Combinatory reduction systems: introduction and survey
Abstract: "Combinatory Reduction Systems, or CRSs for short, were designed to combine the usual first-order format of term rewriting with the presence of bound variables as in pure [lambda]-calculus and various typed [lambda]-calculi. Bound variables are also present in many other rewrite syste...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Amsterdam
1993
|
Schriftenreihe: | Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS
93,62 |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "Combinatory Reduction Systems, or CRSs for short, were designed to combine the usual first-order format of term rewriting with the presence of bound variables as in pure [lambda]-calculus and various typed [lambda]-calculi. Bound variables are also present in many other rewrite systems, such as systems with simplification rules for proof normalization. The original idea of CRSs is due to Aczel, who introduced a restricted class of CRSs and, under the assumption of orthogonality, proved confluence. Orthogonality means that the rules are non-ambiguous (no overlap leading to a critical pair) and left-linear (no global comparison of terms necessary) We introduce the class of orthogonal CRSs, illustrated with many examples, discuss its expressive power, and give an outline of a short proof of confluence. This proof is a direct generalization of Aczel's original proof, which is close to the well-known confluence proof for [lambda]-calculus by Tait and Martin-Lof. There is a well-known connection between the parallel reduction featuring in the latter proof, and the concept of 'developments', and a classical lemma in the theory of [lambda]-calculus is that of 'Finite Developments', a strong normalization result. It turns out that the notion of 'parallel reduction' used in Aczel's proof gives rise to a generalized form of developments, which we call 'superdevelopments' and on which we will briefly comment. We conclude with mentioning the results of a comparison of CRSs with the recently proposed and strongly related format of higher-order rewriting: Nipkow's HRSs (Higher-order Rewrite Systems). |
Beschreibung: | 26 S. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV010176874 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 950510s1993 |||| 00||| engod | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)31129780 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010176874 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
100 | 1 | |a Klop, Jan Willem |d 1945- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)130644498 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Combinatory reduction systems |b introduction and survey |c J. W. Klop ; V. van Oostrom ; F. van Raamsdonk |
264 | 1 | |a Amsterdam |c 1993 | |
300 | |a 26 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS |v 93,62 | |
520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "Combinatory Reduction Systems, or CRSs for short, were designed to combine the usual first-order format of term rewriting with the presence of bound variables as in pure [lambda]-calculus and various typed [lambda]-calculi. Bound variables are also present in many other rewrite systems, such as systems with simplification rules for proof normalization. The original idea of CRSs is due to Aczel, who introduced a restricted class of CRSs and, under the assumption of orthogonality, proved confluence. Orthogonality means that the rules are non-ambiguous (no overlap leading to a critical pair) and left-linear (no global comparison of terms necessary) | |
520 | 3 | |a We introduce the class of orthogonal CRSs, illustrated with many examples, discuss its expressive power, and give an outline of a short proof of confluence. This proof is a direct generalization of Aczel's original proof, which is close to the well-known confluence proof for [lambda]-calculus by Tait and Martin-Lof. There is a well-known connection between the parallel reduction featuring in the latter proof, and the concept of 'developments', and a classical lemma in the theory of [lambda]-calculus is that of 'Finite Developments', a strong normalization result. It turns out that the notion of 'parallel reduction' used in Aczel's proof gives rise to a generalized form of developments, which we call 'superdevelopments' and on which we will briefly comment. We conclude with mentioning the results of a comparison of CRSs with the recently proposed and strongly related format of higher-order rewriting: Nipkow's HRSs (Higher-order Rewrite Systems). | |
650 | 4 | |a Lambda calculus | |
650 | 4 | |a Rewriting systems (Computer science) | |
700 | 1 | |a Oostrom, Vincent van |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Raamsdonk, Femke van |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
810 | 2 | |a Department of Computer Science: Report CS |t Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> |v 93,62 |w (DE-604)BV008928356 |9 93,62 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006759503 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804124574530404352 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Klop, Jan Willem 1945- Oostrom, Vincent van Raamsdonk, Femke van |
author_GND | (DE-588)130644498 |
author_facet | Klop, Jan Willem 1945- Oostrom, Vincent van Raamsdonk, Femke van |
author_role | aut aut aut |
author_sort | Klop, Jan Willem 1945- |
author_variant | j w k jw jwk v v o vv vvo f v r fv fvr |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV010176874 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)31129780 (DE-599)BVBBV010176874 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02790nam a2200325 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010176874</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">950510s1993 |||| 00||| engod</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)31129780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010176874</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Klop, Jan Willem</subfield><subfield code="d">1945-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)130644498</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Combinatory reduction systems</subfield><subfield code="b">introduction and survey</subfield><subfield code="c">J. W. Klop ; V. van Oostrom ; F. van Raamsdonk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="c">1993</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">26 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS</subfield><subfield code="v">93,62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "Combinatory Reduction Systems, or CRSs for short, were designed to combine the usual first-order format of term rewriting with the presence of bound variables as in pure [lambda]-calculus and various typed [lambda]-calculi. Bound variables are also present in many other rewrite systems, such as systems with simplification rules for proof normalization. The original idea of CRSs is due to Aczel, who introduced a restricted class of CRSs and, under the assumption of orthogonality, proved confluence. Orthogonality means that the rules are non-ambiguous (no overlap leading to a critical pair) and left-linear (no global comparison of terms necessary)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We introduce the class of orthogonal CRSs, illustrated with many examples, discuss its expressive power, and give an outline of a short proof of confluence. This proof is a direct generalization of Aczel's original proof, which is close to the well-known confluence proof for [lambda]-calculus by Tait and Martin-Lof. There is a well-known connection between the parallel reduction featuring in the latter proof, and the concept of 'developments', and a classical lemma in the theory of [lambda]-calculus is that of 'Finite Developments', a strong normalization result. It turns out that the notion of 'parallel reduction' used in Aczel's proof gives rise to a generalized form of developments, which we call 'superdevelopments' and on which we will briefly comment. We conclude with mentioning the results of a comparison of CRSs with the recently proposed and strongly related format of higher-order rewriting: Nipkow's HRSs (Higher-order Rewrite Systems).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Lambda calculus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rewriting systems (Computer science)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oostrom, Vincent van</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Raamsdonk, Femke van</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Department of Computer Science: Report CS</subfield><subfield code="t">Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam></subfield><subfield code="v">93,62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV008928356</subfield><subfield code="9">93,62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006759503</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV010176874 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:47:50Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006759503 |
oclc_num | 31129780 |
open_access_boolean | |
physical | 26 S. |
publishDate | 1993 |
publishDateSearch | 1993 |
publishDateSort | 1993 |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS |
spelling | Klop, Jan Willem 1945- Verfasser (DE-588)130644498 aut Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey J. W. Klop ; V. van Oostrom ; F. van Raamsdonk Amsterdam 1993 26 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> / Department of Computer Science: Report CS 93,62 Abstract: "Combinatory Reduction Systems, or CRSs for short, were designed to combine the usual first-order format of term rewriting with the presence of bound variables as in pure [lambda]-calculus and various typed [lambda]-calculi. Bound variables are also present in many other rewrite systems, such as systems with simplification rules for proof normalization. The original idea of CRSs is due to Aczel, who introduced a restricted class of CRSs and, under the assumption of orthogonality, proved confluence. Orthogonality means that the rules are non-ambiguous (no overlap leading to a critical pair) and left-linear (no global comparison of terms necessary) We introduce the class of orthogonal CRSs, illustrated with many examples, discuss its expressive power, and give an outline of a short proof of confluence. This proof is a direct generalization of Aczel's original proof, which is close to the well-known confluence proof for [lambda]-calculus by Tait and Martin-Lof. There is a well-known connection between the parallel reduction featuring in the latter proof, and the concept of 'developments', and a classical lemma in the theory of [lambda]-calculus is that of 'Finite Developments', a strong normalization result. It turns out that the notion of 'parallel reduction' used in Aczel's proof gives rise to a generalized form of developments, which we call 'superdevelopments' and on which we will briefly comment. We conclude with mentioning the results of a comparison of CRSs with the recently proposed and strongly related format of higher-order rewriting: Nipkow's HRSs (Higher-order Rewrite Systems). Lambda calculus Rewriting systems (Computer science) Oostrom, Vincent van Verfasser aut Raamsdonk, Femke van Verfasser aut Department of Computer Science: Report CS Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica <Amsterdam> 93,62 (DE-604)BV008928356 93,62 |
spellingShingle | Klop, Jan Willem 1945- Oostrom, Vincent van Raamsdonk, Femke van Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey Lambda calculus Rewriting systems (Computer science) |
title | Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey |
title_auth | Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey |
title_exact_search | Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey |
title_full | Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey J. W. Klop ; V. van Oostrom ; F. van Raamsdonk |
title_fullStr | Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey J. W. Klop ; V. van Oostrom ; F. van Raamsdonk |
title_full_unstemmed | Combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey J. W. Klop ; V. van Oostrom ; F. van Raamsdonk |
title_short | Combinatory reduction systems |
title_sort | combinatory reduction systems introduction and survey |
title_sub | introduction and survey |
topic | Lambda calculus Rewriting systems (Computer science) |
topic_facet | Lambda calculus Rewriting systems (Computer science) |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV008928356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klopjanwillem combinatoryreductionsystemsintroductionandsurvey AT oostromvincentvan combinatoryreductionsystemsintroductionandsurvey AT raamsdonkfemkevan combinatoryreductionsystemsintroductionandsurvey |