The word according to James Joyce: reconstructing representation
This book argues for a more conservative view of Joyce's place in the history of critical theory than the view held by scholars. For years interpretation of Joyce's views on language has proceeded on the assumption that an avant-garde writer requires an avant garde theory. It has been sugg...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Lewisburg
Bucknell Univ. Press
1997
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | This book argues for a more conservative view of Joyce's place in the history of critical theory than the view held by scholars. For years interpretation of Joyce's views on language has proceeded on the assumption that an avant-garde writer requires an avant garde theory. It has been suggested that critical theory has just begun to catch up with Joyce, and that we are now able to see Joyce for what he was. In his denial that language refers to anything but itself and in his undoing representation, Joyce anticipates contemporary developments in the history of critical theory. Contrary to modern criticism, Joyce does not abandon representation, the idea that language affords access to reality. This study finds an Aristotelian underpinning for much of Joyce's thinking on language and representation. Language is primarily an aural phenomenon, but knowledge, according to Aristotle, is grounded mainly in vision In Dubliners and A Portrait Joyce tries to make language as efficient a cognitive tool as vision. According to this study, his solution lies in a systematic conception of language, which entails a correspondence theory of representation which provides an explanation of how verbal art, apprehended temporally, can approximate the directness and immediacy of visual art, which is apprehended spatially. Viewed historically, however, language as system has its limitations - a tenuous stability; it does not provide a stable "surface" for reflecting extralinguistic reality. This book argues that this fact does not mean that reality is inaccessible through language, but complicates the task of recovering it. Joyce's response is to redefine the connection between language and the real In his work from Ulysses on, this study argues, he increasingly realizes a resemblance theory of representation, a conception of language as process - one that emphasizes the aural and temporal properties of language. Joyce, however, does not totally reject a systemic conception of language. In Finnegans Wake he attempts a synthesis of the linguistics of time and space. According to this study, the problem of representation for Joyce resolves into that of translating sensory experience into language. His focus on this problem allies him, to a certain extent, with modernist writers like Ezra Pound (ideogrammic method), T. S. Eliot (objective correlative), and Gertrude Stein (continuous present), who profess to be strengthening the connection between word and object. The modernists therefore cannot be seen as precipitating, much less initiating, a retreat from the word |
Beschreibung: | 171 S. |
ISBN: | 0838753302 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV011465540 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19970801 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 970801s1997 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0838753302 |9 0-8387-5330-2 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)34958688 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011465540 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-739 |a DE-703 |a DE-355 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a PR6019.O9 | |
082 | 0 | |a 823/.914 |2 20 | |
084 | |a HM 3135 |0 (DE-625)50971:11852 |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Yee, Cordell D. K. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The word according to James Joyce |b reconstructing representation |c Cordell D. K. Yee |
264 | 1 | |a Lewisburg |b Bucknell Univ. Press |c 1997 | |
300 | |a 171 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a This book argues for a more conservative view of Joyce's place in the history of critical theory than the view held by scholars. For years interpretation of Joyce's views on language has proceeded on the assumption that an avant-garde writer requires an avant garde theory. It has been suggested that critical theory has just begun to catch up with Joyce, and that we are now able to see Joyce for what he was. In his denial that language refers to anything but itself and in his undoing representation, Joyce anticipates contemporary developments in the history of critical theory. Contrary to modern criticism, Joyce does not abandon representation, the idea that language affords access to reality. This study finds an Aristotelian underpinning for much of Joyce's thinking on language and representation. Language is primarily an aural phenomenon, but knowledge, according to Aristotle, is grounded mainly in vision | |
520 | 3 | |a In Dubliners and A Portrait Joyce tries to make language as efficient a cognitive tool as vision. According to this study, his solution lies in a systematic conception of language, which entails a correspondence theory of representation which provides an explanation of how verbal art, apprehended temporally, can approximate the directness and immediacy of visual art, which is apprehended spatially. Viewed historically, however, language as system has its limitations - a tenuous stability; it does not provide a stable "surface" for reflecting extralinguistic reality. This book argues that this fact does not mean that reality is inaccessible through language, but complicates the task of recovering it. Joyce's response is to redefine the connection between language and the real | |
520 | 3 | |a In his work from Ulysses on, this study argues, he increasingly realizes a resemblance theory of representation, a conception of language as process - one that emphasizes the aural and temporal properties of language. Joyce, however, does not totally reject a systemic conception of language. In Finnegans Wake he attempts a synthesis of the linguistics of time and space. According to this study, the problem of representation for Joyce resolves into that of translating sensory experience into language. His focus on this problem allies him, to a certain extent, with modernist writers like Ezra Pound (ideogrammic method), T. S. Eliot (objective correlative), and Gertrude Stein (continuous present), who profess to be strengthening the connection between word and object. The modernists therefore cannot be seen as precipitating, much less initiating, a retreat from the word | |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Joyce, James <1882-1941> - Style |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Joyce, James <1882-1941> |x Knowledge |x Language and languages |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Joyce, James <1882-1941> |x Language |
600 | 1 | 4 | |a Joyce, James <1882-1941> |x Literary style |
600 | 1 | 7 | |a Joyce, James |d 1882-1941 |0 (DE-588)118558501 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 7 | |a Taal |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Sprache | |
650 | 4 | |a Wissen | |
650 | 4 | |a Mimesis in literature | |
650 | 4 | |a Philosophy in literature | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sprache |0 (DE-588)4056449-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mimesis |0 (DE-588)4039392-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wirklichkeit |0 (DE-588)4066380-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Joyce, James |d 1882-1941 |0 (DE-588)118558501 |D p |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Sprache |0 (DE-588)4056449-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Wirklichkeit |0 (DE-588)4066380-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Joyce, James |d 1882-1941 |0 (DE-588)118558501 |D p |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Mimesis |0 (DE-588)4039392-6 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007713099 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804125984266387456 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Yee, Cordell D. K. |
author_facet | Yee, Cordell D. K. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Yee, Cordell D. K. |
author_variant | c d k y cdk cdky |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV011465540 |
callnumber-first | P - Language and Literature |
callnumber-label | PR6019 |
callnumber-raw | PR6019.O9 |
callnumber-search | PR6019.O9 |
callnumber-sort | PR 46019 O9 |
callnumber-subject | PR - English Literature |
classification_rvk | HM 3135 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)34958688 (DE-599)BVBBV011465540 |
dewey-full | 823/.914 |
dewey-hundreds | 800 - Literature (Belles-lettres) and rhetoric |
dewey-ones | 823 - English fiction |
dewey-raw | 823/.914 |
dewey-search | 823/.914 |
dewey-sort | 3823 3914 |
dewey-tens | 820 - English & Old English literatures |
discipline | Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04454nam a2200565 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011465540</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19970801 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">970801s1997 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0838753302</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8387-5330-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)34958688</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011465540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PR6019.O9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">823/.914</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HM 3135</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)50971:11852</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yee, Cordell D. K.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The word according to James Joyce</subfield><subfield code="b">reconstructing representation</subfield><subfield code="c">Cordell D. K. Yee</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Lewisburg</subfield><subfield code="b">Bucknell Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1997</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">171 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book argues for a more conservative view of Joyce's place in the history of critical theory than the view held by scholars. For years interpretation of Joyce's views on language has proceeded on the assumption that an avant-garde writer requires an avant garde theory. It has been suggested that critical theory has just begun to catch up with Joyce, and that we are now able to see Joyce for what he was. In his denial that language refers to anything but itself and in his undoing representation, Joyce anticipates contemporary developments in the history of critical theory. Contrary to modern criticism, Joyce does not abandon representation, the idea that language affords access to reality. This study finds an Aristotelian underpinning for much of Joyce's thinking on language and representation. Language is primarily an aural phenomenon, but knowledge, according to Aristotle, is grounded mainly in vision</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In Dubliners and A Portrait Joyce tries to make language as efficient a cognitive tool as vision. According to this study, his solution lies in a systematic conception of language, which entails a correspondence theory of representation which provides an explanation of how verbal art, apprehended temporally, can approximate the directness and immediacy of visual art, which is apprehended spatially. Viewed historically, however, language as system has its limitations - a tenuous stability; it does not provide a stable "surface" for reflecting extralinguistic reality. This book argues that this fact does not mean that reality is inaccessible through language, but complicates the task of recovering it. Joyce's response is to redefine the connection between language and the real</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In his work from Ulysses on, this study argues, he increasingly realizes a resemblance theory of representation, a conception of language as process - one that emphasizes the aural and temporal properties of language. Joyce, however, does not totally reject a systemic conception of language. In Finnegans Wake he attempts a synthesis of the linguistics of time and space. According to this study, the problem of representation for Joyce resolves into that of translating sensory experience into language. His focus on this problem allies him, to a certain extent, with modernist writers like Ezra Pound (ideogrammic method), T. S. Eliot (objective correlative), and Gertrude Stein (continuous present), who profess to be strengthening the connection between word and object. The modernists therefore cannot be seen as precipitating, much less initiating, a retreat from the word</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Joyce, James <1882-1941> - Style</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Joyce, James <1882-1941></subfield><subfield code="x">Knowledge</subfield><subfield code="x">Language and languages</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Joyce, James <1882-1941></subfield><subfield code="x">Language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Joyce, James <1882-1941></subfield><subfield code="x">Literary style</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Joyce, James</subfield><subfield code="d">1882-1941</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118558501</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Taal</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Wissen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mimesis in literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Philosophy in literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sprache</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056449-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mimesis</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4039392-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wirklichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066380-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Joyce, James</subfield><subfield code="d">1882-1941</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118558501</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sprache</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056449-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Wirklichkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066380-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Joyce, James</subfield><subfield code="d">1882-1941</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118558501</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Mimesis</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4039392-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007713099</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV011465540 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:10:14Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0838753302 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007713099 |
oclc_num | 34958688 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-739 DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-739 DE-703 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-188 |
physical | 171 S. |
publishDate | 1997 |
publishDateSearch | 1997 |
publishDateSort | 1997 |
publisher | Bucknell Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Yee, Cordell D. K. Verfasser aut The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation Cordell D. K. Yee Lewisburg Bucknell Univ. Press 1997 171 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier This book argues for a more conservative view of Joyce's place in the history of critical theory than the view held by scholars. For years interpretation of Joyce's views on language has proceeded on the assumption that an avant-garde writer requires an avant garde theory. It has been suggested that critical theory has just begun to catch up with Joyce, and that we are now able to see Joyce for what he was. In his denial that language refers to anything but itself and in his undoing representation, Joyce anticipates contemporary developments in the history of critical theory. Contrary to modern criticism, Joyce does not abandon representation, the idea that language affords access to reality. This study finds an Aristotelian underpinning for much of Joyce's thinking on language and representation. Language is primarily an aural phenomenon, but knowledge, according to Aristotle, is grounded mainly in vision In Dubliners and A Portrait Joyce tries to make language as efficient a cognitive tool as vision. According to this study, his solution lies in a systematic conception of language, which entails a correspondence theory of representation which provides an explanation of how verbal art, apprehended temporally, can approximate the directness and immediacy of visual art, which is apprehended spatially. Viewed historically, however, language as system has its limitations - a tenuous stability; it does not provide a stable "surface" for reflecting extralinguistic reality. This book argues that this fact does not mean that reality is inaccessible through language, but complicates the task of recovering it. Joyce's response is to redefine the connection between language and the real In his work from Ulysses on, this study argues, he increasingly realizes a resemblance theory of representation, a conception of language as process - one that emphasizes the aural and temporal properties of language. Joyce, however, does not totally reject a systemic conception of language. In Finnegans Wake he attempts a synthesis of the linguistics of time and space. According to this study, the problem of representation for Joyce resolves into that of translating sensory experience into language. His focus on this problem allies him, to a certain extent, with modernist writers like Ezra Pound (ideogrammic method), T. S. Eliot (objective correlative), and Gertrude Stein (continuous present), who profess to be strengthening the connection between word and object. The modernists therefore cannot be seen as precipitating, much less initiating, a retreat from the word Joyce, James <1882-1941> - Style Joyce, James <1882-1941> Knowledge Language and languages Joyce, James <1882-1941> Language Joyce, James <1882-1941> Literary style Joyce, James 1882-1941 (DE-588)118558501 gnd rswk-swf Taal gtt Sprache Wissen Mimesis in literature Philosophy in literature Sprache (DE-588)4056449-6 gnd rswk-swf Mimesis (DE-588)4039392-6 gnd rswk-swf Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 gnd rswk-swf Joyce, James 1882-1941 (DE-588)118558501 p Sprache (DE-588)4056449-6 s Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 s DE-604 Mimesis (DE-588)4039392-6 s |
spellingShingle | Yee, Cordell D. K. The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation Joyce, James <1882-1941> - Style Joyce, James <1882-1941> Knowledge Language and languages Joyce, James <1882-1941> Language Joyce, James <1882-1941> Literary style Joyce, James 1882-1941 (DE-588)118558501 gnd Taal gtt Sprache Wissen Mimesis in literature Philosophy in literature Sprache (DE-588)4056449-6 gnd Mimesis (DE-588)4039392-6 gnd Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)118558501 (DE-588)4056449-6 (DE-588)4039392-6 (DE-588)4066380-2 |
title | The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation |
title_auth | The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation |
title_exact_search | The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation |
title_full | The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation Cordell D. K. Yee |
title_fullStr | The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation Cordell D. K. Yee |
title_full_unstemmed | The word according to James Joyce reconstructing representation Cordell D. K. Yee |
title_short | The word according to James Joyce |
title_sort | the word according to james joyce reconstructing representation |
title_sub | reconstructing representation |
topic | Joyce, James <1882-1941> - Style Joyce, James <1882-1941> Knowledge Language and languages Joyce, James <1882-1941> Language Joyce, James <1882-1941> Literary style Joyce, James 1882-1941 (DE-588)118558501 gnd Taal gtt Sprache Wissen Mimesis in literature Philosophy in literature Sprache (DE-588)4056449-6 gnd Mimesis (DE-588)4039392-6 gnd Wirklichkeit (DE-588)4066380-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Joyce, James <1882-1941> - Style Joyce, James <1882-1941> Knowledge Language and languages Joyce, James <1882-1941> Language Joyce, James <1882-1941> Literary style Joyce, James 1882-1941 Taal Sprache Wissen Mimesis in literature Philosophy in literature Mimesis Wirklichkeit |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeecordelldk thewordaccordingtojamesjoycereconstructingrepresentation |