMENT
BY ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS 221 A. GENERAL 221 B. LIMITATIONS EXTENDING FROM
THE ARBITRATION CONTEXT 221 C. ASSESSMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE IMPORTANCEOF
COMPETITION LAW 221 D. COMPETING PUBLIC POLICY CLAIMS OF TWO OR MORE
STATES 227 IV. ARE ARBITRATORS UNDER AN OBLIGATION TO APPLY EC
COMPETITION LAW OF 229 THEIR OWN MOTION? V. THE SUPPLEMENTARY
APPLICATION OF THE LEX ARBITRII AND THE LEX CAUSAE 230 CHAPTER 8 - EC
COMPETITION LAW ASSISTANCE IN 237 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION I.
NON-MANDATORY STATEMENTS OFEC COMPETITION LAW 237 A. COMMISSION NOTICES
237 B. OTHER NON-BINDING STATEMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION 237 C. TREATMENT
OF NON-BINDING STATEMENTS OF EC COMPETITION LAW BY 240 ARBITRATORS II.
INFLUENCE ON ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF OTHER BODIES' PRIOR APPLICATIONS OF
240 LEGAL NORMS A. CRITICAL ROLE OF PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS IN
PRIVATE 240 COMPETITION LAW PROCEEDINGS B. BASES UPON WHICH ARBITRAL
TRIBUNALS MAY RELY ON PRIOR 241 DETERMINATIONS 1. DISTINCTION BETWEEN
MANDATORY NORMS AND APPLICATIONS OF 241 MANDATORY NORMS 2. TREATMENT OF
PRIOR DECISIONS BY ARBITRATORS 242 A. RES JUDICATA 242 B. VALUES OUTSIDE
OFTHOSE BEHIND RES JUDICATA 246 C. PARALLEL BETWEEN FOREIGN MANDATORY
NORMS AND FOREIGN 246 DECISIONS AND AWARDS 3. FACTORS AFFECTING DEGREE
OF ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS' RELIANCE ON 247 PRIOR DETERMINATIONS A. RIGHTS
OF DEFENCE 247 B. SIMILARITY OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE TWO
PROCEEDINGS 248 C. INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCE OF PRIOR DECISION-MAKER 248
D. THE COGENCY OF THE ANALYSIS 249 E. NATURE OF THE PRIOR DECISION 249 X
MODEMISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION III.
ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS' TREATMENT OF PRIOR DETERMINATIONS ON EC 249
COMPETITION LAW A. GENERAL 249 B. AUTHORITY OF EC COMPETITION LAW
DECISIONS UNDER MEMBER STATE 250 LAW C. AUTHORITY OF EC COMPETITION LAW
DECISIONS UNDER COMMUNITY 251 LAW 1. GENERAL 251 2. COMMUNITY COURTS 252
3. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 253 A. GENERAL 253 B. BASES FOR THE AUTHORITY
OF COMMISSION DECISIONS UNDER 253 COMMUNITY LAW C. APPLICATION TO
ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS 256 D. EXTENT OF AUTHORITY OF COMMISSION DECISIONS
UNDER 256 COMMUNITY LAW 4. MEMBER STATE COMPETITION AUTHORITIES 260 5.
MEMBER STATE COURTS 261 D. CONSIDERATIONS RELEVANT TO ARBITRATORS'
WEIGHTING OF PRIOR EC 261 COMPETITION LAW DETERMINATIONS 1. RIGHTS OF
THE DEFENCE 261 2. SIMILARITY OF ISSUES 262 3. INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCE
OF FIRST DECISION MAKER 265 4. THE NATURE OF THE DECISION 269 IV. EFFECT
ON ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS OF CONTEMPORANEOUS PROCEEDINGS BEFORE 274 OTHER
BODIES V. INTERVENTION OF COMMISSION AND MEMBER STATE COMPETITION
AUTHORITIES 278 IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS A. THE MODERNISATION
REGULATION 278 B. LEGAL NATURE OF THE COMMISSION'S INTERVENTION 280 C.
BASIS UPON WHICH THE COMMISSION MAY PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO 282
ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS D. COMMUNITY LAW LIMITS ON ASSISTANCE TO ARBITRAL
TRIBUNALS 282 E. CONFIDENTIALITY RESTRICTIONS UNDER ARBITRATION LAW 289
CHAPTER 9 - OVERVIEW OF SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE 295 I.
GATHERING EVIDENCE 295 A. GENERAL 295 B. SOURCES 296 1. AUTHORITATIVE OR
PERSUASIVE DETERMINATIONS FROM OTHER BODIES 296 2. ASSISTANCE FROM OTHER
DECISION MAKERS 296 3. SEARCHES 296 4. PRODUCTION ORDERS 297 5.
COMPELLING OF WITNESSES 298 6. MARKET KNOWLEDGE 298 7. ECONOMIC
CONSULTANTS 300 TABLE OF CONTENTS XI 8. TYPES OF ANALYSIS FREQUENTLY
CONDUCTED BY ECONOMIC 302 CONSULTANTS A. EMPIRICAL 302 B. ECONOMETRICS
303 9. ACCOUNTANTS 304 II. MARKET POWER - A FOUNDATIONAL CONCEPT 304
III. DETERMINATIONS 304 A. GENERAL 306 B. MARKET DEFINITION 307 1. THE
USES OF MARKET DEFINITION 307 2. THE COMMISSION'S TREATMENT OF MARKET
DEFINITION 308 3. OTHER COMMON TESTS USED IN RELATION TO MARKET
DEFINITION 311 C. MARKET SHARE 312 D. DRAWING CONCLUSIONS FROM MARKET
SHARES 312 E. REFINING MARKET POWER ANALYSIS 315 F. REVIEW OF ISSUES
RELATING TO ARTICLE 81 (3) EC 316 G. DOMINANCE 318 H. DISTORTIONS TO
COMPETITION 319 1. DEMONSTRATING EFFECTS ON COMPETITION 319 2.
QUANTIFYING DAMAGES 320 CHAPTER 10 - LEGAL RELIEF 323 I. PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OFEC COMPETITION LAW 323 II. BUERDEN OFPROOF 325 III.
STANDARD OFPROOF 326 IV. TIME BARRING 327 V. PROVISIONAL MEASURES 328 A.
GENERAL 328 B. APPLICABLE LAW 329 C. WHERE TO APPLY FOR INTERIM MEASURES
333 VI. SEVERANCE 335 A. GENERAL 335 B. SEVERANCE UNDER SURVEYED STATES'
LAW 336 1. GENERALLY 336 2. SEVERANCE UNDER SVVISS LAW 336 3. SEVERANCE
UNDER ENGLISH LAW 337 4. SEVERANCE UNDER FRENCH LAW 337 5. SEVERANCE
UNDER GERMAN LAW 338 6. SEVERANCE UNDER DUTCH LAW 338 VII. DAMAGES 338
A. GENERAL 338 B. COMPONENTS OF DAMAGES CLAIMS 342 1. GENERAL 342 2.
VIOLATION OFEC COMPETITION LAW 343 3. CAUSATION 344 4. DAMAGES 345 XII
MODERNISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION VIII. A. B.
C. D. E. F. 5. SWISS LAW 6. ENGLISH LAW 7. FRENCH LAW 8. GERMAN LAW 9.
DUTCH LAW RESTITUTION GENERAL SWISS LAW ENGLISH LAW FRENCH LAW GERMAN
LAW DUTCH LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY INDEX 346 346 347 348 349 350 350 350 351 352
352 352 353 363 |
| adam_txt |
MODERNISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PHILLIP
LANDOLT, PH.D (CANTAB.) BARRISTER (ENGLAND & WALES) BARRISTER &
SOLICITOR (ONTARIO, CANADA) KLUWERLAW INTERNATIONAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD XIII TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS XV TABLE OF EU CASE LAW XIX CHAPTER
1 - INTRODUCTION 1 I. COMPETITION LAW IN THE EU LEGAL ORDER 1 II.
ARBITRATION 2 III. WHYTHISBOOK? 3 IV. SCOPE OF THIS BOOK 7 V. A NOTE ON
TERMINOLOGY 9 VI. TOPOGRAPHY OF EC COMPETITION LAW 11 CHAPTER 2 - THE
OBJECTIVES OF COMPETITION LAW 19 I. THE HALLMARKS OF MODERN COMPETITION
LAW 19 II. EC COMPETITION LAW AS A SYSTEM OF MODERN COMPETITION LAW 22
A. GENERAL 22 B. THE PRIMARILY PUBLIC NARURE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF EC
COMPETITION 22 LAW C. THE DUAL OBJECTIVES OFEC COMPETITION LAW 25
CHAPTER 3 - THE ENFORCEMENT OF COMMUNITY LAW 33 I. RELATIONS BETWEEN
COMMUNITY LAW AND MEMBER STATE LAW 33 A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES 33 B. DIRECT
EFFECT UNDER THE EC TREATY 34 C. THE SYSTEM OF ENFORCEMENT OF PRIVATE
RIGHTS UNDER COMMUNITY 34 LAW D. COMPETITION LAW WITHIN THE COMMUNITY
LEGAL ORDER 35 1. GENERAL 35 2. DIRECT APPLICABILITY OF EC COMPETITION
LAW 36 II. MODERNISATION 38 A. BACKGROUND 38 B. MODERNISATION AND
ARBITRATION 39 CHAPTER 4 - THE CONTENT OF EC COMPETITON LAW 43 I. THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE 81 EC AND ARTICLES 82 EC 43 VI MODERNISED
EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION II. ARTICLE 81 EC 44 A.
THE TEXT 44 B. ANALYSIS UNDER ARTICLE 81 EC- GENERAL 45 C. OBJECTS AND
EFFECTS 45 D. DE MINIMIS NOTICE 48 E. EFFECTS 49 F. ANALYSING EFFECTS 52
G. ARTICLE 81(3) EC - EFFICIENCIES 53 H. BLOCK EXEMPTIONS AND RELATED
NOTICES 56 1. GENERAL 56 2. THE TWO HORIZONTAL COOPERATION BLOCK
EXEMPTIONS 57 3. THE R & D BLOCK EXEMPTION 58 4. THE SPECIALISATION
BLOCK EXEMPTION 60 5. THE HORIZONTAL COOPERATION GUIDELINES 61 6. THE
VERTICAL RESTRAINTS BLOCK EXEMPTION 66 7. THE VERTICALS GUIDELINES 67 8.
THE SUBCONTRACTING NOTICE 68 9. THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER BLOCK EXEMPTION
69 10. THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER GUIDELINES 72 III. ARTICLE 82 EC 74 A.
GENERAL 74 B. DOMINANCE 75 C. JOINT DOMINANCE 76 D. SIGNIFICANCEOF
OCCUPYINGA DOMINANT POSITION 77 E. ABUSE OF A DOMINANT POSITION 77 IV.
MEMBER STATE GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED DISTORTIONS TO COMPETITION 82 V. EC
COMPETITION LAW AND SECTORAL REGULATION 85 CHAPTER 5 - ARBITRABILITY 89
I. POWERS OF AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL TODECIDE MATERIAL ISSUES 89 II.
APPLICABLE LAW 90 III. ARBITRABILITY UNDER SURVEYED STATES' LAW 92 IV.
COMPETITION LAW 93 A. FEATURES OF COMPETITION LAW RELEVANT TO THE
ARBITRABILITY 93 DETERMINATION B. THE ARBITRABILITY OF COMPETITION LAW
UNDER SURVEYED STATES' LAW 94 C. COMPARISON WITH ARBITRABILITY OF
COMPETITION LAW UNDER US 95 FEDERAL LAW D. EU LAW 99 1.
PRE-MODERNISATION 99 2. MODERNISATION 101 CHAPTER 6 - THE APPLICATION OF
MANDATORY NORMS 105 I. OVERVIEW 105 A. FOUR QUESTIONS 105 B. THE
RESPONSES IN BRIEF 105 TABLE OF CONTENTS VII 1. ANTINOMY BETWEEN
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND ASSURING THE 105 APPLICATION OF MANDATORY
NORMS 2. DUTIES UPON ARBITRATORS 107 3. SOME CONCLUSIONS 108 A.
ARBITRATORS WILL PROPERLY APPLY MANDATORY NORMS IN 108 ACCORDANCE WITH
THEIR JUSTIFIED CLAIMS B. AUTHORITY FOR APPLYING MANDATORY NORMS IN
ARBITRATIONS 109 C. PROPER ROLE OF PARTY WILL IN THE APPLICATION OF
MANDATORY 111 NORMS II. MANDATORY NORMS IN THE CONFLICTSOF LAW SYSTEM
112 A. GENERAL 112 1. RULES OF MANDATORY APPLICATION 112 2. APPLICABLE
LAW IN THE ABSENCES OF STATES' INTERESTS 113 3. CHOICE OF LAW IN THE
PRESENCE OF STATES' INTERESTS 113 4. TYPES OF MANDATORY NORMS 114 5.
MANDATORY NORMS AND PUBLIC POLICY 115 6. THE SPECIFIC PROBLEM OF
APPLYING MANDATORY RULES IN 117 ARBITRATIONS B. THE APPLICATION OF
MANDATORY NORMS BY COURTS 118 1. NORMS OF THE FORUM 118 2. NORMS OTHER
THAN THOSE OF THE FORUM 118 3. COMPETING APPLICATION OF TWO STATES'
MANDATORY NORMS 119 4. THE ROME CONVENTION ON THE LAW APPLICABLE TO
CONTRACTUAL 120 MATTERS A. SCOPE OF APPLICATION 120 B. TREATMENT OF
MANDATORY NORMS UNDER THE ROME 120 CONVENTION C. FOREIGN MANDATORY NORMS
UNDER THE ROME CONVENTION 120 D. DOMESTIC MANDATORY NORMS UNDER THE ROME
CONVENTION 123 E. ROME CONVENTION TREATMENT OF FOREIGN MANDATORY 124
NORMS REFLECTS WIDELY ACCEPTED PRINCIPLES F. FURTHER AUTHORITY
SUPPORTING TREATMENT OF MANDATORY 127 NORMS UNDER THE ROME CONVENTION
MODEL C. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COURTS AND ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS IN RELATION
TO 128 MANDATORY NORMS D. APPLICATION OF MANDATORY NORMS IN ARBITRATION
PRACTICE AND 129 THEORY 1. ARBITRATION PRACTICE 129 2. LEGAL LITERATURE
134 E. PROPER APPROACH TO THE APPLICATION OF EC COMPETITION LAW BY 139
ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS 1. ENFORCEABLE AND UNENFORCEABLE DUTY UPON
ARBITRATORS 139 2. ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATIONS UPON ARBITRATORS 141 A.
ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATIONS ARE ONLY EVER "ENFORCEABLE" ON 141 ARBITRATORS
IN AN INDIRECT SENSE B. PROVISIONS ON APPLICABLE LAW IN ARBITRATION LAWS
141 VIII MODERNISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION C.
IS THERE ANY ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATION UNDER ARBITRATION 142 LAWS TO
DETERMINE THE APPLICABLE LAW IN A CERTAIN MANNER? D. UNSYSTEMATIC AND
VIRTUALLY ADVENTITIOUS NATURE OF 144 JUDICIAL JURISDICTION TO INTERFERE
WITH ARBITRATION AWARDS 3. ENFORCEABLE OBLIGATIONS ON ARBITRATORS AND
THE APPLICATION OF 145 EC COMPETITION LAW A. COURTS OF EU MEMBER STATES
145 B. COURTS OF STATES NOT BELONGING TO THE EU 148 C. COMPETITION
AUTHORITIES 152 4. UNENFORCEABLE DUTY ON ARBITRATORS 154 5. APPLYING
MANDATORY NORMS IN ARBITRATION 156 III. MUST ARBITRATORS RAISE MANDATORY
NORMS OF THEIR OWN MOTION? 158 A. GENERAL 158 B. PRACTICAL LIMITS ON
ARBITRATORS' OBLIGATION TO APPLY MANDATORY 159 NORMS OF THEIR OWN MOTION
CHAPTER 7 - TAKING EC COMPETITION LAW SERIOUSLY 161 I. COMPETITION LAW
AS MANDATORY NORMS 161 A. STATES'INTERESTS 161 B. THE TERRITORIALITY
PRINCIPLE AND COMPETITION LAW 163 1. EFFECTS ON MARKETS 163 2.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE POSITION UNDER US LAW 164 II. THE APPLICATION OF EC
COMPETITION LAW 169 A. OUTER LIMITS OF THE APPLICATION OFEC COMPETITION
LAW 169 1. QUALIFIED EFFECTS 169 2. RESPECTIVE APPLICATION OF EC AND
MEMBER STATE COMPETITION 172 LAWS A. EFFECT ON TRADE BETWEEN THE EU
MEMBER STATES 172 B. THE EFFECT ON TRADE GUIDELINES 179 C. SUBSIDIARITY
183 D. PROPORTIONALITY 183 B. COMPLICATIONS UNDER EU LAW IN DISCERNING
WHICH OF ITS NORMS ARE 184 MANDATORY C. THE EU'S POLICY ON APPLICATION
OF EC COMPETITION LAW 186 D. LIMITS TO APPLICATION OF EC COMPETITION LAW
INHERING WITHIN THE 189 EU LEGAL ORDER ITSELF 1. MATERIAL EXTENT OF
APPLICATION OF EC COMPETITION LAW 189 2. LIMITS DUE TO PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS OF THE LEX FORI 192 A. GENERAL 192 B. VAN SCHIJNDEL 192 C.
PETERBROECK 194 D. ECO SWISS 194 E. CONCLUSIONS ON THESE THREE
PRELIMINARY REFERENCE 197 DECISIONS OF THE ECJ TABLE OF CONTENTS IX 3.
COMPETITION BETWEEN AN EU LAW RULE AND A SUBSTANTIVE 207 MEMBER STATE
RULE 4. THE ORIGIN OF THE EU NORM WITHIN THE COMMUNITY LEGAL 209 ORDER
5. APPLICATION OFHARDCORE PROHIBITION MORE COMPELLING 215 6. DISTINCTION
AS TO PARTICULAR OBJECTIVES OF EC COMPETITION LAW 217 7. DISTINCTION IN
RELATION TO EFFECTS OF EC COMPETITION LAW 217 8. DISTINCTION BETWEEN
HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL RESTRAINTS 220 9. THE IMPERATIVITY OF MARKET
DEFINITION UNDER EC COMPETITION 220 LAW III. THE IMPERATIVITY ASSESSMENT
BY ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS 221 A. GENERAL 221 B. LIMITATIONS EXTENDING FROM
THE ARBITRATION CONTEXT 221 C. ASSESSMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE IMPORTANCEOF
COMPETITION LAW 221 D. COMPETING PUBLIC POLICY CLAIMS OF TWO OR MORE
STATES 227 IV. ARE ARBITRATORS UNDER AN OBLIGATION TO APPLY EC
COMPETITION LAW OF 229 THEIR OWN MOTION? V. THE SUPPLEMENTARY
APPLICATION OF THE LEX ARBITRII AND THE LEX CAUSAE 230 CHAPTER 8 - EC
COMPETITION LAW ASSISTANCE IN 237 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION I.
NON-MANDATORY STATEMENTS OFEC COMPETITION LAW 237 A. COMMISSION NOTICES
237 B. OTHER NON-BINDING STATEMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION 237 C. TREATMENT
OF NON-BINDING STATEMENTS OF EC COMPETITION LAW BY 240 ARBITRATORS II.
INFLUENCE ON ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS OF OTHER BODIES' PRIOR APPLICATIONS OF
240 LEGAL NORMS A. CRITICAL ROLE OF PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS IN
PRIVATE 240 COMPETITION LAW PROCEEDINGS B. BASES UPON WHICH ARBITRAL
TRIBUNALS MAY RELY ON PRIOR 241 DETERMINATIONS 1. DISTINCTION BETWEEN
MANDATORY NORMS AND APPLICATIONS OF 241 MANDATORY NORMS 2. TREATMENT OF
PRIOR DECISIONS BY ARBITRATORS 242 A. RES JUDICATA 242 B. VALUES OUTSIDE
OFTHOSE BEHIND RES JUDICATA 246 C. PARALLEL BETWEEN FOREIGN MANDATORY
NORMS AND FOREIGN 246 DECISIONS AND AWARDS 3. FACTORS AFFECTING DEGREE
OF ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS' RELIANCE ON 247 PRIOR DETERMINATIONS A. RIGHTS
OF DEFENCE 247 B. SIMILARITY OF THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE TWO
PROCEEDINGS 248 C. INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCE OF PRIOR DECISION-MAKER 248
D. THE COGENCY OF THE ANALYSIS 249 E. NATURE OF THE PRIOR DECISION 249 X
MODEMISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION III.
ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS' TREATMENT OF PRIOR DETERMINATIONS ON EC 249
COMPETITION LAW A. GENERAL 249 B. AUTHORITY OF EC COMPETITION LAW
DECISIONS UNDER MEMBER STATE 250 LAW C. AUTHORITY OF EC COMPETITION LAW
DECISIONS UNDER COMMUNITY 251 LAW 1. GENERAL 251 2. COMMUNITY COURTS 252
3. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 253 A. GENERAL 253 B. BASES FOR THE AUTHORITY
OF COMMISSION DECISIONS UNDER 253 COMMUNITY LAW C. APPLICATION TO
ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS 256 D. EXTENT OF AUTHORITY OF COMMISSION DECISIONS
UNDER 256 COMMUNITY LAW 4. MEMBER STATE COMPETITION AUTHORITIES 260 5.
MEMBER STATE COURTS 261 D. CONSIDERATIONS RELEVANT TO ARBITRATORS'
WEIGHTING OF PRIOR EC 261 COMPETITION LAW DETERMINATIONS 1. RIGHTS OF
THE DEFENCE 261 2. SIMILARITY OF ISSUES 262 3. INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCE
OF FIRST DECISION MAKER 265 4. THE NATURE OF THE DECISION 269 IV. EFFECT
ON ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS OF CONTEMPORANEOUS PROCEEDINGS BEFORE 274 OTHER
BODIES V. INTERVENTION OF COMMISSION AND MEMBER STATE COMPETITION
AUTHORITIES 278 IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS A. THE MODERNISATION
REGULATION 278 B. LEGAL NATURE OF THE COMMISSION'S INTERVENTION 280 C.
BASIS UPON WHICH THE COMMISSION MAY PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO 282
ARBITRATION TRIBUNALS D. COMMUNITY LAW LIMITS ON ASSISTANCE TO ARBITRAL
TRIBUNALS 282 E. CONFIDENTIALITY RESTRICTIONS UNDER ARBITRATION LAW 289
CHAPTER 9 - OVERVIEW OF SUBSTANTIVE ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE 295 I.
GATHERING EVIDENCE 295 A. GENERAL 295 B. SOURCES 296 1. AUTHORITATIVE OR
PERSUASIVE DETERMINATIONS FROM OTHER BODIES 296 2. ASSISTANCE FROM OTHER
DECISION MAKERS 296 3. SEARCHES 296 4. PRODUCTION ORDERS 297 5.
COMPELLING OF WITNESSES 298 6. MARKET KNOWLEDGE 298 7. ECONOMIC
CONSULTANTS 300 TABLE OF CONTENTS XI 8. TYPES OF ANALYSIS FREQUENTLY
CONDUCTED BY ECONOMIC 302 CONSULTANTS A. EMPIRICAL 302 B. ECONOMETRICS
303 9. ACCOUNTANTS 304 II. MARKET POWER - A FOUNDATIONAL CONCEPT 304
III. DETERMINATIONS 304 A. GENERAL 306 B. MARKET DEFINITION 307 1. THE
USES OF MARKET DEFINITION 307 2. THE COMMISSION'S TREATMENT OF MARKET
DEFINITION 308 3. OTHER COMMON TESTS USED IN RELATION TO MARKET
DEFINITION 311 C. MARKET SHARE 312 D. DRAWING CONCLUSIONS FROM MARKET
SHARES 312 E. REFINING MARKET POWER ANALYSIS 315 F. REVIEW OF ISSUES
RELATING TO ARTICLE 81 (3) EC 316 G. DOMINANCE 318 H. DISTORTIONS TO
COMPETITION 319 1. DEMONSTRATING EFFECTS ON COMPETITION 319 2.
QUANTIFYING DAMAGES 320 CHAPTER 10 - LEGAL RELIEF 323 I. PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OFEC COMPETITION LAW 323 II. BUERDEN OFPROOF 325 III.
STANDARD OFPROOF 326 IV. TIME BARRING 327 V. PROVISIONAL MEASURES 328 A.
GENERAL 328 B. APPLICABLE LAW 329 C. WHERE TO APPLY FOR INTERIM MEASURES
333 VI. SEVERANCE 335 A. GENERAL 335 B. SEVERANCE UNDER SURVEYED STATES'
LAW 336 1. GENERALLY 336 2. SEVERANCE UNDER SVVISS LAW 336 3. SEVERANCE
UNDER ENGLISH LAW 337 4. SEVERANCE UNDER FRENCH LAW 337 5. SEVERANCE
UNDER GERMAN LAW 338 6. SEVERANCE UNDER DUTCH LAW 338 VII. DAMAGES 338
A. GENERAL 338 B. COMPONENTS OF DAMAGES CLAIMS 342 1. GENERAL 342 2.
VIOLATION OFEC COMPETITION LAW 343 3. CAUSATION 344 4. DAMAGES 345 XII
MODERNISED EC COMPETITION LAW IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION VIII. A. B.
C. D. E. F. 5. SWISS LAW 6. ENGLISH LAW 7. FRENCH LAW 8. GERMAN LAW 9.
DUTCH LAW RESTITUTION GENERAL SWISS LAW ENGLISH LAW FRENCH LAW GERMAN
LAW DUTCH LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY INDEX 346 346 347 348 349 350 350 350 351 352
352 352 353 363 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Landolt, Phillip 1967- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1188469975 |
| author_facet | Landolt, Phillip 1967- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Landolt, Phillip 1967- |
| author_variant | p l pl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV021551398 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJE6536 |
| callnumber-raw | KJE6536 |
| callnumber-search | KJE6536 |
| callnumber-sort | KJE 46536 |
| classification_rvk | PS 3360 PT 350 PZ 3300 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)64450625 (DE-599)BVBBV021551398 |
| dewey-full | 343.40721 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 343 - Military, tax, trade & industrial law |
| dewey-raw | 343.40721 |
| dewey-search | 343.40721 |
| dewey-sort | 3343.40721 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021551398</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190708</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">060418s2006 ne |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9041123520</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-2352-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">904112358X</subfield><subfield code="9">90-411-2358-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)64450625</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021551398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ne</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-NL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE6536</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">343.40721</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3360</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139766:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 350</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139874:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PZ 3300</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141167:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Landolt, Phillip</subfield><subfield code="d">1967-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1188469975</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration</subfield><subfield code="c">Phillip Landolt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">The Hague</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Law International</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIV, 365 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europees recht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Wettbewerbsrecht - Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale arbitrage</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mededingingsrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europarecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Competition, Unfair</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121924-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union - Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wettbewerbsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4121924-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4162055-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014767468&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014767468</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europäische Union - Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit swd Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| geographic_facet | Europäische Union - Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| id | DE-604.BV021551398 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T14:31:48Z |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T11:12:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9041123520 904112358X |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014767468 |
| oclc_num | 64450625 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-20 DE-521 DE-11 DE-188 DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-20 DE-521 DE-11 DE-188 DE-384 |
| physical | XXIV, 365 S. |
| publishDate | 2006 |
| publishDateSearch | 2006 |
| publishDateSort | 2006 |
| publisher | Kluwer Law International |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Landolt, Phillip 1967- Verfasser (DE-588)1188469975 aut Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration Phillip Landolt The Hague Kluwer Law International 2006 XXIV, 365 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Europees recht gtt Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Wettbewerbsrecht - Europäische Union swd Internationale arbitrage gtt Mededingingsrecht gtt Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Europäische Union swd Europarecht Arbitration, International Competition, Unfair European Union countries Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd rswk-swf Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union - Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit swd Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 s Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014767468&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Landolt, Phillip 1967- Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europees recht gtt Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Wettbewerbsrecht - Europäische Union swd Internationale arbitrage gtt Mededingingsrecht gtt Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Europäische Union swd Europarecht Arbitration, International Competition, Unfair European Union countries Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4162055-0 (DE-588)4121924-7 |
| title | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration |
| title_auth | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration |
| title_exact_search | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration |
| title_full | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration Phillip Landolt |
| title_fullStr | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration Phillip Landolt |
| title_full_unstemmed | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration Phillip Landolt |
| title_short | Modernised EC competition law in international arbitration |
| title_sort | modernised ec competition law in international arbitration |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europees recht gtt Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Wettbewerbsrecht - Europäische Union swd Internationale arbitrage gtt Mededingingsrecht gtt Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Europäische Union swd Europarecht Arbitration, International Competition, Unfair European Union countries Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4162055-0 gnd Wettbewerbsrecht (DE-588)4121924-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Europees recht Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Wettbewerbsrecht - Europäische Union Internationale arbitrage Mededingingsrecht Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit - Europäische Union Europarecht Arbitration, International Competition, Unfair European Union countries Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Wettbewerbsrecht Europäische Union - Wettbewerbsrecht - Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014767468&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT landoltphillip modernisedeccompetitionlawininternationalarbitration |