Classical quantum theory:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Blumberg
Wesley
1996
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | Literaturverz. S. 323 - 337 |
Beschreibung: | XXI, 345 S. graph. Darst. |
ISBN: | 3980094251 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV011082039 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19970411 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 961118s1996 gw d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
016 | 7 | |a 948572876 |2 DE-101 | |
020 | |a 3980094251 |9 3-9800942-5-1 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)35751206 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011082039 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a gw |c DE | ||
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-703 |a DE-634 | ||
050 | 0 | |a QC174.1 | |
084 | |a UK 1000 |0 (DE-625)145785: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Wesley, James Paul |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Classical quantum theory |c by James Paul Wesley |
264 | 1 | |a Blumberg |b Wesley |c 1996 | |
300 | |a XXI, 345 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Literaturverz. S. 323 - 337 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Quantentheorie | |
650 | 4 | |a Quantum theory | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Quantentheorie |0 (DE-588)4047992-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kritik |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kopenhagener Deutung |0 (DE-588)4359664-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kopenhagener Deutung |0 (DE-588)4359664-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kritik |0 (DE-588)4033229-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Quantentheorie |0 (DE-588)4047992-4 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m HEBIS Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007424638&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007424638 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804125573658705920 |
---|---|
adam_text | CLASSICAL QUANTUM THEORY
by
JAMES PAUL WESLEY, Ph D
2: ^
Technic - - «isJt
i i • -; -r
C Ut
Benjamin Wesley - Publisher
Weiherdammstrasse 24
78176 Blumberg, Germany
CONTENTS
x i
PREFACE vü
INTRODUCTION ix
1 THE FUNDAMENTALS 1
1 1 Historical Background 1
1 2 Classical Waves 2
1 3 The Wave Equation 4
1 4 Standing Wave Solutions 4
1 5 The Superposition Principle 6
1 6 The Superposition Paradox 6
1 7 Poynting Vector and Energy Density 7
1 8 The Wesley Wave 9
1 9 The Three Velocities Involved 10
1 10 Quantum Particle Motion Along Trajectories 11
1 11 Observables 12
1 12 Classical Wave Theory as Hydrodynamics 13
1 13- Time-Average Trajectories 17
1 14 The Phase of an Individual Quantum Particle 19
1 15 Time-Average Trajectories and Causality 20
1 16 Photons in a Medium 22
1 17 Derivation of the Schroedinger Equation 26
1 18 Bound Quantum Particle Motion 27
1 19 The Quantum Potential 29
2 THE ROLE OF STANDING WAVES 32
2 1 Travelling Waves or Standing Waves? 33
2 2 Reflection from a Perfect Mirror 35
2 3 Reflection from an Imperfect Mirror 38
2 4 Retarded and Advanced Solutions to the Wave Equation 39
xii
2 5 Propagation in a Wave Guide 42
2 6 Colliding Coherent Light Beams 45
2 7 Particle in a One Dimensional Box 46
2 8 Statistical Weight of Standing Wave Modes 48
2 9 Distribution of Particles Among Modes 50
2 10 Planck’s Black Body Radiation Formula 51
2 11 Coherence Produced in Standing Waves 53
2 12 Standing Waves Coupling Excited Atoms 55
2 13 Standing Waves and Spectral Intensities 56
2 14 Standing Waves and Bound Atomic Systems 57
2 15 Photons as Permanent Bound Particles 57
2 15a Permanent bound photons in cavity radiation 58
2 15b Permanent bound photons as heat 58
2 15c Permanent photons in the H-atom? 59
2 15d A permanent photon model of the electron 59
2 15e Fixed time delay of photons propagating in a medium 60
2 15f Photonic band gaps 60
2 16 Standing Waves and Optical Phase Conjugation 60
2 17 Standing Waves and Low Intensity Interference 60
3 WAVE BEHAVIOR A MULTIPARTICLE EFFECT 62
31A Quantum Particle is Much Smaller than Its de Broglie
Wavelength 62
3 1a The size of a photon is much smaller than its wavelength 63
3 1b An electron is smaller than its ordinary de Broglie
wavelength 64
3 1c A neutron is smaller than its ordinary de Broglie
wavelength 64
3 2 Interference Between Beams of Quantum Particles 65
3 2a A wave is empirically defined as a multiple particle
phenomenon 65
3 2b Energy flux and interference 66
3 2c A single quantum particle cannot be coherent 66
3 2d Lateral separation of two quantum particle beams that
interfere
3 2e Longitudinal separation of two quantum particle beams
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
Xlll
that interfere 67
3 2f Distance between pinholes and the size of the pinholes 68
3 2g A single particle cannot be multiply disconnected 68
3 2h Wide angle interference 68
3 21 Wave theory and hydrodynamics 69
3 2j Time of separation of two coherent light beams 69
3 2k Interference of light from two independent lasers 69
3 21 Interference between independent microwave sources 71
3 2m Different photons passing through slits separated in
time can interfere 71
3 2n Different electrons interfere with each other 71
3 2o Different neutrons interfere with each other 72
3 3 Quantization a Multiple Photon Effect 73
3 3a Light coherence and atomic systems 73
3 3b Conservation of angular momentum in atomic systems 74
3 3c Line intensities and atomic systems 74
4 LOW INTENSITY INTERFERENCE 75
4 1 Conclusions from Low Intensity Interference 75
4 2 Historical Origin of the Single Particle Wave 76
4 3 Inadequacies of Low Intensity Interference Experiments 78
4 3a Claims of 100% detection efficiency 79
4 3b The threshold intensity for interference is not
determined 79
4 3c Threshold for photographic detection 80
4 3d Visual recognition of interference 82
4 3e Efficiency and threshold for photoelectric detection 82
4 4 Possible Multiple Particle Explanation for Low Intensity
Interference 86
4 4a False claims of observing low intensity interference 86
4 4b High intensity bursts 87
4 4c Field imprinted on interferometer boundaries 89
4 4d Quantum particles trapped in interferometer in
lateral standing-wave modes 90
4 5 Conditions for Adequate Low Intensity Interference
Experiments 90
4 6 Ways to Obtain Low Intensities 91
xi v
4 7 Reduction of Coherence to Obtain Independent Quantum
Particles 93
4 8 Interference to Obtain Low Intensities 96
4 9 Interference Patterns Are Not a Probabilistic Buildup
of Single Particle Interference 98
4 10 Early Low Intensity Interference Experiments 100
4 11 The Janossy-Näray Experiment 103
4 12 False Demonstration that Coherent Light Consists of
Unrelated Photons 106
4 13 Two Laser Low Intensity Interference 108
4 14 The Dontsov-Baz Experiment 109
4 15 The Experiment of Reynolds, Spartalian, and Scarl 114
4 16 The Panarella Experiments 116
4 16a Diffraction observed photographically 117
4 16b Diffraction observed using a scanning
photomultiplier in the current mode 120
4 16c Diffraction observed with a scanning
photomultiplier in the counting mode 122
4 17 Low Intensity Neutron Interference 124
5 EPR, BELL S INEQUALITY, AND FRAUD 129
5 1 The EPR Paper 129
5 1a EPR accept without question most of the traditional
theory 129
5 1b The reality of an element of a system 130
5 1c The failure of completeness 131
5 2 Functional Dependence of p on q 131
5 3 There Is No Need for Hidden Variables 132
5 4 The Traditional Bohr Objection to EPR 133
5 5 Uncertainty Principle and Measurement 134
5 6 Intrinsic Uncertainties Chosen to Satisfy the
Uncertainty Principle 136
5 7 Thought Experiments to Prove Uncertainty Principle 137
5 8 Expectation Values Imply Nonlocality 138
5 9 Bell s Inequality 139
5 10 Improper Evidence for Nonphysical Cause and Effect 141
CONTENTS
5 11 Gamma Rays and Protons to Test Bell s Inequaltiy 142
5 12 The Unfounded Claims of Aspect et Al 142
5 12a The classical theory for the experiment of Aspect
et al (Wesley 1994) 143
5 12b The subtraction of accidentals 145
5 12c Aspect et al could observe no true coincidences 146
5,12d False claims of observing instantaneous widely
separated nonphysical cause and effect 148
5 13 Fraudulent Claims of Single Photon Detection 149
6 FAILURE OF THE UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE 152
6 1 Uncertainty Principle as a Condition for the
Geometrical Optics Approximation 152
6 2 The Variables p and q Are Independent 154
6 3 The Uncertainty Principle is Not an Empirical Principle 155
6 4 The Indeterminacy Principle Is Antiscientific 155
6 5 Dodges in Support of the Uncertainty Principle 156
6 5a The uncertainty principle refers to measurement only 156
6 5b The thought experiment dodge 156
6 5c Both p and q must be measured simultaneously for the
particular system of interest 156
6 5d The uncertainties Ap and Aq are intrinsic 157
6 5e Wave packet values of Ap and Aq 157
6 6 Empirical Failure of the Uncertainty Principle 158
6 6a A photon in a living cell 158
6 6b A photon received by a pocket radio 159
6 6c The electron in the hydrogen atom 160
6 6d A photon in the tip of a scanning light microscope 161
6 6e The electron in beta decay 162
6 6f A photon in Wiener fringes 162
6 7 Implications of the Failure of the Uncertainty Principle 164
6 7a The failure of the single-particle wave packet 164
6 7b The EPR conclusion is confirmed 165
6 7c Classical local causality is confirmed 165
6 7d Bell s inequality is superfluous 165
6 7e Claims of violating Bell s inequality are false 166
6 7f Nonphysical cause and effect has not been demonstrated 166
CONTENTS
xv-i CONTENTS
7 LIGHT RADIATES IN BURSTS 167
7 1 Evidence for Bursts from Low Intensity Interference 168
7 2 Bursts Produce the Brown-Twiss Effect 169
7 3 Natural Line Widths Are Produced by Bursts 170
7 4 Lasing Action Produces Bursts 173
7 5 Bursts Produce Stochastic Phase Changes and Limit Coherence 175
7 6 Bursts to Activate Photographic Grains 176
8 MICHELSON INTERFEROMETER AND A MODIFICATION 177
8 1 Description of the Michelson Interferometer 177
8 2 Fields and Energy before Mirrors M1 and M2 178
8 3 Field and Energy in the Interference Region I 180
8 3a The field in the interference region I 180
8 3b Time-average energy flux in the interference region I 181
8 3c Energy density in the interference region I 181
8 3d Energy density and flux in region I for constructive
interference 182
8 3e Energy density and flux in region I for destructive
interference 183
8 3f Photon trajectories in the interference region I 183
8 4 Reflection and Transmission of Energy Before the
Interferometer 184
8 5 Field and Energy in the Interference Region H 186
8 5a Field in the interference region H 186
8 5b Time-average energy flux in interference region H 186
8 5c Energy density in the interference region H 187
8 5d Energy density and flux for constructive interference 187
8 5e Energy density and flux for destructive interference 188
8 5f Photon trajectories in the interference region IT 188
8 6 Field and Energy Before the Detector 189
87A Modified Michelson Interferometer 189
8 7a Description of the modified Michelson interferometer 189
8 7b The field and energy in the interference region I 191
8 7c The field and energy in the interference region H 193
8 7d The field and energy flux before the detector 195
8 7e Comparison of the modification with the original
Michelson Interferometer 195
9 VELOCITY OF LIGHT IN THE MOVING LABORATORY 197
9 1 The Confusion Concerning the Velocity of Light 197
9 1a The Ritz, or ballistic, theory of light is wrong 198
9 1b The special relativity theory of the velocity of
light is wrong 199
9 2 Classical Theory for Light Velocity 201
9 2a Roemer s observations 201
9 2b Bradley aberration 202
9 2c The Sagnac experiment 202
9 2d Conklin s observation of the 2 7°K cosmic background
anisotropy 203
9 2e Marinov s observations 204
9 2f Francisco Müller s observations 204
9 2g Proposed experiments to further demonstrate the fact
that the velocity of light is c with respect to
absolute space 205
9 3 Classical Doppler Effect 206
9 4 The Voigt-Doppler Effect 209
9 5 Michelson-Morley Experiment 210
9 5a Positive result predicted (but not observed) when
assuming the energy velocity of light 211
9 5b Positive result predicted (but not observed) when
assuming the classical phase velocity 211
9 5c Correct null result predicted by the Voigt-Doppler
effect 213
9 5d Properties of light beam with nonparallel phase
and energy velocities 215
9 5e Pulsed light should yield positive Michelson-Morley
result 216
9 5f Michelson-Morley experiment with the modified
Michelson interferometer 217
9 6 The Value of c, the Velocity of Light 217
9 6a The value of c cannot be arbitrarily chosen 218
9 6b The natural scientific Gaussian system is preferable
to the SI system 219
9 6c Time-of-flight out-and-back measurement of the
velocity of light 220
CONTENTS xvii
x viii CONTENTS
9 6d Cavity measurement of the velocity of light 222
9 7 Photon Velocity for a Given Phase Velocity 223
9 7a Photon motion in a resonating cavity 224
9 7b Photons reflected from a moving mirror 224
9 8 Velocity of Light in a Moving Medium (Wesley 1991b) 226
9 8a Fresnel s ether drag 226
9 8b Hoek s experiment for the velocity of light in a
moving medium 227
9 8c Fixed time delay theory for the velocity of light
in a moving medium 228
9 8d Airy s water filled telescope experiment 230
9 8e The fixed time delay as a function of density 231
9 8f Dispersion and the velocity of light in a moving
medium 231
9 8g Light transmitted through a laterally moving slab 232
9 8h Sagnac effect in a medium 233
10 WAVE-PARTICLE PROBLEM 234
10 1 Huygens Contribution 234
10 2 Newton s Contribution 235
10 3 Young s Contribution 239
10 4 Double Pinhole Interference 240
10 5 Superposition Paradox and Double Pinhole Interference 243
10 5a Nothing physical can be transmitted across a nodal
surface 243
10 5b Active causality and energy flow 244
10 5c Passive causality involving no energy transfer 244
10 5d Not all wave properties can be superposed 246
10 6 Fresnel s Contribution 246
10 7 Hamilton s Negative Contribution 247
10 8 Fizeau and Foucault s Contribution 248
10 9 Weber s Contribution 248
10 10 Maxwell and Hertz s Contribution 249
10 11 Poynting s Contribution 250
10 12 Renaissance of the Photon 251
10 13 The Sommerfeld Quantum Theory 252
10 14 de Broglie Matter Waves 253
CONTENTS
10 15 Schroedinger Quantum Mechanics Is Not a Fundamental
Theory 254
10 15a Schroedinger and Hamilton s geometrical optics
approximation 255
10 15b The Schroedinger theory is not a wave theory 256
10 15c Schroedinger s famous time independent equation 258
10 15d The Schroedinger time variation is not justified 260
10 15e Schroedinger s misuse of complex notation involving
i = V-L 261
10 15f Schroedinger s time dependent equation is wrong 263
10 15g Schroedinger s operator approach is not acceptable 264
10 15h Expectation values cannot define observables 267
10 15i Schroedinger s equation for a fast particle is not
acceptable 269
10 15j Schroedinger s particle flux and density are
empirically wrong 270
10 15k Schroedinger s single-particle wave packet does
not exist 273
10 16 The Born Probability Interpretation 276
10 17 Multiple (Not Single) Particle Waves, Flux, and Density 278
10 18 de Broglie-Bohm Causal Quantum Theory Is Merely the
Schroedinger Theory 279
10 19 Further Unacceptable Ideas of Traditional Qauntum Theory 282
11 EMPIRICALLY CORRECT ELECTRODYNAMICS 284
11 1 Failure of the Maxwell Electromagnetic Theory 285
11 2 Success of Weber Electrodynamics for Slow Charges and
Slowly Varying Effects 287
11 3 Equivalence of Slowly Varying Effects, Action-at-a-
Distance and Relativity 290
11 4 Failure of Weber Electrodynamics for Fast Charges and
Rapidly Varying Effects 292
11 5 The Proposed Empirically Correct Electrodynamics 294
11 5a The proposed force for slowly varying effects and slow
charges 2 94
11 5b The maximum relative velocity of 2c is admissible 295
11^5c The proposed force permits the conservation of energy 295
xix
XX CONTENTS
11 5d Preoccupation with Weber type potentials is not
justified 295
11 5e The proposed empirically correct electrodynamics in
terms of fields 296
11 5f Proposed empirically correct electrodynamics for
rapidly varying effects and radiation 298
11 5g Proposed empirically correct electrodynamics and the
Maxwell theory 298
11 5h Proposed electrodynamics for the Kaufmann experiment 299
11 5i Proposed electrodynamics and the Bertozzi experiment 301
11 5j Proposed electrodynamic theory and gravitation 302
11 6 Evidence for Neomechanics 303
11 6a The experiments of Kaufmann and Bucherer and
neomechanics 303
11 6b The Bertozzi experiment and neomechanics 303
11 6c Neomechanics is implied by the Voigt-Doppler effect 304
11 6d Mass equivalence of kinetic energy implies
neomechanics 304
11 6e Cosmic muon-flux anisotropy 304
11 7 The Two Body Problem in Neomechanics 304
11 8 High Velocity Experiments Needed 307
11 9 The Aharonov-Bohm Effect Is Due to Motional Induction 308
11 9a What is the origin of the Aharonov-Bohm effect? 308
11 9b The original questionable grounds for suggesting
Aharonov-Bohm effect 309
11 9c The Lagrangian method is questionable 310
11 9d The force of motional induction from the Weber
potential 312
11 9e The force of motional induction from Faraday s law
of electromagnetic induction 313
11 9f The Hooper-Monstein experiment 314
11 9g Derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm phase difference 316
11 9h The motional induction force is not conservative 317
11 9i The Weber potential, the force, and the phase as
functions of position along the electron path for
the Aharonov-Bohm effect 318
11 9j Some conclusions regarding the Aharonov-Bohm effect 319
CONTENTS x xi
REFERENCES 323
INDEX 339
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Wesley, James Paul |
author_facet | Wesley, James Paul |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Wesley, James Paul |
author_variant | j p w jp jpw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV011082039 |
callnumber-first | Q - Science |
callnumber-label | QC174 |
callnumber-raw | QC174.1 |
callnumber-search | QC174.1 |
callnumber-sort | QC 3174.1 |
callnumber-subject | QC - Physics |
classification_rvk | UK 1000 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)35751206 (DE-599)BVBBV011082039 |
discipline | Physik |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01588nam a2200445 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011082039</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19970411 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">961118s1996 gw d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">948572876</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3980094251</subfield><subfield code="9">3-9800942-5-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)35751206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011082039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">DE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QC174.1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">UK 1000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)145785:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wesley, James Paul</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Classical quantum theory</subfield><subfield code="c">by James Paul Wesley</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Blumberg</subfield><subfield code="b">Wesley</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXI, 345 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverz. S. 323 - 337</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quantentheorie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Quantum theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Quantentheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047992-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033229-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kopenhagener Deutung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4359664-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kopenhagener Deutung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4359664-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kritik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4033229-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Quantentheorie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047992-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HEBIS Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007424638&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007424638</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV011082039 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:03:43Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 3980094251 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007424638 |
oclc_num | 35751206 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-703 DE-634 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-703 DE-634 |
physical | XXI, 345 S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 1996 |
publishDateSearch | 1996 |
publishDateSort | 1996 |
publisher | Wesley |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Wesley, James Paul Verfasser aut Classical quantum theory by James Paul Wesley Blumberg Wesley 1996 XXI, 345 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Literaturverz. S. 323 - 337 Quantentheorie Quantum theory Quantentheorie (DE-588)4047992-4 gnd rswk-swf Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd rswk-swf Kopenhagener Deutung (DE-588)4359664-2 gnd rswk-swf Kopenhagener Deutung (DE-588)4359664-2 s Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 s DE-604 Quantentheorie (DE-588)4047992-4 s HEBIS Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007424638&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Wesley, James Paul Classical quantum theory Quantentheorie Quantum theory Quantentheorie (DE-588)4047992-4 gnd Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd Kopenhagener Deutung (DE-588)4359664-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4047992-4 (DE-588)4033229-9 (DE-588)4359664-2 |
title | Classical quantum theory |
title_auth | Classical quantum theory |
title_exact_search | Classical quantum theory |
title_full | Classical quantum theory by James Paul Wesley |
title_fullStr | Classical quantum theory by James Paul Wesley |
title_full_unstemmed | Classical quantum theory by James Paul Wesley |
title_short | Classical quantum theory |
title_sort | classical quantum theory |
topic | Quantentheorie Quantum theory Quantentheorie (DE-588)4047992-4 gnd Kritik (DE-588)4033229-9 gnd Kopenhagener Deutung (DE-588)4359664-2 gnd |
topic_facet | Quantentheorie Quantum theory Kritik Kopenhagener Deutung |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007424638&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wesleyjamespaul classicalquantumtheory |