Rethinking abortion: equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics
Mark Graber looks at the history of abortion law in action to argue that the only defensible, constitutional approach to the issue is to afford all women equal choice - abortion should remain legal or bans should be strictly enforced. Steering away from metaphysical critiques of privacy, Graber comp...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton, NJ
Princeton Univ. Press
1996
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Mark Graber looks at the history of abortion law in action to argue that the only defensible, constitutional approach to the issue is to afford all women equal choice - abortion should remain legal or bans should be strictly enforced. Steering away from metaphysical critiques of privacy, Graber compares the philosophical, constitutional, and democratic merits of the two systems of abortion regulation witnessed in the twentieth-century: pre-Roe v. Wade statutory prohibitions on abortion and Roe's ban on significant state interference with the market for safe abortion services. He demonstrates that before Roe, pro-life measures were selectively and erratically administered, thereby subverting our constitutional commitment to equal justice. Claiming that these measures would be similarly administered if reinstated, the author seeks to increase support for keeping abortion legal, even among those who have reservations about its morality Abortion should remain legal, Graber argues, because statutory bans on abortion have a history of being enforced in ways that intentionally discriminate against poor persons and persons of color. In the years before Roe, the same law enforcement officials who routinely ignored and sometimes assisted those physicians seeking to terminate pregnancies for their private patients too often prevented competent abortionists from offering the same services to the general public. This double standard violated the fundamental human and constitutional right of equal justice under law, a right that has powerful roots in the American political tradition and that remains a major concern of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment |
| Beschreibung: | 244 S. |
| ISBN: | 0691011427 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV011098183 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 961204s1996 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0691011427 |9 0-691-01142-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)33164306 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011098183 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-188 |a DE-19 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a HQ767.5.U5 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 363.4/6/0973 |2 20 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Graber, Mark A. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking abortion |b equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics |c Mark A. Graber |
| 264 | 1 | |a Princeton, NJ |b Princeton Univ. Press |c 1996 | |
| 300 | |a 244 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Mark Graber looks at the history of abortion law in action to argue that the only defensible, constitutional approach to the issue is to afford all women equal choice - abortion should remain legal or bans should be strictly enforced. Steering away from metaphysical critiques of privacy, Graber compares the philosophical, constitutional, and democratic merits of the two systems of abortion regulation witnessed in the twentieth-century: pre-Roe v. Wade statutory prohibitions on abortion and Roe's ban on significant state interference with the market for safe abortion services. He demonstrates that before Roe, pro-life measures were selectively and erratically administered, thereby subverting our constitutional commitment to equal justice. Claiming that these measures would be similarly administered if reinstated, the author seeks to increase support for keeping abortion legal, even among those who have reservations about its morality | |
| 520 | |a Abortion should remain legal, Graber argues, because statutory bans on abortion have a history of being enforced in ways that intentionally discriminate against poor persons and persons of color. In the years before Roe, the same law enforcement officials who routinely ignored and sometimes assisted those physicians seeking to terminate pregnancies for their private patients too often prevented competent abortionists from offering the same services to the general public. This double standard violated the fundamental human and constitutional right of equal justice under law, a right that has powerful roots in the American political tradition and that remains a major concern of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Abortus provocatus |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Avortement - Aspect politique - États-Unis |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Avortement - Politique publique - États-Unis |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Gelijke behandeling |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Gezinspolitiek |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Politik | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion |x Government policy |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion |x Moral and ethical aspects |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Abortion |x Political aspects |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schwangerschaftsabbruch |0 (DE-588)4053732-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schwangerschaftsabbruch |0 (DE-588)4053732-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007434956 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804125588259078144 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Graber, Mark A. |
| author_facet | Graber, Mark A. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Graber, Mark A. |
| author_variant | m a g ma mag |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV011098183 |
| callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
| callnumber-label | HQ767 |
| callnumber-raw | HQ767.5.U5 |
| callnumber-search | HQ767.5.U5 |
| callnumber-sort | HQ 3767.5 U5 |
| callnumber-subject | HQ - Family, Marriage, Women |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)33164306 (DE-599)BVBBV011098183 |
| dewey-full | 363.4/6/0973 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 363 - Other social problems and services |
| dewey-raw | 363.4/6/0973 |
| dewey-search | 363.4/6/0973 |
| dewey-sort | 3363.4 16 3973 |
| dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03391nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011098183</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">961204s1996 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0691011427</subfield><subfield code="9">0-691-01142-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)33164306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011098183</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HQ767.5.U5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">363.4/6/0973</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Graber, Mark A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rethinking abortion</subfield><subfield code="b">equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark A. Graber</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton, NJ</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">244 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mark Graber looks at the history of abortion law in action to argue that the only defensible, constitutional approach to the issue is to afford all women equal choice - abortion should remain legal or bans should be strictly enforced. Steering away from metaphysical critiques of privacy, Graber compares the philosophical, constitutional, and democratic merits of the two systems of abortion regulation witnessed in the twentieth-century: pre-Roe v. Wade statutory prohibitions on abortion and Roe's ban on significant state interference with the market for safe abortion services. He demonstrates that before Roe, pro-life measures were selectively and erratically administered, thereby subverting our constitutional commitment to equal justice. Claiming that these measures would be similarly administered if reinstated, the author seeks to increase support for keeping abortion legal, even among those who have reservations about its morality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abortion should remain legal, Graber argues, because statutory bans on abortion have a history of being enforced in ways that intentionally discriminate against poor persons and persons of color. In the years before Roe, the same law enforcement officials who routinely ignored and sometimes assisted those physicians seeking to terminate pregnancies for their private patients too often prevented competent abortionists from offering the same services to the general public. This double standard violated the fundamental human and constitutional right of equal justice under law, a right that has powerful roots in the American political tradition and that remains a major concern of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abortus provocatus</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Avortement - Aspect politique - États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Avortement - Politique publique - États-Unis</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gelijke behandeling</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gezinspolitiek</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abortion</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abortion</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Abortion</subfield><subfield code="x">Political aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schwangerschaftsabbruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4053732-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schwangerschaftsabbruch</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4053732-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007434956</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV011098183 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:03:57Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0691011427 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007434956 |
| oclc_num | 33164306 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-188 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 244 S. |
| publishDate | 1996 |
| publishDateSearch | 1996 |
| publishDateSort | 1996 |
| publisher | Princeton Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Graber, Mark A. Verfasser aut Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics Mark A. Graber Princeton, NJ Princeton Univ. Press 1996 244 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Mark Graber looks at the history of abortion law in action to argue that the only defensible, constitutional approach to the issue is to afford all women equal choice - abortion should remain legal or bans should be strictly enforced. Steering away from metaphysical critiques of privacy, Graber compares the philosophical, constitutional, and democratic merits of the two systems of abortion regulation witnessed in the twentieth-century: pre-Roe v. Wade statutory prohibitions on abortion and Roe's ban on significant state interference with the market for safe abortion services. He demonstrates that before Roe, pro-life measures were selectively and erratically administered, thereby subverting our constitutional commitment to equal justice. Claiming that these measures would be similarly administered if reinstated, the author seeks to increase support for keeping abortion legal, even among those who have reservations about its morality Abortion should remain legal, Graber argues, because statutory bans on abortion have a history of being enforced in ways that intentionally discriminate against poor persons and persons of color. In the years before Roe, the same law enforcement officials who routinely ignored and sometimes assisted those physicians seeking to terminate pregnancies for their private patients too often prevented competent abortionists from offering the same services to the general public. This double standard violated the fundamental human and constitutional right of equal justice under law, a right that has powerful roots in the American political tradition and that remains a major concern of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Abortus provocatus gtt Avortement - Aspect politique - États-Unis ram Avortement - Politique publique - États-Unis ram Gelijke behandeling gtt Gezinspolitiek gtt Ethik Politik Abortion Government policy United States Abortion Moral and ethical aspects United States Abortion Political aspects United States Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd rswk-swf Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 s Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 s DE-604 |
| spellingShingle | Graber, Mark A. Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics Abortus provocatus gtt Avortement - Aspect politique - États-Unis ram Avortement - Politique publique - États-Unis ram Gelijke behandeling gtt Gezinspolitiek gtt Ethik Politik Abortion Government policy United States Abortion Moral and ethical aspects United States Abortion Political aspects United States Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4048737-4 (DE-588)4053732-8 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics |
| title_auth | Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics |
| title_exact_search | Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics |
| title_full | Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics Mark A. Graber |
| title_fullStr | Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics Mark A. Graber |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rethinking abortion equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics Mark A. Graber |
| title_short | Rethinking abortion |
| title_sort | rethinking abortion equal choice the constitution and reproductive politics |
| title_sub | equal choice, the Constitution, and reproductive politics |
| topic | Abortus provocatus gtt Avortement - Aspect politique - États-Unis ram Avortement - Politique publique - États-Unis ram Gelijke behandeling gtt Gezinspolitiek gtt Ethik Politik Abortion Government policy United States Abortion Moral and ethical aspects United States Abortion Political aspects United States Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Schwangerschaftsabbruch (DE-588)4053732-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Abortus provocatus Avortement - Aspect politique - États-Unis Avortement - Politique publique - États-Unis Gelijke behandeling Gezinspolitiek Ethik Politik Abortion Government policy United States Abortion Moral and ethical aspects United States Abortion Political aspects United States Recht Schwangerschaftsabbruch USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT grabermarka rethinkingabortionequalchoicetheconstitutionandreproductivepolitics |