Original sin: Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives
Publisher's description: Originalism is the practice of reviewing constitutional cases by seeking to discern the framers' and ratifiers' intent. Original sin argues that the "jurisprudence of original intent," represented on the current Supreme Court by Justices Antonin Scal...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York [u.a.]
New York Univ. Press
2002
|
Schriftenreihe: | Critical America
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | Publisher's description: Originalism is the practice of reviewing constitutional cases by seeking to discern the framers' and ratifiers' intent. Original sin argues that the "jurisprudence of original intent," represented on the current Supreme Court by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, has failed on its own terms. Attempts to determine the framers' intent have not brought greater determinacy and legitimacy to the process of constitutional interpretation. Instead, the method has been marked by the very flaws--including self-interested reasoning and the manipulation of doctrine--that originalists argue marred the jurisprudence of the judicial "activists" of the Warren Court. Original sin brings a rigorous review of the performance of the "new originalists" to the debate, applying their methodology to real cases. Marcosson focuses on the judicial decisions of Clarence Thomas, an avowed originalist who nevertheless advocates "color blind" readings of the Constitution which are at odds with the framers' ideas concerning anti-miscegenation and other laws. After critiquing what he sees as a troubling use of originalism and explaining why it has failed to provide a consistent basis for constitutional decision-making, the author goes on to offer an alternative approach: one that lends greater legitimacy to the Court's interpretations of the Constitution. |
Beschreibung: | XIII, 218 S. |
ISBN: | 0814756409 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV014546098 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20021104 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 020703s2002 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 2001008462 | ||
020 | |a 0814756409 |9 0-8147-5640-9 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)48662351 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV014546098 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF8742 | |
082 | 0 | |a 347.73/26 |2 21 | |
084 | |a PL 734 |0 (DE-625)137270: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Marcosson, Samuel A. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Original sin |b Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives |c Samuel A. Marcosson |
264 | 1 | |a New York [u.a.] |b New York Univ. Press |c 2002 | |
300 | |a XIII, 218 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Critical America | |
520 | 3 | |a Publisher's description: Originalism is the practice of reviewing constitutional cases by seeking to discern the framers' and ratifiers' intent. Original sin argues that the "jurisprudence of original intent," represented on the current Supreme Court by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, has failed on its own terms. Attempts to determine the framers' intent have not brought greater determinacy and legitimacy to the process of constitutional interpretation. Instead, the method has been marked by the very flaws--including self-interested reasoning and the manipulation of doctrine--that originalists argue marred the jurisprudence of the judicial "activists" of the Warren Court. Original sin brings a rigorous review of the performance of the "new originalists" to the debate, applying their methodology to real cases. Marcosson focuses on the judicial decisions of Clarence Thomas, an avowed originalist who nevertheless advocates "color blind" readings of the Constitution which are at odds with the framers' ideas concerning anti-miscegenation and other laws. After critiquing what he sees as a troubling use of originalism and explaining why it has failed to provide a consistent basis for constitutional decision-making, the author goes on to offer an alternative approach: one that lends greater legitimacy to the Court's interpretations of the Constitution. | |
600 | 1 | 7 | |a Thomas, Clarence |d 1948- |0 (DE-588)11906863X |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |x History |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
650 | 4 | |a Constitutional history |z United States | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Richterwahl |0 (DE-588)4131222-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Geschichte |0 (DE-588)4020517-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Thomas, Clarence |d 1948- |0 (DE-588)11906863X |D p |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte |0 (DE-588)4020517-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Thomas, Clarence |d 1948- |0 (DE-588)11906863X |D p |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
689 | 1 | 2 | |a Richterwahl |0 (DE-588)4131222-3 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009891656&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-009891656 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804129326095925248 |
---|---|
adam_text | ORIGINAL SIN / MARCOSSON, SAMUEL A. : C2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
I NEVER LIE
MULTITUDES IN ME
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
STATES OF GRACE?
THE SMOKING GUN
A BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS?
ANY MORE SUCH VICTORIES
LEGITIMATION.
DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT.
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Marcosson, Samuel A. |
author_facet | Marcosson, Samuel A. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Marcosson, Samuel A. |
author_variant | s a m sa sam |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV014546098 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF8742 |
callnumber-raw | KF8742 |
callnumber-search | KF8742 |
callnumber-sort | KF 48742 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
classification_rvk | PL 734 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)48662351 (DE-599)BVBBV014546098 |
dewey-full | 347.73/26 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
dewey-raw | 347.73/26 |
dewey-search | 347.73/26 |
dewey-sort | 3347.73 226 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03395nam a2200541zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV014546098</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20021104 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">020703s2002 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2001008462</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0814756409</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8147-5640-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)48662351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV014546098</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8742</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/26</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 734</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137270:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcosson, Samuel A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Original sin</subfield><subfield code="b">Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives</subfield><subfield code="c">Samuel A. Marcosson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">New York Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIII, 218 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Critical America</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Publisher's description: Originalism is the practice of reviewing constitutional cases by seeking to discern the framers' and ratifiers' intent. Original sin argues that the "jurisprudence of original intent," represented on the current Supreme Court by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, has failed on its own terms. Attempts to determine the framers' intent have not brought greater determinacy and legitimacy to the process of constitutional interpretation. Instead, the method has been marked by the very flaws--including self-interested reasoning and the manipulation of doctrine--that originalists argue marred the jurisprudence of the judicial "activists" of the Warren Court. Original sin brings a rigorous review of the performance of the "new originalists" to the debate, applying their methodology to real cases. Marcosson focuses on the judicial decisions of Clarence Thomas, an avowed originalist who nevertheless advocates "color blind" readings of the Constitution which are at odds with the framers' ideas concerning anti-miscegenation and other laws. After critiquing what he sees as a troubling use of originalism and explaining why it has failed to provide a consistent basis for constitutional decision-making, the author goes on to offer an alternative approach: one that lends greater legitimacy to the Court's interpretations of the Constitution.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Thomas, Clarence</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)11906863X</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional history</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Richterwahl</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131222-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020517-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Thomas, Clarence</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)11906863X</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020517-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Thomas, Clarence</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)11906863X</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Richterwahl</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4131222-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009891656&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-009891656</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV014546098 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T19:03:21Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0814756409 |
language | English |
lccn | 2001008462 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-009891656 |
oclc_num | 48662351 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-739 DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-739 DE-12 |
physical | XIII, 218 S. |
publishDate | 2002 |
publishDateSearch | 2002 |
publishDateSort | 2002 |
publisher | New York Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Critical America |
spelling | Marcosson, Samuel A. Verfasser aut Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives Samuel A. Marcosson New York [u.a.] New York Univ. Press 2002 XIII, 218 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Critical America Publisher's description: Originalism is the practice of reviewing constitutional cases by seeking to discern the framers' and ratifiers' intent. Original sin argues that the "jurisprudence of original intent," represented on the current Supreme Court by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, has failed on its own terms. Attempts to determine the framers' intent have not brought greater determinacy and legitimacy to the process of constitutional interpretation. Instead, the method has been marked by the very flaws--including self-interested reasoning and the manipulation of doctrine--that originalists argue marred the jurisprudence of the judicial "activists" of the Warren Court. Original sin brings a rigorous review of the performance of the "new originalists" to the debate, applying their methodology to real cases. Marcosson focuses on the judicial decisions of Clarence Thomas, an avowed originalist who nevertheless advocates "color blind" readings of the Constitution which are at odds with the framers' ideas concerning anti-miscegenation and other laws. After critiquing what he sees as a troubling use of originalism and explaining why it has failed to provide a consistent basis for constitutional decision-making, the author goes on to offer an alternative approach: one that lends greater legitimacy to the Court's interpretations of the Constitution. Thomas, Clarence 1948- (DE-588)11906863X gnd rswk-swf United States. Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte Constitutional history United States Richterwahl (DE-588)4131222-3 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 gnd rswk-swf USA Thomas, Clarence 1948- (DE-588)11906863X p USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 s DE-604 Richterwahl (DE-588)4131222-3 s LoC Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009891656&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Marcosson, Samuel A. Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives Thomas, Clarence 1948- (DE-588)11906863X gnd United States. Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Geschichte Constitutional history United States Richterwahl (DE-588)4131222-3 gnd Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)11906863X (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4131222-3 (DE-588)4020517-4 |
title | Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives |
title_auth | Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives |
title_exact_search | Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives |
title_full | Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives Samuel A. Marcosson |
title_fullStr | Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives Samuel A. Marcosson |
title_full_unstemmed | Original sin Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives Samuel A. Marcosson |
title_short | Original sin |
title_sort | original sin clarence thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives |
title_sub | Clarence Thomas and the failure of the constitutional conservatives |
topic | Thomas, Clarence 1948- (DE-588)11906863X gnd United States. Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Geschichte Constitutional history United States Richterwahl (DE-588)4131222-3 gnd Geschichte (DE-588)4020517-4 gnd |
topic_facet | Thomas, Clarence 1948- United States. Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court Geschichte Constitutional history United States Richterwahl USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009891656&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcossonsamuela originalsinclarencethomasandthefailureoftheconstitutionalconservatives |