The rhetoric of reason: writing and the attractions of argument
Responding to skeptics within higher education and critics without, James Crosswhite argues powerfully that the core of a college education should be learning to write a reasoned argument. A trained philosopher and director of a university-wide composition program, Crosswhite challenges his readers...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Madison, Wis.
Univ. of Wisconsin Press
1996
|
Schriftenreihe: | Rhetoric of the human science
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Responding to skeptics within higher education and critics without, James Crosswhite argues powerfully that the core of a college education should be learning to write a reasoned argument. A trained philosopher and director of a university-wide composition program, Crosswhite challenges his readers - teachers of writing and communication, philosophers, critical theorists, and educational administrators - to reestablish the traditional role of rhetoric in education. To those who have lost faith in the abilities of people to reach reasoned mutual agreements, and to others who have attacked the right-or-wrong model of formal logic, this book offers the reminder that the rhetorical tradition has always viewed argumentation as a dialogue, a response to changing situations, an exchange of persuading, listening, and understanding. Crosswhite's aim is to give new purpose to writing instruction and to students' writing, to reinvest both with the deep ethical interests of the rhetorical tradition. In laying out the elements of argumentation, for example, he shows that claiming, questioning, and giving reasons are not simple elements of formal logic, but communicative acts with complicated ethical features. Students must learn not only how to construct an argument, but the purposes, responsibilities, and consequences of engaging in one. Crosswhite supports his aims through a rhetorical reconstruction of reason, offering new interpretations of Plato, Aristotle, and of the concepts of reflection and dialogue from early modernity through Hegel to Gadamer. And, in conclusion, he ties these theoretical and historical underpinnings to current problems of higher education, the definition of the liberal arts, and, especially, the teaching of written communication. |
Beschreibung: | XI, 329 S. |
ISBN: | 0299149501 0299149544 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV010869673 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 19961121 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 960725s1996 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 0299149501 |9 0-299-14950-1 | ||
020 | |a 0299149544 |9 0-299-14954-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)33243235 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010869673 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-19 |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a BC177 | |
082 | 0 | |a 168 |2 20 | |
084 | |a CC 2500 |0 (DE-625)17609: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Crosswhite, James |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The rhetoric of reason |b writing and the attractions of argument |c James Crosswhite |
264 | 1 | |a Madison, Wis. |b Univ. of Wisconsin Press |c 1996 | |
300 | |a XI, 329 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Rhetoric of the human science | |
520 | 3 | |a Responding to skeptics within higher education and critics without, James Crosswhite argues powerfully that the core of a college education should be learning to write a reasoned argument. A trained philosopher and director of a university-wide composition program, Crosswhite challenges his readers - teachers of writing and communication, philosophers, critical theorists, and educational administrators - to reestablish the traditional role of rhetoric in education. To those who have lost faith in the abilities of people to reach reasoned mutual agreements, and to others who have attacked the right-or-wrong model of formal logic, this book offers the reminder that the rhetorical tradition has always viewed argumentation as a dialogue, a response to changing situations, an exchange of persuading, listening, and understanding. Crosswhite's aim is to give new purpose to writing instruction and to students' writing, to reinvest both with the deep ethical interests of the rhetorical tradition. In laying out the elements of argumentation, for example, he shows that claiming, questioning, and giving reasons are not simple elements of formal logic, but communicative acts with complicated ethical features. Students must learn not only how to construct an argument, but the purposes, responsibilities, and consequences of engaging in one. Crosswhite supports his aims through a rhetorical reconstruction of reason, offering new interpretations of Plato, Aristotle, and of the concepts of reflection and dialogue from early modernity through Hegel to Gadamer. And, in conclusion, he ties these theoretical and historical underpinnings to current problems of higher education, the definition of the liberal arts, and, especially, the teaching of written communication. | |
650 | 7 | |a Argumentatieleer |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Logic | |
650 | 4 | |a Reasoning | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schriftlicher Ausdruck |0 (DE-588)4136011-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Logik |0 (DE-588)4036202-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rhetorik |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4002899-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4002899-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schriftlicher Ausdruck |0 (DE-588)4136011-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Argumentation |0 (DE-588)4002899-9 |D s |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Rhetorik |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 2 | 0 | |a Rhetorik |0 (DE-588)4076704-8 |D s |
689 | 2 | 1 | |a Logik |0 (DE-588)4036202-4 |D s |
689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007266189 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804125357145587712 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Crosswhite, James |
author_facet | Crosswhite, James |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Crosswhite, James |
author_variant | j c jc |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV010869673 |
callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-label | BC177 |
callnumber-raw | BC177 |
callnumber-search | BC177 |
callnumber-sort | BC 3177 |
callnumber-subject | BC - Logic |
classification_rvk | CC 2500 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)33243235 (DE-599)BVBBV010869673 |
dewey-full | 168 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 168 - Argument and persuasion |
dewey-raw | 168 |
dewey-search | 168 |
dewey-sort | 3168 |
dewey-tens | 160 - Philosophical logic |
discipline | Philosophie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03462nam a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010869673</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19961121 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">960725s1996 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0299149501</subfield><subfield code="9">0-299-14950-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0299149544</subfield><subfield code="9">0-299-14954-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)33243235</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010869673</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BC177</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">168</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 2500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17609:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Crosswhite, James</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The rhetoric of reason</subfield><subfield code="b">writing and the attractions of argument</subfield><subfield code="c">James Crosswhite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Madison, Wis.</subfield><subfield code="b">Univ. of Wisconsin Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 329 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rhetoric of the human science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Responding to skeptics within higher education and critics without, James Crosswhite argues powerfully that the core of a college education should be learning to write a reasoned argument. A trained philosopher and director of a university-wide composition program, Crosswhite challenges his readers - teachers of writing and communication, philosophers, critical theorists, and educational administrators - to reestablish the traditional role of rhetoric in education. To those who have lost faith in the abilities of people to reach reasoned mutual agreements, and to others who have attacked the right-or-wrong model of formal logic, this book offers the reminder that the rhetorical tradition has always viewed argumentation as a dialogue, a response to changing situations, an exchange of persuading, listening, and understanding. Crosswhite's aim is to give new purpose to writing instruction and to students' writing, to reinvest both with the deep ethical interests of the rhetorical tradition. In laying out the elements of argumentation, for example, he shows that claiming, questioning, and giving reasons are not simple elements of formal logic, but communicative acts with complicated ethical features. Students must learn not only how to construct an argument, but the purposes, responsibilities, and consequences of engaging in one. Crosswhite supports his aims through a rhetorical reconstruction of reason, offering new interpretations of Plato, Aristotle, and of the concepts of reflection and dialogue from early modernity through Hegel to Gadamer. And, in conclusion, he ties these theoretical and historical underpinnings to current problems of higher education, the definition of the liberal arts, and, especially, the teaching of written communication.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Argumentatieleer</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Logic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schriftlicher Ausdruck</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136011-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4036202-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rhetorik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076704-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002899-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002899-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schriftlicher Ausdruck</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4136011-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Argumentation</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002899-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rhetorik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076704-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rhetorik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4076704-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Logik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4036202-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007266189</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV010869673 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T18:00:16Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 0299149501 0299149544 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007266189 |
oclc_num | 33243235 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-29 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
physical | XI, 329 S. |
publishDate | 1996 |
publishDateSearch | 1996 |
publishDateSort | 1996 |
publisher | Univ. of Wisconsin Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Rhetoric of the human science |
spelling | Crosswhite, James Verfasser aut The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument James Crosswhite Madison, Wis. Univ. of Wisconsin Press 1996 XI, 329 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Rhetoric of the human science Responding to skeptics within higher education and critics without, James Crosswhite argues powerfully that the core of a college education should be learning to write a reasoned argument. A trained philosopher and director of a university-wide composition program, Crosswhite challenges his readers - teachers of writing and communication, philosophers, critical theorists, and educational administrators - to reestablish the traditional role of rhetoric in education. To those who have lost faith in the abilities of people to reach reasoned mutual agreements, and to others who have attacked the right-or-wrong model of formal logic, this book offers the reminder that the rhetorical tradition has always viewed argumentation as a dialogue, a response to changing situations, an exchange of persuading, listening, and understanding. Crosswhite's aim is to give new purpose to writing instruction and to students' writing, to reinvest both with the deep ethical interests of the rhetorical tradition. In laying out the elements of argumentation, for example, he shows that claiming, questioning, and giving reasons are not simple elements of formal logic, but communicative acts with complicated ethical features. Students must learn not only how to construct an argument, but the purposes, responsibilities, and consequences of engaging in one. Crosswhite supports his aims through a rhetorical reconstruction of reason, offering new interpretations of Plato, Aristotle, and of the concepts of reflection and dialogue from early modernity through Hegel to Gadamer. And, in conclusion, he ties these theoretical and historical underpinnings to current problems of higher education, the definition of the liberal arts, and, especially, the teaching of written communication. Argumentatieleer gtt Logic Reasoning Schriftlicher Ausdruck (DE-588)4136011-4 gnd rswk-swf Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd rswk-swf Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd rswk-swf Argumentation (DE-588)4002899-9 gnd rswk-swf Argumentation (DE-588)4002899-9 s Schriftlicher Ausdruck (DE-588)4136011-4 s DE-604 Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 s Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 s |
spellingShingle | Crosswhite, James The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument Argumentatieleer gtt Logic Reasoning Schriftlicher Ausdruck (DE-588)4136011-4 gnd Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd Argumentation (DE-588)4002899-9 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4136011-4 (DE-588)4036202-4 (DE-588)4076704-8 (DE-588)4002899-9 |
title | The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument |
title_auth | The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument |
title_exact_search | The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument |
title_full | The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument James Crosswhite |
title_fullStr | The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument James Crosswhite |
title_full_unstemmed | The rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument James Crosswhite |
title_short | The rhetoric of reason |
title_sort | the rhetoric of reason writing and the attractions of argument |
title_sub | writing and the attractions of argument |
topic | Argumentatieleer gtt Logic Reasoning Schriftlicher Ausdruck (DE-588)4136011-4 gnd Logik (DE-588)4036202-4 gnd Rhetorik (DE-588)4076704-8 gnd Argumentation (DE-588)4002899-9 gnd |
topic_facet | Argumentatieleer Logic Reasoning Schriftlicher Ausdruck Logik Rhetorik Argumentation |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crosswhitejames therhetoricofreasonwritingandtheattractionsofargument |