NATO strategy in the 1990s: reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind?
Each April the Strategic Studies Institute hosts a conference that addresses key strategic issues facing the Armed Forces and the Nation. This year's theme, "Strategy During the Lean Years: Learning from the Past and the Present," brought together scholars, serving and retired militar...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Carlisle Barracks, Pa.
US Army War College
1995
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Each April the Strategic Studies Institute hosts a conference that addresses key strategic issues facing the Armed Forces and the Nation. This year's theme, "Strategy During the Lean Years: Learning from the Past and the Present," brought together scholars, serving and retired military officers, and civilian defense officials from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom to discuss strategy formulation in times of penury from Tacitus to Force XXI. Dr. William T. Johnsen, Elihu Root Chair of Military Studies at the U.S. Army War College and a former NATO staff officer, examines The Alliance's New Strategic Concept. Released in November 1991, the Strategic Concept represents NATO's response to the dramatically changed security environment in Europe, and the intense desire to reap the resultant "peace dividend." Dr. Johnsen argues that a close reading of the strategy and subsequent implementing initiatives refutes critics who claim that NATO has failed to respond adequately to Europe's new security conditions. The Strategic Concept dramatically expands the scope of the Alliance's security objectives and functions, takes NATO "out of area," and lays the foundation for massive forces cuts, as well as for a fundamental restructuring of Alliance military forces and command structures. In Dr. Johnsen's opinion, however, the Alliance has been less than successful in the practical implementation of its Strategic Concept. These difficulties stem predominately from confusion within the Alliance over NATO's ultimate function: Should it remain a collective defense organization or should it evolve into a collective security body? Dr. Johnsen argues that for the foreseeable future NATO must remain focused on collective defense. |
Beschreibung: | V, 47 S. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV010772137 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 960528s1995 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)32873858 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010772137 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a UA646.3 | |
082 | 0 | |a 355/.031091821 |2 20 | |
100 | 1 | |a Johnsen, William T. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a NATO strategy in the 1990s |b reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? |c William T. Johnsen |
264 | 1 | |a Carlisle Barracks, Pa. |b US Army War College |c 1995 | |
300 | |a V, 47 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a Each April the Strategic Studies Institute hosts a conference that addresses key strategic issues facing the Armed Forces and the Nation. This year's theme, "Strategy During the Lean Years: Learning from the Past and the Present," brought together scholars, serving and retired military officers, and civilian defense officials from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom to discuss strategy formulation in times of penury from Tacitus to Force XXI. Dr. William T. Johnsen, Elihu Root Chair of Military Studies at the U.S. Army War College and a former NATO staff officer, examines The Alliance's New Strategic Concept. Released in November 1991, the Strategic Concept represents NATO's response to the dramatically changed security environment in Europe, and the intense desire to reap the resultant "peace dividend." Dr. Johnsen argues that a close reading of the strategy and subsequent implementing initiatives refutes critics who claim that NATO has failed to respond adequately to Europe's new security conditions. The Strategic Concept dramatically expands the scope of the Alliance's security objectives and functions, takes NATO "out of area," and lays the foundation for massive forces cuts, as well as for a fundamental restructuring of Alliance military forces and command structures. In Dr. Johnsen's opinion, however, the Alliance has been less than successful in the practical implementation of its Strategic Concept. These difficulties stem predominately from confusion within the Alliance over NATO's ultimate function: Should it remain a collective defense organization or should it evolve into a collective security body? Dr. Johnsen argues that for the foreseeable future NATO must remain focused on collective defense. | |
610 | 1 | 4 | |a NATO |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a North Atlantic Treaty Organization |x Armed Forces |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a NATO |0 (DE-588)377-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 4 | |a Military planning | |
650 | 4 | |a National security |z Europe | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
651 | 7 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europa |0 (DE-588)4015701-5 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Sicherheitspolitik |0 (DE-588)4116489-1 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a NATO |0 (DE-588)377-3 |D b |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1805075585152581632 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Johnsen, William T. |
author_facet | Johnsen, William T. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Johnsen, William T. |
author_variant | w t j wt wtj |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV010772137 |
callnumber-first | U - Military Science |
callnumber-label | UA646 |
callnumber-raw | UA646.3 |
callnumber-search | UA646.3 |
callnumber-sort | UA 3646.3 |
callnumber-subject | UA - Armies |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)32873858 (DE-599)BVBBV010772137 |
dewey-full | 355/.031091821 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 355 - Military science |
dewey-raw | 355/.031091821 |
dewey-search | 355/.031091821 |
dewey-sort | 3355 831091821 |
dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010772137</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">960528s1995 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)32873858</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010772137</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">UA646.3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355/.031091821</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Johnsen, William T.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NATO strategy in the 1990s</subfield><subfield code="b">reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind?</subfield><subfield code="c">William T. Johnsen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Carlisle Barracks, Pa.</subfield><subfield code="b">US Army War College</subfield><subfield code="c">1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">V, 47 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Each April the Strategic Studies Institute hosts a conference that addresses key strategic issues facing the Armed Forces and the Nation. This year's theme, "Strategy During the Lean Years: Learning from the Past and the Present," brought together scholars, serving and retired military officers, and civilian defense officials from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom to discuss strategy formulation in times of penury from Tacitus to Force XXI. Dr. William T. Johnsen, Elihu Root Chair of Military Studies at the U.S. Army War College and a former NATO staff officer, examines The Alliance's New Strategic Concept. Released in November 1991, the Strategic Concept represents NATO's response to the dramatically changed security environment in Europe, and the intense desire to reap the resultant "peace dividend." Dr. Johnsen argues that a close reading of the strategy and subsequent implementing initiatives refutes critics who claim that NATO has failed to respond adequately to Europe's new security conditions. The Strategic Concept dramatically expands the scope of the Alliance's security objectives and functions, takes NATO "out of area," and lays the foundation for massive forces cuts, as well as for a fundamental restructuring of Alliance military forces and command structures. In Dr. Johnsen's opinion, however, the Alliance has been less than successful in the practical implementation of its Strategic Concept. These difficulties stem predominately from confusion within the Alliance over NATO's ultimate function: Should it remain a collective defense organization or should it evolve into a collective security body? Dr. Johnsen argues that for the foreseeable future NATO must remain focused on collective defense.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">North Atlantic Treaty Organization</subfield><subfield code="x">Armed Forces</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)377-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Military planning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015701-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015701-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sicherheitspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116489-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)377-3</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Europa Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 gnd |
geographic_facet | Europa |
id | DE-604.BV010772137 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-20T05:43:44Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-007194180 |
oclc_num | 32873858 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | V, 47 S. |
publishDate | 1995 |
publishDateSearch | 1995 |
publishDateSort | 1995 |
publisher | US Army War College |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Johnsen, William T. Verfasser aut NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? William T. Johnsen Carlisle Barracks, Pa. US Army War College 1995 V, 47 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Each April the Strategic Studies Institute hosts a conference that addresses key strategic issues facing the Armed Forces and the Nation. This year's theme, "Strategy During the Lean Years: Learning from the Past and the Present," brought together scholars, serving and retired military officers, and civilian defense officials from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom to discuss strategy formulation in times of penury from Tacitus to Force XXI. Dr. William T. Johnsen, Elihu Root Chair of Military Studies at the U.S. Army War College and a former NATO staff officer, examines The Alliance's New Strategic Concept. Released in November 1991, the Strategic Concept represents NATO's response to the dramatically changed security environment in Europe, and the intense desire to reap the resultant "peace dividend." Dr. Johnsen argues that a close reading of the strategy and subsequent implementing initiatives refutes critics who claim that NATO has failed to respond adequately to Europe's new security conditions. The Strategic Concept dramatically expands the scope of the Alliance's security objectives and functions, takes NATO "out of area," and lays the foundation for massive forces cuts, as well as for a fundamental restructuring of Alliance military forces and command structures. In Dr. Johnsen's opinion, however, the Alliance has been less than successful in the practical implementation of its Strategic Concept. These difficulties stem predominately from confusion within the Alliance over NATO's ultimate function: Should it remain a collective defense organization or should it evolve into a collective security body? Dr. Johnsen argues that for the foreseeable future NATO must remain focused on collective defense. NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd rswk-swf Military planning National security Europe Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd rswk-swf Europa Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 gnd rswk-swf Europa (DE-588)4015701-5 g Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 s NATO (DE-588)377-3 b DE-604 |
spellingShingle | Johnsen, William T. NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd Military planning National security Europe Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)377-3 (DE-588)4116489-1 (DE-588)4015701-5 |
title | NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? |
title_auth | NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? |
title_exact_search | NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? |
title_full | NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? William T. Johnsen |
title_fullStr | NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? William T. Johnsen |
title_full_unstemmed | NATO strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? William T. Johnsen |
title_short | NATO strategy in the 1990s |
title_sort | nato strategy in the 1990s reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind |
title_sub | reaping the peace dividend or the whirlwind? |
topic | NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd Military planning National security Europe Sicherheitspolitik (DE-588)4116489-1 gnd |
topic_facet | NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization Armed Forces Military planning National security Europe Sicherheitspolitik Europa |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsenwilliamt natostrategyinthe1990sreapingthepeacedividendorthewhirlwind |