How we act: causes, reasons, and intentions
"How We Act presents a compelling picture of human action as part of the natural causal order. Berent Enc eschews appeal to special capacities supposedly unique to rational agents, such as agent causation and irreducible acts of volition, and by appealing to analogous positions in epistemology...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Clarendon Press [u.a.]
2003
|
Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | "How We Act presents a compelling picture of human action as part of the natural causal order. Berent Enc eschews appeal to special capacities supposedly unique to rational agents, such as agent causation and irreducible acts of volition, and by appealing to analogous positions in epistemology and the theory of perception, shows why its is a mistake to subscribe to such capacities." "Although aspects of the causal theory of action have been adopted and defended by many empiricist philosophers, none has given as sustained and as thorough a defence as Enc offers in this book. His defence begins with a foundationalist definition of action that rests on a theory of basic acts, conceived here as derived from empirical studies of animal behaviour. Basic acts are complex units that agents acquire as part of their repertoire of things they can readily do - things with which practical syllogisms end." "Having set out the details of his causal theory, Enc proceeds to propose solutions for two remaining problems. The first is a general and a complete solution to the problem of deviant causal chains. The second is a solution to the problem of the disappearance of the agent. A causal theory normally presents the agent as a mere conduit for causal action. The agent seems to lose its active role. Enc addresses this problem by contrasting hard-wired and conditioned behaviour with behaviour that is the result of deliberation. He provides a purely causal model of deliberation." "How We Act is careful to allay fears that its causal theory threatens our common-sense notion that we act of our own free will, but it remains highly provocative and original. Anyone working on human action, in philosophy and also in cognitive and behavioural psychology, will find much to stimulate them here."--BOOK JACKET. |
Beschreibung: | XII, 252 S. |
ISBN: | 0199256020 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV017500128 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20050919 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 030916s2003 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0199256020 |9 0-19-925602-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)52567238 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV017500128 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-19 | ||
050 | 0 | |a B105.A35 | |
082 | 0 | |a 128/.4 |2 22 | |
084 | |a CC 6000 |0 (DE-625)17650: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ȩnc, Berent |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How we act |b causes, reasons, and intentions |c Berent Ȩnc |
250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Clarendon Press [u.a.] |c 2003 | |
300 | |a XII, 252 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 1 | |a "How We Act presents a compelling picture of human action as part of the natural causal order. Berent Enc eschews appeal to special capacities supposedly unique to rational agents, such as agent causation and irreducible acts of volition, and by appealing to analogous positions in epistemology and the theory of perception, shows why its is a mistake to subscribe to such capacities." "Although aspects of the causal theory of action have been adopted and defended by many empiricist philosophers, none has given as sustained and as thorough a defence as Enc offers in this book. His defence begins with a foundationalist definition of action that rests on a theory of basic acts, conceived here as derived from empirical studies of animal behaviour. Basic acts are complex units that agents acquire as part of their repertoire of things they can readily do - things with which practical syllogisms end." "Having set out the details of his causal theory, Enc proceeds to propose solutions for two remaining problems. The first is a general and a complete solution to the problem of deviant causal chains. The second is a solution to the problem of the disappearance of the agent. A causal theory normally presents the agent as a mere conduit for causal action. The agent seems to lose its active role. Enc addresses this problem by contrasting hard-wired and conditioned behaviour with behaviour that is the result of deliberation. He provides a purely causal model of deliberation." "How We Act is careful to allay fears that its causal theory threatens our common-sense notion that we act of our own free will, but it remains highly provocative and original. Anyone working on human action, in philosophy and also in cognitive and behavioural psychology, will find much to stimulate them here."--BOOK JACKET. | |
650 | 4 | |a Action (Philosophie) | |
650 | 4 | |a Causalité | |
650 | 7 | |a Handelingstheorie |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Prise de décision | |
650 | 4 | |a Raisonnement | |
650 | 4 | |a Volonté | |
650 | 4 | |a Act (Philosophy) | |
650 | 4 | |a Causation | |
650 | 4 | |a Decision making | |
650 | 4 | |a Reasoning | |
650 | 4 | |a Will | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Handlungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4113844-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Handlungstheorie |0 (DE-588)4113844-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010543921 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804130298266386432 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Ȩnc, Berent |
author_facet | Ȩnc, Berent |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Ȩnc, Berent |
author_variant | b e be |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV017500128 |
callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-label | B105 |
callnumber-raw | B105.A35 |
callnumber-search | B105.A35 |
callnumber-sort | B 3105 A35 |
callnumber-subject | B - Philosophy |
classification_rvk | CC 6000 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)52567238 (DE-599)BVBBV017500128 |
dewey-full | 128/.4 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 128 - Humankind |
dewey-raw | 128/.4 |
dewey-search | 128/.4 |
dewey-sort | 3128 14 |
dewey-tens | 120 - Epistemology, causation, humankind |
discipline | Philosophie |
edition | 1. publ. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03277nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV017500128</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20050919 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">030916s2003 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0199256020</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-925602-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)52567238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV017500128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B105.A35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">128/.4</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 6000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17650:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ȩnc, Berent</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How we act</subfield><subfield code="b">causes, reasons, and intentions</subfield><subfield code="c">Berent Ȩnc</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Clarendon Press [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XII, 252 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"How We Act presents a compelling picture of human action as part of the natural causal order. Berent Enc eschews appeal to special capacities supposedly unique to rational agents, such as agent causation and irreducible acts of volition, and by appealing to analogous positions in epistemology and the theory of perception, shows why its is a mistake to subscribe to such capacities." "Although aspects of the causal theory of action have been adopted and defended by many empiricist philosophers, none has given as sustained and as thorough a defence as Enc offers in this book. His defence begins with a foundationalist definition of action that rests on a theory of basic acts, conceived here as derived from empirical studies of animal behaviour. Basic acts are complex units that agents acquire as part of their repertoire of things they can readily do - things with which practical syllogisms end." "Having set out the details of his causal theory, Enc proceeds to propose solutions for two remaining problems. The first is a general and a complete solution to the problem of deviant causal chains. The second is a solution to the problem of the disappearance of the agent. A causal theory normally presents the agent as a mere conduit for causal action. The agent seems to lose its active role. Enc addresses this problem by contrasting hard-wired and conditioned behaviour with behaviour that is the result of deliberation. He provides a purely causal model of deliberation." "How We Act is careful to allay fears that its causal theory threatens our common-sense notion that we act of our own free will, but it remains highly provocative and original. Anyone working on human action, in philosophy and also in cognitive and behavioural psychology, will find much to stimulate them here."--BOOK JACKET.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Action (Philosophie)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Causalité</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Handelingstheorie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prise de décision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Raisonnement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Volonté</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Act (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Causation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Decision making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Will</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Handlungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113844-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Handlungstheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113844-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010543921</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV017500128 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T19:18:48Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0199256020 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010543921 |
oclc_num | 52567238 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | XII, 252 S. |
publishDate | 2003 |
publishDateSearch | 2003 |
publishDateSort | 2003 |
publisher | Clarendon Press [u.a.] |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Ȩnc, Berent Verfasser aut How we act causes, reasons, and intentions Berent Ȩnc 1. publ. Oxford [u.a.] Clarendon Press [u.a.] 2003 XII, 252 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "How We Act presents a compelling picture of human action as part of the natural causal order. Berent Enc eschews appeal to special capacities supposedly unique to rational agents, such as agent causation and irreducible acts of volition, and by appealing to analogous positions in epistemology and the theory of perception, shows why its is a mistake to subscribe to such capacities." "Although aspects of the causal theory of action have been adopted and defended by many empiricist philosophers, none has given as sustained and as thorough a defence as Enc offers in this book. His defence begins with a foundationalist definition of action that rests on a theory of basic acts, conceived here as derived from empirical studies of animal behaviour. Basic acts are complex units that agents acquire as part of their repertoire of things they can readily do - things with which practical syllogisms end." "Having set out the details of his causal theory, Enc proceeds to propose solutions for two remaining problems. The first is a general and a complete solution to the problem of deviant causal chains. The second is a solution to the problem of the disappearance of the agent. A causal theory normally presents the agent as a mere conduit for causal action. The agent seems to lose its active role. Enc addresses this problem by contrasting hard-wired and conditioned behaviour with behaviour that is the result of deliberation. He provides a purely causal model of deliberation." "How We Act is careful to allay fears that its causal theory threatens our common-sense notion that we act of our own free will, but it remains highly provocative and original. Anyone working on human action, in philosophy and also in cognitive and behavioural psychology, will find much to stimulate them here."--BOOK JACKET. Action (Philosophie) Causalité Handelingstheorie gtt Prise de décision Raisonnement Volonté Act (Philosophy) Causation Decision making Reasoning Will Handlungstheorie (DE-588)4113844-2 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Handlungstheorie (DE-588)4113844-2 s Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s DE-604 |
spellingShingle | Ȩnc, Berent How we act causes, reasons, and intentions Action (Philosophie) Causalité Handelingstheorie gtt Prise de décision Raisonnement Volonté Act (Philosophy) Causation Decision making Reasoning Will Handlungstheorie (DE-588)4113844-2 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4113844-2 (DE-588)4045791-6 |
title | How we act causes, reasons, and intentions |
title_auth | How we act causes, reasons, and intentions |
title_exact_search | How we act causes, reasons, and intentions |
title_full | How we act causes, reasons, and intentions Berent Ȩnc |
title_fullStr | How we act causes, reasons, and intentions Berent Ȩnc |
title_full_unstemmed | How we act causes, reasons, and intentions Berent Ȩnc |
title_short | How we act |
title_sort | how we act causes reasons and intentions |
title_sub | causes, reasons, and intentions |
topic | Action (Philosophie) Causalité Handelingstheorie gtt Prise de décision Raisonnement Volonté Act (Philosophy) Causation Decision making Reasoning Will Handlungstheorie (DE-588)4113844-2 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Action (Philosophie) Causalité Handelingstheorie Prise de décision Raisonnement Volonté Act (Philosophy) Causation Decision making Reasoning Will Handlungstheorie Philosophie |
work_keys_str_mv | AT encberent howweactcausesreasonsandintentions |