A composite approach to Air Force planning:
After the 1996 Presidential election, the Department of Defense (DoD) will probably conduct a major review of national military strategy and the current basis of force planning, the Bottom-Up Review. In preparation for this review, what issues should the Air Force consider, what planning methods sho...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Santa Monica, CA
RAND
1996
|
Schriftenreihe: | Project Air Force
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | After the 1996 Presidential election, the Department of Defense (DoD) will probably conduct a major review of national military strategy and the current basis of force planning, the Bottom-Up Review. In preparation for this review, what issues should the Air Force consider, what planning methods should be brought to bear, and when? The authors address these questions and note that there is no single best planning method. Different methods focus on and deal with different generic planning activities, and no method stands alone or constitutes a complete methodology. If undertaken by creative minds, most of the techniques discussed here will do a good job for the Air Force (and for the DoD more generally). But it is particularly important to allow and encourage participants to break the shackles of conventional wisdom--not only about current realities, but about what the nature of the future will be, about what "good" strategic planners are "supposed" to assume about the future, and what types and levels of forces are allegedly "required." |
Beschreibung: | XIX, 50 S. graph. Darst. |
ISBN: | 0833024337 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV011355716 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19970922 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 970527s1996 d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0833024337 |9 0-8330-2433-7 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)35029586 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011355716 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a U153 | |
082 | 0 | |a 358.4/03/0973 |2 20 | |
088 | |a MR 787 AF | ||
100 | 1 | |a Davis, Paul K. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A composite approach to Air Force planning |c Paul K. Davis, Zalmay M. Khalilzad |
264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, CA |b RAND |c 1996 | |
300 | |a XIX, 50 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Project Air Force | |
520 | 3 | |a After the 1996 Presidential election, the Department of Defense (DoD) will probably conduct a major review of national military strategy and the current basis of force planning, the Bottom-Up Review. In preparation for this review, what issues should the Air Force consider, what planning methods should be brought to bear, and when? The authors address these questions and note that there is no single best planning method. Different methods focus on and deal with different generic planning activities, and no method stands alone or constitutes a complete methodology. If undertaken by creative minds, most of the techniques discussed here will do a good job for the Air Force (and for the DoD more generally). But it is particularly important to allow and encourage participants to break the shackles of conventional wisdom--not only about current realities, but about what the nature of the future will be, about what "good" strategic planners are "supposed" to assume about the future, and what types and levels of forces are allegedly "required." | |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States. |b Air Force |x Management |
650 | 4 | |a Military planning |z United States | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Luftwaffe |0 (DE-588)4125963-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Militärische Planung |0 (DE-588)4169951-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Luftwaffe |0 (DE-588)4125963-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Militärische Planung |0 (DE-588)4169951-8 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Khalilzad, Zalmay |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007631341 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804125866140106752 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Davis, Paul K. Khalilzad, Zalmay |
author_facet | Davis, Paul K. Khalilzad, Zalmay |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Davis, Paul K. |
author_variant | p k d pk pkd z k zk |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV011355716 |
callnumber-first | U - Military Science |
callnumber-label | U153 |
callnumber-raw | U153 |
callnumber-search | U153 |
callnumber-sort | U 3153 |
callnumber-subject | U - General Military Science |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)35029586 (DE-599)BVBBV011355716 |
dewey-full | 358.4/03/0973 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 358 - Air & other specialized forces |
dewey-raw | 358.4/03/0973 |
dewey-search | 358.4/03/0973 |
dewey-sort | 3358.4 13 3973 |
dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02449nam a2200445 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011355716</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19970922 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">970527s1996 d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0833024337</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8330-2433-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)35029586</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011355716</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">U153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">358.4/03/0973</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="088" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MR 787 AF</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Davis, Paul K.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A composite approach to Air Force planning</subfield><subfield code="c">Paul K. Davis, Zalmay M. Khalilzad</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA</subfield><subfield code="b">RAND</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIX, 50 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Project Air Force</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">After the 1996 Presidential election, the Department of Defense (DoD) will probably conduct a major review of national military strategy and the current basis of force planning, the Bottom-Up Review. In preparation for this review, what issues should the Air Force consider, what planning methods should be brought to bear, and when? The authors address these questions and note that there is no single best planning method. Different methods focus on and deal with different generic planning activities, and no method stands alone or constitutes a complete methodology. If undertaken by creative minds, most of the techniques discussed here will do a good job for the Air Force (and for the DoD more generally). But it is particularly important to allow and encourage participants to break the shackles of conventional wisdom--not only about current realities, but about what the nature of the future will be, about what "good" strategic planners are "supposed" to assume about the future, and what types and levels of forces are allegedly "required."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Air Force</subfield><subfield code="x">Management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Military planning</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Luftwaffe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125963-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Militärische Planung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4169951-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Luftwaffe</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125963-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Militärische Planung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4169951-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khalilzad, Zalmay</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007631341</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV011355716 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:08:22Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0833024337 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007631341 |
oclc_num | 35029586 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | XIX, 50 S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 1996 |
publishDateSearch | 1996 |
publishDateSort | 1996 |
publisher | RAND |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Project Air Force |
spelling | Davis, Paul K. Verfasser aut A composite approach to Air Force planning Paul K. Davis, Zalmay M. Khalilzad Santa Monica, CA RAND 1996 XIX, 50 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Project Air Force After the 1996 Presidential election, the Department of Defense (DoD) will probably conduct a major review of national military strategy and the current basis of force planning, the Bottom-Up Review. In preparation for this review, what issues should the Air Force consider, what planning methods should be brought to bear, and when? The authors address these questions and note that there is no single best planning method. Different methods focus on and deal with different generic planning activities, and no method stands alone or constitutes a complete methodology. If undertaken by creative minds, most of the techniques discussed here will do a good job for the Air Force (and for the DoD more generally). But it is particularly important to allow and encourage participants to break the shackles of conventional wisdom--not only about current realities, but about what the nature of the future will be, about what "good" strategic planners are "supposed" to assume about the future, and what types and levels of forces are allegedly "required." United States. Air Force Management Military planning United States Luftwaffe (DE-588)4125963-4 gnd rswk-swf Militärische Planung (DE-588)4169951-8 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Luftwaffe (DE-588)4125963-4 s Militärische Planung (DE-588)4169951-8 s DE-604 Khalilzad, Zalmay Verfasser aut |
spellingShingle | Davis, Paul K. Khalilzad, Zalmay A composite approach to Air Force planning United States. Air Force Management Military planning United States Luftwaffe (DE-588)4125963-4 gnd Militärische Planung (DE-588)4169951-8 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4125963-4 (DE-588)4169951-8 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | A composite approach to Air Force planning |
title_auth | A composite approach to Air Force planning |
title_exact_search | A composite approach to Air Force planning |
title_full | A composite approach to Air Force planning Paul K. Davis, Zalmay M. Khalilzad |
title_fullStr | A composite approach to Air Force planning Paul K. Davis, Zalmay M. Khalilzad |
title_full_unstemmed | A composite approach to Air Force planning Paul K. Davis, Zalmay M. Khalilzad |
title_short | A composite approach to Air Force planning |
title_sort | a composite approach to air force planning |
topic | United States. Air Force Management Military planning United States Luftwaffe (DE-588)4125963-4 gnd Militärische Planung (DE-588)4169951-8 gnd |
topic_facet | United States. Air Force Management Military planning United States Luftwaffe Militärische Planung USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davispaulk acompositeapproachtoairforceplanning AT khalilzadzalmay acompositeapproachtoairforceplanning |