The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection:
"This paper develops a new analysis of the U. S. economy in the 1920s that is illuminated by contrasts with the 1990s, and it also re-examines the causes of the Great Depression. In both the 1920s and the 1990s the acceleration of productivity growth linked to the delayed effects of previously...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2005
|
Schriftenreihe: | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series
11778 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "This paper develops a new analysis of the U. S. economy in the 1920s that is illuminated by contrasts with the 1990s, and it also re-examines the causes of the Great Depression. In both the 1920s and the 1990s the acceleration of productivity growth linked to the delayed effects of previously invented "general purpose technologies" stimulated an increase in fixed investment that became excessive and proved to be unsustainable, while the productivity acceleration helps to account for low inflation in both decades The uncanny parallel of the stock market boom, bubble, and collapse in 1995-2001 as in 1924-1930, reminds us that business cycles emerge from the complex interplay of multiple factors, not just one.Common elements between the two decades are overshadowed by differences, including the much larger share of agricultural output in the 1920s, the weakness of farm prices throughout the decade, and the role of collapsing farm prices in the pervasive post-1929 downward shift in aggregate demand. Another partly related difference was a high volatility of inventory accumulation that reflected the larger share of agriculture and manufacturing in the economy of the 1920s. Failures of public policy in the 1920s included the absence of deposit insurance, the unit-banking regulations that prevented the diversification of financial risk across regions, and the low margin requirements that exacerbated swings in stock market prices Further, the 1920s witnessed the advent of protectionism and the sharp curtailment of immigration.The stability of the American economy after the 2000-01 collapse of investment and the stock market proves that good public policy matters, going beyond the narrowly defined operations of monetary and fiscal policy. Such highly diverse policies as banking regulation, deposit insurance, margin rules, reduction of tariffs, and loose restrictions on immigration all combine to make today's American economy more stable and less fragile than in the 1920s"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site |
Beschreibung: | 41, [17] S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV021481612 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20090624 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 060221s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)62717140 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021481612 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-521 |a DE-19 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HB1 | |
084 | |a QB 910 |0 (DE-625)141231: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gordon, Robert J. |d 1940- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)128405279 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection |c Robert J. Gordon |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a The nineteen hundred and twenties and the nineteen hundred and nineties in mutual reflection |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2005 | |
300 | |a 41, [17] S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11778 | |
520 | 3 | |a "This paper develops a new analysis of the U. S. economy in the 1920s that is illuminated by contrasts with the 1990s, and it also re-examines the causes of the Great Depression. In both the 1920s and the 1990s the acceleration of productivity growth linked to the delayed effects of previously invented "general purpose technologies" stimulated an increase in fixed investment that became excessive and proved to be unsustainable, while the productivity acceleration helps to account for low inflation in both decades | |
520 | 3 | |a The uncanny parallel of the stock market boom, bubble, and collapse in 1995-2001 as in 1924-1930, reminds us that business cycles emerge from the complex interplay of multiple factors, not just one.Common elements between the two decades are overshadowed by differences, including the much larger share of agricultural output in the 1920s, the weakness of farm prices throughout the decade, and the role of collapsing farm prices in the pervasive post-1929 downward shift in aggregate demand. Another partly related difference was a high volatility of inventory accumulation that reflected the larger share of agriculture and manufacturing in the economy of the 1920s. Failures of public policy in the 1920s included the absence of deposit insurance, the unit-banking regulations that prevented the diversification of financial risk across regions, and the low margin requirements that exacerbated swings in stock market prices | |
520 | 3 | |a Further, the 1920s witnessed the advent of protectionism and the sharp curtailment of immigration.The stability of the American economy after the 2000-01 collapse of investment and the stock market proves that good public policy matters, going beyond the narrowly defined operations of monetary and fiscal policy. Such highly diverse policies as banking regulation, deposit insurance, margin rules, reduction of tariffs, and loose restrictions on immigration all combine to make today's American economy more stable and less fragile than in the 1920s"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site | |
650 | 4 | |a Wirtschaft | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 4 | |a United States |x Economic conditions |y 1918-1945 | |
651 | 4 | |a United States |x Economic conditions |y 1981-2001 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Internetausgabe |
830 | 0 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11778 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 11778 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11778.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014664003 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804135162997374976 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Gordon, Robert J. 1940- |
author_GND | (DE-588)128405279 |
author_facet | Gordon, Robert J. 1940- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Gordon, Robert J. 1940- |
author_variant | r j g rj rjg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV021481612 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HB1 |
callnumber-raw | HB1 |
callnumber-search | HB1 |
callnumber-sort | HB 11 |
callnumber-subject | HB - Economic Theory and Demography |
classification_rvk | QB 910 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)62717140 (DE-599)BVBBV021481612 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03588nam a2200421 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021481612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20090624 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">060221s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)62717140</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021481612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">QB 910</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141231:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gordon, Robert J.</subfield><subfield code="d">1940-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)128405279</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection</subfield><subfield code="c">Robert J. Gordon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">The nineteen hundred and twenties and the nineteen hundred and nineties in mutual reflection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">41, [17] S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11778</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This paper develops a new analysis of the U. S. economy in the 1920s that is illuminated by contrasts with the 1990s, and it also re-examines the causes of the Great Depression. In both the 1920s and the 1990s the acceleration of productivity growth linked to the delayed effects of previously invented "general purpose technologies" stimulated an increase in fixed investment that became excessive and proved to be unsustainable, while the productivity acceleration helps to account for low inflation in both decades</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> The uncanny parallel of the stock market boom, bubble, and collapse in 1995-2001 as in 1924-1930, reminds us that business cycles emerge from the complex interplay of multiple factors, not just one.Common elements between the two decades are overshadowed by differences, including the much larger share of agricultural output in the 1920s, the weakness of farm prices throughout the decade, and the role of collapsing farm prices in the pervasive post-1929 downward shift in aggregate demand. Another partly related difference was a high volatility of inventory accumulation that reflected the larger share of agriculture and manufacturing in the economy of the 1920s. Failures of public policy in the 1920s included the absence of deposit insurance, the unit-banking regulations that prevented the diversification of financial risk across regions, and the low margin requirements that exacerbated swings in stock market prices</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> Further, the 1920s witnessed the advent of protectionism and the sharp curtailment of immigration.The stability of the American economy after the 2000-01 collapse of investment and the stock market proves that good public policy matters, going beyond the narrowly defined operations of monetary and fiscal policy. Such highly diverse policies as banking regulation, deposit insurance, margin rules, reduction of tariffs, and loose restrictions on immigration all combine to make today's American economy more stable and less fragile than in the 1920s"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wirtschaft</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Economic conditions</subfield><subfield code="y">1918-1945</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Economic conditions</subfield><subfield code="y">1981-2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Internetausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11778</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">11778</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11778.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014664003</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA United States Economic conditions 1918-1945 United States Economic conditions 1981-2001 |
geographic_facet | USA United States Economic conditions 1918-1945 United States Economic conditions 1981-2001 |
id | DE-604.BV021481612 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T14:04:47Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:36:08Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014664003 |
oclc_num | 62717140 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-703 DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-703 DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 41, [17] S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 2005 |
publishDateSearch | 2005 |
publishDateSort | 2005 |
publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
record_format | marc |
series | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
series2 | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
spelling | Gordon, Robert J. 1940- Verfasser (DE-588)128405279 aut The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection Robert J. Gordon The nineteen hundred and twenties and the nineteen hundred and nineties in mutual reflection Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2005 41, [17] S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11778 "This paper develops a new analysis of the U. S. economy in the 1920s that is illuminated by contrasts with the 1990s, and it also re-examines the causes of the Great Depression. In both the 1920s and the 1990s the acceleration of productivity growth linked to the delayed effects of previously invented "general purpose technologies" stimulated an increase in fixed investment that became excessive and proved to be unsustainable, while the productivity acceleration helps to account for low inflation in both decades The uncanny parallel of the stock market boom, bubble, and collapse in 1995-2001 as in 1924-1930, reminds us that business cycles emerge from the complex interplay of multiple factors, not just one.Common elements between the two decades are overshadowed by differences, including the much larger share of agricultural output in the 1920s, the weakness of farm prices throughout the decade, and the role of collapsing farm prices in the pervasive post-1929 downward shift in aggregate demand. Another partly related difference was a high volatility of inventory accumulation that reflected the larger share of agriculture and manufacturing in the economy of the 1920s. Failures of public policy in the 1920s included the absence of deposit insurance, the unit-banking regulations that prevented the diversification of financial risk across regions, and the low margin requirements that exacerbated swings in stock market prices Further, the 1920s witnessed the advent of protectionism and the sharp curtailment of immigration.The stability of the American economy after the 2000-01 collapse of investment and the stock market proves that good public policy matters, going beyond the narrowly defined operations of monetary and fiscal policy. Such highly diverse policies as banking regulation, deposit insurance, margin rules, reduction of tariffs, and loose restrictions on immigration all combine to make today's American economy more stable and less fragile than in the 1920s"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site Wirtschaft USA United States Economic conditions 1918-1945 United States Economic conditions 1981-2001 Erscheint auch als Internetausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11778 (DE-604)BV002801238 11778 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11778.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Gordon, Robert J. 1940- The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series Wirtschaft |
title | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection |
title_alt | The nineteen hundred and twenties and the nineteen hundred and nineties in mutual reflection |
title_auth | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection |
title_exact_search | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection |
title_exact_search_txtP | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection |
title_full | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection Robert J. Gordon |
title_fullStr | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection Robert J. Gordon |
title_full_unstemmed | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection Robert J. Gordon |
title_short | The 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection |
title_sort | the 1920s and the 1990s in mutual reflection |
topic | Wirtschaft |
topic_facet | Wirtschaft USA United States Economic conditions 1918-1945 United States Economic conditions 1981-2001 |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11778.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gordonrobertj the1920sandthe1990sinmutualreflection AT gordonrobertj thenineteenhundredandtwentiesandthenineteenhundredandninetiesinmutualreflection |