Antitrust evidence handbook:
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Chicago, Ill.
American Bar Assoc., Section of Antitrust Law
2002
|
| Ausgabe: | 2. ed. |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XIII, 298 S. |
| ISBN: | 1590310357 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV021456981 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20050107 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 040726s2002 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 1590310357 |9 1-59031-035-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021456981 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Antitrust evidence handbook |
| 250 | |a 2. ed. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Chicago, Ill. |b American Bar Assoc., Section of Antitrust Law |c 2002 | |
| 300 | |a XIII, 298 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 710 | 2 | |a American Bar Association |b Section of Antitrust Law |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1000361-7 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014677080&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014677080 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804135179832262656 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK SECOND EDITION SECTION OF ANTITRUST LAW
DEFENDING LIBERTY PURSUING JUSTICE CONTENTS FOREWORD XI PREFACE XIII
CTAAPTER I HEARSAY ISSUES MOST RELEVANT IN ANTITRUST CASES 1 A.
COCONSPIRATOR STATEMENTS 5 1. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COCONSPIRATOR
EXCEPTION 5 2. COCONSPIRATOR STATEMENTS NOT HEARSAY 6 3. STANDARD
OFPROOF 7 4. ADMISSIBILITY IS A QUESTION OF LAW 7 5. ORDER OFPROOF 8 6.
FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE 10 7. ELEMENTS OF COCONSPIRATOR
STATEMENTS 11 B. 803(6) BUSINESS RECORDS 18 1. THERULE 18 2. ADMISSION
UNDER RULE 803(6) 18 3. BASIS OF THE EXCEPTION 18 4. SCOPE OF THE
EXCEPTION 19 5. APPLICATION OF EXCEPTION TO ANTITRUST CASES 19 C. 803(3)
STATE OF MIND 20 1. THERULE 20 2. REMEDIES WHERE COCONSPIRATOR
STATEMENTS WERE ERRONEOUSLY ADMITTED 22 3. OTHER BASES FOR ADMISSION 22
D. PUBLIC RECORDS, MARKET REPORTS, COMMERCIAL PUBLICATIONS, AND
TREATISES 23 1. PUBLIC RECORDS 23 2. MARKET REPORTS AND COMMERCIAL
PUBLICATIONS 26 3. LEARNED TREATISES 28 4. RELIANCE BY EXPERTS 28 E.
PRIOR STATEMENTS AND TESTIMONY OF A WITNESS 29 IN IV ANTITRUST EVIDENCE
HANDBOOK 1. ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMONY AND OTHER PRIOR STATEMENTS
OF A WITNESS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 801(D)(L) 29 2.
ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR STATEMENTS AS PAST RECOLLECTION RECORDED UNDER
FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 803(5) 39 3. ADMISSIBILITY AS FORMER TESTIMONY
UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 804(B)(L) 44 CHAPTER II RELEVANCE ISSUES
IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 55 A. OVERVIEW OF RELEVANCY 56 1. LIBERAL
POLICY 56 2. LIBERAL POLICY IN ANTITRUST CASES 56 B. EVIDENCE OF OTHER
UNLAWFUL CONDUCT 56 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLE 56 2. PLAINTIFF S ILLEGAL
CONDUCT MAY ALSO BE ADMISSIBLE 57 C. CAN JURY BE TOLD ABOUT TREBLING AND
AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES? 58 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLE 58 2. JURY NOT
INFORMED 58 3. JURY INFORMED 59 4. INSUFFICIENT GROUNDS FOR REVERSAL 59
5. IN LIMINE MOTION 59 D. INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE CONCERNING PRIOR
LITIGATION OR SETTLEMENTS WITH OTHER PARTIES 59 1. INTRODUCTION OF
EVIDENCE CONCERNING SIMILAR LITIGATION WITH THIRD PARTIES 59 2. PRIOR
SETTLEMENTS 60 E. SHARING AGREEMENTS 61 1. APPORTION LIABILITY 61 2.
DISCOVERY OF SHARING AGREEMENTS 61 3. VALIDITY OF SHARING AGREEMENTS 61
F. AGENCY DECISIONS 62 1. NOT HEARSAY 62 2. REQUIREMENTS OF RULE
803(8)(C) 62 3. ADMISSIBILITY PRESUMED 63 4. WEIGHT TO BE GIVEN AGENCY
DECISION 63 G. CONDUCT PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT 63 1. NOT BASIS FOR
ANTITRUST LIABILITY 63 CONTENTS 2. THE SHAM EXCEPTION 64 3. PROTECTED
CONDUCT ADMISSIBLE FOR OTHER PURPOSES 65 4. SPLIT OF AUTHORITY ON
ADMISSIBILITY 65 H. SALES OF PRODUCTS OUTSIDE THE RELEVANT MARKET 67 1.
PURPOSE OF EVIDENCE 67 2. EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE 67 3. EVIDENCE
INADMISSIBLE 67 I. DEFENDANT S CONDUCT OUTSIDE OF THE RELEVANT MARKET 68
1. EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE 68 2. EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE 68 3. EVIDENCE OF
PASS-ON 68 J. TIME LIMITATIONS AT TRIAL AND EXCLUSION OF CUMULATIVE
EVIDENCE 68 K. EXISTENCE OR NONEXI STENCE OF ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE
PROGRAM 69 1. INTENT AN ISSUE 69 2. EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS
ADMITTED TO PROVE LACK OF INTENT 69 3. EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS
EXCLUDED FROM PROVING LACK OF INTENT 70 L. PRECLUSION OF CLAIMS AND
DEFENSES 70 1. IN PARI DELICTO 70 2. UNCLEAN HANDS 74 M. POSTACQUISITION
EVIDENCE IN MERGER CASES 75 1. GENERAL RULE: POSTACQUISITION EVIDENCE
ACCEPTED 75 2. LIMITATIONS ON THE GENERAL RULE 77 N. PARALLEL CONDUCT AS
PROOF OF HORIZONTAL CONSPIRACY 77 1. NOT SUFFICIENT ALONE 77 2.
ADMISSIBLE BUT ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE REQUIRED 78 3. PLUS FACTORS
ENUNCIATED BY THE COURTS 79 O. DISTRIBUTOR COMPLAINTS 79 1. SUBSTANTIVE
STANDARDS 79 2. ISSUES IN DISTRIBUTOR LITIGATION 80 P. CONDUCT OUTSIDE
THE PERIOD OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 82 CHAPTER III PRIVILEGES 83 A.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 84 1. OVERVIEW OF THE
PRIVILEGE 84 2. SCOPE OF THE PRIVILEGE 84 VI ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK
3. COMMON INTEREST OR JOINT DEFENSE PRIVILEGE 92 4. EXCEPTIONS TO THE
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE PARTICULARLY APPLICABLE IN ANTITRUST CASES 95
B. ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 98 1.
OVERVIEW 98 2. ELEMENTS OFTHE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE 100 3. LIMITATIONS
ON THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE 108 4. EXCEPTIONS TO THE WORK PRODUCT
DOCTRINE 110 5. WAIVER OFTHE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE 113 C.
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 119 1. OVERVIEW
OFTHE PRIVILEGE 119 2. SCOPE OFTHE PRIVILEGE 120 D. GOVERNMENTAL
PRIVILEGES 120 1. GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS 120 2. ITEMS SUBJECT TO RULE
6(E) 121 3. MATTERS NOT SUBJECT TO RULE 6(E) 122 4. EVALUATION OF NEED
FOR CONTINUED SECRECY 123 5. EVALUATION OF NEED FOR DISCLOSURE 124 6.
BALANCING TEST 127 7. GOVERNMENT USE OF GRAND JURY INFORMATION IN CIVIL
CASES 127 8. DISCLOSURE OF PRESENTENCE MATERIALS UTILIZED IN A PRIOR
CRIMINALCASE 127 9. OTHER GOVERNMENTAL PRIVILEGES 128 E. OTHER
PRIVILEGES 129 1. PSYCHOTHERAPIST-PATIENT PRIVILEGE 129 2.
ACCOUNTANT-CLIENT PRIVILEGE 130 CHAPTER IV THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST
SELF-INCRIMINATION 131 A. WHEN MAY THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE BE
INVOKED? 132 1. TYPE OF PROCEEDING 132 2. STAGE OF PROCEEDING 132 B.
THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS*WHEN IS THE PRIVILEGE PROPERLY INVOKED? 133 1.
RISK OF STATE OR FEDERAL PROSECUTION 133 2. LINK IN THE CHAIN 134 3.
WITNESS BEARS BUERDEN 135 4. GUILT NOT NECESSARY 135 CONTENTS VII C. WHO
MAY INVOKE THE PRIVILEGE AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES? 136 1. NATURAL
PERSONS 136 2. BUSINESS RECORDS/REQUIRED RECORDS EXCEPTION 137 3.
PRIVATE DOCUMENTS V. CORPORATE DOCUMENTS 138 4. PRIVILEGE APPLIES ONLY
WHEN THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS TESTIMONIAL. 140 5. THREAT MUST BE
CRIMINAL PROSECUTION 140 6. PRIVILEGE PROTECTS ONLY AGAINST COMPELLED
SELF- INCRIMINATION 140 D. LIMITATIONS ON THE INVOCATION OFTHE PRIVILEGE
141 1. DOUBLE JEOPARDY 141 2. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 143 3. IMMUNITY 144
4. FOREIGN PROSECUTION 145 5. COURT MUST DETERMINE WHETHER THE WITNESS S
INVOCATION OFTHE PRIVILEGE IS JUSTIFIED 146 E. EFFECTS OF INVOKING THE
PRIVILEGE 147 1. CORPORATION CANNOT RELY ON PRIVILEGE OF EMPLOYEES 147
2. CORPORATE DISCOVERY RESPONSES 148 3. NO CORPORATE SANCTIONS AGAINST
EMPLOYEES 148 4. BLANKET ASSERTIONS INAPPROPRIATE 148 5. TREATED AS
DENIAL OF ALLEGATIONS BY DEFENDANT 149 6. INVOCATION BY PLAINTIFF 149 7.
PARTY WHO ASSERTS PRIVILEGE IN DISCOVERY MAY NOT TESTIFY AT TRIAL 149 8.
ADVERSE INFERENCES 150 F. WAIVER OFTHE PRIVILEGE 150 1. VOLUNTARY
DISCLOSURE 150 2. WAIVER LIMITED TO SAME PROCEEDING 150 3. SCOPE OF
WAIVER 151 G. COMPULSION OF TESTIMONY IN CIVIL CASES 151 1. FEDERAL
WITNESS IMMUNITY STATUTE, 18 U.S.C. §§ 6001 - 05(2000) 151 2.
APPLICATION OFTHE IMMUNITY STATUTE 152 H. USE OF OTHER EVIDENCE WHEN
FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE IS ASSERTED 154 1. USE OF PRIOR TRIAL OR
DEPOSITION TESTIMONY 154 2. USEOF GRAND JURY TESTIMONY 155 VIII
ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK 3. RELEASE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL 157 I.
ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM INVOCATION OF FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE 157 1.
NATURE OF PROCEEDING 157 2. RELEVANT FACTORS 159 CHAPTER V EXPERTS 163
A. ISSUES ON WHICH EXPERTS OFTEN TESTIFY IN ANTITRUST CASES 167 1.
ELEMENTS OF ANTITRUST LIABILITY 167 2. DEFENSES TO ANTITRUST CLAIMS 174
3. CASE-SPECIFIC ISSUES 175 4. ULTIMATE ISSUES 176 B. QUALIFICATION OF
WITNESS AS EXPERT 177 1. EXPERT REQUIREMENT 177 2. DISCRETION 178 C.
ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY 178 1. THE EFFECT OF DAUBERT ON THE
ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY 179 2. THE SCOPE OF DAUBERT 182 D.
SCOPE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 705 183 1.
PURPOSES OF RULE 705 183 2. BUERDEN OF CHALLENGING FOUNDATION FOR EXPERT
TESTIMONY 183 3. RULE 705 DOES NOT AFFECT DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS 183 4.
RULE 705 DOES NOT AFFECT SUBSTANTIVE USE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY 184 E.
COURT-APPOINTED EXPERTS 184 1. FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 706(A) PERMITS
COURT TO APPOINT EXPERTS 184 2. COMPENSATION 186 3. USE OF
COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT WITNESSES 186 F. TESTIFYING EXPERT WITNESSES:
DISCOVERY AND EVIDENTIARY ISSUES 187 1. REPORTS, OPINIONS, AND
UNDERLYING INFORMATION ARE DISCOVERABLE 187 2. COMPUTERIZED DATA OR
MODELS RELIED UPON BY EXPERTS ARE GENERALLY DISCOVERABLE 188 3. ROUTINE
DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERTS AUTHORIZED 188 CONTENTS IX 4. DISCOVERY OF WORK
PRODUCT USED TO PREPARE EXPERTS 189 G. NONTESTIFYING BUT FORMALLY
RETAINED EXPERTS: DISCOVERY AND EVIDENTIARY ISSUES 190 1. FACTS AND
OPINIONS NOT DISCOVERABLE EXCEPT ON SHOWING OF EXCEPTIONAL
CIRCUMSTANCES 190 2. DISCOVERY OF IDENTITY OF RETAINED, NONTESTIFYING
EXPERT 191 H. NONRETAINED EXPERTS: IDENTITY AND OPINIONS NOT
DISCOVERABLE 191 I. DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE 192 1. TYPESOF DEMONSTRATIVE
EVIDENCE 192 2. PRESENTATION OF DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE IN COMPLEX CASES
192 3. STANDARDS FOR ADMISSIBILITY 192 4. USE AT TRIAL 194 J. SUMMARY
EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 1006 195 1. SCOPE OF RULE 1006
195 2. CRITERIA 196 CHAPTER VI PRIMA FACIE EFFECT 199 A. GENERAL
PRINCIPLES 200 1. RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL COMPARED 200 2.
WHO IS BOUND? 200 3. OFFENSIVE V. DEFENSIVE COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL 200 4.
MUTUALITY 201 B. MUTUAL COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL 201 1. REQUIREMENTS 201 2.
APPEALS 203 3. EXCEPTIONS 203 4. NO PRECLUSIVE EFFECT FROM SETTLEMENTS
205 5. FINDINGS IN PRIOR CRIMINAL CASES 206 6. ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS
207 C. NONMUTUAL COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL 209 1. DEFINITION 209 2.
REQUIREMENTS 209 3. TRIAL COURT DISCRETION 210 D. SECTION 5(A) OFTHE
CLAYTON ACT (15 U.S.C. § 16(A)) 210 1. PRIMA FACIE EFFECT 210 2. SCOPE
OF PRIMA FACIE EFFECT 211 ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK 3. COLLATERAL
ESTOPPEL COMPARED 211 4. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIMA FACIE EFFECT UNDER
SECTION 5(A) 212 5. LIMITATIONS 213 6. EVIDENTIARY USE 214 7. PRIMA
FACIE EFFECT OF CRIMINAL CONVICTION 214 8. FTC FINDINGS 215 TABLEOF
AUTHORITIES 217
|
| adam_txt |
ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK SECOND EDITION SECTION OF ANTITRUST LAW
DEFENDING LIBERTY PURSUING JUSTICE CONTENTS FOREWORD XI PREFACE XIII
CTAAPTER I HEARSAY ISSUES MOST RELEVANT IN ANTITRUST CASES 1 A.
COCONSPIRATOR STATEMENTS 5 1. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE COCONSPIRATOR
EXCEPTION 5 2. COCONSPIRATOR STATEMENTS NOT HEARSAY 6 3. STANDARD
OFPROOF 7 4. ADMISSIBILITY IS A QUESTION OF LAW 7 5. ORDER OFPROOF 8 6.
FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT EVIDENCE 10 7. ELEMENTS OF COCONSPIRATOR
STATEMENTS 11 B. 803(6) BUSINESS RECORDS 18 1. THERULE 18 2. ADMISSION
UNDER RULE 803(6) 18 3. BASIS OF THE EXCEPTION 18 4. SCOPE OF THE
EXCEPTION 19 5. APPLICATION OF EXCEPTION TO ANTITRUST CASES 19 C. 803(3)
STATE OF MIND 20 1. THERULE 20 2. REMEDIES WHERE COCONSPIRATOR
STATEMENTS WERE ERRONEOUSLY ADMITTED 22 3. OTHER BASES FOR ADMISSION 22
D. PUBLIC RECORDS, MARKET REPORTS, COMMERCIAL PUBLICATIONS, AND
TREATISES 23 1. PUBLIC RECORDS 23 2. MARKET REPORTS AND COMMERCIAL
PUBLICATIONS 26 3. LEARNED TREATISES 28 4. RELIANCE BY EXPERTS 28 E.
PRIOR STATEMENTS AND TESTIMONY OF A WITNESS 29 IN IV ANTITRUST EVIDENCE
HANDBOOK 1. ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR TESTIMONY AND OTHER PRIOR STATEMENTS
OF A WITNESS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 801(D)(L) 29 2.
ADMISSIBILITY OF PRIOR STATEMENTS AS PAST RECOLLECTION RECORDED UNDER
FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 803(5) 39 3. ADMISSIBILITY AS FORMER TESTIMONY
UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 804(B)(L) 44 CHAPTER II RELEVANCE ISSUES
IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 55 A. OVERVIEW OF RELEVANCY 56 1. LIBERAL
POLICY 56 2. LIBERAL POLICY IN ANTITRUST CASES 56 B. EVIDENCE OF OTHER
UNLAWFUL CONDUCT 56 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLE 56 2. PLAINTIFF S ILLEGAL
CONDUCT MAY ALSO BE ADMISSIBLE 57 C. CAN JURY BE TOLD ABOUT TREBLING AND
AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES? 58 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLE 58 2. JURY NOT
INFORMED 58 3. JURY INFORMED 59 4. INSUFFICIENT GROUNDS FOR REVERSAL 59
5. IN LIMINE MOTION 59 D. INTRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE CONCERNING PRIOR
LITIGATION OR SETTLEMENTS WITH OTHER PARTIES 59 1. INTRODUCTION OF
EVIDENCE CONCERNING SIMILAR LITIGATION WITH THIRD PARTIES 59 2. PRIOR
SETTLEMENTS 60 E. SHARING AGREEMENTS 61 1. APPORTION LIABILITY 61 2.
DISCOVERY OF SHARING AGREEMENTS 61 3. VALIDITY OF SHARING AGREEMENTS 61
F. AGENCY DECISIONS 62 1. NOT HEARSAY 62 2. REQUIREMENTS OF RULE
803(8)(C) 62 3. ADMISSIBILITY PRESUMED 63 4. WEIGHT TO BE GIVEN AGENCY
DECISION 63 G. CONDUCT PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT 63 1. NOT BASIS FOR
ANTITRUST LIABILITY 63 CONTENTS 2. THE SHAM EXCEPTION 64 3. PROTECTED
CONDUCT ADMISSIBLE FOR OTHER PURPOSES 65 4. SPLIT OF AUTHORITY ON
ADMISSIBILITY 65 H. SALES OF PRODUCTS OUTSIDE THE RELEVANT MARKET 67 1.
PURPOSE OF EVIDENCE 67 2. EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE 67 3. EVIDENCE
INADMISSIBLE 67 I. DEFENDANT'S CONDUCT OUTSIDE OF THE RELEVANT MARKET 68
1. EVIDENCE ADMISSIBLE 68 2. EVIDENCE INADMISSIBLE 68 3. EVIDENCE OF
PASS-ON 68 J. TIME LIMITATIONS AT TRIAL AND EXCLUSION OF CUMULATIVE
EVIDENCE 68 K. EXISTENCE OR NONEXI STENCE OF ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE
PROGRAM 69 1. INTENT AN ISSUE 69 2. EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS
ADMITTED TO PROVE LACK OF INTENT 69 3. EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS
EXCLUDED FROM PROVING LACK OF INTENT 70 L. PRECLUSION OF CLAIMS AND
DEFENSES 70 1. IN PARI DELICTO 70 2. UNCLEAN HANDS 74 M. POSTACQUISITION
EVIDENCE IN MERGER CASES 75 1. GENERAL RULE: POSTACQUISITION EVIDENCE
ACCEPTED 75 2. LIMITATIONS ON THE GENERAL RULE 77 N. PARALLEL CONDUCT AS
PROOF OF HORIZONTAL CONSPIRACY 77 1. NOT SUFFICIENT ALONE 77 2.
ADMISSIBLE BUT ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE REQUIRED 78 3. "PLUS FACTORS"
ENUNCIATED BY THE COURTS 79 O. DISTRIBUTOR COMPLAINTS 79 1. SUBSTANTIVE
STANDARDS 79 2. ISSUES IN DISTRIBUTOR LITIGATION 80 P. CONDUCT OUTSIDE
THE PERIOD OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 82 CHAPTER III PRIVILEGES 83 A.
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 84 1. OVERVIEW OF THE
PRIVILEGE 84 2. SCOPE OF THE PRIVILEGE 84 VI ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK
3. COMMON INTEREST OR JOINT DEFENSE PRIVILEGE 92 4. EXCEPTIONS TO THE
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE PARTICULARLY APPLICABLE IN ANTITRUST CASES 95
B. ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 98 1.
OVERVIEW 98 2. ELEMENTS OFTHE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE 100 3. LIMITATIONS
ON THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE 108 4. EXCEPTIONS TO THE WORK PRODUCT
DOCTRINE 110 5. WAIVER OFTHE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE 113 C.
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT PRIVILEGE IN THE ANTITRUST CONTEXT 119 1. OVERVIEW
OFTHE PRIVILEGE 119 2. SCOPE OFTHE PRIVILEGE 120 D. GOVERNMENTAL
PRIVILEGES 120 1. GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS 120 2. ITEMS SUBJECT TO RULE
6(E) 121 3. MATTERS NOT SUBJECT TO RULE 6(E) 122 4. EVALUATION OF NEED
FOR CONTINUED SECRECY 123 5. EVALUATION OF NEED FOR DISCLOSURE 124 6.
BALANCING TEST 127 7. GOVERNMENT USE OF GRAND JURY INFORMATION IN CIVIL
CASES 127 8. DISCLOSURE OF PRESENTENCE MATERIALS UTILIZED IN A PRIOR
CRIMINALCASE 127 9. OTHER GOVERNMENTAL PRIVILEGES 128 E. OTHER
PRIVILEGES 129 1. PSYCHOTHERAPIST-PATIENT PRIVILEGE 129 2.
ACCOUNTANT-CLIENT PRIVILEGE 130 CHAPTER IV THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST
SELF-INCRIMINATION 131 A. WHEN MAY THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE BE
INVOKED? 132 1. TYPE OF PROCEEDING 132 2. STAGE OF PROCEEDING 132 B.
THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS*WHEN IS THE PRIVILEGE PROPERLY INVOKED? 133 1.
RISK OF STATE OR FEDERAL PROSECUTION 133 2. "LINK IN THE CHAIN" 134 3.
WITNESS BEARS BUERDEN 135 4. GUILT NOT NECESSARY 135 CONTENTS VII C. WHO
MAY INVOKE THE PRIVILEGE AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES? 136 1. NATURAL
PERSONS 136 2. BUSINESS RECORDS/REQUIRED RECORDS EXCEPTION 137 3.
PRIVATE DOCUMENTS V. CORPORATE DOCUMENTS 138 4. PRIVILEGE APPLIES ONLY
WHEN THE ACTIVITY INVOLVED IS "TESTIMONIAL." 140 5. THREAT MUST BE
CRIMINAL PROSECUTION 140 6. PRIVILEGE PROTECTS ONLY AGAINST COMPELLED
SELF- INCRIMINATION 140 D. LIMITATIONS ON THE INVOCATION OFTHE PRIVILEGE
141 1. DOUBLE JEOPARDY 141 2. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 143 3. IMMUNITY 144
4. FOREIGN PROSECUTION 145 5. COURT MUST DETERMINE WHETHER THE WITNESS'S
INVOCATION OFTHE PRIVILEGE IS JUSTIFIED 146 E. EFFECTS OF INVOKING THE
PRIVILEGE 147 1. CORPORATION CANNOT RELY ON PRIVILEGE OF EMPLOYEES 147
2. CORPORATE DISCOVERY RESPONSES 148 3. NO CORPORATE SANCTIONS AGAINST
EMPLOYEES 148 4. BLANKET ASSERTIONS INAPPROPRIATE 148 5. TREATED AS
DENIAL OF ALLEGATIONS BY DEFENDANT 149 6. INVOCATION BY PLAINTIFF 149 7.
PARTY WHO ASSERTS PRIVILEGE IN DISCOVERY MAY NOT TESTIFY AT TRIAL 149 8.
ADVERSE INFERENCES 150 F. WAIVER OFTHE PRIVILEGE 150 1. VOLUNTARY
DISCLOSURE 150 2. WAIVER LIMITED TO SAME PROCEEDING 150 3. SCOPE OF
WAIVER 151 G. COMPULSION OF TESTIMONY IN CIVIL CASES 151 1. FEDERAL
WITNESS IMMUNITY STATUTE, 18 U.S.C. §§ 6001 - 05(2000) 151 2.
APPLICATION OFTHE IMMUNITY STATUTE 152 H. USE OF OTHER EVIDENCE WHEN
FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE IS ASSERTED 154 1. USE OF PRIOR TRIAL OR
DEPOSITION TESTIMONY 154 2. USEOF GRAND JURY TESTIMONY 155 VIII
ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK 3. RELEASE OF GRAND JURY MATERIAL 157 I.
ADVERSE INFERENCES FROM INVOCATION OF FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE 157 1.
NATURE OF PROCEEDING 157 2. RELEVANT FACTORS 159 CHAPTER V EXPERTS 163
A. ISSUES ON WHICH EXPERTS OFTEN TESTIFY IN ANTITRUST CASES 167 1.
ELEMENTS OF ANTITRUST LIABILITY 167 2. DEFENSES TO ANTITRUST CLAIMS 174
3. CASE-SPECIFIC ISSUES 175 4. ULTIMATE ISSUES 176 B. QUALIFICATION OF
WITNESS AS EXPERT 177 1. EXPERT REQUIREMENT 177 2. DISCRETION 178 C.
ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY 178 1. THE EFFECT OF DAUBERT ON THE
ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT TESTIMONY 179 2. THE SCOPE OF DAUBERT 182 D.
SCOPE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 705 183 1.
PURPOSES OF RULE 705 183 2. BUERDEN OF CHALLENGING FOUNDATION FOR EXPERT
TESTIMONY 183 3. RULE 705 DOES NOT AFFECT DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS 183 4.
RULE 705 DOES NOT AFFECT SUBSTANTIVE USE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY 184 E.
COURT-APPOINTED EXPERTS 184 1. FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 706(A) PERMITS
COURT TO APPOINT EXPERTS 184 2. COMPENSATION 186 3. USE OF
COURT-APPOINTED EXPERT WITNESSES 186 F. TESTIFYING EXPERT WITNESSES:
DISCOVERY AND EVIDENTIARY ISSUES 187 1. REPORTS, OPINIONS, AND
UNDERLYING INFORMATION ARE DISCOVERABLE 187 2. COMPUTERIZED DATA OR
MODELS RELIED UPON BY EXPERTS ARE GENERALLY DISCOVERABLE 188 3. ROUTINE
DEPOSITIONS OF EXPERTS AUTHORIZED 188 CONTENTS IX 4. DISCOVERY OF WORK
PRODUCT USED TO PREPARE EXPERTS 189 G. NONTESTIFYING BUT FORMALLY
RETAINED EXPERTS: DISCOVERY AND EVIDENTIARY ISSUES 190 1. FACTS AND
OPINIONS NOT DISCOVERABLE EXCEPT ON SHOWING OF "EXCEPTIONAL
CIRCUMSTANCES" 190 2. DISCOVERY OF IDENTITY OF RETAINED, NONTESTIFYING
EXPERT 191 H. NONRETAINED EXPERTS: IDENTITY AND OPINIONS NOT
DISCOVERABLE 191 I. DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE 192 1. TYPESOF DEMONSTRATIVE
EVIDENCE 192 2. PRESENTATION OF DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE IN COMPLEX CASES
192 3. STANDARDS FOR ADMISSIBILITY 192 4. USE AT TRIAL 194 J. SUMMARY
EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 1006 195 1. SCOPE OF RULE 1006
195 2. CRITERIA 196 CHAPTER VI PRIMA FACIE EFFECT 199 A. GENERAL
PRINCIPLES 200 1. RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL COMPARED 200 2.
WHO IS BOUND? 200 3. OFFENSIVE V. DEFENSIVE COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL 200 4.
MUTUALITY 201 B. MUTUAL COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL 201 1. REQUIREMENTS 201 2.
APPEALS 203 3. EXCEPTIONS 203 4. NO PRECLUSIVE EFFECT FROM SETTLEMENTS
205 5. FINDINGS IN PRIOR CRIMINAL CASES 206 6. ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS
207 C. NONMUTUAL COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL 209 1. DEFINITION 209 2.
REQUIREMENTS 209 3. TRIAL COURT DISCRETION 210 D. SECTION 5(A) OFTHE
CLAYTON ACT (15 U.S.C. § 16(A)) 210 1. PRIMA FACIE EFFECT 210 2. SCOPE
OF PRIMA FACIE EFFECT 211 ANTITRUST EVIDENCE HANDBOOK 3. COLLATERAL
ESTOPPEL COMPARED 211 4. REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIMA FACIE EFFECT UNDER
SECTION 5(A) 212 5. LIMITATIONS 213 6. EVIDENTIARY USE 214 7. PRIMA
FACIE EFFECT OF CRIMINAL CONVICTION 214 8. FTC FINDINGS 215 TABLEOF
AUTHORITIES 217 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV021456981 |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV021456981 |
| edition | 2. ed. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00994nam a2200265 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021456981</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20050107 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">040726s2002 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1590310357</subfield><subfield code="9">1-59031-035-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021456981</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antitrust evidence handbook</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2. ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Chicago, Ill.</subfield><subfield code="b">American Bar Assoc., Section of Antitrust Law</subfield><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIII, 298 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">American Bar Association</subfield><subfield code="b">Section of Antitrust Law</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1000361-7</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014677080&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014677080</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV021456981 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T14:06:33Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:36:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)1000361-7 |
| isbn | 1590310357 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014677080 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 |
| physical | XIII, 298 S. |
| publishDate | 2002 |
| publishDateSearch | 2002 |
| publishDateSort | 2002 |
| publisher | American Bar Assoc., Section of Antitrust Law |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Antitrust evidence handbook 2. ed. Chicago, Ill. American Bar Assoc., Section of Antitrust Law 2002 XIII, 298 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law Sonstige (DE-588)1000361-7 oth GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014677080&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_auth | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_exact_search | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_full | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_fullStr | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_full_unstemmed | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_short | Antitrust evidence handbook |
| title_sort | antitrust evidence handbook |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014677080&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT americanbarassociationsectionofantitrustlaw antitrustevidencehandbook |