The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
München
Sellier [u.a.]
2005
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht
3 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2674715&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XIV, 211 S. |
| ISBN: | 3935808836 9783935808835 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV021233249 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20120911 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 051121s2005 gw m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 976166488 |2 DE-101 | |
| 020 | |a 3935808836 |9 3-935808-83-6 | ||
| 020 | |a 9783935808835 |9 978-3-935808-83-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)890498300 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV021233249 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a gw |c DE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-19 |a DE-12 |a DE-M382 |a DE-521 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K2400 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 340 | |
| 084 | |a PU 1555 |0 (DE-625)139930: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 340 |2 sdnb | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Petsche, Markus A. |d 1976- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)130527092 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration |c Markus A. Petsche |
| 264 | 1 | |a München |b Sellier [u.a.] |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a XIV, 211 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht |v 3 | |
| 502 | |a Zugl.: Firenze, Europ. Univ. Inst., Diss., 2004 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration and award, International | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4132605-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4132605-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht |v 3 |w (DE-604)BV013946133 |9 3 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2674715&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014276047&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014276047 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1805088351369297920 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
THE GROWING AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MARKUS A.
PETSCHE SELLIER. EUROPEAN LAW PUBLISHERS QUADLS TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS V TABLE OF CONTENTS VIL INTRODUCTION I CHAPTER I
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE INCREASING
AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION I. THE LEGITIMACY OF
THE AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE
INTERESTS OF THE ACTORS INVOLVED 7 A. INTERESTS OF THE CONSUMERS OF
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: THE POTENTIAL 'SUPERIORITY' OF
ARBITRATION OVER ORDINARY LITIGATION 8 1. ARBITRATION AS A MORE
EXPEDITIOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MODUS 10 2. ARBITRATION AS A MEANS TO
RESPOND TO THE SPECIFIC NORMATIVE NEEDS OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL
DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1 1 A. THE CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONALITY ] 2 B.
'NEUTRALITY' OF THE APPLICABLE SUBSTANTIVE LAW (SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY)
13 I) SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY IN GENERAL 13 II) SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY IN
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAT ARBITRATION 14 C. PARTY-AUTONOMY 16 D.
PROCEDURAL NEUTRALITY 18 I) PROCEDURAL NEUTRALITY IN GENERAL 18 II)
PROCEDURAL NEUTRALITY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 19 B.
STATE INTERESTS: BENEFITS DERIVED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARBITRAL
DISPUTE RESOLUTION 20 1. ALLEVIATION OF THE ONUS ON THE OVERBURDENED
STATE COURTS AND THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH ARBITRATION 20 2.
THE GROWTH OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE AND THE PRESERVATION OF GLOBAL
PEACE 22 C. INTERESTS OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION 24 V1I1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
II. PRACTICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL
ARBITRATION: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PURSUIT OF INCREASED
AUTONOMY 25 A. UNCITRAL 26 1. THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 'ON THE
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS' 27 2. THE
UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES 28 3. THE UNCITRAL MODEL LAW 29 B.
ARBITRATION INSTITUTIONS 30 1. THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION INSTITUTIONS IN
ENSURING PROCEDURAL EFFICIENCY 31 2. THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION
INSTITUTIONS IN ENSURING THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD 33 3. THE
PARTICULAR ROLE OF THE ICC AS A CONTRIBUTOR TO THE ELABORATION OF
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW 35 III. SUMMARY 36 CHAPTER 2 THE AUTONOMY OF THE
LAW APPLICABLE TO THE MERITS I. THE DRAWBACKS OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS
METHOD 38 A. CLASSICAL DRAWBACKS OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 40 1.
ILLEGITIMACY OF THE PREVALENCE OF CONFLICT OF LAWS JUSTICE (OR PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW JUSTICE) OVER MATERIAL JUSTICE 40 2. COMPLICATING
FACTORS AND UNPREDICTABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 42 A.
CHARACTERISATION 43 B. THE RENVOI 43 C. THE PRELIMINARY (OR INCIDENTAL)
QUESTION 44 D. LEX FORISMOF STATE COURTS 45 E. THE IMPACT OF THE
COMPLICATING FACTORS ON THE PREDICTABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 46 B.
THE INAPPROPRIATENESS OF THE APPLICATION OF DOMESTIC LAWS TO
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND THE INABILITY OF THE CONFLICT
OF LAWS TO ENSURE SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY AND PARTY- AUTONOMY 46 1. THE
INABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS TO ENSURE SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY 47 2.
THE INABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS TO ENSURE PARTY-AUTONOMY 47 II.
THE UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW 49 A. THE
UNIFICATION OF CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES: A MEANS TO ENSURE INTERNATIONAL
NORMATIVE HARMONY 49 TABLE OF CONTENTS [% B. TRADITIONAL TOOLS TO
ACHIEVE SUBSTANTIVE UNIFICATION AND HBERALISATION 51 1. SUBSTANTIVE
UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION AT THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL: THE ADOPTION
OF UNIFORM LAWS 51 2. SUBSTANTIVE UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION AT THE
DOMESTIC LEVEL: THE ADOPTION OF MATERIAL RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL
LAW 53 C. THE DOCTRINE OF LEX MERCATORIA OR TRANSNATIONAL LAW 55 1.
TERMINOLOGY 55 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND EVOLUTION OF THE DOCTRINE OF
LEX MERCATORIA 57 3. THE LEX MERCATORIA DOCTRINE AS A MEANS TO PROMOTE
THE UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW 60 *4.
RECOGNITION OF LEX MERCATORIA BY THE STATE 62 A. VALIDITY OF
CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSES PROVIDING FOR THE APPLICATION OF LEX MERCATORIA 62
B. THE ARBITRATOR'S RIGHT TO APPLY LEX MERCATORIA IN THE ABSENCE OF A
CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSE CONCLUDED BY THE PARTIES 64 I. APPLICATION OF THE
CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES OF THE ARBITRAL SEAT 64 II. APPLICATION OF THE
MOST 'APPROPRIATE' CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES 65 III. THE VOIE DIRECTE
METHOD 66 IV. THE TRONC COMMUN DOCTRINE 67 V. LEX MERCATORIA 67 5.
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES: THE APPLICATION OF LEX MERCATORIA BY STATE COURTS
68 III. SUMMARY 69 CHAPTER 3 THE PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION I. THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND
THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY 71 A. FUNCTIONS OF THE DOCTRINE OF
SEPARABILITY 73 1. SEPARABILITY AND KOMPETENZ-KOMPETENZ 73 2.
SEPARABILITY AND THE VALIDITY OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 74 B. ASPECTS
OF SEPARABILITY: FROM SEPARABILITY TO 'AUTONOMY FROM ALL NATIONAL LAWS'
76 1. PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AUTONOMY AND THE SUBMISSION OF THE
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT TO ITS 'OWN' LAW 76 2. AUTONOMY FROM ALL NATIONAL
LAWS 79 X TABLE OF CONTENTS II. KOMPETENZ-KOMPETENZ 81 A. CONCURRENT
JURISDICTION OF STATE COURTS 82 1. PROCEDURAL CHANNELS OF CHALLENGES TO
ARBITRAL JURISDICTION 83 2. THE EXTENT OF COURT REVIEW OF THE VALIDITY
OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 84 3. THE PRELIMINARY AWARD ON JURISDICTION
85 B. THE PRIORITY RULE 86 III. THE APPOINTMENT AND CHALLENGE OF
ARBITRATORS 87 A. THE LIMITED AUTONOMY OF AD HOC ARBITRATION 88 B. THE
AUTONOMY OF INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 89 1. THE AVAILABILITY OF
MECHANISMS INCREASING THE AUTONOMY OF APPOINTMENT AND CHALLENGE
PROCEDURES 90 2. COURT REVIEW OF INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS 90 IV. THE
ARBITRATOR'S POWER TO ORDER INTERIM AND CONSERVATORY MEASURES 92 A. THE
CONCEPT OF INTERIM AND CONSERVATORY MEASURE 92 B. RECOGNITION OF THE
POWER OF ARBITRATORS TO ORDER INTERIM OR CONSERVATORY MEASURES 93 C. THE
COURTS' CONCURRENT JURISDICTION TO ORDER INTERIM OR CONSERVATORY
MEASURES 94 1. THE LIMITED POWERS OF ARBITRATORS 94 2. COURT ASSISTANCE
95 V. SUMMARY 97 CHAPTER 4 THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD: THE
RESTRICTED SCOPE OF COURT CONTROL OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD I. THE
PROHIBITION OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS (REVISION AU FOND) 99 A. THE
MEANINGOF( THE PROHIBITION OF) REVIEW ON THE MEITS 99 B. THE PROHIBITION
OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ARBITRAL AWARDS 101 1.
THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ARBITRAL AWARDS 101 2. THE
PROHIBITION OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS 102 3.
THE PROHIBITION OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS OF DOMESTIC ARBITRAL AWARDS 103
C. EXCEPTIONAL REVIEW ON THE MERITS 105 1. ENGLAND: THE QUESTION
OFENGLISH LAW J06 TABLE OF CONTENTS XI 2. UNITED STATES: MANIFEST
DISREGARD OF THE LAW (THE MANIFEST DISREGARD EXCEPTION) J06 A. THE
MEANING OF MANIFEST DISREGARD OF THE LAW 106 B. A CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE:
THE APPLICABILITY OF THE MANIFEST DISREGARD EXCEPTION TO NEW YORK
CONVENTION AWARDS 109 I) THE CONCEPT OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION AWARD
109 II) THE APPLICABILITY OF THE MANIFEST DISREGARD EXCEPTION TO NEW
YORK CONVENTION AWARDS HO II. THE LIMITATION OF THE NUMBER OF GROUNDS
INVALIDATING ARBITRAL AWARDS 111 A. GROUNDS AITNED AT THE PROTECTION OF
THE PARTIES' AUTONOMY OF WILL 111 1. LACK OF VALIDITY OF THE ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT 111 2. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE WILL OF THE PARTIES BY THE
ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL 112 B. GROUNDS AIMED AT SAFEGUARDING PROCEDURAL
FAIRNESS 113 1. LACK OF INDEPENDENCE OR IMPARTIALITY OF AN ARBITRATOR
113 2. BREACH OF DUE PROCESS 113 C. GROUNDS AIMED AT PRESERVING STATE
INTERESTS 115 1. ARBITRABILITY 115 2. PUBLIC POLICY 117 III. THE
RESTRICTIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE GROUNDS INVALIDATING ARBITRAL AWARDS
118 A. THE DECLINE OF THE TRADITIONAL HOSTILITY VIS-AE-VIS ARBITRATION
AND THE NON-ARBITRABILITY DOCTRINE 119 1. ARBITRATION AS A THREAT TO THE
STATE MONOPOLY OF JUSTICE 119 2. ARBITRATION AS A THREAT TO DECISIONAL
ACCURACY 119 3. ARBITRATION AS A THREAT TO PUBLIC POLICY 120 4.
ARBITRATION AS AN 'INAPPROPRIATE' DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM 1 22 B.
THE TACIT WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE AN AWARD ON THE BASIS OF A
BREACH OF DUE PROCESS OR THE LACKING IMPARTIALITY/INDEPENDENCE OF AN
ARBITRATOR 1 23 1. THE TACIT WAIVER AS A MANIFESTATION OF THE ESTOPPEL
PRINCIPLE 1 23 2. RECOGNITION OF THE TACIT WAIVER BY LEGISLATORS AND
COURTS 1 2 3 3. THE SCOPE OF WAIVABLE CLAIMS 125 C. THE LOWERING OF THE
DUE PROCESS STANDARD 126 IV. SUMMARY 127 XII TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 5
THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD: INTERNATIONALISATION OF THE
STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS I. DECREASING RECOURSE TO THE
CONFLICT OF LAWS METHOD FOR THE PURPOSES OF ASSESSING THE ENFORCEABILITY
OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 130 A. THE TRADITIONAL PREDOMINANCE OF CONFLICT OF
LAWS RULES 1 30 1. THE DOCTRINE OF LOCALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL
ARBITRATION (AND ARBITRAL AWARDS RENDERED IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION)
131 2. THE NATIONALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (AND ARBITRAL
AWARDS RENDERED IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION) 132 B. DELOCALISATION OF
ARBITRAL AWARDS 133 1. THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF DELOCALISATION
(JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE) 133 2. LEGISLATIVE DELOCALISATION IN PRACTICE
135 C. THE INTERNATIONALISATION OF COURT REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 135
1. THE RATIONALE OF INTERNATIONALISATION 136 2. THE INTERNATIONALISATION
OF COURT REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS AND DUALISTIC APPROACH TO ARBITRATION
137 A. INTERNATIONALITY OF ARBITRATION 138 I) THE DEFINITION OF
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION BY THE SWISS PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW STATUTE
(PILS) 138 II) THE ECONOMIC APPROACH OF THE FRENCH NOUVEAU CODE DE
PROCEDURE CIVILE (NCPC) 139 IUE) RECOURSE TO ALTERNATIVE CRITERIA: THE
UNCITRAL MODEL LAW (MODEL LAW) AND THE ITALIAN CODICE DI PROCEDURA
CIVILE (CPC) 140 IV) THE IMPACT OF THE WILL OF THE PARTIES AND THE
PHENOMENON OF 'AGREED' INTERNATIONALITY 140 B. DUALISTIC ARBITRATION
LEGISLATION 141 C. DUALISTIC CASE-LAW OR 'HIDDEN DUALISM' 143 II.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 144 A. OBJECTIVE
ARBITRABILITY 144 1. THE LACKING NECESSITY TO DEPART FROM THE CONFLICT
OF LAWS METHOD 144 2. LEGISLATIVE MATERIAL RULES: THE GERMAN AND SWISS
EXAMPLES 145 3. THE ELABORATION OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS BY THE
COURTS: THE AMERICAN EXAMPLE 146 A. FROM THE BREMEN TO MITSUBISHI 146 B.
RECOGNITION OF THE SPECIFICITY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 147 C.
RELIANCE ON THE NEW YORK CONVENTION'S PURPOSE OF UNIFYING STANDARDS OF
ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 148 TABLE OF CONTENTS XIII B. PUBLIC
POLICY 150 1. THE GENESIS OF THE CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY:
DOMESTIC, INTERNATIONAL, AND TRANSNATIONAL (OR 'TRULY INTERNATIONAL')
PUBLIC POLICY 150 2. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY AS A TOOL TO INCREASE
THE AUTONOMY OF ARBITRAL AWARDS: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES 152 A.
STATUTORY REFERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY 152 B. A NARROW
READING OF THE PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 153
C. ELABORATION OF INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY STANDARDS BY THE COURTS:
THE AMERICAN EXAMPLE 154 III. SUMMARY 156 CHAPTER 6 THE AUTONOMY OF THE
ARBITRAL AWARD: JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION I. JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION OF
THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 158 A. DELOCALISATION AND PARTY AUTONOMY 158 B.
DELOCALISATION AND THE LACK OF LEGITIMACY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE
LAWOFTHESEAT I59 C. DELOCALISATION IN PRACTICE: INSTITUTIONALISATION AND
PRACTICAL LIMITS OF DELOCALISATION 161 II. THE DECLINING ROLE OF THE
ACTION TO SET ASIDE 162 A. THE JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION OF ARBITRAL
AWARDS AND THE QUESTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF A DECISION
SETTING ASIDE AN ARBITRAL AWARD 162 B. THE JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION OF
ARBITRAL AWARDS IN RECENT ARBITRATION STATUTES: A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
163 1. THE BELGIAN LAW OF 27 MARCH 1985 ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 163
2. ARTICLE 192 OF THE 1987 SWISS PILS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON TUNISIAN AND
SWEDISH ARBITRATION LAW 163 III. JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS ENFORCING ARBITRAL
AWARDS SET ASIDE IN THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN 164 A. LEGAL BASES '64 1. THE
'MORE FAVOURABLE RIGHT' PROVISION CONTAINED IN ARTICLE VII OF THE NEW
YORK CONVENTION 164 2. THE OPTIONAL CHARACTER OF THE REFUSAL TO ENFORCE
AN AWARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE V( 1 )(E) OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION
165 XJV TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. THE SPECIFIC REGIME APPLICABLE UNDER THE
1961 GENEVA CONVENTION 166 B. CONTROVERSY J67 IV. THE INTERESTS LNVOLVED
IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS SET ASIDE IN THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
169 A. THE LACK OF INVOLVEMENT OF STATE INTERESTS 169 B. THE 'FALSE'
CONFLICT BETWEEN EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND PREDICTABILITY
170 C. THE CONFLICT BETWEEN EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND
DECISIONAL (NORMATIVE) HARMONY 171 V. POSSIBLE WAYS OF RECONCILING
INTERNATIONAL NORMATIVE HARMONY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 174
A. THE GENERAL ACCEPTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF CONTROL 174 B.
THE CONDITIONAL RECOGNITION OF DECISIONS SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARDS
175 VI. THE REORGANISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM:
DE-CENTRALISATION AND CENTRALISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT
SYSTEM 176 A. THE DE-CENTRALISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT
SYSTEM 176 B. THE CENTRALISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM
AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CENTRAL AUTHORITY HAVING EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION TO RULE ON THE ENFORCEABILITY/VALIDITY OF ARBITRAL AWARDS
179 VLL.SUMMARY 180 CONCLUSION 181 BIBLIOGRAPHY 187 |
| adam_txt |
THE GROWING AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MARKUS A.
PETSCHE SELLIER. EUROPEAN LAW PUBLISHERS QUADLS TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS V TABLE OF CONTENTS VIL INTRODUCTION I CHAPTER I
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE INCREASING
AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION I. THE LEGITIMACY OF
THE AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE
INTERESTS OF THE ACTORS INVOLVED 7 A. INTERESTS OF THE CONSUMERS OF
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: THE POTENTIAL 'SUPERIORITY' OF
ARBITRATION OVER ORDINARY LITIGATION 8 1. ARBITRATION AS A MORE
EXPEDITIOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MODUS 10 2. ARBITRATION AS A MEANS TO
RESPOND TO THE SPECIFIC NORMATIVE NEEDS OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL
DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1 1 A. THE CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONALITY ] 2 B.
'NEUTRALITY' OF THE APPLICABLE SUBSTANTIVE LAW (SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY)
13 I) SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY IN GENERAL 13 II) SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY IN
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAT ARBITRATION 14 C. PARTY-AUTONOMY 16 D.
PROCEDURAL NEUTRALITY 18 I) PROCEDURAL NEUTRALITY IN GENERAL 18 II)
PROCEDURAL NEUTRALITY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 19 B.
STATE INTERESTS: BENEFITS DERIVED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OF ARBITRAL
DISPUTE RESOLUTION 20 1. ALLEVIATION OF THE ONUS ON THE OVERBURDENED
STATE COURTS AND THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS ASSOCIATED WITH ARBITRATION 20 2.
THE GROWTH OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE AND THE PRESERVATION OF GLOBAL
PEACE 22 C. INTERESTS OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION 24 V1I1 TABLE OF CONTENTS
II. PRACTICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF THE AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL
ARBITRATION: INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF THE PURSUIT OF INCREASED
AUTONOMY 25 A. UNCITRAL 26 1. THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 'ON THE
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS' 27 2. THE
UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES 28 3. THE UNCITRAL MODEL LAW 29 B.
ARBITRATION INSTITUTIONS 30 1. THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION INSTITUTIONS IN
ENSURING PROCEDURAL EFFICIENCY 31 2. THE ROLE OF ARBITRATION
INSTITUTIONS IN ENSURING THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD 33 3. THE
PARTICULAR ROLE OF THE ICC AS A CONTRIBUTOR TO THE ELABORATION OF
INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW 35 III. SUMMARY 36 CHAPTER 2 THE AUTONOMY OF THE
LAW APPLICABLE TO THE MERITS I. THE DRAWBACKS OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS
METHOD 38 A. CLASSICAL DRAWBACKS OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 40 1.
ILLEGITIMACY OF THE PREVALENCE OF CONFLICT OF LAWS JUSTICE (OR PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW JUSTICE) OVER MATERIAL JUSTICE 40 2. COMPLICATING
FACTORS AND UNPREDICTABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 42 A.
CHARACTERISATION 43 B. THE RENVOI 43 C. THE PRELIMINARY (OR INCIDENTAL)
QUESTION 44 D. LEX FORISMOF STATE COURTS 45 E. THE IMPACT OF THE
COMPLICATING FACTORS ON THE PREDICTABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 46 B.
THE INAPPROPRIATENESS OF THE APPLICATION OF DOMESTIC LAWS TO
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND THE INABILITY OF THE CONFLICT
OF LAWS TO ENSURE SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY AND PARTY- AUTONOMY 46 1. THE
INABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS TO ENSURE SUBSTANTIVE NEUTRALITY 47 2.
THE INABILITY OF THE CONFLICT OF LAWS TO ENSURE PARTY-AUTONOMY 47 II.
THE UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW 49 A. THE
UNIFICATION OF CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES: A MEANS TO ENSURE INTERNATIONAL
NORMATIVE HARMONY 49 TABLE OF CONTENTS [% B. TRADITIONAL TOOLS TO
ACHIEVE SUBSTANTIVE UNIFICATION AND HBERALISATION 51 1. SUBSTANTIVE
UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION AT THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL: THE ADOPTION
OF UNIFORM LAWS 51 2. SUBSTANTIVE UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION AT THE
DOMESTIC LEVEL: THE ADOPTION OF MATERIAL RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL
LAW 53 C. THE DOCTRINE OF LEX MERCATORIA OR TRANSNATIONAL LAW 55 1.
TERMINOLOGY 55 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND EVOLUTION OF THE DOCTRINE OF
LEX MERCATORIA 57 3. THE LEX MERCATORIA DOCTRINE AS A MEANS TO PROMOTE
THE UNIFICATION AND LIBERALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW 60 *4.
RECOGNITION OF LEX MERCATORIA BY THE STATE 62 A. VALIDITY OF
CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSES PROVIDING FOR THE APPLICATION OF LEX MERCATORIA 62
B. THE ARBITRATOR'S RIGHT TO APPLY LEX MERCATORIA IN THE ABSENCE OF A
CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSE CONCLUDED BY THE PARTIES 64 I. APPLICATION OF THE
CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES OF THE ARBITRAL SEAT 64 II. APPLICATION OF THE
MOST 'APPROPRIATE' CONFLICT OF LAWS RULES 65 III. THE VOIE DIRECTE
METHOD 66 IV. THE TRONC COMMUN DOCTRINE 67 V. LEX MERCATORIA 67 5.
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES: THE APPLICATION OF LEX MERCATORIA BY STATE COURTS
68 III. SUMMARY 69 CHAPTER 3 THE PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY OF INTERNATIONAL
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION I. THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT AND
THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARABILITY 71 A. FUNCTIONS OF THE DOCTRINE OF
SEPARABILITY 73 1. SEPARABILITY AND KOMPETENZ-KOMPETENZ 73 2.
SEPARABILITY AND THE VALIDITY OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 74 B. ASPECTS
OF SEPARABILITY: FROM SEPARABILITY TO 'AUTONOMY FROM ALL NATIONAL LAWS'
76 1. PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW AUTONOMY AND THE SUBMISSION OF THE
ARBITRATION AGREEMENT TO ITS 'OWN' LAW 76 2. AUTONOMY FROM ALL NATIONAL
LAWS 79 X TABLE OF CONTENTS II. KOMPETENZ-KOMPETENZ 81 A. CONCURRENT
JURISDICTION OF STATE COURTS 82 1. PROCEDURAL CHANNELS OF CHALLENGES TO
ARBITRAL JURISDICTION 83 2. THE EXTENT OF COURT REVIEW OF THE VALIDITY
OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 84 3. THE PRELIMINARY AWARD ON JURISDICTION
85 B. THE PRIORITY RULE 86 III. THE APPOINTMENT AND CHALLENGE OF
ARBITRATORS 87 A. THE LIMITED AUTONOMY OF AD HOC ARBITRATION 88 B. THE
AUTONOMY OF INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION 89 1. THE AVAILABILITY OF
MECHANISMS INCREASING THE AUTONOMY OF APPOINTMENT AND CHALLENGE
PROCEDURES 90 2. COURT REVIEW OF INSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS 90 IV. THE
ARBITRATOR'S POWER TO ORDER INTERIM AND CONSERVATORY MEASURES 92 A. THE
CONCEPT OF INTERIM AND CONSERVATORY MEASURE 92 B. RECOGNITION OF THE
POWER OF ARBITRATORS TO ORDER INTERIM OR CONSERVATORY MEASURES 93 C. THE
COURTS' CONCURRENT JURISDICTION TO ORDER INTERIM OR CONSERVATORY
MEASURES 94 1. THE LIMITED POWERS OF ARBITRATORS 94 2. COURT ASSISTANCE
95 V. SUMMARY 97 CHAPTER 4 THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD: THE
RESTRICTED SCOPE OF COURT CONTROL OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD I. THE
PROHIBITION OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS (REVISION AU FOND) 99 A. THE
MEANINGOF( THE PROHIBITION OF) REVIEW ON THE MEITS 99 B. THE PROHIBITION
OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS OF FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ARBITRAL AWARDS 101 1.
THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC ARBITRAL AWARDS 101 2. THE
PROHIBITION OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS 102 3.
THE PROHIBITION OF REVIEW ON THE MERITS OF DOMESTIC ARBITRAL AWARDS 103
C. EXCEPTIONAL REVIEW ON THE MERITS 105 1. ENGLAND: THE QUESTION
OFENGLISH LAW J06 TABLE OF CONTENTS XI 2. UNITED STATES: MANIFEST
DISREGARD OF THE LAW (THE MANIFEST DISREGARD EXCEPTION) J06 A. THE
MEANING OF MANIFEST DISREGARD OF THE LAW 106 B. A CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE:
THE APPLICABILITY OF THE MANIFEST DISREGARD EXCEPTION TO NEW YORK
CONVENTION AWARDS 109 I) THE CONCEPT OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION AWARD
109 II) THE APPLICABILITY OF THE MANIFEST DISREGARD EXCEPTION TO NEW
YORK CONVENTION AWARDS HO II. THE LIMITATION OF THE NUMBER OF GROUNDS
INVALIDATING ARBITRAL AWARDS 111 A. GROUNDS AITNED AT THE PROTECTION OF
THE PARTIES' AUTONOMY OF WILL 111 1. LACK OF VALIDITY OF THE ARBITRATION
AGREEMENT 111 2. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE WILL OF THE PARTIES BY THE
ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL 112 B. GROUNDS AIMED AT SAFEGUARDING PROCEDURAL
FAIRNESS 113 1. LACK OF INDEPENDENCE OR IMPARTIALITY OF AN ARBITRATOR
113 2. BREACH OF DUE PROCESS 113 C. GROUNDS AIMED AT PRESERVING STATE
INTERESTS 115 1. ARBITRABILITY 115 2. PUBLIC POLICY 117 III. THE
RESTRICTIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE GROUNDS INVALIDATING ARBITRAL AWARDS
118 A. THE DECLINE OF THE TRADITIONAL HOSTILITY VIS-AE-VIS ARBITRATION
AND THE NON-ARBITRABILITY DOCTRINE 119 1. ARBITRATION AS A THREAT TO THE
STATE MONOPOLY OF JUSTICE 119 2. ARBITRATION AS A THREAT TO DECISIONAL
ACCURACY 119 3. ARBITRATION AS A THREAT TO PUBLIC POLICY 120 4.
ARBITRATION AS AN 'INAPPROPRIATE' DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM 1 22 B.
THE TACIT WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE AN AWARD ON THE BASIS OF A
BREACH OF DUE PROCESS OR THE LACKING IMPARTIALITY/INDEPENDENCE OF AN
ARBITRATOR 1 23 1. THE TACIT WAIVER AS A MANIFESTATION OF THE ESTOPPEL
PRINCIPLE 1 23 2. RECOGNITION OF THE TACIT WAIVER BY LEGISLATORS AND
COURTS 1 2 3 3. THE SCOPE OF WAIVABLE CLAIMS 125 C. THE LOWERING OF THE
DUE PROCESS STANDARD 126 IV. SUMMARY 127 XII TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 5
THE AUTONOMY OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD: INTERNATIONALISATION OF THE
STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS I. DECREASING RECOURSE TO THE
CONFLICT OF LAWS METHOD FOR THE PURPOSES OF ASSESSING THE ENFORCEABILITY
OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 130 A. THE TRADITIONAL PREDOMINANCE OF CONFLICT OF
LAWS RULES 1 30 1. THE DOCTRINE OF LOCALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL
ARBITRATION (AND ARBITRAL AWARDS RENDERED IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION)
131 2. THE NATIONALISATION OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION (AND ARBITRAL
AWARDS RENDERED IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION) 132 B. DELOCALISATION OF
ARBITRAL AWARDS 133 1. THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF DELOCALISATION
(JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE) 133 2. LEGISLATIVE DELOCALISATION IN PRACTICE
135 C. THE INTERNATIONALISATION OF COURT REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 135
1. THE RATIONALE OF INTERNATIONALISATION 136 2. THE INTERNATIONALISATION
OF COURT REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS AND DUALISTIC APPROACH TO ARBITRATION
137 A. INTERNATIONALITY OF ARBITRATION 138 I) THE DEFINITION OF
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION BY THE SWISS PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW STATUTE
(PILS) 138 II) THE ECONOMIC APPROACH OF THE FRENCH NOUVEAU CODE DE
PROCEDURE CIVILE (NCPC) 139 IUE) RECOURSE TO ALTERNATIVE CRITERIA: THE
UNCITRAL MODEL LAW (MODEL LAW) AND THE ITALIAN CODICE DI PROCEDURA
CIVILE (CPC) 140 IV) THE IMPACT OF THE WILL OF THE PARTIES AND THE
PHENOMENON OF 'AGREED' INTERNATIONALITY 140 B. DUALISTIC ARBITRATION
LEGISLATION 141 C. DUALISTIC CASE-LAW OR 'HIDDEN DUALISM' 143 II.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 144 A. OBJECTIVE
ARBITRABILITY 144 1. THE LACKING NECESSITY TO DEPART FROM THE CONFLICT
OF LAWS METHOD 144 2. LEGISLATIVE MATERIAL RULES: THE GERMAN AND SWISS
EXAMPLES 145 3. THE ELABORATION OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS BY THE
COURTS: THE AMERICAN EXAMPLE 146 A. FROM THE BREMEN TO MITSUBISHI 146 B.
RECOGNITION OF THE SPECIFICITY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 147 C.
RELIANCE ON THE NEW YORK CONVENTION'S PURPOSE OF UNIFYING STANDARDS OF
ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 148 TABLE OF CONTENTS XIII B. PUBLIC
POLICY 150 1. THE GENESIS OF THE CONCEPT OF INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY:
DOMESTIC, INTERNATIONAL, AND TRANSNATIONAL (OR 'TRULY INTERNATIONAL')
PUBLIC POLICY 150 2. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY AS A TOOL TO INCREASE
THE AUTONOMY OF ARBITRAL AWARDS: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES 152 A.
STATUTORY REFERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY 152 B. A NARROW
READING OF THE PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 153
C. ELABORATION OF INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC POLICY STANDARDS BY THE COURTS:
THE AMERICAN EXAMPLE 154 III. SUMMARY 156 CHAPTER 6 THE AUTONOMY OF THE
ARBITRAL AWARD: JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION I. JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION OF
THE ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS 158 A. DELOCALISATION AND PARTY AUTONOMY 158 B.
DELOCALISATION AND THE LACK OF LEGITIMACY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE
LAWOFTHESEAT I59 C. DELOCALISATION IN PRACTICE: INSTITUTIONALISATION AND
PRACTICAL LIMITS OF DELOCALISATION 161 II. THE DECLINING ROLE OF THE
ACTION TO SET ASIDE 162 A. THE JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION OF ARBITRAL
AWARDS AND THE QUESTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF A DECISION
SETTING ASIDE AN ARBITRAL AWARD 162 B. THE JUDICIAL DELOCALISATION OF
ARBITRAL AWARDS IN RECENT ARBITRATION STATUTES: A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
163 1. THE BELGIAN LAW OF 27 MARCH 1985 ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 163
2. ARTICLE 192 OF THE 1987 SWISS PILS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON TUNISIAN AND
SWEDISH ARBITRATION LAW 163 III. JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS ENFORCING ARBITRAL
AWARDS SET ASIDE IN THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN 164 A. LEGAL BASES '64 1. THE
'MORE FAVOURABLE RIGHT' PROVISION CONTAINED IN ARTICLE VII OF THE NEW
YORK CONVENTION 164 2. THE OPTIONAL CHARACTER OF THE REFUSAL TO ENFORCE
AN AWARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE V( 1 )(E) OF THE NEW YORK CONVENTION
165 XJV TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. THE SPECIFIC REGIME APPLICABLE UNDER THE
1961 GENEVA CONVENTION 166 B. CONTROVERSY J67 IV. THE INTERESTS LNVOLVED
IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF ARBITRAL AWARDS SET ASIDE IN THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
169 A. THE LACK OF INVOLVEMENT OF STATE INTERESTS 169 B. THE 'FALSE'
CONFLICT BETWEEN EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND PREDICTABILITY
170 C. THE CONFLICT BETWEEN EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ARBITRAL AWARD AND
DECISIONAL (NORMATIVE) HARMONY 171 V. POSSIBLE WAYS OF RECONCILING
INTERNATIONAL NORMATIVE HARMONY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ARBITRAL AWARDS 174
A. THE GENERAL ACCEPTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS OF CONTROL 174 B.
THE CONDITIONAL RECOGNITION OF DECISIONS SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARDS
175 VI. THE REORGANISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM:
DE-CENTRALISATION AND CENTRALISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT
SYSTEM 176 A. THE DE-CENTRALISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT
SYSTEM 176 B. THE CENTRALISATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM
AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CENTRAL AUTHORITY HAVING EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION TO RULE ON THE ENFORCEABILITY/VALIDITY OF ARBITRAL AWARDS
179 VLL.SUMMARY 180 CONCLUSION 181 BIBLIOGRAPHY 187 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Petsche, Markus A. 1976- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)130527092 |
| author_facet | Petsche, Markus A. 1976- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Petsche, Markus A. 1976- |
| author_variant | m a p ma map |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV021233249 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K2400 |
| callnumber-raw | K2400 |
| callnumber-search | K2400 |
| callnumber-sort | K 42400 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PU 1555 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)890498300 (DE-599)BVBBV021233249 |
| dewey-full | 340 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340 |
| dewey-search | 340 |
| dewey-sort | 3340 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV021233249</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20120911</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">051121s2005 gw m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">976166488</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3935808836</subfield><subfield code="9">3-935808-83-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783935808835</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-935808-83-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)890498300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV021233249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">DE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K2400</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1555</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139930:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340</subfield><subfield code="2">sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petsche, Markus A.</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)130527092</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration</subfield><subfield code="c">Markus A. Petsche</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">München</subfield><subfield code="b">Sellier [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIV, 211 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht</subfield><subfield code="v">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl.: Firenze, Europ. Univ. Inst., Diss., 2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration and award, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132605-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132605-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht</subfield><subfield code="v">3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV013946133</subfield><subfield code="9">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2674715&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014276047&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014276047</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV021233249 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T13:28:58Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-20T09:06:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 3935808836 9783935808835 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-014276047 |
| oclc_num | 890498300 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-M382 DE-521 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-M382 DE-521 |
| physical | XIV, 211 S. |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publishDateSearch | 2005 |
| publishDateSort | 2005 |
| publisher | Sellier [u.a.] |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht |
| series2 | Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht |
| spelling | Petsche, Markus A. 1976- Verfasser (DE-588)130527092 aut The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration Markus A. Petsche München Sellier [u.a.] 2005 XIV, 211 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht 3 Zugl.: Firenze, Europ. Univ. Inst., Diss., 2004 Arbitration and award, International Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 s DE-604 Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht 3 (DE-604)BV013946133 3 http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2674715&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014276047&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Petsche, Markus A. 1976- The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration Beiträge zum internationalen Wirtschaftsrecht Arbitration and award, International Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4132605-2 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration |
| title_auth | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration |
| title_exact_search | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration |
| title_full | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration Markus A. Petsche |
| title_fullStr | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration Markus A. Petsche |
| title_full_unstemmed | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration Markus A. Petsche |
| title_short | The growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration |
| title_sort | the growing autonomy of international commercial arbitration |
| topic | Arbitration and award, International Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4132605-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Arbitration and award, International Internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://deposit.dnb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2674715&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=014276047&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV013946133 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT petschemarkusa thegrowingautonomyofinternationalcommercialarbitration |