Consequences of employment protection?: the case of the Americans with disabilities act
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to accommodate disabled workers and outlaws discrimination against the disabled in hiring, firing, and pay. Although the ADA was meant to increase employment of the disabled, it also increases costs for employers. The net theoretical impac...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
1998
|
Schriftenreihe: | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series
6670 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
Zusammenfassung: | The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to accommodate disabled workers and outlaws discrimination against the disabled in hiring, firing, and pay. Although the ADA was meant to increase employment of the disabled, it also increases costs for employers. The net theoretical impact turns on which provisions of the ADA are most important and how responsive firm entry and exit is to profits. Empirical results using the CPS suggest that the ADA had a negative effect on the employment of disabled men of all working ages and disabled women under age 40. The effects appear to be larger in medium size firms, possibly because small firms were exempt from the ADA. The effects are also larger in states where there have been more ADA-related discrimination charges. Estimates of effects on hiring and firing suggest the ADA reduced hiring of the disabled but did not affect separations. This weighs against a pure firing-costs interpretation of the ADA. Finally, there is little evidence of an impact on the nondisabled, suggesting that the adverse employment consequences of the ADA have been limited to the protected group. |
Beschreibung: | 28 S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV012269533 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19981217 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 981118s1998 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)39932550 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV012269533 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-473 |a DE-19 |a DE-521 |a DE-29 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HB1 | |
084 | |a QB 910 |0 (DE-625)141231: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Acemoglu, Daron |d 1967- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124929575 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Consequences of employment protection? |b the case of the Americans with disabilities act |c Daron Acemoglu ; Joshua Angrist |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |c 1998 | |
300 | |a 28 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 6670 | |
520 | |a The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to accommodate disabled workers and outlaws discrimination against the disabled in hiring, firing, and pay. Although the ADA was meant to increase employment of the disabled, it also increases costs for employers. The net theoretical impact turns on which provisions of the ADA are most important and how responsive firm entry and exit is to profits. Empirical results using the CPS suggest that the ADA had a negative effect on the employment of disabled men of all working ages and disabled women under age 40. The effects appear to be larger in medium size firms, possibly because small firms were exempt from the ADA. The effects are also larger in states where there have been more ADA-related discrimination charges. Estimates of effects on hiring and firing suggest the ADA reduced hiring of the disabled but did not affect separations. This weighs against a pure firing-costs interpretation of the ADA. Finally, there is little evidence of an impact on the nondisabled, suggesting that the adverse employment consequences of the ADA have been limited to the protected group. | ||
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States. |t Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
650 | 7 | |a Discrimination à l'égard des handicapés - Droit - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques |2 ram | |
650 | 7 | |a Handicapés - Travail - Politique publique - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques |2 ram | |
650 | 7 | |a Programmes d'action positive - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques |2 ram | |
650 | 4 | |a Politik | |
650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
650 | 4 | |a Ökonometrisches Modell | |
650 | 4 | |a Affirmative action programs |z United States |x Econometric models | |
650 | 4 | |a Discrimination against people with disabilities |x Law and legislation |z United States |x Econometric models | |
650 | 4 | |a People with disabilities |x Employment |x Government policy |z United States |x Econometric models | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Arbeitsunfähigkeit |0 (DE-588)4002792-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Arbeitsplatzsicherung |0 (DE-588)4068813-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Arbeitsplatzsicherung |0 (DE-588)4068813-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Arbeitsunfähigkeit |0 (DE-588)4002792-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Angrist, Joshua D. |d 1960- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124748430 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
830 | 0 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 6670 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 6670 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w6670.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008315595 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804126889390899200 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Acemoglu, Daron 1967- Angrist, Joshua D. 1960- |
author_GND | (DE-588)124929575 (DE-588)124748430 |
author_facet | Acemoglu, Daron 1967- Angrist, Joshua D. 1960- |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Acemoglu, Daron 1967- |
author_variant | d a da j d a jd jda |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV012269533 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HB1 |
callnumber-raw | HB1 |
callnumber-search | HB1 |
callnumber-sort | HB 11 |
callnumber-subject | HB - Economic Theory and Demography |
classification_rvk | QB 910 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)39932550 (DE-599)BVBBV012269533 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03638nam a2200565 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV012269533</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19981217 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">981118s1998 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)39932550</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV012269533</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">QB 910</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)141231:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Acemoglu, Daron</subfield><subfield code="d">1967-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124929575</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Consequences of employment protection?</subfield><subfield code="b">the case of the Americans with disabilities act</subfield><subfield code="c">Daron Acemoglu ; Joshua Angrist</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="c">1998</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">28 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">6670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to accommodate disabled workers and outlaws discrimination against the disabled in hiring, firing, and pay. Although the ADA was meant to increase employment of the disabled, it also increases costs for employers. The net theoretical impact turns on which provisions of the ADA are most important and how responsive firm entry and exit is to profits. Empirical results using the CPS suggest that the ADA had a negative effect on the employment of disabled men of all working ages and disabled women under age 40. The effects appear to be larger in medium size firms, possibly because small firms were exempt from the ADA. The effects are also larger in states where there have been more ADA-related discrimination charges. Estimates of effects on hiring and firing suggest the ADA reduced hiring of the disabled but did not affect separations. This weighs against a pure firing-costs interpretation of the ADA. Finally, there is little evidence of an impact on the nondisabled, suggesting that the adverse employment consequences of the ADA have been limited to the protected group.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="t">Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Discrimination à l'égard des handicapés - Droit - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Handicapés - Travail - Politique publique - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Programmes d'action positive - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ökonometrisches Modell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Affirmative action programs</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Econometric models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Discrimination against people with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Econometric models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">People with disabilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Employment</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Econometric models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Arbeitsunfähigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002792-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Arbeitsplatzsicherung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4068813-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Arbeitsplatzsicherung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4068813-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Arbeitsunfähigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002792-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Angrist, Joshua D.</subfield><subfield code="d">1960-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124748430</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">6670</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">6670</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w6670.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008315595</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV012269533 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:24:37Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-008315595 |
oclc_num | 39932550 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-521 DE-29 |
owner_facet | DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-521 DE-29 |
physical | 28 S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 1998 |
publishDateSearch | 1998 |
publishDateSort | 1998 |
record_format | marc |
series | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
series2 | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
spelling | Acemoglu, Daron 1967- Verfasser (DE-588)124929575 aut Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act Daron Acemoglu ; Joshua Angrist Cambridge, Mass. 1998 28 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 6670 The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) requires employers to accommodate disabled workers and outlaws discrimination against the disabled in hiring, firing, and pay. Although the ADA was meant to increase employment of the disabled, it also increases costs for employers. The net theoretical impact turns on which provisions of the ADA are most important and how responsive firm entry and exit is to profits. Empirical results using the CPS suggest that the ADA had a negative effect on the employment of disabled men of all working ages and disabled women under age 40. The effects appear to be larger in medium size firms, possibly because small firms were exempt from the ADA. The effects are also larger in states where there have been more ADA-related discrimination charges. Estimates of effects on hiring and firing suggest the ADA reduced hiring of the disabled but did not affect separations. This weighs against a pure firing-costs interpretation of the ADA. Finally, there is little evidence of an impact on the nondisabled, suggesting that the adverse employment consequences of the ADA have been limited to the protected group. United States. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Discrimination à l'égard des handicapés - Droit - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Handicapés - Travail - Politique publique - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Programmes d'action positive - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Politik Recht Ökonometrisches Modell Affirmative action programs United States Econometric models Discrimination against people with disabilities Law and legislation United States Econometric models People with disabilities Employment Government policy United States Econometric models Arbeitsunfähigkeit (DE-588)4002792-2 gnd rswk-swf Arbeitsplatzsicherung (DE-588)4068813-6 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Arbeitsplatzsicherung (DE-588)4068813-6 s Arbeitsunfähigkeit (DE-588)4002792-2 s DE-604 Angrist, Joshua D. 1960- Verfasser (DE-588)124748430 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 6670 (DE-604)BV002801238 6670 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w6670.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Acemoglu, Daron 1967- Angrist, Joshua D. 1960- Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series United States. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Discrimination à l'égard des handicapés - Droit - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Handicapés - Travail - Politique publique - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Programmes d'action positive - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Politik Recht Ökonometrisches Modell Affirmative action programs United States Econometric models Discrimination against people with disabilities Law and legislation United States Econometric models People with disabilities Employment Government policy United States Econometric models Arbeitsunfähigkeit (DE-588)4002792-2 gnd Arbeitsplatzsicherung (DE-588)4068813-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4002792-2 (DE-588)4068813-6 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act |
title_auth | Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act |
title_exact_search | Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act |
title_full | Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act Daron Acemoglu ; Joshua Angrist |
title_fullStr | Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act Daron Acemoglu ; Joshua Angrist |
title_full_unstemmed | Consequences of employment protection? the case of the Americans with disabilities act Daron Acemoglu ; Joshua Angrist |
title_short | Consequences of employment protection? |
title_sort | consequences of employment protection the case of the americans with disabilities act |
title_sub | the case of the Americans with disabilities act |
topic | United States. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Discrimination à l'égard des handicapés - Droit - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Handicapés - Travail - Politique publique - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Programmes d'action positive - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques ram Politik Recht Ökonometrisches Modell Affirmative action programs United States Econometric models Discrimination against people with disabilities Law and legislation United States Econometric models People with disabilities Employment Government policy United States Econometric models Arbeitsunfähigkeit (DE-588)4002792-2 gnd Arbeitsplatzsicherung (DE-588)4068813-6 gnd |
topic_facet | United States. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Discrimination à l'égard des handicapés - Droit - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques Handicapés - Travail - Politique publique - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques Programmes d'action positive - États-Unis - Modèles économétriques Politik Recht Ökonometrisches Modell Affirmative action programs United States Econometric models Discrimination against people with disabilities Law and legislation United States Econometric models People with disabilities Employment Government policy United States Econometric models Arbeitsunfähigkeit Arbeitsplatzsicherung USA |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w6670.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT acemogludaron consequencesofemploymentprotectionthecaseoftheamericanswithdisabilitiesact AT angristjoshuad consequencesofemploymentprotectionthecaseoftheamericanswithdisabilitiesact |