Employment efficiency and sticky wages: evidence from flows in the labor market
I consider three views of the labor market. In the first, wages are flexible and employment follows the principle of bilateral efficiency. Workers never lose their jobs because of sticky wages. In the second view, wages are sticky and inefficient layoffs do occur. In the third, wages are also sticky...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2005
|
| Schriftenreihe: | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series
11183 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | I consider three views of the labor market. In the first, wages are flexible and employment follows the principle of bilateral efficiency. Workers never lose their jobs because of sticky wages. In the second view, wages are sticky and inefficient layoffs do occur. In the third, wages are also sticky, but employment governance is efficient. I show that the behavior of flows in the labor market strongly favors the third view. In the modern U.S. economy, recessions do not begin with a burst of layoffs. Unemployment rises because jobs are hard to find, not because an unusual number of people are thrown into unemployment. |
| Beschreibung: | 29 S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV019896992 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20100224 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 050725s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)254394840 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV019896992 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-521 |a DE-19 | ||
| 084 | |a QB 910 |0 (DE-625)141231: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hall, Robert E. |d 1943- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)120536064 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Employment efficiency and sticky wages |b evidence from flows in the labor market |c Robert E. Hall |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2005 | |
| 300 | |a 29 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11183 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a I consider three views of the labor market. In the first, wages are flexible and employment follows the principle of bilateral efficiency. Workers never lose their jobs because of sticky wages. In the second view, wages are sticky and inefficient layoffs do occur. In the third, wages are also sticky, but employment governance is efficient. I show that the behavior of flows in the labor market strongly favors the third view. In the modern U.S. economy, recessions do not begin with a burst of layoffs. Unemployment rises because jobs are hard to find, not because an unusual number of people are thrown into unemployment. | |
| 648 | 4 | |a 1947-2001 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theorie der Arbeitslosigkeit / Arbeitslosigkeit / Konjunktur / Lohnrigidität / Theorie / USA | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
| 830 | 0 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11183 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 11183 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11183.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013221089 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804133434576076800 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Hall, Robert E. 1943- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)120536064 |
| author_facet | Hall, Robert E. 1943- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Hall, Robert E. 1943- |
| author_variant | r e h re reh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV019896992 |
| classification_rvk | QB 910 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)254394840 (DE-599)BVBBV019896992 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| era | 1947-2001 |
| era_facet | 1947-2001 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01993nam a2200349 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV019896992</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100224 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">050725s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)254394840</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV019896992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">QB 910</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141231:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hall, Robert E.</subfield><subfield code="d">1943-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)120536064</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Employment efficiency and sticky wages</subfield><subfield code="b">evidence from flows in the labor market</subfield><subfield code="c">Robert E. Hall</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">29 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">I consider three views of the labor market. In the first, wages are flexible and employment follows the principle of bilateral efficiency. Workers never lose their jobs because of sticky wages. In the second view, wages are sticky and inefficient layoffs do occur. In the third, wages are also sticky, but employment governance is efficient. I show that the behavior of flows in the labor market strongly favors the third view. In the modern U.S. economy, recessions do not begin with a burst of layoffs. Unemployment rises because jobs are hard to find, not because an unusual number of people are thrown into unemployment.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">1947-2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Theorie der Arbeitslosigkeit / Arbeitslosigkeit / Konjunktur / Lohnrigidität / Theorie / USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11183</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">11183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11183.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013221089</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV019896992 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:08:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013221089 |
| oclc_num | 254394840 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-703 DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 29 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2005 |
| publishDateSearch | 2005 |
| publishDateSort | 2005 |
| publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
| record_format | marc |
| series | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
| series2 | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
| spelling | Hall, Robert E. 1943- Verfasser (DE-588)120536064 aut Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market Robert E. Hall Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2005 29 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11183 I consider three views of the labor market. In the first, wages are flexible and employment follows the principle of bilateral efficiency. Workers never lose their jobs because of sticky wages. In the second view, wages are sticky and inefficient layoffs do occur. In the third, wages are also sticky, but employment governance is efficient. I show that the behavior of flows in the labor market strongly favors the third view. In the modern U.S. economy, recessions do not begin with a burst of layoffs. Unemployment rises because jobs are hard to find, not because an unusual number of people are thrown into unemployment. 1947-2001 Theorie der Arbeitslosigkeit / Arbeitslosigkeit / Konjunktur / Lohnrigidität / Theorie / USA Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11183 (DE-604)BV002801238 11183 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11183.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Hall, Robert E. 1943- Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series Theorie der Arbeitslosigkeit / Arbeitslosigkeit / Konjunktur / Lohnrigidität / Theorie / USA |
| title | Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market |
| title_auth | Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market |
| title_exact_search | Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market |
| title_full | Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market Robert E. Hall |
| title_fullStr | Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market Robert E. Hall |
| title_full_unstemmed | Employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market Robert E. Hall |
| title_short | Employment efficiency and sticky wages |
| title_sort | employment efficiency and sticky wages evidence from flows in the labor market |
| title_sub | evidence from flows in the labor market |
| topic | Theorie der Arbeitslosigkeit / Arbeitslosigkeit / Konjunktur / Lohnrigidität / Theorie / USA |
| topic_facet | Theorie der Arbeitslosigkeit / Arbeitslosigkeit / Konjunktur / Lohnrigidität / Theorie / USA |
| url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11183.pdf |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hallroberte employmentefficiencyandstickywagesevidencefromflowsinthelabormarket |