Focus points and convergent process operators:
Abstract: "We present a strategy for finding algebraic correctness proofs for communication systems. It is described in the setting of [mu]CRL [11], which is, roughly, ACP [2,3] extended with a formal treatment of the interaction between data and processes. The strategy has already been applied...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Amsterdam
1995
|
Schriftenreihe: | Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS
95,66 |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "We present a strategy for finding algebraic correctness proofs for communication systems. It is described in the setting of [mu]CRL [11], which is, roughly, ACP [2,3] extended with a formal treatment of the interaction between data and processes. The strategy has already been applied successfully in [4] and [10], but was not explicitly identified as such. Moreover, the protocols that were verified in these papers were rather complex, so that the general picture was obscured by the amount of details. In this paper, the proof strategy is materialised in the form of definitions and theorems. These results reduce a large part of protocol verification to a number of trivial facts concerning data parameters occurring in implementation and specification. This greatly simplifies protocol verifications and makes our approach amenable to mechanical assistance; experiments in this direction seem promising. The strategy is illustrated by several small examples and one larger example, the Concurrent Alternating Bit Protocol (CABP). Although simple, this protocol contains a large amount of internal parallelism, so that all relevant issues make their appearance." |
Beschreibung: | 34 S. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV011064889 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 961118s1995 |||| 00||| engod | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)35649300 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011064889 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
100 | 1 | |a Groote, Jan F. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Focus points and convergent process operators |c J. F. Groote ; J. G. Springintveld |
264 | 1 | |a Amsterdam |c 1995 | |
300 | |a 34 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS |v 95,66 | |
520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "We present a strategy for finding algebraic correctness proofs for communication systems. It is described in the setting of [mu]CRL [11], which is, roughly, ACP [2,3] extended with a formal treatment of the interaction between data and processes. The strategy has already been applied successfully in [4] and [10], but was not explicitly identified as such. Moreover, the protocols that were verified in these papers were rather complex, so that the general picture was obscured by the amount of details. In this paper, the proof strategy is materialised in the form of definitions and theorems. These results reduce a large part of protocol verification to a number of trivial facts concerning data parameters occurring in implementation and specification. This greatly simplifies protocol verifications and makes our approach amenable to mechanical assistance; experiments in this direction seem promising. The strategy is illustrated by several small examples and one larger example, the Concurrent Alternating Bit Protocol (CABP). Although simple, this protocol contains a large amount of internal parallelism, so that all relevant issues make their appearance." | |
650 | 4 | |a Computer network protocols | |
650 | 4 | |a Proof theory | |
700 | 1 | |a Springintveld, Jan G. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
810 | 2 | |a Department of Computer Science: Report CS |t Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> |v 95,66 |w (DE-604)BV008928356 |9 95,66 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007410781 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804125554015731712 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Groote, Jan F. Springintveld, Jan G. |
author_facet | Groote, Jan F. Springintveld, Jan G. |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Groote, Jan F. |
author_variant | j f g jf jfg j g s jg jgs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV011064889 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)35649300 (DE-599)BVBBV011064889 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02214nam a2200301 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011064889</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">961118s1995 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)35649300</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011064889</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Groote, Jan F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Focus points and convergent process operators</subfield><subfield code="c">J. F. Groote ; J. G. Springintveld</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="c">1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">34 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS</subfield><subfield code="v">95,66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "We present a strategy for finding algebraic correctness proofs for communication systems. It is described in the setting of [mu]CRL [11], which is, roughly, ACP [2,3] extended with a formal treatment of the interaction between data and processes. The strategy has already been applied successfully in [4] and [10], but was not explicitly identified as such. Moreover, the protocols that were verified in these papers were rather complex, so that the general picture was obscured by the amount of details. In this paper, the proof strategy is materialised in the form of definitions and theorems. These results reduce a large part of protocol verification to a number of trivial facts concerning data parameters occurring in implementation and specification. This greatly simplifies protocol verifications and makes our approach amenable to mechanical assistance; experiments in this direction seem promising. The strategy is illustrated by several small examples and one larger example, the Concurrent Alternating Bit Protocol (CABP). Although simple, this protocol contains a large amount of internal parallelism, so that all relevant issues make their appearance."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computer network protocols</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Proof theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Springintveld, Jan G.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Computer Science: Report CS</subfield><subfield code="t">Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam></subfield><subfield code="v">95,66</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV008928356</subfield><subfield code="9">95,66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007410781</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV011064889 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:03:24Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007410781 |
oclc_num | 35649300 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 34 S. |
publishDate | 1995 |
publishDateSearch | 1995 |
publishDateSort | 1995 |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS |
spelling | Groote, Jan F. Verfasser aut Focus points and convergent process operators J. F. Groote ; J. G. Springintveld Amsterdam 1995 34 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS 95,66 Abstract: "We present a strategy for finding algebraic correctness proofs for communication systems. It is described in the setting of [mu]CRL [11], which is, roughly, ACP [2,3] extended with a formal treatment of the interaction between data and processes. The strategy has already been applied successfully in [4] and [10], but was not explicitly identified as such. Moreover, the protocols that were verified in these papers were rather complex, so that the general picture was obscured by the amount of details. In this paper, the proof strategy is materialised in the form of definitions and theorems. These results reduce a large part of protocol verification to a number of trivial facts concerning data parameters occurring in implementation and specification. This greatly simplifies protocol verifications and makes our approach amenable to mechanical assistance; experiments in this direction seem promising. The strategy is illustrated by several small examples and one larger example, the Concurrent Alternating Bit Protocol (CABP). Although simple, this protocol contains a large amount of internal parallelism, so that all relevant issues make their appearance." Computer network protocols Proof theory Springintveld, Jan G. Verfasser aut Department of Computer Science: Report CS Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> 95,66 (DE-604)BV008928356 95,66 |
spellingShingle | Groote, Jan F. Springintveld, Jan G. Focus points and convergent process operators Computer network protocols Proof theory |
title | Focus points and convergent process operators |
title_auth | Focus points and convergent process operators |
title_exact_search | Focus points and convergent process operators |
title_full | Focus points and convergent process operators J. F. Groote ; J. G. Springintveld |
title_fullStr | Focus points and convergent process operators J. F. Groote ; J. G. Springintveld |
title_full_unstemmed | Focus points and convergent process operators J. F. Groote ; J. G. Springintveld |
title_short | Focus points and convergent process operators |
title_sort | focus points and convergent process operators |
topic | Computer network protocols Proof theory |
topic_facet | Computer network protocols Proof theory |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV008928356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grootejanf focuspointsandconvergentprocessoperators AT springintveldjang focuspointsandconvergentprocessoperators |