Building better products with finite element analysis:
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Santa Fe, NM
Onword Press
1999
|
Ausgabe: | 1st. edition |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | xxxii, 587 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
ISBN: | 156690160X |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV012495278 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20240719 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 990412s1999 a||| |||| 00||| engod | ||
020 | |a 156690160X |9 1-56690-160-X | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)39291767 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV012495278 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-91G |a DE-703 |a DE-1047 |a DE-898 |a DE-706 | ||
050 | 0 | |a TA347.F5 | |
082 | 0 | |a 620/.001/51535 |2 21 | |
084 | |a SK 910 |0 (DE-625)143270: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a ZI 3310 |0 (DE-625)156381: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a MAS 045f |2 stub | ||
084 | |a MAT 674f |2 stub | ||
100 | 1 | |a Adams, Vince |d 1963- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1146215606 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Building better products with finite element analysis |c Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a Finite element analysis |
250 | |a 1st. edition | ||
264 | 1 | |a Santa Fe, NM |b Onword Press |c 1999 | |
300 | |a xxxii, 587 Seiten |b Illustrationen, Diagramme | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
650 | 4 | |a Finite element method | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Finite-Elemente-Methode |0 (DE-588)4017233-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Produktentwicklung |0 (DE-588)4139402-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a CAD |0 (DE-588)4069794-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a CAD |0 (DE-588)4069794-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Finite-Elemente-Methode |0 (DE-588)4017233-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Produktentwicklung |0 (DE-588)4139402-1 |D s |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Finite-Elemente-Methode |0 (DE-588)4017233-8 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Askenazi, Abraham |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008482851&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008482851 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1805087946484744192 |
---|---|
adam_text |
List of Figures and Tables xxii
Introduction xxix
Who Will Benefit From This Book xxix
New FEA Users xxx
Experienced FEA Users xxx
All Engineers xxx
Managers and Supervisors xxx
How This Book Is Organized xxxi
The Importance of "Classical Engineering" xxxii
Introduction to FEA and the Analytical Method 1
Chapter 1: Introduction to FEA
in the Product Design Process 3
A Brief History of Computer aided Engineering 4
Enter the Design Analyst 7
Rapid Product Development Process 8
Who Should Use FEA? 15
Pointing FEA in the Right Direction 16
Analytical Problem Solving Process 17
Process 17
What is the goal of the analysis? 17
Predictive engineering versus failure verification 18
Trend analysis versus absolute data 18
Selecting required output data 19
What input is required for the solution
and what level of uncertainty does it introduce? 19
What is the most efficient means to solve the problem? 20
Introduction to the Assumptive Approach 20
Common Misconceptions About FEA 21
Meshing is Everything 21
FEA Replaces Testing 22
Finite Element Analysis is Easy 23
Finite Element Analysis Is Hard 24
Learning the Interface Equals Learning FEA 25
Summary 25
v/ Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis
Chapter 2: Fundamentals 27
First Principles 27
Body Under External Loading 27
Area Moments of Inertia 31
Definitions 32
Stress and Strain 34
What Is Stress? 35
Principal Stresses 36
Strain 38
Principal Strain 39
Fundamental Stress States 40
Stress in Flexure 40
Stress in Shear 43
Stress in Torsion 44
Stress in Pressure 46
Stress in Contact 48
Stress in Thermal Expansion 50
Stress Concentration Factors 51
Material Properties 52
Types of Materials 52
Common Material Properties 53
Ductile versus Brittle Material Behavior 55
Safety Factor 56
Failure Modes 57
Results Interpretation 57
Typical Failure Modes 57
Classic Failure Theories 58
Ductile Failure Theory 59
Brittle Failure Theory 60
Other Failure Theories 62
Buckling 62
Fatigue 66
Creep 70
Dynamic Analysis 72
Modal Analysis 72
Frequency Response Analysis 80
Transient Response Analysis 84
Summary 87
Chapter 3: FEA Capabilities and Limitations 89
Actual Performance versus FEA Results 90
How FEA Calculates Data 93
Contents vii
ASimple Model 94
H elements versus P elements 97
Correctness versus Accuracy 99
The Correct Answer 99
The Accurate Answer 99
Key Assumptions in FEA for Design 100
Four Primary Assumptions 100
Geometry 100
Properties 101
Mesh 102
Boundary Conditions 102
Linear Static Assumption 103
Linear 103
Material Properties 104
Geometry Concerns 104
Boundary Conditions 105
Using the Linear Assumption 105
Static Assumption 105
Transient Response 106
Frequency Response 107
Random Response 107
Using the Static Assumption 107
Other Commonly Used Assumptions 108
Geometry 108
Material Properties 109
Boundary Conditions 110
Fasteners Ill
General Ill
Summary 112
Finite Element Modeling Basics 113
Chapter 4: Common Model and Element Types 115
Common Modeling Types 116
Plane Stress Modeling 117
Identifying Plane Stress Models 117
Geometry in a Plane Stress Model 118
Plane Strain Modeling 120
Axisymmetric Modeling 121
Orientation of an Axisymmetric Model 123
vf/f Building Better Products w/ffi Finite Element Analysis
Identifying an Axisymmetric Model 124
Loading 125
Constraints 126
Symmetry 127
Reflective Symmetry 128
Near symmetry 128
Loading 129
Constraints 129
Cyclic Symmetry 130
Boundary Conditions 131
Using Reflective Symmetry to Approximate Cyclic Symmetry 131
Anti symmetry 133
Additional Benefits of Symmetry 134
Beam Models 135
Two Basic Types of Beam Elements 136
Rod Elements 136
Beam Elements 136
Beam Coordinate System 137
Stress Recovery in Beams 138
Beams in Torsion 139
Convergence 140
Section Orientation 140
Plate and Shell Modeling 141
Shell Element Basics 141
Orientation 142
Stress Recovery 144
Identifying Shell Model Candidates 145
Accuracy 149
Special Shell Elements 150
Additional Benefits 151
Solid Element Modeling 152
Identifying Solid Model Candidates 152
Solid Element Basics 153
Tet versus Brick Meshes 154
Solid Modeling Tips 154
Special Elements 155
Spring Elements 155
Damper Elements 156
Mass Elements 157
Mass Moment of Inertia 158
Rigid Elements 159
Uses of Rigid Elements 160
Contact Modeling 160
Contents ix
Gap Elements 161
Gap Elements as Cables 163
Slide Line Elements 163
Slide Lines in 3D Contact 164
General Contact Elements 166
Friction in Contact Elements 166
Crack Tip Elements 167
Part versus Assembly Modeling 167
Component Contribution Analysis 168
Turning the One Disadvantage into an Advantage 169
Considering Interactions in Terms of Boundary Conditions 169
Isolating the Performance of Each Part 170
Keep It Simple 171
Transitional Meshing 171
Use Test Models to Debug Idealizations 173
Summary 173
Chapter 5: CAD Modeling for FEA 175
Design versus Analytical Model 176
Building CAD Models for Eventual FEA Use 179
Solid Chunky Parts 180
Building Clean Geometry 181
Short Edges 182
Sliver Surfaces 184
Voids in Solids 186
High Order Surfaces and Edges 187
Corrupt Geometric Definition 188
Parent child Relationships 189
Guidelines for Part Simplification 191
Guidelines for Geometry Planning 192
Additional Considerations 192
Working with Existing Geometry 193
Geometry Guidelines for Working with Existing Geometry 193
Symmetry 193
Boundary Condition Adjustments 194
Feature Suppression versus Submodeling 196
Feature Suppression 198
Submodeling 201
Mid plane Extraction 203
Adjusting Features 204
Knowing When to Bail 205
Working with Limited Geometry Tools 206
x • Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis
Developing Geometry Specifically for Analysis 208
Start Simple 208
The Burden of Commitment 209
Guidelines for Analytical Geometry 210
Elements and Model Types 210
Plan for Boundary Conditions 212
Plan for Assembly Features 213
Plan for Automatic Optimization 213
Topology Constraints 214
Relationship Constraints 216
Test the Limits of Geometry Variables 217
Summary 218
Chapter 6: Assigning Properties 219
Introductory Concepts 220
Property Names 220
Comments and Descriptions 221
Colors 221
Material Properties 222
Types of Materials 222
Stiffness Properties 223
Other Properties 223
Units 224
Nonlinear Material Properties 224
General Element Properties 225
Beams 225
Advanced Beam Properties 227
Shells 228
Advanced Shell Properties 228
Solids 229
Special Element Properties 229
Mass Elements 229
Springs 231
Dampers 231
Contact Elements 231
Gap Elements 232
Slide Line Elements 233
Friction 233
Summary 233
Chapter 7: Finite Element Model Building 235
Setting UpfheModel 236
Grouping and Layering 236
Contents xi
Resource Requirements 236
Element Selection 237
Manual versus Automatic Meshing 238
Modeling Speed 238
Solution Speed 239
Accuracy 239
Convergence 239
Perception 240
Manual and Automatic Mixed Meshes 240
P elements and H elements 240
Meshing Beam Models 241
Guidelines for Beam Element Size 241
Other Beam Modeling Issues 242
Meshing Shell Models 242
Other Methods of Creating Shell Models 245
Element Shape Quality 246
Mapped Meshing 247
Biasing a Mesh 247
Transitioning Mesh Densities 248
Controlling a P element Mesh 249
Manual Meshing of Solid Models 249
Methods for Meshing Solids 250
Extruding and Revolving Surface Meshes 250
Automeshing Solids 251
Element Quality Issues 252
Meshing a Solid Model 253
Debugging a Failed Automesh 254
Transition Elements 255
Rigid Elements 255
Constraint Equations 257
Summary 257
Chapter 8: Boundary Conditions 259
What Are Boundary Conditions? 261
A Simple Example 261
Types of Boundary Conditions 263
Spatial versus Elemental Degrees of Freedom 264
Boundary Conditions and Accuracy 264
Overconstrained Models 265
Redundant Constraints 265
Excessive Constraints 266
Coupled Strain Effects 267
xii Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis
Understiffened Models 270
Underconstrained Models 270
Insufficient Part Stiffness 270
Local versus Global Accuracy 271
Singularities 271
Bracketing Boundary Conditions 274
Review of General Boundary Condition Concepts 276
Preparing Geometry for Boundary Conditions 276
Applying Boundary Conditions to Geometry 276
Using Load and Constraint Sets 277
Coordinate Systems 278
Constraints 280
Constraints on Different Element Types 281
Conditional Equilibrium 282
Symmetry 282
Enforced Displacement 285
Loads 288
Units 288
Load Distribution 289
Load Orientation 291
Nonlinear Forces 291
Types of Loads 292
Forces and Moments 292
Pressure Loads 293
Acceleration Loads 294
Temperature Loads 294
Checking Applied Loads 295
Comparison of Boundary Condition Schemes 295
Summary 300
Chapter 9: Solving the Model 303
Multiple Load and Constraint Cases 304
Final Model Checb 305
Free Node Check 306
Model Continuity Check 306
Sanity Checks 308
Material Properties 308
Boundary Conditions 308
Mass 308
System Resources 309
Element Check 310
When the Solution Fails 310
Contents x/ii
Insufficient System Resources 310
Insufficiently Constrained Models 311
Solve Model for First Mode 311
Abrupt Change in Stiffness 312
Summary 312
Chapter 10: Convergence 313
Importance of Convergence 313
Understanding Convergence 314
Uncertainty versus Error 317
Error Estimates 317
Relating Error Estimates to Convergence 319
More Examples 320
P elements versus H elements 322
Element Quality versus Convergence 323
Summary 324
Chapter 11: Displaying and Interpreting Results 325
Method for Viewing Results 326
Displacement Results 326
Animation 326
Magnitude of Deformed Shape 328
Stress Results 329
Fringe Quality 330
Convergence 331
Stress Magnitude 331
Centroidal versus Corner Stress 332
Entire Model versus Individual Components or Groups 333
Types of Output Data 334
Displacements 334
Rotations 334
Velocities and Accelerations 334
Strain Quantities 335
Max, Mid, Min Principal Strain 335
Normal and Shear Strain 335
Shell Membrane and Transverse Shear Strain 335
Strain Energy 336
Stress Quantities 336
Max, Mid, Min Principal Stress 336
Normal and Shear Stresses 336
Von Mises Stress 337
Reaction and Resultant Forces and Moments 338
xjy Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis
Line Element Results 338
Strain and Stress 338
Resultant Force and Moments 339
Rigid Element Forces 339
Shell Element Results 340
Location 340
Measures ^40
Types of Results Displays 340
Animation 341
Fringe 341
Averaged versus Unaveraged versus Continuous Tone 342
Isolines and Isosurfaces 343
Query 344
Vector Plots 345
Orientation of Principal Stress 345
Graphs 346
Results Interpretation: Quality Inspection and Verification Techniques 347
Convergence Issues 347
Correlation to Expectations (Common Sense) 347
Qualification and Review of Assumptions 348
Correlation to Closed Form Equations 348
Use of Test Models 349
Correlation to Testing 349
Relation to Problem Goals 350
Bulk Calculations on Results 350
Combined Load Sets 350
Fatigue Estimates 351
Mohr's Criterion 352
Summary 353
Chapter 12: Optimization: Tying It All Together 355
Engineering versus Analysis 355
Avoiding "Emotional Commitment" 356
Optimization 357
Ask Questions 357
Phase I Optimization: Brainstorming 359
Extrusion 366
Injection Molding 367
Sheet Metal Weldment 368
Phase II Optimization: Fine Tuning 371
Summary 374
Contents xv
Advanced Modeling Techniques and Applications 377
Chapter 13: Modeling Assemblies and Weldments 379
Design Model versus Analysis Model 380
Assembly Type Controls Usability of CAD Model 380
Continuous Load Bearing Structures 381
Jointed Assemblies with Free Degrees of Freedom 383
Mixed Assembly Modeling 385
Realistic Interpretation of Local Joint Results 386
Component Contribution Analysis 387
Treat Continuous Subassemblies as Single Component 387
Use Free Body Diagrams or Kinematics to Develop Boundary Conditions . 387
Optimize Each Component on Its Own Merits 388
Combine into Assemblies One Component at a Time 388
Use Test Models of Joints 389
Identify Fasteners Requiring Detailed Results 389
Consider Submodeling for More Detailed Local Results 389
Examine Results Local to Each Joint 389
Review Performance of Each Part at Each Step 390
Review Complete Assembly for Conformance to Global Expectations 390
Submodel Portions of System Using Assembly Reactions 390
Modeling Continuous Load Bearing Assemblies 391
Solid Assemblies 391
Weldments 391
Bolted Castings or Machined Parts 393
Sheet Metal Assemblies 394
Weldments 394
Continuous Welds 394
Skip or Partial Welds 395
Plug or Spot Welds 395
Riveted or Bolted Assemblies 396
More on Continuous Assemblies 396
Plastic Assemblies 396
Printed Circuit Boards 397
Construction Assemblies 398
Modeling Jointed Interfaces 399
Identify Critical Information Up Front 399
Rotational Joints 400
Bolts, Rivets, and Pins 401
Detailed Fastener Interfaces 402
Rotational Bearings 404
xyj Building Belter Products with Finite Element Analysis
Translational Joints 407
Sliding Contact 407
Linear Bearings 408
Guide Pins and Rods 409
Slots 409
Summary 409
Chapter 14: Thermal ExpansionAnalysis 411
Thermal Expansion Basics 412
Material Properties 412
Boundary Conditions 414
Local Temperature Loads 414
Constraints 415
Other Uses for Thermal Expansion 415
Modeling Weld Stress 415
Injection Molded Part Shrinkage 417
Press fit Analysis 419
Spring Preload 421
Example of Incorrectly Used Thermal Expansion 421
Summary 423
Chapter 15: Nonlinear Analysis 425
Basic Concepts in Nonlinear Analysis 426
Why Use Nonlinear Analysis? 426
Exact Performance Data Required 427
Contact Is Inevitable 427
Large Displacement in Flexible Parts 428
Detailed Stress Input to Fatigue Analyses 428
Manufacturing and Forming Simulation 428
Identifying Nonlinear Behavior 428
Fundamental Conditions of Linearity 429
Stress strain 429
Strain Displacement 429
Load Continuity 429
Common Symptoms of Nonlinear Behavior 430
Stress Levels Approach the Yield Point 430
Coupled Displacements Are Restrained 431
Large Displacements Are Expected 431
Unreasonably High Deflections Are Observed 431
Two Surfaces or Curves Penetrate 432
Direct versus Iterative Solutions 432
Overview of Nonlinear Solution Algorithm 433
Load Cases, Load Steps, and Convergence 433
Load Steps 433
Contents xvli
Load Cases 435
Methods for Updating Model Stiffnesses 436
Three Common Types of Nonlinear Behavior 438
Material Nonlinearity 439
Material Definitions 439
Revisiting Young's Modulus 439
Yield Criteria 440
Hardening Rules 440
Commonly Used Material Models 441
Geometric Nonlinearity 445
Using Geometric Nonlinear FEA 446
Boundary Nonlinearity 447
Contact 447
Follower Forces 448
Other Types of Nonlinearity 448
Hyperelastic 448
Nonlinear Transient 449
Creep 450
Nonlinear Buckling Analysis 450
Bulk Metal Forming 451
Nonlinear Results Data 451
Nonlinear Solution Methodology 452
Use Test Models to Debug Materials or Contact 452
Building and Running Model as Linear System 453
Set Up Nonlinear Solution Parameters 454
Run Nonlinear Analysis with Large Displacements 455
Run Contact Conditions 455
Enable Nonlinear Material Model 456
When Convergence Is Not Obtained 456
Finite Element Modeling for Nonlinear Analysis 457
Modeling Nonlinear Behavior with Linear Tools 460
Moderately Nonlinear Large Displacements 460
Moderately Nonlinear Material Problems 461
Use Linear Methods to Simulate Contact 461
Springs 462
Constraints 462
Reaction Forces 463
Multipoint Constraints 463
Summary 463
Chapter 16: Buckling Analysis 465
Possible Scenarios 466
Accuracy Issues 467
xyi',1 Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis
Simple Buckling Analyses and Correlation to Theory 468
Summary 475
Chapter 17: Modal Analysis 477
A Simple Modal Analysis 478
Basicsof Modal Analysis 479
Reasons to Perform Modal Analyses 480
Boundary Conditions 482
Preparing for a Dynamic Analysis 483
Dealing with Resonant Frequencies 484
Meshing a Part for Modal Analyses 484
Other Uses for Modal Analyses 486
Summary 487
Chapter 18: Dynamic Analysis 489
Frequency Response 490
Definitions 490
Input 491
Constraints 492
Phase Offset 492
Amplitude Offset 493
Frequency Response Results 494
Revisiting Amplitude Offsets 494
Transient Response 495
Input 495
Constraints 495
Solution Parameters 495
Results Output 496
Random Response 496
Solution Methods 497
Constraints 498
Modal versus Direct Solvers 498
Damping 500
Summary 501
[ftelitr 0
Integrating Simulation into Product Design Strategy 503
Chapter 19: Overview of Popular Industry Offerings 505
Packaging 506
Contents xix
Three Key Components of Any FEA Solution 506
Preprocessor 507
Solver 507
Postprocessor 508
Open Systems 508
Integrated Systems 509
CAD embedded Systems 510
Proprietary Systems 510
Options 511
Contact Information for Vendors 530
Chapter 20: Key Elements
of a Successful FEA Implementation 531
Key Success Factor: Evaluation 532
Economic Needs 532
Cost of Delay 532
Product Development Costs 533
Missed Sales 533
Lost Market Share 533
Summarizing Cost of Delay 535
Product Musts versus Product Wants 535
Product Musts 535
Product Wants 536
Summarizing the Economic Benefits of FEA 536
Technological Needs 537
Personnel Resources 538
Give Users the Best Chance to Succeed 539
Should Designers Be Doing FEA? 539
Project Schedule Resources 541
Hardware Resources 542
RAM Requirements 542
Hard Disk Requirements 542
Swap Space 542
Scratch Space 543
Storage Space 544
Graphics Cards 545
System Data Bus 545
Hardware Evaluation Summary 545
Evaluating FEA Suppliers 546
Evaluating FEA Systems 546
CAD Compatibility 547
Finite Element Modeling: The Preprocessor 548
Solution Accuracy 548
xx Building Better Products with Finite Element Analysis
Support and Training 548
Key Success Factor: Implementation 549
Implementation Plan 549
Training 550
Internal Training and Coaching Programs 550
External Training and Coaching 551
Choosing a Coach 551
After All That 553
Initial Project 554
Management Buy in 554
Key Success Factor: Verification 554
Economic Verification 554
Technical Verification 555
A Practical Verification Process 555
Summary 556
Chapter 21: Trends
and Predictions for the Future of FEA 559
Faster Computing Speed and Algorithms 559
Self adapting, Self converging Technologies 560
Multiphysics, Multisolution Technologies 560
CAD embedded Systems 561
Other Advancing Technologies 561
Internet Based Support, Training, and Solvers 561
Windows NT/UNIX Convergence 562
Automation Technologies for Results Verification 562
More Accessible Use of Manufacturing Technologies 563
Sophisticated Bulk Calculations on Results 563
Improved Optimization Algorithms 563
Summary 564
Bibliography 566
Index 568
Fig. 1.1. Tensile testing was performed by
Galileo 4
Fig. 1.2. Railroad engineering utilized truss
calculations and drove the development of
fatigue analysis methods 4
Fig. 1.3. Actua rapid prototyping equipment
from 3D Systems 9
Fig. 1.4. Solid model built in SolidWorks. . 10
Fig. 1.5. Relative acceptance and age of the three
enabling technologies 11
Fig. 1.6. Traditional product development
process 12
Fig. 1.7. Relative cost of product change at the
different stages of the design process 13
Fig. 1.8. Cost versus knowledge dilemma. 13
Fig. 1.9. Product development using predictive
engineering 14
Fig. 1.10. Improved tracking of cost versus
product knowledge with simulation 14
Fig. 2.1. General free body diagram (a).
Resultant forces and moments (b).
Second law equivalent (c) 28
Fig. 2.2. Uniaxial spring and damper system (a).
Planar body motion (b) 30
Fig. 2.3. Submerged wall (a). Beam in pure
bending (b). Bar in pure torsion (c) 32
Fig. 2.4. Rectangular and polar moments of
inertia (a). Parallel axis theorem (b) 32
Fig. 2.5. General stress elements in
equilibrium 35
Fig. 2.6. General plane stress element (a).
Orientation of principal stress (b).
Orientation of maximum shear stress (c). 36
Fig. 2.7. Mohr's circle diagram for plane
stress (a) and triaxial stress (b) 38
Fig. 2.8. Deformation of a uniform bar
under uniaxial loading 38
Fig. 2.9. FEA of a beam in flexure 40
Fig. 2.10. Straight beam in flexure 41
Fig. 2.11. Curved beam in flexure 42
Fig. 2.12. FEA of a cantilever beam in shear. 43
Fig. 2.13. Straight rectangular section beam
in shear 43
Fig. 2.14. FEA of a round bar in torsion. . 44
Kg. 2.15. Solid round bar in torsion 44
Fig. 2.16. FEA of a thick cylinder under
pressure 46
Fig. 2.17. Cylinder under pressure (a). Press fit
cylinders (b) 46
Fig. 2.18. FEA of two spheres in contact 48
Fig. 2.19. Forced contact of two spheres (a)
and two cylinders (b) 48
Fig. 2.20. FEA of a shaft subject to a temperature
change with the ends fully constrained. . .50
Fig. 2.21. FEA of a drilled plate under tension. 51
Fig. 2.22. Typical engineering stress strain
diagram of a ductile material specimen subject
to uniaxial tensile loading 54
Fig. 2.23. Comparison of three ductile failure
theories 60
Fig. 2.24. Comparison of three brittle failure
theories 61
Fig. 2.25. Effective length factors for common
end conditions of centrally loaded columns. 63
Fig. 2.26. Critical stress in columns as a function
of slenderness ratio 64
Fig. 2.27. Buckling FEA of a complex shell
structure 65
Fig. 2.28. Eccentrically loaded column (a).
Maximum unit load for different values of
load eccentricity and column slenderness
ratio (b) 65
Fig. 2.29. Typical S N diagram for steel 66
Fig. 2.30. Sinusoidal fluctuating stress, amplitude
versus time 68
Fig. 2.31. Stages of creep failure 71
Fig. 2.32. Free vibration of a cantilever beam,
first mode 73
Fig. 2.33. Free vibration of systems which are
overdamped, critically damped (a), or
underdamped in cases where 0O = Ao and
60=0(b) 75
Fig. 2.34. Discretized beam model with 3D spring
and damper systems 77
Fig. 2.35. Modal FEA of a cantilever beam, first
four modes 78
Fig. 2.36. Two degree of freedom system 78
Fig. 2.37. Damped single degree of freedom
system subject to harmonic excitation 81
xxif Building Bette
Fig. 2.38. Magnification factor and phase angle
versus frequency ratio for different damping
ratios of single degree of freedom systems
subject to harmonic excitation 82
Fig. 2.39. Transient response FEA of a cantilever
beam subject to a harmonic excitation applied
perpendicularly at its free end 86
Fig. 3.1. Cantilevered beam geometry 91
Fig. 3.2. Dimensional laser scan of a part
overlayed on the actual CAD geometry. . 92
Fig. 3.3. Schematic representation of a two
spring system 94
Fig. 3.4 Simple p element mesh 98
Fig. 3.5. Solid p element mesh 98
Fig. 4.1. Plane stress idealization of simply
supported beam 117
Fig. 4.2. Plane stress model of plastic clip
feature 118
Fig. 4.3. Plane stress model of cable retainer
with multiple wall thicknesses 118
Fig. 4.4. Plane stress model of a spur gear
mesh 119
Fig. 4.5. Equivalent solid model of the
retainer 120
Fig. 4.6. Plane strain idealization of long
pipe under constant pressure 121
Fig. 4.7. Axisymmetric model of a pressure
vessel 122
Fig. 4.8. Axisymmetric model of the forming
of a calculator battery assembly. 122
Fig. 4.9. Axisymmetric model
of an engine valve stem 123
Fig. 4.10. Axisymmetric model of a hydraulic
cylinder piston 123
Fig. 4.11. Solid CAD model of steel hole
punch 124
Fig. 4.12. Axisymmetric analyses of hole
punch (a) without hole feature and (b)
with hole cutout 125
Fig. 4.13. CAD solid model of pressure
vessel lid 126
Fig. 4.14. Four constraint conditions and
resulting displacement plots for the
pressure vessel lid 127
Fig. 4.15. Three symmetry planes for a domed
pressure vessel with the section required
for an internal pressure load 128
Fig. 4.16. GAD solid model of stamped
flange 129
r Products with Finite Element Analysis
Tig. 4.17. Fan blade and hub model 130
Fig. 4.18. Turbine blade model with cyclic
symmetry instance exploded 130
Fig. 4.19. Flywheels undergo windup in the
transient portion of start up and are good
candidates for cyclic symmetry 130
Fig. 4.20. Cyclic symmetry can be used on
an instance of a motor rotor 131
Fig. 4.21. Cyclic symmetry concepts can be
simulated with planar symmetry in this
press fit model 132
Fig. 4.22. An odd number of features in
an otherwise symmetric model can be
simulated with radial cut planes as long
as the loading is radial 132
Fig. 4.23. Construction of anti symmetry
results 133
Fig. 4.24. Ring under internal pressure with a
point constraint at the bottom and symmetry
constraints. The smaller internal ring is the
undeformed model for reference 134
Fig. 4.25. Full shell model of stamped flange
with symmetry constraints on the
appropriate planes 135
Fig. 4.26. Schematic representation of a rod
element 136
Fig. 4.27. Beam element coordinate system. 137
Fig. 4.28. Linear (a), quadratic (b), and
p element (c) beam elements 138
Fig. 4.29. Stress recovery points for an
I beam cross section in FEMAP 139
Fig. 4.30. A displacement plot showing the
difference in torsional stiffness of a closed
tube (a), and a split tube with the free end
constrained to remain planar (b) 140
Fig. 4.31. The orientation of a section greatly
affects its ability to carry a bending load. . 141
Fig. 4.32. Linear and quadratic shell
element types 142
Fig. 4.33. Shell mid planes can be offset to
better capture thickness variations or a
stack of plates 143
Fig. 4.34. Tapered or drafted walls can be
modeled with (i) tapered shell elements,
(ii) a median thickness, or (iii) a stepped
thickness reduction 143
Fig. 4.35. Normals of shell elements in this bottle
model point inward 144
Fig. 4.36. If shell normals are not consistent,
discontinuities in stress results may appear. 145
List of Figures
Fig. 4.37. "Virtual" overlap of the shell
geometry as interpreted by the solver. . 146
Fig. 4.38. Steps required to break an I beam
cross section into a shell model 147
Fig. 4.39. Thick walled weldments may not be
good shell model candidates 148
Fig. 4.40. Solid CAD model of a cast cross
brace 148
Fig. 4.41. Stress results of a shell model of the
cast cross brace 148
Fig. 4.42. Plane stress model of thin walled
panel 149
Fig. 4.43. Solid model of thin walled panel. 149
Fig. 4.44. Shell model of thin walled panel. 150
Fig. 4.45. Local mesh refinement of shell
model near cutout 151
Fig. 4.46. Chunky solid CAD models are likely
candidates for solid FEA models 152
Fig. 4.47. Common solid element shapes. . 153
Fig. 4.48. Comparison of an automeshed valve
stem to a revolved brick mesh 154
Fig. 4.49. Spring elements can be used in a
simulation in the same way as they are used
in the actual part 156
Fig. 4.50. Schematic representation
of damper element 157
Fig. 4.51. Mass element tied to vertical plate
with rigid links 157
Fig. 4.52. Pro/ENGINEER mass property
listing for solid part 158
Fig. 4.53. Use rigid elements to distribute
beam moments at the correct footprint
on a shell model 159
Fig. 4.54. Rigid elements enable meshes of
dissimilar densities to be quickly connected. 160
Fig. 4.55. Gap element orientation 161
Fig. 4.56. Gap elements ensure that the load
transfer beyond the root of the weld is
correct 162
Fig. 4.57. Gap elements enable shaft to transmit
load to retaining bore 162
Fig. 4.58. Slide line contact regions required to
model battery assembly 163
Fig. 4.59. Slide line elements allow spur gear
teeth to load each other naturally 164
Fig. 4.60. This sliced hemisphere can contact
the plate in three dimensions using radially
oriented slide lines 165
XXIII
Fig. 4.61. This automotive bumper can
contact the pole correctly using parallel
slide lines 165
Fig. 4.62. General 3D contact regions are
required to model impact between
crossing cylinders 166
Fig. 4.63. Schematic representation of friction
correlation fixture 167
Fig. 4.64. Pulley and mount assembly 168
Fig. 4.65. Solid element analysis of shaft
component 168
Fig. 4.66. Shaft loading will produce a 'Y1
moment and a 'Z' lateral shear load on the
flange 169
Fig. 4.67. Load path to base causes moments
in both 'V and 'Z' with the 'X' oriented
lateral shear 170
Fig. 4.68. Special handling is required to
transition solid shaft to shell flange mesh. 171
Fig. 4.69. Depending on its geometry, a single
part may need to transition from one
element type to another 172
Fig. 4.70. Pressure loading on the gusset will
cause significantly different displacements if
the shell solid transition is ignored (a) and
correctly adjusted for load transfer (b). . 172
Fig. 4.71. Test model of transitioning mesh
as a continuous solid can aid in results
interpretation 173
Fig. 5.1. Potato shaped parts usually mesh
cleanly and solve well with automeshed
tetrahedrons 178
Fig. 5.2. Parts similar to this one must clearly
be modeled with solid elements 181
Fig. 5.3. Designer's choice of feature size
controls the creation of dirty geometry. . 182
Fig. 5.4. Short edges on large faces can cause
highly distorted elements or a failed mesh. 182
Fig. 5.5. This short edge was created by the
proximity of two nearly aligned surfaces. . 183
Fig. 5.6. Sloppy geometry creation often
causes small cracks or gaps in faces that are
difficult to visually detect 184
Fig. 5.7. These two cylindrical features are
offset only slightly 184
Fig. 5.8. As the two curved edges approach
each other, a surface dimension much
smaller than any part feature is created. 185
xxiV Building Beth
Fig. 5.9. More thought on aligning these two
features would have eliminated the sliver
surface 185
Fig. 5.10. Sliver surface caused by a slightly
undersized fillet 186
Fig. 5.11. A fillet across this shallow angle has
created a difficult meshing situation 186
Fig. 5.12. It is extremely easy to accidentally
create voids in a solid model while
designing a new part 187
Fig. 5.13. A p element mesher which maps
the element definition to the geometry
definition is highly sensitive to any type of
inconsistency 188
Fie. 5.14. Always try to avoid fragile dimensions
such as depicted here 190
Fig. 5.15 Distributing load across bolt head
or washer diameter can be achieved with
patches 195
Fig. 5.16. While the actual location of the
supporting beam represented by the
rectangular patch might be off the part edge
by a wall thickness or two, this small
adjustment should not affect the reliability
of die shell model 195
Fig. 5.17. Proper orientation of split surfaces
facilitates the application of loads 196
Fig. 5.18. The mounting tab on this connector
can easily be decoupled for submodeling. 197
Fig. 5.19. Connecting rod can be divided into
two separate studies due to uniaxial nature
of loading 198
Fig. 5.20. Initial geometry can be coarser. . 199
Fig. 5.21. As behavior of part is clearer,
fillets are added to ensure that the stress
distribution captured is correct 199
Fig. 5.22. The final analysis can have a much
tighter mesh because a considerable amount
of detail was removed from areas with no
structural concerns 200
Fig. 5.23. The overall size of this part is so
large in comparison to its wall thickness that
a mid plane model will behave nearly the
same as a mesh on the outer surface 203
Fig. 5.24. The time spent developing a
mid plane surface of this geometry would
probably not pay off. 203
Fig. 5.25. This thick walled part is questionable
from a shell modeling standpoint, but must
certainly be modeled at mid plane in order
to achieve any level of accuracy 204
w Products with Finite Element Analysis
Fig. 5.26. Solid model corrupted by IGES
transfer 206
Fig. 5.27. With corrupted surfaces removed
and rebuilt, the part is ready to mesh. . . . 207
Fig. 5.28. One rib pattern may appear visually
to provide the best stiffness 208
Fig. 5.29. However, a drastically different pattern
might actually be the better choice 209
Fig. 5.30. A simple beam model can quickly
allow you to evaluate options, whereas a
solid model of the wire rack would be
nearly impossible to mesh and solve 211
Fig. 5.31. This shell model can be modified
quickly and easily in pusuit of an optimal
design 211
Fig. 5.32. A simple representation of a solid
can be meshed with brick elements for a
quick and reliable study 212
Fig. 5.33. Use surface patches to aid in
aligning assembly components 213
Fig. 5.34. New bracket design must have
mounting features as shown and fit within
the specified envelope 214
Fig. 5.35. Evaluate drastically different
approaches independently instead of
trying to develop a single model that can
capture all possibilities 215
Fig. 5.36. Holes shown in configuration at left
can "merge" to create the larger opening
shown at right if dimensioned properly. . 215
Fig. 5.37. By making the rib height less than
plate thickness, the rib can be made to
"disappear" in an optimization study 216
Fig. 5.38. A simple plate with a rectangular
hole may require more complex
dimensioning for an optimization study
than for detailing a single design 217
Fig. 5.39. Order of creation becomes important
if an optimizer is allowed to adjust the position
of overlapping features 218
Fig. 6.1. Examples of good (a) and not so
good (b) habits for shell property entries
in Pro/MECHANICA 220
Fig. 6.2. FEMAP material property entry
window 223
Fig. 6.3. Plate with stiffeners 227
Fig. 6.4. Inertia modeling comparison: point
mass model without MMOI input (a) versus the
full model (b) 230
Fig. 7.1. Sketch of a sheet metal weldment. 243
List of Figures
Fig. 7.2. Sample 244
Fig. 7.3. Sample 244
Fig. 7.4. Sample 244
Fig. 7.5. Sample 244
Fig. 7.6. Sample 244
Fig. 7.7. Initial mesh on model 245
Fig. 7.8. Plot showing edges of shell elements not
connected to other elements 245
Fig. 7.9. Four element distortion types to be
controlled in the model 246
Fig. 7.10. Trapezoid like surface illustrating
meshing of irregular surface 247
Fig. 7.11. Rectangular surface mesh biased
toward one corner (a), and revolved mesh
biased toward axis of revolution (b) 248
Fig. 7.12. Mesh showing use of patches to
transition from a tight to a loose mesh. . . 249
Fig. 7.13. Shell model of rubber boot (a),
corrected shell model with normals all
pointing out (b), and final solid mesh (c). 251
Fig. 7.14. Mesh sections illustrating mid side
nodes on linear edge of element (a) and
mid side nodes on the curvature of
geometry (b) 253
Fig. 7.15. Model illustrating slave surface
allowed to slide parallel to master 256
Fig. 7.16. Illustration of proper way to tie shell
mesh to solid mesh with MPCs 257
Fig. 8.1. FEA of motorcycle wheel 260
Fig. 8.2. Simple FEA of seat portion of chair
subject to central loading 262
Fig. 8.3. Revised FEM boundary condition
scheme for chair seat 266
Fig. 8.4. Plane stress model of plate with
coupled strain unrestricted (a) and with
coupled strain restricted (b) 268
Fig. 8.5. FEM and results of joint member at
end of long shaft in tension, using uniaxial
constraint (a) and full constraint at the
modeling cut (b) 268
Fig. 8.6. Comparison of a point load versus
distributed counterpart in a plane
stress model 272
Fig. 8.7. Bracketing the boundary conditions
of a chair analysis, using (a) infinite friction
and (b) no friction 275
Fig. 8.8. User coordinate system types supported
by most analysis codes 278
XXV
Fig. 8.9. Plane stress FEA results of lifting lever
using "incorrect" Cartesian constraint (a)
and "correct" cylindrical constraint (b). . 279
Fig. 8.10. FEA constraints and their geometric
equivalent in classic beam calculations. . . 281
Fig. 8.11. FEMs and results of half symmetry (a)
and quarter symmetry models (b) of joint
member presented in Fig. 8.5 283
Fig. 8.12. Equivalent symmetry constraints for
solid and shell models 285
Fig. 8.13. Enforced displacement fastener
interface 286
Fig. 8.14. Symmetry FEM of shaft clamp with
corresponding results 287
Fig. 8.15. Linear versus follower forces at
end of cantilevered beam 292
Fig. 8.16. Plane stress FEMs of suspension
coupler link using different boundary
conditions 295
Fig. 8.17. Baseline: FEA von Mises stress
results of Fig. 8.16(a). Deformation display
scale factor =1 296
Fig. 8.18. FEA von Mises stress results of Figs.
8.16 (a), (b), and (c). Deformation display
scale factor = 500 297
Fig. 8.19. FEA von Mises stress results of Figs.
8.16 (a), (d) and (e). Deformation display
scale factor = 500 298
Fig. 8.20. FEA von Mises stress results of Figs.
8.16 (a), (f), and (g). Deformation display
scale factor = 500 299
Fig. 9.1. Shell mesh of motor end cap 307
Fig. 9.2. Correct free edge plot of motor end
cap (a), and incorrect free edge plot of
motor end cap showing cracks between
sections of the mesh (b) 307
Fig. 10.1. Rectangle method for determining
the area under a curve 314
Fig. 10.2. Area estimate improves with the
resolution of the rectangles 314
Fig. 10.3. As the number of nodes increases,
the mesh can conform to the geometry
more precisely 315
Fig. 10.4. Simple nodal error estimate 318
Fig. 10.5. Two stress conditions with
seemingly conflicting error estimates. . .318
Fig. 10.6. Convergence of beam in pure
bending 319
Fig. 10.7. Convergence of plate with a hole. 320
xxW Building Beth
Fig. 10.8. Convergence plot and resultant
mesh for a valve handle 321
Fig. 10.9. Convergence plot and resultant
mesh for a parts bin 321
Fig. 10.10. P element mesh and convergence
plot of valve handle 322
Fig. 10.11. P element mesh and convergence
plot of parts bin 323
Fig. 11.1. Flowchart of recommended
method for viewing results 326
Fig. 11.2. Pro/MECHANICA FEM of an axially
loaded section of a suspension component (a),
and resulting animation display (b) 327
Fig. 11.3. Pro/MECHANICA displacement
fringe plot of suspension component
section 329
Fig. 11.4. Pro/MECHANICA von Mises stress
results of a tet element automesh (a) and
a hex element hand mesh (b) of a
suspension component section 330
Fig. 11.5. Stress results of an assembly (a),
one of its members (b), and a cut section
of the member (c). This was done using
groups in Pro/MECHANICA 333
Fig. 11.6. Pro/MECHANICA min principal
(a) versus max principal (b) versus von Mises
(c) stress results of a lug analysis 337
Fig. 11.7. Axial (a) versus bending (b) versus
total stress (c) for the same beam model
solution 339
Fig. 11.8. Pro/MECHANICA von Mises stress
results of an intentionally underconverged
analysis of a drilled plate under tension:
standard (a), averaged (b), and continuous
tone (c) 343
Fig. 11.9. Isolines (a) and isosurfaces (b)
of the same model solution 344
Fig. 11.10. Querying within a fringe plot. . .345
Fig. 11.11. Maximum principal stress vector
plot 345
Fig. 11.12. Von Mises stress results for an
analysis of a drilled plate: fringe plot (a),
graph along shell edges following the hole
definition curve (b), and maximum of the
model as a function of polynomial order
(c) 346
Fig. 12.1. Initial design of winch support
machined from a block of steel 358
Fig. 12.2. First design option for casting the
winch mount 359
r Products with Finite Element Analysis
Fig. 12.3. Second design option for casting
the winch mount 359
Fig. 12.4. Third design option for casting
the winch mount 360
Fig. 12.5. A finite element model of the first
design casting option 360
Fig. 12.6. A finite element model of the
second design casting option 360
Fig. 12.7. A finite element model of the third
design casting option 360
Fig. 12.8 Sensitivity plot for the part height
of casting option 1 362
Fig. 12.9 Sensitivity plot for the nominal
wall thickness of casting option 1 362
Fig. 12.10. Sensitivity plot for Young's
modulus and density combined 362
Fig. 12.11. Global sensitivity plot of von Mises
stress versus the angular position of the second
hole in the plate appearing in Fig. 12.12. 364
Fig. 12.12. Plate with two holes used for the
global sensitivity study 364
Fig. 12.13. Global sensitivity study of the first
natural frequency versus part height of
casting option 1 365
Fig. 12.14. Global sensitivity study of the first
natural frequency versus nominal wall
thickness of casting option 1 366
Fig. 12.15. Winch mount geometry suggested
by Hyperstruct 370
Fig. 12.16. Cross section of Hyperstruct
solution of the winch mount 370
Fig. 12.17. 3D parameter space for two
parameters 372
Fig. 12.18. Pro/MECHANICA setup form
for the winch mount optimization 373
Fig. 12.19. Weight versus optimization pass
showing the weight improvement as features
are adjusted. At pass 3, too much material
was removed and a correction can be seen
in the plot 374
Fig. 13.1. Two bolted housings under an axial
tensile load. The narrow flanged part (a)
can be coupled at the entire interface surface
without any loss in model integrity. The wide
flanged part (b) undergoes enough deflection
in the flange to warrant some thought as to
where to join the interface surface with its
mating part 381
List of Figures
Fig. 13.2. Shell model of housing assembly
constructed with different nominal mesh sizes
at the interface surface. If the interface can be
assumed continuous, rigid links can bridge
the two parts for proper load transfer. . 382
Fig. 13.3. Solid model of shaft in journal. . 383
Fig. 13.4. Beam/shell model of shaft in journal
with rigid elements forcing in plane moment
transfer between shaft and plate 384
Fig. 13.5. Two plate models pinned at bases and
loaded with a uniform pressure on the left face.
The assembly in (a) is modeled as if the
coincident edges are welded and (b) is
modeled as if they are hinged. The resulting
deformation is noticeably different 385
Fig. 13.6. Two plates attached with a beam
element representing a bolt. The load at the
end of the bolt is transferred to the plates
with a spider web of rigid elements to
increase the effective surface area 386
Fig. 13.7. Plane stress model of fillet weld in
which vertical plate was too thick for full
penetration 392
Fig. 13.8. Stress distribution in welded section
can be affected by contact conditions
between unwelded surface areas. Case (a)
shows a contact interface, and (b) shows
the joint with no contact 393
Fig. 13.9. Fittings or mounting hardware
can stiffen the interface of two beams. The
additional stiffness of this coupling was
modeled with two plate elements 399
Fig. 13.10. The thin plate in these models is
attached to the stationary frame with a single
fastener on each end (a) and four fasteners
(b). As the number of fasteners increases,
the interface behaves more as if it were
continuous than jointed 401
Fig. 13.11. Symmetry model of pipe clamp
with initial penetration of fastener. All
contact regions noted in the figure are
important to total system response 402
Fig. 13.12. Beam model of shaft tied to plate with
rigid elements to induce moment on plate. 405
Fig. 13.13. Beam model of shaft tied to plate
with stiff springs so that no moment is
transferred to plate 405
Fig. 13.14. Solid model of shaft in journal
with contact conditions between shaft and
ends of bore 406
xxvii
Fig. 13.15. Solid model of shaft in journal with
stiff springs coupling shaft and ends of bore
around entire perimeter of shaft 406
Fig. 13.16. Solid model of shaft in journal with
stiff springs only coupling portions of
interface expected to be in compression. .406
Fig. 14.1. Sample parts intended to work in
extremely hot or cold conditions 412
Fig. 14.2. Plane stress model of two fillet welds
and stress fields calculated by thermal
contraction of beads 416
Fig. 14.3. Tray modeled with isotropic
properties, uniform wall thickness,
and no draft 417
Fig. 14.4. Displacement results of tray
modeled as shell 417
Fig. 14.5. Stress plot for a plane stress model
of plate containing an unrestricted hole. .418
Fig. 14.6. Stress results for a model cooled with
hole radius fixed using a radial constraint
on a cylindrical coordinate system 419
Fig. 14.7. Desired radial press fit of 0.001. . .420
Fig. 14.8. Motor end cap 421
Fig. 14.9. First approach 422
Fig. 14.10. Second approach 422
Fig. 15.1. Newton Raphson method for
stiffness updates 436
Fig. 15.2. Modified Newton Raphson
method can fail when hard 437
Fig. 15.3. Modified Newton Raphson method
can fail when hardening is involved 438
Fig. 15.4. Bilinear material model 441
Fig. 15.5. Trilinear material model 442
Fig. 15.6. Multilinear stress strain curve
and data points that generated the curve. 443
Fig. 15.7. Stress strain curves offset by
temperature and strain rate 443
Fig. 15.8. Flat plate under uniform pressure
with two constraint cases: pinned guided
(a) and pinned pinned (b) 445
Fig. 15.9. Plots of nonlinearity for two
constraint cases described above 446
Fig. 15.10. Rubber and elastomeric parts
require a hyperelastic solution for accurate
simulation 448
Fig. 15.11. Initially distorting elements can
ensure that the final shape will be valid. . 459
xxviii Building Bette
Fig. 15.12. Pressure versus displacement of
uniformly loaded flat plate linear and
nonlinear. 461
Fig. 16.1. Simplified soda can with a 2001b
person standing squarely on top of it. . . . 468
Fig. 16.2. Beam FEA model of the can, and
results of its first buckling mode 470
Fig. 16.3. Shell FEA model of the can, and
results of its first buckling mode 472
Fig. 16.4. 20" soda can, first buckling mode
results of beam FEA and shell FEA 473
Fig. 16.5. 65" and 100" soda can, first buckling
mode results of beam FEA and shell FEA. 474
Fig. 17.1. Simple cantilevered beam model. 478
Fig. 17.2. FEA results of simple beam model.479
Fig. 17.3. Longitudinal mode shape of a
ultrasonic welding horn 481
Fig. 17.4. Stepped cylinder for modal study. 482
r Products with Finite Element Analysis
Fig. 17.5. Schematic representation of two
vibratory modes of free and constrained
cylinder 483
Fig. 17.6. Flat steel disk for symmetry study. 485
Fig. 18.1. Basic components of a dynamic
response analysis 490
Fig. 18.2. Typical frequency versus
amplitude plot 491
Fig. 18.3. Combining static and dynamic results
to produce a nonzero mean output 493
Fig. 18.4. 1994 Nordiridge earthquake data in
time history format (a) and as a power spectral
density format overlaid on the Uniform
Building Code (UBC) PSD standard for
eardiquake design (b) 497
Fig. 18.5. Response amplification at various
damping values as the operating frequency
approaches the first natural frequency. . 501
Table 2.1. Converting principal strain
values to principal stress 40
Table 2.2 Maximum shear stress formulas for
selected standard cross sections 44
Table 2.3. Representative damping ratios. .83
Table 8.1. Boundary'condition singularities
for each element type 273
Table 8.2. Equivalent degrees of freedom in
common coordinate system types 278
Table 8.3. Consistent set of units for standard
steel in I P S and mm N S unit schemes . .288
Table 8.4. Commonly used conversion
factors '. 289
Table 12.1. Summary of casting design
option preliminary analysis results 361
Table 12.2. Range of parameter values used
in full parameter response study 365
Table 13.1. Typical friction factors for
calculating bolt loading 403
Table 14.1. Representative thermal expansion
coefficients for commonly used materials .413
Table 16.1. Analytical buckling results of a
fixed free soda can subject to a coaxial 2001b
compressive load applied to its free rim . 472
Table 17.1. Modal results for a thin disk
using various combinations of symmetry. .486
Table 18.1. Modal method versus direct
method comparison 499
Table 18.2. Representative damping ratios
as percent of critical damping 500
Table 19.1. Overview of selected industry
preprocessors 512
Table 19.2. Overview of selected industry
solvers 525
Table 19.3. Overview of selected industry
postprocessors 527
Table 20.1. Information for evaluating required
FEA solution types and modeling methods
supported by your preprocessor 537 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Adams, Vince 1963- Askenazi, Abraham |
author_GND | (DE-588)1146215606 |
author_facet | Adams, Vince 1963- Askenazi, Abraham |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Adams, Vince 1963- |
author_variant | v a va a a aa |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV012495278 |
callnumber-first | T - Technology |
callnumber-label | TA347 |
callnumber-raw | TA347.F5 |
callnumber-search | TA347.F5 |
callnumber-sort | TA 3347 F5 |
callnumber-subject | TA - General and Civil Engineering |
classification_rvk | SK 910 ZI 3310 |
classification_tum | MAS 045f MAT 674f |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)39291767 (DE-599)BVBBV012495278 |
dewey-full | 620/.001/51535 |
dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
dewey-ones | 620 - Engineering and allied operations |
dewey-raw | 620/.001/51535 |
dewey-search | 620/.001/51535 |
dewey-sort | 3620 11 551535 |
dewey-tens | 620 - Engineering and allied operations |
discipline | Bauingenieurwesen Mathematik Maschinenbau |
edition | 1st. edition |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV012495278</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240719</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">990412s1999 a||| |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">156690160X</subfield><subfield code="9">1-56690-160-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)39291767</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV012495278</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-91G</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA347.F5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">620/.001/51535</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SK 910</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)143270:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZI 3310</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)156381:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAS 045f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MAT 674f</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adams, Vince</subfield><subfield code="d">1963-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1146215606</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Building better products with finite element analysis</subfield><subfield code="c">Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Finite element analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st. edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Fe, NM</subfield><subfield code="b">Onword Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxxii, 587 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finite element method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Finite-Elemente-Methode</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017233-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Produktentwicklung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139402-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">CAD</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069794-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CAD</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069794-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Finite-Elemente-Methode</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017233-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Produktentwicklung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139402-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Finite-Elemente-Methode</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4017233-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Askenazi, Abraham</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008482851&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008482851</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV012495278 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-20T09:00:13Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 156690160X |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008482851 |
oclc_num | 39291767 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-91G DE-BY-TUM DE-703 DE-1047 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 |
owner_facet | DE-91G DE-BY-TUM DE-703 DE-1047 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-706 |
physical | xxxii, 587 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme |
publishDate | 1999 |
publishDateSearch | 1999 |
publishDateSort | 1999 |
publisher | Onword Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Adams, Vince 1963- Verfasser (DE-588)1146215606 aut Building better products with finite element analysis Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi Finite element analysis 1st. edition Santa Fe, NM Onword Press 1999 xxxii, 587 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Finite element method Finite-Elemente-Methode (DE-588)4017233-8 gnd rswk-swf Produktentwicklung (DE-588)4139402-1 gnd rswk-swf CAD (DE-588)4069794-0 gnd rswk-swf CAD (DE-588)4069794-0 s Finite-Elemente-Methode (DE-588)4017233-8 s DE-604 Produktentwicklung (DE-588)4139402-1 s Askenazi, Abraham Verfasser aut HBZ Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008482851&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Adams, Vince 1963- Askenazi, Abraham Building better products with finite element analysis Finite element method Finite-Elemente-Methode (DE-588)4017233-8 gnd Produktentwicklung (DE-588)4139402-1 gnd CAD (DE-588)4069794-0 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4017233-8 (DE-588)4139402-1 (DE-588)4069794-0 |
title | Building better products with finite element analysis |
title_alt | Finite element analysis |
title_auth | Building better products with finite element analysis |
title_exact_search | Building better products with finite element analysis |
title_full | Building better products with finite element analysis Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi |
title_fullStr | Building better products with finite element analysis Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi |
title_full_unstemmed | Building better products with finite element analysis Vince Adams and Abraham Askenazi |
title_short | Building better products with finite element analysis |
title_sort | building better products with finite element analysis |
topic | Finite element method Finite-Elemente-Methode (DE-588)4017233-8 gnd Produktentwicklung (DE-588)4139402-1 gnd CAD (DE-588)4069794-0 gnd |
topic_facet | Finite element method Finite-Elemente-Methode Produktentwicklung CAD |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=008482851&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsvince buildingbetterproductswithfiniteelementanalysis AT askenaziabraham buildingbetterproductswithfiniteelementanalysis AT adamsvince finiteelementanalysis AT askenaziabraham finiteelementanalysis |