Taking sides: clashing views on controversial environmental issues
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Buch |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Guilford
Dushkin/McGraw-Hill
2004
|
Ausgabe: | 10. ed. |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XXIII, 437 S. |
ISBN: | 0072933178 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV019890040 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20111207 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 050719s2004 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0072933178 |9 0-07-293317-8 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)53871783 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV019890040 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-703 | ||
050 | 0 | |a GE170 | |
080 | |a AR 28000 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 363.7 |2 21 | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Taking sides |b clashing views on controversial environmental issues |c selected, ed. and with introd. by Thomas A. Easton ... |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a Clashing views on controversial environmental issues |
250 | |a 10. ed. | ||
264 | 1 | |a Guilford |b Dushkin/McGraw-Hill |c 2004 | |
300 | |a XXIII, 437 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
650 | 4 | |a Umweltpolitik | |
650 | 4 | |a Umweltschutz | |
650 | 4 | |a Environmental ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Environmental policy | |
650 | 4 | |a Environmental protection | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Umweltpolitik |0 (DE-588)4078523-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Umwelt |0 (DE-588)4061616-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Umwelt |0 (DE-588)4061616-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Umweltpolitik |0 (DE-588)4078523-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Easton, Thomas A. |d 1944- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)172058414 |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013214064&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013214064 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804133424406986752 |
---|---|
adam_text | Contents
Preface i
Introduction: Environmental Issues: The Never Ending Debate xii
PART 1 PHILOSOPHY AND POLITICS 1
Issue 1. Should a Price Be Put on the Goods and Services
Provided by the World s Ecosystems? 2
YES: Janet N. Abramovitz, from Putting a Value on Nature s Free
Services, World Watch (January/February 1998) 4
NO: Marino Gatto and Giulio A. De Leo, from Pricing Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Services: The Never Ending Story, BioScience (April 2000)
16
Janet N. Abramovitz, a senior researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, ar
gues that if we fail to attach economic value to supposedly free Services
provided by nature, we are more likely to misuse and destroy the ecosys¬
tems that provide those Services. Professors of applied ecology Marino
Gatto and Giulio A. De Leo contend that the pricing approach to valu
ing nature s Services is misleading because it falsely implies that only
economic values matter.
Issue 2. Is Biodiversity Overprotected? 26
YES: David N. Laband, from Regulating Biodiversity: Tragedy in the
Political Commons, Ideas on Liberty (September 2001) 28
NO: E. O. Wilson, from Why Biodiversity Matters, interview by Kris
Christen, OECD Observer (Summer 2001) 32
Professor of economics David N. Laband argues that the public demands
excessive amounts of biodiversity largely because decision makers and
voters do not have to bear the costs of producing it. In an interview with
science writer Kris Christen, biologist E. O. Wilson argues that biodiversity
is crucial to human survival and that efforts need to be increased to pro
tect it. He maintains that the loss of species reduces the productivity and
stability of natural ecosystems and that with each species lost, potential
drugs and other valuable resources are also lost.
Issue 3. Are Environmental Regulations Too Restrictive? 38
YES: Peter W. Huber, from Saving the Environment From the
Environmentalists, Commentary (April 1998) 40
NO: Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich, from Brownlash: The New
Environmental Anti Science, The Humanist (November/December
19%) 49
Peter W. Huber, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, argues that
the environment is best protected by traditional conservation, which puts
Contents In Brief
PART 1 Philosophy and Politics 1
Issue 1. Should a Price Be Put on the Goods and Services Provided
by the World s Ecosystems? 2
Issue 2. Is Biodiversity Overprotected? 26
Issue 3. Are Environmental Regulations Too Restrictive? 38
Issue 4. Should Environmental Policy Attempt to Cure Environmental
Racism? 58
Issue 5. Is the Precautionary Principle a Sound Basis for International
Policy? 76
Issue 6. Do Environmentalists Overstate Their Case? 102
PART 2 Environmental Impacts 117
Issue 7. Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Be Opened to Oil
Drilling? 118
Issue 8. Should DDT Be Banned Worldwide? 138
Issue 9. Is Genetic Engineering an Environmentally Sound Way to
Increase Food Production? 154
Issue 10. Do Environmental Hormone Mimics Pose a Potentially
Serious Health Threat? 184
Issue 11. Is the Environmental Protection Agency s Decision to
Tighten Air Quality Standards for Ozone and Particulates
Justified? 208
Issue 12. Do Human Activities Threaten to Change the Global Climate?
232
PART 3 Disposing of Wastes 257
Issue 13. Hazardous Waste: Should the Polluter Pays Provision of
Superfund Be Weakened? 258
Issue 14. Municipal Waste: Is Recycling an Environmentally and
Economically Sound Waste Management Strategy? 276
Issue 15. Nuclear Waste: Should the United States Continue to Focus
Plans for Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal
Exclusively at Yucca Mountain? 294
PART 4 Potential Solutions 313
Issue 16. Is Limiting Population Growth a Key Factor in Protecting the
Global Environment? 314
Issue 17. Will Pollution Rights Trading Effectively Control
Environmental Problems? 334
Issue 18. Will Voluntary Action by Industry Reduce the Need for
Future Environmental Regulation? 350
Issue 19. Is Sustainable Development Compatible With Human
Weifare? 370
Vi CONTENTS
human concerns first. Environmental scientists Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne
H. Ehrlich argue that many objections to environmental protections are
self serving and based in bad or misused science.
Issue 4. Should Environmental Policy Attempt to Cure
Environmental Racism? 58
YES: Robert D. Bullard, from Dismantling Environmental Racism in the
USA, Local Environment (vol. 4, no. 1, 1999) 60
NO: David Friedman, from The Environmental Racism Hoax, The
American Enterprise (November/December 1998) 69
Professor of sociology Robert D. Bullard argues that environmental racism
is a genuine phenomenon and that the government must live up to its man
date to protect all people. Writer and social analyst David Friedman denies
the existence of environmental racism. He argues that the environmental
justice movement is a government sanctioned political ploy that will hurt
urban minorities by driving away industrial Jobs.
Issue 5. Is the Precautionary Principle a Sound Basis for
International Policy? 76
YES: Paul L. Stein, from Are Decision Makers Too Cautious With the
Precautionary Principle? Paper Delivered at the Land and
Environment Court of New South Wales Annual Conference (October
14 15, 1999) 78
NO: Henry I. Miller and Gregory Conko, from The Perils of
Precaution, Policy Review üune July 2001) 89
Paul L. Stein, a justice of the New South Wales Court of Appeals, argues
that the precautionary principle is now a cornerstone of international envi¬
ronmental law and that the courts have a duty to implement the principle
even beyond the requirements of legislation. Henry I. Miller, a research fel
low at Stanford University s Hoover Institution, and policy analyst Gregory
Conko argue that the precautionary principle leads regulators to aban
don the careful balancing of risks and benefits, blocks progress, limits the
freedom of scientific researchers, and restricts consumer choice.
Issue 6. Do Environmentalists Overstate Their Case? 102
YES: Ronald Bailey, from Debunking Green Myths, Reason (February
2002) 104
NO: David Pimentel, from Skeptical of the Skeptical Environmentalist,
Skeptic (vol. 9, no. 2, 2002) 108
Environmental Journalist Ronald Bailey argues that the natural environ
ment is not in trouble, despite the arguments of many environmentalists
that it is. He holds that the greatest danger facing the environment is not
human activity but ideological environmentalism, with its hostility to eco
nomic growth and technological progress. David Pimentel, a professor of
insect ecology and agricultural sciences, argues that those who contend
that the environment is not threatened are using data selectively and that
the supply of basic resources to support human life is declining rapidly.
CONTENTS VÜ
PART 2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 117
Issue 7. Should the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Be
Opened to Oil Drilling? 118
YES: Dwight R. Lee, from To Drill or Not to Drill: Let the
Environmentalists Decide, The Independent Review (Fall 2001) 120
NO: Amory B. Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins, from Fool s Gold in
Alaska, Foreign Affairs Üuly/August 2001) 129
Professor of economics Dwight R. Lee argues that the economic and other
benefits of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) oil are so great that
even environmentalists should agree to permit drilling—and they probably
would if they stood to benefit directly. Physicist Amory B. Lovins and lawyer
L. Hunter Lovins assert that recovering ANWR oil is too costly and too
vulnerable to disruption. They hold that alternatives such as developing
greater fuel efficiency are wiser choices for meeting future energy needs.
Issue 8. Should DDT Be Banned Worldwide? 138
YES: Anne Platt McGinn, from Malaria, Mosquitoes, and DDT, World
Watch (May/June 2002) 140
NO: Roger Bäte, from A Case of the DDTs, National Review (May 14,
2001) 149
Anne Platt McGinn, a senior researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, ar¬
gues that although DDT is still used to fight malaria, Ihere are other, more
effective and less environmentally harmful methods. She maintains that
DDT should be banned or reserved for emergency use. Roger Bäte, direc
tor of Africa Fighting Malaria, asserts that DDT is the cheapest and most
effective way to combat malaria and that it should remain available for use.
Issue 9. Is Genetic Engineering an Environmentally Sound
Way to Increase Food Production? 154
YES: Royal Society of London et al., from Transgenic Plants and World
Agriculture, A Report Prepared Under the Auspices of the Royal
Society of London, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, the
Brazilian Academy of Sciences, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the
Indian National Science Academy, the Mexican Academy of Sciences,
and the Third World Academy of Sciences (July 2000) 156
NO: Brian Haiweil, from The Emperor s New Crops, World Watch
Guly/August 1999) 171
The national academies of science of the United Kingdom, the United
States, Brazil, China, India, Mexico, and the Third World argue that ge
netically modified crops hold the potential to feed the world during the
twenty first Century while also protecting the environment. Brian Haiweil,
a researcher at the Worldwatch Institute, argues that the genetic modifi
cation of crops threatens to produce pesticide resistant insect pests and
herbicide resistant weeds, will victimize poor farmers, and is unlikely to
feed the world.
VÜi CONTENTS
Issue 10. Do Environmental Hormone Mimics Pose a
Potentially Serious Health Threat? 184
YES: Sheldon Krimsky, from Hormone Disruptors: A Clue to
Understanding the Environmental Causes of Disease, Environment
(June 2001) 186
NO: Stephen H. Safe, from Environmental and Dietary Estrogens and
Human Health: Is There a Problem? Environmental Health Perspectives
(April 1995) 197
Professor of urban and environmental policy Sheldon Krimsky summarizes
the evidence indicating that many Chemicals released to the environment
affect the endocrine Systems of animals and humans and may threaten
human health with cancers, reproductive anomalies, and neurological ef
fects. Toxicologist Stephen H. Safe argues that the Suggestion that indus
trial estrogenic compounds contribute to increased cancer incidence and
reproductive problems in humans is not plausible.
Issue 11. Is the Environmental Protection Agency s Decision
to Tighten Air Quality Standards for Ozone and
Particulatesjustified? 208
YES: Carol M. Browner, from Statement Before the Subcommittee on
Clean Air, Wetlands, Private Property and Nuclear Safety, Committee
on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate (February 12, 1997)
210
NO: Daniel B. Menzel, from Statement Before the Subcommittee on
Clean Air, Wetlands, Private Property and Nuclear Safety, Committee
on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate (February 5, 1997)
221
Carol M. Browner, administrator for the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), summarizes the evidence and arguments that were the basis for
the EPA s proposal for more stringent Standards for ozone and partic
ulates. Daniel B. Menzel, a professor of environmental medicine and a
researcher on air pollution toxicology, argues that adequate research has
not been done to demonstrate that the new Standards will result in the ad
ditional public health benefits that would justify the difficulty and expense
associated with their implementation.
Issue 12. Do Human Activities Threaten to Change the Global
Climate? 232
YES: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, from Climate
Change 2001: The Scientifk Basis, A Report of Working Group I of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) 234
NO: Kevin A. Shapiro, from Too Darn Hot? Commentary (June 2001)
247
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change states that global warm
ing appears to be real, with Strang effects on sea level, ice cover, and
rainfall patterns to come, and that human activities—particularly emis
sions of carbon dioxide—are to blame. Neuroscience researcher Kevin A.
Shapiro argues that past global warming predictions have been wrong and
CONTENTS ix
that the data do not support calls for immediate action to reduce emissions
of carbon dioxide.
PART 3 DISPOSING OF WASTES 257
Issue 13. Hazardous Waste: Should the Polluter Pays
Provision of Superf und Be Weakened? 258
YES: Bernard J. Reilly, from Stop Superfund Waste, Issues in Science
and Technology (Spring 1993) 260
NO: Ted Williams, from The Sabotage of Superfund, Audubon (July/
August 1993) 268
DuPont corporate counsel Bernard J. Reilly argues that the Superfund
legislation has led to unfair Standards and waste cleanup cost delegation.
Audubon contributing editor Ted Williams wams against turning Superfund
into a public welfare program for polluters.
Issue 14. Municipal Waste: Is Recycling an Environmentally
and Economically Sound Waste Management
Strategy? 276
YES: Richard A. Denison and John F. Ruston, from Recycling Is Not
Garbage, Technology Review (October 1997) 278
NO: Chris Hendrickson, Lester Lave, and Francis McMichael, from
Time to Dump Recycling? Issues in Science and Technology (Spring
1995) 285
Environmental Defense Fund scientist Richard A. Denison and economic
analyst John F. Ruston rebut a series of myths that they say have been
promoted by industrial opponents in an effort to undermine the envi¬
ronmentally valuable and successful recycling movement. Engineering
and economics researchers Chris Hendrickson, Lester Lave, and Francis
McMichael assert that ambitious recycling programs are often too costly
and are of dubious environmental value.
Issue 15. Nuclear Waste: Should the United States Continue
to Focus Plans for Permanent Nuclear Waste
Disposal Exclusively at Yucca Mountain? 294
YES: Spencer Abraham, from Recommendation by the Secretary of Energy
Regarding the Suitability ofthe Yucca Mountain Site for a Repository
Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (February 2002) 296
NO: Jon Christensen, from Nuclear Roulette, Motherfones (September/
October 2001) 307
Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham argues that the Yucca Mountain,
Nevada, nuclear waste disposal Site is suitable technically and scientifi
cally and that its development serves the U.S. national interest in numer
ous ways. Science writer Jon Christensen argues that it is impossible to
forecast with confidence that nuclear waste entombed in Yucca Mountain
will not threaten the environment over the next 10,000 (or more) years.
X CONTENTS
PART 4 POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS 313
Issue 16. Is Limiting Population Growth a Key Factor in
Protecting the Global Environment? 314
YES: Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich, from The Population
Explosion: Why We Should Care and What We Should Do About It,
Environmental Law (vol. 27, no. 4, 1997) 316
NO: Stephen Moore, from Body Count, National Review (October 25,
1999) 326
Population biologists Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich argue that if
humanity fails to reduce the impact of population in terms of both numbers
and resource consumption, it faces the prospect of environmental disaster.
Stephen Moore, director of the Cato Institute, argues that human numbers
pose no threat to human survival or the environment but that efforts to
control population do threaten human freedom and worth.
Issue 17. Will Pollution Rights Trading Effectively Control
Environmental Problems? 334
YES: Charles W. Schmidt, from The Market for Pollution,
Environmental Health Perspectives (August 2001) 336
NO: Brian Tokar, from Trading Away the Earth: Pollution Credits and
the Perils of Free Market Environmentalism, Dollars Sense
(March/April 1996) 342
Freelance science writer Charles W. Schmidt argues that economic incen
tives such as emissions rights trading offer the most useful approaches
to reducing pollution. Author, College teacher, and environmental activist
Brian Tokar maintains that pollution credits and other market oriented envi¬
ronmental protection policies do nothing to reduce pollution while transfer¬
ring the power to protect the environment from the public to large corporate
polluters.
Issue 18. Will Voluntary Action by Industry Reduce the Need
for Future Environmental Regulation? 350
YES: Raymond J. Patchak and William R. Smith, from ISO 14000
Perspective: So Long! Command and Control... Hello! ISO 14000
(December 1998) 352
NO: Linda Greer and Christopher van Loben Sels, from When
Pollution Prevention Meets the Bottom Line, Environmental Science
and Technology (vol. 31, no. 9, 1997) 360
Certified hazardous materials managers Raymond J. Patchak and William
R. Smith describe the voluntary ISO 14000 environmental program devel
oped by the International Organization for Standardization. They assert
that this initiative will result in increased environmental protection by per
mitting industry more flexibility in achieving pollution prevention than cur
rent command and control regulations do. Environmental Defense Fund
scientist Linda Greer and project analyst Christopher van Loben Sels con
clude from a case study of a Dow Chemical facility that not even projected
cost savings will ensure that a corporation will adopt a voluntary pollution
prevention plan.
CONTENTS Xi
Issue 19. Is Sustainable Development Compatible With
Human Weifare? 370
YES: Dinah M. Payne and Cecily A. Raiborn, from Sustainable
Development: The Ethics Support the Economics, Journal of Business
Ethics (July 2001) 372
NO: Ronald Bailey, from Wilting Greens, Reason (December 2002)
382
Professor of management Dinah M. Payne and professor of accounting
Cecily A. Raiborn argue that environmental responsibility and sustain¬
able development are essential parts of modern business ethics and that
only through them can both business and humans thrive. Environmen¬
tal Journalist Ronald Bailey states that sustainable development results in
economic Stagnation and threatens both the environment and the world s
poor.
Contributors 386
Index 392
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author_GND | (DE-588)172058414 |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV019890040 |
callnumber-first | G - Geography, Anthropology, Recreation |
callnumber-label | GE170 |
callnumber-raw | GE170 |
callnumber-search | GE170 |
callnumber-sort | GE 3170 |
callnumber-subject | GE - Environmental Sciences |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)53871783 (DE-599)BVBBV019890040 |
dewey-full | 363.7 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 363 - Other social problems and services |
dewey-raw | 363.7 |
dewey-search | 363.7 |
dewey-sort | 3363.7 |
dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
discipline | Soziologie |
edition | 10. ed. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01693nam a2200457 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV019890040</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20111207 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">050719s2004 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0072933178</subfield><subfield code="9">0-07-293317-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)53871783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV019890040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GE170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR 28000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">363.7</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Taking sides</subfield><subfield code="b">clashing views on controversial environmental issues</subfield><subfield code="c">selected, ed. and with introd. by Thomas A. Easton ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Clashing views on controversial environmental issues</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10. ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Guilford</subfield><subfield code="b">Dushkin/McGraw-Hill</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIII, 437 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Umweltpolitik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Umweltschutz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environmental protection</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Umweltpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078523-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Umwelt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061616-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Umwelt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061616-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Umweltpolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078523-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Easton, Thomas A.</subfield><subfield code="d">1944-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)172058414</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013214064&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013214064</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
id | DE-604.BV019890040 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T20:08:30Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0072933178 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-013214064 |
oclc_num | 53871783 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29 DE-703 |
owner_facet | DE-29 DE-703 |
physical | XXIII, 437 S. |
publishDate | 2004 |
publishDateSearch | 2004 |
publishDateSort | 2004 |
publisher | Dushkin/McGraw-Hill |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues selected, ed. and with introd. by Thomas A. Easton ... Clashing views on controversial environmental issues 10. ed. Guilford Dushkin/McGraw-Hill 2004 XXIII, 437 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Umweltpolitik Umweltschutz Environmental ethics Environmental policy Environmental protection Umweltpolitik (DE-588)4078523-3 gnd rswk-swf Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 s Umweltpolitik (DE-588)4078523-3 s DE-604 Easton, Thomas A. 1944- Sonstige (DE-588)172058414 oth HBZ Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013214064&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues Umweltpolitik Umweltschutz Environmental ethics Environmental policy Environmental protection Umweltpolitik (DE-588)4078523-3 gnd Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4078523-3 (DE-588)4061616-2 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
title | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues |
title_alt | Clashing views on controversial environmental issues |
title_auth | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues |
title_exact_search | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues |
title_full | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues selected, ed. and with introd. by Thomas A. Easton ... |
title_fullStr | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues selected, ed. and with introd. by Thomas A. Easton ... |
title_full_unstemmed | Taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues selected, ed. and with introd. by Thomas A. Easton ... |
title_short | Taking sides |
title_sort | taking sides clashing views on controversial environmental issues |
title_sub | clashing views on controversial environmental issues |
topic | Umweltpolitik Umweltschutz Environmental ethics Environmental policy Environmental protection Umweltpolitik (DE-588)4078523-3 gnd Umwelt (DE-588)4061616-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Umweltpolitik Umweltschutz Environmental ethics Environmental policy Environmental protection Umwelt Aufsatzsammlung |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=013214064&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eastonthomasa takingsidesclashingviewsoncontroversialenvironmentalissues AT eastonthomasa clashingviewsoncontroversialenvironmentalissues |