Combinatory reduction systems: introduction and survey

Abstract: "Combinatory Reduction Systems, or CRSs for short, were designed to combine the usual first-order format of term rewriting with the presence of bound variables as in pure [lambda]-calculus and various typed [lambda]-calculi. Bound variables are also present in many other rewrite syste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Klop, Jan Willem 1945- (VerfasserIn), Oostrom, Vincent van (VerfasserIn), Raamsdonk, Femke van (VerfasserIn)
Format: Buch
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Amsterdam 1993
Schriftenreihe:Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS 93,62
Schlagworte:
Zusammenfassung:Abstract: "Combinatory Reduction Systems, or CRSs for short, were designed to combine the usual first-order format of term rewriting with the presence of bound variables as in pure [lambda]-calculus and various typed [lambda]-calculi. Bound variables are also present in many other rewrite systems, such as systems with simplification rules for proof normalization. The original idea of CRSs is due to Aczel, who introduced a restricted class of CRSs and, under the assumption of orthogonality, proved confluence. Orthogonality means that the rules are non-ambiguous (no overlap leading to a critical pair) and left-linear (no global comparison of terms necessary)
We introduce the class of orthogonal CRSs, illustrated with many examples, discuss its expressive power, and give an outline of a short proof of confluence. This proof is a direct generalization of Aczel's original proof, which is close to the well-known confluence proof for [lambda]-calculus by Tait and Martin-Lof. There is a well-known connection between the parallel reduction featuring in the latter proof, and the concept of 'developments', and a classical lemma in the theory of [lambda]-calculus is that of 'Finite Developments', a strong normalization result. It turns out that the notion of 'parallel reduction' used in Aczel's proof gives rise to a generalized form of developments, which we call 'superdevelopments' and on which we will briefly comment. We conclude with mentioning the results of a comparison of CRSs with the recently proposed and strongly related format of higher-order rewriting: Nipkow's HRSs (Higher-order Rewrite Systems).
Beschreibung:26 S.

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand!