Comparing robot and animal behaviour:
Abstract: "The simulation of animal behaviour on a mobile robot is a useful undertaking for roboticists wishing to develop robots for non- predictable domains or with more generality of application than is currently possible. It can also be valuable to ethologists, as a means of testing theorie...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Edinburgh
1992
|
| Schriftenreihe: | University <Edinburgh> / Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper
598 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "The simulation of animal behaviour on a mobile robot is a useful undertaking for roboticists wishing to develop robots for non- predictable domains or with more generality of application than is currently possible. It can also be valuable to ethologists, as a means of testing theories of animal behaviour in a modular manner, repeatably, and with identically 'naive' subjects. Not all tasks we would like robots to undertake require high standards of accuracy, repeatability or even reliability. Some require more in the way of adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness Given the disparate nature of these requirements and the variety of ways in which some of these words are used, it is not always obvious what is the answer to questions such as: how can these requirements be met? how can the results be measured? how can the performance of different robots be compared? The first question requires answers which are specific to the individual robot and the preferred style of its designer and user. The second and third questions are better answered in a more general way which does not depend so much on the particular robot, environment or task. We address the second and third questions here. First we briefly mention some of the benifits of trying to get a robot to behave, in some senses, like an animal. Then we outline some of the fundamental capabilities of animals and examine the extent to which these capabilities are available on present-day robots. This provides a mapping between robot and animal capabilities We then present a list of capabilities which we consider are probably essential to general autonomy, and consider how the headings could be met with current technology. This is given as an aid to designers of robots for tasks requiring adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness; and also as a standard against which existing robots can be contrasted and compared. It should be noted that we expect this minimal standard to be revised in the light of advances in robot technology and programming. |
| Beschreibung: | 10 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV010459886 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 951031s1992 |||| 00||| engod | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)32223094 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010459886 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-91G | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hallam, Bridget |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparing robot and animal behaviour |c Bridget Hallam and Gillian Hayes |
| 264 | 1 | |a Edinburgh |c 1992 | |
| 300 | |a 10 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a University <Edinburgh> / Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper |v 598 | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "The simulation of animal behaviour on a mobile robot is a useful undertaking for roboticists wishing to develop robots for non- predictable domains or with more generality of application than is currently possible. It can also be valuable to ethologists, as a means of testing theories of animal behaviour in a modular manner, repeatably, and with identically 'naive' subjects. Not all tasks we would like robots to undertake require high standards of accuracy, repeatability or even reliability. Some require more in the way of adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness | |
| 520 | 3 | |a Given the disparate nature of these requirements and the variety of ways in which some of these words are used, it is not always obvious what is the answer to questions such as: how can these requirements be met? how can the results be measured? how can the performance of different robots be compared? The first question requires answers which are specific to the individual robot and the preferred style of its designer and user. The second and third questions are better answered in a more general way which does not depend so much on the particular robot, environment or task. We address the second and third questions here. First we briefly mention some of the benifits of trying to get a robot to behave, in some senses, like an animal. Then we outline some of the fundamental capabilities of animals and examine the extent to which these capabilities are available on present-day robots. This provides a mapping between robot and animal capabilities | |
| 520 | 3 | |a We then present a list of capabilities which we consider are probably essential to general autonomy, and consider how the headings could be met with current technology. This is given as an aid to designers of robots for tasks requiring adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness; and also as a standard against which existing robots can be contrasted and compared. It should be noted that we expect this minimal standard to be revised in the light of advances in robot technology and programming. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Bionics and artificial intelligence |2 sigle | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Robotics and its application |2 sigle | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Zoology |2 sigle | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mobile robots | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hayes, Gillian |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 810 | 2 | |a Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper |t University <Edinburgh> |v 598 |w (DE-604)BV010450646 |9 598 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006968839 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804124891042021376 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Hallam, Bridget Hayes, Gillian |
| author_facet | Hallam, Bridget Hayes, Gillian |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Hallam, Bridget |
| author_variant | b h bh g h gh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV010459886 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)32223094 (DE-599)BVBBV010459886 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03207nam a2200361 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010459886</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">951031s1992 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)32223094</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010459886</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-91G</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hallam, Bridget</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparing robot and animal behaviour</subfield><subfield code="c">Bridget Hallam and Gillian Hayes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Edinburgh</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">University <Edinburgh> / Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper</subfield><subfield code="v">598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "The simulation of animal behaviour on a mobile robot is a useful undertaking for roboticists wishing to develop robots for non- predictable domains or with more generality of application than is currently possible. It can also be valuable to ethologists, as a means of testing theories of animal behaviour in a modular manner, repeatably, and with identically 'naive' subjects. Not all tasks we would like robots to undertake require high standards of accuracy, repeatability or even reliability. Some require more in the way of adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> Given the disparate nature of these requirements and the variety of ways in which some of these words are used, it is not always obvious what is the answer to questions such as: how can these requirements be met? how can the results be measured? how can the performance of different robots be compared? The first question requires answers which are specific to the individual robot and the preferred style of its designer and user. The second and third questions are better answered in a more general way which does not depend so much on the particular robot, environment or task. We address the second and third questions here. First we briefly mention some of the benifits of trying to get a robot to behave, in some senses, like an animal. Then we outline some of the fundamental capabilities of animals and examine the extent to which these capabilities are available on present-day robots. This provides a mapping between robot and animal capabilities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> We then present a list of capabilities which we consider are probably essential to general autonomy, and consider how the headings could be met with current technology. This is given as an aid to designers of robots for tasks requiring adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness; and also as a standard against which existing robots can be contrasted and compared. It should be noted that we expect this minimal standard to be revised in the light of advances in robot technology and programming.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bionics and artificial intelligence</subfield><subfield code="2">sigle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Robotics and its application</subfield><subfield code="2">sigle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zoology</subfield><subfield code="2">sigle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mobile robots</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hayes, Gillian</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper</subfield><subfield code="t">University <Edinburgh></subfield><subfield code="v">598</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV010450646</subfield><subfield code="9">598</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006968839</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV010459886 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:52:52Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006968839 |
| oclc_num | 32223094 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-91G DE-BY-TUM |
| owner_facet | DE-91G DE-BY-TUM |
| physical | 10 S. |
| publishDate | 1992 |
| publishDateSearch | 1992 |
| publishDateSort | 1992 |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | University <Edinburgh> / Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper |
| spelling | Hallam, Bridget Verfasser aut Comparing robot and animal behaviour Bridget Hallam and Gillian Hayes Edinburgh 1992 10 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier University <Edinburgh> / Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper 598 Abstract: "The simulation of animal behaviour on a mobile robot is a useful undertaking for roboticists wishing to develop robots for non- predictable domains or with more generality of application than is currently possible. It can also be valuable to ethologists, as a means of testing theories of animal behaviour in a modular manner, repeatably, and with identically 'naive' subjects. Not all tasks we would like robots to undertake require high standards of accuracy, repeatability or even reliability. Some require more in the way of adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness Given the disparate nature of these requirements and the variety of ways in which some of these words are used, it is not always obvious what is the answer to questions such as: how can these requirements be met? how can the results be measured? how can the performance of different robots be compared? The first question requires answers which are specific to the individual robot and the preferred style of its designer and user. The second and third questions are better answered in a more general way which does not depend so much on the particular robot, environment or task. We address the second and third questions here. First we briefly mention some of the benifits of trying to get a robot to behave, in some senses, like an animal. Then we outline some of the fundamental capabilities of animals and examine the extent to which these capabilities are available on present-day robots. This provides a mapping between robot and animal capabilities We then present a list of capabilities which we consider are probably essential to general autonomy, and consider how the headings could be met with current technology. This is given as an aid to designers of robots for tasks requiring adaptability, flexibility of approach and robustness; and also as a standard against which existing robots can be contrasted and compared. It should be noted that we expect this minimal standard to be revised in the light of advances in robot technology and programming. Bionics and artificial intelligence sigle Robotics and its application sigle Zoology sigle Mobile robots Hayes, Gillian Verfasser aut Department of Artificial Intelligence: DAI research paper University <Edinburgh> 598 (DE-604)BV010450646 598 |
| spellingShingle | Hallam, Bridget Hayes, Gillian Comparing robot and animal behaviour Bionics and artificial intelligence sigle Robotics and its application sigle Zoology sigle Mobile robots |
| title | Comparing robot and animal behaviour |
| title_auth | Comparing robot and animal behaviour |
| title_exact_search | Comparing robot and animal behaviour |
| title_full | Comparing robot and animal behaviour Bridget Hallam and Gillian Hayes |
| title_fullStr | Comparing robot and animal behaviour Bridget Hallam and Gillian Hayes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparing robot and animal behaviour Bridget Hallam and Gillian Hayes |
| title_short | Comparing robot and animal behaviour |
| title_sort | comparing robot and animal behaviour |
| topic | Bionics and artificial intelligence sigle Robotics and its application sigle Zoology sigle Mobile robots |
| topic_facet | Bionics and artificial intelligence Robotics and its application Zoology Mobile robots |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV010450646 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hallambridget comparingrobotandanimalbehaviour AT hayesgillian comparingrobotandanimalbehaviour |