Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Oxford Univ. Press
2003
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | VI, 276 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780199268924 0199268924 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV019354031 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20091118 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 040803s2003 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780199268924 |9 978-0-19-926892-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 0199268924 |9 0-19-926892-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)53155468 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV019354031 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-M382 |a DE-11 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K4610 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.754 |2 21 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2353 |0 (DE-625)139576: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Oesch, Matthias |d 1972- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1041763441 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution |c Matthias Oesch |
| 250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 2003 | |
| 300 | |a VI, 276 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a Organisation mondiale du commerce |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a World Trade Organization. |b Appellate Body |v Rules and practice |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a World Trade Organization |0 (DE-588)2145784-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Commerce extérieur - Réglementation | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationale arbitrage |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Règlement de conflits | |
| 650 | 7 | |a World Trade Organization |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration agreements, Commercial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration and award, International | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dispute resolution (Law) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Foreign trade regulation | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mitglied |0 (DE-588)4114609-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Maßnahme |0 (DE-588)4200802-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Prüfung |0 (DE-588)4047609-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a World Trade Organization |0 (DE-588)2145784-0 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Mitglied |0 (DE-588)4114609-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Maßnahme |0 (DE-588)4200802-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Prüfung |0 (DE-588)4047609-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=012818022&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-012818022 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804132785487609856 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN WTO DISPUTE RESOLUTION MATTHIAS OESCH OXTORD
UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS FOREWORD V GENERAL EDITOR S PREFACE V ;J
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS J X ABBREVIATIONS X J INTRODUCTION I. THE QUEST FOR
APPROPRIATE STANDARDS OF REVIEW 3 II. POWER-ORIENTED GATT 1947 DISPUTE
RESOLUTION 4 III. RULE-ORIENTED WTO DISPUTE RESOLUTION 5 A. THE
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT UNDERSTANDING (DSU) 5 B. THE LACK OF GENERALLY
APPLICABLE RULES ON STANDARDS OF REVIEW 6 IV. STOCKTAKING 7 A. THE
IRRELEVANCE OF DOMESTIC STANDARD-OF-REVIEW CONCEPTS 7 B. CONTENTS 8 1.
FOUNDATIONS 8 2. THE CASE LAW 8 I. FOUNDATIONS 1 THE DEFINITION OF
STANDARDS OF REVIEW 13 I. A CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION 13 II. THE EXTREMES:
DE NOVO REVIEW AND TOTAL DEFERENCE 15 III. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
FACTS AND LAW 16 A. THE CATEGORIZATION OF FACTS AND WTO LAW 17 1. FACTS
18 2. WTO LAW 18 B. THE CATEGORIZATION OF DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
19 1. DOMESTIC LAW 20 2. INTERNATIONAL LAW 21 IV. APPELLATE BODY REVIEW
OF PANEL REPORTS 21 2 THE FUNCTIONS OF STANDARDS OF REVIEW 23 I. THE
ALLOCATION OF POWER 23 A. THE EMBODIMENT OF A FINELY DRAWN BALANCE 23 B.
OTHER TECHNIQUES 24 II. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PANELS AND THE MEMBERS
25 A. INTERNATIONAL INTERDEPENDENCE 25 XIV CONTENTS B. NATIONAL
SOVEREIGNTY 26 C. THE VERTICAL ALLOCATION OF POWER 28 D. NATIONAL
SOVEREIGNTY AS A RATIONALE FOR PANEL DEFERENCE 29 1. A CONTRACTUAL
PERSPECTIVE 29 2. A POLICY PERSPECTIVE 30 A. PANEL DEFERENCE IN CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES 30 B. THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY 31 3. IN CONCLUSION 32
III. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PANELS AND OTHER BODIES WITHIN THE WTO 33
A. THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS 33 B.
THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN THE WTO 34 1. NO TRADITION OF SEPARATION
AND BALANCE OF POWERS 34 2. THE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT 35 C. THE SPECIAL
BODIES WITHIN THE WTO 36 1. THE SPECIAL BODIES WITH A QUASI-JUDICIAL
FUNCTION 36 2. THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BODY 37 3.
THE HORIZONTAL ALLOCATION OF POWER 38 A. PANEL DEFERENCE... 38 B. ... OR
NO PARTICULAR TREATMENT? 39 4. IN CONCLUSION 40 3 THE RATIONALES FOR
JUDICIAL RESTRAINT 41 I. JUDICIAL RESTRAINT TOWARDS LEGAL ISSUES 41 A.
METHODS OF TREATY INTERPRETATION 41 1. THE REFERENCE IN ARTICLE 3.2 OF
THE DSU 42 A. ARTICLES 31 AND 32 OF THE VCLT 42 B. THE STRUCTURE AND
MEANING 43 C. THE INFLEXIBLE AND FUNCTIONALIST CHARACTER 44 2. DE NOVO
STANDARD OF REVIEW OF LEGAL INTERPRETATIONS 46 3. DEFERENCE THROUGH
INTERPRETATION 47 B. GREATER EXPERTIZE IN LEGAL MATTERS 48 1. DOMESTIC
AUTHORITY OR WTO ADJUDICATING BODY? 49 2. THE PRINCIPLE OF LURA NOVIT
CURIA 50 C. EXCURSUS: THE ECTHR AND THE DOCTRINE OF MARGIN OF
APPRECIATION 51 1. THE DOCTRINE OF MARGIN OF APPRECIATION 51 2.
DIFFERENT STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION 52 3. CONTEXTUAL CONSTELLATIONS 53 4.
DIFFERENT INTENTIONS OF THE DRAFTERS 54 II. JUDICIAL RESTRAINT TOWARDS
FACTUAL ISSUES 55 A. FACT-FINDING METHODS AND RESOURCE CAPABILITIES 55
1. THE METHODS OF FACT-FINDING 55 CONTENTS XV 2. EXPERTIZE AND
EXPERIENCE IN FACT-FINDING 56 3. INSTITUTIONAL ADVANTAGES 57 B. THE
PRINCIPLE OF JUDICIAL EFFICIENCY 58 C. THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN
FACT-FINDING AND STANDARDS OF REVIEW 59 GATT 1947 AND THE URUGUAY ROUND
NEGOTIATIONS 60 I. STANDARDS OF REVIEW UNDER THE GATT 1947 60 A. THE
GATT 1947 LEGAL TEXTS 60 B. STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF FACTS 62 1. IN
GENERAL 62 2. IN ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING MATTERS 64 C. STANDARDS
OF REVIEW OF GATT 1947 LAW 66 D. STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF DOMESTIC LAW 67
1. PANEL JURISDICTION 67 2. DOMESTIC LAW AS A QUESTION OF FACTS} 68 E.
STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 69 F. GATT 1947 PANEL REPORTS
AND THEIR VALUE AS PRECEDENTS 71 II. THE URUGUAY ROUND NEGOTIATIONS 72
A. THE PERCEPTION OF TOO ACTIVIST GATT 1947 PANELS 72 B. PROPOSAIS FOR A
DEFERENTIAL STANDARD OF REVIEW 73 1. APPLICABLE TO TRADE REMEDY CASES 74
2. APPLICABLE TO ALL PANEL PROCEEDINGS 75 C. THE ISSUE OF STANDARD OF
REVIEW AS A DEAL-BREAKER 76 1. THE COMPROMISE 77 2. IN CONCLUSION 77
D. THE VALUE OF THE NEGOTIATION HISTORY 78 III. SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS
80 STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN THE WTO LEGAL TEXTS 82 I. ARTICLE3.2OFTHEDSU
82 II. ARTICLELLOFTHEDSU 83 A. THE CASE LAW BEFORE EC * HORMONES 84 B.
ARTICLE 11 OF THE DSU BEARS DIRECTLY ON THIS MATTER 85 C. THE MEANING
OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE DSU 86 1. NO PROMOTION OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT 87 2.
NO EQUATION OF QUESTIONS OF FACTS WITH QUESTIONS OF LAW 87 3.
CONSISTENCY WITH GATT 1947 PANEL PRACTICE 88 III. ARTICLE 17.6 OF THE AD
AGREEMENT 88 A. QUESTIONS OF FACTS 89 1. THE EXCLUSION OF DE NOVO PANEL
REVIEW 89 2. WAS THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS PROPER ? 90 3. WAS THE
EVALUATION OF THE FACTS UNBIASED AND OBJECTIVE ? 91 XVI CONTENTS B.
QUESTIONS OF LAW 93 1. INCOMPATIBLE RELATIONSHIP OF TENSION BETWEEN THE
TWO SENTENCES 93 2. IS THE SECOND SENTENCE REDUNDANT OR INUTILE? 94 3.
PANEL DEFERENCE IN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES 95 4. EXCURSUS: ANALOGY
WITH THE U.S. CHEVRON DOCTRINE? 96 IV. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARTICLE
11 OF THE DSU AND ARTICLE 17.6 OF THE AD AGREEMENT 97 A. LESS DEFERENCE
UNDER ARTICLE 11 OF THE DSU? 97 B. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 17.6 OF THE AD
AGREEMENT MUTATIS MUTANDIS} 98 C. ARTICLE 17.6 OF THE AD AGREEMENT AS
LEX SPECIALISL 99 II. STANDARDS OF REVIEW RELATING TO QUESTIONS OF FACTS
6 THE GENERAL FRAMEWORK AND THE METHOD OF FACT-FINDING 105 I. THE
GENERAL FRAMEWORK 105 A. THE SPECTRUM BETWEEN DE NOVO REVIEW AND TOTAL
DEFERENCE 105 B. THE TWO STAGES OF AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE
FACTS 106 1. THE FORMAL AN D THE SUBSTANTIVE ASPECT 106 2. THE KEY
ELEMENTS 107 II. THE INQUISITORIAL CHARACTER OF PANEL PROCEEDINGS 108 A.
FROM A CAUTIOUS AND DEFERENTIAL LANGUAGE... 109 B. ... TO THE PRINCIPLE
OF AMPLE AND EXTENSIVE AUTHORITY 110 C. THE CRUCIAL ROLE OF ARTICLE 13
OF THE DSU 111 1. NO LIMITATIONS ON THE EXERCISE OF ARTICLE 13 OF THE
DSU 111 2. IN CASES INVOLVING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE 112 3. THE RIGHT TO
CONSIDER ANTICUS CURIAE BRIEFS 113 4. THE RIGHT TO DRAW ADVERSE
INFERENCES 114 D. NO SIGNIFICANT LIMITATIONS 115 1. PURELY PRACTICAL
OBSTACLES 115 2. PRIOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A PRIMA FACIE CASE? 116 7 RAW
EVIDENCE AND FACRUAL CONCLUSIONS 117 I. PANEL REVIEW OF THE RAW
EVIDENCE 117 A. THE REQUIREMENT TO EXAMINE ALL RELEVANT FACTS 117 B. A
THOROUGH STANDARD OF REVIEW 119 1. IN GENERAL 119 2. IN CASES TURNING ON
ECONOMIC DATA 120 3. IN CASES TURNING ON SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE 121 A. RISK
ASSESSMENTS UNDER THE SPS AGREEMENT 122 B. OTHER RISK ASSESSMENTS 124 4.
IN TRADITIONAL GATT 1994 CASES 124 CONTENTS XVII C. LIMITATIONS TO A
COMPREHENSIVE STANDARD OF REVIEW 126 1. EVIDENCE WHICH WAS NOT BEFORE
THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY 126 A. CAUTIOUS APPROACH TOWARDS NON-RECORD
EVIDENCE... 126 B. ... OR EXAMINATION OF ANY EVIDENCE? 127 2. PURELY
PRACTICAL OBSTACLES 128 D. ARTICLE 17.6(I) OF THE AD AGREEMENT 129 1.
THE LIMITATION TO THE FACTS BEFORE THE NATIONAL AUTHORITY 129 2. THE
REQUIREMENT OF POSITIVE EVIDENCE AND OBJECTIVE EXAMINATION 131 3.
AN ACTIVE REVIEW OR EXAMINATION OF THE PERTINENT FACTS 131 4. NO
IMPLIED OBLIGATIONS 133 II. PANEL REVIEW OF FACTUAL CONCLUSIONS 133 A.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RAW EVIDENCE AND FACTUAL CONCLUSIONS 134 1.
THE REQUIREMENT OF AN ADEQUATE EXPLANATION 134 2. THE REQUIREMENT OF A
JUSTIFIABLE FACTUAL CONCLUSION 135 3. THE REQUIREMENT OF A PLAUSIBLE
FACTUAL CONCLUSION 135 B. NO PANEL SUBSTITUTION OF AN OWN FACTUAL
CONCLUSION 137 1. IN GENERAL 137 2. IN CASES TURNING ON ECONOMIC DATA
137 3. IN CASES TURNING ON SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE 139 A. FACTUAL
CONCLUSIONS DRAWN IN THE COURSE OF A RISK ASSESSMENT 139 B. EXCURSUS: NO
PANEL REVIEW OF A RISK MANAGEMENT DETERMINATION 141 C. ARTICLE 17.6(I)
OF THE AD AGREEMENT 142 1. REFERENCE TO PANEL REPORTS OUTSIDE
ANTI-DUMPING MATTERS 143 2. THE REQUIREMENT TO ISSUE A REASONED AND
REASONABLE EXPLANATION 144 3. THE INITIATION OF AN ANTI-DUMPING
INVESTIGATION 146 D. EXCURSUS: IMPLIED PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS 147 1.
IMPLIED PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS IN EC * HORMONES 147 2. INCONSISTENT
PANEL AND APPELLATE BODY PRACTICE 148 MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS 150 I. THE
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LOWER INSTANCE 150 A. DOMESTIC AUTHORITIES 151 1.
IN GENERAL 151 2. IN TRADE REMEDY CASES 152 XVIII CONTENTS B. SPECIAL
BODIES WITHIN THE WTO 152 1. FACTUAL FINDINGS BY THE TEXTILES MONITORING
BODY 153 A. PANEL APPROVAL OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT? 153 B. NO PANEL
DEFERENCE IN PRACTICE 154 2. FACTUAL FINDINGS BY THE COMMITTEE ON
BALANCE-OF-PAYMENTS RESTRICTIONS 154 A. PANEL REJECTION OF JUDICIAL
RESTRAINT 154 B. APPELLATE BODY CONFIRMATION 155 3. IN CONCLUSION 156
II. THE APPELLATE BODY AND QUESTIONS OF FACTS 157 A. ARTICLE 17.6 OF THE
DSU 157 B. AN EGREGIOUS ERROR CALLING INTO QUESTION A PANEL S GOOD
FAITH 158 1. THE CRITERIA PURSUANT TO EC* HORMONES 158 2. TOO STRINGENT
A SCOPE OF APPELLATE REVIEW 159 3. NO FURTHER CLARIFICATION OF THE
PROPER STANDARD OF REVIEW 161 C. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PANELS WIDE
DISCRETIONARY POWER 162 D. AN UNREASONED OR INADEQUATE EXPLANATION 163
1. THE CRITERIA PURSUANT TO US * LAMB MEAT 163 2. DEFINITIVE DEPARTURE
FROM THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED IN EC * HORMONES 164 E. IN CONCLUSION 165
III. EXCURSUS : THE ISSUE OF BUERDEN OF PROOF 166 A. A CONCEPTUAL
DEFINITION 166 1. THE CONCEPT OF A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF INCONSISTENCY 167
2. THE NOTION OF STANDARD OF PROOF 167 B. THE DELIMITATION FROM
STANDARDS OF REVIEW 169 III. STANDARDS OF REVIEW RELATING TO QUESTIONS
OF LAW 9 WTO LAW 173 I. ARTICLE 11 OF THE DSU 173 A. THE CORRECT
INTERPRETATION 174 B. THE POLICY OF FUELL DE NOVO REVIEW 174 1. TOWARDS
MEMBERS AUTHORITIES 174 2. TOWARDS SPECIAL BODIES WITHIN THE WTO 175 A.
EQUIVOCAL THEORETICAL STATEMENTS 175 B. THE CLARIFICATION BY THE ACTUAL
APPROACH 176 C. NO APPELLATE BODY DEFERENCE TOWARDS PANEL REPORTS 177
II. ARTICLE 17.6(II) OF THE AD AGREEMENT 178 A. THE RELUCTANCE TO
CLARIFY THE MEANING 178 B. THE DETERMINATION OF PERMISSIBLE
INTERPRETATIONS 180 CONTENTS XIX C. NO CASE OF TWO PERMISSIBLE
INTERPRETATIONS 181 III. DEFERENCE THROUGH INTERPRETATION 182 IV.
EXCURSUS: SOURCES OF INFORMED INTERPRETATION 184 A. THE SIGNIFICANCE 184
B. THE SOURCES 185 1. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES 185 2. ACADEMIC WRITINGS
185 3. ARTICLE 13 OF THE DSU AND ATNICUS CURIAE BRIEFS 186 10 DOMESTIC
LAW 188 I. INTRODUCTION: JURISDICTION TO REVIEW DOMESTIC LAW 188 A. THE
WTO LEGAL TEXTS 188 B. PANEL AND APPELLATE BODY PRACTICE 189 C. THE
DISTINCTION BETWEEN MANDATORY AND DISCRETIONARY LEGISLATION 190 II. THE
CASE LAW CONCERNING STANDARDS OF REVIEW 191 A. INDIA * PATENT: A
DETAILED EXAMINATION OF DOMESTIC LAW 191 1. PANEL REPORT 191 2.
APPELLATE BODY REPORT 192 B. US*SECTIONS 301-310: FACTUAL ELEMENTS 194
C. THE CONFIRMATION OF DEFERENCE 196 1. CANADA * PHARTNACEUTICAL
PRODUCTS 196 2. US*ANTI-DUMPING ACT OF1916 197 D. US * OMNIBUS
APPROPRIATIONS ACT: EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE 199 III. CONCLUDING SUMMARY
200 A. THE QUALIFIKATION OF DOMESTIC LAW 200 1. AS A QUESTION OF FACTS
200 2. AS EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE 202 A. APPELLATE BODY JURISDICTION 202
B. AS A QUESTION OF LAW? 203 B. PANEL DEFERENCE 204 1. ATHOROUGH REVIEW
OF THE RAW EVIDENCE 204 2. NO DE NOVO STANDARD OF REVIEW 205 C. IN
CONCLUSION 205 11 INTERNATIONAL LAW 207 I. INTRODUCTION: JURISDICTION TO
REVIEW INTERNATIONAL LAW 207 A. THE WTO LEGAL TEXTS 207 B. PANEL AND
APPELLATE BODY PRACTICE 209 C. THE CATEGORIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
209 II. INTERNATIONAL LAW REFERRED TO IN THE WTO LEGAL TEXTS 210 A. THE
STATUS IN THE WTO LEGAL SYSTEM 210 B. THE CASE LAW CONCERNING STANDARDS
OF REVIEW 211 XX CONTENTS 1. INTERNATIONAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
CONVENTIONS 211 A. FACTUAL INFORMATION FROM THE WIPO 211 B. THE
RELEVANCE OF ARTICLES 31 AND 32 OF THE VCLT 212 C. SEEKING THE CORRECT
INTERPRETATION 213 2. ARTICLES 31 AND 32 OF THE VCLT 213 3. THE FOURTH
LOME CONVENTION 214 III. GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL
LAW 216 A. THE STATUS IN THE WTO LEGAL SYSTEM 216 B. THE CASE LAW
CONCERNING STANDARDS OF REVIEW 217 RV. OTHER INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
218 A. THE STATUS IN THE WTO LEGAL SYSTEM 218 B. THE CASE LAW CONCERNING
STANDARDS OF REVIEW 220 1. THE OILSEEDS AGREEMENT 220 2. THE HARMONIZED
COMMODITY AND CODING SYSTEM 221 V. CONCLUDING SUMMARY 222 A. A GENERALLY
COMPREHENSIVE STANDARD OF REVIEW 222 1. NO DEFERENCE TOWARDS THE PARTIES
222 2. THE RELEVANCE OF THE LEGAL PRACTICE 222 3. THE IRRELEVANCE OF THE
NATURE OF THE LEGAL INSTRUMENT 223 A. EXPLICIT REFERENCE IN THE WTO
LEGAL TEXTS OR NOT 223 B. LIMITED IN TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP AND SYSTEMIC
SIGNIFICANCE OR NOT 224 B. THE QUALIFIKATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 224 1.
THE CRITERIA 225 2. SYSTEMICALLY IRRELEVANT BILATERAL TREATIES 226 A. AS
A QUESTION OF FACTS 226 B. PANEL DEFERENCE 227 3. GENERAL INTERNATIONAL
LAW AND SYSTEMICALLY SIGNIFICANT MULTILATERAL TREATIES 227 A. AS A
QUESTION OF LAW 228 B. DE NOVO STANDARD OF REVIEW 228 C. IN CONCLUSION
229 CONCLUDING SUMMARY I. SUMMARY OF RESULTS 233 II. EPILOGUE 239
BIBLIOGRAPHY 245 TABLE OF WTO REPORTS 263 TABLE OF GATT 1947 REPORTS 267
INDEX 269
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Oesch, Matthias 1972- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1041763441 |
| author_facet | Oesch, Matthias 1972- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Oesch, Matthias 1972- |
| author_variant | m o mo |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV019354031 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K4610 |
| callnumber-raw | K4610 |
| callnumber-search | K4610 |
| callnumber-sort | K 44610 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PR 2353 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)53155468 (DE-599)BVBBV019354031 |
| dewey-full | 341.754 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.754 |
| dewey-search | 341.754 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.754 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1. publ. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02147nam a2200553 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV019354031</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20091118 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">040803s2003 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780199268924</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-926892-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0199268924</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-926892-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)53155468</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV019354031</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K4610</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.754</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2353</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139576:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oesch, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="d">1972-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1041763441</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution</subfield><subfield code="c">Matthias Oesch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VI, 276 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Organisation mondiale du commerce</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">World Trade Organization.</subfield><subfield code="b">Appellate Body</subfield><subfield code="v">Rules and practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">World Trade Organization</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2145784-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Commerce extérieur - Réglementation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationale arbitrage</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Règlement de conflits</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">World Trade Organization</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration agreements, Commercial</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration and award, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dispute resolution (Law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Foreign trade regulation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitglied</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114609-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Maßnahme</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4200802-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Prüfung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047609-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">World Trade Organization</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)2145784-0</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Mitglied</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114609-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Maßnahme</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4200802-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Prüfung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047609-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=012818022&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-012818022</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV019354031 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T19:58:20Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780199268924 0199268924 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-012818022 |
| oclc_num | 53155468 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-384 DE-M382 DE-11 |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-M382 DE-11 |
| physical | VI, 276 S. |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publishDateSearch | 2003 |
| publishDateSort | 2003 |
| publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Oesch, Matthias 1972- Verfasser (DE-588)1041763441 aut Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution Matthias Oesch 1. publ. Oxford [u.a.] Oxford Univ. Press 2003 VI, 276 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Organisation mondiale du commerce World Trade Organization. Appellate Body Rules and practice World Trade Organization (DE-588)2145784-0 gnd rswk-swf Commerce extérieur - Réglementation Internationale arbitrage gtt Règlement de conflits World Trade Organization gtt Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Dispute resolution (Law) Foreign trade regulation Mitglied (DE-588)4114609-8 gnd rswk-swf Maßnahme (DE-588)4200802-5 gnd rswk-swf Prüfung (DE-588)4047609-1 gnd rswk-swf World Trade Organization (DE-588)2145784-0 b Mitglied (DE-588)4114609-8 s Maßnahme (DE-588)4200802-5 s Prüfung (DE-588)4047609-1 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=012818022&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Oesch, Matthias 1972- Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution Organisation mondiale du commerce World Trade Organization. Appellate Body Rules and practice World Trade Organization (DE-588)2145784-0 gnd Commerce extérieur - Réglementation Internationale arbitrage gtt Règlement de conflits World Trade Organization gtt Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Dispute resolution (Law) Foreign trade regulation Mitglied (DE-588)4114609-8 gnd Maßnahme (DE-588)4200802-5 gnd Prüfung (DE-588)4047609-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)2145784-0 (DE-588)4114609-8 (DE-588)4200802-5 (DE-588)4047609-1 |
| title | Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution |
| title_auth | Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution |
| title_exact_search | Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution |
| title_full | Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution Matthias Oesch |
| title_fullStr | Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution Matthias Oesch |
| title_full_unstemmed | Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution Matthias Oesch |
| title_short | Standards of review in WTO dispute resolution |
| title_sort | standards of review in wto dispute resolution |
| topic | Organisation mondiale du commerce World Trade Organization. Appellate Body Rules and practice World Trade Organization (DE-588)2145784-0 gnd Commerce extérieur - Réglementation Internationale arbitrage gtt Règlement de conflits World Trade Organization gtt Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Dispute resolution (Law) Foreign trade regulation Mitglied (DE-588)4114609-8 gnd Maßnahme (DE-588)4200802-5 gnd Prüfung (DE-588)4047609-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Organisation mondiale du commerce World Trade Organization. Appellate Body Rules and practice World Trade Organization Commerce extérieur - Réglementation Internationale arbitrage Règlement de conflits Arbitration agreements, Commercial Arbitration and award, International Dispute resolution (Law) Foreign trade regulation Mitglied Maßnahme Prüfung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=012818022&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT oeschmatthias standardsofreviewinwtodisputeresolution |