Verbal reasoning:
Abstract: "Previous theories of human reasoning have all been based on what might be called the transduction paradigm: people encode the problem statement into an internal representation, reason using processes devoted specifically to that purpose, and then decode the result. The nature of the...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Pittsburgh, PA
School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ.
1992
|
Schriftenreihe: | School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS
1992,178 |
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract: "Previous theories of human reasoning have all been based on what might be called the transduction paradigm: people encode the problem statement into an internal representation, reason using processes devoted specifically to that purpose, and then decode the result. The nature of the intermediate reasoning process has been a major source of debate among cognitive psychologists. Some researchers have proposed that this process can best be characterized as the application of formal rules of inference while others have argued that it corresponds to a search for alternative mental models of the problem statement. I believe that the transduction paradigm itself is in error, at least for the standard tasks that have been used in studying human deductive reasoning My thesis is that most untrained subjects lack sophisticated reasoning-specific mechanisms for solving these tasks, and that, in their absence, they attempt to make progress by repeatedly applying linguistic processes to encode and reencode the problem statement. I refer to this type of behavior as verbal reasoning. The ideas of verbal reasoning arose out of VR, a computational model of human behavior on categorical syllogisms. It simulates human behavior on every variant of the syllogism task using purely linguistic processes. VR models all of the standard phenomena that have been discovered about syllogistic reasoning and makes a number of novel predictions that have been empirically confirmed Furthermore, using a set of individual difference parameters, it has been tailored to fit the behavior of individual subjects with an accuracy that rivals the test-retest reliability of the subjects themselves. Since VR only uses linguistic processes, it provides compelling evidence that human syllogistic reasoning can best be characterized as verbal reasoning. Finally, to show that verbal reasoning generalizes to other tasks, I analyzed Johnson-Laird and Byrne's recent attempt to provide accounts of behavior on all the standard deductive reasoning tasks |
Beschreibung: | Zugl.: Pittsburgh, Pa., Univ., Diss., 1992 |
Beschreibung: | IV, 96 S. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV010171604 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20010102 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 950509s1992 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)26922572 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010171604 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-91 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 510.7808 |b C28r 92-178 | |
084 | |a DAT 706d |2 stub | ||
088 | |a CMU CS 92 178 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Polk, Thad A. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Verbal reasoning |c Thad A. Polk |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a CMU CS 92 178 |
264 | 1 | |a Pittsburgh, PA |b School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ. |c 1992 | |
300 | |a IV, 96 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS |v 1992,178 | |
500 | |a Zugl.: Pittsburgh, Pa., Univ., Diss., 1992 | ||
520 | 3 | |a Abstract: "Previous theories of human reasoning have all been based on what might be called the transduction paradigm: people encode the problem statement into an internal representation, reason using processes devoted specifically to that purpose, and then decode the result. The nature of the intermediate reasoning process has been a major source of debate among cognitive psychologists. Some researchers have proposed that this process can best be characterized as the application of formal rules of inference while others have argued that it corresponds to a search for alternative mental models of the problem statement. I believe that the transduction paradigm itself is in error, at least for the standard tasks that have been used in studying human deductive reasoning | |
520 | 3 | |a My thesis is that most untrained subjects lack sophisticated reasoning-specific mechanisms for solving these tasks, and that, in their absence, they attempt to make progress by repeatedly applying linguistic processes to encode and reencode the problem statement. I refer to this type of behavior as verbal reasoning. The ideas of verbal reasoning arose out of VR, a computational model of human behavior on categorical syllogisms. It simulates human behavior on every variant of the syllogism task using purely linguistic processes. VR models all of the standard phenomena that have been discovered about syllogistic reasoning and makes a number of novel predictions that have been empirically confirmed | |
520 | 3 | |a Furthermore, using a set of individual difference parameters, it has been tailored to fit the behavior of individual subjects with an accuracy that rivals the test-retest reliability of the subjects themselves. Since VR only uses linguistic processes, it provides compelling evidence that human syllogistic reasoning can best be characterized as verbal reasoning. Finally, to show that verbal reasoning generalizes to other tasks, I analyzed Johnson-Laird and Byrne's recent attempt to provide accounts of behavior on all the standard deductive reasoning tasks | |
630 | 0 | 7 | |a Verbal reasoning |g Test |0 (DE-588)4187536-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 4 | |a Inference | |
650 | 4 | |a Reasoning | |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Verbal reasoning |g Test |0 (DE-588)4187536-9 |D u |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
830 | 0 | |a School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS |v 1992,178 |w (DE-604)BV006187264 |9 1992,178 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006756031 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804124568823005184 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Polk, Thad A. |
author_facet | Polk, Thad A. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Polk, Thad A. |
author_variant | t a p ta tap |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV010171604 |
classification_tum | DAT 706d |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)26922572 (DE-599)BVBBV010171604 |
dewey-full | 510.7808 |
dewey-hundreds | 500 - Natural sciences and mathematics |
dewey-ones | 510 - Mathematics |
dewey-raw | 510.7808 |
dewey-search | 510.7808 |
dewey-sort | 3510.7808 |
dewey-tens | 510 - Mathematics |
discipline | Informatik Mathematik |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03408nam a2200433 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010171604</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20010102 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">950509s1992 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)26922572</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010171604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">510.7808</subfield><subfield code="b">C28r 92-178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DAT 706d</subfield><subfield code="2">stub</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="088" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CMU CS 92 178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Polk, Thad A.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Verbal reasoning</subfield><subfield code="c">Thad A. Polk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">CMU CS 92 178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Pittsburgh, PA</subfield><subfield code="b">School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ.</subfield><subfield code="c">1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IV, 96 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS</subfield><subfield code="v">1992,178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zugl.: Pittsburgh, Pa., Univ., Diss., 1992</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract: "Previous theories of human reasoning have all been based on what might be called the transduction paradigm: people encode the problem statement into an internal representation, reason using processes devoted specifically to that purpose, and then decode the result. The nature of the intermediate reasoning process has been a major source of debate among cognitive psychologists. Some researchers have proposed that this process can best be characterized as the application of formal rules of inference while others have argued that it corresponds to a search for alternative mental models of the problem statement. I believe that the transduction paradigm itself is in error, at least for the standard tasks that have been used in studying human deductive reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">My thesis is that most untrained subjects lack sophisticated reasoning-specific mechanisms for solving these tasks, and that, in their absence, they attempt to make progress by repeatedly applying linguistic processes to encode and reencode the problem statement. I refer to this type of behavior as verbal reasoning. The ideas of verbal reasoning arose out of VR, a computational model of human behavior on categorical syllogisms. It simulates human behavior on every variant of the syllogism task using purely linguistic processes. VR models all of the standard phenomena that have been discovered about syllogistic reasoning and makes a number of novel predictions that have been empirically confirmed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Furthermore, using a set of individual difference parameters, it has been tailored to fit the behavior of individual subjects with an accuracy that rivals the test-retest reliability of the subjects themselves. Since VR only uses linguistic processes, it provides compelling evidence that human syllogistic reasoning can best be characterized as verbal reasoning. Finally, to show that verbal reasoning generalizes to other tasks, I analyzed Johnson-Laird and Byrne's recent attempt to provide accounts of behavior on all the standard deductive reasoning tasks</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verbal reasoning</subfield><subfield code="g">Test</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187536-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inference</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reasoning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Verbal reasoning</subfield><subfield code="g">Test</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187536-9</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS</subfield><subfield code="v">1992,178</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV006187264</subfield><subfield code="9">1992,178</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006756031</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV010171604 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:47:44Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006756031 |
oclc_num | 26922572 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
owner_facet | DE-91 DE-BY-TUM |
physical | IV, 96 S. |
publishDate | 1992 |
publishDateSearch | 1992 |
publishDateSort | 1992 |
publisher | School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ. |
record_format | marc |
series | School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS |
series2 | School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS |
spelling | Polk, Thad A. Verfasser aut Verbal reasoning Thad A. Polk CMU CS 92 178 Pittsburgh, PA School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ. 1992 IV, 96 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS 1992,178 Zugl.: Pittsburgh, Pa., Univ., Diss., 1992 Abstract: "Previous theories of human reasoning have all been based on what might be called the transduction paradigm: people encode the problem statement into an internal representation, reason using processes devoted specifically to that purpose, and then decode the result. The nature of the intermediate reasoning process has been a major source of debate among cognitive psychologists. Some researchers have proposed that this process can best be characterized as the application of formal rules of inference while others have argued that it corresponds to a search for alternative mental models of the problem statement. I believe that the transduction paradigm itself is in error, at least for the standard tasks that have been used in studying human deductive reasoning My thesis is that most untrained subjects lack sophisticated reasoning-specific mechanisms for solving these tasks, and that, in their absence, they attempt to make progress by repeatedly applying linguistic processes to encode and reencode the problem statement. I refer to this type of behavior as verbal reasoning. The ideas of verbal reasoning arose out of VR, a computational model of human behavior on categorical syllogisms. It simulates human behavior on every variant of the syllogism task using purely linguistic processes. VR models all of the standard phenomena that have been discovered about syllogistic reasoning and makes a number of novel predictions that have been empirically confirmed Furthermore, using a set of individual difference parameters, it has been tailored to fit the behavior of individual subjects with an accuracy that rivals the test-retest reliability of the subjects themselves. Since VR only uses linguistic processes, it provides compelling evidence that human syllogistic reasoning can best be characterized as verbal reasoning. Finally, to show that verbal reasoning generalizes to other tasks, I analyzed Johnson-Laird and Byrne's recent attempt to provide accounts of behavior on all the standard deductive reasoning tasks Verbal reasoning Test (DE-588)4187536-9 gnd rswk-swf Inference Reasoning (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Verbal reasoning Test (DE-588)4187536-9 u DE-604 School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS 1992,178 (DE-604)BV006187264 1992,178 |
spellingShingle | Polk, Thad A. Verbal reasoning School of Computer Science <Pittsburgh, Pa.>: CMU-CS Verbal reasoning Test (DE-588)4187536-9 gnd Inference Reasoning |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4187536-9 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | Verbal reasoning |
title_alt | CMU CS 92 178 |
title_auth | Verbal reasoning |
title_exact_search | Verbal reasoning |
title_full | Verbal reasoning Thad A. Polk |
title_fullStr | Verbal reasoning Thad A. Polk |
title_full_unstemmed | Verbal reasoning Thad A. Polk |
title_short | Verbal reasoning |
title_sort | verbal reasoning |
topic | Verbal reasoning Test (DE-588)4187536-9 gnd Inference Reasoning |
topic_facet | Verbal reasoning Test Inference Reasoning Hochschulschrift |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV006187264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polkthada verbalreasoning AT polkthada cmucs92178 |