Towards a European unfair competition law: a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Leiden [u.a.]
Nijhoff
2006
|
Schriftenreihe: | Intellectual property law library
1 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XVII, 380 S. |
ISBN: | 9004150404 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV021462793 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20100722 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 060223s2006 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9004150404 |9 90-04-15040-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)62897666 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021462793 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-19 |a DE-20 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KJC2799 | |
082 | 0 | |a 343/.072 |2 22 | |
084 | |a PS 3760 |0 (DE-625)139788: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Vrey, Rogier W. de |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Towards a European unfair competition law |b a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments |c by Rogier W. de Vrey |
264 | 1 | |a Leiden [u.a.] |b Nijhoff |c 2006 | |
300 | |a XVII, 380 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Intellectual property law library |v 1 | |
502 | |a Zugl.: Utrecht, Univ., Diss., 2005 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Concurrence déloyale | |
650 | 4 | |a Concurrence déloyale - Europe | |
650 | 7 | |a Europees recht |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Harmonisatie |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Mededingingsrecht |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Europarecht | |
650 | 4 | |a Competition, Unfair | |
650 | 4 | |a Competition, Unfair |z Europe | |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
830 | 0 | |a Intellectual property law library |v 1 |w (DE-604)BV021525131 |9 1 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014682712&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014682712 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804135186678415360 |
---|---|
adam_text | TOWARDS A EUROPEAN UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW A CLASH BETWEEN LEGAL FAMILIES
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH, GER MAN AND DUTCH LAW IN LIGHT OF
EXISTING EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS BY ROGIER W. DE
VREY MARTINUS NIJHOFF PUBLISHERS LEIDEN / BOSTON TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE V LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XIII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE
EUROPEANIZATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW 1 1.2 THESIS 4 1.3
DELIMITATION OF THERESEARCH 5 1.4 METHODOLOGY 7 1.5 TERMINOLOGY 8 1.6
PLANOFACTION 9 CHAPTER 2: INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW 11 2.1
INTRODUCTION 11 2.2 INTERNATIONAL RULES ON UNFAIR COMPETITION 12 2.2.1
THE PARIS CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 12 A
GENERAL CLAUSE 13 B SPECIFIC CASES OF UNFAIR COMPETITION 14 C LEGAL
REDRESS 15 2.2.2 SPECIAL AGREEMENTS FOLLOWING THE PARIS CONVENTION 16
2.2.3 TRIPS 17 2.2.4 WIPO MODEL PROVISIONS ON PROTECTION AGAINST UNFAIR
COMPETITION 18 2.2.5 THE INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE OF COMPETITION LAW 22
2.2.6 CONCLUSIONS 23 2.3 UNFAIR COMPETITION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITY 24 2.3.1 INTRODUCTION 24 2.3.2 THE NEED FOR HARMONISATION 27
2.3.3 COMMUNITY HARMONISATION SO FAR 29 2.3.4 PRIMARY EUROPEAN UNION LAW
30 2.3.5 SECONDARY EUROPEAN UNION LAW 33 2.3.5.1 THE ULMER COMPARATIVE
STUDY 33 2.3.5.2 HARMONISATION IN SPECIFIC AREAS 35 A MISLEADING
ADVERTISING DIRECTIVE 35 B CASES OF VERY SPECIFIC EU REGULATION RELATING
TO UNFAIR COMPETITION 37 CONTENTS C UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW ACCOMMODATED
IN OTHER AREAS OF LAW 37 D COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING DIRECTIVE 39 E
E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE 40 F CONCLUSIONS 42 2.3.6 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION
OF HUMAN RIGHTS 43 2.4 THE INTRODUCTION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION IN UNFAIR
COMPETITION LAW 45 2.5 COMMON PRINCIPLES SUGGESTED IN LEGAL DOCTRINE AS
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO HARMONISATION 48 2.5.1 UNJUST ENRICHMENT 48
2.5.2 THE DOCTRINE OF MISAPPROPRIATION 50 2.6 NEW EUROPEAN LEGISLATIVE
INITIATIVES 52 2.6.1 DRAFT REGULATION ON SALES PROMOTIONS 53 2.6.2 THE
UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES DIRECTIVE 55 2.6.2.1 THE GREEN PAPER AND ITS
FOLLOW-UP 55 2.6.2.2 AN ANALYSIS OFTHE UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES
DIRECTIVE 57 A INTRODUCTION 57 B TOTAL HARMONISATION 58 C CONFINED TO
B2C RELATIONS 59 D THE COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN RULE 64 E GENERAL CLAUSE 65 F
SPECIFIC CLAUSES; MISLEADING COMMERCIAL PRACTICES 68 G SPECIFIC CLAUSES;
AGGRESSIVE COMMERCIAL PRACTICES 69 H BLACKLIST OF UNFAIR COMMERCIAL
PRACTICES 70 I REMEDIES 72 2.7 CONCLUSION 75 CHAPTER 3: DUTCH LAW 79 3.1
INTRODUCTION 79 3.2 FREEDOMOF TRADE 79 3.3 LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF
UNFAIR COMPETITION 80 3.3.1 THE 19TH CENTURY 80 3.3.2 BILLS BEFORE
PARLIAMENT 84 3.3.3 CRIMINAL LAW REGULATIONOF 1915 85 3.3.4 THE
LINDENBAUM/COHEN CASE OFTHE HOGE RAAD 86 3.3.5 THE 1941 AND 1963
PRELIMINARY REPORTS AND THE DRAFT NBW LEGISLATION 87 A THE 1941
PRELIMINARY REPORTS 87 B THE 1963 PRELIMINARY REPORTS 89 3.3.6 THE 1967
REPORT BY THE COMMITTEE OF ORDERLY COMMERCE 90 3.3.7 THE 1971
SERPROPOSAL 91 3.3.8 DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING THE 1971 SERPROPOSAL 93 VIN
CONTENTS 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.3.9 VOICES IN LITERATURE 1971-1992 3.3.10 NEW
CIVIL CODE 1992 3.3.11 VOICES IN LITERATURE 1992-PRESENT 3.3.12
CONCLUSIONS SCOPE OF PROTECTION ACTS PROHIBITED UNDER UNFAIR COMPETITION
LAW 3.5.1 INTRODUCTION 3.5.2 CLASSIFICATION OF ACTS PROHIBITED UNDER
UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW 3.5.3 MISLEADING THE PUBLIC: MISLEADING
ADVERTISING 3.5.3.1 PROVISIONS IN THE CIVIL CODE 3.5.3.2 ART. 6:194-196
BW A MISLEADING B BUERDEN OF PROOF C SANCTIONS 3.5.3.3 SEIFREGULATION
3.5.4 DISCREDITING COMPETITORS 3.5.5 IMITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION
3.5.5.1 SLAVISH IMITATION A DISTINCTIVENESS B CONFUSION C SIMILARITY
REGARDING FEATURES THAT ARE NOT IMPORTANT FOR THE RELIABILITY AND
USEFULNESS OFTHE PRODUCT D NEEDLESS CONFUSION 3.5.5.2 SLAVISH IMITATION;
CONTROVERSIES IN LITERATURE A THE REQUIREMENT OF CONFUSION B THE
REFLEX-EFFECT C TERM OF PROTECTION 3.5.5.3 THE IMITATION OF BADGES OF
TRADE 3.5.5.4 MISAPPROPRIATION OF (VALUABLE) INTANGIBLES A INTRODUCTION
B EQUIVALENT PERFORMANCE C STATUTORY REGULATION D SURVEY OF TOPICS OF
DISCUSSION CONCERNING SWEAT OFTHE BROW PROTECTION E CONCLUSION 3.5.5.5
PROTECTING KNOW-HOW CONCLUSION CHAPTER 4: GERMAN LAW 4.1 4.2
INTRODUCTION LEEISLATIVE DEVELONMENT OF UNFAIR CONROETITION 94 96 97 97
100 101 101 102 104 104 105 105 108 108 110 111 112 113 116 117 119 120
120 121 126 127 129 135 135 135 138 140 142 142 145 147 147 148 IX
CONTENTS 4.2.1 THEOUTSET 148 4.2.2 UWG 1896 150 4.2.3 UWG 1909 150 4.2.4
SUBSEQUENT CHANGES TO THE UWG 1909 152 4.2.5 UWG 2004 153 4.3 SCOPE OF
PROTECTION 157 4.3.1 SCOPE OFTHE UWG 1909 157 4.3.2 SCOPE OFTHE UWG 2004
158 4.3.3 REMEDIES UNDER THE UWG 2004 160 4.4 CLASSIFICATION OF ACTS OF
UNFAIR COMPETITION 165 4.5 THE GENERAL CLAUSE 166 4.5.1 INTRODUCTION 166
4.5.2 UWG 1909 - GUTEN SITTEN 166 4.5.3 UWG 2004 - UNLAUTERKEIF 169
4.6 MISLEADING THE PUBLIC 170 4.6.1 INTRODUCTION 170 4.6.2 PREREQUISITES
171 4.6.3 MISLEADING 172 4.6.4 SPECIFIC CASES OF MISLEADING ADVERTISING
175 4.7 DISCREDITING COMPETITORS 176 4.7.1 INTRODUCTION 176 4.7.2 TRADE
LIBELBY STATEMENTS OFOPINION 176 4.7.3 TRADE LIBELBY STATEMENTS OFFACT
177 4.8 IMITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION 178 4.8.1 INTRODUCTION 178 4.8.2
FREEDOM OF COMPETITION 179 4.8.3 UNLAWFUL IMITATION BY MISREPRESENTATION
OR MISAPPROPRIATION 180 4.8.3.1 INTRODUCTION 180 4.8.3.2 COMPETITIVE
CHARACTERISTICS 180 4.8.3.3 GRADE OF IMITATION 182 A DIRECT IMITATION
182 B VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL IMITATION 182 C IMITATION WITH SUFFICIENT
SIMILARITIES 183 4.8.3.4 SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES 183 A CONFUSION AS TO THE
ORIGIN 183 B EXPLOITATION OF ACOMPETITOR S REPUTATION 185 C OBTAINING
KNOWLEDGE AND DATA BY DISHONEST MEANS 186 D INSERTION INTO A
NON-PROPRIETARY SERIES 186 E OBSTRUCTING THE COMPETITOR 188 4.8.3.5
UNLAWFUL IMITATION OF ADVERTISEMENTS 189 4.8.3.6 LIMITATIONS IN TIME 191
4.8.3.7 EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS? 192 CONTENTS 4.8.3.8 CONCLUSION 193 4.8.4
PROTECTING KNOW-HOW 194 4.8.4.1 INTRODUCTION 194 4.8.4.2 THE DEFINITION
OF A TRADE SECRET 195 4.8.4.3 BETRAYAL OF TRADE SECRETS 196 4.8.4.4
INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE 197 4.8.4.5 EXPLOITATION OF TRADE SECRETS 198
4.8.4.6 EXPLOITATION OF ENTRUSTED SUBMITTALS OR TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS
198 4.8.4.7 SOLICITATION OR OFFER TO BETRAY TRADE SECRETS 199 4.9
CONCLUSION 200 CHAPTER 5: ENGLISH LAW 203 5.1 INTRODUCTION 203 5.2
REJECTION OF A GENERAL ACTION FOR UNFAIR COMPETITION 204 5.3 MISLEADING
ADVERTISING 207 5.3.1 INTRODUCTION 207 5.3.2 BRITISH CODE OF
ADVERTISING, SALES PROMOTION AND DIRECT MARKETING 207 5.3.3 ITC AND RA
BROADCASTING ADVERTISING CODES 209 5.3.4 ENFORCEMENT BY TRADING
STANDARDS DEPARTMENTS 211 5.3.5 CONTROL OF MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS
REGULATION 1988 212 5.3.6 CIVIL REMEDIES UNDER COMMON LAW 214 5.3.7
CRITERIA FOR MISLEADING 215 5.4 DISCREDITING ANOTHER S ENTERPRISE OR ITS
ACTIVITIES 220 5.4.1 INTRODUCTION 220 5.4.2 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD 221
5.4.2.1 INTRODUCTION 221 5.4.2.2 FALSEHOOD 222 5.4.2.3 MALICE 223
5.4.2.4 SPECIAL DAMAGE 224 5.4.3 DEFAMATION 225 5.4.3.1 INTRODUCTION 225
5.4.3.2 DEFAMATION IN RELATION TO MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD 226 5.4.3.3 TWO
TYPES OF DEFAMATION 227 5.4.3.4 DEFENCES TO AN ACTION FOR DEFAMATION 228
5.4.3.5 REMEDIES UNDER DEFAMATION 229 5.4.4 CMAR AND THE BRITISH CODES
OFCONDUCT 230 5.5 IMITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION 233 5.5.1 PASSING OFF
233 5.5.1.1 INTRODUCTION 233 5.5.1.2 MISREPRESENTATION 236 XI CONTENTS
5.5.1.3 GOODWILL 238 5.5.1.4 ACTUAL DAMAGE 240 5.5.1.5 RELATION TO THE
TRADE MARKS ACT 1994 244 5.5.1.6 THE TORTOF PASSING OFF AND ITS
BOUNDARIES 247 5.5.1.7 CONCLUSION 255 A CREATIONOFA TORTOF UNFAIR
COMPETITION? 255 B ARGUMENTS FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION
257 C ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE INTRODUCTION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION 262 D
FINAL OBSERVATIONS 264 5.5.2 PROTECTING KNOW-HOW 266 5.5.2.1
INTRODUCTION 266 5.5.2.2 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 267 5.5.2.3 OBLIGATION
OFCONFIDENCE 268 5.5.2.4 THIRDPARTIES 271 5.5.2.5 UNAUTHORISED USE 272
5.5.2.6 TRADE SECRETS AS PROPERTY RIGHTS 273 5.6 CONCLUSION 275 CHAPTER
6: COMPARATIVE LAW 277 6.1 INTRODUCTION 277 6.2 UNFAIR COMPETITION AS A
LEGAL CONCEPT 278 6.3 MISLEADING ADVERTISING 282 6.4 DENIGRATING ONE S
COMPETITOR 287 6.5 UNLAWFUL IMITATION BY MISREPRESENTATION 289 6.6
MISAPPROPRIATION OF ANOTHER S ACHIEVEMENTS 298 6.7 PROTECTING KNOW-HOW
301 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION 307 TABLEOF CASES 317 BIBLIOGRAPHY 330 INDEX
357 ANNEX I: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES DIRECTIVE 359 ANNEX II: WIPO
PROVISIONS ON PROTECTION AGAINST UNFAIR COMPETITION (1996) 377 XN
|
adam_txt |
TOWARDS A EUROPEAN UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW A CLASH BETWEEN LEGAL FAMILIES
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH, GER MAN AND DUTCH LAW IN LIGHT OF
EXISTING EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL INSTRUMENTS BY ROGIER W. DE
VREY MARTINUS NIJHOFF PUBLISHERS LEIDEN / BOSTON TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE V LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XIII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE
EUROPEANIZATION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW 1 1.2 THESIS 4 1.3
DELIMITATION OF THERESEARCH 5 1.4 METHODOLOGY 7 1.5 TERMINOLOGY 8 1.6
PLANOFACTION 9 CHAPTER 2: INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW 11 2.1
INTRODUCTION 11 2.2 INTERNATIONAL RULES ON UNFAIR COMPETITION 12 2.2.1
THE PARIS CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY 12 A
GENERAL CLAUSE 13 B SPECIFIC CASES OF UNFAIR COMPETITION 14 C LEGAL
REDRESS 15 2.2.2 SPECIAL AGREEMENTS FOLLOWING THE PARIS CONVENTION 16
2.2.3 TRIPS 17 2.2.4 WIPO MODEL PROVISIONS ON PROTECTION AGAINST UNFAIR
COMPETITION 18 2.2.5 THE INTERNATIONAL LEAGUE OF COMPETITION LAW 22
2.2.6 CONCLUSIONS 23 2.3 UNFAIR COMPETITION WITHIN THE EUROPEAN
COMMUNITY 24 2.3.1 INTRODUCTION 24 2.3.2 THE NEED FOR HARMONISATION 27
2.3.3 COMMUNITY HARMONISATION SO FAR 29 2.3.4 PRIMARY EUROPEAN UNION LAW
30 2.3.5 SECONDARY EUROPEAN UNION LAW 33 2.3.5.1 THE ULMER COMPARATIVE
STUDY 33 2.3.5.2 HARMONISATION IN SPECIFIC AREAS 35 A MISLEADING
ADVERTISING DIRECTIVE 35 B CASES OF VERY SPECIFIC EU REGULATION RELATING
TO UNFAIR COMPETITION 37 CONTENTS C UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW ACCOMMODATED
IN OTHER AREAS OF LAW 37 D COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING DIRECTIVE 39 E
E-COMMERCE DIRECTIVE 40 F CONCLUSIONS 42 2.3.6 THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION
OF HUMAN RIGHTS 43 2.4 THE INTRODUCTION OF CONSUMER PROTECTION IN UNFAIR
COMPETITION LAW 45 2.5 COMMON PRINCIPLES SUGGESTED IN LEGAL DOCTRINE AS
ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO HARMONISATION 48 2.5.1 UNJUST ENRICHMENT 48
2.5.2 THE DOCTRINE OF MISAPPROPRIATION 50 2.6 NEW EUROPEAN LEGISLATIVE
INITIATIVES 52 2.6.1 DRAFT REGULATION ON SALES PROMOTIONS 53 2.6.2 THE
UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES DIRECTIVE 55 2.6.2.1 THE GREEN PAPER AND ITS
FOLLOW-UP 55 2.6.2.2 AN ANALYSIS OFTHE UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES
DIRECTIVE 57 A INTRODUCTION 57 B TOTAL HARMONISATION 58 C CONFINED TO
B2C RELATIONS 59 D THE COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN RULE 64 E GENERAL CLAUSE 65 F
SPECIFIC CLAUSES; MISLEADING COMMERCIAL PRACTICES 68 G SPECIFIC CLAUSES;
AGGRESSIVE COMMERCIAL PRACTICES 69 H BLACKLIST OF UNFAIR COMMERCIAL
PRACTICES 70 I REMEDIES 72 2.7 CONCLUSION 75 CHAPTER 3: DUTCH LAW 79 3.1
INTRODUCTION 79 3.2 FREEDOMOF TRADE 79 3.3 LEGISLATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF
UNFAIR COMPETITION 80 3.3.1 THE 19TH CENTURY 80 3.3.2 BILLS BEFORE
PARLIAMENT 84 3.3.3 CRIMINAL LAW REGULATIONOF 1915 85 3.3.4 THE
LINDENBAUM/COHEN CASE OFTHE HOGE RAAD 86 3.3.5 THE 1941 AND 1963
PRELIMINARY REPORTS AND THE DRAFT NBW LEGISLATION 87 A THE 1941
PRELIMINARY REPORTS 87 B THE 1963 PRELIMINARY REPORTS 89 3.3.6 THE 1967
REPORT BY THE COMMITTEE OF ORDERLY COMMERCE 90 3.3.7 THE 1971
SERPROPOSAL 91 3.3.8 DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOWING THE 1971 SERPROPOSAL 93 VIN
CONTENTS 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.3.9 VOICES IN LITERATURE 1971-1992 3.3.10 NEW
CIVIL CODE 1992 3.3.11 VOICES IN LITERATURE 1992-PRESENT 3.3.12
CONCLUSIONS SCOPE OF PROTECTION ACTS PROHIBITED UNDER UNFAIR COMPETITION
LAW 3.5.1 INTRODUCTION 3.5.2 CLASSIFICATION OF ACTS PROHIBITED UNDER
UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW 3.5.3 MISLEADING THE PUBLIC: MISLEADING
ADVERTISING 3.5.3.1 PROVISIONS IN THE CIVIL CODE 3.5.3.2 ART. 6:194-196
BW A MISLEADING B BUERDEN OF PROOF C SANCTIONS 3.5.3.3 SEIFREGULATION
3.5.4 DISCREDITING COMPETITORS 3.5.5 IMITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION
3.5.5.1 SLAVISH IMITATION A DISTINCTIVENESS B CONFUSION C SIMILARITY
REGARDING FEATURES THAT ARE NOT IMPORTANT FOR THE RELIABILITY AND
USEFULNESS OFTHE PRODUCT D NEEDLESS CONFUSION 3.5.5.2 SLAVISH IMITATION;
CONTROVERSIES IN LITERATURE A THE REQUIREMENT OF CONFUSION B THE
'REFLEX-EFFECT' C TERM OF PROTECTION 3.5.5.3 THE IMITATION OF BADGES OF
TRADE 3.5.5.4 MISAPPROPRIATION OF (VALUABLE) INTANGIBLES A INTRODUCTION
B EQUIVALENT PERFORMANCE C STATUTORY REGULATION D SURVEY OF TOPICS OF
DISCUSSION CONCERNING SWEAT OFTHE BROW PROTECTION E CONCLUSION 3.5.5.5
PROTECTING KNOW-HOW CONCLUSION CHAPTER 4: GERMAN LAW 4.1 4.2
INTRODUCTION LEEISLATIVE DEVELONMENT OF UNFAIR CONROETITION 94 96 97 97
100 101 101 102 104 104 105 105 108 108 110 111 112 113 116 117 119 120
120 121 126 127 129 135 135 135 138 140 142 142 145 147 147 148 IX
CONTENTS 4.2.1 THEOUTSET 148 4.2.2 UWG 1896 150 4.2.3 UWG 1909 150 4.2.4
SUBSEQUENT CHANGES TO THE UWG 1909 152 4.2.5 UWG 2004 153 4.3 SCOPE OF
PROTECTION 157 4.3.1 SCOPE OFTHE UWG 1909 157 4.3.2 SCOPE OFTHE UWG 2004
158 4.3.3 REMEDIES UNDER THE UWG 2004 160 4.4 CLASSIFICATION OF ACTS OF
UNFAIR COMPETITION 165 4.5 THE GENERAL CLAUSE 166 4.5.1 INTRODUCTION 166
4.5.2 UWG 1909 - 'GUTEN SITTEN' 166 4.5.3 UWG 2004 - ' UNLAUTERKEIF 169
4.6 MISLEADING THE PUBLIC 170 4.6.1 INTRODUCTION 170 4.6.2 PREREQUISITES
171 4.6.3 MISLEADING 172 4.6.4 SPECIFIC CASES OF MISLEADING ADVERTISING
175 4.7 DISCREDITING COMPETITORS 176 4.7.1 INTRODUCTION 176 4.7.2 TRADE
LIBELBY STATEMENTS OFOPINION 176 4.7.3 TRADE LIBELBY STATEMENTS OFFACT
177 4.8 IMITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION 178 4.8.1 INTRODUCTION 178 4.8.2
FREEDOM OF COMPETITION 179 4.8.3 UNLAWFUL IMITATION BY MISREPRESENTATION
OR MISAPPROPRIATION 180 4.8.3.1 INTRODUCTION 180 4.8.3.2 COMPETITIVE
CHARACTERISTICS 180 4.8.3.3 GRADE OF IMITATION 182 A DIRECT IMITATION
182 B VIRTUALLY IDENTICAL IMITATION 182 C IMITATION WITH SUFFICIENT
SIMILARITIES 183 4.8.3.4 SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES 183 A CONFUSION AS TO THE
ORIGIN 183 B EXPLOITATION OF ACOMPETITOR'S REPUTATION 185 C OBTAINING
KNOWLEDGE AND DATA BY DISHONEST MEANS 186 D INSERTION INTO A
NON-PROPRIETARY SERIES 186 E OBSTRUCTING THE COMPETITOR 188 4.8.3.5
UNLAWFUL IMITATION OF ADVERTISEMENTS 189 4.8.3.6 LIMITATIONS IN TIME 191
4.8.3.7 EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS? 192 CONTENTS 4.8.3.8 CONCLUSION 193 4.8.4
PROTECTING KNOW-HOW 194 4.8.4.1 INTRODUCTION 194 4.8.4.2 THE DEFINITION
OF A TRADE SECRET 195 4.8.4.3 BETRAYAL OF TRADE SECRETS 196 4.8.4.4
INDUSTRIAL ESPIONAGE 197 4.8.4.5 EXPLOITATION OF TRADE SECRETS 198
4.8.4.6 EXPLOITATION OF ENTRUSTED SUBMITTALS OR TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS
198 4.8.4.7 SOLICITATION OR OFFER TO BETRAY TRADE SECRETS 199 4.9
CONCLUSION 200 CHAPTER 5: ENGLISH LAW 203 5.1 INTRODUCTION 203 5.2
REJECTION OF A GENERAL ACTION FOR UNFAIR COMPETITION 204 5.3 MISLEADING
ADVERTISING 207 5.3.1 INTRODUCTION 207 5.3.2 BRITISH CODE OF
ADVERTISING, SALES PROMOTION AND DIRECT MARKETING 207 5.3.3 ITC AND RA
BROADCASTING ADVERTISING CODES 209 5.3.4 ENFORCEMENT BY TRADING
STANDARDS DEPARTMENTS 211 5.3.5 CONTROL OF MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS
REGULATION 1988 212 5.3.6 CIVIL REMEDIES UNDER COMMON LAW 214 5.3.7
CRITERIA FOR MISLEADING 215 5.4 DISCREDITING ANOTHER'S ENTERPRISE OR ITS
ACTIVITIES 220 5.4.1 INTRODUCTION 220 5.4.2 MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD 221
5.4.2.1 INTRODUCTION 221 5.4.2.2 FALSEHOOD 222 5.4.2.3 MALICE 223
5.4.2.4 SPECIAL DAMAGE 224 5.4.3 DEFAMATION 225 5.4.3.1 INTRODUCTION 225
5.4.3.2 DEFAMATION IN RELATION TO MALICIOUS FALSEHOOD 226 5.4.3.3 TWO
TYPES OF DEFAMATION 227 5.4.3.4 DEFENCES TO AN ACTION FOR DEFAMATION 228
5.4.3.5 REMEDIES UNDER DEFAMATION 229 5.4.4 CMAR AND THE BRITISH CODES
OFCONDUCT 230 5.5 IMITATION AND MISAPPROPRIATION 233 5.5.1 PASSING OFF
233 5.5.1.1 INTRODUCTION 233 5.5.1.2 MISREPRESENTATION 236 XI CONTENTS
5.5.1.3 GOODWILL 238 5.5.1.4 ACTUAL DAMAGE 240 5.5.1.5 RELATION TO THE
TRADE MARKS ACT 1994 244 5.5.1.6 THE TORTOF PASSING OFF AND ITS
BOUNDARIES 247 5.5.1.7 CONCLUSION 255 A CREATIONOFA TORTOF UNFAIR
COMPETITION? 255 B ARGUMENTS FOR THE INTRODUCTION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION
257 C ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE INTRODUCTION OF UNFAIR COMPETITION 262 D
FINAL OBSERVATIONS 264 5.5.2 PROTECTING KNOW-HOW 266 5.5.2.1
INTRODUCTION 266 5.5.2.2 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 267 5.5.2.3 OBLIGATION
OFCONFIDENCE 268 5.5.2.4 THIRDPARTIES 271 5.5.2.5 UNAUTHORISED USE 272
5.5.2.6 TRADE SECRETS AS PROPERTY RIGHTS 273 5.6 CONCLUSION 275 CHAPTER
6: COMPARATIVE LAW 277 6.1 INTRODUCTION 277 6.2 UNFAIR COMPETITION AS A
LEGAL CONCEPT 278 6.3 MISLEADING ADVERTISING 282 6.4 DENIGRATING ONE'S
COMPETITOR 287 6.5 UNLAWFUL IMITATION BY MISREPRESENTATION 289 6.6
MISAPPROPRIATION OF ANOTHER'S ACHIEVEMENTS 298 6.7 PROTECTING KNOW-HOW
301 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION 307 TABLEOF CASES 317 BIBLIOGRAPHY 330 INDEX
357 ANNEX I: UNFAIR COMMERCIAL PRACTICES DIRECTIVE 359 ANNEX II: WIPO
PROVISIONS ON PROTECTION AGAINST UNFAIR COMPETITION (1996) 377 XN |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Vrey, Rogier W. de |
author_facet | Vrey, Rogier W. de |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Vrey, Rogier W. de |
author_variant | r w d v rwd rwdv |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV021462793 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KJC2799 |
callnumber-raw | KJC2799 |
callnumber-search | KJC2799 |
callnumber-sort | KJC 42799 |
classification_rvk | PS 3760 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)62897666 (DE-599)BVBBV021462793 |
dewey-full | 343/.072 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 343 - Military, tax, trade & industrial law |
dewey-raw | 343/.072 |
dewey-search | 343/.072 |
dewey-sort | 3343 272 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Thesis Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01803nam a2200457 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021462793</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100722 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">060223s2006 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9004150404</subfield><subfield code="9">90-04-15040-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)62897666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021462793</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC2799</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">343/.072</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3760</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139788:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vrey, Rogier W. de</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Towards a European unfair competition law</subfield><subfield code="b">a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments</subfield><subfield code="c">by Rogier W. de Vrey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Leiden [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Nijhoff</subfield><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVII, 380 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intellectual property law library</subfield><subfield code="v">1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl.: Utrecht, Univ., Diss., 2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Concurrence déloyale</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Concurrence déloyale - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europees recht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Harmonisatie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mededingingsrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europarecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Competition, Unfair</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Competition, Unfair</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Intellectual property law library</subfield><subfield code="v">1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021525131</subfield><subfield code="9">1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014682712&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014682712</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
geographic | Europa |
geographic_facet | Europa |
id | DE-604.BV021462793 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T14:08:20Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:36:30Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9004150404 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014682712 |
oclc_num | 62897666 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-M382 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-20 DE-11 DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-20 DE-11 DE-188 |
physical | XVII, 380 S. |
publishDate | 2006 |
publishDateSearch | 2006 |
publishDateSort | 2006 |
publisher | Nijhoff |
record_format | marc |
series | Intellectual property law library |
series2 | Intellectual property law library |
spelling | Vrey, Rogier W. de Verfasser aut Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments by Rogier W. de Vrey Leiden [u.a.] Nijhoff 2006 XVII, 380 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Intellectual property law library 1 Zugl.: Utrecht, Univ., Diss., 2005 Concurrence déloyale Concurrence déloyale - Europe Europees recht gtt Harmonisatie gtt Mededingingsrecht gtt Europarecht Competition, Unfair Competition, Unfair Europe Europa (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Intellectual property law library 1 (DE-604)BV021525131 1 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014682712&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Vrey, Rogier W. de Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments Intellectual property law library Concurrence déloyale Concurrence déloyale - Europe Europees recht gtt Harmonisatie gtt Mededingingsrecht gtt Europarecht Competition, Unfair Competition, Unfair Europe |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments |
title_auth | Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments |
title_exact_search | Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments |
title_exact_search_txtP | Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments |
title_full | Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments by Rogier W. de Vrey |
title_fullStr | Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments by Rogier W. de Vrey |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards a European unfair competition law a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments by Rogier W. de Vrey |
title_short | Towards a European unfair competition law |
title_sort | towards a european unfair competition law a clash between legal families a comparative study of english german and dutch law in light of existing european and international legal instruments |
title_sub | a clash between legal families ; a comparative study of English, German and Dutch law in light of existing European and international legal instruments |
topic | Concurrence déloyale Concurrence déloyale - Europe Europees recht gtt Harmonisatie gtt Mededingingsrecht gtt Europarecht Competition, Unfair Competition, Unfair Europe |
topic_facet | Concurrence déloyale Concurrence déloyale - Europe Europees recht Harmonisatie Mededingingsrecht Europarecht Competition, Unfair Competition, Unfair Europe Europa Hochschulschrift |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014682712&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV021525131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vreyrogierwde towardsaeuropeanunfaircompetitionlawaclashbetweenlegalfamiliesacomparativestudyofenglishgermananddutchlawinlightofexistingeuropeanandinternationallegalinstruments |