The making of European private law: toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Antwerp [u.a.]
Intersentia
2002
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Abstract Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XV, 306 S. |
ISBN: | 9050951910 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV021456105 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20170613 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 010918s2002 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9050951910 |9 90-5095-191-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)59182347 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021456105 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-20 |a DE-11 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KJC985 | |
082 | 0 | |a 346.4 |2 22 | |
084 | |a PS 3720 |0 (DE-625)139784: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Smits, Jan M. |d 1967- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)142870498 |4 aut | |
240 | 1 | 0 | |a Europees Privaatrecht in wording |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The making of European private law |b toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system |c Jan Smits |
264 | 1 | |a Antwerp [u.a.] |b Intersentia |c 2002 | |
300 | |a XV, 306 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
650 | 4 | |a Civil law |z Europe | |
650 | 4 | |a Law |z Europe |x International unification | |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
856 | 4 | |u http://www.bsz-bw.de/depot/metainf/9400000/9457000/9457422t.html |3 Abstract | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014676225&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014676225 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804135178501619712 |
---|---|
adam_text | THE MAKING OF EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW TOWARD A IUS COMMUNE EUROPAEUM AS A
MIXED LEGAL SYSTEM JAN SMITS TRANSLATED BY NICOLE KORNET INTERSENTIA
ANTWERP - OXFORD - NEW YORK TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE V TABLE OF
CONTENTS VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XIII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 § 1.
INTRODUCTION 1 § 2. WHY DEVELOP A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW? 2 § 3. THE ROADS
TOWARD A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW: CENTRALIST METHODS 6 A. INTRODUCTION 6 B.
INTERVENTION BY THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ISSUES OF COMPETENCE 7 1. PRIMARY
COMMUNITY LAW 9 2. SECONDARY COMMUNITY LAW 10 C. UNIFICATION THROUGH
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES 15 D. A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW THROUGH THE
JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE 19 E. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS . 22 1. FAMILY LAW 22 2. PROCEDURAL LAW
23 3. PROPERTY LAW 24 4. LAW OF CONTRACT 26 F. CENTRALIST METHODS: AN
EVALUATION 28 § 4. OBJECTIONS TO CENTRALIST METHODS; A EUROPEAN CIVIL
CODE? . . 28 A. INTRODUCTION 28 B. THE IDEA OF A BINDING CODIFICATION
SEEMS TO BE CONTRARY TO THE SPIRIT OF THE TIMES 29 C. AN IMPOSED
CODIFICATION OF RULES DOES NOT CREATE UNIFORM LAW 30 D. AN IMPOSED CIVIL
CODE NEGLECTS THE CULTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COUNTRIES 31 E.
ANTICIPATING SPECIFIC NATIONAL PROBLEMS WILL BECOME MORE DIFFICULT 32 F.
THE MAKING OF A EUROPEAN CIVIL CODE CREATES MORE THAN IS NECESSARY
CONSIDERING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 32 § 5. ASSESSMENT OF
THE OBJECTIONS 33 INTERSENTIA VLL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 2
NON-CENTRALIST METHODS TOWARDS AIUS COMMUNE . . 35 § 1. INTRODUCTION 35
§ 2. PRINCIPLES AS THE PRECURSORS TO A EUROPEAN CIVIL CODE: SOFT LAW AS
A MODEL 35 A. INTRODUCTION 35 B. THE PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW
37 C. THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS 39 §
3. LEGAL SCIENCE AND LEGAL EDUCATION 42 A. INTRODUCTION 42 B. DRAWING
INSPIRATION FROM A FORMER IUS COMMUNE? A DISCUSSION 43 C. A EUROPEAN
LEGAL SCIENCE? 45 D. EUROPEAN LEGAL EDUCATION? 54 § 4. THE LEX
MERCATORIA 57 § 5. RECEPTION OF LAW: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 59 A. GENERAL
59 B. LAW AND ECONOMICS 61 C. EIGHT POSSIBLE OBJECTIONS TO THE FREE
MOVEMENT OF LEGAL RULES 66 D. EVALUATION 70 CHAPTER 3 CIVIL LAW AND
COMMON LAW: THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURES 73 § 1. INTRODUCTION 73 § 2.
CIVIL LAW AND COMMON LAW: THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURES 74 A.
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF THE CIVIL LAW TRADITION 75 1. A BASIS IN
ROMAN LAW 75 2. CODIFICATION 77 3. SYSTEMATISATION AND THE PROGRAMMATIC
DESIRE THEREOF .... 79 4. LEGAL REASONING BASED ON SYLLOGISM 82 5. NO
BINDING PRECEDENT 82 6. THE PREVAILING MENTALITY, INCLUDINGJUDICIAL
STYLE 83 7. INSTITUTIONS 84 B. DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF THE COMMON LAW
TRADITION .... 84 1. NO BASIS IN ROMAN LAW, INSTEAD ENGLISH CUSTOMARY
LAW ... 84 2. NO CODIFICATION, BUT CASE LAW 86 3. THE ABSENCE OF
SYSTEMATISATION, OR A DESIRE THEREOF 88 4. REASONING FROM CASE TO CASE
90 5. BINDING PRECEDENT 91 VLLL INTERSENTIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 6. THE
PREVAILING MENTALITY, INCLUDING JUDICIAL STYLE 92 7. INSTITUTIONS 94 §
3. ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPARISON 94 § 4. IS THERE STILL A DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN THE CIVIL LAW AND THE COMMON LAW? 103 CHAPTER 4 MIXED LEGAL
SYSTEMS: THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 107 § 1. INTRODUCTION 107 § 2.
MIXED LEGAL SYSTEMS FROM A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE 108 § 3.
MANIFESTATIONS: MIXED LEGAL SYSTEMS OF THE WORLD 110 A. GROUP A: THE
CIVIL LAW COMPONENT DOES NOT COMPRISE ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 111 1. SCOTLAND
111 2. THE CANADIAN PROVINCE OF QUEBEC 114 3. THE AMERICAN STATE OF
LOUISIANA 119 4. THE REPUBLIC OF ISRAEL 121 B. GROUP B: THE CIVIL LAW
COMPONENT COMPRISES (FURTHER DEVELOPED) ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 125 C. GROUP BL:
THE MIX STILL EXISTS 125 1. THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 125 2. THE
REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE 134 3. THE REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA 135 4. THE KINGDOM
OF LESOTHO 135 5. THE KINGDOM OF SWAZILAND 136 6. THE REPUBLIC OF
NAMIBIA 136 7. THE REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA 137 8. THE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA
139 D. GROUP B2: THE MIX NO LONGER EXISTS 139 1. INDONESIA 140 2. NORTH
AMERICA: NEW HOLLAND 142 3. SURINAME (DUTCH GUYANA) AND THE NETHERLANDS
ANTILLES (ARUBA, BONAIRE, CURACAO, ST. MAARTEN, SABA AND ST. EUSTATIUS)
142 § 4. SOME CONCLUSIONS 144 A. GENERAL 144 B. INSIGHTS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW .... 148 INTERSENTIA TABLE OF
CONTENTS CHAPTER 5 ANGLICISED ROMAN-DUTCH LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA: CONTENT
AND METHOD 151 § 1. INTRODUCTION 151 § 2. THE ROMAN-DUTCH LAW OF THE
DUTCH REPUBLIC 151 A. INTRODUCTION 151 B. THE CONTENT OF ROMAN-DUTCH LAW
153 1. CUSTOMARY LAW 153 2. LOCAL LAWS 154 3. LEGISLATION 154 4.
COLLECTIONS OF CASE LAW 154 5. OPINIONS OF LEGAL SCHOLARS 155 6.
MONOGRAPHS 155 7. ROMAN LAW 157 C. THE METHOD OF ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 158 §
3. THE ANGLICISATION OF ROMAN-DUTCH LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA . . 161 A.
INTRODUCTION 161 B. ANGLICISATION: 1820-1910 162 C. A RETURN TO
ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 165 § 4. ANGLICISED ROMAN-DUTCH LAW TODAY 174 § 5.
CONTENT AND METHOD FOR A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW 184 CHAPTER 6 THE LAW OF
CONTRACT 187 § 1. INTRODUCTION 187 § 2. GOOD FAITH 189 A. GENERAL 189 B.
GOOD FAITH AND THE CIVIL LAW 190 C. GOOD FAITH AND THE COMMON LAW 193 D.
GOOD FAITH IN SOUTH AFRICAN PRIVATE LAW 195 E. A EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW?
198 § 3. FORMATION OF CONTRACT: CAUSA OR CONSIDERATION 201 A.
INTRODUCTION 201 B. CIVIL LAW: CAUSA 202 C. COMMON LAW. CONSIDERATION
203 D. FORMATION IN SOUTH AFRICA: NO CONSIDERATION 205 E. EUROPEAN
CONTRACT LAW? 207 § 4. FORMATION OF CONTRACT: THE DESPATCH AND ARRIVAL
THEORIES 208 A. INTRODUCTION 208 B. CIVIL LAW: DUTCH, FRENCH AND GERMAN
LAW 209 C. COMMON LAW: ENGLISH LAW 210 D. SOUTH AFRICAN LAW 211 E.
EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW? 212 X INTERSENTIA TABLE OF CONTENTS § 5. REMEDIES
FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT 213 A. INTRODUCTION 213 B. CIVIL LAW 214 1.
TERMINATION 214 2. DAMAGES 215 3. PERFORMANCE 217 C. COMMON LAW 218 1.
TERMINATION 218 2. DAMAGES 219 3. PERFORMANCE 219 D. REMEDIES IN SOUTH
AFRICA 221 1. TERMINATION 221 2. DAMAGES 222 3. PERFORMANCE 222 E. A
EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW OF REMEDIES? 223 1. TERMINATION 224 2. DAMAGES 225
3. PERFORMANCE 226 § 6. TOWARDS A MIXED LAW OF CONTRACT 227 CHAPTER 7
TORT LAW 229 § 1. INTRODUCTION 229 § 2. THE APPROACH OF FRENCH AND DUTCH
LAW 230 § 3. THE APPROACH OF GERMAN LAW 232 § 4. THE APPROACH OF ENGLISH
LAW 234 § 5. SOUTH AFRICAN TORT LAW 238 § 6. A EUROPEAN LAW OF TORT? 242
CHAPTER 8 THE LAW OF PROPERTY 245 § 1. INTRODUCTION 245 A. A MINIMAL
LEVEL OF UNIFORMITY 245 B. EUROPEAN AND PRIVATE INITIATIVES 246 § 2.
PROLEGOMENA FOR A EUROPEAN PROPERTY LAW: THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
PROPERTY LAW AND THE LAW OF OBLIGATIONS 249 A. INTRODUCTION 249 B. THE
NUMERUS CLAUSUS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE CIVIL LAW . 249 C. THE DEFECTS
OF THE PREVAILING CIVIL LAW THEORY AND THE ALTERNATIVE COMMON LAW
APPROACH 252 § 3. WHEN IS THERE A PROPERTY RIGHT AND WHEN IS THERE A
PERSONAL RIGHT? 254 INTERSENTIA XI TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION 254
B. LOOKING FOR CRITERIA IN THE CIVIL LAW AND IN THE COMMON LAW 254 C.
SOUTH AFRICAN LAW 257 D. EUROPEAN CRITERIA? 260 § 4. THE TRUST IN THE
CIVIL LAW? 262 A. INTRODUCTION 262 B. THE TRUST RELATIONSHIP 263 C. THE
TRUST IN SOUTH AFRICA 266 D. A EUROPEAN TRUST? 268 § 5. TOWARDS A MIXED
LAW OF PROPERTY 269 EPILOGUE TOWARDS A EUROPEAN LEGAL MENTALITY? 271 A.
AN ECLECTIC VIEW OF THE LAW 271 B. A SEARCH FOR THE OPTIMAL MIX OF
UNIFORMITY AND LEGAL CULTURE 272 BIBLIOGRAPHY 275 TABLE OF CASES 295
INDEX 299 INTERSENTIA
|
adam_txt |
THE MAKING OF EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW TOWARD A IUS COMMUNE EUROPAEUM AS A
MIXED LEGAL SYSTEM JAN SMITS TRANSLATED BY NICOLE KORNET INTERSENTIA
ANTWERP - OXFORD - NEW YORK TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE V TABLE OF
CONTENTS VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XIII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 § 1.
INTRODUCTION 1 § 2. WHY DEVELOP A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW? 2 § 3. THE ROADS
TOWARD A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW: CENTRALIST METHODS 6 A. INTRODUCTION 6 B.
INTERVENTION BY THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ISSUES OF COMPETENCE 7 1. PRIMARY
COMMUNITY LAW 9 2. SECONDARY COMMUNITY LAW 10 C. UNIFICATION THROUGH
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES 15 D. A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW THROUGH THE
JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE 19 E. THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS . 22 1. FAMILY LAW 22 2. PROCEDURAL LAW
23 3. PROPERTY LAW 24 4. LAW OF CONTRACT 26 F. CENTRALIST METHODS: AN
EVALUATION 28 § 4. OBJECTIONS TO CENTRALIST METHODS; A EUROPEAN CIVIL
CODE? . . 28 A. INTRODUCTION 28 B. THE IDEA OF A BINDING CODIFICATION
SEEMS TO BE CONTRARY TO THE SPIRIT OF THE TIMES 29 C. AN IMPOSED
CODIFICATION OF RULES DOES NOT CREATE UNIFORM LAW 30 D. AN IMPOSED CIVIL
CODE NEGLECTS THE CULTURAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN COUNTRIES 31 E.
ANTICIPATING SPECIFIC NATIONAL PROBLEMS WILL BECOME MORE DIFFICULT 32 F.
THE MAKING OF A EUROPEAN CIVIL CODE CREATES MORE THAN IS NECESSARY
CONSIDERING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 32 § 5. ASSESSMENT OF
THE OBJECTIONS 33 INTERSENTIA VLL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 2
NON-CENTRALIST METHODS TOWARDS AIUS COMMUNE . . 35 § 1. INTRODUCTION 35
§ 2. PRINCIPLES AS THE PRECURSORS TO A EUROPEAN CIVIL CODE: SOFT LAW AS
A MODEL 35 A. INTRODUCTION 35 B. THE PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW
37 C. THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS 39 §
3. LEGAL SCIENCE AND LEGAL EDUCATION 42 A. INTRODUCTION 42 B. DRAWING
INSPIRATION FROM A FORMER IUS COMMUNE? A DISCUSSION 43 C. A EUROPEAN
LEGAL SCIENCE? 45 D. EUROPEAN LEGAL EDUCATION? 54 § 4. THE LEX
MERCATORIA 57 § 5. RECEPTION OF LAW: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS 59 A. GENERAL
59 B. LAW AND ECONOMICS 61 C. EIGHT POSSIBLE OBJECTIONS TO THE FREE
MOVEMENT OF LEGAL RULES 66 D. EVALUATION 70 CHAPTER 3 CIVIL LAW AND
COMMON LAW: THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURES 73 § 1. INTRODUCTION 73 § 2.
CIVIL LAW AND COMMON LAW: THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURES 74 A.
DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF THE CIVIL LAW TRADITION 75 1. A BASIS IN
ROMAN LAW 75 2. CODIFICATION 77 3. SYSTEMATISATION AND THE PROGRAMMATIC
DESIRE THEREOF . 79 4. LEGAL REASONING BASED ON SYLLOGISM 82 5. NO
BINDING PRECEDENT 82 6. THE PREVAILING MENTALITY, INCLUDINGJUDICIAL
STYLE 83 7. INSTITUTIONS 84 B. DISTINGUISHING FEATURES OF THE COMMON LAW
TRADITION . 84 1. NO BASIS IN ROMAN LAW, INSTEAD ENGLISH CUSTOMARY
LAW . 84 2. NO CODIFICATION, BUT CASE LAW 86 3. THE ABSENCE OF
SYSTEMATISATION, OR A DESIRE THEREOF 88 4. REASONING FROM CASE TO CASE
90 5. BINDING PRECEDENT 91 VLLL INTERSENTIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 6. THE
PREVAILING MENTALITY, INCLUDING JUDICIAL STYLE 92 7. INSTITUTIONS 94 §
3. ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPARISON 94 § 4. IS THERE STILL A DIFFERENCE
BETWEEN THE CIVIL LAW AND THE COMMON LAW? 103 CHAPTER 4 MIXED LEGAL
SYSTEMS: THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 107 § 1. INTRODUCTION 107 § 2.
MIXED LEGAL SYSTEMS FROM A THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE 108 § 3.
MANIFESTATIONS: MIXED LEGAL SYSTEMS OF THE WORLD 110 A. GROUP A: THE
CIVIL LAW COMPONENT DOES NOT COMPRISE ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 111 1. SCOTLAND
111 2. THE CANADIAN PROVINCE OF QUEBEC 114 3. THE AMERICAN STATE OF
LOUISIANA 119 4. THE REPUBLIC OF ISRAEL 121 B. GROUP B: THE CIVIL LAW
COMPONENT COMPRISES (FURTHER DEVELOPED) ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 125 C. GROUP BL:
THE MIX STILL EXISTS 125 1. THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 125 2. THE
REPUBLIC OF ZIMBABWE 134 3. THE REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA 135 4. THE KINGDOM
OF LESOTHO 135 5. THE KINGDOM OF SWAZILAND 136 6. THE REPUBLIC OF
NAMIBIA 136 7. THE REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA 137 8. THE REPUBLIC OF GUYANA
139 D. GROUP B2: THE MIX NO LONGER EXISTS 139 1. INDONESIA 140 2. NORTH
AMERICA: NEW HOLLAND 142 3. SURINAME (DUTCH GUYANA) AND THE NETHERLANDS
ANTILLES (ARUBA, BONAIRE, CURACAO, ST. MAARTEN, SABA AND ST. EUSTATIUS)
142 § 4. SOME CONCLUSIONS 144 A. GENERAL 144 B. INSIGHTS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW . 148 INTERSENTIA TABLE OF
CONTENTS CHAPTER 5 ANGLICISED ROMAN-DUTCH LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA: CONTENT
AND METHOD 151 § 1. INTRODUCTION 151 § 2. THE ROMAN-DUTCH LAW OF THE
DUTCH REPUBLIC 151 A. INTRODUCTION 151 B. THE CONTENT OF ROMAN-DUTCH LAW
153 1. CUSTOMARY LAW 153 2. LOCAL LAWS 154 3. LEGISLATION 154 4.
COLLECTIONS OF CASE LAW 154 5. OPINIONS OF LEGAL SCHOLARS 155 6.
MONOGRAPHS 155 7. ROMAN LAW 157 C. THE METHOD OF ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 158 §
3. THE ANGLICISATION OF ROMAN-DUTCH LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA . . 161 A.
INTRODUCTION 161 B. ANGLICISATION: 1820-1910 162 C. A RETURN TO
ROMAN-DUTCH LAW 165 § 4. ANGLICISED ROMAN-DUTCH LAW TODAY 174 § 5.
CONTENT AND METHOD FOR A EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW 184 CHAPTER 6 THE LAW OF
CONTRACT 187 § 1. INTRODUCTION 187 § 2. GOOD FAITH 189 A. GENERAL 189 B.
GOOD FAITH AND THE CIVIL LAW 190 C. GOOD FAITH AND THE COMMON LAW 193 D.
GOOD FAITH IN SOUTH AFRICAN PRIVATE LAW 195 E. A EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW?
198 § 3. FORMATION OF CONTRACT: CAUSA OR CONSIDERATION 201 A.
INTRODUCTION 201 B. CIVIL LAW: CAUSA 202 C. COMMON LAW. CONSIDERATION
203 D. FORMATION IN SOUTH AFRICA: NO CONSIDERATION 205 E. EUROPEAN
CONTRACT LAW? 207 § 4. FORMATION OF CONTRACT: THE DESPATCH AND ARRIVAL
THEORIES 208 A. INTRODUCTION 208 B. CIVIL LAW: DUTCH, FRENCH AND GERMAN
LAW 209 C. COMMON LAW: ENGLISH LAW 210 D. SOUTH AFRICAN LAW 211 E.
EUROPEAN CONTRACT LAW? 212 X INTERSENTIA TABLE OF CONTENTS § 5. REMEDIES
FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT 213 A. INTRODUCTION 213 B. CIVIL LAW 214 1.
TERMINATION 214 2. DAMAGES 215 3. PERFORMANCE 217 C. COMMON LAW 218 1.
TERMINATION 218 2. DAMAGES 219 3. PERFORMANCE 219 D. REMEDIES IN SOUTH
AFRICA 221 1. TERMINATION 221 2. DAMAGES 222 3. PERFORMANCE 222 E. A
EUROPEAN PRIVATE LAW OF REMEDIES? 223 1. TERMINATION 224 2. DAMAGES 225
3. PERFORMANCE 226 § 6. TOWARDS A MIXED LAW OF CONTRACT 227 CHAPTER 7
TORT LAW 229 § 1. INTRODUCTION 229 § 2. THE APPROACH OF FRENCH AND DUTCH
LAW 230 § 3. THE APPROACH OF GERMAN LAW 232 § 4. THE APPROACH OF ENGLISH
LAW 234 § 5. SOUTH AFRICAN TORT LAW 238 § 6. A EUROPEAN LAW OF TORT? 242
CHAPTER 8 THE LAW OF PROPERTY 245 § 1. INTRODUCTION 245 A. A MINIMAL
LEVEL OF UNIFORMITY 245 B. EUROPEAN AND PRIVATE INITIATIVES 246 § 2.
PROLEGOMENA FOR A EUROPEAN PROPERTY LAW: THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
PROPERTY LAW AND THE LAW OF OBLIGATIONS 249 A. INTRODUCTION 249 B. THE
NUMERUS CLAUSUS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE CIVIL LAW . 249 C. THE DEFECTS
OF THE PREVAILING CIVIL LAW THEORY AND THE ALTERNATIVE COMMON LAW
APPROACH 252 § 3. WHEN IS THERE A PROPERTY RIGHT AND WHEN IS THERE A
PERSONAL RIGHT? 254 INTERSENTIA XI TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION 254
B. LOOKING FOR CRITERIA IN THE CIVIL LAW AND IN THE COMMON LAW 254 C.
SOUTH AFRICAN LAW 257 D. EUROPEAN CRITERIA? 260 § 4. THE TRUST IN THE
CIVIL LAW? 262 A. INTRODUCTION 262 B. THE TRUST RELATIONSHIP 263 C. THE
TRUST IN SOUTH AFRICA 266 D. A EUROPEAN TRUST? 268 § 5. TOWARDS A MIXED
LAW OF PROPERTY 269 EPILOGUE TOWARDS A EUROPEAN LEGAL MENTALITY? 271 A.
AN ECLECTIC VIEW OF THE LAW 271 B. A SEARCH FOR THE OPTIMAL MIX OF
UNIFORMITY AND LEGAL CULTURE 272 BIBLIOGRAPHY 275 TABLE OF CASES 295
INDEX 299 INTERSENTIA |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Smits, Jan M. 1967- |
author_GND | (DE-588)142870498 |
author_facet | Smits, Jan M. 1967- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Smits, Jan M. 1967- |
author_variant | j m s jm jms |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV021456105 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KJC985 |
callnumber-raw | KJC985 |
callnumber-search | KJC985 |
callnumber-sort | KJC 3985 |
classification_rvk | PS 3720 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)59182347 (DE-599)BVBBV021456105 |
dewey-full | 346.4 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 346 - Private law |
dewey-raw | 346.4 |
dewey-search | 346.4 |
dewey-sort | 3346.4 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01408nam a2200373 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021456105</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170613 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">010918s2002 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9050951910</subfield><subfield code="9">90-5095-191-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)59182347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021456105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC985</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346.4</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 3720</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139784:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Smits, Jan M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1967-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)142870498</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="240" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europees Privaatrecht in wording</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The making of European private law</subfield><subfield code="b">toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system</subfield><subfield code="c">Jan Smits</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Antwerp [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Intersentia</subfield><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XV, 306 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civil law</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">International unification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://www.bsz-bw.de/depot/metainf/9400000/9457000/9457422t.html</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014676225&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014676225</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Europa |
geographic_facet | Europa |
id | DE-604.BV021456105 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T14:06:18Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:36:23Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9050951910 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014676225 |
oclc_num | 59182347 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-M382 DE-20 DE-11 DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-20 DE-11 DE-188 |
physical | XV, 306 S. |
publishDate | 2002 |
publishDateSearch | 2002 |
publishDateSort | 2002 |
publisher | Intersentia |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Smits, Jan M. 1967- Verfasser (DE-588)142870498 aut Europees Privaatrecht in wording The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system Jan Smits Antwerp [u.a.] Intersentia 2002 XV, 306 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Recht Civil law Europe Law Europe International unification Europa http://www.bsz-bw.de/depot/metainf/9400000/9457000/9457422t.html Abstract GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014676225&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Smits, Jan M. 1967- The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system Recht Civil law Europe Law Europe International unification |
title | The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system |
title_alt | Europees Privaatrecht in wording |
title_auth | The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system |
title_exact_search | The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system |
title_exact_search_txtP | The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system |
title_full | The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system Jan Smits |
title_fullStr | The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system Jan Smits |
title_full_unstemmed | The making of European private law toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system Jan Smits |
title_short | The making of European private law |
title_sort | the making of european private law toward a ius commune europaeum as a mixed legal system |
title_sub | toward a Ius Commune Europaeum as a mixed legal system |
topic | Recht Civil law Europe Law Europe International unification |
topic_facet | Recht Civil law Europe Law Europe International unification Europa |
url | http://www.bsz-bw.de/depot/metainf/9400000/9457000/9457422t.html http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014676225&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smitsjanm europeesprivaatrechtinwording AT smitsjanm themakingofeuropeanprivatelawtowardaiuscommuneeuropaeumasamixedlegalsystem |