Judicial decision making: is psychology relevant?
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York [u.a.]
Kluwer Acad., Plenum Publ.
1999
|
Schriftenreihe: | Perspectives in law and psychology
11 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XVII, 258 S. |
ISBN: | 0306461544 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV013135802 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20000511 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 000504s1999 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0306461544 |9 0-306-46154-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)41337999 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV013135802 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-739 |a DE-20 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF8775 | |
082 | 0 | |a 340/.19 |2 21 | |
084 | |a PI 3040 |0 (DE-625)136587: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wrightsman, Lawrence S. |d 1931- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)138421137 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicial decision making |b is psychology relevant? |c Lawrence S. Wrightman |
264 | 1 | |a New York [u.a.] |b Kluwer Acad., Plenum Publ. |c 1999 | |
300 | |a XVII, 258 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Perspectives in law and psychology |v 11 | |
650 | 2 | |a Decision Making | |
650 | 2 | |a Jurisprudence | |
650 | 2 | |a Psychology - legislation & jurisprudence | |
650 | 2 | |a United States | |
650 | 7 | |a Rechtspraak |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Rechtsvinding |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Psychologie | |
650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
650 | 4 | |a Decision Making |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Judges |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial process |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Jurisprudence |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Law |x Psychological aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Psychology |x legislation & jurisprudence |z United States | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtspsychologie |0 (DE-588)4177258-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rechtsprechung |0 (DE-588)4115710-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Rechtspsychologie |0 (DE-588)4177258-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
830 | 0 | |a Perspectives in law and psychology |v 11 |w (DE-604)BV000005831 |9 11 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008948102&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008948102 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804127833293848576 |
---|---|
adam_text | JUDIDAL DECISION MAKING IS PSYCHOLOGY RELEVANT? LAWRENCE S. WRIGHTSMAN
UNIVERSITY QFKANSAS LAWRENCE, KANSAS KLUWER ACADEMIC / PLENUM PUBLISHERS
NEW YORK, BOSTON, DORDRECHT, LONDON, MOSCOW CONTENTS CHARTER L:HOW DO
JUDGES DECIDE? 1 THE STATUS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES 3 RESPONSE OF THE
FEDERAI GOVERNMENT AND OF OTHER STATES 5 DETERMINING THE LEGALITY OF
SAME-SEX MARRIAGES 5 THE TULI FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE OF THE UNITED
STATES CONSTITUTION 6 PREDICTING THE REACTION OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
8 THE PURPOSES OF THIS BOOK 17 MODELSOF JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING 19 THE
ATTITUDINAL MODEL 20 THE COGNITIVE MODEL 22 OVERVIEW 23 CHAPTER2:
OPINION FORMATION AND EXPRESSION 27 THE SUPREME COURT S PROCEDURE 28
CASE SELECTION 28 AMICUS BRIEFS 31 ORAI ARGUMENTS 31 THE JUDICIAL
CONFERENCE 32 THE DRAFT OPINION 35 NEGOTIATIONS 35 THE MAJORITY OPINION
36 ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE DECISION 36 XIV CONTENTS OPINION FORMATION 37
PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES 37 CONSISTENCY OF VALUES 39 THE HOW OF
INITIAL DECISION MAKING 42 THE EXPERT-NOVICE DISTINCTION 42 SOCIAL
COGNITION 42 THE SALIENCE OF ATTITUDES 45 ATTITUDES AND JUDICIAL
DECISION MAKING 45 THE LEGAI MODEL VERSUS THE ATTITUDINAL MODEL 45 DO
JUDGES VALUES AND ATTITUDES COLOR THEIR OPINIONS? 49 JUDGES VALUES AND
THEIR PRONOUNCEMENTS 49 JUDGES VALUES AND PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENTS 50
JUDGES ATTITUDES AND PERCEPTION OF THE FACTS 52 INTEGRATING APPROACHES
TO OPINION FORMATION: MOTIVATED REASONING 55 CONCLUSIONS 56 CHARTER 3:
ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE JUDGES 57 PUBLIC OPINION 58 ELECTED VERSUS
APPOINTED JUDGES 59 INTEREST GROUPS 62 THE MEDIA AND LEGAI COLLEAGUES 65
CONGRESS 68 THE PRESIDENT 68 BRIEFS AND ORAI ARGUMENTS 71 THE JUDICIAL
CONFERENCE 74 POSTCONFERENCE INFLUENCE ATTEMPTS 75 PSYCHOLOGICAL
ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE PROCESS 75 COMPLIANCE-GAINING STRATEGIES 75
TYPES OF POWER AND INFLUENCE 76 NORMATIVE VERSUS INFORMATIONAL INFLUENCE
78 JUSTICES ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE OTHER JUSTICES 78 BARGAINING AND
NEGOTIATION 79 JUSTICE DOUGLAS AND ROE V. WADE 80 CONCLUSIONS 81 CHAPTER
4: THE ROLE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE 83 WHAT MAKES A GREAT CHIEF JUSTICE?
83 IDEAI QUALITIES 85 POWER TO PERSUADE 87 LEADERSHIP THEORIES 88
LEADERSHIP FUNCTIONS 89 CONTENTS XV APPLICATIONS TO THE CHIEF JUSTICE 92
FIEDLER SCONTINGENCYTHEORY 95 APPLICATIONS TO THE SUPREME COURT 100 TASK
ORIENTATION 101 RELATIONSHIP ORIENTATION 102 CONCLUSIONS 102 CHARTER 5:
RESPONSES TO INFLUENCE 105 WHAT HAPPENS PSYCHOLOGICALLY? 107 MOTIVATIONS
FOR ASSIGNING OPINIONS 108 INDIVIDUAI DIFFERENCES 109 COALITION
FORMATION 110 WRITING THE DRAFT OPINION ILI GOALS ILI PROCEDURES ILI
ANEXAMPLE ILI RECIPIENTS RESPONSES TO A DRAFT OPINION 114 INDIVIDUAI
GOALS 114 BARGAINING 115 CONFORMITY PRESSURE 116 STRATEGIE VERSUS
SINCERE VOTING 120 DECISION TO DISSENT 122 CONCLUSIONS 123 CHARTER 6:
HISTORY OF THE PSYCHOLOGY-LAW RELATIONSHIP 125 EARLY ASPECTS OF THE
RELATIONSHIP 126 THE ROLE OF HUGO MUNSTERBERG 129 MUNSTERBERG S GOALS
131 MUNSTERBERG S VALUES 131 MUNSTERBERG S ACTIVITIES 132 MUNSTERBERG S
IMPACT 134 THE 1970S: RENEWED INTEREST 135 THEPRESENT 136 PSYCHOLOGY S
ROLE IN BROWN V. BOARI OFEDUCATION 136 THE NAACP S RECRUITMENT OF SOCIAL
SCIENTISTS 136 THE CLARK AND CLARK DOLI STUDY 137 THE SOCIAL SCIENCE
STATEMENT 138 THE BROWN DECISION AND THE IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGY 139 LATER
INTERACTIONS WITH THE SUPREME COURT 140 BALIEW V. GEORGIA 1978 140
MCCLESKEY V. KEMP 1987 144 CONCLUSIONS 147 XVI CONTENTS CHAPTER 7: THE
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION S ORGANIZED AMICUS ACTIVITY 149
HISTORY AND FUNCTION OF AMICUS BRIEFS 149 USE OF AMICUS BRIEFS BY OTHER
ORGANIZATIONS 151 REGENTS OFTHE UNIVERSITY OFCALIFORNIA V. BAKKE 1978
152 WEBSTER V. REPRODUCTIVE SERVICES 1989 153 BOWENV. KENDRICKL988 153
PSYCHOLOGY S USE OF AMICUS BRIEFS 153 INVOLVEMENT BY PSYCHOLOGISTS AS
INDIVIDUAI 154 ORGANIZED PSYCHOLOGY S RELUCTANCE TO GET INVOLVED 154
FORMATION OF COLI AND THE OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL 154 CLASSIFYING ARA
BRIEFS 155 THE APA S GOALS FOR SCIENCE-TRANSLATION BRIEFS 157 AN APA
AMICUS BRIEF: PRICE WATERHOUSE V. HOPKINS 1989 159 THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
AMICUS BRIEFS , 165 MEASURING EFFECTIVENESS 165 GENERAL EFFECTIVENESS
166 THE APA S EFFECTIVENESS 166 SUMMARY 167 CHARTER 8: THE APA S AMICUS
ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE THE SUPREME COURT ... 169 HARRIS V. FORKLIFT
SYSTEMS, INC. 1993 169 THEFACTS 170 THE BRIEF 171 THE DECISION 172 THE
REASONABLE PERSON STANDARD 173 CRITICISMS OF THE COURT S OPINION 174
CONCLUSIONS 175 MARYLANDV. CRAIG 1990 175 AKE V. OKLAHOMA 1985 176
THEFACTS 177 THE BRIEF 177 THE DECISION 178 THEDISSENT 179 IMPACT OF THE
APA S AMICUS BRIEF 181 FORD V. WAINWRIGHT 1986 181 THEFACTS 181 THE
BRIEF 183 THE DECISION 184 THEDISSENT 185 WHATTO ARGUE: PENRYV. LYNAUGH
1989 186 THEFACTS 186 THE BRIEF 187 CONTENTS XVII THE DECISION 188 THE
MAJORITY OPINION AND THE APA S AMICUS BRIEF 190 CONCURRING AND
DISSENTING OPINIONS 190 CONCLUSIONS 191 CHARTER 9: UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS
TO INFLUENCE THE COURT 193 OVERVIEW 193 BOIVERS V. HARDWICK 1986 193
THEFACTS 193 THE BRIEF 194 THE DECISION 195 THEDISSENT 195 EVALUATION
196 ADOLESCENT ABORTION RIGHTS CASES 196 OHIO V. AKRON CENTERFOR
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ET AL. 1990 197 LOCKHART V. MCCREE 1986 201
EVALUATION 208 CONCLUSIONS 211 CHARTER 10: THE FUTURE OF THE
PSYCHOLOGY-LAW RELATIONSHIP 213 OVERVIEW 213 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
REVISITED 213 USES AND MISUSES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH FINDINGS 214
LEE V. WEISMAN 1992 215 PRIMARY VERSUS SECONDARY SOURCES 218 JUDICIAL
PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CITATION 219 INDIVIDUAI JUDGES
ATTITUDES TOWARD PSYCHOLOGY 220 OBSTACLES TO PSYCHOLOGY S INFLUENCE ON
THE LAW 221 JUDGES VALUES REVISITED 222 WHEN DO JUDGES CITE THE
RESEARCH?-A CYNICAL VIEW 222 CONCLUSIONS 224 REFERENCES 227 NAME INDEX
243 SUBJECT INDEX 247
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Wrightsman, Lawrence S. 1931- |
author_GND | (DE-588)138421137 |
author_facet | Wrightsman, Lawrence S. 1931- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Wrightsman, Lawrence S. 1931- |
author_variant | l s w ls lsw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV013135802 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF8775 |
callnumber-raw | KF8775 |
callnumber-search | KF8775 |
callnumber-sort | KF 48775 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
classification_rvk | PI 3040 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)41337999 (DE-599)BVBBV013135802 |
dewey-full | 340/.19 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
dewey-raw | 340/.19 |
dewey-search | 340/.19 |
dewey-sort | 3340 219 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02197nam a2200589 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV013135802</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20000511 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">000504s1999 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0306461544</subfield><subfield code="9">0-306-46154-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)41337999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV013135802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8775</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340/.19</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PI 3040</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136587:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wrightsman, Lawrence S.</subfield><subfield code="d">1931-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)138421137</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial decision making</subfield><subfield code="b">is psychology relevant?</subfield><subfield code="c">Lawrence S. Wrightman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Kluwer Acad., Plenum Publ.</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVII, 258 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perspectives in law and psychology</subfield><subfield code="v">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Decision Making</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Psychology - legislation & jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtspraak</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvinding</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychologie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Decision Making</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judges</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Jurisprudence</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Psychological aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield><subfield code="x">legislation & jurisprudence</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtspsychologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177258-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rechtsprechung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115710-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Rechtspsychologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177258-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Perspectives in law and psychology</subfield><subfield code="v">11</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV000005831</subfield><subfield code="9">11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008948102&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008948102</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV013135802 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:39:38Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0306461544 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008948102 |
oclc_num | 41337999 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-739 DE-20 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-739 DE-20 |
physical | XVII, 258 S. |
publishDate | 1999 |
publishDateSearch | 1999 |
publishDateSort | 1999 |
publisher | Kluwer Acad., Plenum Publ. |
record_format | marc |
series | Perspectives in law and psychology |
series2 | Perspectives in law and psychology |
spelling | Wrightsman, Lawrence S. 1931- Verfasser (DE-588)138421137 aut Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? Lawrence S. Wrightman New York [u.a.] Kluwer Acad., Plenum Publ. 1999 XVII, 258 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Perspectives in law and psychology 11 Decision Making Jurisprudence Psychology - legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspraak gtt Rechtsvinding gtt Psychologie Recht Decision Making United States Judges United States Judicial process United States Jurisprudence United States Law Psychological aspects Psychology legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspsychologie (DE-588)4177258-1 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 s Rechtspsychologie (DE-588)4177258-1 s DE-604 Perspectives in law and psychology 11 (DE-604)BV000005831 11 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008948102&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Wrightsman, Lawrence S. 1931- Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? Perspectives in law and psychology Decision Making Jurisprudence Psychology - legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspraak gtt Rechtsvinding gtt Psychologie Recht Decision Making United States Judges United States Judicial process United States Jurisprudence United States Law Psychological aspects Psychology legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspsychologie (DE-588)4177258-1 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4177258-1 (DE-588)4115710-2 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? |
title_auth | Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? |
title_exact_search | Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? |
title_full | Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? Lawrence S. Wrightman |
title_fullStr | Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? Lawrence S. Wrightman |
title_full_unstemmed | Judicial decision making is psychology relevant? Lawrence S. Wrightman |
title_short | Judicial decision making |
title_sort | judicial decision making is psychology relevant |
title_sub | is psychology relevant? |
topic | Decision Making Jurisprudence Psychology - legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspraak gtt Rechtsvinding gtt Psychologie Recht Decision Making United States Judges United States Judicial process United States Jurisprudence United States Law Psychological aspects Psychology legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspsychologie (DE-588)4177258-1 gnd Rechtsprechung (DE-588)4115710-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Decision Making Jurisprudence Psychology - legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspraak Rechtsvinding Psychologie Recht Decision Making United States Judges United States Judicial process United States Jurisprudence United States Law Psychological aspects Psychology legislation & jurisprudence United States Rechtspsychologie Rechtsprechung USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008948102&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV000005831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrightsmanlawrences judicialdecisionmakingispsychologyrelevant |