The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English French German |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Hart
2002
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | CXXX, 595 S. |
| ISBN: | 184113323X |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV016504906 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20061218 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 030207s2002 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 184113323X |9 1-84113-323-X | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)248639322 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV016504906 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 1 | |a eng |h fre |h ger | |
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-703 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJC3795 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.4 | |
| 084 | |a PT 340 |0 (DE-625)139872: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Newton, Justin |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions |c Justin Newton |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Hart |c 2002 | |
| 300 | |a CXXX, 595 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of judicial decisions - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Court of Justice of the European Communities | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Europa | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen - Auslegung |2 idszbz | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen |2 swd | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gerichtsentscheidung | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Jurisdiction - Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Konflikt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Lugano-Übereinkommen - Auslegung |2 idszbz | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Lugano-Übereinkommen |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Auslegung |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Gerichtsentscheidung |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationaler Zivilprozess - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa |2 idsbb | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationales Privatrecht - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa |2 idsbb | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationales Privatrecht |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationales Zivilprozessrecht |2 swd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |2 swd | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Europa |2 swd | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |2 swd | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010200008&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010200008 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804129823697666048 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
UPDATES TO THIS WORK XVIII
TABLE OF CASES XXII
EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE DECISIONS ON THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION XXII
INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTING STATE CASE LAW ON THE BRUSSELS AND
LUGANO CONVENTIONS XXVI
PRE/NON-CONVENTION CASES UNDER AUTONOMOUS LAWS/BILATERAL TREATIES CV
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS CXXII
INTRODUCTION 1
ARTICLE 293 (EX ARTICLE 220) EC AND THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION AS A
COMMUNITY INSTRUMENT 3
THE FORM OF THE BRUSSELS AND LUGANO CONVENTIONS THEMSELVES 6
WHICH VERSION (IF ANY) OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION TO APPLY IN THE UNITED
KINGDOM THE APPLICABLE DATES 10
THE MECHANISMS BY WHICH A PARTICULAR VERSION (IF ANY) OF THE BRUSSELS
CONVENTION IS TO BE APPLIED IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: THE INITIATION OF
PROCEEDINGS, US PENDENS AND THE DATE A CONTRACTING STATE JUDGMENT WAS
GIVEN /RENDERED 12
(I) AS REGARDS THE UK COURTS TAKING JURISDICTION UNDER TITLE II OF
(ANY OR A PARTICULAR VERSION OF) THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 12
(II) AS REGARDS THE UK S OBLIGATION TO OBSERVE US PENDENS IN ANOTHER
CONTRACTING STATE UNDER ARTICLES 21/22/23 13
(III) AS REGARDS THE UK S OBLIGATION TO RECOGNISE/ENFORCE JUDGMENTS OF
CONTRACTING STATES UNDER TITLE III OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 13
THE PAST, AND THE LEGAL POSITION OF THE CONTRACTING STATES IN SITUATIONS
WHERE THE BRUSSELS/LUGANO CONVENTIONS DO NOT APPLY RATIONE
TEMPORIS/RATIONE TNATERIAE 14
THE FUTURE: COUNCIL REGULATION 44/2001 OF 22 DECEMBER 2000 ON
JURISDICTION AND THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL
AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS; AND THE WORK OF THE SPECIAL COMMISSION OF THE
HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW 17
VIII CONTENTS
(I) THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION (44/2001) 17
(II) THE PROJECT FOR THE HAGUE WORLDWIDE JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 21
OVERVIEW OF BRUSSELS AND LUGANO CONVENTIONS THEMSELVES 30
(I) TITLE I SCOPE 30
(II) TITLE II (A) JURISDICTIONAL PROVISIONS, (B) US ALIBI PENDENS, AND
(C) INTERIM RELIEF 33
(A) JURISDICTIONAL PROVISIONS 33
(B) US ALIBI PENDENS AND (C) INTERIM RELIEF 36
(III) TITLE III RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 36
THE AIMS OF THE CONVENTION, AND OF THIS WORK 38
1 ARTICLE 5(1) 43
INTRODUCTION 43
1.1 *IN MATTERS RELATING TO A CONTRACT 47
1.1.1 THE DIFFERENT LANGUAGE VERSIONS OF ARTICLE 5(1) AND MATTERS
RELATING TO A CONTRACT 54
1.1.2 MATTERS RELATING TO A CONTRACT 58
1.1.3 PRE-CONTRACTUAL DUTIES 60
1.1.4 IN MATTERS RELATING TO* AND CULPA IN CONTRAHENDO CLAIMS 62
1.1.5 THE MEANING OF A CONTRACT 64
1.1.5 (I) THE VOID CONTRACT 66
1.1.5 (II) RESTITUTION AND *A CONTRACT 68
1.1.6 POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE 5(1) RATIONE MATERIAEBY
ARTICLE 5(1) OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION AND THE HAGUE DRAFT
WORLDWIDE JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 70
1.2 THE OBLIGATION IN QUESTION 70
1.2.1 INDEPENDENT OR DEPENDENTV ACCESSORY OBLIGATIONS, AND THE
CONSEQUENCES OF EACH 77
1.2.1 (I) THE FRENCH DECISIONS ON THE OBLIGATION IN QUESTION 81
1.2.2 ASCERTAINING THE PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION 86
1.2.2 (I) ENGLISH CASES ON THE PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION 87
1.2.2 (II) FRENCH CASES ON THE PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION 93
1.2.2 (III) OTHER CONTRACTING STATES AND THE PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION 95
1.2.3 THE COURT S LEVEL OF CONTROL OVER A PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT S CLAIM 96
1.2.4 WHETHER ASCERTAINING THE PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION IS POSSIBLE, AND
OBLIGATORY; AND IF SO, IS SHENAVAI V KREISCHER IMPERATIVE IN ITS
APPLICATION? 99
1.2.5 MORE THAN ONE PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION, OR NO PRINCIPAL OBLIGATION
DISCERNIBLE LEATHERTEX DIVISIONE SINTETICI SPA V BODETEX BVBA 101
CONTENTS IX
1.2.6 A (TACIT) REQUIREMENT THAT THE ARTICLE 5(1) OBLIGATION, IN
ADDITION, BE CONTRACTUAL? 106
1.2.6 (I) THE ENGLISH CASES 107
1.2.6 (II) THE GERMAN CASES 112
1.2.7 THE REFORM OF ARTICLE 5( L) S OBLIGATION IN QUESTION AND ITS
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE *ARTICLE 5(1) OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION
AND ARTICLE 6 OF THE HAGUE DRAFT WORLDWIDE JUDGMENTS
CONVENTION 116
1.3 THE PLACE OF PERFORMANCE 119
1.3.1 HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS FOR THE PLACE OF PERFORMANCE UNDER
ARTICLE 5( 1)*THE CIVIL CODES OF EUROPE 124
1.3.2 THE BREAKDOWN, AND EROSION OF THE PROTECTIONIST RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN THE CIVIL CODES AND CODES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 131
1.3.3 THE APPLICATION OF TESSILI AND CUSTOM MADE COMMERCIAL IN
GERMAN CASES 134
1.3.4 THE APPLICATION OF TESSILI AND CUSTOM MADE COMMERCIAL IN
ENGLISH CASES 135
1.3.5 THE APPLICATION OF TESSILI AND CUSTOM MADE COMMERCIAL IN SWISS
AND AUSTRIAN CASES 139
1.3.6 THE APPLICATION OF TESSILI AND CUSTOM MADE COMMERCIAL IN
FRENCH CASES 142
1.3.7 CUSTOM MADE COMMERCIAL ITSELF, AND THE TRIUMPH OF A
CONVENTION AIM PREDICTABILITY 147
1.3.8 THE ATTEMPTED, BUT FAILED, REBELLION OF THE FRENCH COUR DE
CASSATION AGAINST TESSILI/CUSTOM MADE COMMERCIAL 150
1.3.9 THE REBELLION BY THE ADVOCATES GENERAL ON THE SAME DAY 153
1.3.9 (I) AG RUIZ-JARABO COLOMER S OPINION IN GIE GROUPE
CONCORDE E.A.OTHERS V THE MASTER OF THE VESSEL
SUHADIWARNO PANJAN 153
1.3.9 (II) AG LEGER S OPINION IN LEATHERTEX DIVISIONE SINTETICI SPA V
BODETEXBVBA 155
1.3.10 THE REBELLION IS CRUSHED ECJ DECISIONS IN GIE GROUPE
CONCORDE AND LEATHERTEX DIVISION 158
1.4 CONCLUSION AND THE REFORMS TO ARTICLE 5(1 ) S PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
BRUSSELS I REGULATION AND THE HAGUE WORLDWIDE JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 159
X CONTENTS
2 ARTICLE 17
INTRODUCTION 163
2.1 INTER NATIONALITY 172
2.1.1 CATEGORY A: BOTH PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT ARE DOMICILED IN
CONTRACTING STATE X, AND THE COURTS OF CONTRACTING STATE X
ARE CHOSEN 177
2.1.2 CATEGORY B: BOTH PARTIES TO THE CONTRACT ARE DOMICILED IN
CONTRACTING STATE X, YET THE COURTS OF CONTRACTING STATE Y
ARE CHOSEN 179
2.1.3 CATEGORY C: ONE CONTRACTING PARTY IS DOMICILED IN CONTRACTING
STATE X, THE OTHER IN CONTRACTING STATE Y, AND THE COURTS OF EITHER
CONTRACTING STATE X, Y OR Z ARE CHOSEN 182
2.1.4 CATEGORY D: A NON- CONTRACTING STATE COURT IS CHOSEN AND EITHER
(I) BOTH PARTIES ARE DOMICILED IN CONTRACTING STATE X; OR (II) ONE
PARTY IS DOMICILED IN CONTRACTING STATE X, THE OTHER IN CONTRACTING
STATE Y; OR (III) ONE PARTY IS DOMICILED IN CONTRACTING STATE X, THE
OTHER IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 184
2.1.4 (II) CATEGORY D: (II)*TWO CONTRACTING STATE PARTIES 185
(A) PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT DOMICILED IN ANOTHER CONTRACTING STATE 185
(B) PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT DOMICILED IN ENGLAND AND WALES 187
2.1.4 (III) CATEGORY D(III)*ONE PARTY DOMICILED IN A CONTRACTING
STATE, THE OTHER NOT 189
(A) PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT DOMICILED IN A NON-CONTRACTING STATE 189
2.1.5 CATEGORY E: A PARTY DOMICILED IN CONTRACTING STATE X AGREES
WITH A NON-CONTRACTING STATE PARTY EITHER (I) FOR THE COURTS OF
CONTRACTING STATE X, OR (II) FOR THE COURTS OF CONTRACTING STATE Y 191
2.1.5 (I) FRENCH COURT DECISIONS ON CATEGORY E(I) 197
2.1.5 (II) ENGLISH COURT DECISIONS ON CATEGORY E(I) 198
2.1.5 (III) GERMAN COURT DECISIONS ON CATEGORY E(I) 200
2.1.5 (IV) SWISS AND AUSTRIAN COURT DECISIONS ON CATEGORY E(I) 204
2.1.5 (V) A SOLUTION? THE WORDING OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION
AND THE DRAFT HAGUE WORLDWIDE JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 206
2.1.6 CATEGORY F: BOTH PARTIES ARE NON-CONTRACTING STATE DOMICILIARIES,
BUT THE COURTS OF CONTRACTING STATE X ARE CHOSEN 208
2.2 ARTICLE 17 AND BILLS OF LADING 209
2.2.1 TRACING THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE APPARENT ANTIPATHY
IN THE FRENCH CASES TO JURISDICTION CLAUSES IN BILLS OF LADING 215
2.2.2 THE COUR DE CASSATION AND BILLS OF LADING UNDER ARTICLE 17
THE POSITION TODAY 217
CONTENTS XI
2.3 THE TENSION BETWEEN ARTICLE 17 AND ARTICLE 21 225
2.3.1 ARTICLE 17 PREVAILING OVER ARTICLE 21 THE LEGITIMACY OF ANY REVIEW
BY THE COURT SECOND SEISED OF THE JURISDICTION TAKEN BY THE COURT
FIRST SEISED, WHEN DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT TO STAY ITS
PROCEEDINGS 228
2.3.1 (I) THE SECOND SEISED COURT BELIEVES IT HAS EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 16 230
2.3.1 (II) THE SECOND SEISED COURT BELIEVES IT HAS JURISDICTION UNDER
SECTION 3 OR 4 230
2.3.1 (III) THE SECOND SEISED COURT BELIEVES IT HAS EXCLUSIVE
JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 17 232
2.3.1 (IV) PROPOSALS FOR REFORM OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION 235
2.3.2 THE ENGLISH COURTS SECOND SEISED IN ORDER TO CONSIDER
DECLARATIONS THAT AN ARTICLE 17 (ENGLISH) JURISDICTION CLAUSE
IS VALID AND SUBSISTING, AND ACTIONS IN BREACH OF ARTICLE 17
INITIATED FIRST IN OTHER CONTRACTING STATES 236
2.3.2 (I) THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION ENQUIRY IN THE TWO SETS OF
PROCEEDINGS 236
(A) THE MEANING OF THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION
1
236
(B) THE SAME CAUSE OF ACTION AND THE INJUNCTION UNDER
ARTICLE 17 238
2.3.2 (II) PREPARING THE GROUND FOR A DEFENCE TO RECOGNITION AND
ENFORCEMENT OF THE ROGUE (CONTRACTING) STATE) JUDGMENT
UNDER ARTICLES 27(1), 27(3)*THE PRE-EMPTIVE GRANT OF AN
ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION FOR BREACH OF AN (ARTICLE 17) EXCLUSIVE
ENGLISH JURISDICTION CLAUSE 242
(A) CONTINENTAL BANK N.A. VAEAKOS COMPAGNIA NAVIERA S.A.
AND ITS PROGENY 244
(B) THE GRANT OF AN ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION IN CONTINENTAL BANK
N.A. V AEAKOS, IN BRUSSELS CONVENTION CASES, AND THE
ATTEMPT TO DISTINGUISH IT IN OT AFRICA LINE LTD V HIJAZY
AND OTHERS (THE KRIBI ) COUNTERVAILING FACTORS AND A
POSSIBLY NEW APPROACH 245
2.4 THE NEW VERSION OF ARTICLE 17(C) AN AGREEMENT.. .IN INTERNATIONAL
TRADE OR COMMERCE, IN A FORM WHICH ACCORDS WITH A USAGE OF WHICH THE
PARTIES ARE, OR OUGHT TO HAVE BEEN AWARE... 248
2.4.1 THE ARTICLE 17(1) AGREEMENT AND THE NEW ARTICLE 17(C) 250
2.4.1 (I) AGREEMENT *ITS MEANING, AND ASSIMILATION OF THE
MEANING OF A CONTRACT 250
2.4.1 (II) AGREEMENT AND THE PRESUMPTION OF AGREEMENT IN
ARTICLE 17(C), MAINSCHIFFAHRTS AND HUGO FRUMPY 253
2.4.1 (III) THE AGREEMENT AND ITS INDEPENDENCE FROM THE CONTRACT S
FORMATION/LEX CAUSAE*FRANCESCO BENINCASA V DENTALKIT SRI 254
XII CONTENTS
2.4.2 IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE OR COMMERCE 258
2.4.2 (I) FRENCH CASES ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE OR COMMERCE 260
2.4.3 IN A FORM WHICH ACCORDS WITH 261
2.4.4 PRACTICES/A USAGE 263
2.4.4 (I) PRACTICE/USAGE IN GERMAN CASE LAW 266
2.4.4 (II) PRACTICE/USAGE IN FRENCH CASE LAW 269
2.4.5 AWARENESS OF THE PRACTICE/USAGE 272
2.5 AMENDMENTS, IF ANY, BY THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION AND THE PRELIMINARY
DRAFT HAGUE WORLDWIDE JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 275
2.6 CONCLUSION 277
3 ARTICLE 24
INTRODUCTION 281
PART I 283
3.1 JURISDICTION OF THE REQUESTED COURT UNDER ARTICLE 24 BRUSSELS/LUGANO
CONVENTIONS 283
3.1.1 PREFACE TO THE HISTORICAL SECTION PROPOSITIONS FROM THE RECENT
CASE OF VAN UDEN MARITIME 283
PROPOSITION A 283
PROPOSITION B 284
PROPOSITION C 284
3.1.2 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW THE VIEWS AND CASELAW PREVAILING BEFORE
VAN UDEN MARITIME AND HANS HERMAN MIETZ 285
3.1.2 (I) JURISDICTION IN GERMANY 289
3.1.2 (II) JURISDICTION IN FRANCE 294
3.1.2 (III) JURISDICTION IN THE UK 302
3.2 VAN UDEN MARITIME AND HANS HERMAN MIETZ CLARIFICATION OF
JURISDICTION TO ORDER PROVISIONAL, INCLUDING PROTECTIVE MEASURES UNDER
ARTICLE 24 OF THE BRUSSELS AND LUGANO CONVENTIONS 308
3.2.1 JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLES 2, 5*18 ON THE MERITS TO ORDER
INTERIM RELIEF 309
3.2.2 JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 24 AND NATIONAL LAW TO ORDER
PROVISIONAL, INCLUDING PROTECTIVE MEASURES 310
3.2.3 QUESTIONS LEFT UNANSWERED BY VAN UDEN MARITIME 311
3.2.4 HANS HERMAN MIETZ THE EXPORTABILITY ISSUE *THE ENFORCEMENT OF
ARTICLE 24 ORDERS, AND VAN UDEN MARITIME ACROSS BORDERS? 312
3.2.5 THE LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY VAN UDEN MARITIME ARE COMPLIED
WITH 315
CONTENTS XIII
3.2.6 THE LIMITATIONS IMPOSED BY VAN UDEN MARITIME ARE NOT
COMPLIED WITH, OR ARE OVERSTEPPED 315
3.2.7 WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE GUARANTEE TO BE GIVEN (BY A GUARANTOR)
ON BEHALF OF THE CLAIMANT/APPLICANT 317
3.3 HOW, IF AT ALL, MAY VAN UDEN MARITIME AND HANS HERMAN MIETZ
AFFECT ENGLISH PRACTICE, S.25 CJJA 1982 AND THE GRANT OF MAREVA/FREEZING
INJUNCTIONS? 318
3.3.1 JURISDICTION UNDER TITLE II 318
3.3.2 JURISDICTION UNDER ARTICLE 24 319
3.3.3 SECTION 25 CJJA 1982 JURISDICTION, THE SISKINA, AND VAN UDEN
MARITIME 322
3.3.3 (I) WHERE THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT WAS TEMPORARILY PRESENT, OR
A CORPORATE ENTITY (OVERSEA COMPANY) WITH ITS SEAT IN ANOTHER
CONTRACTING STATE PLACE OF BUSINESS , DOING BUSINESS ,
SS 725,695, 694A COMPANIES ACT 1985 AND/OR CPR
6.2(2), 6.5(2) 323
3.3.3 (II) WHERE SERVICE OF THE RESPONDENT EX JURIS IS POSSIBLE UNDER A
COMBINATION, NOW, OF CPR 6.20(4) AND S.25 CJJA, WITH
PERMISSION 327
3.3.4 THE MEANING AND EXTENT OF S.25(2) CJJA 1982 INEXPEDIENT (IN
THE LIGHT OF VAN UDEN MARITIME) AND THE GRANT OF (WORLDWIDE)
MAREVO/FREEZING INJUNCTIONS 328
3.3.5 THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES OF VAN UDEN MARITIME ON THE US
PENDENS PROVISIONS IN ARTICLES 21/22 333
3.4 HOW, IF AT ALL, MAY VAN UDEN MARITIME AND HANS HERMAN MIETZ AFFECT
GERMAN PRACTICE OF GRANTING INTERIM RELIEF? 336
3.4.1 §919 ZPO JURISDICTION AND THE AVAILABILITY OF, INTER ALIA, §23 ZPO
336
3.4.2 §937 ZPO JURISDICTION AND THE AVAILABILITY OF, INTER ALIA, §23 ZPO
337
3.5 HOW, IF AT ALL, MAY VAN UDEN MARITIME AND HANS HERMAN MIETZ
AFFECT THE FRENCH PRACTICE OF GRANTING INTERIM RELIEF? 338
PART II
3.6 PROVISIONAL, INCLUDING PROTECTIVE MEASURES THEMSELVES, AND THE
FRENCH R#ERE-PROVISION IN ARTICLE 809(2) NCPC 338
3.6.1 A DEFINITION OF ARTICLE 24 S PROVISIONAL, INCLUDING PROTECTIVE
RELIEF? 341
3.6.2 THE NECESSITY OF A COMMUNITY DEFINITION OF PROVISIONAL,
INCLUDING PROTECTIVE MEASURES 343
3.6.2 (I) HISTORICAL PRECEDENTS 343
3.6.2 (II) THE CURRENT POSITION TODAY 345
XIV CONTENTS
3.6.3 INTERIM RELIEF/PAYMENTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES AND S.25 CJJA
1982, POST VAN UDEN MARITIME 352
3.6.3 (I) CPR PART 25 INTERIM REMEDIES 352
3.6.4 THE LIKELY REACTION, POST VAN UDEN MARITIME AND HANS HERMAN
MIETZ, OF OTHER CONTRACTING STATE COURTS TO AN APPLICATION UNDER
TITLE HI OF THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION, FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF A
WORLDWIDE MAREVAL FREEZING INJUNCTION ISSUED BY THE ENGLISH
COURTS UNDER ARTICLE 24/S.25 CJJA 1982 354
3.7 THE RETIRE-PROVISION ITSELF 356
3.7.1 THE RIFERE-PROVISION PREJUDGING, AND PRE-EMPTING THE COURT ON
THE MERITS 359
3.7.2 FULL RECOVERY OF THE CLAIM 360
3.7.3 DISPENSING WITH THE NEED FOR A FULL TRIAL 361
3.7.4 A REVERSAL OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE LITIGATION 361
3.7.5 THE RISK OF THE APPLICANT S ENSUING INSOLVENCY 362
3.7.6 A DETOURNEMENT OF THE CONVENTION AND THE ISSUE OF EXPORTABILITY
362
3.7.7 THE DISCUSSION IN THE CASES, AND A COMPARISON WITH THE REFERE
GRANTED IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 363
3.8 THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION AND THE HAGUE CONFERENCE DRAFT WORLDWIDE
JUDGMENTS CONVENTION 366
3.9 CONCLUSION 371
4 ARTICLE 27(1), PUBLIC POLICY
INTRODUCTION 373
4.1 MATERIAL AND PROCEDURAL PUBLIC POLICY 376
4.2 PRE- BRUSSELS AND LUGANO CONVENTION DEFINITIONS IN THE
CONTRACTING STATES 378
4.2.1 THE PUBLIC POLICY DEFENCE UNDER GERMAN AUTONOMOUS LAW 379
4.2.2 THE PUBLIC POLICY DEFENCE IN ENGLAND AND WALES AT COMMON
LAW 383
4.2.3 THE PUBLIC POLICY DEFENCE UNDER FRENCH AUTONOMOUS LAW 385
4.2.4 THE PUBLIC POLICY DEFENCE UNDER SWISS AUTONOMOUS LAW 387
4.2.5 THE PUBLIC POLICY DEFENCE UNDER BELGIAN, ITALIAN, AUSTRIAN AND
SPANISH AUTONOMOUS LAW 392
4.3 THE COMMUNITY DIMENSION TO PUBLIC POLICY AND THE EUROPEAN
COURT OF JUSTICE 393
4.3.1 THE AG SAGGIO S OPINION IN DIETER KROMBACH V ANDRE BAMBERSKI 395
4.3.2 THE ECJ S DECISION IN DIETER KROMBACH V ANDRE BAMBERSKI 398
CONTENTS XV
4.3.3 THE ECJ S DECISION AND AG ALBER S OPINION IN SA REGIE NATIONALE
DES USINES RENAULT V SPA MAXICAR AND ORAZIO FORMENTO 402
4.3.4 ARTICLE 27(1) AND THE RESTRICTIONS UNDER ARTICLES 28 AND 29/
ARTICLE 34 II, III 403
4.4 EXAMPLES OF CONTRACTING STATE CASE LAW APPLYING ARTICLE 27( 1)
BRUSSELS CONVENTION 406
4.4.1 FRENCH CASE LAW UNDER ARTICLE 27(1) AND THE RECEPTION OF FRAUD 406
4.4.2 BELGIAN CASE LAW UNDER ARTICLE 27( 1) 412
4.4.3 UK CASE LAW UNDER ARTICLE 27( 1) AND THE RECEPTION OF FRAUD 413
4.4.4 GERMAN CASE LAW UNDER ARTICLE 27(1), THE RECEPTION OF FRAUD
AND THE PROCEDURAL/MATERIAL PUBLIC POLICY ISSUE 421
4.4.4 (I) PROCEDURAL PUBLIC POLICY 421
4.4.4 (II) MATERIAL PUBLIC POLICY 430
4.5 THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION AND THE DRAFT HAGUE WORLDWIDE JUDGMENTS
CONVENTION 432
4.6 CONCLUSION 435
5 ARTICLE 27(2)
5.1 INTRODUCTION 437
5.1.1 ARTICLE 27(2) S HISTORICAL ORIGINS 439
5.1.2 THE MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY OF ARTICLE 27(2) AND ARTICLE 27( 1) 443
5.1.3 RAISING THE DEFENCE OF ARTICLE 27(2) BY THE COURT OF ITS OWN
MOTION 446
5.1.4 THE EQUIPOISE BETWEEN A JUDGMENT CREDITOR S AND DEBTOR S
INTERESTS, AND THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING 450
5.1.5 THE NECESSITY OF APPEALING AGAINST THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN THE
STATE OF ORIGIN UNDER ARTICLE 27(2)? 452
5.2 IN DEFAULT OF APPEARANCE 455
5.2.1 APPEARANCE AFTER JUDGMENT IN DEFAULT HAS BEEN GIVEN? 456
5.2.1 (I) APPEARANCE TO HAVE THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT SET ASIDE IN
ENGLAND UNDER UNDER CPR RULE 13 458
5.2.1 (II) LEGISLATIVE CLARIFICATION OF APPEALING AGAINST A DEFAULT
JUDGMENT THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION AND CHALLENGING THE
JUDGMENT 461
5.2.2 APPEARANCE BEFORE JUDGMENT 466
5.2.2 (I) ARTICLE 27(2) APPEARANCE (BEFORE JUDGMENT) AND
COMMUNICATING WITH THE RENDERING COURT 467
5.2.2 (II) APPEARANCE BEFORE JUDGMENT IN RELATED/PARTIE CIVILE
PROCEEDINGS 469
XVI CONTENTS
5.2.2 (III) APPEARANCE CONSIDERED AS FULFILLED UNDER THE PROCEDURAL
LAW OF THE RENDERING COURT 470
5.2.3 APPEARANCE IN CASES OUTSIDE GERMANY 472
5.2.4 APPEARANCE BEFORE JUDGMENT IN ENGLAND AND WALES WHEN
MAY ANOTHER CONTRACTING STATE COURT CONSIDER A DEFENDANT TO
HAVE APPEARED 473
5.3 THE DOCUMENT WHICH INSTITUTED THE PROCEEDINGS 474
5.3.1 THE DOCUMENT WHICH INSTITUTED THE PROCEEDINGS AND
UNCONTRADICTED SUMMARY (DEBT COLLECTION) ACTIONS 475
5.3.1 (I) THE MAHNVERFAHREN PROCEDURE AND PETER KLOMPS V
KARL MICHEL 475
5.3.1 (II) THE DECRETO INGIUNCTIVO AND HENGST IMPORT BV V ANNA
MARIA CAMPESE 476
5.3.2 THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF HENGST V CAMPESE ALL
5.3.2 (I) THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF HENGST ON ENGLISH PROCEEDINGS
WHICH WERE INSTITUTED BY A DOCUMENT BEFORE 26 APRIL 1999 478
5.3.2 (II) THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF HENGST ON ENGLISH PROCEEDINGS
WHICH WERE INSTITUTED BY A DOCUMENT ON OR AFTER 26 APRIL 1999 480
5.3.3 THE PRECISE AND/OR SUFFICIENT CONTENTS OF THE DOCUMENT WHICH
INSTITUTED THE PROCEEDINGS 483
5.3.4 PARTIE CIVILE ACTIONS THEMSELVES AND THE DOCUMENT INSTITUTING THE
PROCEEDINGS 486
5.3.5 THE SUBSEQUENT SERVICE OF OTHER, ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS IN THE
PROCEEDINGS AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 27(2) 487
5.3.6 CONTESTED SUMMARY (DEBT COLLECTION) ACTIONS THE MAHNVERFAHREN
AND THE LODGING OF AN OBJECTION*THE EFFECT ON THE DOCUMENT
WHICH INSTITUTED THE PROCEEDINGS 489
5.4 DUE SERVICE UNDER ARTICLE 27(2) 492
5.4.1 THE GERMAN POSITION WITH REGARD TO DUE SERVICE 494
5.4.2 OTHER CONTRACTING STATES POSITIONS WITH REGARD TO DUE SERVICE
500
5.4.3 DUE SERVICE BY THE REMISE AU PARQUET, AND ARTICLE 27(2) 500
5.4.3 (I) GERMAN CASE LAW ON THE REMISE AU PARQUET 503
5.4.4 THE LIMITED FUTURE OF DUE SERVICE UNDER THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION
(AND COUNCIL SERVICE REGULATION 1348/2000 OF 29 MAY 2000 ON
SERVICE IN THE MEMBER STATES OF JUDICIAL AND EXTRAJUDICIAL
DOCUMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS) 506
5.4.4 (I) COUNCIL SERVICE REGULATION 1348/2000 AND THE LIMITED
FUTURE OF DUE SERVICE FROM 31 MAY 2001 UNTIL 2 MARCH 2002 507
CONTENTS XVII
5.5 IN SUFFICIENT TIME 510
5.5.1 INSUFFICIENT TIME DESPITE DUE SERVICE 511
5.5.2 EXAMPLES OF SUFFICIENCY 513
5.5.3 GERMAN CASE LAW AND SUFFICIENCY OF TIME 514
5.5.4 ITALIAN CASE LAW AND THE SUFFICIENCY OF TIME 516
5.5.5 FRENCH CASE LAW AND SUFFICIENCY OF TIME 516
5.5.6 A PROTECTIONIST VEIN IN ARTICLE 27(2)? 516
5.6 CONCLUSION: ARTICLE 27(2) 517
CONCLUSION 519
BIBLIOGRAPHY*BOOKS 523
BIBLIOGRAPHY LIST OF ARTICLES 543
INDEX 585
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Newton, Justin |
| author_facet | Newton, Justin |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Newton, Justin |
| author_variant | j n jn |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV016504906 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJC3795 |
| callnumber-raw | KJC3795 |
| callnumber-search | KJC3795 |
| callnumber-sort | KJC 43795 |
| classification_rvk | PT 340 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)248639322 (DE-599)BVBBV016504906 |
| dewey-full | 341.4 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.4 |
| dewey-search | 341.4 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.4 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02335nam a2200565 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV016504906</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20061218 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">030207s2002 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">184113323X</subfield><subfield code="9">1-84113-323-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)248639322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV016504906</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="h">fre</subfield><subfield code="h">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC3795</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 340</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139872:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Newton, Justin</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions</subfield><subfield code="c">Justin Newton</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart</subfield><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CXXX, 595 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of judicial decisions - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court of Justice of the European Communities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen - Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="2">idszbz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsentscheidung</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisdiction - Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Konflikt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lugano-Übereinkommen - Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="2">idszbz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Lugano-Übereinkommen</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsentscheidung</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationaler Zivilprozess - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa</subfield><subfield code="2">idsbb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Privatrecht - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa</subfield><subfield code="2">idsbb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Privatrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010200008&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010200008</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europa swd Europäische Union swd |
| geographic_facet | Europa Europäische Union |
| id | DE-604.BV016504906 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T19:11:16Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 184113323X |
| language | English French German |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-010200008 |
| oclc_num | 248639322 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-703 |
| physical | CXXX, 595 S. |
| publishDate | 2002 |
| publishDateSearch | 2002 |
| publishDateSort | 2002 |
| publisher | Hart |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Newton, Justin Verfasser aut The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions Justin Newton Oxford [u.a.] Hart 2002 CXXX, 595 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Conflict of judicial decisions - Europe Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Europe Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Court of Justice of the European Communities EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Europa Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen - Auslegung idszbz Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen swd Gerichtsentscheidung Jurisdiction - Europe Konflikt Lugano-Übereinkommen - Auslegung idszbz Lugano-Übereinkommen swd Auslegung swd Gerichtsentscheidung swd Internationaler Zivilprozess - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa idsbb Internationales Privatrecht - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa idsbb Internationales Privatrecht swd Internationales Zivilprozessrecht swd Rechtsvergleich swd Europa swd Europäische Union swd SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010200008&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Newton, Justin The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions Conflict of judicial decisions - Europe Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Europe Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Court of Justice of the European Communities EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Europa Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen - Auslegung idszbz Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen swd Gerichtsentscheidung Jurisdiction - Europe Konflikt Lugano-Übereinkommen - Auslegung idszbz Lugano-Übereinkommen swd Auslegung swd Gerichtsentscheidung swd Internationaler Zivilprozess - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa idsbb Internationales Privatrecht - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa idsbb Internationales Privatrecht swd Internationales Zivilprozessrecht swd Rechtsvergleich swd |
| title | The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions |
| title_auth | The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions |
| title_exact_search | The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions |
| title_full | The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions Justin Newton |
| title_fullStr | The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions Justin Newton |
| title_full_unstemmed | The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions Justin Newton |
| title_short | The uniform interpretation of the Brussels and Lugano conventions |
| title_sort | the uniform interpretation of the brussels and lugano conventions |
| topic | Conflict of judicial decisions - Europe Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Europe Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Court of Justice of the European Communities EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Europa Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen - Auslegung idszbz Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen swd Gerichtsentscheidung Jurisdiction - Europe Konflikt Lugano-Übereinkommen - Auslegung idszbz Lugano-Übereinkommen swd Auslegung swd Gerichtsentscheidung swd Internationaler Zivilprozess - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa idsbb Internationales Privatrecht - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa idsbb Internationales Privatrecht swd Internationales Zivilprozessrecht swd Rechtsvergleich swd |
| topic_facet | Conflict of judicial decisions - Europe Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Europe Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Court of Justice of the European Communities EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Europa Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen - Auslegung Europäisches Gerichtsstands- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen Gerichtsentscheidung Jurisdiction - Europe Konflikt Lugano-Übereinkommen - Auslegung Lugano-Übereinkommen Auslegung Internationaler Zivilprozess - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa Internationales Privatrecht - Rechtsvergleichung - Europa Internationales Privatrecht Internationales Zivilprozessrecht Rechtsvergleich Europäische Union |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=010200008&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT newtonjustin theuniforminterpretationofthebrusselsandluganoconventions |