Dynamic statutory interpretation:
Contrary to traditional theories of statutory interpretation, which ground statutes in the original legislative text or intent, legal scholar William Eskridge argues that statutory interpretation changes in response to new political alignments, new interpreters, and new ideologies. It does so, first...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass. u.a.
Harvard Univ. Press
1994
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | Contrary to traditional theories of statutory interpretation, which ground statutes in the original legislative text or intent, legal scholar William Eskridge argues that statutory interpretation changes in response to new political alignments, new interpreters, and new ideologies. It does so, first of all, because it involves richer authoritative texts than does either common law or constitutional interpretation: statutes are often complex and have a detailed legislative history. Second, Congress can, and often does, rewrite statutes when it disagrees with their interpretations; and agencies and courts attend to current as well as historical congressional preferences when they interpret statutes. Third, since statutory interpretation is as much agency-centered as judge-centered and since agency executives see their creativity as more legitimate than judges see theirs, statutory interpretation in the modern regulatory state is particularly dynamic Eskridge also considers how different normative theories of jurisprudence - liberal, legal process, and antiliberal - inform debates about statutory interpretation. He explores what theory of statutory interpretation - if any - is required by the rule of law or by democratic theory. Finally, he provides an analytical and jurisprudential history of important debates on statutory interpretation |
| Beschreibung: | IX, 438 S. |
| ISBN: | 0674218787 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV010168150 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 950504s1994 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 0674218787 |9 0-674-21878-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)30076608 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV010168150 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakddb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-739 |a DE-29 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF425 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 348.73/22 |2 20 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.30822 |2 20 | |
| 084 | |a PU 5310 |0 (DE-625)140627: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Eskridge, William N. |d 1951- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)133076482 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dynamic statutory interpretation |c William N. Eskridge, Jr. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. u.a. |b Harvard Univ. Press |c 1994 | |
| 300 | |a IX, 438 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a Contrary to traditional theories of statutory interpretation, which ground statutes in the original legislative text or intent, legal scholar William Eskridge argues that statutory interpretation changes in response to new political alignments, new interpreters, and new ideologies. It does so, first of all, because it involves richer authoritative texts than does either common law or constitutional interpretation: statutes are often complex and have a detailed legislative history. Second, Congress can, and often does, rewrite statutes when it disagrees with their interpretations; and agencies and courts attend to current as well as historical congressional preferences when they interpret statutes. Third, since statutory interpretation is as much agency-centered as judge-centered and since agency executives see their creativity as more legitimate than judges see theirs, statutory interpretation in the modern regulatory state is particularly dynamic | |
| 520 | |a Eskridge also considers how different normative theories of jurisprudence - liberal, legal process, and antiliberal - inform debates about statutory interpretation. He explores what theory of statutory interpretation - if any - is required by the rule of law or by democratic theory. Finally, he provides an analytical and jurisprudential history of important debates on statutory interpretation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Droit - Interprétation | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Droit - Interprétation - Etats-Unis |2 ram | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Droit - Interprétation |2 ram | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Wetsinterpretatie |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |z United States |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Auslegung |0 (DE-588)4069008-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Auslegung |0 (DE-588)4069008-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006753043&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006753043 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804124564014235648 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | DYNAMIC STATUTORY INTERPRETATION WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR. HARVARD
UNIVERSITY PRESS CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS LONDON, ENGLAND 1994 * --
CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VII INTRODUCTION: WHY STATUTORY INTERPRETATION
IS WORTH A BOOK 1 I THE PRACTICE OF DYNAMIC STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 9 1
THE INSUFFICIENCY OF STATUTORY ARCHAEOLOGY 13 2 THE DYNAMICS OF
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 48 3 A CASE STUDY: LABOR INJUNCTION DECISIONS,
1877-1938 81 II JURISPRUDENTIAL THEORIES FOR READING STATUTES
DYNAMICALLY 107 4 LIBERAL THEORIES 111 5 LEGAL PROCESS THEORIES 141 6
NORMATIVIST THEORIES 174 III DOCTRINAL IMPLICATIONS OF DYNAMIC STATUTORY
JURISPRUDENCE 205 7 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY VALUES 207 8 VERTICAL VERSUS
HORIZONTAL COHERENCE 239 9 CANONS OF STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION AS
INTERPRETIVE REGIMES 275 APPENDIX 1 THE PRIMARY LEGISLATIVE INACTION
PRECEDENTS, 1962-1992 309 APPENDIX 2 SUPREME COURT DECISIONS OVERRULING
STATUTORY PRECEDENTS, 1962-1992 316 APPENDIX 3 THE REHNQUIST COURT S
CANONS OF STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION 323 NOTES 335 INDEX 429
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Eskridge, William N. 1951- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)133076482 |
| author_facet | Eskridge, William N. 1951- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Eskridge, William N. 1951- |
| author_variant | w n e wn wne |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV010168150 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF425 |
| callnumber-raw | KF425 |
| callnumber-search | KF425 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 3425 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| classification_rvk | PU 5310 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)30076608 (DE-599)BVBBV010168150 |
| dewey-full | 348.73/22 347.30822 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 348 - Laws, regulations, cases 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 348.73/22 347.30822 |
| dewey-search | 348.73/22 347.30822 |
| dewey-sort | 3348.73 222 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03258nam a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV010168150</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">950504s1994 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0674218787</subfield><subfield code="9">0-674-21878-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)30076608</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV010168150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakddb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF425</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">348.73/22</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.30822</subfield><subfield code="2">20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 5310</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140627:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eskridge, William N.</subfield><subfield code="d">1951-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)133076482</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dynamic statutory interpretation</subfield><subfield code="c">William N. Eskridge, Jr.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass. u.a.</subfield><subfield code="b">Harvard Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">1994</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IX, 438 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Contrary to traditional theories of statutory interpretation, which ground statutes in the original legislative text or intent, legal scholar William Eskridge argues that statutory interpretation changes in response to new political alignments, new interpreters, and new ideologies. It does so, first of all, because it involves richer authoritative texts than does either common law or constitutional interpretation: statutes are often complex and have a detailed legislative history. Second, Congress can, and often does, rewrite statutes when it disagrees with their interpretations; and agencies and courts attend to current as well as historical congressional preferences when they interpret statutes. Third, since statutory interpretation is as much agency-centered as judge-centered and since agency executives see their creativity as more legitimate than judges see theirs, statutory interpretation in the modern regulatory state is particularly dynamic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eskridge also considers how different normative theories of jurisprudence - liberal, legal process, and antiliberal - inform debates about statutory interpretation. He explores what theory of statutory interpretation - if any - is required by the rule of law or by democratic theory. Finally, he provides an analytical and jurisprudential history of important debates on statutory interpretation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Droit - Interprétation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Droit - Interprétation - Etats-Unis</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Droit - Interprétation</subfield><subfield code="2">ram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wetsinterpretatie</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069008-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Auslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069008-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006753043&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006753043</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV010168150 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T17:47:40Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 0674218787 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-006753043 |
| oclc_num | 30076608 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-739 DE-29 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-739 DE-29 DE-188 |
| physical | IX, 438 S. |
| publishDate | 1994 |
| publishDateSearch | 1994 |
| publishDateSort | 1994 |
| publisher | Harvard Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Eskridge, William N. 1951- Verfasser (DE-588)133076482 aut Dynamic statutory interpretation William N. Eskridge, Jr. Cambridge, Mass. u.a. Harvard Univ. Press 1994 IX, 438 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Contrary to traditional theories of statutory interpretation, which ground statutes in the original legislative text or intent, legal scholar William Eskridge argues that statutory interpretation changes in response to new political alignments, new interpreters, and new ideologies. It does so, first of all, because it involves richer authoritative texts than does either common law or constitutional interpretation: statutes are often complex and have a detailed legislative history. Second, Congress can, and often does, rewrite statutes when it disagrees with their interpretations; and agencies and courts attend to current as well as historical congressional preferences when they interpret statutes. Third, since statutory interpretation is as much agency-centered as judge-centered and since agency executives see their creativity as more legitimate than judges see theirs, statutory interpretation in the modern regulatory state is particularly dynamic Eskridge also considers how different normative theories of jurisprudence - liberal, legal process, and antiliberal - inform debates about statutory interpretation. He explores what theory of statutory interpretation - if any - is required by the rule of law or by democratic theory. Finally, he provides an analytical and jurisprudential history of important debates on statutory interpretation Droit - Interprétation Droit - Interprétation - Etats-Unis ram Droit - Interprétation ram Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Wetsinterpretatie gtt Recht Law Interpretation and construction Law United States Interpretation and construction Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd rswk-swf Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 s Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006753043&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Eskridge, William N. 1951- Dynamic statutory interpretation Droit - Interprétation Droit - Interprétation - Etats-Unis ram Droit - Interprétation ram Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Wetsinterpretatie gtt Recht Law Interpretation and construction Law United States Interpretation and construction Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4048737-4 (DE-588)4069008-8 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | Dynamic statutory interpretation |
| title_auth | Dynamic statutory interpretation |
| title_exact_search | Dynamic statutory interpretation |
| title_full | Dynamic statutory interpretation William N. Eskridge, Jr. |
| title_fullStr | Dynamic statutory interpretation William N. Eskridge, Jr. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic statutory interpretation William N. Eskridge, Jr. |
| title_short | Dynamic statutory interpretation |
| title_sort | dynamic statutory interpretation |
| topic | Droit - Interprétation Droit - Interprétation - Etats-Unis ram Droit - Interprétation ram Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Wetsinterpretatie gtt Recht Law Interpretation and construction Law United States Interpretation and construction Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Auslegung (DE-588)4069008-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Droit - Interprétation Droit - Interprétation - Etats-Unis Droit - États-Unis - Interprétation Wetsinterpretatie Recht Law Interpretation and construction Law United States Interpretation and construction Auslegung USA |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=006753043&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eskridgewilliamn dynamicstatutoryinterpretation |