What Roe v. Wade should have said: the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision
A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal a...
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
New York University Press
2005
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation—and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it—and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath |
| Beschreibung: | XIII, 288 S. Ill. |
| ISBN: | 0814799183 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV019985846 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20250424 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 050801s2005 xxua||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2004030565 | ||
| 020 | |a 0814799183 |c cloth : alk. paper |9 0-8147-9918-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)57319728 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV019985846 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-703 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF228.R59 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.7308/4 |2 22 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Roe v. Wade should have said |b the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision |c edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin. Anita L. Allen ... |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a What Roe versus Wade should have said |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b New York University Press |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a XIII, 288 S. |b Ill. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation—and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it—and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath | |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Roe, Jane <1947-> - Procès, instances, etc |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Wade, Henry - Procès, instances, etc |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Roe, Jane |d 1947- |v Trials, litigation, etc |
| 600 | 1 | 4 | |a Wade, Henry |v Trials, litigation, etc |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Avortement - Droit - États-Unis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Procès (Avortement) - États-Unis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion |x Law and legislation |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trials (Abortion) |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schwangerschaftsabbruch |0 (DE-588)4053732-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Auslegung |0 (DE-588)4069008-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schwangerschaftsabbruch |0 (DE-588)4053732-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Auslegung |0 (DE-588)4069008-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Balkin, Jack M. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Allen, Anita L. |d 1953- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)14326768X |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-4798-2446-5 |w (DE-604)BV048607815 |
| 856 | 4 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |u https://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013307842&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |z Inhaltsverzeichnis | |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013307842 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1830270140187410432 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author_GND | (DE-588)14326768X |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV019985846 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF228 |
| callnumber-raw | KF228.R59 |
| callnumber-search | KF228.R59 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 3228 R59 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)57319728 (DE-599)BVBBV019985846 |
| dewey-full | 342.7308/4 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.7308/4 |
| dewey-search | 342.7308/4 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.7308 14 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV019985846</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20250424</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">050801s2005 xxua||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2004030565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0814799183</subfield><subfield code="c">cloth : alk. paper</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8147-9918-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)57319728</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV019985846</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF228.R59</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7308/4</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">What Roe v. Wade should have said</subfield><subfield code="b">the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision</subfield><subfield code="c">edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin. Anita L. Allen ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">What Roe versus Wade should have said</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">New York University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIII, 288 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation—and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it—and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Roe, Jane <1947-> - Procès, instances, etc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wade, Henry - Procès, instances, etc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Roe, Jane</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="v">Trials, litigation, etc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wade, Henry</subfield><subfield code="v">Trials, litigation, etc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Avortement - Droit - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Procès (Avortement) - États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abortion</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trials (Abortion)</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schwangerschaftsabbruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4053732-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069008-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schwangerschaftsabbruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4053732-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069008-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Balkin, Jack M.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Allen, Anita L.</subfield><subfield code="d">1953-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14326768X</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-4798-2446-5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV048607815</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="u">https://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013307842&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="z">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013307842</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV019985846 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-04-24T08:00:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0814799183 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2004030565 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013307842 |
| oclc_num | 57319728 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 |
| physical | XIII, 288 S. Ill. |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publishDateSearch | 2005 |
| publishDateSort | 2005 |
| publisher | New York University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin. Anita L. Allen ... What Roe versus Wade should have said New York New York University Press 2005 XIII, 288 S. Ill. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier A unique introduction to the constitutional arguments for and against the right to abortionIn January 1973, the Supreme Court’s opinion in Roe v. Wade struck down most of the country's abortion laws and held for the first time that the Constitution guarantees women the right to safe and legal abortions. Nearly five decades later, in 2022, the Court’s 5-4 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe and eliminated the constitutional right, stunning the nation. Instead of finally resolving the constitutional issues, Dobbs managed to bring new attention to them while sparking a debate about the Supreme Court’s legitimacy.Originally published in 2005, What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said asked eleven distinguished constitutional scholars to rewrite the opinions in this landmark case in light of thirty years’ experience but making use only of sources available at the time of the original decision. Offering the best arguments for and against the constitutional right to abortion, the contributors have produced a series of powerful essays that get to the heart of this fascinating case. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed historical introduction that chronicles the Roe litigation—and the constitutional and political clashes that followed it—and explains the Dobbs decision and its aftermath Roe, Jane <1947-> - Procès, instances, etc Wade, Henry - Procès, instances, etc Roe, Jane 1947- Trials, litigation, etc Wade, Henry Trials, litigation, etc USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf Avortement - Droit - États-Unis Procès (Avortement) - États-Unis Recht Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 gnd rswk-swf Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd rswk-swf USA USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 s Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 s DE-604 Balkin, Jack M. Sonstige oth Allen, Anita L. 1953- Sonstige (DE-588)14326768X oth Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-4798-2446-5 (DE-604)BV048607815 GBV Datenaustausch https://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013307842&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision Roe, Jane <1947-> - Procès, instances, etc Wade, Henry - Procès, instances, etc Roe, Jane 1947- Trials, litigation, etc Wade, Henry Trials, litigation, etc USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Avortement - Droit - États-Unis Procès (Avortement) - États-Unis Recht Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 gnd Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4053732-8 (DE-588)4069008-8 |
| title | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision |
| title_alt | What Roe versus Wade should have said |
| title_auth | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision |
| title_exact_search | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision |
| title_full | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin. Anita L. Allen ... |
| title_fullStr | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin. Anita L. Allen ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | What Roe v. Wade should have said the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin. Anita L. Allen ... |
| title_short | What Roe v. Wade should have said |
| title_sort | what roe v wade should have said the nation s top legal experts rewrite america s most controversial decision |
| title_sub | the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision |
| topic | Roe, Jane <1947-> - Procès, instances, etc Wade, Henry - Procès, instances, etc Roe, Jane 1947- Trials, litigation, etc Wade, Henry Trials, litigation, etc USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Avortement - Droit - États-Unis Procès (Avortement) - États-Unis Recht Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 gnd Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Roe, Jane <1947-> - Procès, instances, etc Wade, Henry - Procès, instances, etc Roe, Jane 1947- Trials, litigation, etc Wade, Henry Trials, litigation, etc USA Supreme Court Avortement - Droit - États-Unis Procès (Avortement) - États-Unis Recht Abortion Law and legislation United States Trials (Abortion) United States Rechtsprechung Schwangerschaftsabbruch Auslegung USA |
| url | https://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:443/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013307842&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT balkinjackm whatroevwadeshouldhavesaidthenationstoplegalexpertsrewriteamericasmostcontroversialdecision AT allenanital whatroevwadeshouldhavesaidthenationstoplegalexpertsrewriteamericasmostcontroversialdecision AT balkinjackm whatroeversuswadeshouldhavesaid AT allenanital whatroeversuswadeshouldhavesaid |