Manifestations of genericity:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York [u.a.]
Routledge
2003
|
Schriftenreihe: | Outstanding dissertations in linguistics
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke |
Beschreibung: | XXVI, 323 S. |
ISBN: | 0415967775 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV017109399 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20150202 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 030429s2003 xxu m||| 00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 2003009171 | ||
020 | |a 0415967775 |9 0-415-96777-5 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)52109403 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV017109399 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-473 | ||
050 | 0 | |a P295 | |
082 | 0 | |a 415 |2 21 | |
084 | |a HF 290 |0 (DE-625)48837: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Greenberg, Yael |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Manifestations of genericity |c by Yael Greenberg |
264 | 1 | |a New York [u.a.] |b Routledge |c 2003 | |
300 | |a XXVI, 323 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Outstanding dissertations in linguistics | |
500 | |a Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke | ||
502 | |a Zugl: Univ., Diss., Bar-Ilan Univ., 2002 | ||
650 | 7 | |a Generalisatie |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Générique (Linguistique) | |
650 | 4 | |a Phrase (Linguistique) | |
650 | 4 | |a Pragmatique | |
650 | 4 | |a Syntaxe | |
650 | 4 | |a Sémantique | |
650 | 4 | |a Grammatik | |
650 | 4 | |a Genericalness (Linguistics) | |
650 | 4 | |a Grammar, Comparative and general |x Sentences | |
650 | 4 | |a Grammar, Comparative and general |x Syntax | |
650 | 4 | |a Pragmatics | |
650 | 4 | |a Semantics | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Generische Aussage |0 (DE-588)4156612-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Formale Semantik |0 (DE-588)4122144-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Generische Aussage |0 (DE-588)4156612-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Formale Semantik |0 (DE-588)4122144-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m HEBIS Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010317015&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010317015 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804129984734822400 |
---|---|
adam_text | OUTSTANDING DISSERTATIONS
IN LINGUISTICS
Edited by
Laurence Horn
Yale University
A ROUTLEDGE SERIES
Contents
PREFACE xxi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XXV
CHAPTER 1
COMPARING SENTENCES WITH GENERICALLY INTERPRETED
INDEFINITE SINGULAR (IS) AND BARE PLURAL (BP) SUBJECTS:
THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH AND ITS PROBLEMS 3
1 Introduction 3
2 A brief review of central genericity phenomena and analyses 6
2 1 Genericity in English 6
2 2 The I (characteristic) / D (kind) genericity distinction 7
2 3 Relevance of the characteristic / kind distinction to the IS
/ BP distinction 9
2 4 The Basic Semantic Structure of Characteristic (I-)
Generics 11
2 5 The semantics of the generic operator - the modal
approach 14
251 Tolerance of exceptions, law likeness, and
counterfactual support of characteristic generics 14
vc
jc Contents
252 Kratzer s (1981) analysis of nongeneric modal verbs
and its application to the semantics of Gen 17
2 6 Summary 20
3 Unexpected differences between minimal pairs of IS and BP
sentences 20
3 1 Differences between IS and BP sentences in
temporally modified sentences 21
3 2 Differences in the level of law-likeness and type of
rules expressed by IS and BP sentences 26
321 The original intuition 26
322 Problems with the original intuition 28
3 3 Unexpected differences between minimal pairs of IS and
BP sentences with subjects expressing extremely
unnatural classes 29
3 4 Unexpected differences between minimal pairs of IS and
BP sentences with VPs expressing Extremely
Unconnected Properties or extremely unconnected
properties 33
3 5 The different effect of the presence/absence of contextual
support on the felicity of BP and IS sentences 35
351 Out of the blue vs contextually supported IS and
BP sentences 35
352 Contextual support does not always help: IS
sentences in pure inductive scenarios 36
3 6 IS and BP sentences which do not differ so much 38
4 Parallels between the IS/ BP distinction in temporally
restricted and classic generic constructions 40
5 The basic intuition 42
5 1 Carlson s (1995) distinction between the inductive and
the rules and regulations approaches to (I-) genericity 42
5 2 The intuitive underlying difference between IS and BP
sentences 45
6 An outline of this work 46
Contents xi
CHAPTER 2
IN VIRTUE OF GENERALIZATIONS, AND THE SEMANTICS AND
PRAGMATICS OF IS SENTENCES 49
1 Introduction 49
1 1 Basic Characteristics of IS Sentences 49
1 2 The basic intuition 52
1 3 The Direction of Formalization: in virtue o f properties
restricting the accessibility relation of IS sentences 54
1 4 The pragmatic aspects in the semantics of IS sentences
and their formalization 56
2 Ability of previous theories to account for the data 58
2 1 Krifka (1987): modality vs nonmodality 58
2 2 Unspecified modal base of I- generics - Krifka et al
(1995) and Krifka (1995) 59
2 3 Cohen (2001): IS sentences as expressing rules 61
3 Chierchia s (1995) and Brennan s (1993) theories: a
formalization of the in virtue o f intuition 64
3 1 Chierchia (1995): felicity conditions restricting the
accessibility relation 65
3 2 Brennan (1993): an accessibility relation keyed to the
properties of the subject 68
321 Data concerning root modals 68
322 Brennan s intuition 69
323 The formalization 70
4 Application of Brennan s ideas to the requirements on the
accessibility relation of IS sentences 72
4 1 Basic data and intuition 72
4 2 Accessible wrta property: subset, and not
membership relationship 73
4 3 The role of the world of evaluation in choosing the
possible in virtue o f properties 75
431 Contextual restrictions on the choice of the in
virtue o f property 75
xii Contents
432 Brennan s suggestion for restricting the set of in
virtue o f properties 77
433 An intuitive characterization of associated
properties 78
434 Formal characterization of associated properties 79
4 4 Integrating the definition of associated properties into
the truth conditions of IS sentences 81
4 5 The problem of exceptions , 82
5 Advantages , 85
5 1 Normative, legal, epistemic, etc , flavors of IS
sentences 85
5 2 Comparing IS sentences and nongeneric universal
sentences with overt deontic modal verbs 87
5 3 High level of law-likeness: the analytic flavor of IS
sentences 90
5 4 IS sentences with subjects denoting extremely unnatural
classes 92
541 Basic infelicity 92
542 Contextual support for infelicitous IS sentences 95
543 Inductive contexts 97
544 Linguistically associated properties as improving
the felicity of IS sentences 98
6 An additional contextual requirement on IS sentences 100
6 1 The problem: association of AS with AP is not enough 100
6 2 The intuition: A second contextual requirement on the AS
property 102
6 3 Formalizing the intuition 104
631 The extensional disjunction 104
632 Problems with the extensional disjunction 106
633A Good possibility operator over the disjunction 108
6331 The intuition 108
6332 Defining the right kind of good possibility 109
6 4 Further motivations for the second presuppositional
requirement on the AS property 112
641 An apparently better alternative: limiting AQ and not
AS 112
Contents xiii
642 Triggering of the presupposition 114
643A more efficient evaluation process 119
7 Conclusion and summary 121
CHAPTER 3
DESCRIPTIVE GENERALIZATIONS, AND THE SEMANTICS AND
PRAGMATICS OF DESCRIPTIVE BP SENTENCES 125
1 Introduction 125
1 1 Basic properties of BP, as opposed to IS sentences 126
1 2 Descriptive BP sentences: the intuition and the direction
of formalization 128
121 The intuition 128
122 Direction of formalization 129
123 Exceptions to descriptive BP sentences 130
124 Basic modality / intensionality of descriptive BP
sentences 130
125 The nature of modality / intensionality of descriptive
BP sentences 131
126 Basic semantic structure, and structure of this
chapter 132
2 A closer look at descriptive BP sentences: entailments and
predictions 134
2 1 Truth of the universal statement in the similar worlds 134
211 The data and the intuition 134
212 The formalization: a Lewis-style definition of
maximally similar worlds 137
2 2 Truth of the universal statement in the normal futures 139
221 The data and the intuition 139
222 The formalization: evaluation in world-interval pairs 140
223 The problem of natural, expected, changes, and its
solution 143
2 3 Truth of the universal statement in the actual world:
present and past 146
xiv Contents
24A unified definition of relevant circumstances and unified
truth conditions for descriptive BP sentences 148
3 Accounting for the basic properties of descriptive BP
sentences 152
3 1 Descriptive BP sentences as freely expressing
unreasonable generalizations 153
3 2 Unified flavor of descriptive BP sentences 154
3 3 Descriptive BP sentences as expressing a low degree of
law-likeness 155
4 Advantages and an apparent problem with the
underspecification of the superintend / 156
4 1 Advantages 156
4 2 An apparent problem 159
5 The existence presupposition of Descriptive BP sentences 160
5 1 The existence requirement: The basic data 161
5 2 The existence requirement is a presupposition 164
5 3 Triggering the presupposition 165
531 The conventionally triggered existence
presupposition 166
532A mismatch (between the conventionally triggered
and the real existence presupposition), wrt the
relevant interval involved, and its resolution 167
5321 The mismatch 167
5322A resolution of the mismatch: triggering
existence at both edges of (instead of at) the
superinterval / 169
533A mismatch (between the conventionally triggered
and the real existence presupposition), concerning
the relevant world involved, and its resolution 171
5331 The mismatch 171
5332A resolution of the mismatch: triggering
presupposed existence in the actual world 172
5 4 Existence presuppositions of IS sentences 175
541 Existence presuppositions of IS sentences - basic
data 175
542 What triggers existence in the actual world with
epistemic IS sentences 178
Contents xv
543 The existence presupposition with deontic IS
sentences 180
544 Two further supporting facts 180
5441 The first support: defeasibility of the
existence presupposition with epistemic IS
sentences 180
5442 The second supporting fact: a difference
between epistemic IS and Descriptive BP
sentences concerning existence of relevant
situations in the actual world 181
6 The enough presupposition of Descriptive BP sentences and
the relationship between descriptive generics and the process
of inductive inference 183
6 1 The enough implication: basic data and intuition 184
6 2 The enough implication is a conversationally triggered
presupposition 185
6 3 The temporal asymmetry and variability of the enough
presupposition 189
6 4 Inductive inferences and descriptive generalizations 192
6 5 Back to the enough presupposition 193
6 6 An apparent counterexample: more cases where enough
is very few 195
7 Conclusion and summary 197
CHAPTER 4
TOLERANCE OF EXCEPTIONAL AND IRRELEVANT ENTITIES
WITH IS AND DESCRIPTIVE BP SENTENCES 201
1 Introduction 201
2 The basic data: similarities in the way IS and descriptive BP
sentences tolerate exceptional and irrelevant entities 202
3 Capturing the similarities: a Kadmon amp; Landman-style
domain vague restriction on the generic quantifier 206
xvi Contents
3 1 Kadmon and Landman s 1993 theory of generics 206
3 2 Applying K amp;L s suggestion to the truth conditions of IS
and descriptive BP sentences 208
321A vague restriction on the set of individuals 208
322A vague restriction also on the set of situations 211
3 3 Advantages of the new mechanism for tolerating
exceptional and irrelevant entities 213
3 4 Shortcomings of the present mechanism for tolerating
exceptions 214
341 Abnormality of the legitimate exceptions is not
captured 215
342A (newly observed) difference between IS and
descriptive BP sentences is not captured 215
4 Why are descriptive BP and IS sentences different w r t
characterizing exceptions? 218
4 1 The intuition 218
4 2 Empirical support for the intuition: IS sentences where the
characterization of legitimate exceptions seems
impossible 219
4 3 The direction of formalization 223
5 Formalizing the normality wrt AS requirement on the
vague restriction of IS sentences 226
5 1 The further pragmatic requirement on the vague
restriction on the P set of individuals 226
5 2 The further pragmatic requirement on the vague
restriction on the set of situations 229
5 3 IS sentences with an even more vague restriction 232
6 Formalizing normality with the vague restriction of
descriptive BP sentences 233
6 1 The further pragmatic requirement on the vague
restriction on the set of individuals 233
6 2 The further restriction on the vague restriction on the set
of situations 237
7 Conclusion 239
Contents xvii
CHAPTER 5
TEMPORALLY RESTRICTED IS AND BP SENTENCES 241
1 Introduction 241
2 Temporally restricted generics 242
2 1 The basic data 242
2 2 Differences between BP and IS sentences 243
3 Real generic or functional? 248
3 1 Condoravdi s (1993,1997) functional reading 248
3 2 Condoravdi s conditions for nongenericity are relevant for
temporally restricted sentences 250
3 3 Examining Condoravdi s conditions for nongenericity 251
3 4 Positive indications for genericity 254
4 A closer examination of the BP/IS distinction in temporally
restricted sentences 257
4 1 Two readings of the temporal adverbial 258
42A descriptive generalization 261
5 How can existing theories of genericity handle the descriptive
generalization? 263
5 1 Existing theories on the restriction on IS sentences Or,
why are characteristic (I-) genericity and episodicity
mutually exclusive? 263
511 Binding of the situation variable, and similarity of
Gen with overt Q-adverbs as explaining the
behavior of IS sentences 264
512 Modality / law-likeness as explaining the behavior
of IS sentences 267
5 2 Genericity theories on the behavior of BP sentences: why
can BP sentences freely express episodic genericity? 268
6 Temporally restricted IS and BP sentences: the solution 271
jcvtii Contents
6 1 Similarities between the behavior of IS and BP sentences
in temporally restricted and classical generic sentences 271
6 2 The intuition: IS sentences with indexically interpreted
temporal adverbials express unreasonable
generalizations 274
6 3 Truth conditions of temporally restricted present tense IS
and BP sentences 276
6 4 IS sentences with the indexical and functional
readings of the temporal adverbials 279
641 The reasonable causation presupposition with
temporally restricted IS sentences 279
642 Support for the proposed solution 283
6 5 Why BP sentences are compatible with the default,
indexical reading of the adverbial 285
6 6 Actual times, actual worlds and nonaccidentalness: on the
double nature of temporally restricted BP sentences 286
7 Conclusion 287
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION AND DIRECTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH 289
1 Introduction 289
2 A brief summary of the semantics and pragmatics of IS and
BP sentences 290
2 1 Similarities between IS and BP sentences 290
2 2 The differences between IS and descriptive BP sentences 292
221 Accessibility relations 292
222 Presuppositions 294
2 3 Apparent interactions between in virtue o f and
descriptive generalizations 297
3 Directions for further research: why do IS and BP sentences
differ in the availability of accessibility relation? 298
3 1 The problem 298
3 2 The semantic difference between IS and BP noun phrases 298
3 3 An apparent problem: can BP NPs corresponding to
extremely unnatural classes be kind referring as well? 300
Contents xix
3 4 The interpretation of characterizing sentences with BP
subjects 303
341 Chierchia s (1998) and Krifka et al s (1995)
suggestions 303
342 Similarities between characterizing sentences with
BP and proper-name subjects 304
343 Two formal options for the representation of
characterizing BP sentences 307
3431 Option A: a Delfitto (1996)-style
representation 307
3432 Option B: a von Fintel (1994)-style
representation for BP sentences 310
4 Conclusion 312
BIBLIOGRAPHY 315
INDEX 321
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Greenberg, Yael |
author_facet | Greenberg, Yael |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Greenberg, Yael |
author_variant | y g yg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV017109399 |
callnumber-first | P - Language and Literature |
callnumber-label | P295 |
callnumber-raw | P295 |
callnumber-search | P295 |
callnumber-sort | P 3295 |
callnumber-subject | P - Philology and Linguistics |
classification_rvk | HF 290 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)52109403 (DE-599)BVBBV017109399 |
dewey-full | 415 |
dewey-hundreds | 400 - Language |
dewey-ones | 415 - Grammar |
dewey-raw | 415 |
dewey-search | 415 |
dewey-sort | 3415 |
dewey-tens | 410 - Linguistics |
discipline | Sprachwissenschaft Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
format | Thesis Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02049nam a2200577zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV017109399</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150202 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">030429s2003 xxu m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2003009171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0415967775</subfield><subfield code="9">0-415-96777-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)52109403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV017109399</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">P295</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">415</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HF 290</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)48837:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Greenberg, Yael</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Manifestations of genericity</subfield><subfield code="c">by Yael Greenberg</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXVI, 323 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Outstanding dissertations in linguistics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl: Univ., Diss., Bar-Ilan Univ., 2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Generalisatie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Générique (Linguistique)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Phrase (Linguistique)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pragmatique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Syntaxe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sémantique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Grammatik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Genericalness (Linguistics)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Grammar, Comparative and general</subfield><subfield code="x">Sentences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Grammar, Comparative and general</subfield><subfield code="x">Syntax</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pragmatics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Semantics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Generische Aussage</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156612-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Formale Semantik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122144-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Generische Aussage</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4156612-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Formale Semantik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4122144-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HEBIS Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010317015&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010317015</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV017109399 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T19:13:49Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0415967775 |
language | English |
lccn | 2003009171 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010317015 |
oclc_num | 52109403 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-739 DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
owner_facet | DE-739 DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
physical | XXVI, 323 S. |
publishDate | 2003 |
publishDateSearch | 2003 |
publishDateSort | 2003 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Outstanding dissertations in linguistics |
spelling | Greenberg, Yael Verfasser aut Manifestations of genericity by Yael Greenberg New York [u.a.] Routledge 2003 XXVI, 323 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Outstanding dissertations in linguistics Hier auch später erschienene, unveränderte Nachdrucke Zugl: Univ., Diss., Bar-Ilan Univ., 2002 Generalisatie gtt Générique (Linguistique) Phrase (Linguistique) Pragmatique Syntaxe Sémantique Grammatik Genericalness (Linguistics) Grammar, Comparative and general Sentences Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax Pragmatics Semantics Generische Aussage (DE-588)4156612-9 gnd rswk-swf Formale Semantik (DE-588)4122144-8 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Generische Aussage (DE-588)4156612-9 s Formale Semantik (DE-588)4122144-8 s DE-604 HEBIS Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010317015&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Greenberg, Yael Manifestations of genericity Generalisatie gtt Générique (Linguistique) Phrase (Linguistique) Pragmatique Syntaxe Sémantique Grammatik Genericalness (Linguistics) Grammar, Comparative and general Sentences Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax Pragmatics Semantics Generische Aussage (DE-588)4156612-9 gnd Formale Semantik (DE-588)4122144-8 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4156612-9 (DE-588)4122144-8 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | Manifestations of genericity |
title_auth | Manifestations of genericity |
title_exact_search | Manifestations of genericity |
title_full | Manifestations of genericity by Yael Greenberg |
title_fullStr | Manifestations of genericity by Yael Greenberg |
title_full_unstemmed | Manifestations of genericity by Yael Greenberg |
title_short | Manifestations of genericity |
title_sort | manifestations of genericity |
topic | Generalisatie gtt Générique (Linguistique) Phrase (Linguistique) Pragmatique Syntaxe Sémantique Grammatik Genericalness (Linguistics) Grammar, Comparative and general Sentences Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax Pragmatics Semantics Generische Aussage (DE-588)4156612-9 gnd Formale Semantik (DE-588)4122144-8 gnd |
topic_facet | Generalisatie Générique (Linguistique) Phrase (Linguistique) Pragmatique Syntaxe Sémantique Grammatik Genericalness (Linguistics) Grammar, Comparative and general Sentences Grammar, Comparative and general Syntax Pragmatics Semantics Generische Aussage Formale Semantik Hochschulschrift |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010317015&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenbergyael manifestationsofgenericity |