Deciding together: bioethics and moral consensus
Western society today is less unified by a set of core values than ever before. Undoubtedly, the concept of moral consensus is a difficult one in a liberal, democratic and pluralistic society. But it is imperative to avoid a rigid majoritarianism where sensitive personal values are at stake, as in b...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York [u.a.]
Oxford Univ. Press
1995
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | Western society today is less unified by a set of core values than ever before. Undoubtedly, the concept of moral consensus is a difficult one in a liberal, democratic and pluralistic society. But it is imperative to avoid a rigid majoritarianism where sensitive personal values are at stake, as in bioethics. Bioethics has become an influential part of public and professional discussions of health care. It has helped frame issues of moral values and medicine as part of a more general effort to find consensus about some of the most perplexing questions of our time. But why is it thought that a moral consensus is important or that it deserves respect? How does moral consensus acquire legitimacy in a society that includes diverse value systems? How is moral consensus possible and how do small groups help create or distort consensus processes Written by a medical school professor trained in philosophy, this timely work tackles these questions from philosophical, historical, and social scientific standpoints. It begins by describing the traditional ambivalence about consensus in Western culture as well as the uncertain relationship in modernity between consensus and expertise. After outlining the current bioethical consensus, the book gives philosophical and political analyses of the idea of consensus, then assesses the role of consensus in national ethics commissions and in the ethics committee movement. Moreno constructs an original, naturalistic philosophy of moral consensus, referred to as "bioethical naturalism", and then applies sociology and social psychology to actual consensus processes. The book concludes with an account of bioethics as a consensus-oriented social reform movement This insightful volume will be essential reading for bioethicists, philosophers, physicians, members of ethics committees, and all those concerned with ethical and social issues in health care |
| Beschreibung: | XI, 165 S. graph Darst. |
| ISBN: | 019509218X |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV010345345 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 950818s1995 xxu|||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 019509218X |9 0-19-509218-X | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)30810822 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010345345 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-578 |a DE-19 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a R724.M677 1995 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 174/.2 |2 20 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 174/.2 20 | |
| 084 | |a CC 7250 |0 (DE-625)17675: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a W 50 |2 nlm | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Moreno, Jonathan D. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Deciding together |b bioethics and moral consensus |c Jonathan D. Moreno |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York [u.a.] |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 1995 | |
| 300 | |a XI, 165 S. |b graph Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Western society today is less unified by a set of core values than ever before. Undoubtedly, the concept of moral consensus is a difficult one in a liberal, democratic and pluralistic society. But it is imperative to avoid a rigid majoritarianism where sensitive personal values are at stake, as in bioethics. Bioethics has become an influential part of public and professional discussions of health care. It has helped frame issues of moral values and medicine as part of a more general effort to find consensus about some of the most perplexing questions of our time. But why is it thought that a moral consensus is important or that it deserves respect? How does moral consensus acquire legitimacy in a society that includes diverse value systems? How is moral consensus possible and how do small groups help create or distort consensus processes | |
| 520 | |a Written by a medical school professor trained in philosophy, this timely work tackles these questions from philosophical, historical, and social scientific standpoints. It begins by describing the traditional ambivalence about consensus in Western culture as well as the uncertain relationship in modernity between consensus and expertise. After outlining the current bioethical consensus, the book gives philosophical and political analyses of the idea of consensus, then assesses the role of consensus in national ethics commissions and in the ethics committee movement. Moreno constructs an original, naturalistic philosophy of moral consensus, referred to as "bioethical naturalism", and then applies sociology and social psychology to actual consensus processes. The book concludes with an account of bioethics as a consensus-oriented social reform movement | ||
| 520 | |a This insightful volume will be essential reading for bioethicists, philosophers, physicians, members of ethics committees, and all those concerned with ethical and social issues in health care | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Bio-ethiek |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical ethics committees | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Bioethik |0 (DE-588)4006791-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Bioethik |0 (DE-588)4006791-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006886258&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006886258 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1811004645105991680 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION, XIII 1. THE CHALLENGE OF CONSENSUS FOR BIOETHICS,
3 CONSENSUS, EXPERTISE, AND MORAL AUTHORITY IN THE LIFE SCIENCES, 3 THE
INSTITUTION OF BIOETHICS, 6 THE NEXUS OF AUTONOMY AND CONSENSUS IN
BIOETHICS, 9 CONSENSUS AND BIOETHICS, 11 CONSENSUS AND CONTROVERSY, 12
SCRUTINIZING BIOETHICAL CONSENSUS, 14 2. CONSENSUS IN BIOETHICS:
PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS, 18 A NEW MORAL CONSENSUS, 18 CONSENSUS IN
BIOETHICAL THEORY, 20 THE INFORMED CONSENT CONSENSUS, 22 BEYOND INFORMED
CONSENT, 25 THE RESEARCH ETHICS CONSENSUS, 28 RESEARCH ETHICS AND WOMEN
OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE, 29 MORAL CONSENSUS AND HEALTH CARE POLICY, 31
ETHICS AND COST CONSTRAINTS IN HEALTH CARE POLICY, 32 CONTINUING
CHALLENGES FOR CONSENSUS IN BIOETHICS, 33 ETHICS COMMITTEES AND THE
FUTURE OF THE BIOETHICAL CONSENSUS, 35 3. ANALYZING CONSENSUS, 39 OF
PHILOCTETES AND PROTEUS, 39 PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE CONSENSUS, 41
CONTENTS DESCRIPTIVE AND PRESCRIPTIVE CONSENSUS, 43 CONSENSUS AS PROCESS
AND AS PRODUCT, 44 CONSENSUS AND COMPROMISE, 45 METAPHYSICS AND MORAL
CONSENSUS, 46 LEVELS OF CONSENSUS, 50 AFFIRMING CONSENSUS, 52 4.
LIBERALISM AND THE MORAL AUTHORITY OF CONSENSUS, 5 5 CONSENSUS AND
LIBERALISM, 55 THE IDEA OF AN OVERLAPPING CONSENSUS, 60 EXTENDING MORAL
CONSENSUS, 62 THE PROBLEM OF REPRESENTATION, 66 ETHICS EXPERTS AND
DEMOCRATIC DELIBERATION, 69 5. NATIONAL ETHICS COMMISSIONS, 73 CONSENSUS
PANELS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 73 A BRIEF HISTORY OF GOVERNMENTAL
COMMISSIONS, 75 THE NATIONAL COMMISSION, 75 THE PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION,
78 GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS COMMISSIONS AND POLITICAL PROCESSES, 82 ETHICS
COMMISSIONS AND THE LIMITS OF LIBERALISM, 84 6. HEALTHCARE ETHICS
COMMITTEES, 88 THE HEALTHCARE ETHICS COMMITTEE MOVEMENT, 88 ETHICS
COMMITTEES AS COMMITTEES, 91 TOWARD A HISTORY OF ETHICS COMMITTEES, 93
STERILIZATION COMMITTEES, 94 ABORTION REVIEW COMMITTEES, 95 KIDNEY
DIALYSIS SELECTION COMMITTEES, 96 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS, 97
QUINTAN: APPEARANCE AND REALITY, 98 THE PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION REPORT
AND "BABY DOE," 100 STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR ETHICS COMMITTEES, 101 7.
NATURALIZING MORAL CONSENSUS, 106 BEYOND THE POLITICAL RATIONALE, 106
TOWARD A BIOETHICAL NATURALISM, 107 THE NATURALISTIC ROOTS OF CONSENSUS,
109 THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MORAL CONSENSUS, 111 A NATURALISTIC PHILOSOPHY OF
MORAL CONSENSUS, 113 WITNESSING CONSENSUS PROCESSES IN THE CLINIC, 117
CASE STUDY 1: THE SURGICAL MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY CONFERENCE, 119
CONTENTS CASE STUDY 2: THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT, 121 CASE STUDY 3: THE
GENETICS COUNSELING CLINIC, 122 MORAL CONSENSUS AND NATURAL HABITATS,
123 8. SMALL GROUPS AND SOCIAL PRACTICES, 126 PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS OF
GROUP CONSENSUS, 126 GROUP PROCESS AND GROUP PRODUCT, 129 APPLIED SOCIAL
SCIENCE AND SMALL GROUP DECISION MAKING, 131 GEORG SIMMEL'S SMALL GROUP
THEORY, 132 J. L. MORENO'S SOCIOMETRY, 134 MANAGEMENT THEORY AND
FACILITATED PROCESSES, 138 WITNESSING CONSENSUS, 140 KEEPING BIOETHICS
PURE, 141 9. BIOETHICS AS SOCIAL REFORM, 143 TAKING CONSENSUS SERIOUSLY,
143 BIOETHICS AS SOCIAL REFORM, 144 BIOETHICS, THE MORAL PHILOSOPHY OF
MEDICINE, AND MEDICAL ETHICS, 147 ETHICS CONSULTATION, ISO ETHICS
CONSULTATION AND SOCIAL REFORM, 151 THE DEMANDS OF CONSENSUS FOR
BIOETHICS, 153 THE LIMITS OF CONSENSUS FOR BIOETHICS, 154 THE DANGERS OF
CONSENSUS FOR BIOETHICS, 155 THE VIRTUES OF CONSENSUS, 157 INDEX, 161 XI |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Moreno, Jonathan D. |
| author_facet | Moreno, Jonathan D. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Moreno, Jonathan D. |
| author_variant | j d m jd jdm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV010345345 |
| callnumber-first | R - Medicine |
| callnumber-label | R724 |
| callnumber-raw | R724.M677 1995 |
| callnumber-search | R724.M677 1995 |
| callnumber-sort | R 3724 M677 41995 |
| callnumber-subject | R - General Medicine |
| classification_rvk | CC 7250 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)30810822 (DE-599)BVBBV010345345 |
| dewey-full | 174/.2 174/.220 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 174 - Occupational ethics |
| dewey-raw | 174/.2 174/.2 20 |
| dewey-search | 174/.2 174/.2 20 |
| dewey-sort | 3174 12 |
| dewey-tens | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010345345</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">950818s1995 xxu|||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">019509218X</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-509218-X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)30810822</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010345345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-578</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R724.M677 1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">174/.2</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">174/.2 20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7250</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17675:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">W 50</subfield><subfield code="2">nlm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moreno, Jonathan D.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deciding together</subfield><subfield code="b">bioethics and moral consensus</subfield><subfield code="c">Jonathan D. Moreno</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 165 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Western society today is less unified by a set of core values than ever before. Undoubtedly, the concept of moral consensus is a difficult one in a liberal, democratic and pluralistic society. But it is imperative to avoid a rigid majoritarianism where sensitive personal values are at stake, as in bioethics. Bioethics has become an influential part of public and professional discussions of health care. It has helped frame issues of moral values and medicine as part of a more general effort to find consensus about some of the most perplexing questions of our time. But why is it thought that a moral consensus is important or that it deserves respect? How does moral consensus acquire legitimacy in a society that includes diverse value systems? How is moral consensus possible and how do small groups help create or distort consensus processes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Written by a medical school professor trained in philosophy, this timely work tackles these questions from philosophical, historical, and social scientific standpoints. It begins by describing the traditional ambivalence about consensus in Western culture as well as the uncertain relationship in modernity between consensus and expertise. After outlining the current bioethical consensus, the book gives philosophical and political analyses of the idea of consensus, then assesses the role of consensus in national ethics commissions and in the ethics committee movement. Moreno constructs an original, naturalistic philosophy of moral consensus, referred to as "bioethical naturalism", and then applies sociology and social psychology to actual consensus processes. The book concludes with an account of bioethics as a consensus-oriented social reform movement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This insightful volume will be essential reading for bioethicists, philosophers, physicians, members of ethics committees, and all those concerned with ethical and social issues in health care</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bio-ethiek</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Bioethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical ethics committees</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bioethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4006791-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Bioethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4006791-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006886258&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006886258</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV010345345 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-09-23T16:23:36Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 019509218X |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006886258 |
| oclc_num | 30810822 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-521 DE-578 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-521 DE-578 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | XI, 165 S. graph Darst. |
| publishDate | 1995 |
| publishDateSearch | 1995 |
| publishDateSort | 1995 |
| publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Moreno, Jonathan D. Verfasser aut Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus Jonathan D. Moreno New York [u.a.] Oxford Univ. Press 1995 XI, 165 S. graph Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Western society today is less unified by a set of core values than ever before. Undoubtedly, the concept of moral consensus is a difficult one in a liberal, democratic and pluralistic society. But it is imperative to avoid a rigid majoritarianism where sensitive personal values are at stake, as in bioethics. Bioethics has become an influential part of public and professional discussions of health care. It has helped frame issues of moral values and medicine as part of a more general effort to find consensus about some of the most perplexing questions of our time. But why is it thought that a moral consensus is important or that it deserves respect? How does moral consensus acquire legitimacy in a society that includes diverse value systems? How is moral consensus possible and how do small groups help create or distort consensus processes Written by a medical school professor trained in philosophy, this timely work tackles these questions from philosophical, historical, and social scientific standpoints. It begins by describing the traditional ambivalence about consensus in Western culture as well as the uncertain relationship in modernity between consensus and expertise. After outlining the current bioethical consensus, the book gives philosophical and political analyses of the idea of consensus, then assesses the role of consensus in national ethics commissions and in the ethics committee movement. Moreno constructs an original, naturalistic philosophy of moral consensus, referred to as "bioethical naturalism", and then applies sociology and social psychology to actual consensus processes. The book concludes with an account of bioethics as a consensus-oriented social reform movement This insightful volume will be essential reading for bioethicists, philosophers, physicians, members of ethics committees, and all those concerned with ethical and social issues in health care Bio-ethiek gtt Bioethics Medical ethics committees Bioethik (DE-588)4006791-9 gnd rswk-swf Bioethik (DE-588)4006791-9 s DE-604 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006886258&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Moreno, Jonathan D. Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus Bio-ethiek gtt Bioethics Medical ethics committees Bioethik (DE-588)4006791-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4006791-9 |
| title | Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus |
| title_auth | Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus |
| title_exact_search | Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus |
| title_full | Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus Jonathan D. Moreno |
| title_fullStr | Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus Jonathan D. Moreno |
| title_full_unstemmed | Deciding together bioethics and moral consensus Jonathan D. Moreno |
| title_short | Deciding together |
| title_sort | deciding together bioethics and moral consensus |
| title_sub | bioethics and moral consensus |
| topic | Bio-ethiek gtt Bioethics Medical ethics committees Bioethik (DE-588)4006791-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Bio-ethiek Bioethics Medical ethics committees Bioethik |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006886258&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT morenojonathand decidingtogetherbioethicsandmoralconsensus |