Ethnic conflict: commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis
Forbes takes a critical look at the "contact hypothesis" - the assumption commonly held by social scientists that increased contact between different ethnic groups gives each group more accurate information about the other and thus reduces friction. By distinguishing aggregate from individ...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New Haven [u.a.]
Yale Univ. Press
1997
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Forbes takes a critical look at the "contact hypothesis" - the assumption commonly held by social scientists that increased contact between different ethnic groups gives each group more accurate information about the other and thus reduces friction. By distinguishing aggregate from individual relations, Forbes suggests a way out of the perplexities induced by current social science literature on prejudice and discrimination. Scientific research suggests that increased contact between culturally distinct groups in some cases gives rise to more intense conflict. Yet individuals who get to know each other better generally like each other better. Can these apparently conflicting generalizations both be true? asks Forbes. They are, he argues, and he takes contemporary social science to task for failing to show how and why this is possible. The author clarifies the weaknesses of contact theory, develops an alternative "linguistic model" of ethnic conflict, and concludes with penetrating reflections on the politics and methodology of the social sciences today. |
Beschreibung: | XI, 291 S. graph. Darst. |
ISBN: | 0300068190 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV011727791 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19980225 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 980121s1997 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0300068190 |9 0-300-06819-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)36011666 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011727791 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-12 |a DE-355 | ||
050 | 0 | |a GN496 | |
082 | 0 | |a 303.48/2 |2 21 | |
084 | |a ME 8800 |0 (DE-625)122639: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Forbes, Hugh D. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethnic conflict |b commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis |c H. D. Forbes |
264 | 1 | |a New Haven [u.a.] |b Yale Univ. Press |c 1997 | |
300 | |a XI, 291 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a Forbes takes a critical look at the "contact hypothesis" - the assumption commonly held by social scientists that increased contact between different ethnic groups gives each group more accurate information about the other and thus reduces friction. By distinguishing aggregate from individual relations, Forbes suggests a way out of the perplexities induced by current social science literature on prejudice and discrimination. Scientific research suggests that increased contact between culturally distinct groups in some cases gives rise to more intense conflict. Yet individuals who get to know each other better generally like each other better. Can these apparently conflicting generalizations both be true? asks Forbes. They are, he argues, and he takes contemporary social science to task for failing to show how and why this is possible. The author clarifies the weaknesses of contact theory, develops an alternative "linguistic model" of ethnic conflict, and concludes with penetrating reflections on the politics and methodology of the social sciences today. | |
650 | 7 | |a Etnische conflicten |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Theorie |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Critical theory | |
650 | 4 | |a Culture conflict | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethnic conflict | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethnocentrism | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethnizität |0 (DE-588)4220764-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kulturkonflikt |0 (DE-588)4127656-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Ethnizität |0 (DE-588)4220764-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kulturkonflikt |0 (DE-588)4127656-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007910177 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804126267594768384 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Forbes, Hugh D. |
author_facet | Forbes, Hugh D. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Forbes, Hugh D. |
author_variant | h d f hd hdf |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV011727791 |
callnumber-first | G - Geography, Anthropology, Recreation |
callnumber-label | GN496 |
callnumber-raw | GN496 |
callnumber-search | GN496 |
callnumber-sort | GN 3496 |
callnumber-subject | GN - Anthropology |
classification_rvk | ME 8800 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)36011666 (DE-599)BVBBV011727791 |
dewey-full | 303.48/2 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 303 - Social processes |
dewey-raw | 303.48/2 |
dewey-search | 303.48/2 |
dewey-sort | 3303.48 12 |
dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
discipline | Soziologie Politologie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02413nam a2200445 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011727791</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19980225 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">980121s1997 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0300068190</subfield><subfield code="9">0-300-06819-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)36011666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011727791</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">GN496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">303.48/2</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ME 8800</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122639:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forbes, Hugh D.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethnic conflict</subfield><subfield code="b">commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis</subfield><subfield code="c">H. D. Forbes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New Haven [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Yale Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 291 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Forbes takes a critical look at the "contact hypothesis" - the assumption commonly held by social scientists that increased contact between different ethnic groups gives each group more accurate information about the other and thus reduces friction. By distinguishing aggregate from individual relations, Forbes suggests a way out of the perplexities induced by current social science literature on prejudice and discrimination. Scientific research suggests that increased contact between culturally distinct groups in some cases gives rise to more intense conflict. Yet individuals who get to know each other better generally like each other better. Can these apparently conflicting generalizations both be true? asks Forbes. They are, he argues, and he takes contemporary social science to task for failing to show how and why this is possible. The author clarifies the weaknesses of contact theory, develops an alternative "linguistic model" of ethnic conflict, and concludes with penetrating reflections on the politics and methodology of the social sciences today.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Etnische conflicten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Theorie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Critical theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Culture conflict</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethnic conflict</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethnocentrism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethnizität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4220764-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kulturkonflikt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127656-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethnizität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4220764-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kulturkonflikt</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4127656-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007910177</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV011727791 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:14:44Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0300068190 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007910177 |
oclc_num | 36011666 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-739 DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
owner_facet | DE-739 DE-12 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
physical | XI, 291 S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 1997 |
publishDateSearch | 1997 |
publishDateSort | 1997 |
publisher | Yale Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Forbes, Hugh D. Verfasser aut Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis H. D. Forbes New Haven [u.a.] Yale Univ. Press 1997 XI, 291 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Forbes takes a critical look at the "contact hypothesis" - the assumption commonly held by social scientists that increased contact between different ethnic groups gives each group more accurate information about the other and thus reduces friction. By distinguishing aggregate from individual relations, Forbes suggests a way out of the perplexities induced by current social science literature on prejudice and discrimination. Scientific research suggests that increased contact between culturally distinct groups in some cases gives rise to more intense conflict. Yet individuals who get to know each other better generally like each other better. Can these apparently conflicting generalizations both be true? asks Forbes. They are, he argues, and he takes contemporary social science to task for failing to show how and why this is possible. The author clarifies the weaknesses of contact theory, develops an alternative "linguistic model" of ethnic conflict, and concludes with penetrating reflections on the politics and methodology of the social sciences today. Etnische conflicten gtt Theorie gtt Critical theory Culture conflict Ethnic conflict Ethnocentrism Ethnizität (DE-588)4220764-2 gnd rswk-swf Kulturkonflikt (DE-588)4127656-5 gnd rswk-swf Ethnizität (DE-588)4220764-2 s Kulturkonflikt (DE-588)4127656-5 s DE-604 |
spellingShingle | Forbes, Hugh D. Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis Etnische conflicten gtt Theorie gtt Critical theory Culture conflict Ethnic conflict Ethnocentrism Ethnizität (DE-588)4220764-2 gnd Kulturkonflikt (DE-588)4127656-5 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4220764-2 (DE-588)4127656-5 |
title | Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis |
title_auth | Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis |
title_exact_search | Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis |
title_full | Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis H. D. Forbes |
title_fullStr | Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis H. D. Forbes |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethnic conflict commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis H. D. Forbes |
title_short | Ethnic conflict |
title_sort | ethnic conflict commerce culture and the contact hypothesis |
title_sub | commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis |
topic | Etnische conflicten gtt Theorie gtt Critical theory Culture conflict Ethnic conflict Ethnocentrism Ethnizität (DE-588)4220764-2 gnd Kulturkonflikt (DE-588)4127656-5 gnd |
topic_facet | Etnische conflicten Theorie Critical theory Culture conflict Ethnic conflict Ethnocentrism Ethnizität Kulturkonflikt |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forbeshughd ethnicconflictcommercecultureandthecontacthypothesis |