The difference between splitting in n and n+1:
Abstract: "It is established that durational and structural aspects of actions can in general not be modeled in interleaving semantics, even when a time-consuming action is represented by a pair of instantaneous events denoting its start and finish. By means of a series of counterexamples it is...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Amsterdam
1995
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS
95,53 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "It is established that durational and structural aspects of actions can in general not be modeled in interleaving semantics, even when a time-consuming action is represented by a pair of instantaneous events denoting its start and finish. By means of a series of counterexamples it is shown that, for any n, it makes a difference whether actions are split in n or in n+1 parts." |
| Beschreibung: | 27 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV011064197 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 19990319 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 961118s1995 |||| 00||| engod | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)34780450 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV011064197 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Glabbeek, Rob van |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The difference between splitting in n and n+1 |c R. J. van Glabbeek ; F. Vaandrager |
| 264 | 1 | |a Amsterdam |c 1995 | |
| 300 | |a 27 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS |v 95,53 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "It is established that durational and structural aspects of actions can in general not be modeled in interleaving semantics, even when a time-consuming action is represented by a pair of instantaneous events denoting its start and finish. By means of a series of counterexamples it is shown that, for any n, it makes a difference whether actions are split in n or in n+1 parts." | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Graph theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Parallel processing (Electronic computers) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Parallel programming (Computer science) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Splitting extrapolation method | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vaandrager, Frits W. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 810 | 2 | |a Department of Computer Science: Report CS |t Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> |v 95,53 |w (DE-604)BV008928356 |9 95,53 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007410179 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804125553109762048 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Glabbeek, Rob van Vaandrager, Frits W. |
| author_facet | Glabbeek, Rob van Vaandrager, Frits W. |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Glabbeek, Rob van |
| author_variant | r v g rv rvg f w v fw fwv |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV011064197 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)34780450 (DE-599)BVBBV011064197 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01551nam a2200325 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV011064197</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19990319 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">961118s1995 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)34780450</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV011064197</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Glabbeek, Rob van</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The difference between splitting in n and n+1</subfield><subfield code="c">R. J. van Glabbeek ; F. Vaandrager</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="c">1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">27 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS</subfield><subfield code="v">95,53</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "It is established that durational and structural aspects of actions can in general not be modeled in interleaving semantics, even when a time-consuming action is represented by a pair of instantaneous events denoting its start and finish. By means of a series of counterexamples it is shown that, for any n, it makes a difference whether actions are split in n or in n+1 parts."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Graph theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parallel processing (Electronic computers)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Parallel programming (Computer science)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Splitting extrapolation method</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vaandrager, Frits W.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Computer Science: Report CS</subfield><subfield code="t">Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam></subfield><subfield code="v">95,53</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV008928356</subfield><subfield code="9">95,53</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007410179</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV011064197 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:03:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007410179 |
| oclc_num | 34780450 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 27 S. |
| publishDate | 1995 |
| publishDateSearch | 1995 |
| publishDateSort | 1995 |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS |
| spelling | Glabbeek, Rob van Verfasser aut The difference between splitting in n and n+1 R. J. van Glabbeek ; F. Vaandrager Amsterdam 1995 27 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS 95,53 Abstract: "It is established that durational and structural aspects of actions can in general not be modeled in interleaving semantics, even when a time-consuming action is represented by a pair of instantaneous events denoting its start and finish. By means of a series of counterexamples it is shown that, for any n, it makes a difference whether actions are split in n or in n+1 parts." Graph theory Parallel processing (Electronic computers) Parallel programming (Computer science) Splitting extrapolation method Vaandrager, Frits W. Verfasser aut Department of Computer Science: Report CS Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> 95,53 (DE-604)BV008928356 95,53 |
| spellingShingle | Glabbeek, Rob van Vaandrager, Frits W. The difference between splitting in n and n+1 Graph theory Parallel processing (Electronic computers) Parallel programming (Computer science) Splitting extrapolation method |
| title | The difference between splitting in n and n+1 |
| title_auth | The difference between splitting in n and n+1 |
| title_exact_search | The difference between splitting in n and n+1 |
| title_full | The difference between splitting in n and n+1 R. J. van Glabbeek ; F. Vaandrager |
| title_fullStr | The difference between splitting in n and n+1 R. J. van Glabbeek ; F. Vaandrager |
| title_full_unstemmed | The difference between splitting in n and n+1 R. J. van Glabbeek ; F. Vaandrager |
| title_short | The difference between splitting in n and n+1 |
| title_sort | the difference between splitting in n and n 1 |
| topic | Graph theory Parallel processing (Electronic computers) Parallel programming (Computer science) Splitting extrapolation method |
| topic_facet | Graph theory Parallel processing (Electronic computers) Parallel programming (Computer science) Splitting extrapolation method |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV008928356 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT glabbeekrobvan thedifferencebetweensplittinginnandn1 AT vaandragerfritsw thedifferencebetweensplittinginnandn1 |