The future of the United Nations: implications for peace operations
President Clinton has expressed clear support for greater U.N. effectiveness in the peaceful resolution of conflict and the organization of collective security. This entails finding ways to improve U.N. peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peace-enforcement. The U.S. Army will have a vital role in this pr...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Carlisle Barracks, Pa.
Strategic Studies Inst., US Army War College
1993
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Special report / Strategic Studies Institute
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | President Clinton has expressed clear support for greater U.N. effectiveness in the peaceful resolution of conflict and the organization of collective security. This entails finding ways to improve U.N. peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peace-enforcement. The U.S. Army will have a vital role in this process and thus must better understand both the U.N. itself and the key issues and questions associated with peace support operations. The foundation of such understanding is debate on a series of broad issues such as the macro-level configuration of the international system, alterations in global values (especially the notion of sovereignty), and the function of the United Nations in possible future international systems. While questions concerning such problems cannot be answered with certainty, they will serve as the basis for future decisions on doctrine, force structure, and strategy. It is thus vital for American security professionals to grapple with them. To encourage this process, the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, sponsored a roundtable on October 5, 1993 that brought together distinguished experts from both inside and outside the government. They included widely-published writers, analysts, and practitioners of peace operations. Their goal was less to reach consensus on the future of the U.N. than to agree on what the vital questions, problems, and issues will be. This report is not a verbatim transcript of discussion at the roundtable, but an attempt to capture the debate and identify the core issues which emerged. |
| Beschreibung: | VII, 40 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV010274770 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 19950704 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 950703s1993 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)29546211 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010274770 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JX1981.P7 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 355.3/57 |2 20 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Metz, Steven |d 1956- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)137098588 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The future of the United Nations |b implications for peace operations |c Steven Metz |
| 264 | 1 | |a Carlisle Barracks, Pa. |b Strategic Studies Inst., US Army War College |c 1993 | |
| 300 | |a VII, 40 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Special report / Strategic Studies Institute | |
| 520 | 3 | |a President Clinton has expressed clear support for greater U.N. effectiveness in the peaceful resolution of conflict and the organization of collective security. This entails finding ways to improve U.N. peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peace-enforcement. The U.S. Army will have a vital role in this process and thus must better understand both the U.N. itself and the key issues and questions associated with peace support operations. The foundation of such understanding is debate on a series of broad issues such as the macro-level configuration of the international system, alterations in global values (especially the notion of sovereignty), and the function of the United Nations in possible future international systems. While questions concerning such problems cannot be answered with certainty, they will serve as the basis for future decisions on doctrine, force structure, and strategy. It is thus vital for American security professionals to grapple with them. To encourage this process, the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, sponsored a roundtable on October 5, 1993 that brought together distinguished experts from both inside and outside the government. They included widely-published writers, analysts, and practitioners of peace operations. Their goal was less to reach consensus on the future of the U.N. than to agree on what the vital questions, problems, and issues will be. This report is not a verbatim transcript of discussion at the roundtable, but an attempt to capture the debate and identify the core issues which emerged. | |
| 610 | 1 | 4 | |a Vereinte Nationen |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United Nations |x Armed Forces |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006835794 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804124690426363904 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Metz, Steven 1956- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)137098588 |
| author_facet | Metz, Steven 1956- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Metz, Steven 1956- |
| author_variant | s m sm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV010274770 |
| callnumber-first | J - Political Science |
| callnumber-label | JX1981 |
| callnumber-raw | JX1981.P7 |
| callnumber-search | JX1981.P7 |
| callnumber-sort | JX 41981 P7 |
| callnumber-subject | JX - International Law |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)29546211 (DE-599)BVBBV010274770 |
| dewey-full | 355.3/57 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 355 - Military science |
| dewey-raw | 355.3/57 |
| dewey-search | 355.3/57 |
| dewey-sort | 3355.3 257 |
| dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
| discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02526nam a2200313 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010274770</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">19950704 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">950703s1993 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)29546211</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010274770</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JX1981.P7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355.3/57</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Metz, Steven</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)137098588</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The future of the United Nations</subfield><subfield code="b">implications for peace operations</subfield><subfield code="c">Steven Metz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Carlisle Barracks, Pa.</subfield><subfield code="b">Strategic Studies Inst., US Army War College</subfield><subfield code="c">1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VII, 40 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Special report / Strategic Studies Institute</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">President Clinton has expressed clear support for greater U.N. effectiveness in the peaceful resolution of conflict and the organization of collective security. This entails finding ways to improve U.N. peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peace-enforcement. The U.S. Army will have a vital role in this process and thus must better understand both the U.N. itself and the key issues and questions associated with peace support operations. The foundation of such understanding is debate on a series of broad issues such as the macro-level configuration of the international system, alterations in global values (especially the notion of sovereignty), and the function of the United Nations in possible future international systems. While questions concerning such problems cannot be answered with certainty, they will serve as the basis for future decisions on doctrine, force structure, and strategy. It is thus vital for American security professionals to grapple with them. To encourage this process, the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, sponsored a roundtable on October 5, 1993 that brought together distinguished experts from both inside and outside the government. They included widely-published writers, analysts, and practitioners of peace operations. Their goal was less to reach consensus on the future of the U.N. than to agree on what the vital questions, problems, and issues will be. This report is not a verbatim transcript of discussion at the roundtable, but an attempt to capture the debate and identify the core issues which emerged.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Vereinte Nationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United Nations</subfield><subfield code="x">Armed Forces</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006835794</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV010274770 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:49:40Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006835794 |
| oclc_num | 29546211 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | VII, 40 S. |
| publishDate | 1993 |
| publishDateSearch | 1993 |
| publishDateSort | 1993 |
| publisher | Strategic Studies Inst., US Army War College |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Special report / Strategic Studies Institute |
| spelling | Metz, Steven 1956- Verfasser (DE-588)137098588 aut The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations Steven Metz Carlisle Barracks, Pa. Strategic Studies Inst., US Army War College 1993 VII, 40 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Special report / Strategic Studies Institute President Clinton has expressed clear support for greater U.N. effectiveness in the peaceful resolution of conflict and the organization of collective security. This entails finding ways to improve U.N. peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peace-enforcement. The U.S. Army will have a vital role in this process and thus must better understand both the U.N. itself and the key issues and questions associated with peace support operations. The foundation of such understanding is debate on a series of broad issues such as the macro-level configuration of the international system, alterations in global values (especially the notion of sovereignty), and the function of the United Nations in possible future international systems. While questions concerning such problems cannot be answered with certainty, they will serve as the basis for future decisions on doctrine, force structure, and strategy. It is thus vital for American security professionals to grapple with them. To encourage this process, the Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, sponsored a roundtable on October 5, 1993 that brought together distinguished experts from both inside and outside the government. They included widely-published writers, analysts, and practitioners of peace operations. Their goal was less to reach consensus on the future of the U.N. than to agree on what the vital questions, problems, and issues will be. This report is not a verbatim transcript of discussion at the roundtable, but an attempt to capture the debate and identify the core issues which emerged. Vereinte Nationen United Nations Armed Forces |
| spellingShingle | Metz, Steven 1956- The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations Vereinte Nationen United Nations Armed Forces |
| title | The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations |
| title_auth | The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations |
| title_exact_search | The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations |
| title_full | The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations Steven Metz |
| title_fullStr | The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations Steven Metz |
| title_full_unstemmed | The future of the United Nations implications for peace operations Steven Metz |
| title_short | The future of the United Nations |
| title_sort | the future of the united nations implications for peace operations |
| title_sub | implications for peace operations |
| topic | Vereinte Nationen United Nations Armed Forces |
| topic_facet | Vereinte Nationen United Nations Armed Forces |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT metzsteven thefutureoftheunitednationsimplicationsforpeaceoperations |